Skip to content

Safety and Efficacy of Ranibizumab in Diabetic Macular Edema With Center Involvement

A Randomized, Double-masked, Multi-center, Phase II Study Assessing the Safety and Efficacy of Two Concentrations of Ranibizumab (Intravitreal Injections) Compared With Non-treatment Control for the Treatment of Diabetic Macular Edema With Center Involvement

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00284050
Acronym
RESOLVE
Enrollment
151
Registered
2006-01-31
Start date
2005-10-31
Completion date
2008-06-30
Last updated
2011-02-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Diabetic Macular Edema

Keywords

DME, Diabetic macular edema, ranibizumab, Diabetic macular edema with center involvement

Brief summary

This study evaluated the safety and efficacy of ranibizumab on retinal edema and visual acuity in patients with diabetic macular edema with center involvement.

Interventions

6 mg/ml ranibizumab solution for intravitreal injection

10 mg/ml ranibizumab solution for intravitreal injection

DRUGSham injection

Non-treatment control for sham intravitreal injection.

Sponsors

Novartis
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Diabetic macular edema with center involvement in at least one eye * Type 1 or type 2 diabetes mellitus diagnosed 2 years prior to screening * Laser photocoagulation in the study eye can be withheld for at least 3 months after randomization

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with uncontrolled systemic or ocular diseases * Have any history of any intraocular surgery in the study eye within the past 6 months preceding screening * Conditions that require chronic concomitant therapy with systemic or topical ocular corticosteroids Other protocol-defined inclusion/

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Difference Between the Baseline Level of Visual Acuity (Letters) of the Study Eye and the Mean Visual Acuity Averaged Over All Monthly Post-baseline Assessments From Month 1 to Month 12Baseline through the end of study (Month 12)Visual acuity (VA) was assessed on both eyes during every study visit using best correction determined from protocol refraction. VA measurements were performed with the patient in a sitting position using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS)-like visual acuity testing charts at a testing distance of 4 meters as described in the Study Operations Manual.
Mean Change From Baseline in Visual Acuity (Letters) of the Study Eye at Month 12Baseline through the end of study (Month 12)Visual acuity (VA) was assessed on both eyes during every study visit using best correction determined from protocol refraction. VA measurements were performed with the patient in a sitting position using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS)-like visual acuity testing charts at a testing distance of 4 meters as described in the Study Operations Manual.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean Change From Baseline in Central Retinal Thickness (µm) of the Study Eye at Month 12Baseline through the end of study (Month 12)Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) was assessed on both eyes at every study visit. These assessments were performed by trained personnel at the sites. OCT imaging was performed using the Zeiss Humphrey System Model 2000 (or later) with version A6.1 software running under Windows 95 or Windows 98. The analysis of the OCT images were performed by the Photographic Reading Center which provided a study manual and training materials. OCT operators, systems and software were certified prior to any evaluation of study patients.

Countries

Switzerland

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Ranibizumab 0.3 mg
Participants received monthly intravitreal injections with 0.3 mg ranibizumab (6 mg/ml) for up to 12 months. At each monthly visit from month 1 and onwards, the evaluating physician decided whether an increase in the dose to 0.6 mg was needed according to set criteria. If the dose was increased, all subsequent administrations were of the higher dose unless treatment had been withheld for more than 45 days (for any reason), in which case injections restarted with the initial dose. Laser photocoagulation was permitted as rescue treatment for the study eye after 3 consecutive monthly injections.
51
Ranibizumab 0.5 mg
Participants received monthly intravitreal injections with 0.5 mg ranibizumab (10 mg/ml) for up to 12 months. At each monthly visit from month 1 and onwards, the evaluating physician decided whether an increase in the dose to 1.0 mg was needed according to set criteria. If the dose was increased, all subsequent administrations were of the higher dose unless treatment had been withheld for more than 45 days (for any reason), in which case injections restarted with the initial dose. Laser photocoagulation was permitted as rescue treatment for the study eye after 3 consecutive monthly injections.
51
Sham Injection
Participants in the control group received 12 monthly sham intravitreal injections. The evaluation was performed using the same criteria for dose doubling as in active treatment groups. The injection was a mimicked by an empty syringe without a needle. Laser photocoagulation was permitted as rescue treatment for the study eye after 3 consecutive monthly injections.
49
Total151

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Overall StudyAdverse Event111
Overall StudyDeath100
Overall StudyLack of Efficacy013
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up101
Overall StudyProtocol Violation012
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject222

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicRanibizumab 0.3 mgRanibizumab 0.5 mgSham InjectionTotal
Age Continuous63.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.44
62.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.14
65.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.26
63.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.95
Sex: Female, Male
Female
22 Participants24 Participants24 Participants70 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
29 Participants27 Participants25 Participants81 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
37 / 5143 / 5132 / 49
serious
Total, serious adverse events
9 / 519 / 519 / 49

Outcome results

Primary

Difference Between the Baseline Level of Visual Acuity (Letters) of the Study Eye and the Mean Visual Acuity Averaged Over All Monthly Post-baseline Assessments From Month 1 to Month 12

Visual acuity (VA) was assessed on both eyes during every study visit using best correction determined from protocol refraction. VA measurements were performed with the patient in a sitting position using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS)-like visual acuity testing charts at a testing distance of 4 meters as described in the Study Operations Manual.

Time frame: Baseline through the end of study (Month 12)

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS): All patients who received at least one application of study treatment and had at least one post-baseline assessment for BCVA. A Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) approach was used; missing values were replaced by the mean of the last observation before and the first observation after the missing time-point.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Ranibizumab 0.3 mgDifference Between the Baseline Level of Visual Acuity (Letters) of the Study Eye and the Mean Visual Acuity Averaged Over All Monthly Post-baseline Assessments From Month 1 to Month 129.2 LettersStandard Deviation 5.6
Ranibizumab 0.5 mgDifference Between the Baseline Level of Visual Acuity (Letters) of the Study Eye and the Mean Visual Acuity Averaged Over All Monthly Post-baseline Assessments From Month 1 to Month 126.4 LettersStandard Deviation 9.21
Sham InjectionDifference Between the Baseline Level of Visual Acuity (Letters) of the Study Eye and the Mean Visual Acuity Averaged Over All Monthly Post-baseline Assessments From Month 1 to Month 12-0.1 LettersStandard Deviation 9.77
Primary

Mean Change From Baseline in Visual Acuity (Letters) of the Study Eye at Month 12

Visual acuity (VA) was assessed on both eyes during every study visit using best correction determined from protocol refraction. VA measurements were performed with the patient in a sitting position using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS)-like visual acuity testing charts at a testing distance of 4 meters as described in the Study Operations Manual.

Time frame: Baseline through the end of study (Month 12)

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS): All patients who received at least one application of study treatment and had at least one post-baseline assessment for BCVA. A Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) approach was used; missing values were replaced by the mean of the last observation before and the first observation after the missing time-point.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Ranibizumab 0.3 mgMean Change From Baseline in Visual Acuity (Letters) of the Study Eye at Month 1211.8 LettersStandard Deviation 6.59
Ranibizumab 0.5 mgMean Change From Baseline in Visual Acuity (Letters) of the Study Eye at Month 128.8 LettersStandard Deviation 10.99
Sham InjectionMean Change From Baseline in Visual Acuity (Letters) of the Study Eye at Month 12-1.4 LettersStandard Deviation 14.16
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline in Central Retinal Thickness (µm) of the Study Eye at Month 12

Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) was assessed on both eyes at every study visit. These assessments were performed by trained personnel at the sites. OCT imaging was performed using the Zeiss Humphrey System Model 2000 (or later) with version A6.1 software running under Windows 95 or Windows 98. The analysis of the OCT images were performed by the Photographic Reading Center which provided a study manual and training materials. OCT operators, systems and software were certified prior to any evaluation of study patients.

Time frame: Baseline through the end of study (Month 12)

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS): All patients who received at least one application of study treatment and had at least one post-baseline assessment for BCVA. A Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) approach was used; missing values were replaced by the mean of the last observation before and the first observation after the missing time-point.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Ranibizumab 0.3 mgMean Change From Baseline in Central Retinal Thickness (µm) of the Study Eye at Month 12-200.7 µmStandard Deviation 122.18
Ranibizumab 0.5 mgMean Change From Baseline in Central Retinal Thickness (µm) of the Study Eye at Month 12-187.6 µmStandard Deviation 147.82
Sham InjectionMean Change From Baseline in Central Retinal Thickness (µm) of the Study Eye at Month 12-48.4 µmStandard Deviation 153.43

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 9, 2026