Skip to content

Three-Arm Study of the Safety and Efficacy of Pirfenidone in Patients With Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis

A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo Controlled, Phase 3, Three-Arm Study of the Safety and Efficacy of Pirfenidone in Patients With Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00287716
Enrollment
435
Registered
2006-02-07
Start date
2006-07-14
Completion date
2008-11-10
Last updated
2017-05-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis

Keywords

Idiopathic, Pulmonary, Fibrosis, Lung, Pirfenidone, InterMune

Brief summary

The objectives of this study are to assess the safety and efficacy of treatment with pirfenidone 2403 milligrams per day (mg/d) compared with placebo in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), to assess the safety and efficacy of treatment with pirfenidone 1197 mg/d in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis and to characterize the pharmacokinetic disposition of pirfenidone in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis.

Detailed description

This is a Phase 3, randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled, three-arm, safety and efficacy study of pirfenidone in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Approximately 400 patients at approximately 70 centers will be randomly assigned (2:2:1) to receive either 2403 milligrams (mg) of pirfenidone, placebo equivalent, or 1197 mg of pirfenidone administered in divided doses three times per day (TID) with food. Patients will be randomized by geographic region. Patients will receive blinded study treatment from the time of randomization until the last patient randomized has been treated for 72 weeks. A Data Monitoring Committee (DMC) will periodically review safety and efficacy data to ensure patient safety. After week 72, patients who meet the Progression of Disease (POD) definition, which is a ≥ 10% absolute decrease in percent predicted FVC or a ≥ 15% absolute decrease in percent predicted carbon monoxide diffusing capacity (DLco), will be eligible to receive permitted IPF therapies in addition to their blinded study drug. Permitted IPF therapies include corticosteroids, azathioprine, cyclophosphamide and N-acetyl-cysteine (with restrictions).

Interventions

DRUGPirfenidone

1197 or 2403 mg/day given orally, and administered in divided doses three times daily with food, for the duration of the study.

DRUGPlacebo

Placebo equivalent, given orally, and administered in divided doses three times daily with food, for the duration of the study.

Sponsors

Genentech, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
40 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Primary Inclusion criteria: * diagnosis of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis * 40 to 80 years of age * Forced Vital Capacity greater than or equal to 50% predicted value * Carbon monoxide diffusing capacity greater than or equal to 35% predicted value * either Forced Vital Capacity or Carbon monoxide diffusing capacity less than or equal to 90% predicted value * no improvement in past year * able to walk 150 meters in 6 minutes and maintain saturation greater than or equal to 83% while on no more than 6 liters per minute (L/min) supplemental oxygen Primary

Exclusion criteria

* unable to undergo pulmonary function testing * evidence of significant obstructive lung disease or airway hyper-responsiveness * in opinion of investigator patient is expected to need and be eligible for a lung transplant within 72 weeks after randomization * active infection * liver disease * cancer or other medical condition likely to result in death within 2 years * diabetes * pregnancy or lactation * substance abuse * personal or family history of long QT (Q wave,T wave) syndrome * other IPF treatment * unable to take study medication * withdrawal from other IPF trials

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Absolute Change in Percent Predicted Forced Vital Capacity (FVC)From baseline up to 72 weeksMean Change in Percent Predicted Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) as measured from baseline to week 72.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Progression-free Survival (PFS)Baseline to Week 72Progression is defined as the first occurrence of a 10% absolute decline from baseline in percent predicted Forced Vital Capacity, a 15% absolute decline from baseline in percent predicted hemoglobin(Hgb)-corrected carbon monoxide diffusing capacity (DLco), or, death.
Change in Six-Minute Walk Test (6MWT)DistanceBaseline to Week 72The change from Baseline to week 72 in distance walked during the 6-Minute Walk Test as measured in meters (m).
Change in Worst Oxygen Saturation by Pulse Oximetry (SpO2) Measurement Observed During the 6-Minute Walk TestBaseline to Week 72The change from baseline to week 72 in worst oxygen saturation during the 6-Minute Walk Test as measure by Pulse Oximetry (SpO2) Level is calculated as the simple difference between baseline SpO2 measurements and week 72 SpO2 measurements.
Categorical Assessment of Absolute Change in Percent Predicted Forced Vital Capacity (FVC)baseline up to 72 weeksBased on the change in baseline percent predicted FVC at week 72, patients were assigned to 1 of 5 categories: mild decline (\<10% but \>=0% decline), moderate decline (\<20% but \>=10% decline), severe decline (\>=20% decline), mild improvement (\>0% but \<10% improvement), or moderate improvement (\>=10% improvement). Those who died or had a lung transplant before Week 72 were included in the severe decline category. The results indicate the number of patients who experienced a Categorical Change in Percent Predicted Forced Vital Capacity.
Change in Dyspnea ScoreBaseline to Week 72The mean change from baseline to week 72 in Dyspnea score was measured by the University of San Diego Shortness of Breath Questionnaire (UCSD SOBQ). The SOBQ is used to assess shortness of breath with various activities of daily living (for example, brushing ones teeth or mowing the lawn). Patients rated the severity of their shortness of breath experienced on an average day during the past week on a 6 point scale (0 to 5), with 0 = not at all breathless, 4= severely breathless and 5 = Maximally or unable to do because of breathlessness.
Worsening of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (IPF)Time to acute IPF exacerbation, IPF-related death, lung transplant or respiratory hospitalization, whichever comes first.Worsening of IPF was defined by the occurrence of any of the following events: Acute IPF exacerbation, IPF-related death, Lung transplantation, or Respiratory hospitalization.
Change in Percent Predicted Hemoglobin (Hb)-Corrected Carbon Monoxide Diffusing Capacity (DLco) of the LungsBaseline to Week 72

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Pirfenidone 2403 mg/Day
pirfenidone, total daily dose of 2403 mg/day, given as 3 divided doses 3 times/day
174
Pirfenidone 1197 mg/Day
pirfenidone, total daily dose of 1197 mg/day, given as 3 divided doses 3 times/day
87
Placebo
placebo equivalent, given as 3 divided doses 3 times/day
174
Total435

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPirfenidone 2403 mg/DayPirfenidone 1197 mg/DayPlaceboTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
99 Participants59 Participants101 Participants259 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
75 Participants28 Participants73 Participants176 Participants
Age, Continuous65.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.15
68 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.63
66.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.53
66.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.83
Region of Enrollment
Australia
3 participants3 participants3 participants9 participants
Region of Enrollment
Canada
21 participants8 participants18 participants47 participants
Region of Enrollment
Europe
34 participants18 participants38 participants90 participants
Region of Enrollment
Mexico
2 participants0 participants1 participants3 participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
114 participants58 participants114 participants286 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
56 Participants22 Participants46 Participants124 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
118 Participants65 Participants128 Participants311 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
171 / 17486 / 87169 / 174
serious
Total, serious adverse events
60 / 17428 / 8758 / 174

Outcome results

Primary

Absolute Change in Percent Predicted Forced Vital Capacity (FVC)

Mean Change in Percent Predicted Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) as measured from baseline to week 72.

Time frame: From baseline up to 72 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Pirfenidone 2403 mg/DayAbsolute Change in Percent Predicted Forced Vital Capacity (FVC)-8.0 Change in Percent Predicted FVCStandard Deviation 16.47
Pirfenidone 1197 mg/DayAbsolute Change in Percent Predicted Forced Vital Capacity (FVC)-10.0 Change in Percent Predicted FVCStandard Deviation 16.68
PlaceboAbsolute Change in Percent Predicted Forced Vital Capacity (FVC)-12.4 Change in Percent Predicted FVCStandard Deviation 18.45
Secondary

Categorical Assessment of Absolute Change in Percent Predicted Forced Vital Capacity (FVC)

Based on the change in baseline percent predicted FVC at week 72, patients were assigned to 1 of 5 categories: mild decline (\<10% but \>=0% decline), moderate decline (\<20% but \>=10% decline), severe decline (\>=20% decline), mild improvement (\>0% but \<10% improvement), or moderate improvement (\>=10% improvement). Those who died or had a lung transplant before Week 72 were included in the severe decline category. The results indicate the number of patients who experienced a Categorical Change in Percent Predicted Forced Vital Capacity.

Time frame: baseline up to 72 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Pirfenidone 2403 mg/DayCategorical Assessment of Absolute Change in Percent Predicted Forced Vital Capacity (FVC)Mild improvement of >0% but <10%40 Patients
Pirfenidone 2403 mg/DayCategorical Assessment of Absolute Change in Percent Predicted Forced Vital Capacity (FVC)Mild decline of <10% but >=0%97 Patients
Pirfenidone 2403 mg/DayCategorical Assessment of Absolute Change in Percent Predicted Forced Vital Capacity (FVC)Severe decline of >=20%, death, or lung transplant14 Patients
Pirfenidone 2403 mg/DayCategorical Assessment of Absolute Change in Percent Predicted Forced Vital Capacity (FVC)Moderate decline of <20% but >=10%21 Patients
Pirfenidone 2403 mg/DayCategorical Assessment of Absolute Change in Percent Predicted Forced Vital Capacity (FVC)Moderate improvement of >=10%2 Patients
Pirfenidone 1197 mg/DayCategorical Assessment of Absolute Change in Percent Predicted Forced Vital Capacity (FVC)Mild decline of <10% but >=0%51 Patients
Pirfenidone 1197 mg/DayCategorical Assessment of Absolute Change in Percent Predicted Forced Vital Capacity (FVC)Severe decline of >=20%, death, or lung transplant9 Patients
Pirfenidone 1197 mg/DayCategorical Assessment of Absolute Change in Percent Predicted Forced Vital Capacity (FVC)Moderate decline of <20% but >=10%14 Patients
Pirfenidone 1197 mg/DayCategorical Assessment of Absolute Change in Percent Predicted Forced Vital Capacity (FVC)Mild improvement of >0% but <10%12 Patients
Pirfenidone 1197 mg/DayCategorical Assessment of Absolute Change in Percent Predicted Forced Vital Capacity (FVC)Moderate improvement of >=10%1 Patients
PlaceboCategorical Assessment of Absolute Change in Percent Predicted Forced Vital Capacity (FVC)Moderate improvement of >=10%0 Patients
PlaceboCategorical Assessment of Absolute Change in Percent Predicted Forced Vital Capacity (FVC)Mild improvement of >0% but <10%24 Patients
PlaceboCategorical Assessment of Absolute Change in Percent Predicted Forced Vital Capacity (FVC)Severe decline of >=20%, death, or lung transplant27 Patients
PlaceboCategorical Assessment of Absolute Change in Percent Predicted Forced Vital Capacity (FVC)Mild decline of <10% but >=0%90 Patients
PlaceboCategorical Assessment of Absolute Change in Percent Predicted Forced Vital Capacity (FVC)Moderate decline of <20% but >=10%33 Patients
Secondary

Change in Dyspnea Score

The mean change from baseline to week 72 in Dyspnea score was measured by the University of San Diego Shortness of Breath Questionnaire (UCSD SOBQ). The SOBQ is used to assess shortness of breath with various activities of daily living (for example, brushing ones teeth or mowing the lawn). Patients rated the severity of their shortness of breath experienced on an average day during the past week on a 6 point scale (0 to 5), with 0 = not at all breathless, 4= severely breathless and 5 = Maximally or unable to do because of breathlessness.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 72

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Pirfenidone 2403 mg/DayChange in Dyspnea Score12 Change in Dyspnea ScoreStandard Deviation 24
Pirfenidone 1197 mg/DayChange in Dyspnea Score14 Change in Dyspnea ScoreStandard Deviation 25
PlaceboChange in Dyspnea Score15 Change in Dyspnea ScoreStandard Deviation 26
Secondary

Change in Percent Predicted Hemoglobin (Hb)-Corrected Carbon Monoxide Diffusing Capacity (DLco) of the Lungs

Time frame: Baseline to Week 72

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Pirfenidone 2403 mg/DayChange in Percent Predicted Hemoglobin (Hb)-Corrected Carbon Monoxide Diffusing Capacity (DLco) of the Lungs-8 Change in Percent Predicted DLcoStandard Deviation 10
Pirfenidone 1197 mg/DayChange in Percent Predicted Hemoglobin (Hb)-Corrected Carbon Monoxide Diffusing Capacity (DLco) of the Lungs-9 Change in Percent Predicted DLcoStandard Deviation 11
PlaceboChange in Percent Predicted Hemoglobin (Hb)-Corrected Carbon Monoxide Diffusing Capacity (DLco) of the Lungs-10 Change in Percent Predicted DLcoStandard Deviation 12
Secondary

Change in Six-Minute Walk Test (6MWT)Distance

The change from Baseline to week 72 in distance walked during the 6-Minute Walk Test as measured in meters (m).

Time frame: Baseline to Week 72

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Pirfenidone 2403 mg/DayChange in Six-Minute Walk Test (6MWT)Distance-60 Change in Distance Walked in MetersStandard Deviation 121
Pirfenidone 1197 mg/DayChange in Six-Minute Walk Test (6MWT)Distance-76 Change in Distance Walked in MetersStandard Deviation 132
PlaceboChange in Six-Minute Walk Test (6MWT)Distance-77 Change in Distance Walked in MetersStandard Deviation 135
Secondary

Change in Worst Oxygen Saturation by Pulse Oximetry (SpO2) Measurement Observed During the 6-Minute Walk Test

The change from baseline to week 72 in worst oxygen saturation during the 6-Minute Walk Test as measure by Pulse Oximetry (SpO2) Level is calculated as the simple difference between baseline SpO2 measurements and week 72 SpO2 measurements.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 72

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Pirfenidone 2403 mg/DayChange in Worst Oxygen Saturation by Pulse Oximetry (SpO2) Measurement Observed During the 6-Minute Walk Test-2 Change,Worst Oxygen Saturation (Percent)Standard Deviation 4
Pirfenidone 1197 mg/DayChange in Worst Oxygen Saturation by Pulse Oximetry (SpO2) Measurement Observed During the 6-Minute Walk Test-1 Change,Worst Oxygen Saturation (Percent)Standard Deviation 5
PlaceboChange in Worst Oxygen Saturation by Pulse Oximetry (SpO2) Measurement Observed During the 6-Minute Walk Test-2 Change,Worst Oxygen Saturation (Percent)Standard Deviation 5
Secondary

Progression-free Survival (PFS)

Progression is defined as the first occurrence of a 10% absolute decline from baseline in percent predicted Forced Vital Capacity, a 15% absolute decline from baseline in percent predicted hemoglobin(Hgb)-corrected carbon monoxide diffusing capacity (DLco), or, death.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 72

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Pirfenidone 2403 mg/DayProgression-free Survival (PFS)Death or Disease Progression45 Number of Patients with Progression
Pirfenidone 2403 mg/DayProgression-free Survival (PFS)Decline in Percent Predicted FVC >=10%28 Number of Patients with Progression
Pirfenidone 2403 mg/DayProgression-free Survival (PFS)Decline in Percent Predicted DLco >=15%9 Number of Patients with Progression
Pirfenidone 2403 mg/DayProgression-free Survival (PFS)Death Before Disease Progression8 Number of Patients with Progression
Pirfenidone 1197 mg/DayProgression-free Survival (PFS)Death Before Disease Progression7 Number of Patients with Progression
Pirfenidone 1197 mg/DayProgression-free Survival (PFS)Death or Disease Progression28 Number of Patients with Progression
Pirfenidone 1197 mg/DayProgression-free Survival (PFS)Decline in Percent Predicted DLco >=15%5 Number of Patients with Progression
Pirfenidone 1197 mg/DayProgression-free Survival (PFS)Decline in Percent Predicted FVC >=10%16 Number of Patients with Progression
PlaceboProgression-free Survival (PFS)Death Before Disease Progression14 Number of Patients with Progression
PlaceboProgression-free Survival (PFS)Decline in Percent Predicted FVC >=10%39 Number of Patients with Progression
PlaceboProgression-free Survival (PFS)Decline in Percent Predicted DLco >=15%9 Number of Patients with Progression
PlaceboProgression-free Survival (PFS)Death or Disease Progression62 Number of Patients with Progression
Comparison: The null hypothesis is that there is no treatment difference between the pirfenidone 2403 mg/day treatment group and the placebo treatment group.p-value: 0.02395% CI: [0.44, 0.95]Log Rank
Secondary

Worsening of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (IPF)

Worsening of IPF was defined by the occurrence of any of the following events: Acute IPF exacerbation, IPF-related death, Lung transplantation, or Respiratory hospitalization.

Time frame: Time to acute IPF exacerbation, IPF-related death, lung transplant or respiratory hospitalization, whichever comes first.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Pirfenidone 2403 mg/DayWorsening of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (IPF)26 Number of Patients Who Worsened
Pirfenidone 1197 mg/DayWorsening of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (IPF)10 Number of Patients Who Worsened
PlaceboWorsening of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (IPF)30 Number of Patients Who Worsened
Comparison: The null hypothesis is that there is no treatment difference between the pirfenidone 2403-mg/d treatment group and the placebo treatment group.p-value: 0.51595% CI: [0.5, 1.42]Log Rank

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 29, 2026