Skip to content

Safety and Efficacy of Ranibizumab in Japanese Patients With Subfoveal Choroidal Neovascularization Secondary to Age-related Macular Degeneration

Open-label Multicenter, Phase I/II Study Assessing the Safety and Efficacy of Ranibizumab (RFB002) in Japanese Patients With Subfoveal Choroidal Neovascularization (CNV) Secondary to Age-related Macular Degeneration (AMD)

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 1Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00284089
Enrollment
88
Registered
2006-01-31
Start date
2005-04-30
Completion date
2009-01-31
Last updated
2011-02-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Subfoveal Choroidal Neovascularization(CNV) Secondary to Age-related Macular Degeneration (AMD)

Keywords

Subfoveal CNV, AMD, ranibizumab

Brief summary

Open-label Multicenter, Phase I/II Study comprising three phases (single dose, multiple dose and extension phase), Assessing the Safety and Efficacy of Ranibizumab (RFB002) in Japanese Patients With Subfoveal Choroidal Neovascularization (CNV) Secondary to Age-related Macular Degeneration (AMD).

Detailed description

The safety and tolerability of single intravitreal injections of ranibizumab was evaluated in patients enrolled in the single dose phase (Group A). Patients who successfully completed the single dose phase (i.e. did not experience a grade-3 targeted adverse event) could enter the multiple dose phase and receive ranibizumab injections for an additional 11 months. Simultaneously, the multiple dose phase was initiated in two parallel dose groups of additional patients (Group B), who received ranibizumab injections for 12 months. After patients in Group A and Group B had completed the multiple dose phase, all patients who provided written consent and were considered eligible based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria of the extension phase had the opportunity to continue on study treatment with the individualized flexible treatment regimen guided by monthly acuity scores and other ophthalmic examinations until approval of ranibizumab in Japan.

Interventions

DRUGRanibizumab

Ranibizumab was administered by intravitreal injection in the study eye. Intravitreal injection was performed by the investigator following slitlamp examination.

Sponsors

Novartis
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
50 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Male or female patients 50 years of age or greater 2. Patients with primary or recurrent subfoveal CNV secondary to AMD 3. Patients who have a BCVA score between 73 and 24 letters in the study eye using ETDRS-like grading charts (approximately 20/40 to 20/320)

Exclusion criteria

1\. No prior treatment in the study eye with verteporfin, external-beam radiation therapy, subfoveal focal laser photocoagulation, vitrectomy, or transpupillary thermotherapy Extension Phase Inclusion criteria: 1. Personally provided written informed consent to participate in the extension phase. 2. Patients with subfoveal CNV secondary to AMD who had completed the multiple dose phase in either of the ranibizumab groups (Group A or B). 3. Patients could participate in the extension phase even if they failed to do so on the day of the exit visit in the multiple dose phase (Group A and B), regardless of the time elapsed until the participation in the extension phase.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean Change From Baseline in the Best Corrected Visual Acuity Score of the Study Eye at Month 6 in Group BBaseline and Month 6The efficacy assessment was based on Group B patients. Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) was assessed during all study visits using best correction determined from protocol refraction at a starting test distance of 2 meters. VA measurements were taken in a sitting position using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS)-like visual acuity testing charts at a starting test distance of 2 meters. The BCVA score is the number of letters read correctly by the patient, hence an increase in score indicates improvement in acuity.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Categorical Analysis of Best Corrected Visual Acuity of the Study Eye at Month 6 and Month 12 in Group BBaseline, Month 6 and Month 12BCVA measurements were taken in a sitting position using best correction determined from protocol refraction and ETDRS-like visual acuity testing charts at a starting test distance of 2 meters.
Extension Phase: Mean Change From Month 12 (Start of Extension Phase) in Best Corrected Visual Acuity Score of the Study Eye at Last Visit of Extension Phase in Group B.Month 12 (start of extension phase) and last visit of extension phase. Duration in the extension phase varied depending on the study entry. The mean duration of treatment was 1.45 years in the 0.3 mg group and 1.36 years in the 0.5 mg dose group.Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) was assessed during all study visits using best correction determined from protocol refraction at a starting test distance of 2 meters. VA measurements were taken in a sitting position using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS)-like visual acuity testing charts at a starting test distance of 2 meters. The BCVA score is the number of letters read correctly by the patient, hence an increase in score indicates improvement in acuity.
Extension Phase: Categorical Analysis of Best Corrected Visual Acuity of the Study Eye at Last Visit of Extension Phase in Group BBaseline and last visit of extension phase - Duration in the extension phase varied depending on the study entry. The mean duration of treatment was 1.45 years in the 0.3 mg group and 1.36 years in the 0.5 mg dose group.BCVA measurements were taken in a sitting position using best correction determined from protocol refraction and ETDRS-like visual acuity testing charts at a starting test distance of 2 meters. The following categories were evaluated: * Participants with a BCVA score loss of fewer than 15 letters from baseline at Last Visit * Participants with a BCVA score loss of 30 or more letters from baseline at Last Visit * Participants with a BCVA score gain of 15 or more letters from baseline at Last Visit * Participants with a BCVA score of less than 34 letters at Last Visit
Mean Change From Baseline in Total Area of Choroidal Neovascularization of the Study Eye in Group BBaseline, Months 3, 6, 9 and 12Choroidal Neovascularization was assessed by fluorescein angiography in conjunction with color fundus photography. Analysis was performed by the central reading center. The area of Choroidal Neovascularization is expressed as Macular Photocoagulation Study standard Disc Areas (DA; equivalent to 2.54 mm\^2 on the retina).
Mean Change From Baseline in the Best Corrected Visual Acuity Score of the Study Eye at Month 12 in Group BBaseline and Month 12The efficacy assessment was based on Group B patients. BCVA was assessed during all study visits using best correction determined from protocol refraction and ETDRS-like visual acuity testing charts at a starting test distance of 2 meters. The BCVA score is the number of letters read correctly by the patient, hence an increase in score indicates improvement in acuity.
Percentage of Participants in Group B With Absence of Leakage in the Study Eye at Month 3, 6, 9 and 12.Months 3, 6, 9 and 12Area of leakage was assessed by fluorescein angiography in conjunction with color fundus photography. Analysis was performed at the central reading center.
Mean Change From Baseline in Foveal Retinal Thickness of the Study Eye in Group BBaseline, Months 3, 6, 9 and 12Foveal retinal thickness was assessed by Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) at a subset of the study sites and was analyzed by the central reading center.
Mean Change From Baseline in Total Retinal Volume of the Study Eye in Group BBaseline, Months 3, 6, 9 and 12Total retinal volume was assessed by Optical Coherence tomography (OCT) at a subset of the study sites and was analyzed by the central reading center.
Mean Change From Baseline in Total Area of Leakage From CNV Plus Staining of Retinal Pigment Epithelium of the Study Eye in Group BBaseline, Months 3, 6, 9 and 12Area of leakage from CNV plus staining of retinal pigment epithelium was assessed by fluorescein angiography in conjunction with color fundus photography. Analysis was performed by the central reading center. The total area is expressed as Macular Photocoagulation Study standard Disc Areas (DA; equivalent to 2.54 mm\^2 on the retina).

Countries

Japan

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

In total, 88 patients were enrolled in the study, 12 in Group A and 76 in Group B. The single dose phase of the study (Group A patients only) was completed prior to initiation of the multiple dose phase (Groups A and B).

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Group A: Ranibizumab 0.3 mg
In the single dose phase, all patients randomized in Group A received a single intravitreal injection of 0.3 mg of ranibizumab into the study eye. Those patients who successfully completed this phase entered the multiple dose phase, where they received an intravitreal injection of 0.3 mg of ranibizumab once a month for an additional 11 months. Subsequently patients enrolling in the extension phase received an intravitreal injection of 0.3 mg of ranibizumab according to an individualized flexible interval regimen guided by monthly best corrected visual acuity scores and other ophthalmic examinations. In the extension phase patients received the same dose level as they received in the multiple dose phase of the study, for an average of 1.70 years.
6
Group A: Ranibizumab 0.5 mg
In the single dose phase, all patients randomized in Group A received a single intravitreal injection of 0.5 mg of ranibizumab into the study eye. Those patients who successfully completed this phase entered the multiple dose phase, where they received an intravitreal injection of 0.5 mg of ranibizumab once a month for an additional 11 months. Subsequently Group A patients enrolling in the extension phase received an intravitreal injection of 0.5 mg of ranibizumab according to an individualized flexible interval regimen guided by monthly best corrected visual acuity scores and other ophthalmic examinations. In the extension phase patients received the same dose level as they received in the multiple dose phase of the study, for an average of 1.93 years.
6
Group B: Ranibizumab 0.3 mg
Group B patients received a total of 12 monthly intravitreal injections of 0.3 mg of ranibizumab into the study eye in the multiple dose phase of the study. Group B patients enrolled in the extension phase received an intravitreal injection of 0.3 mg of ranibizumab according to an individualized flexible interval regimen guided by monthly best corrected visual acuity scores and other ophthalmic examinations. In the extension phase patients received the same dose level as they received in the multiple dose phase of the study, for an average of 1.45 years.
35
Group B: Ranibizumab 0.5 mg
Group B patients received a total of 12 monthly intravitreal injections of 0.5 mg of ranibizumab into the study eye in the multiple dose phase of the study. Group B patients who enrolled in the extension phase received an intravitreal injection of 0.5 mg of ranibizumab according to an individualized flexible interval regimen guided by monthly best corrected visual acuity scores and other ophthalmic examinations. In the extension phase patients received the same dose level as they received in the multiple dose phase of the study, for an average of 1.36 years.
41
Total88

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003
Extension PhaseAdverse Event0022
Extension Phasecondition no longer requires study drug2027
Extension PhaseProtocol Violation0010
Extension PhaseWithdrawal by Subject0013
Multiple Dose PhaseAdverse Event1011
Multiple Dose PhaseDeath0011
Multiple Dose PhaseProtocol Violation0010
Multiple Dose PhaseWithdrawal by Subject0012

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicGroup A: Ranibizumab 0.3 mgGroup A: Ranibizumab 0.5 mgGroup B: Ranibizumab 0.3 mgGroup B: Ranibizumab 0.5 mgTotal
Age, Customized
50 to <65 years
2 Participants0 Participants8 Participants10 Participants20 Participants
Age, Customized
65 to <75 years
1 Participants4 Participants16 Participants13 Participants35 Participants
Age, Customized
75 to <85 years
2 Participants2 Participants6 Participants12 Participants21 Participants
Age, Customized
>= 85 years
0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants3 Participants4 Participants
Gender
Female
0 participants1 participants9 participants5 participants15 participants
Gender
Male
3 participants5 participants19 participants28 participants55 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
1 Participants1 Participants9 Participants8 Participants19 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
5 Participants5 Participants26 Participants33 Participants69 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
38 / 4143 / 4727 / 3128 / 39
serious
Total, serious adverse events
5 / 418 / 475 / 318 / 39

Outcome results

Primary

Mean Change From Baseline in the Best Corrected Visual Acuity Score of the Study Eye at Month 6 in Group B

The efficacy assessment was based on Group B patients. Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) was assessed during all study visits using best correction determined from protocol refraction at a starting test distance of 2 meters. VA measurements were taken in a sitting position using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS)-like visual acuity testing charts at a starting test distance of 2 meters. The BCVA score is the number of letters read correctly by the patient, hence an increase in score indicates improvement in acuity.

Time frame: Baseline and Month 6

Population: Intent-to treat (ITT) population for Group B patients consisted of all patients randomized in Group B that received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline assessment of the primary efficacy variable. The Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) was used to impute missing data at month 6 in the ITT analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Group B: Ranibizumab 0.3 mgMean Change From Baseline in the Best Corrected Visual Acuity Score of the Study Eye at Month 6 in Group BBaseline47.6 Number of LettersStandard Deviation 11.82
Group B: Ranibizumab 0.3 mgMean Change From Baseline in the Best Corrected Visual Acuity Score of the Study Eye at Month 6 in Group BMonth 655.7 Number of LettersStandard Deviation 13.16
Group B: Ranibizumab 0.3 mgMean Change From Baseline in the Best Corrected Visual Acuity Score of the Study Eye at Month 6 in Group BChange from Baseline8.1 Number of LettersStandard Deviation 12.65
Group B: Ranibizumab 0.5 mgMean Change From Baseline in the Best Corrected Visual Acuity Score of the Study Eye at Month 6 in Group BBaseline48.1 Number of LettersStandard Deviation 10.75
Group B: Ranibizumab 0.5 mgMean Change From Baseline in the Best Corrected Visual Acuity Score of the Study Eye at Month 6 in Group BMonth 657.1 Number of LettersStandard Deviation 14.99
Group B: Ranibizumab 0.5 mgMean Change From Baseline in the Best Corrected Visual Acuity Score of the Study Eye at Month 6 in Group BChange from Baseline9.0 Number of LettersStandard Deviation 9.62
Secondary

Categorical Analysis of Best Corrected Visual Acuity of the Study Eye at Month 6 and Month 12 in Group B

BCVA measurements were taken in a sitting position using best correction determined from protocol refraction and ETDRS-like visual acuity testing charts at a starting test distance of 2 meters.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 6 and Month 12

Population: ITT population, using LOCF.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Group B: Ranibizumab 0.3 mgCategorical Analysis of Best Corrected Visual Acuity of the Study Eye at Month 6 and Month 12 in Group BLoss of < 15 letters from Baseline at month 634 Participants
Group B: Ranibizumab 0.3 mgCategorical Analysis of Best Corrected Visual Acuity of the Study Eye at Month 6 and Month 12 in Group BLoss of < 15 letters from Baseline at month 1234 Participants
Group B: Ranibizumab 0.3 mgCategorical Analysis of Best Corrected Visual Acuity of the Study Eye at Month 6 and Month 12 in Group BGain of ≥15 letters from Baseline at month 612 Participants
Group B: Ranibizumab 0.3 mgCategorical Analysis of Best Corrected Visual Acuity of the Study Eye at Month 6 and Month 12 in Group BGain of ≥15 letters from Baseline at month 1213 Participants
Group B: Ranibizumab 0.3 mgCategorical Analysis of Best Corrected Visual Acuity of the Study Eye at Month 6 and Month 12 in Group BLoss of ≥30 letters from Baseline at month 60 Participants
Group B: Ranibizumab 0.3 mgCategorical Analysis of Best Corrected Visual Acuity of the Study Eye at Month 6 and Month 12 in Group BLoss of ≥30 letters from Baseline at month 120 Participants
Group B: Ranibizumab 0.3 mgCategorical Analysis of Best Corrected Visual Acuity of the Study Eye at Month 6 and Month 12 in Group BVisual acuity < 34 letters at Month 62 Participants
Group B: Ranibizumab 0.3 mgCategorical Analysis of Best Corrected Visual Acuity of the Study Eye at Month 6 and Month 12 in Group BVisual acuity < 34 letters at Month 122 Participants
Group B: Ranibizumab 0.5 mgCategorical Analysis of Best Corrected Visual Acuity of the Study Eye at Month 6 and Month 12 in Group BVisual acuity < 34 letters at Month 121 Participants
Group B: Ranibizumab 0.5 mgCategorical Analysis of Best Corrected Visual Acuity of the Study Eye at Month 6 and Month 12 in Group BLoss of < 15 letters from Baseline at month 641 Participants
Group B: Ranibizumab 0.5 mgCategorical Analysis of Best Corrected Visual Acuity of the Study Eye at Month 6 and Month 12 in Group BLoss of ≥30 letters from Baseline at month 60 Participants
Group B: Ranibizumab 0.5 mgCategorical Analysis of Best Corrected Visual Acuity of the Study Eye at Month 6 and Month 12 in Group BLoss of < 15 letters from Baseline at month 1241 Participants
Group B: Ranibizumab 0.5 mgCategorical Analysis of Best Corrected Visual Acuity of the Study Eye at Month 6 and Month 12 in Group BVisual acuity < 34 letters at Month 62 Participants
Group B: Ranibizumab 0.5 mgCategorical Analysis of Best Corrected Visual Acuity of the Study Eye at Month 6 and Month 12 in Group BGain of ≥15 letters from Baseline at month 610 Participants
Group B: Ranibizumab 0.5 mgCategorical Analysis of Best Corrected Visual Acuity of the Study Eye at Month 6 and Month 12 in Group BLoss of ≥30 letters from Baseline at month 120 Participants
Group B: Ranibizumab 0.5 mgCategorical Analysis of Best Corrected Visual Acuity of the Study Eye at Month 6 and Month 12 in Group BGain of ≥15 letters from Baseline at month 1213 Participants
Secondary

Extension Phase: Categorical Analysis of Best Corrected Visual Acuity of the Study Eye at Last Visit of Extension Phase in Group B

BCVA measurements were taken in a sitting position using best correction determined from protocol refraction and ETDRS-like visual acuity testing charts at a starting test distance of 2 meters. The following categories were evaluated: * Participants with a BCVA score loss of fewer than 15 letters from baseline at Last Visit * Participants with a BCVA score loss of 30 or more letters from baseline at Last Visit * Participants with a BCVA score gain of 15 or more letters from baseline at Last Visit * Participants with a BCVA score of less than 34 letters at Last Visit

Time frame: Baseline and last visit of extension phase - Duration in the extension phase varied depending on the study entry. The mean duration of treatment was 1.45 years in the 0.3 mg group and 1.36 years in the 0.5 mg dose group.

Population: Includes patients enrolled in the extension phase, observed data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Group B: Ranibizumab 0.3 mgExtension Phase: Categorical Analysis of Best Corrected Visual Acuity of the Study Eye at Last Visit of Extension Phase in Group BLoss of < 15 letters from Baseline24 Participants
Group B: Ranibizumab 0.3 mgExtension Phase: Categorical Analysis of Best Corrected Visual Acuity of the Study Eye at Last Visit of Extension Phase in Group BGain of ≥15 letters from Baseline9 Participants
Group B: Ranibizumab 0.3 mgExtension Phase: Categorical Analysis of Best Corrected Visual Acuity of the Study Eye at Last Visit of Extension Phase in Group BLoss of ≥30 letters from Baseline1 Participants
Group B: Ranibizumab 0.3 mgExtension Phase: Categorical Analysis of Best Corrected Visual Acuity of the Study Eye at Last Visit of Extension Phase in Group BVisual acuity < 34 letters3 Participants
Group B: Ranibizumab 0.5 mgExtension Phase: Categorical Analysis of Best Corrected Visual Acuity of the Study Eye at Last Visit of Extension Phase in Group BVisual acuity < 34 letters1 Participants
Group B: Ranibizumab 0.5 mgExtension Phase: Categorical Analysis of Best Corrected Visual Acuity of the Study Eye at Last Visit of Extension Phase in Group BLoss of < 15 letters from Baseline32 Participants
Group B: Ranibizumab 0.5 mgExtension Phase: Categorical Analysis of Best Corrected Visual Acuity of the Study Eye at Last Visit of Extension Phase in Group BLoss of ≥30 letters from Baseline1 Participants
Group B: Ranibizumab 0.5 mgExtension Phase: Categorical Analysis of Best Corrected Visual Acuity of the Study Eye at Last Visit of Extension Phase in Group BGain of ≥15 letters from Baseline9 Participants
Secondary

Extension Phase: Mean Change From Month 12 (Start of Extension Phase) in Best Corrected Visual Acuity Score of the Study Eye at Last Visit of Extension Phase in Group B.

Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) was assessed during all study visits using best correction determined from protocol refraction at a starting test distance of 2 meters. VA measurements were taken in a sitting position using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS)-like visual acuity testing charts at a starting test distance of 2 meters. The BCVA score is the number of letters read correctly by the patient, hence an increase in score indicates improvement in acuity.

Time frame: Month 12 (start of extension phase) and last visit of extension phase. Duration in the extension phase varied depending on the study entry. The mean duration of treatment was 1.45 years in the 0.3 mg group and 1.36 years in the 0.5 mg dose group.

Population: The analysis population included all enrolled patients in the extension phase. For the analysis of the results of the extension phase, all data are presented as observed. Patients must have values both at Month 12 and Last Visit to be included.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Group B: Ranibizumab 0.3 mgExtension Phase: Mean Change From Month 12 (Start of Extension Phase) in Best Corrected Visual Acuity Score of the Study Eye at Last Visit of Extension Phase in Group B.Baseline47.9 LettersStandard Deviation 12.59
Group B: Ranibizumab 0.3 mgExtension Phase: Mean Change From Month 12 (Start of Extension Phase) in Best Corrected Visual Acuity Score of the Study Eye at Last Visit of Extension Phase in Group B.Last visit55.4 LettersStandard Deviation 17.14
Group B: Ranibizumab 0.3 mgExtension Phase: Mean Change From Month 12 (Start of Extension Phase) in Best Corrected Visual Acuity Score of the Study Eye at Last Visit of Extension Phase in Group B.Month 1259.1 LettersStandard Deviation 11.69
Group B: Ranibizumab 0.3 mgExtension Phase: Mean Change From Month 12 (Start of Extension Phase) in Best Corrected Visual Acuity Score of the Study Eye at Last Visit of Extension Phase in Group B.Change from Month 12-3.6 LettersStandard Deviation 14.82
Group B: Ranibizumab 0.5 mgExtension Phase: Mean Change From Month 12 (Start of Extension Phase) in Best Corrected Visual Acuity Score of the Study Eye at Last Visit of Extension Phase in Group B.Change from Month 12-2.2 LettersStandard Deviation 7.92
Group B: Ranibizumab 0.5 mgExtension Phase: Mean Change From Month 12 (Start of Extension Phase) in Best Corrected Visual Acuity Score of the Study Eye at Last Visit of Extension Phase in Group B.Baseline50.0 LettersStandard Deviation 10.38
Group B: Ranibizumab 0.5 mgExtension Phase: Mean Change From Month 12 (Start of Extension Phase) in Best Corrected Visual Acuity Score of the Study Eye at Last Visit of Extension Phase in Group B.Month 1259.8 LettersStandard Deviation 15.07
Group B: Ranibizumab 0.5 mgExtension Phase: Mean Change From Month 12 (Start of Extension Phase) in Best Corrected Visual Acuity Score of the Study Eye at Last Visit of Extension Phase in Group B.Last visit57.6 LettersStandard Deviation 15.36
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline in Foveal Retinal Thickness of the Study Eye in Group B

Foveal retinal thickness was assessed by Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) at a subset of the study sites and was analyzed by the central reading center.

Time frame: Baseline, Months 3, 6, 9 and 12

Population: The analysis includes Group B Intent-to treat (ITT) population, observed data. OCT was performed in a total of 58 patients at selected sites.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Group B: Ranibizumab 0.3 mgMean Change From Baseline in Foveal Retinal Thickness of the Study Eye in Group BMean change from Baseline at Month 3 [N=27, 29]-124.4 micrometersStandard Deviation 141.6
Group B: Ranibizumab 0.3 mgMean Change From Baseline in Foveal Retinal Thickness of the Study Eye in Group BMean change from Baseline at Month 9 [N=26, 27]-188.4 micrometersStandard Deviation 190.1
Group B: Ranibizumab 0.3 mgMean Change From Baseline in Foveal Retinal Thickness of the Study Eye in Group BMean change from Baseline at Month 6 [N=26, 28]-142.9 micrometersStandard Deviation 199.3
Group B: Ranibizumab 0.3 mgMean Change From Baseline in Foveal Retinal Thickness of the Study Eye in Group BMean change from Baseline at Month 12 [N=26, 26]-194.0 micrometersStandard Deviation 199.8
Group B: Ranibizumab 0.3 mgMean Change From Baseline in Foveal Retinal Thickness of the Study Eye in Group BBaseline [N=28, 30]336.7 micrometersStandard Deviation 195.3
Group B: Ranibizumab 0.5 mgMean Change From Baseline in Foveal Retinal Thickness of the Study Eye in Group BMean change from Baseline at Month 12 [N=26, 26]-257.8 micrometersStandard Deviation 209.8
Group B: Ranibizumab 0.5 mgMean Change From Baseline in Foveal Retinal Thickness of the Study Eye in Group BBaseline [N=28, 30]370.7 micrometersStandard Deviation 171.9
Group B: Ranibizumab 0.5 mgMean Change From Baseline in Foveal Retinal Thickness of the Study Eye in Group BMean change from Baseline at Month 3 [N=27, 29]-195.6 micrometersStandard Deviation 187.5
Group B: Ranibizumab 0.5 mgMean Change From Baseline in Foveal Retinal Thickness of the Study Eye in Group BMean change from Baseline at Month 6 [N=26, 28]-225.6 micrometersStandard Deviation 192.2
Group B: Ranibizumab 0.5 mgMean Change From Baseline in Foveal Retinal Thickness of the Study Eye in Group BMean change from Baseline at Month 9 [N=26, 27]-245.4 micrometersStandard Deviation 203.1
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline in the Best Corrected Visual Acuity Score of the Study Eye at Month 12 in Group B

The efficacy assessment was based on Group B patients. BCVA was assessed during all study visits using best correction determined from protocol refraction and ETDRS-like visual acuity testing charts at a starting test distance of 2 meters. The BCVA score is the number of letters read correctly by the patient, hence an increase in score indicates improvement in acuity.

Time frame: Baseline and Month 12

Population: Intent-to treat (ITT) population for Group B patients consisted of all patients randomized in Group B that received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline assessment of the efficacy variable. The Last Observation carried Forward (LOCF) was used to impute missing data at month 12 in the ITT analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Group B: Ranibizumab 0.3 mgMean Change From Baseline in the Best Corrected Visual Acuity Score of the Study Eye at Month 12 in Group BBaseline47.6 Number of LettersStandard Deviation 11.82
Group B: Ranibizumab 0.3 mgMean Change From Baseline in the Best Corrected Visual Acuity Score of the Study Eye at Month 12 in Group BMonth 1257.1 Number of LettersStandard Deviation 12.91
Group B: Ranibizumab 0.3 mgMean Change From Baseline in the Best Corrected Visual Acuity Score of the Study Eye at Month 12 in Group BChange from Baseline9.5 Number of LettersStandard Deviation 12.79
Group B: Ranibizumab 0.5 mgMean Change From Baseline in the Best Corrected Visual Acuity Score of the Study Eye at Month 12 in Group BBaseline48.1 Number of LettersStandard Deviation 10.75
Group B: Ranibizumab 0.5 mgMean Change From Baseline in the Best Corrected Visual Acuity Score of the Study Eye at Month 12 in Group BMonth 1258.6 Number of LettersStandard Deviation 15.44
Group B: Ranibizumab 0.5 mgMean Change From Baseline in the Best Corrected Visual Acuity Score of the Study Eye at Month 12 in Group BChange from Baseline10.5 Number of LettersStandard Deviation 11.14
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline in Total Area of Choroidal Neovascularization of the Study Eye in Group B

Choroidal Neovascularization was assessed by fluorescein angiography in conjunction with color fundus photography. Analysis was performed by the central reading center. The area of Choroidal Neovascularization is expressed as Macular Photocoagulation Study standard Disc Areas (DA; equivalent to 2.54 mm\^2 on the retina).

Time frame: Baseline, Months 3, 6, 9 and 12

Population: Intent-to treat (ITT) population for Group B patients consisted of all patients randomized in Group B that received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline assessment. The Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) was used to impute missing data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Group B: Ranibizumab 0.3 mgMean Change From Baseline in Total Area of Choroidal Neovascularization of the Study Eye in Group BMean change from Baseline at Month 3 [N=34, 40]-0.10 disc areasStandard Deviation 0.95
Group B: Ranibizumab 0.3 mgMean Change From Baseline in Total Area of Choroidal Neovascularization of the Study Eye in Group BMean change from Baseline at Month 9 [N=34, 40]-0.23 disc areasStandard Deviation 0.97
Group B: Ranibizumab 0.3 mgMean Change From Baseline in Total Area of Choroidal Neovascularization of the Study Eye in Group BMean change from Baseline at Month 6 [N=34, 40]-0.15 disc areasStandard Deviation 0.97
Group B: Ranibizumab 0.3 mgMean Change From Baseline in Total Area of Choroidal Neovascularization of the Study Eye in Group BMean change from Baseline at Month 12 [N=34, 40]-0.16 disc areasStandard Deviation 1.01
Group B: Ranibizumab 0.3 mgMean Change From Baseline in Total Area of Choroidal Neovascularization of the Study Eye in Group BBaseline [N=35, 41]2.11 disc areasStandard Deviation 1.1
Group B: Ranibizumab 0.5 mgMean Change From Baseline in Total Area of Choroidal Neovascularization of the Study Eye in Group BMean change from Baseline at Month 12 [N=34, 40]0.23 disc areasStandard Deviation 1.08
Group B: Ranibizumab 0.5 mgMean Change From Baseline in Total Area of Choroidal Neovascularization of the Study Eye in Group BBaseline [N=35, 41]2.03 disc areasStandard Deviation 1.66
Group B: Ranibizumab 0.5 mgMean Change From Baseline in Total Area of Choroidal Neovascularization of the Study Eye in Group BMean change from Baseline at Month 3 [N=34, 40]0.13 disc areasStandard Deviation 0.75
Group B: Ranibizumab 0.5 mgMean Change From Baseline in Total Area of Choroidal Neovascularization of the Study Eye in Group BMean change from Baseline at Month 6 [N=34, 40]0.04 disc areasStandard Deviation 0.76
Group B: Ranibizumab 0.5 mgMean Change From Baseline in Total Area of Choroidal Neovascularization of the Study Eye in Group BMean change from Baseline at Month 9 [N=34, 40]0.21 disc areasStandard Deviation 0.9
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline in Total Area of Leakage From CNV Plus Staining of Retinal Pigment Epithelium of the Study Eye in Group B

Area of leakage from CNV plus staining of retinal pigment epithelium was assessed by fluorescein angiography in conjunction with color fundus photography. Analysis was performed by the central reading center. The total area is expressed as Macular Photocoagulation Study standard Disc Areas (DA; equivalent to 2.54 mm\^2 on the retina).

Time frame: Baseline, Months 3, 6, 9 and 12

Population: Intent-to treat (ITT) population for Group B patients consisted of all patients randomized in Group B that received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline assessment. The Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) was used to impute missing data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Group B: Ranibizumab 0.3 mgMean Change From Baseline in Total Area of Leakage From CNV Plus Staining of Retinal Pigment Epithelium of the Study Eye in Group BMean change from Baseline at Month 3 [N=34, 40]-0.76 disc areasStandard Deviation 0.85
Group B: Ranibizumab 0.3 mgMean Change From Baseline in Total Area of Leakage From CNV Plus Staining of Retinal Pigment Epithelium of the Study Eye in Group BMean change from Baseline at Month 9 [N=34, 40]-1.39 disc areasStandard Deviation 1.02
Group B: Ranibizumab 0.3 mgMean Change From Baseline in Total Area of Leakage From CNV Plus Staining of Retinal Pigment Epithelium of the Study Eye in Group BMean change from Baseline at Month 6 [N=34, 40]-1.21 disc areasStandard Deviation 0.87
Group B: Ranibizumab 0.3 mgMean Change From Baseline in Total Area of Leakage From CNV Plus Staining of Retinal Pigment Epithelium of the Study Eye in Group BMean change from Baseline at Month 12 [N=34, 40]-1.50 disc areasStandard Deviation 1.08
Group B: Ranibizumab 0.3 mgMean Change From Baseline in Total Area of Leakage From CNV Plus Staining of Retinal Pigment Epithelium of the Study Eye in Group BBaseline [N=35, 41]2.31 disc areasStandard Deviation 1.17
Group B: Ranibizumab 0.5 mgMean Change From Baseline in Total Area of Leakage From CNV Plus Staining of Retinal Pigment Epithelium of the Study Eye in Group BMean change from Baseline at Month 12 [N=34, 40]-1.39 disc areasStandard Deviation 1.48
Group B: Ranibizumab 0.5 mgMean Change From Baseline in Total Area of Leakage From CNV Plus Staining of Retinal Pigment Epithelium of the Study Eye in Group BBaseline [N=35, 41]2.49 disc areasStandard Deviation 1.54
Group B: Ranibizumab 0.5 mgMean Change From Baseline in Total Area of Leakage From CNV Plus Staining of Retinal Pigment Epithelium of the Study Eye in Group BMean change from Baseline at Month 3 [N=34, 40]-0.74 disc areasStandard Deviation 1.21
Group B: Ranibizumab 0.5 mgMean Change From Baseline in Total Area of Leakage From CNV Plus Staining of Retinal Pigment Epithelium of the Study Eye in Group BMean change from Baseline at Month 6 [N=34, 40]-1.10 disc areasStandard Deviation 1.19
Group B: Ranibizumab 0.5 mgMean Change From Baseline in Total Area of Leakage From CNV Plus Staining of Retinal Pigment Epithelium of the Study Eye in Group BMean change from Baseline at Month 9 [N=34, 40]-1.26 disc areasStandard Deviation 1.45
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline in Total Retinal Volume of the Study Eye in Group B

Total retinal volume was assessed by Optical Coherence tomography (OCT) at a subset of the study sites and was analyzed by the central reading center.

Time frame: Baseline, Months 3, 6, 9 and 12

Population: OCT was performed in a total of 58 patients at selected sites. Group B Intent-to treat (ITT) population, observed data only are included. The assessed sample size was small for total retinal volume data because the central reading center judged Can not grade due to retinal pigment epithelium disruption associated with CNV secondary to AMD.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Group B: Ranibizumab 0.3 mgMean Change From Baseline in Total Retinal Volume of the Study Eye in Group BMean change from Baseline at Month 3 [N=7, 7]-0.78 micrometersStandard Deviation 0.74
Group B: Ranibizumab 0.3 mgMean Change From Baseline in Total Retinal Volume of the Study Eye in Group BMean change from Baseline at Month 9 [N=4, 5]-0.48 micrometersStandard Deviation 0.03
Group B: Ranibizumab 0.3 mgMean Change From Baseline in Total Retinal Volume of the Study Eye in Group BBaseline [N=11, 11]7.23 micrometersStandard Deviation 0.84
Group B: Ranibizumab 0.3 mgMean Change From Baseline in Total Retinal Volume of the Study Eye in Group BMean change from Baseline at Month 12 [N=6, 6]-0.95 micrometersStandard Deviation 1.14
Group B: Ranibizumab 0.3 mgMean Change From Baseline in Total Retinal Volume of the Study Eye in Group BMean change from Baseline at Month 6 [N=6, 6]-0.52 micrometersStandard Deviation 0.6
Group B: Ranibizumab 0.5 mgMean Change From Baseline in Total Retinal Volume of the Study Eye in Group BMean change from Baseline at Month 12 [N=6, 6]-0.42 micrometersStandard Deviation 0.67
Group B: Ranibizumab 0.5 mgMean Change From Baseline in Total Retinal Volume of the Study Eye in Group BBaseline [N=11, 11]7.36 micrometersStandard Deviation 0.97
Group B: Ranibizumab 0.5 mgMean Change From Baseline in Total Retinal Volume of the Study Eye in Group BMean change from Baseline at Month 3 [N=7, 7]-0.67 micrometersStandard Deviation 0.71
Group B: Ranibizumab 0.5 mgMean Change From Baseline in Total Retinal Volume of the Study Eye in Group BMean change from Baseline at Month 6 [N=6, 6]-0.92 micrometersStandard Deviation 0.96
Group B: Ranibizumab 0.5 mgMean Change From Baseline in Total Retinal Volume of the Study Eye in Group BMean change from Baseline at Month 9 [N=4, 5]-0.28 micrometersStandard Deviation 0.83
Secondary

Percentage of Participants in Group B With Absence of Leakage in the Study Eye at Month 3, 6, 9 and 12.

Area of leakage was assessed by fluorescein angiography in conjunction with color fundus photography. Analysis was performed at the central reading center.

Time frame: Months 3, 6, 9 and 12

Population: Intent-to treat (ITT) population for Group B patients consisted of all patients randomized in Group B that received at least one dose of study drug and for whom data was available. The Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) was used to impute missing data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Group B: Ranibizumab 0.3 mgPercentage of Participants in Group B With Absence of Leakage in the Study Eye at Month 3, 6, 9 and 12.Month 32.9 Percentage of participants
Group B: Ranibizumab 0.3 mgPercentage of Participants in Group B With Absence of Leakage in the Study Eye at Month 3, 6, 9 and 12.Month 926.5 Percentage of participants
Group B: Ranibizumab 0.3 mgPercentage of Participants in Group B With Absence of Leakage in the Study Eye at Month 3, 6, 9 and 12.Month 1235.3 Percentage of participants
Group B: Ranibizumab 0.3 mgPercentage of Participants in Group B With Absence of Leakage in the Study Eye at Month 3, 6, 9 and 12.Month 68.8 Percentage of participants
Group B: Ranibizumab 0.5 mgPercentage of Participants in Group B With Absence of Leakage in the Study Eye at Month 3, 6, 9 and 12.Month 1235.0 Percentage of participants
Group B: Ranibizumab 0.5 mgPercentage of Participants in Group B With Absence of Leakage in the Study Eye at Month 3, 6, 9 and 12.Month 37.5 Percentage of participants
Group B: Ranibizumab 0.5 mgPercentage of Participants in Group B With Absence of Leakage in the Study Eye at Month 3, 6, 9 and 12.Month 615.0 Percentage of participants
Group B: Ranibizumab 0.5 mgPercentage of Participants in Group B With Absence of Leakage in the Study Eye at Month 3, 6, 9 and 12.Month 925.0 Percentage of participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026