Skip to content

Combination Chemotherapy, Bev, RT, and Erlotinib in Treating Patients With Stage III Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Phase I/II Trial of Induction Carboplatin/Paclitaxel With Bevacizumab Followed by Concurrent Thoracic Conformal Radiation Therapy With Carboplatin/Paclitaxel, Bevacizumab and Erlotinib in Stage IIIA/B Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 1Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00280150
Enrollment
46
Registered
2006-01-20
Start date
2006-01-31
Completion date
2013-01-31
Last updated
2017-06-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Lung Cancer

Keywords

stage IIIA non-small cell lung cancer, stage IIIB non-small cell lung cancer, recurrent non-small cell lung cancer, squamous cell lung cancer

Brief summary

RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as carboplatin and paclitaxel, work in different ways to stop the growth of tumor cells, either by killing the cells or by stopping them from dividing. Monoclonal antibodies, such as bevacizumab, can block tumor growth in different ways. Some block the ability of tumor cells to grow and spread. Others find tumor cells and help kill them or carry tumor-killing substances to them. Bevacizumab may also stop the growth of non-small cell lung cancer by blocking blood flow to the tumor. Radiation therapy uses high energy x-rays to kill tumor cells. Erlotinib may stop the growth of tumor cells by blocking some of the enzymes needed for cell growth. Giving combination chemotherapy together with bevacizumab, radiation therapy, and erlotinib may kill more tumor cells. PURPOSE: This phase I/II trial is studying the side effects and best dose of bevacizumab and erlotinib when given together with combination chemotherapy and radiation therapy and to see how well they work in treating patients with stage III non-small cell lung cancer.

Detailed description

OBJECTIVES: Primary * Determine the maximum tolerated dose of bevacizumab and erlotinib hydrochloride when given together with carboplatin, paclitaxel, and thoracic conformal radiotherapy in patients with stage IIIA or IIIB non-small cell lung cancer. (Phase I \[closed to accrual as of 1/3/2008\]) * Determine the safety and toxicity profile of this regimen in these patients. (Phase I \[closed to accrual as of 1/3/2008\]) * Determine the progression-free survival of patients treated with induction therapy comprising carboplatin, paclitaxel, and bevacizumab followed by chemoradiotherapy comprising thoracic conformal radiotherapy, carboplatin, paclitaxel, bevacizumab, and erlotinib hydrochloride and consolidation therapy comprising bevacizumab and erlotinib hydrochloride. (Phase II) * Determine the overall toxicity profile of this regimen in these patients. (Phase II) Secondary * Determine the response rate in patients treated with induction therapy comprising carboplatin, paclitaxel, and bevacizumab. (Phase I\[closed to accrual as of 1/3/2008\] and II) * Determine the toxicity profile of induction therapy in these patients. (Phase I \[closed to accrual as of 1/3/2008\] and II) * Determine the overall response rate and survival profile in patients treated with this regimen. (Phase I \[closed to accrual as of 1/3/2008\] and II) * Determine the feasibility and tolerability of administering consolidation therapy comprising erlotinib hydrochloride and bevacizumab after treatment with combined modality therapy (induction therapy and chemoradiotherapy) in these patients. (Phase I \[closed to accrual as of 1/3/2008\] and II) * Collect tumor and blood samples from these patients for future analysis of correlation between molecular markers and clinical benefit. (Phase I \[closed to accrual as of 1/3/2008\] and II) OUTLINE: This is a nonrandomized, open-label, controlled, phase I (closed to accrual as of 1/3/2008), dose-escalation study of bevacizumab and erlotinib hydrochloride, followed by a phase II study. * Phase I (closed to accrual as of 1/3/2008): * Induction therapy: Patients receive paclitaxel IV over 3 hours, carboplatin IV over 15-30 minutes, and bevacizumab IV over 30-90 minutes on day 1. Treatment repeats every 21 days for 2 courses. Patients with stable or responding disease proceed to chemoradiotherapy. * Chemoradiotherapy: Patients receive chemoradiotherapy according to their assigned dose cohort: * Cohort 1: Patients undergo thoracic conformal radiotherapy (TCRT) on days 1-5, 8-12, 15-19, 22-26, 29-33, 36-40, and 43-47. Patients also receive carboplatin IV and paclitaxel IV on days 1, 8, 15, 22, 29, 36, and 43 and bevacizumab IV over 30-90 minutes on days 1, 15, 29, and 43. * Cohort 2: Patients undergo TCRT and receive carboplatin, paclitaxel, and bevacizumab as in cohort 1. Patients also receive oral erlotinib hydrochloride on days 2-5, 9-12, 16-19, 23-26, 30-33, 37-40, and 44-47. * Cohort 3: Patients undergo TCRT and receive carboplatin, paclitaxel, and bevacizumab as in cohort 1. Patients also receive higher doses of oral erlotinib hydrochloride on days 2-5, 9-12, 16-19, 23-26, 30-33, 37-40, and 44-47. Cohorts of 5 patients receive chemoradiotherapy as described above until the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) is determined. The MTD is defined as the dose preceding that at which 2 (with grade 4 toxicity) or 3 (with grade 3 toxicity) of 5 patients experience dose-limiting toxicity. Three to 6 weeks after completion of chemoradiotherapy, patients proceed to consolidation therapy. * Consolidation therapy: Patients receive bevacizumab IV on day 1 and oral erlotinib hydrochloride on days 1-21. Treatment repeats every 21 days for up to 6 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. * Phase II: * Induction therapy: Patients receive induction therapy as in phase I (closed to accrual as of 1/3/2008). * Chemoradiotherapy: Patients undergo TCRT and receive carboplatin and paclitaxel as in phase I (closed to accrual as of 1/3/2008). Patients also receive bevacizumab and erlotinib hydrochloride as in phase I (closed to accrual as of 1/3/2008) at the MTD/drug combination determined in phase I (closed to accrual as of 1/3/2008). * Consolidation therapy: Patients receive consolidation therapy as in phase I (closed to accrual as of 1/3/2008). Tumor tissue and peripheral blood is collected at baseline for future correlative and biomarker studies. After completion of study therapy, patients are followed every 2 months for 2 years, every 4 months for 2 years, every 6 months for 2 years, and then annually thereafter.

Interventions

DRUGerlotinib hydrochloride

Given orally

DRUGpaclitaxel

Given IV

BIOLOGICALbevacizumab

Given IV

DRUGcarboplatin

Given IV

RADIATION3-dimensional conformal radiation therapy

Given 5 days a week for 7 weeks

Sponsors

Genentech, Inc.
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Eli Lilly and Company
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 120 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS: * Diagnosis of non-small cell lung cancer * Stage IIIA or IIIB disease * No malignant pleural or pericardial effusions * No palpable supraclavicular adenopathy * Squamous cell histology allowed provided there is no hemoptysis and no central invasive lesions that abut or invade major blood vessels in the chest (with or without cavitation) * Considered suitable and appropriate for combined modality therapy and thoracic conformal radiotherapy, as determined by the treating medical and radiation oncologist PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS: * Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0-1 * Hemoglobin ≥ 9.0 mg/dL * Platelet count ≥ 100,000/mm³ * Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) ≥ 1,500/mm³ * Forced expiratory volume 1 (FEV\_1) ≥ 1 L * Creatinine ≤ 1.5 times upper limit of normal (ULN) * Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) or Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) ≤ 2.5 times ULN * Bilirubin normal * Partial thromboplastin time (PTT) and international normalized ratio (INR) normal * Urine protein:creatinine ratio \< 1.0 * Blood pressure ≤ 150/100 mm Hg on 3 separate occasions * Not pregnant or nursing * Negative pregnancy test * Fertile patients must use effective contraception * No significant recent hemoptysis (\> ½ teaspoon of bright red blood) * No unstable angina * No New York Heart Association (NYHA) congestive heart failure ≥ class II * No myocardial infarction or stroke within the past 6 months * No clinically significant peripheral vascular disease * No evidence of bleeding diathesis or coagulopathy * No abdominal fistula, gastrointestinal perforation, or intra-abdominal abscess within the past 6 months * No serious, non-healing wound, ulcer, or bone fracture * No thrombosis requiring therapeutic anticoagulation * No significant traumatic injury within the last 28 days PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY: * Recovered from prior surgery * At least 4 weeks since prior and no concurrent participation in another experimental drug study * At least 4 weeks since prior and no concurrent major surgical procedure or open biopsy * At least 2 weeks since prior mediastinoscopy or mediastinotomy * At least 1 week since prior fine needle aspirations or core biopsies * No other concurrent antineoplastic or antitumor agents, including chemotherapy, radiotherapy, immunotherapy, or hormonal anticancer therapy * No other concurrent investigational agents

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Maximum Dose of Erlotinib When Given Together With Carboplatin, Paclitaxel, and Thoracic Conformal Radiotherapy (Phase I [Closed to Accrual as of 1/3/2008])6 weeks after completion of therapyDose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were used to establish which cohort would be used for the phase II portion of the trial. DLTs were defined as any grade 3 or 4 nonhematologic toxicity with the exception of esophagitis, which had to be grade 4; grade 4 neutropenia lasting greater than or equal to 7 days and thrombocytopenia to less than 20,000/microliter.
Safety and Toxicity Profile of Combining Both Bevacizumab and Erlotinib Hydrochloride With Carboplatin, Paclitaxel, and Thoracic Conformal Radiotherapy6 weeks after completion of therapyA list of Hematologic and nonhematologic toxicities associated with induction and concurrent therapy. This includes the percentage of patients who experienced grades 2-4 based on the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (version 3.0).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Progression-free Survival (PFS)5 yearsThe length of time during and after the treatment of a stage IIIA/B NSCLC that a patient lives with the disease but it does not get worse. Progression is defined using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0), as a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, or a measurable increase in a non-target lesion, or the appearance of new lesions.
Response Rate to Induction Therapy (Phase I [Closed to Accrual as of 1/3/2008] and II)5 yearsMeasurable lesions must be accurately measured in at least one dimension (longest diameter to be recorded) as \> 20 mm with conventional techniques or as \> 10mm with spiral CT scan or nonmeasurable, but evaluable. Evaluable is nonmeasurable disease that includes ascites, malignant pleural/pericardial effusion, bone lesions, or marrow involvement. The same method of assessment and the same techniques should be used to characterize each identified and reported lesion at baseline and during follow-up. Complete Response (CR)- Disappearance of all target lesions
Overall Response Rate and Survival Profile5 yearsThe overall response rate (ORR) to the two cycles of induction therapy plus bevacizumab in stage IIIA/B NSCLC. ORR is the portion of patients with a tumor size reduction for a minimum time period. Response duration is measured from the time of initial response until documented tumor progression.
Feasibility and Tolerability of Administering Consolidation Therapy6 cyclesThe proportion of patients who were able to complete consolidation therapy after induction therapy and chemoradiotherapy

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Participants were recruited from four institutions between February 2006 and April 2010.

Pre-assignment details

Of the 48 participants screened for eligibility, 46 were deemed eligible and went on to treatment, 1 was ineligible, and 1 was initially ruled eligible but the liver functioning tests (LFTs) continued to increase so the PI felt the participant should not be treated.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Cohort 1
Bevacizumab 10 mg + Chemoradiotherapy (carboplatin, paclitaxel, and 3-dimensional conformal radiation therapy)
5
Cohort 2
Bevacizumab 10 mg + Erlotinib 100 mg + Chemoradiotherapy (carboplatin, paclitaxel, and 3-dimensional conformal radiation therapy)
5
Cohort 3
Bevacizumab + Erlotinib 150 mg + Chemoradiotherapy (carboplatin, paclitaxel, and 3-dimensional conformal radiation therapy)
6
Phase II
Bevacizumab + Erlotinib100 mg + Chemoradiotherapy (carboplatin, paclitaxel, and 3-dimensional conformal radiation therapy)
30
Total46

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003
Overall StudyAdverse Event0123
Overall StudyDeclining Performance Status0001
Overall StudyDid not get consolidation therapy3030
Overall StudyLack of Efficacy0003
Overall StudyPhysician Decision0001
Overall StudyProtocol Violation0001
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject0001

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicCohort 1Cohort 2Cohort 3Phase IITotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
1 Participants2 Participants3 Participants12 Participants18 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
4 Participants3 Participants3 Participants18 Participants28 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
5 Participants5 Participants6 Participants29 Participants45 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants1 Participants2 Participants7 Participants10 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
4 Participants4 Participants4 Participants22 Participants34 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
5 participants5 participants6 participants30 participants46 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
1 Participants2 Participants3 Participants16 Participants22 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
4 Participants3 Participants3 Participants14 Participants24 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
30 / 45
other
Total, other adverse events
45 / 45
serious
Total, serious adverse events
19 / 45

Outcome results

Primary

Maximum Dose of Erlotinib When Given Together With Carboplatin, Paclitaxel, and Thoracic Conformal Radiotherapy (Phase I [Closed to Accrual as of 1/3/2008])

Dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were used to establish which cohort would be used for the phase II portion of the trial. DLTs were defined as any grade 3 or 4 nonhematologic toxicity with the exception of esophagitis, which had to be grade 4; grade 4 neutropenia lasting greater than or equal to 7 days and thrombocytopenia to less than 20,000/microliter.

Time frame: 6 weeks after completion of therapy

Population: This was a phase I objective only, so the phase II participants are not included.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Cohort 1Maximum Dose of Erlotinib When Given Together With Carboplatin, Paclitaxel, and Thoracic Conformal Radiotherapy (Phase I [Closed to Accrual as of 1/3/2008])0 DLTs
Cohort 2Maximum Dose of Erlotinib When Given Together With Carboplatin, Paclitaxel, and Thoracic Conformal Radiotherapy (Phase I [Closed to Accrual as of 1/3/2008])0 DLTs
Cohort 3Maximum Dose of Erlotinib When Given Together With Carboplatin, Paclitaxel, and Thoracic Conformal Radiotherapy (Phase I [Closed to Accrual as of 1/3/2008])2 DLTs
Primary

Safety and Toxicity Profile of Combining Both Bevacizumab and Erlotinib Hydrochloride With Carboplatin, Paclitaxel, and Thoracic Conformal Radiotherapy

A list of Hematologic and nonhematologic toxicities associated with induction and concurrent therapy. This includes the percentage of patients who experienced grades 2-4 based on the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (version 3.0).

Time frame: 6 weeks after completion of therapy

Population: Of the 46 patients, one was retrospectively diagnosed as having stage IV NSCLC after induction therapy was withdrawn from the protocol therapy leaving 45 evaluable for toxicity. 42 patients were eligible for concurrent therapy.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Cohort 1Safety and Toxicity Profile of Combining Both Bevacizumab and Erlotinib Hydrochloride With Carboplatin, Paclitaxel, and Thoracic Conformal RadiotherapyFatigue20 percentage of participants
Cohort 1Safety and Toxicity Profile of Combining Both Bevacizumab and Erlotinib Hydrochloride With Carboplatin, Paclitaxel, and Thoracic Conformal RadiotherapyThrombocytopenia0 percentage of participants
Cohort 1Safety and Toxicity Profile of Combining Both Bevacizumab and Erlotinib Hydrochloride With Carboplatin, Paclitaxel, and Thoracic Conformal RadiotherapyAnemia4 percentage of participants
Cohort 1Safety and Toxicity Profile of Combining Both Bevacizumab and Erlotinib Hydrochloride With Carboplatin, Paclitaxel, and Thoracic Conformal RadiotherapyNeutrophenia52 percentage of participants
Cohort 1Safety and Toxicity Profile of Combining Both Bevacizumab and Erlotinib Hydrochloride With Carboplatin, Paclitaxel, and Thoracic Conformal RadiotherapyFebrile neutropenia0 percentage of participants
Cohort 1Safety and Toxicity Profile of Combining Both Bevacizumab and Erlotinib Hydrochloride With Carboplatin, Paclitaxel, and Thoracic Conformal RadiotherapyNausea/vomiting7 percentage of participants
Cohort 1Safety and Toxicity Profile of Combining Both Bevacizumab and Erlotinib Hydrochloride With Carboplatin, Paclitaxel, and Thoracic Conformal RadiotherapyAlopecia42 percentage of participants
Cohort 1Safety and Toxicity Profile of Combining Both Bevacizumab and Erlotinib Hydrochloride With Carboplatin, Paclitaxel, and Thoracic Conformal RadiotherapyHypertension9 percentage of participants
Cohort 1Safety and Toxicity Profile of Combining Both Bevacizumab and Erlotinib Hydrochloride With Carboplatin, Paclitaxel, and Thoracic Conformal RadiotherapyMyalgias/arthralgias27 percentage of participants
Cohort 1Safety and Toxicity Profile of Combining Both Bevacizumab and Erlotinib Hydrochloride With Carboplatin, Paclitaxel, and Thoracic Conformal RadiotherapyDiarrhea6 percentage of participants
Cohort 1Safety and Toxicity Profile of Combining Both Bevacizumab and Erlotinib Hydrochloride With Carboplatin, Paclitaxel, and Thoracic Conformal RadiotherapyNeuropathy2 percentage of participants
Cohort 1Safety and Toxicity Profile of Combining Both Bevacizumab and Erlotinib Hydrochloride With Carboplatin, Paclitaxel, and Thoracic Conformal RadiotherapyRash2 percentage of participants
Cohort 1Safety and Toxicity Profile of Combining Both Bevacizumab and Erlotinib Hydrochloride With Carboplatin, Paclitaxel, and Thoracic Conformal RadiotherapyAnorexia0 percentage of participants
Cohort 1Safety and Toxicity Profile of Combining Both Bevacizumab and Erlotinib Hydrochloride With Carboplatin, Paclitaxel, and Thoracic Conformal RadiotherapyEsophagitis0 percentage of participants
Cohort 1Safety and Toxicity Profile of Combining Both Bevacizumab and Erlotinib Hydrochloride With Carboplatin, Paclitaxel, and Thoracic Conformal RadiotherapyDehydration0 percentage of participants
Cohort 1Safety and Toxicity Profile of Combining Both Bevacizumab and Erlotinib Hydrochloride With Carboplatin, Paclitaxel, and Thoracic Conformal RadiotherapyHemorrhage0 percentage of participants
Cohort 1Safety and Toxicity Profile of Combining Both Bevacizumab and Erlotinib Hydrochloride With Carboplatin, Paclitaxel, and Thoracic Conformal RadiotherapyHypomagnesemia0 percentage of participants
Cohort 1Safety and Toxicity Profile of Combining Both Bevacizumab and Erlotinib Hydrochloride With Carboplatin, Paclitaxel, and Thoracic Conformal RadiotherapyProteinuria0 percentage of participants
Cohort 1Safety and Toxicity Profile of Combining Both Bevacizumab and Erlotinib Hydrochloride With Carboplatin, Paclitaxel, and Thoracic Conformal RadiotherapyWeight loss0 percentage of participants
Cohort 1Safety and Toxicity Profile of Combining Both Bevacizumab and Erlotinib Hydrochloride With Carboplatin, Paclitaxel, and Thoracic Conformal RadiotherapyPneumonitis0 percentage of participants
Cohort 1Safety and Toxicity Profile of Combining Both Bevacizumab and Erlotinib Hydrochloride With Carboplatin, Paclitaxel, and Thoracic Conformal RadiotherapyHypersensitivity reaction4 percentage of participants
Cohort 2Safety and Toxicity Profile of Combining Both Bevacizumab and Erlotinib Hydrochloride With Carboplatin, Paclitaxel, and Thoracic Conformal RadiotherapyNeuropathy2 percentage of participants
Cohort 2Safety and Toxicity Profile of Combining Both Bevacizumab and Erlotinib Hydrochloride With Carboplatin, Paclitaxel, and Thoracic Conformal RadiotherapyWeight loss9 percentage of participants
Cohort 2Safety and Toxicity Profile of Combining Both Bevacizumab and Erlotinib Hydrochloride With Carboplatin, Paclitaxel, and Thoracic Conformal RadiotherapyThrombocytopenia16 percentage of participants
Cohort 2Safety and Toxicity Profile of Combining Both Bevacizumab and Erlotinib Hydrochloride With Carboplatin, Paclitaxel, and Thoracic Conformal RadiotherapyRash11 percentage of participants
Cohort 2Safety and Toxicity Profile of Combining Both Bevacizumab and Erlotinib Hydrochloride With Carboplatin, Paclitaxel, and Thoracic Conformal RadiotherapyAnemia17 percentage of participants
Cohort 2Safety and Toxicity Profile of Combining Both Bevacizumab and Erlotinib Hydrochloride With Carboplatin, Paclitaxel, and Thoracic Conformal RadiotherapyHypomagnesemia4 percentage of participants
Cohort 2Safety and Toxicity Profile of Combining Both Bevacizumab and Erlotinib Hydrochloride With Carboplatin, Paclitaxel, and Thoracic Conformal RadiotherapyAnorexia6 percentage of participants
Cohort 2Safety and Toxicity Profile of Combining Both Bevacizumab and Erlotinib Hydrochloride With Carboplatin, Paclitaxel, and Thoracic Conformal RadiotherapyFebrile neutropenia2 percentage of participants
Cohort 2Safety and Toxicity Profile of Combining Both Bevacizumab and Erlotinib Hydrochloride With Carboplatin, Paclitaxel, and Thoracic Conformal RadiotherapyHypersensitivity reaction2 percentage of participants
Cohort 2Safety and Toxicity Profile of Combining Both Bevacizumab and Erlotinib Hydrochloride With Carboplatin, Paclitaxel, and Thoracic Conformal RadiotherapyNausea/vomiting6 percentage of participants
Cohort 2Safety and Toxicity Profile of Combining Both Bevacizumab and Erlotinib Hydrochloride With Carboplatin, Paclitaxel, and Thoracic Conformal RadiotherapyNeutrophenia35 percentage of participants
Cohort 2Safety and Toxicity Profile of Combining Both Bevacizumab and Erlotinib Hydrochloride With Carboplatin, Paclitaxel, and Thoracic Conformal RadiotherapyFatigue22 percentage of participants
Cohort 2Safety and Toxicity Profile of Combining Both Bevacizumab and Erlotinib Hydrochloride With Carboplatin, Paclitaxel, and Thoracic Conformal RadiotherapyEsophagitis40 percentage of participants
Cohort 2Safety and Toxicity Profile of Combining Both Bevacizumab and Erlotinib Hydrochloride With Carboplatin, Paclitaxel, and Thoracic Conformal RadiotherapyAlopecia9 percentage of participants
Cohort 2Safety and Toxicity Profile of Combining Both Bevacizumab and Erlotinib Hydrochloride With Carboplatin, Paclitaxel, and Thoracic Conformal RadiotherapyProteinuria2 percentage of participants
Cohort 2Safety and Toxicity Profile of Combining Both Bevacizumab and Erlotinib Hydrochloride With Carboplatin, Paclitaxel, and Thoracic Conformal RadiotherapyHypertension4 percentage of participants
Cohort 2Safety and Toxicity Profile of Combining Both Bevacizumab and Erlotinib Hydrochloride With Carboplatin, Paclitaxel, and Thoracic Conformal RadiotherapyDehydration11 percentage of participants
Cohort 2Safety and Toxicity Profile of Combining Both Bevacizumab and Erlotinib Hydrochloride With Carboplatin, Paclitaxel, and Thoracic Conformal RadiotherapyMyalgias/arthralgias0 percentage of participants
Cohort 2Safety and Toxicity Profile of Combining Both Bevacizumab and Erlotinib Hydrochloride With Carboplatin, Paclitaxel, and Thoracic Conformal RadiotherapyPneumonitis2 percentage of participants
Cohort 2Safety and Toxicity Profile of Combining Both Bevacizumab and Erlotinib Hydrochloride With Carboplatin, Paclitaxel, and Thoracic Conformal RadiotherapyDiarrhea2 percentage of participants
Cohort 2Safety and Toxicity Profile of Combining Both Bevacizumab and Erlotinib Hydrochloride With Carboplatin, Paclitaxel, and Thoracic Conformal RadiotherapyHemorrhage6 percentage of participants
Secondary

Feasibility and Tolerability of Administering Consolidation Therapy

The proportion of patients who were able to complete consolidation therapy after induction therapy and chemoradiotherapy

Time frame: 6 cycles

Population: Of the initial 14 patients, only 9 (64%) patients were able to start consolidation therapy and only 5 (36%) patients were able to complete 6 cycles.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Cohort 1Feasibility and Tolerability of Administering Consolidation Therapy5 Participants
Secondary

Overall Response Rate and Survival Profile

The overall response rate (ORR) to the two cycles of induction therapy plus bevacizumab in stage IIIA/B NSCLC. ORR is the portion of patients with a tumor size reduction for a minimum time period. Response duration is measured from the time of initial response until documented tumor progression.

Time frame: 5 years

Population: Of the 46 patients, one was retrospectively diagnosed as having stage IV NSCLC after induction therapy was withdrawn from the protocol therapy leaving 45 evaluable patients.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Cohort 1Overall Response Rate and Survival Profile39 percentage of participants
Secondary

Progression-free Survival (PFS)

The length of time during and after the treatment of a stage IIIA/B NSCLC that a patient lives with the disease but it does not get worse. Progression is defined using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0), as a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, or a measurable increase in a non-target lesion, or the appearance of new lesions.

Time frame: 5 years

Population: Of the 46 patients, one was retrospectively diagnosed as having stage IV NSCLC after induction therapy was withdrawn from the protocol therapy leaving 45 evaluable patients.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Cohort 1Progression-free Survival (PFS)10.2 Months
Secondary

Response Rate to Induction Therapy (Phase I [Closed to Accrual as of 1/3/2008] and II)

Measurable lesions must be accurately measured in at least one dimension (longest diameter to be recorded) as \> 20 mm with conventional techniques or as \> 10mm with spiral CT scan or nonmeasurable, but evaluable. Evaluable is nonmeasurable disease that includes ascites, malignant pleural/pericardial effusion, bone lesions, or marrow involvement. The same method of assessment and the same techniques should be used to characterize each identified and reported lesion at baseline and during follow-up. Complete Response (CR)- Disappearance of all target lesions

Time frame: 5 years

Population: 43 of 45 patients received both cycles of induction C/P therapy plus bevacizumab.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Cohort 1Response Rate to Induction Therapy (Phase I [Closed to Accrual as of 1/3/2008] and II)0 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026