Skip to content

Randomized Trial Evaluating Slow-Release Formulation TAXUS Paclitaxel-Eluting Coronary Stent in the Treatment of In-Stent Restenosis

A Prospective, Randomized Trial Evaluating Slow-Release Formulation TAXUS Paclitaxel-Eluting Coronary Stent in the Treatment of In-Stent Restenosis

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00287573
Acronym
TAXUS V ISR
Enrollment
488
Registered
2006-02-07
Start date
2003-06-30
Completion date
2010-01-31
Last updated
2010-08-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Coronary Restenosis

Brief summary

The objective of this study is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the TAXUS Express2 Paclitaxel-Eluting Coronary Stent System as compared to brachytherapy in patients experiencing in-stent restenosis.

Detailed description

Percutaneous approaches to in-stent restenosis (ISR) have included balloon angioplasty alone, rotational atherectomy, cutting balloon angioplasty, directional coronary atherectomy, excimer laser angioplasty, placement of a second stent or any combination thereof, and intra-coronary brachytherapy. Of these, only brachytherapy has been shown to reduce recurrent restenosis after PCI for ISR, - and is now considered the standard of care. Logistical considerations in establishing and maintaining a radiation program have limited the widespread availability of this modality. These considerations include the need for involvement of radiation oncologists, physicists, and safety officers; nuclear licensing requirements; need for increased shielding and safety training; equipment and procedural complexities; as well as increased procedural time and costs. Furthermore, recurrent ISR after brachytherapy may still occur. Stent based drug delivery for the treatment of ISR holds promise as a much simpler, safer and potentially more effective alternative to brachytherapy. This is a prospective, randomized (1:1), open-label, multicenter, safety and efficacy trial for the treatment of in-stent restenosis. The primary objective is to demonstrate a superior or non-inferior 9-month target vessel revascularization (TVR) rate for TAXUS-SR stent compared to intra-coronary brachytherapy (beta source).

Interventions

DEVICETAXUS Express2

Paclitaxel-Eluting Coronary Stent System

PROCEDUREBrachytherapy (beta source)

Brachytherapy (beta source)

Sponsors

Boston Scientific Corporation
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Cumulative target lesion length is \</= 46 mm (visual estimate). * Reference vessel diameter (RVD) is \>/= 2.5 and \</= 3.75 mm (visual estimate) * Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is \>/= 25%

Exclusion criteria

* Any previous or planned treatment with a non-study anti-restenotic drug-coated or drug-eluting coronary stent in the target vessel. (Note:previous or planned treatment with heparin or phosphorylcholine coated stents is acceptable, as long as, the procedure with the non-study stent meets the protocol defined criteria for non-target lesion interventions.) * Previous or planned treatment with intra-coronary brachytherapy (gamma or beta source) in the target vessel * Previous external radiotherapy to the heart or target vessel area * Known genetic radiation sensitivity disorders (i.e. ataxia-telangiectasia, etc.) * Side branch of the target lesion includes ostial narrowing \>/= 50% diameter stenosis (DS) and is \>/= 2.0 mm diameter * Target lesion has been previously treated for ISR with the placement of a second stent(s), which covers \>/= 50% of the original stent length (a true stent sandwich) * Target vessel is pre-treated with an unapproved device, directional or rotational coronary atherectomy, laser, or transluminal extraction catheter immediately prior to delivery of randomized treatment (stent placement or intra-coronary brachytherapy) * Recent myocardial infarction (MI) (symptom onset \</= 72 hours prior to randomization) * CK-MB \>2x the local laboratory's upper limit of normal (ULN) (refers to a measured value on the day of the index procedure as drawn per protocol) * Anticipated treatment with warfarin during any period in the 6 months post index procedure * Anticipated treatment with paclitaxel, oral rapamycin or colchicine during any period in the 9 months post index procedure * Planned use of both the study stent and a non-study stent (i.e., commercial stent) in the treatment of the target lesion

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Rate of Target Vessel Revascularization9 Months

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Stent thrombosis rate5 Years
Target Vessel Failure (TVF, defined as any ischemia-driven revascularization of the target vessel, MI related to the target vessel, or death related to the target vessel).5 Years
Clinical procedural success and technical success5 Years
Binary restenosis rate5 years
Evaluate outcomes and treatment of recurrent restenosis in the TAXUS stent arm5 Years
Absolute lesion length9 Months
Reference Vessel Diameter (RVD)9 Months
Minimum Lumen Diameter (MLD)9 Months
Percent diameter stenosis (% DS)9 Months
Incidence of composite major adverse cardiac events (MACE) and the individual components of MACEassessed at discharge, 1, 4 and 9 months post index procedure and annually for 5 years
Late loss9 Months
Loss index9 Months
Patterns of recurrent restenosis, including edge effect9 Months
Coronary aneurysm9 Months
Identification of potential safety issues.9 Months
Change in neointimal volume from post procedure to follow-up9 Months
Change in MLD within the stent or area of brachytherapy9 Months
Minimum lumen area (MLA) within the stent or area of brachytherapy9 Months
Lumen, plaque and vessel measurements at the treatment edges (outside of the stent or area of brachytherapy)9 Months
Acute gain9 Months

Countries

Canada, United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Apr 11, 2026