Skip to content

Short Term Relief of Eustachian Tube Dysfunction and Serous Otitis Media Using Intranasal Steroid Sprays

Short Term Relief of Eustachian Tube Dysfunction and Serous Otitis Media Using Intranasal Steroid Sprays: a Randomized Placebo-controlled Study

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00279916
Enrollment
91
Registered
2006-01-20
Start date
2005-09-01
Completion date
2009-03-31
Last updated
2017-05-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Negative Middle Ear Pressure, Otitis Media, Secretory, Otitis Media, Serous, Otitis Media With Effusion, Rhinitis

Brief summary

We hypothesize that intranasal steroid application will have a beneficial therapeutic effect in adults with regard to resolution of serous otitis media and/or negative middle ear pressure, as compared to placebo. We further hypothesize that the rate of spontaneous short-term resolution of otitis media wit effusion in adults treated with placebo will be relatively low (minority of patients).

Detailed description

Newer intranasal steroid preparations are generally safe with relatively few side effects as demonstrated in large studies dealing with allergic rhinitis. Eustachian Tube Dysfunction (ETD) primarily refers to an absent or inadequate ability to open the eustachian tube. The term Serous Otitis Media (SOM) generally referring to an accumulation of fluid within the middle ear space, in absence of signs indicating acute infection. Commonly, this can result in a conductive hearing loss due to restriction of tympanic membrane mobility. Negative Middle Ear Pressure (NMEP) is often a precursor to the development of SOM, and has it's own effect on the acoustic properties of the middle ear, also resulting in conductive hearing loss. Due to the lack of a single accepted medical intervention to deal with ETD and the general benign nature of this condition, it is common practice for some physicians to take a wait and see initial approach when this clinical entity is encountered in lieu of prescribing unproved medications. It is generally accepted that some patients with Negative Middle Ear Pressure (NMEP) and/or Serous Otitis Media (SOM) will undergo spontaneous resolution of symptoms, yet the exact resolution rates are not clearly defined. The purpose of this double-blind, randomized study of either triamcinolone acetonide nasal spray or a sham placebo nasal spray for 6 weeks is to determine if there is improvement in a test of middle ear pressure. Neither the subjects nor the Investigator will know which of the two treatments is being used until the end of the study. Resolution of ETD symptoms will be measured by changes in the tympanogram, a test to measure pressure within the middle ear. This measurement will be taken at baseline and after 6 weeks of treatment.

Interventions

DRUGTriamcinolone acetonide nasal spray

Subjects aged 12 years or older received 2 metered sprays in each nostril once daily (55 micrograms/spray) (total daily dose 220 micrograms). Subjects younger than 12 years old received received 1 metered spray in each nostril once daily (55 micrograms/spray) (total daily dose 110 micrograms).

DRUGPlacebo nasal spray

Subjects aged 12 years or older received an aqueous solution lacking triamcinolone, 2 metered sprays in each nostril once daily. Subjects younger than 12 years old received received 1 metered spray of placebo solution in each nostril once daily.

Sponsors

Aventis Pharmaceuticals
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Mayo Clinic
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
6 Years to 100 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Male or female, age 0-18 years * Patients with serous otitis media and/or negative middle ear pressure as documented by otoscopic examination and tympanometry will be considered for enrollment * Pregnant

Exclusion criteria

* Unwilling to discontinue breast feeding, when applicable * Active upper respiratory infection * Nasopharyngeal mass * Chronic infectious otitis media * Cholesteatoma * Acute infectious otitis media * History of otologic surgery other than placement of a pressure equalizer tube in the affected ear * History of radiation therapy to the head and neck region * Neuromuscular disease * Cystic fibrosis * Immunodeficiency * Mucociliary disorders * Craniofacial disorders/syndromes * Cleft palate * Development delay and/or symptoms suggestive of perilymph fistula

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Subjects With Complete Normalization of Abnormal Tympanometry, Regardless of Additional Treatment6 weeksNumber of subjects with resolution of eustachian tube dysfunction symptoms, as determined by the change in tympanogram type in both ears from an initial Type B or C result to Type A result at 6 weeks. Type A; peaked pressure measurement under -100 kilo Pascals (kPa). Type B; non-peaked, or flat tympanogram, Type C; peaked pressure measurements more negative than -100 kPa. A Pascal is a unit used to quantify internal pressure.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Per-Ear Treatment Outcomebaseline, 6 weeksInitial Tympanogram Type at baseline was compared to Follow-Up Tympanogram Type at 6 weeks. Type A is considered to be normal. Type A; peaked pressure measurement under -100 kilo Pascals (kPa). Type B; non-peaked, or flat tympanogram, Type C; peaked pressure measurements more negative than -100 kPa. A Pascal is a unit used to quantify internal pressure.
Number of Subjects With Change in Symptom Frequency and Severity - Fullness or Pressure in Earsbaseline, 6 weeksAs measured by the Eustachian Tube Dysfunction Questionnaire. The questionnaire had 5 symptoms with a Frequency Rating from 1=Never to 5=Constantly, and Severity rating from 1=None at all to 5=Maximum severity. The change in frequency and severity ratings were categorized as same, better, or worse.
Number of Subjects With Change in Symptom Frequency and Severity - Pain in Earsbaseline, 6 weeksAs measured by the Eustachian Tube Dysfunction Questionnaire. The questionnaire had 5 symptoms with a Frequency Rating from 1=Never to 5=Constantly, and Severity rating from 1=None at all to 5=Maximum severity. The change in frequency and severity ratings were categorized as same, better, or worse.
Complete Normalization of Abnormal Tympanometry Considering the Subjects Who Took Additional Treatment as Having Incomplete Resolution6 weeksFor this outcome measure, the subjects treated with antibiotics or oral decongestants while enrolled in the study were handled as having treatment failures. For this outcome measure, subjects with complete normalization of abnormal tympanometry at 6 weeks had a Type A tympanogram and did not take antibiotics, oral decongestants, nasal spray or a combination.
Number of Subjects With Change in Symptom Frequency and Severity - Popping Sensation in Earsbaseline, 6 weeksAs measured by the Eustachian Tube Dysfunction Questionnaire. The questionnaire had 5 symptoms with a Frequency Rating from 1=Never to 5=Constantly, and Severity rating from 1=None at all to 5=Maximum severity. The change in frequency and severity ratings were categorized as same, better, or worse.
Number of Subjects With Change in Symptom Frequency and Severity - Dampened Hearing/Loss Worse Than Usualbaseline, 6 weeksAs measured by the Eustachian Tube Dysfunction Questionnaire. The questionnaire had 5 symptoms with a Frequency Rating from 1=Never to 5=Constantly, and Severity rating from 1=None at all to 5=Maximum severity. The change in frequency and severity ratings were categorized as same, better, or worse.
Number of Subjects With Change in Symptom Frequency and Severity - Plugged Sensation in Earsbaseline, 6 weeksAs measured by the Eustachian Tube Dysfunction Questionnaire. The questionnaire had 5 symptoms with a Frequency Rating from 1=Never to 5=Constantly, and Severity rating from 1=None at all to 5=Maximum severity. The change in frequency and severity ratings were categorized as same, better, or worse.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Study participants were recruited from the patients seen at the Mayo Clinic Department of Otorhinolaryngology (Ears, Nose and Throat) in Rochester, Minnesota. Enrollment occurred from 09/01/2005 through 12/31/2008.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Triamcinolone Acetonide
Triamcinolone acetonide nasal spray; Subjects aged 12 years or older received 2 metered sprays in each nostril once daily (55 micrograms/spray) (total daily dose 220 micrograms) for 6 weeks duration. Subjects younger than 12 years old received 1 metered spray in each nostril once daily (55 micrograms/spray) (total daily dose 110 micrograms) for 6 weeks duration.
45
Placebo
Placebo nasal spray; Subjects aged 12 years or older received an aqueous solution lacking triamcinolone, 2 metered sprays in each nostril once daily for 6 weeks duration. Subjects younger than 12 years old received 1 metered spray of placebo solution in each nostril once daily for 6 weeks duration.
46
Total91

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up32
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject43

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPlaceboTriamcinolone AcetonideTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
18 Participants16 Participants34 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
16 Participants11 Participants27 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
12 Participants18 Participants30 Participants
Age, Continuous42.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 30.8
41.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 28.4
41.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 29.5
Sex: Female, Male
Female
16 Participants30 Participants46 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
30 Participants15 Participants45 Participants
Tympanogram type in worst ear
A; peak pressure under -100 kPa
0 participants0 participants0 participants
Tympanogram type in worst ear
B; non-peaked or flat pressure
16 participants17 participants33 participants
Tympanogram type in worst ear
C; peaked pressure greater than -100 kPa
30 participants28 participants58 participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 450 / 41
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 450 / 41

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Subjects With Complete Normalization of Abnormal Tympanometry, Regardless of Additional Treatment

Number of subjects with resolution of eustachian tube dysfunction symptoms, as determined by the change in tympanogram type in both ears from an initial Type B or C result to Type A result at 6 weeks. Type A; peaked pressure measurement under -100 kilo Pascals (kPa). Type B; non-peaked, or flat tympanogram, Type C; peaked pressure measurements more negative than -100 kPa. A Pascal is a unit used to quantify internal pressure.

Time frame: 6 weeks

Population: Number of participants is based on those who completed the study and who had a follow-up tympanogram. 37 of the subjects randomized to Triamcinolone acetonide nasal spray and 37 of the subjects randomized to placebo had a follow-up tympanogram at 6 weeks.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Triamcinolone AcetonideNumber of Subjects With Complete Normalization of Abnormal Tympanometry, Regardless of Additional Treatment7 participants
PlaceboNumber of Subjects With Complete Normalization of Abnormal Tympanometry, Regardless of Additional Treatment12 participants
p-value: 0.18Chi-squared
Secondary

Complete Normalization of Abnormal Tympanometry Considering the Subjects Who Took Additional Treatment as Having Incomplete Resolution

For this outcome measure, the subjects treated with antibiotics or oral decongestants while enrolled in the study were handled as having treatment failures. For this outcome measure, subjects with complete normalization of abnormal tympanometry at 6 weeks had a Type A tympanogram and did not take antibiotics, oral decongestants, nasal spray or a combination.

Time frame: 6 weeks

Population: Number of participants is based on those who completed the study and who had a follow-up tympanogram. 37 of the subjects randomized to Triamcinolone acetonide nasal spray and 37 of the subjects randomized to placebo had a follow-up tympanogram at 6 weeks.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Triamcinolone AcetonideComplete Normalization of Abnormal Tympanometry Considering the Subjects Who Took Additional Treatment as Having Incomplete Resolution5 participants
PlaceboComplete Normalization of Abnormal Tympanometry Considering the Subjects Who Took Additional Treatment as Having Incomplete Resolution9 participants
p-value: 0.24Chi-squared
Secondary

Number of Subjects With Change in Symptom Frequency and Severity - Dampened Hearing/Loss Worse Than Usual

As measured by the Eustachian Tube Dysfunction Questionnaire. The questionnaire had 5 symptoms with a Frequency Rating from 1=Never to 5=Constantly, and Severity rating from 1=None at all to 5=Maximum severity. The change in frequency and severity ratings were categorized as same, better, or worse.

Time frame: baseline, 6 weeks

Population: Number of participants is based on those who completed the study and who completed a baseline and a follow-up questionnaire. 38 of the subjects randomized to Triamcinolone acetonide nasal spray and 40 of the subjects randomized to placebo had a baseline and follow-up questionnaire at 6 weeks.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Triamcinolone AcetonideNumber of Subjects With Change in Symptom Frequency and Severity - Dampened Hearing/Loss Worse Than UsualFrequency - Missing0 participants
Triamcinolone AcetonideNumber of Subjects With Change in Symptom Frequency and Severity - Dampened Hearing/Loss Worse Than UsualFrequency - Better16 participants
Triamcinolone AcetonideNumber of Subjects With Change in Symptom Frequency and Severity - Dampened Hearing/Loss Worse Than UsualFrequency - Same14 participants
Triamcinolone AcetonideNumber of Subjects With Change in Symptom Frequency and Severity - Dampened Hearing/Loss Worse Than UsualFrequency - Worse8 participants
Triamcinolone AcetonideNumber of Subjects With Change in Symptom Frequency and Severity - Dampened Hearing/Loss Worse Than UsualSeverity - Missing0 participants
Triamcinolone AcetonideNumber of Subjects With Change in Symptom Frequency and Severity - Dampened Hearing/Loss Worse Than UsualSeverity - Better15 participants
Triamcinolone AcetonideNumber of Subjects With Change in Symptom Frequency and Severity - Dampened Hearing/Loss Worse Than UsualSeverity - Same13 participants
Triamcinolone AcetonideNumber of Subjects With Change in Symptom Frequency and Severity - Dampened Hearing/Loss Worse Than UsualSeverity - Worse10 participants
PlaceboNumber of Subjects With Change in Symptom Frequency and Severity - Dampened Hearing/Loss Worse Than UsualSeverity - Worse10 participants
PlaceboNumber of Subjects With Change in Symptom Frequency and Severity - Dampened Hearing/Loss Worse Than UsualFrequency - Missing1 participants
PlaceboNumber of Subjects With Change in Symptom Frequency and Severity - Dampened Hearing/Loss Worse Than UsualSeverity - Missing1 participants
PlaceboNumber of Subjects With Change in Symptom Frequency and Severity - Dampened Hearing/Loss Worse Than UsualFrequency - Better16 participants
PlaceboNumber of Subjects With Change in Symptom Frequency and Severity - Dampened Hearing/Loss Worse Than UsualSeverity - Same15 participants
PlaceboNumber of Subjects With Change in Symptom Frequency and Severity - Dampened Hearing/Loss Worse Than UsualFrequency - Same15 participants
PlaceboNumber of Subjects With Change in Symptom Frequency and Severity - Dampened Hearing/Loss Worse Than UsualSeverity - Better14 participants
PlaceboNumber of Subjects With Change in Symptom Frequency and Severity - Dampened Hearing/Loss Worse Than UsualFrequency - Worse8 participants
Secondary

Number of Subjects With Change in Symptom Frequency and Severity - Fullness or Pressure in Ears

As measured by the Eustachian Tube Dysfunction Questionnaire. The questionnaire had 5 symptoms with a Frequency Rating from 1=Never to 5=Constantly, and Severity rating from 1=None at all to 5=Maximum severity. The change in frequency and severity ratings were categorized as same, better, or worse.

Time frame: baseline, 6 weeks

Population: Number of participants is based on those who completed the study and who completed a baseline and a follow-up questionnaire. 38 of the subjects randomized to Triamcinolone acetonide nasal spray and 40 of the subjects randomized to placebo had a baseline and follow-up questionnaire at 6 weeks.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Triamcinolone AcetonideNumber of Subjects With Change in Symptom Frequency and Severity - Fullness or Pressure in EarsFrequency - Better11 participants
Triamcinolone AcetonideNumber of Subjects With Change in Symptom Frequency and Severity - Fullness or Pressure in EarsFrequency - Same17 participants
Triamcinolone AcetonideNumber of Subjects With Change in Symptom Frequency and Severity - Fullness or Pressure in EarsFrequency - Worse10 participants
Triamcinolone AcetonideNumber of Subjects With Change in Symptom Frequency and Severity - Fullness or Pressure in EarsSeverity - Same14 participants
Triamcinolone AcetonideNumber of Subjects With Change in Symptom Frequency and Severity - Fullness or Pressure in EarsSeverity - Worse11 participants
Triamcinolone AcetonideNumber of Subjects With Change in Symptom Frequency and Severity - Fullness or Pressure in EarsSeverity - Better13 participants
PlaceboNumber of Subjects With Change in Symptom Frequency and Severity - Fullness or Pressure in EarsSeverity - Better18 participants
PlaceboNumber of Subjects With Change in Symptom Frequency and Severity - Fullness or Pressure in EarsFrequency - Better18 participants
PlaceboNumber of Subjects With Change in Symptom Frequency and Severity - Fullness or Pressure in EarsSeverity - Worse9 participants
PlaceboNumber of Subjects With Change in Symptom Frequency and Severity - Fullness or Pressure in EarsFrequency - Same17 participants
PlaceboNumber of Subjects With Change in Symptom Frequency and Severity - Fullness or Pressure in EarsSeverity - Same13 participants
PlaceboNumber of Subjects With Change in Symptom Frequency and Severity - Fullness or Pressure in EarsFrequency - Worse5 participants
Secondary

Number of Subjects With Change in Symptom Frequency and Severity - Pain in Ears

As measured by the Eustachian Tube Dysfunction Questionnaire. The questionnaire had 5 symptoms with a Frequency Rating from 1=Never to 5=Constantly, and Severity rating from 1=None at all to 5=Maximum severity. The change in frequency and severity ratings were categorized as same, better, or worse.

Time frame: baseline, 6 weeks

Population: Number of participants is based on those who completed the study and who completed a baseline and a follow-up questionnaire. 38 of the subjects randomized to Triamcinolone acetonide nasal spray and 40 of the subjects randomized to placebo had a baseline and follow-up questionnaire at 6 weeks.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Triamcinolone AcetonideNumber of Subjects With Change in Symptom Frequency and Severity - Pain in EarsFrequency - Better11 participants
Triamcinolone AcetonideNumber of Subjects With Change in Symptom Frequency and Severity - Pain in EarsFrequency - Same17 participants
Triamcinolone AcetonideNumber of Subjects With Change in Symptom Frequency and Severity - Pain in EarsFrequency - Worse10 participants
Triamcinolone AcetonideNumber of Subjects With Change in Symptom Frequency and Severity - Pain in EarsSeverity - Better9 participants
Triamcinolone AcetonideNumber of Subjects With Change in Symptom Frequency and Severity - Pain in EarsSeverity - Same19 participants
Triamcinolone AcetonideNumber of Subjects With Change in Symptom Frequency and Severity - Pain in EarsSeverity - Worse10 participants
PlaceboNumber of Subjects With Change in Symptom Frequency and Severity - Pain in EarsSeverity - Same25 participants
PlaceboNumber of Subjects With Change in Symptom Frequency and Severity - Pain in EarsFrequency - Better8 participants
PlaceboNumber of Subjects With Change in Symptom Frequency and Severity - Pain in EarsSeverity - Better6 participants
PlaceboNumber of Subjects With Change in Symptom Frequency and Severity - Pain in EarsFrequency - Same23 participants
PlaceboNumber of Subjects With Change in Symptom Frequency and Severity - Pain in EarsSeverity - Worse9 participants
PlaceboNumber of Subjects With Change in Symptom Frequency and Severity - Pain in EarsFrequency - Worse9 participants
Secondary

Number of Subjects With Change in Symptom Frequency and Severity - Plugged Sensation in Ears

As measured by the Eustachian Tube Dysfunction Questionnaire. The questionnaire had 5 symptoms with a Frequency Rating from 1=Never to 5=Constantly, and Severity rating from 1=None at all to 5=Maximum severity. The change in frequency and severity ratings were categorized as same, better, or worse.

Time frame: baseline, 6 weeks

Population: Number of participants is based on those who completed the study and who completed a baseline and a follow-up questionnaire. 38 of the subjects randomized to Triamcinolone acetonide nasal spray and 40 of the subjects randomized to placebo had a baseline and follow-up questionnaire at 6 weeks.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Triamcinolone AcetonideNumber of Subjects With Change in Symptom Frequency and Severity - Plugged Sensation in EarsFrequency - Missing0 participants
Triamcinolone AcetonideNumber of Subjects With Change in Symptom Frequency and Severity - Plugged Sensation in EarsFrequency - Better10 participants
Triamcinolone AcetonideNumber of Subjects With Change in Symptom Frequency and Severity - Plugged Sensation in EarsFrequency - Same13 participants
Triamcinolone AcetonideNumber of Subjects With Change in Symptom Frequency and Severity - Plugged Sensation in EarsFrequency - Worse15 participants
Triamcinolone AcetonideNumber of Subjects With Change in Symptom Frequency and Severity - Plugged Sensation in EarsSeverity - Missing0 participants
Triamcinolone AcetonideNumber of Subjects With Change in Symptom Frequency and Severity - Plugged Sensation in EarsSeverity - Better15 participants
Triamcinolone AcetonideNumber of Subjects With Change in Symptom Frequency and Severity - Plugged Sensation in EarsSeverity - Same8 participants
Triamcinolone AcetonideNumber of Subjects With Change in Symptom Frequency and Severity - Plugged Sensation in EarsSeverity - Worse15 participants
PlaceboNumber of Subjects With Change in Symptom Frequency and Severity - Plugged Sensation in EarsSeverity - Worse9 participants
PlaceboNumber of Subjects With Change in Symptom Frequency and Severity - Plugged Sensation in EarsFrequency - Missing1 participants
PlaceboNumber of Subjects With Change in Symptom Frequency and Severity - Plugged Sensation in EarsSeverity - Missing1 participants
PlaceboNumber of Subjects With Change in Symptom Frequency and Severity - Plugged Sensation in EarsFrequency - Better14 participants
PlaceboNumber of Subjects With Change in Symptom Frequency and Severity - Plugged Sensation in EarsSeverity - Same16 participants
PlaceboNumber of Subjects With Change in Symptom Frequency and Severity - Plugged Sensation in EarsFrequency - Same21 participants
PlaceboNumber of Subjects With Change in Symptom Frequency and Severity - Plugged Sensation in EarsSeverity - Better14 participants
PlaceboNumber of Subjects With Change in Symptom Frequency and Severity - Plugged Sensation in EarsFrequency - Worse4 participants
Secondary

Number of Subjects With Change in Symptom Frequency and Severity - Popping Sensation in Ears

As measured by the Eustachian Tube Dysfunction Questionnaire. The questionnaire had 5 symptoms with a Frequency Rating from 1=Never to 5=Constantly, and Severity rating from 1=None at all to 5=Maximum severity. The change in frequency and severity ratings were categorized as same, better, or worse.

Time frame: baseline, 6 weeks

Population: Number of participants is based on those who completed the study and who completed a baseline and a follow-up questionnaire. 38 of the subjects randomized to Triamcinolone acetonide nasal spray and 40 of the subjects randomized to placebo had a baseline and follow-up questionnaire at 6 weeks.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Triamcinolone AcetonideNumber of Subjects With Change in Symptom Frequency and Severity - Popping Sensation in EarsSeverity - Better9 participants
Triamcinolone AcetonideNumber of Subjects With Change in Symptom Frequency and Severity - Popping Sensation in EarsSeverity - Missing0 participants
Triamcinolone AcetonideNumber of Subjects With Change in Symptom Frequency and Severity - Popping Sensation in EarsFrequency - Same14 participants
Triamcinolone AcetonideNumber of Subjects With Change in Symptom Frequency and Severity - Popping Sensation in EarsFrequency - Better11 participants
Triamcinolone AcetonideNumber of Subjects With Change in Symptom Frequency and Severity - Popping Sensation in EarsSeverity - Same17 participants
Triamcinolone AcetonideNumber of Subjects With Change in Symptom Frequency and Severity - Popping Sensation in EarsFrequency - Worse13 participants
Triamcinolone AcetonideNumber of Subjects With Change in Symptom Frequency and Severity - Popping Sensation in EarsSeverity - Worse12 participants
Triamcinolone AcetonideNumber of Subjects With Change in Symptom Frequency and Severity - Popping Sensation in EarsFrequency - Missing0 participants
PlaceboNumber of Subjects With Change in Symptom Frequency and Severity - Popping Sensation in EarsSeverity - Worse13 participants
PlaceboNumber of Subjects With Change in Symptom Frequency and Severity - Popping Sensation in EarsFrequency - Missing1 participants
PlaceboNumber of Subjects With Change in Symptom Frequency and Severity - Popping Sensation in EarsFrequency - Better8 participants
PlaceboNumber of Subjects With Change in Symptom Frequency and Severity - Popping Sensation in EarsFrequency - Same18 participants
PlaceboNumber of Subjects With Change in Symptom Frequency and Severity - Popping Sensation in EarsFrequency - Worse13 participants
PlaceboNumber of Subjects With Change in Symptom Frequency and Severity - Popping Sensation in EarsSeverity - Missing2 participants
PlaceboNumber of Subjects With Change in Symptom Frequency and Severity - Popping Sensation in EarsSeverity - Better6 participants
PlaceboNumber of Subjects With Change in Symptom Frequency and Severity - Popping Sensation in EarsSeverity - Same19 participants
Secondary

Per-Ear Treatment Outcome

Initial Tympanogram Type at baseline was compared to Follow-Up Tympanogram Type at 6 weeks. Type A is considered to be normal. Type A; peaked pressure measurement under -100 kilo Pascals (kPa). Type B; non-peaked, or flat tympanogram, Type C; peaked pressure measurements more negative than -100 kPa. A Pascal is a unit used to quantify internal pressure.

Time frame: baseline, 6 weeks

Population: Number of participants is based on those who completed the study and who had a follow-up tympanogram. 37 of the subjects randomized to Triamcinolone acetonide nasal spray and 37 of the subjects randomized to placebo had a follow-up tympanogram at 6 weeks.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Triamcinolone AcetonidePer-Ear Treatment OutcomeInitial Tympanogram of Type B or C55 ears
Triamcinolone AcetonidePer-Ear Treatment Outcome6 weeks Complete Normalization (Type A)12 ears
PlaceboPer-Ear Treatment OutcomeInitial Tympanogram of Type B or C57 ears
PlaceboPer-Ear Treatment Outcome6 weeks Complete Normalization (Type A)20 ears

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 29, 2026