Skip to content

A Description of Inflammatory Cell Types In Moderate to Severe Pediatric Asthma: Eosinophilic and Non Eosinophilic Sputum Markers While on Anti-IgE Therapy

A Description of Inflammatory Cell Types in Moderate to Severe Pediatric Asthma: Eosinophilic and Non Eosinophilic Sputum Markers While on Anti-IgE Therapy (Xolair)

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00283504
Enrollment
13
Registered
2006-01-30
Start date
2006-01-31
Completion date
2009-01-31
Last updated
2018-02-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

ALLERGIC ASTHMA

Brief summary

The researcher proposes to assess levels of sputum inflammatory markers (eosinophils, eosinophil cationic protein (ECP), neutrophils IL-8) before and while on anti-IgE therapy in a pediatric population of moderate to severe asthmatics who have ongoing persistent asthma symptoms despite on moderate to high doses of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS). Associations will be assessed between the types of sputum inflammatory markers and the patient's atopic status and level of asthma control as indicated by the following measures: 1. pulmonary function test (PFT) 2. asthma symptoms based on the Asthma Control Test (ACT)

Detailed description

Objectives: Primary: Describe inflammatory cell types in study patients and compare changes in inflammatory cell patterns before and during anti-IgE therapy. Secondary:Describe patterns of sputum eosinophilia and neutrophilia in relation to asthma symptom improvement based on ACT and PFT Hypotheses: Differences in inflammatory response after the addition of anti-IgE therapy can be described in neutrophilic, eosinophilic and neutrophilic/eosinophilic asthmatics. Neutrophilic asthmatics patients will fail to respond when placed on anti-IgE while eosinophilic asthmatics will respond well. Sputum inflammatory markers are sensitive markers of inflammation and can predict response to new asthma treatment modalities such as anti-IgE therapy.

Interventions

DRUGANTI-IGE THERAPY (XOLAIR)

Xolair dosing is based on body weight and baseline serum total IgE concentration(0.016 x kg body weight x IgE levels), with a maximum dose per 4 weeks of 750mg.Depending on their weight and IgE levels, patients get their Xolair shots every 2 or every 4 weeks.

Sponsors

Novartis
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Genentech, Inc.
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Children's Hospital of The King's Daughters
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
8 Years to 18 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Moderate to severe allergic asthma, uncontrolled on conventional therapy

Exclusion criteria

* History of systemic illness, currently on other immune modulators like immunotherapy, IVIg * Pregnancy * IgE level \>1300

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With Change in Sputum Markers by End of Study32 weekssputum markers were classified as eosinophilic or non eosinophilic

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With Response to Therapy Based on Clinical Parameters Such as ED Visits, Hospitalizations, Systemic Steroid Use and Symptom Control32 weeks
Number Participants for Whom Sputum Induction Was Safeevery 4 weeks up to 32 weekssafety was assessed by measuring FEV1 levels before and after sputum induction; induction was considered safe if FEV1 levels remained the same or improved

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Eosinophilic Phenotype
participants received Xolair per standard clinical practice
7
Non Eosinophilic Phenotype
participants received Xolair per standard clinical practice
6
Total13

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicEosinophilic PhenotypeNon Eosinophilic PhenotypeTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
7 Participants6 Participants13 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
asthma severity
moderate
2 Participants4 Participants6 Participants
asthma severity
severe
5 Participants2 Participants7 Participants
number of participants with eosinophilic or non eosinophilic (neutrophilic) sputum
eosinophilic sputum
7 Participants0 Participants7 Participants
number of participants with eosinophilic or non eosinophilic (neutrophilic) sputum
neutrophilic sputum
0 Participants6 Participants6 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
7 Participants4 Participants11 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
0 Participants2 Participants2 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
7 Participants6 Participants13 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
2 Participants2 Participants4 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
5 Participants4 Participants9 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 70 / 6
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 70 / 6
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 70 / 6

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Participants With Change in Sputum Markers by End of Study

sputum markers were classified as eosinophilic or non eosinophilic

Time frame: 32 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Eosinophilic PhenotypeNumber of Participants With Change in Sputum Markers by End of Study0 Participants
Non Eosinophilic PhenotypeNumber of Participants With Change in Sputum Markers by End of Study0 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Response to Therapy Based on Clinical Parameters Such as ED Visits, Hospitalizations, Systemic Steroid Use and Symptom Control

Time frame: 32 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Eosinophilic PhenotypeNumber of Participants With Response to Therapy Based on Clinical Parameters Such as ED Visits, Hospitalizations, Systemic Steroid Use and Symptom Control7 Participants
Non Eosinophilic PhenotypeNumber of Participants With Response to Therapy Based on Clinical Parameters Such as ED Visits, Hospitalizations, Systemic Steroid Use and Symptom Control6 Participants
Secondary

Number Participants for Whom Sputum Induction Was Safe

safety was assessed by measuring FEV1 levels before and after sputum induction; induction was considered safe if FEV1 levels remained the same or improved

Time frame: every 4 weeks up to 32 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Eosinophilic PhenotypeNumber Participants for Whom Sputum Induction Was Safe7 Participants
Non Eosinophilic PhenotypeNumber Participants for Whom Sputum Induction Was Safe6 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026