Skip to content

Outcomes of Swallowing Rehabilitation After Stroke

Outcomes of Swallowing Rehabilitation After Stroke

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00288834
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2006-02-08
Start date
2001-08-31
Completion date
2006-07-31
Last updated
2006-02-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cerebrovascular Accident, Dysphagia, Stroke

Keywords

stroke, dysphagia, rehabilitation, biofeedback

Brief summary

This project proposes to evaluate the relative effectiveness of four therapy protocols for pharyngeal phase swallowing impairment in the stroke population. Data derived from this study should contribute significantly to our understanding of the rehabilitative process in the neurogenic dysphagic population and will provide the foundation for the establishment of efficacious, cost-efficient patient services. 1\. Research Question to be addressed 1. The utilization of SEMG biofeedback monitoring in dysphagia rehabilitation facilitates more rapid and complete recovery than traditional rehabilitation using the same swallowing exercises without exteroceptive feedback. 2. Swallowing rehabilitation provided in an intensive rehabilitative programme (10 hrs of treatment in the 1st week) facilitates more rapid and complete recovery than traditionally scheduled swallowing rehabilitation (twice weekly).

Detailed description

This multi-site, multi-national project will evaluate the relative effectiveness of four therapy protocols for pharyngeal phase swallowing impairment in the stroke population. For this study, patients with chronic dysphagia secondary to stroke will be assigned to one of four treatment protocols. These four protocols differ in respect to the intensity of treatment and the inclusion of surface electromyography (SEMG) biofeedback as an adjunct to treatment. All patients will complete a total of 30 hours of therapy with data collection to assess progress at intervals of every 10 sessions. Treatment outcomes will be measured using a combination of physiologic and behavioral measures. Data derived from this study should contribute significantly to our understanding of the rehabilitative process in the neurogenic dysphagic population and will provide the foundation for the establishment of efficacious, cost-efficient patient services.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALdysphagia rehabilitation

Sponsors

University of Toronto
CollaboratorOTHER
Tan Tock Seng Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Fremantle Hospital and Health Service
CollaboratorOTHER
Austin Hospital, Melbourne Australia
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Canterbury
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
21 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Subjects will represent the diagnostic categories of single event brain stem injury, right cortical stroke and left cortical stroke. * Chronic dysphagia at least 6 months post onset secondary to single neurological event, brain stem, right cortical or left cortical stroke confirmed with CT or MRI * Diagnosis of chronic pharyngeal phase dysphagia based on clinical and videofluoroscopic evaluation completed within 3 weeks of beginning treatment. * Must be at least 12 months post onset with no substantial recovery of swallowing function. If patients have received prior swallowing treatment, they must be at least three months post the termination of direct treatment. * Mini Mental Status Exam score \>21

Exclusion criteria

* history of pre-existing dysphagia or neurologic disease prior to the onset of the current disorder. * MMSE score \< 21

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The following outcomes measures will be assessed after 10. 20 and 30 therapeutic sessions:
Severity rankings of swallowing pathophysiology based on videofluoroscopic swallowing studies Videofluoroscopic swallowing studies
Functional outcome ratings of associated clinical parameters (respiratory, neurological status, self help, cognitive)
Quality of life ratings (SwalQOL) In addition, quality of life ratings (SwalQOL) will be assessed at one follow-up assessment six months post discharge.

Countries

Australia, Canada, New Zealand, Singapore

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026