Skip to content

Sleep Apnea Treatment After Stroke (SATS)

Treatment of Obstructive Sleep Apnea After Stroke

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00282815
Enrollment
32
Registered
2006-01-27
Start date
2004-09-30
Completion date
2010-05-31
Last updated
2013-03-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Obstructive Sleep Apnea, Stroke

Keywords

obstructive sleep apnea, stroke, OSA, CPAP, continuous positive airway pressure

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to determine if treating stroke patients who have obstructive sleep apnea with continuous positive airway pressure will improve symptoms caused by the stroke.

Detailed description

Stroke is the leading cause of adult disability in the United States, yet there are very few treatments that improve stroke outcome. Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA)--frequent upper airway blockage that occurs during sleep--is common after stroke, affecting more than half of stroke patients. The most common treatment for obstructive sleep apnea in the general population is nasal continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) applied through a nasal mask during the hours of sleep. Positive air pressure holds the naso-oro-pharyngeal airway open during sleep. The objective of this single-center, prospective, randomized study is to evaluate CPAP treatment in post-stroke patients. Participants will go through a medical interview, a brief neurological examination, and a sleep study to screen them for OSA. Those with OSA will be eligible for the second phase of the study during which participants will be randomly selected to receive either treatment with CPAP or with sham CPAP (placebo). This project promises to establish feasibility, develop design and identify suitable outcome measures (e.g. hours of CPAP treatment per week, functional outcome, depression, fatigue, and impaired alertness) for a large-scale clinical trial of CPAP in stroke patients with OSA. If the larger trial shows benefits of CPAP, a new treatment for more than half of all stroke patients will become available.

Interventions

DEVICEcontinuous positive airway pressure or CPAP

RemStar Pro (Respironics, Inc.) The CPAP is applied through a nasal mask during the hours of sleep. Positive air pressure holds the naso-oro-pharyngeal airway open during sleep.

DEVICEsham CPAP

sham CPAP

Sponsors

University of Michigan
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Ischemic stroke within 7 days of planned polysomnography/sleep screening study * Modified Rankin Scale score \>1 * If of child-bearing potential, has a negative urine or serum pregnancy test

Exclusion criteria

* Decompensated heart failure * Cardiac or respiratory arrest within the past 3 months * Myocardial infarction within the past 3 months * Severe pneumonia * Hypertension refractory to treatment * Any other unstable medical condition which is thought to interfere with participation * Known preexisting OSA already on CPAP or previously failed CPAP or used CPAP * Previous pneumothorax * Bullous emphysema * Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), obesity-hypoventilation, or another condition warranting the use of nasal bilevel positive airway pressure instead of CPAP * Acute sinus or ear infection

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Cumulative Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP)/Sham CPAP Usage Hours Over the 3 Month Period.3 months
Number of Subjects Who Withdraw From Study.3 monthsPrespecified outcome.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Barthel Index3 monthsBarthel Index score range: 0 (worst, fully dependent) - 100 (best, independent).

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Patients enrolled from inpatient neurology service.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Active Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP)15
Sham Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP)
Subtherapeutic CPAP
17
Total32

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicSham Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP)Active Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP)Total
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
12 Participants7 Participants19 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
5 Participants8 Participants13 Participants
Age Continuous74 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16
61 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16
65 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16
Region of Enrollment
United States
17 participants15 participants32 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
4 Participants10 Participants14 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
13 Participants5 Participants18 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 150 / 17
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 150 / 17

Outcome results

Primary

Cumulative Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP)/Sham CPAP Usage Hours Over the 3 Month Period.

Time frame: 3 months

Population: Data not available on one sham participant (lowering n from 11 to 10 in the shame group).

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Active CPAPCumulative Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP)/Sham CPAP Usage Hours Over the 3 Month Period.53 Hours/participant
Sham CPAPCumulative Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP)/Sham CPAP Usage Hours Over the 3 Month Period.74 Hours/participant
Primary

Number of Subjects Who Withdraw From Study.

Prespecified outcome.

Time frame: 3 months

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Active CPAPNumber of Subjects Who Withdraw From Study.13 participants
Secondary

Barthel Index

Barthel Index score range: 0 (worst, fully dependent) - 100 (best, independent).

Time frame: 3 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Active CPAPBarthel Index95 units on a scale (range 0-100)
Sham CPAPBarthel Index100 units on a scale (range 0-100)

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026