Primary Ceramic-on-Ceramic Total Hip Replacement Versus Metal-on-Metal Hip Resurfacing in Young Active Patients

Status

Completed

Phases

Study type

Interventional

Source

ClinicalTrials.gov

Registry ID

NCT00285129

Enrollment

400

Registered

2006-02-01

Start date

2004-01-31

Completion date

2004-12-31

Last updated

2007-12-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Indications for a Total Hip Prosthesis

Brief summary

Comparison of the functional result and speed of rehabilitation between two types of hip prostheses: primary ceramic-on-ceramic total hip replacement versus metal-on-metal hip resurfacing.

Interventions

DEVICEceramic-on-ceramic total hip replacement versus metal-on-metal hip resurfacing

Study design

Allocation

RANDOMIZED

Intervention model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary purpose

TREATMENT

Masking

NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

ALL

Age

18 Years to 65 Years

Healthy volunteers

Inclusion criteria

* Total hip replacement

Exclusion criteria

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Functional result	—
Speed of rehabilitation	—

Countries

Belgium

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026