Skip to content

Safety and Efficacy Study of Prosaptide to Treat Neuropathic Pain in HIV-Positive Patients

A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Multicenter, Dose Ranging Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Prosaptide Over 6 Weeks of Treatment for the Relief of Neuropathic Pain Associated With HIV-1

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00286377
Enrollment
350
Registered
2006-02-03
Start date
2003-09-30
Completion date
2004-12-31
Last updated
2006-02-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

HIV, Peripheral Nervous System Disorders

Brief summary

This is a double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel groups study to determine whether prosptide is effective in relieving pain in patients who have sensory neuropathic pain related to their HIV infection or the drugs used to treat it.

Detailed description

Sensory neruopathies are the most frequent neurological complicaton of HIV infection and its treatmet with antiretrovirals. To date, there are few effective treatments, and all are symptomatic treatments for pain. Management typically involves the intiation and adjustment of pain-modifying therapies, and the adjustment or discontinuation of potentially neurotoxic antiretrovirals, thereby limiting the choice of HAART regimens. In precinical animal models,prosaptide has been shown to be efficacious in the treatment of neuropathic pain caused by a variety of different mechanisms. Hypothesis: Prosaptide will improve neuropathic pain in HIV-associated sensory neuroathies,and will be safe and well tolerated in subjects. Comparisons: 4, 8, or 16 mg prosaptide vs. placebo

Interventions

DRUGprosaptide

Sponsors

Neurologic AIDS Research Consortium (NARC)
CollaboratorOTHER
Savient Pharmaceuticals
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Ages 18 years and older

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Differnece between the pain rating at Baseline vs. Week 6 (or last week)of treatment, based on the 13-point Gracely pain intensity scale as rated by subjects and captured in an electronic diary

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Difference between the Beline pain rating and each week of treatment.
Number of subjects whoe were treatment successes at each week of the active treatment period.

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Apr 7, 2026