Skip to content

A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Rituximab in Subjects With International Society of Nephrology/Renal Pathology Society (ISN/RPS) 2003 Class III or IV Lupus Nephritis

A Phase III, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Rituximab in Subjects With ISN/RPS Class III or IV Lupus Nephritis

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00282347
Acronym
LUNAR
Enrollment
144
Registered
2006-01-26
Start date
2006-01-31
Completion date
2013-01-31
Last updated
2015-01-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Lupus Nephritis

Keywords

Class IV LN, Lupus, LUNAR, LN

Brief summary

This was a Phase III, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of rituximab in combination with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) compared with placebo in combination with MMF in subjects diagnosed with International Society of Nephrology/Renal Pathology Society (ISN/RPS) 2003 Class III or IV lupus nephritis.

Detailed description

In addition to receiving study drug (rituximab or placebo), participants in each treatment group received mycophenolate mofetil at a starting dose of 1500 mg/day IV in 3 divided doses and were titrated up by 500 mg/week to 3000 mg/day by Week 4, as tolerated. Participants in each treatment group also received methylprednisolone 1000 mg IV prior to and 3 days following the first study drug infusion and methylprednisolone 100 mg IV prior to the other study drug infusions. Participants in each treatment group also received diphenhydramine 50 mg orally and acetaminophen 1000 mg orally 30-60 minutes prior to each study drug infusion. From Days 2 to 16, participants in each treatment group received prednisone 0.75 mg/kg/day orally (maximum dose of 60 mg) except on the day of the second methylprednisolone dose. On Day 16, a taper was initiated to achieve a dose of 10 mg/day by Week 16.

Interventions

DRUGRituximab

Rituximab was provided as a sterile solution for injection.

DRUGPlacebo

Placebo was provided as a sterile solution for injection.

DRUGMycophenolate mofetil
DRUGMethylprednisolone
DRUGDiphenhydramine
DRUGAcetaminophen
DRUGPrednisone

Sponsors

Genentech, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
16 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Diagnosis of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) according to current American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria. * Diagnosis of International Society of Nephrology/Renal Pathology Society (ISN/RPS) 2003 Class III or IV lupus nephritis (LN), with either active or active/chronic disease. * Proteinuria. * 16-75 years of age.

Exclusion criteria

* Retinitis, poorly controlled seizure disorder, acute confusional state, myelitis, stroke or stroke syndrome, cerebellar ataxia, or dementia that is currently active and resulting from SLE. * Unstable subjects with thrombocytopenia experiencing or at high risk for developing clinically significant bleeding or organ dysfunction requiring therapies such as plasmapheresis or acute blood or platelet transfusions. * Lack of peripheral venous access. * Pregnancy or lactation. * History of severe allergic or anaphylactic reactions to monoclonal antibodies. * Significant or uncontrolled medical disease in any organ system not related to SLE or LN, which, in the investigator's opinion, would preclude subject participation. * Concomitant chronic conditions, excluding SLE (eg, asthma, Crohn's disease) that require oral or systemic corticosteroid use in the 52 weeks prior to screening. * History of renal transplant. * Known human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection. * Known active infection of any kind (but excluding fungal infection of nail beds) or any major episode of infection requiring hospitalization or treatment with intravenous anti-infectives within 4 weeks of randomization or oral anti-infectives within 2 weeks of randomization. * History of deep space infection within 1 year of screening. * History of serious recurrent or chronic infection. * History of cancer, including solid tumors, hematological malignancies, and carcinoma in situ (except basal cell carcinomas of the skin that have been treated or excised and have resolved). * Currently active alcohol or drug abuse or history of alcohol or drug abuse within 52 weeks prior to screening. * Major surgery requiring hospitalization within 4 weeks of screening (excluding diagnostic surgery). * Treatment with cyclophosphamide or calcineurin inhibitors within the 90 days prior to screening. * Use of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) at a dose of \> 2 grams daily for longer than the 90 days prior to screening. * Intolerance or history of allergic reaction to MMF. * Intolerance or history of allergic reaction to both angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and angiotensin-receptor blockers. * Use of oral prednisone (or corticosteroid equivalent) at a dose of \> 20 mg/day for longer than the 14 days prior to screening. * Previous treatment with CAMPATH-1H (alemtuzumab). * Previous treatment with a B-cell targeted therapy. * Treatment with any investigational agent (including biologic agents approved for other indications) within 28 days of the start of the screening period or 5 half-lives of the investigational drug (whichever is longer). * Receipt of a live vaccine within the 28 days prior to screening. * Intolerance or contraindication to oral or IV corticosteroids. * Current therapy with a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agent. * Positive hepatitis B sAg or hepatitis C serology.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Complete Renal Response (CRR), a Partial Renal Response (PRR), or no Renal Response (NRR) at Week 52Week 52A participant had a CRR if they met the following 3 criteria: (1) Normalization of serum creatinine (SC) as evidenced by a SC level ≤ the upper limit of the normal range of central laboratory values or a SC level ≤ 15% greater than Baseline, if Baseline SC was within the normal range of the central laboratory values; (2) Inactive urinary sediment (as evidenced by \< 5 red blood cells/high-power field (RBCs/HPF) and absence of red cell casts; (3) Urinary protein (UP) to creatinine ratio (CR) \< 0.5. A participant had a PRR if they met the following 3 criteria: (1) A SC level ≤ 15% above Baseline; (2) RBCs/HPF ≤ 50% above Baseline and no RBC casts; (3) 50% improvement in the UP to CR, with 1 of the following conditions met: If the Baseline UP to CR was ≤ 3.0, then a UP to CR of \< 1.0 or if the Baseline UP to CR was \> 3.0, then a UP to CR of ≤ 3.0. A participant had a NRR if they did not achieve either a CRR or PRR.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Complete Renal Response at Week 52Week 52A participant had a complete renal response if they met the following 3 criteria: (1) Normalization of serum creatinine as evidenced by a serum creatinine level ≤ the upper limit of the normal range of central laboratory values or a serum creatinine level ≤ 15% greater than Baseline, if Baseline serum creatinine was within the normal range of the central laboratory values; (2) Inactive urinary sediment (as evidenced by \< 5 red blood cells/high-power field and absence of red cell casts; (3) Urinary protein to creatinine ratio \< 0.5.
Percentage of Participants With a Baseline Urine Protein to Creatinine Ratio of > 3.0 Who Achieved a Urine Protein to Creatinine Ratio of < 1.0 at Week 52Baseline to Week 52
British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) Index Score Over 52 WeeksBaseline to Week 52The BILAG Index assesses 86 clinical signs and symptoms and laboratory measures of systemic lupus erythematosus in 8 organ system domains: General, mucocutaneous, neurological, musculoskeletal, cardiorespiratory, vasculitis, renal, and hematologic. Most of the 86 items are rated on the following scale: 0=Not present, 1=Improving, 2=Same, 3=Worse, 4=New. Some items are rated as either Yes or No. A single alphabetic score of A (very active) through E (not or never active) for each of the 8 domains is determined from the rating of the individual items in each domain. The total BILAG score is the sum of the scores of the 8 domains where A=9, B=3, C=1, D=0, and E=0. The total score ranges from 0 to 72 with a higher score indicating greater lupus activity. To calculate a BILAG score over the 52 week treatment period of the study, the area under the response-time curve of BILAG scores assessed every 4 weeks was divided by the number of days in the time curve minus the Baseline BILAG score.
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Complete Renal Response at Week 24 and Maintained it to Week 52Week 24 to Week 52A participant had a complete renal response if they met the following 3 criteria: (1) Normalization of serum creatinine as evidenced by a serum creatinine level ≤ the upper limit of the normal range of central laboratory values or a serum creatinine level ≤ 15% greater than Baseline, if Baseline serum creatinine was within the normal range of the central laboratory values; (2) Inactive urinary sediment (as evidenced by \< 5 red blood cells/high-power field and absence of red cell casts; (3) Urinary protein to creatinine ratio \< 0.5.
Change From Baseline in the Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Expanded Health Survey Physical Function Score at Week 52Baseline to Week 52The systemic lupus erythematosus Expanded Health Survey is based on the Short Form 36 Health survey with additional questions specific to lupus. The physical function component score of the survey can range from 0-100. A higher score indicates better health. A positive change score indicates improvement.
Change From Baseline in Anti-double-stranded DNA at Week 52Baseline to Week 52
Change From Baseline in C3 and C4 Complement Levels at Week 52Baseline to Week 52
Time to Achieve a Complete Renal ResponseBaseline to Week 52

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Rituximab
Participants received rituximab 1000 mg intravenously (IV) on Days 1, 15, 168, and 182. They also received mycophenolate mofetil, methylprednisolone, diphenhydramine, acetaminophen, and prednisone; see the Detailed Description for details.
72
Placebo
Participants received placebo intravenously (IV) on Days 1, 15, 168, and 182. They also received mycophenolate mofetil, methylprednisolone, diphenhydramine, acetaminophen, and prednisone; see the Detailed Description for details.
72
Total144

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
B Cell Follow-up PeriodPhysician Decision10
B Cell Follow-up PeriodReason Not Specified20
B Cell Follow-up PeriodWithdrawal by Subject20
Safety Follow-up PeriodLost to Follow-up02
Safety Follow-up PeriodPhysician Decision11
Safety Follow-up PeriodProtocol Deviation02
Safety Follow-up PeriodWithdrawal by Subject21
Treatment PeriodDeath20
Treatment PeriodLost to Follow-up25
Treatment PeriodPhysician Decision01
Treatment PeriodWithdrawal by Subject13

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicRituximabPlaceboTotal
Age, Continuous31.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.6
29.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.3
30.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.5
Age, Customized
18 to < 35 years
48 participants48 participants96 participants
Age, Customized
< 18 years
2 participants1 participants3 participants
Age, Customized
35 to < 50 years
18 participants19 participants37 participants
Age, Customized
≥ 50 years
4 participants4 participants8 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
63 Participants67 Participants130 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
9 Participants5 Participants14 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
69 / 7366 / 718 / 200 / 4
serious
Total, serious adverse events
24 / 7329 / 713 / 200 / 4

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Complete Renal Response (CRR), a Partial Renal Response (PRR), or no Renal Response (NRR) at Week 52

A participant had a CRR if they met the following 3 criteria: (1) Normalization of serum creatinine (SC) as evidenced by a SC level ≤ the upper limit of the normal range of central laboratory values or a SC level ≤ 15% greater than Baseline, if Baseline SC was within the normal range of the central laboratory values; (2) Inactive urinary sediment (as evidenced by \< 5 red blood cells/high-power field (RBCs/HPF) and absence of red cell casts; (3) Urinary protein (UP) to creatinine ratio (CR) \< 0.5. A participant had a PRR if they met the following 3 criteria: (1) A SC level ≤ 15% above Baseline; (2) RBCs/HPF ≤ 50% above Baseline and no RBC casts; (3) 50% improvement in the UP to CR, with 1 of the following conditions met: If the Baseline UP to CR was ≤ 3.0, then a UP to CR of \< 1.0 or if the Baseline UP to CR was \> 3.0, then a UP to CR of ≤ 3.0. A participant had a NRR if they did not achieve either a CRR or PRR.

Time frame: Week 52

Population: Intent-to-treat population: All randomized participants who received any amount of study drug (rituximab or placebo).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
RituximabPercentage of Participants Who Achieved a Complete Renal Response (CRR), a Partial Renal Response (PRR), or no Renal Response (NRR) at Week 52CRR26.4 Percentage of participants
RituximabPercentage of Participants Who Achieved a Complete Renal Response (CRR), a Partial Renal Response (PRR), or no Renal Response (NRR) at Week 52PRR30.6 Percentage of participants
RituximabPercentage of Participants Who Achieved a Complete Renal Response (CRR), a Partial Renal Response (PRR), or no Renal Response (NRR) at Week 52NRR43.1 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Who Achieved a Complete Renal Response (CRR), a Partial Renal Response (PRR), or no Renal Response (NRR) at Week 52CRR30.6 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Who Achieved a Complete Renal Response (CRR), a Partial Renal Response (PRR), or no Renal Response (NRR) at Week 52PRR15.3 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Who Achieved a Complete Renal Response (CRR), a Partial Renal Response (PRR), or no Renal Response (NRR) at Week 52NRR54.2 Percentage of participants
p-value: 0.5538Stratified Wilcoxon-Rank Sum Test
Secondary

British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) Index Score Over 52 Weeks

The BILAG Index assesses 86 clinical signs and symptoms and laboratory measures of systemic lupus erythematosus in 8 organ system domains: General, mucocutaneous, neurological, musculoskeletal, cardiorespiratory, vasculitis, renal, and hematologic. Most of the 86 items are rated on the following scale: 0=Not present, 1=Improving, 2=Same, 3=Worse, 4=New. Some items are rated as either Yes or No. A single alphabetic score of A (very active) through E (not or never active) for each of the 8 domains is determined from the rating of the individual items in each domain. The total BILAG score is the sum of the scores of the 8 domains where A=9, B=3, C=1, D=0, and E=0. The total score ranges from 0 to 72 with a higher score indicating greater lupus activity. To calculate a BILAG score over the 52 week treatment period of the study, the area under the response-time curve of BILAG scores assessed every 4 weeks was divided by the number of days in the time curve minus the Baseline BILAG score.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 52

Population: Intent-to-treat population: All randomized participants who received any amount of study drug (rituximab or placebo).

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
RituximabBritish Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) Index Score Over 52 Weeks-8.49 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.79
PlaceboBritish Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) Index Score Over 52 Weeks-8.58 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.14
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Anti-double-stranded DNA at Week 52

Time frame: Baseline to Week 52

Population: Intent-to-treat population: All randomized participants who received any amount of study drug (rituximab or placebo).

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
RituximabChange From Baseline in Anti-double-stranded DNA at Week 520.45 IU/mLStandard Deviation 0.35
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Anti-double-stranded DNA at Week 521.06 IU/mLStandard Deviation 2.19
Secondary

Change From Baseline in C3 and C4 Complement Levels at Week 52

Time frame: Baseline to Week 52

Population: Intent-to-treat population: All randomized participants who received any amount of study drug (rituximab or placebo).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
RituximabChange From Baseline in C3 and C4 Complement Levels at Week 52C3 Complement37.5 mg/dLStandard Deviation 28.7
RituximabChange From Baseline in C3 and C4 Complement Levels at Week 52C4 Complement9.9 mg/dLStandard Deviation 7.5
PlaceboChange From Baseline in C3 and C4 Complement Levels at Week 52C3 Complement25.9 mg/dLStandard Deviation 32.5
PlaceboChange From Baseline in C3 and C4 Complement Levels at Week 52C4 Complement6.6 mg/dLStandard Deviation 8.9
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Expanded Health Survey Physical Function Score at Week 52

The systemic lupus erythematosus Expanded Health Survey is based on the Short Form 36 Health survey with additional questions specific to lupus. The physical function component score of the survey can range from 0-100. A higher score indicates better health. A positive change score indicates improvement.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 52

Population: Intent-to-treat population: All randomized participants who received any amount of study drug (rituximab or placebo).

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
RituximabChange From Baseline in the Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Expanded Health Survey Physical Function Score at Week 524.8 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.4
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Expanded Health Survey Physical Function Score at Week 525.7 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.4
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Complete Renal Response at Week 24 and Maintained it to Week 52

A participant had a complete renal response if they met the following 3 criteria: (1) Normalization of serum creatinine as evidenced by a serum creatinine level ≤ the upper limit of the normal range of central laboratory values or a serum creatinine level ≤ 15% greater than Baseline, if Baseline serum creatinine was within the normal range of the central laboratory values; (2) Inactive urinary sediment (as evidenced by \< 5 red blood cells/high-power field and absence of red cell casts; (3) Urinary protein to creatinine ratio \< 0.5.

Time frame: Week 24 to Week 52

Population: Intent-to-treat population: All randomized participants who received any amount of study drug (rituximab or placebo).

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
RituximabPercentage of Participants Who Achieved a Complete Renal Response at Week 24 and Maintained it to Week 521.4 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Who Achieved a Complete Renal Response at Week 24 and Maintained it to Week 526.9 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Complete Renal Response at Week 52

A participant had a complete renal response if they met the following 3 criteria: (1) Normalization of serum creatinine as evidenced by a serum creatinine level ≤ the upper limit of the normal range of central laboratory values or a serum creatinine level ≤ 15% greater than Baseline, if Baseline serum creatinine was within the normal range of the central laboratory values; (2) Inactive urinary sediment (as evidenced by \< 5 red blood cells/high-power field and absence of red cell casts; (3) Urinary protein to creatinine ratio \< 0.5.

Time frame: Week 52

Population: Intent-to-treat population: All randomized participants who received any amount of study drug (rituximab or placebo).

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
RituximabPercentage of Participants Who Achieved a Complete Renal Response at Week 5226.4 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Who Achieved a Complete Renal Response at Week 5230.6 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With a Baseline Urine Protein to Creatinine Ratio of > 3.0 Who Achieved a Urine Protein to Creatinine Ratio of < 1.0 at Week 52

Time frame: Baseline to Week 52

Population: Intent-to-treat population: All randomized participants who received any amount of study drug (rituximab or placebo). Only those participants with a Baseline urine protein to creatinine ratio of \> 3.0 were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
RituximabPercentage of Participants With a Baseline Urine Protein to Creatinine Ratio of > 3.0 Who Achieved a Urine Protein to Creatinine Ratio of < 1.0 at Week 5247.4 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With a Baseline Urine Protein to Creatinine Ratio of > 3.0 Who Achieved a Urine Protein to Creatinine Ratio of < 1.0 at Week 5253.7 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Time to Achieve a Complete Renal Response

Time frame: Baseline to Week 52

Population: Intent-to-treat population: All randomized participants who received any amount of study drug (rituximab or placebo).

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
RituximabTime to Achieve a Complete Renal Response11.99 Weeks
PlaceboTime to Achieve a Complete Renal Response12.12 Weeks

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 1, 2026