Skip to content

Treatment of Bifurcated Coronary Lesions With Cypher™-Stent

Prospective, Randomized, Single-Center Evaluation of the Cypher™ Sirolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System in the Treatment of Bifurcated Coronary Lesions

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00288535
Enrollment
200
Registered
2006-02-08
Start date
2005-03-31
Completion date
2007-02-28
Last updated
2007-09-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Coronary Artery Disease

Keywords

coronary bifurcation ; PCI; modified T-Stenting; sirolimus stent

Brief summary

This study is a prospective, randomized, single-center evaluation of the Cypher™ Sirolimus eluting coronary stent system in the treatment of de novo bifurcated coronary lesions comparing provisional modified T stenting with systematic modified T-stenting.

Detailed description

Bifurcations involving a significant side branch (SB diameter ≥ 2.25 mm) occur in approximately 15-20% of all coronary lesions considered for percutaneous intervention. If a side branch (SB) subtends significant myocardium, failure to preserve SB vessel patency can lead to complications such as myocardial infarction or persistent chest pain despite full patency of the main branch. Bifurcation lesions are inherently complex and interventional treatment remains a challenging problem for physicians. The optimal technique for stenting bifurcated lesions is still unknown. Several dual vessel stenting techniques have been described in the literature, such as T, V, Y, Culotte and Crush procedures. However, most studies of bifurcation stenting have found that optimal long-term results are obtained by stenting the main vessel and then performing plain balloon angioplasty of the side branch (kissing balloon-technique). Nevertheless, occlusion or reduced flow of the SB are frequent after stenting of the MB. Therefore, the SB is stented in approximately 50% of procedures even if PTCA alone was intended. Hypothesis: Compared with plain dilatation of side branch, the placement of Cypher-Stent in side branch using modified T-stenting technique will reduce in-segment percent diameter stenosis of the side branch at 9 months post procedure as measured by quantitative coronary angiography.

Interventions

PROCEDUREPCI of bifurcated coronary lesions using sirolimus coated stents in modified T-Stenting -Technique

Sponsors

Cordis, Johnson&Johnson company
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
University Heart Center Freiburg - Bad Krozingen
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* 1\. The target vessel must meet the following criteria: 1. Bifurcated lesion Type 1, 2, 3 or 4 of a native coronary artery with a reference vessel diameter of 2.5 mm to 4.0 mm in the main branch and of ≥ 2.25 mm in the side branch. 2. The target lesion (main branch and / or side branch) must be at least 50% diameter stenosis. 3. The target lesion has not been previously treated with any interventional procedure. 4. The target vessel (main branch and side branch) must be feasible for stent implantation (successful passage with the guide wire; successful predilatation with an appropriately sized balloon; no heavy calcification; no diffuse distal disease that might impede run off). 2\. Patient has stable or unstable angina pectoris (CCS classification I or greater) or a positive stress test for ischemia. 3\. Patient must be ≥ 18 years of age. 4. Female subjects of childbearing potential must have a negative pregnancy test within 7 days before the procedure. 5\. Patient has no other treatment planned within 30 days of the procedure. 6. Patient has been informed of the nature of the study and agrees to its provisions and has written informed consent as approved by the Ethics Committee. 7\. Patient willing to comply with required post-procedure follow-up.

Exclusion criteria

* 1\. Patient has had an acute myocardial infarction (\> 3x normal CK with presence of CKMB) within 72 hours preceding the index procedure and CK has not returned to normal limits at the time of the procedure. 2\. Patient will have a known hypersensitivity or contraindication to aspirin, heparin, clopidogrel, stainless steel, sirolimus, or contrast sensitivity that cannot be adequately pre-medicated. 3\. Patient has a platelet count of \<100,000 cells/mm³ or \>700,000 cells/mm³, a WBC of \<3,000 cells/mm³, or documented or suspected liver disease. 4\. Patient has a history of bleeding diathesis or coagulopathy. 5. Patient has suffered a CVA or TIA within the past six months. 6. Active peptic ulcer or upper GI bleeding within the prior 6 months. 7. Patient has a co-morbidity (i.e. cancer or congestive heart failure) that may cause the patient to be non-compliant with the protocol, or is associated with limited life- expectancy (less than 2 years). 8\. Patient must be excluded from the study if any of these angiographic criteria are met: 1. The target vessel contains intraluminal thrombus. 2. The target lesion is located in the left main coronary artery. 3. The target lesion or vessel shows angiographic evidence of severe calcification. 4. The patient has undergone previous PCI to the target vessel within 6 months. 5. Pre treatment of the lesion is done with a technique other than balloon angioplasty (e.g. rotablation).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
In-segment percent diameter stenosis of the side branch at 9 months post procedure as measured by quantitative coronary angiography.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Freedom from Major Adverse Cardiac Events (MACE)at 30 days, 6 and 12 months
Angiographic binary restenosis (≥ 50% diameter stenosis) in the main and side branch at 9 months post procedure.
Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR) at 12 months post procedure.
Device success during PCI
Post-procedure thrombotic stent occlusion at 12 months

Countries

Germany

Contacts

Primary ContactMiroslaw Ferenc, Dr.
Miroslaw.Ferenc@herzzentrum.de0049 7633 4020
Backup ContactFranz-Josef Neumann, Prof. Dr.
Franz-Josef.Neumann@herzzentrum.de0049 7633 4020

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 3, 2026