Skip to content

Aquatic Exercise and Efficacy Enhancement to Decrease Fall Risk in Older Adults With Hip Osteoarthritis

The Effect of Aquatic Exercise and Aquatic Exercise Combined With Education and Efficacy Enhancement on Improving Indices of Fall Risk in Older Adults With Hip Osteoarthritis: a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00289458
Enrollment
79
Registered
2006-02-09
Start date
2005-10-31
Completion date
2008-04-30
Last updated
2010-08-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Arthritis

Keywords

older adults, falls, arthritis, aquatic, exercise

Brief summary

The objective of this project is to determine the effect of aquatic exercise and aquatic exercise combined with an education program on decreasing fall risk in older adults with hip osteoarthritis. The hypothesis is that aquatic exercise will improve function, strength and balance and the addition of the education session will enhance confidence in movement.

Detailed description

Older adults with hip osteoarthritis (OA) often experience pain and loss of mobility that significantly impairs their ability to walk, climb stairs, shop or participate in exercise programs. This can result in social isolation, depression and loss of confidence in their ability to manage independently in the community. A decline in physical and psycho-social function leads to increased risk of falling. It is crucial to identify high-risk fallers as well as the best interventions to decrease that risk; hip fractures from falls are devastating, resulting in death or admission to long-term care for the majority who sustain them. Exercise programs designed to improve balance, strength and mobility can help to improve function and decrease risk of falling. However, individuals with hip OA may have difficulty participating in these programs due to pain. Aquatic exercise offers an activity alternative to improve mobility, strength and decrease fall risk. As well, the addition of a group program designed to enhance confidence in movement may further reduce the risk of falls by improving independence to be more active at home and in the community. This project will evaluate the effect of aquatic exercise and aquatic exercise combined with a group educational program on decreasing fall risk in older adults with hip OA. Determining optimal fall prevention programs may avert death and loss of quality of life for older adults, clearly an important contribution to preventative health care.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALexercise

A community aquatic exercise program designed for older adults to improve balance, strength and mobility to decrease the risk of falls.

BEHAVIORAL2

Same as 1 with the addition of a 1/week educational group program to improve confidence in movement, learn about fall risk and fall prevention and the rationale for the exercises to decrease fall risk.

BEHAVIORALControl

no exercise

Sponsors

Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)
CollaboratorOTHER_GOV
University of Saskatchewan
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
65 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* over age 65 * clinical diagnosis of hip osteoarthritis

Exclusion criteria

* medical condition tha significantly decreases functional ability such that not safe to exercise in a community program * already exercising in a moderate exercise program 2/week or more

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Balancebaseline and 11 weeksBerg Balance Scale range 0 - 36 (36 is excellent balance, 0 is poor or no ability for standing balance)
Change in Chair Standsbaseline and 11 weekschange in number of repetitions (the number of times moving from full sitting to full standing in 30 seconds)
Change in Walkingbaseline and 11 weekschange in 6 minute walk (distance in meters covered in 6 minutes)over 11 weeks
Change in Falls-Efficacybaseline and 11 weekschange in Activities Balance Confidence Scale (0 - 100, 100 represents high confidence, 0 represents low confidence)
Change in Dual Task Functionbaseline and 11 weekschange in Timed Up and Go Cognitive Test (time in sec., lower number means better performance)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Physical Activitybaseline and 11 weekschange in Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly (0 - up to 300, higher score more active)

Countries

Canada

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Recruitment Sept 2005 to 2006, posters in physician offices, senior housing, recreational facilities and advertisements in local newspaper

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Control Group
Continued with usual activity and care, no intervention
25
Aquatic Exercise
Attended twice per week community aquatic exercise class focussed on improving strength, balance and mobility
26
Aquatic Exercise Plus Education
Attended twice per week community aquatic exercise class designed to improve strength, balance, and mobility plus an additional educational class once per week to learn about fall risk, and improve confidence in ability to prevent falls.
28
Total79

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Overall StudyDeath100
Overall StudyPhysician Decision342
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject224

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicAquatic ExerciseAquatic Exercise Plus EducationControl GroupTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
26 Participants28 Participants25 Participants79 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age Continuous74.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.5
73.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.8
75.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.2
74.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.3
Region of Enrollment
Canada
26 participants28 participants25 participants79 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
20 Participants20 Participants16 Participants56 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
6 Participants8 Participants9 Participants23 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 790 / 790 / 79
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 790 / 790 / 79

Outcome results

Primary

Change in Balance

Berg Balance Scale range 0 - 36 (36 is excellent balance, 0 is poor or no ability for standing balance)

Time frame: baseline and 11 weeks

Population: ITT and LOCF

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Control GroupChange in Balance0.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.3
Aquatic ExerciseChange in Balance1.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.3
Aquatic Exercise Plus EducationChange in Balance1.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.5
Primary

Change in Chair Stands

change in number of repetitions (the number of times moving from full sitting to full standing in 30 seconds)

Time frame: baseline and 11 weeks

Population: ITT and LOCF

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Control GroupChange in Chair Stands0.6 number of stands per 30 secondsStandard Deviation 1.7
Aquatic ExerciseChange in Chair Stands0.6 number of stands per 30 secondsStandard Deviation 1.7
Aquatic Exercise Plus EducationChange in Chair Stands1.5 number of stands per 30 secondsStandard Deviation 2
Primary

Change in Dual Task Function

change in Timed Up and Go Cognitive Test (time in sec., lower number means better performance)

Time frame: baseline and 11 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Control GroupChange in Dual Task Function0.2 unit of scale (seconds)Standard Deviation 4.3
Aquatic ExerciseChange in Dual Task Function0.7 unit of scale (seconds)Standard Deviation 3.1
Aquatic Exercise Plus EducationChange in Dual Task Function2.5 unit of scale (seconds)Standard Deviation 5.1
Primary

Change in Falls-Efficacy

change in Activities Balance Confidence Scale (0 - 100, 100 represents high confidence, 0 represents low confidence)

Time frame: baseline and 11 weeks

Population: ITT and LOCF

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Control GroupChange in Falls-Efficacy2.4 unit of scaleStandard Deviation 10.7
Aquatic ExerciseChange in Falls-Efficacy0.8 unit of scaleStandard Deviation 21.1
Aquatic Exercise Plus EducationChange in Falls-Efficacy5.8 unit of scaleStandard Deviation 12.4
Primary

Change in Walking

change in 6 minute walk (distance in meters covered in 6 minutes)over 11 weeks

Time frame: baseline and 11 weeks

Population: ITT and LOCF

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Control GroupChange in Walking0.3 unit of scale (meters per 6 minutes)Standard Deviation 70.7
Aquatic ExerciseChange in Walking14.5 unit of scale (meters per 6 minutes)Standard Deviation 70.3
Aquatic Exercise Plus EducationChange in Walking43.3 unit of scale (meters per 6 minutes)Standard Deviation 63.8
Secondary

Change in Physical Activity

change in Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly (0 - up to 300, higher score more active)

Time frame: baseline and 11 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Control GroupChange in Physical Activity101.4 unit of scaleStandard Deviation 47.3
Aquatic ExerciseChange in Physical Activity106.9 unit of scaleStandard Deviation 50.4
Aquatic Exercise Plus EducationChange in Physical Activity96.6 unit of scaleStandard Deviation 32.7

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026