Skip to content

OMNI Study--Assessing Therapies in Medtronic Pacemaker, Defibrillator, and Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Devices.

OMNI Study--Assessing Therapies in Medtronic Pacemaker, Defibrillator, and Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Devices.

Status
Terminated
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00277524
Acronym
OMNI
Enrollment
3032
Registered
2006-01-16
Start date
2005-08-31
Completion date
2010-11-30
Last updated
2013-08-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Bradycardia, Heart Failure, Congestive, Tachycardia, Ventricular, Ventricular Dysfunction, Ventricular Fibrillation

Keywords

Pacemaker, Defibrillator, Cardiac Resynchronization, Dysynchrony, Heart failure, Arrhythmia, Tachycardia, Bradycardia

Brief summary

The purpose of the OMNI study is to characterize therapy and diagnostic utilization in study participants implanted with study devices and to describe Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator(ICD)therapy utilization for life threatening arrhythmias in primary and secondary prevention study participants. This study will assess therapies in Medtronic pacemaker, defibrillator, and cardiac resynchronization therapy devices. The first therapy is for reducing unnecessary pacing in pacemaker patients. The second therapy provides pacing therapy in an attempt to stop fast or life threatening ventricular arrhythmias in lieu of delivering a defibrillation shock. The third therapy is a diagnostic measurement of a patient's fluid status and provides the physician information on the patient's heart failure status. The study will also assess the time to a patient's first defibrillation shock and will verify that the shock was for a fast or life threatening ventricular rhythm.

Detailed description

The OMNI results demonstrate the importance of Medtronic's ongoing efforts to increase adoption of evidence based shock-reduction programming strategies. Longer VF NID (number of intervals to detect in the VF zone) should be utilized with the Anti-tachycardia Pacing (ATP) During Charging Feature. ATP during Charging allows physicians to treat with ATP without delay to shock. Therefore, VF NID may be extended to allow episodes the chance to self-terminate immediately to shock by use of the ATP during the charging feature.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Medtronic
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Medtronic Cardiac Rhythm and Heart Failure
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Implant of new or replacement study device. Enrollment must occur no later than 40 days post-implant. * Study participants must be 18 years of age or older.

Exclusion criteria

* Study participants enrolled or intend to participate in another clinical device trial during the course of this study that required specific treatment or programming. * Study participants unwilling and unable to comply with follow-up schedule.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Implanted Systems FrequenciesBaselineFrequencies of implanted systems were measured among patients who were implanted with a device (IPT, ICD or CRT-D).
Implantable Pulse Generator (IPG) Device Baseline Programming Frequencies.BaselinePacing mode is based on the NASPE/BPEG Generic (NBG) Pacemake coding which includes: I, the chambers paced (V= Ventricle, A=Atrium, D=Dual (A&V), O=None); II, the chambers sensed (V= Ventricle, A=Atrium, D=Dual (A&V), O=None); III, the mode of response (T=Triggered, I=Inhibited, D=Dual Triggered/Inhibited, O=None); IV, the programmable functions(R=Rate Modulated, C=Communicating, M=Multiprogrammable, P=Simple Programmable, O=None); V, the antitachycardia functions (O=None, P=Paced, S=Shocks, D=Dual (P&S)). In addition, MVP (managed ventricular pacing) is a mode that promotes AV conduction by reducing or eliminating unnecessary RV pacing but maintains dual chamber ventricular support in the event that AV conduction is lost.
ICD/CRT-D Device Baseline Programming FrequenciesBaselineICD/CRT-D baseline programming, pacing mode and detection. Pacing mode is based on the NASPE/BPEG Generic (NBG) Pacemake coding which includes: I, the chambers paced (V= Ventricle, A=Atrium, D=Dual (A&V), O=None); II, the chambers sensed (V= Ventricle, A=Atrium, D=Dual (A&V), O=None); III, the mode of response (T=Triggered, I=Inhibited, D=Dual Triggered/Inhibited, O=None); IV, the programmable functions(R=Rate Modulated, C=Communicating, M=Multiprogrammable, P=Simple Programmable, O=None); V, the antitachycardia functions (O=None, P=Paced, S=Shocks, D=Dual (P&S)). In addition, MVP (managed ventricular pacing) is a mode that promotes AV conduction by reducing or eliminating unnecessary RV pacing but maintains dual chamber ventricular support in the event that AV conduction is lost.
ICD/CRT-D Device Baseline Programming MeasurementsBaselineICD/CRT-D baseline programming measurements, detection interval. Implanted Cardioverter/Defibrillator paces a patient's heart in a tachyarrhythmia prevention-pacing mode. Detection intervals are used to detect atrial tachyarrhythmia. Detection Intervals are programmable heart rate thresholds. R-R intervals that are less than the VT or VF detection intervals (in ms) are considered evidence of VT or VF, respectively. R-R intervals that are between the FVT and the VF detection intervals are considered evidence of FVT. Thus, these detection interval thresholds demarcate rate zones of detection. The rate zones are used to determine the type of therapy applied once detection occurs.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
AV Block Status by Device Type at 6 and 12 Months.12 months post enrollmentFrequencies of subject with AV block over time between ICD and Implantable Pulse Generator(IPG) study participants.
Frequencies of Subjects With OptiVol Trends and Disease Progression.4 years post implantEstimate the correlation between OptiVol trends and disease progression. A subject's disease status was said to have progressed if: 1. The NYHA classification number increases (example: I to II), or 2. The LVEF decreases by at least 20% (relative difference) and by at least a 5% absolute difference, or 3. The subject expires A subject who crossed OptiVol threshold since last visit was regarded as 'crossed threshold'.
AV Block Status by Severity of Historical AV Block4 years post implantFrequencies of Subjects with AV Block Over Time by Severity of Historical AV Block
Summary of ATP Episodes Within All Treated Episodes4 years post enrollmentEvaluate the utility of the Antitachycardia Pacing (ATP) During Charging feature of the device.
Compare First Shock Rate Between Medtronic PainFREE Programming and SCD-HeFT Programming in Primary Prevention Study Participants.4 years post implantFirst shock rate for VF and FVT zones was estimated using Kaplan-Meier method. OMNI PainFREE definition: programming combinations that result in ATP therapy for ventricular tachycardia (VT) at cycle lengths \<320 ms. Programming at cycle lengths ≥320 ms were not mandated. OMNI SCD-HeFT definition: programming combinations that result in shock therapy only for arrhythmias at cycle lengths of \<320 ms or faster and no therapy for arrhythmias at cycle lengths ≥320 ms.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

The study included 147 outpatient cardiology practices in the United States. Inclusion criteria were(1) implant of an implantable pulse generator (IPG), implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) or cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator (CRT-D); and (2) age 18 years or older. Enrollment period was from Aug 2005 to Jun 2006.

Pre-assignment details

This is a post-market prospective study. No group assignment is given. Subjects implanted with IPGs were enrolled and followed at 6 and 12 months. Subjects implanted with ICDs or CRT-Ds were enrolled and followed at six, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 months.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Overall
All patients enrolled in OMNI.
2,883
Total2,883

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicOverall
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
1895 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
988 Participants
Age Continuous68.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.5
Heart failure (HF) stage
A
44 participants
Heart failure (HF) stage
B
229 participants
Heart failure (HF) stage
C
713 participants
Heart failure (HF) stage
D
44 participants
Heart failure (HF) stage
NA
1275 participants
Heart failure (HF) stage
No HF
578 participants
LVEF(%)33.4 participants
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.7
New York Heart Association (NYHA) classification
I
104 participants
New York Heart Association (NYHA) classification
II
627 participants
New York Heart Association (NYHA) classification
III
857 participants
New York Heart Association (NYHA) classification
IV
72 participants
New York Heart Association (NYHA) classification
Missing
5 participants
New York Heart Association (NYHA) classification
No Heart Failure
600 participants
Number of patients implanted2882 participants
PR interval182.6 ms
STANDARD_DEVIATION 45.5
QRS duration119.9 ms
STANDARD_DEVIATION 34
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
American Indian
7 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
38 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black
335 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Hispanic
206 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Native Hawaiian
8 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
6 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
2217 participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
2883 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
907 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
1976 Participants
Weight188 lbs
STANDARD_DEVIATION 45.3

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 0
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 0

Outcome results

Primary

ICD/CRT-D Device Baseline Programming Frequencies

ICD/CRT-D baseline programming, pacing mode and detection. Pacing mode is based on the NASPE/BPEG Generic (NBG) Pacemake coding which includes: I, the chambers paced (V= Ventricle, A=Atrium, D=Dual (A&V), O=None); II, the chambers sensed (V= Ventricle, A=Atrium, D=Dual (A&V), O=None); III, the mode of response (T=Triggered, I=Inhibited, D=Dual Triggered/Inhibited, O=None); IV, the programmable functions(R=Rate Modulated, C=Communicating, M=Multiprogrammable, P=Simple Programmable, O=None); V, the antitachycardia functions (O=None, P=Paced, S=Shocks, D=Dual (P&S)). In addition, MVP (managed ventricular pacing) is a mode that promotes AV conduction by reducing or eliminating unnecessary RV pacing but maintains dual chamber ventricular support in the event that AV conduction is lost.

Time frame: Baseline

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Implanted SubjectsICD/CRT-D Device Baseline Programming FrequenciesPacing Mode, DDD/DDDR804 participants
Implanted SubjectsICD/CRT-D Device Baseline Programming FrequenciesPacing Mode, DDI/DDIR21 participants
Implanted SubjectsICD/CRT-D Device Baseline Programming FrequenciesPacing Mode, MVP_AAIR_DD525 participants
Implanted SubjectsICD/CRT-D Device Baseline Programming FrequenciesPacing Mode, MVP_AAI_DDD481 participants
Implanted SubjectsICD/CRT-D Device Baseline Programming FrequenciesPacing Mode, VVI/VVIR424 participants
Implanted SubjectsICD/CRT-D Device Baseline Programming FrequenciesATP Status, Before Charging23 participants
Implanted SubjectsICD/CRT-D Device Baseline Programming FrequenciesATP Status, During Charging1089 participants
Implanted SubjectsICD/CRT-D Device Baseline Programming FrequenciesATP Status, Off26 participants
Implanted SubjectsICD/CRT-D Device Baseline Programming FrequenciesVF Detection Enable, On2234 participants
Implanted SubjectsICD/CRT-D Device Baseline Programming FrequenciesVT Detection Enable, On1283 participants
Implanted SubjectsICD/CRT-D Device Baseline Programming FrequenciesVT Detection Enable, Monitor345 participants
Implanted SubjectsICD/CRT-D Device Baseline Programming FrequenciesVF Initial NID, 12/161176 participants
Implanted SubjectsICD/CRT-D Device Baseline Programming FrequenciesVF Initial NID, 18/241077 participants
Implanted SubjectsICD/CRT-D Device Baseline Programming FrequenciesVF Initial NID, 24/322 participants
Implanted SubjectsICD/CRT-D Device Baseline Programming FrequenciesFVT Detection On via VF zone829 participants
Implanted SubjectsICD/CRT-D Device Baseline Programming FrequenciesFVT Detection On via VT zone27 participants
Primary

ICD/CRT-D Device Baseline Programming Measurements

ICD/CRT-D baseline programming measurements, detection interval. Implanted Cardioverter/Defibrillator paces a patient's heart in a tachyarrhythmia prevention-pacing mode. Detection intervals are used to detect atrial tachyarrhythmia. Detection Intervals are programmable heart rate thresholds. R-R intervals that are less than the VT or VF detection intervals (in ms) are considered evidence of VT or VF, respectively. R-R intervals that are between the FVT and the VF detection intervals are considered evidence of FVT. Thus, these detection interval thresholds demarcate rate zones of detection. The rate zones are used to determine the type of therapy applied once detection occurs.

Time frame: Baseline

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Implanted SubjectsICD/CRT-D Device Baseline Programming MeasurementsPace AV168 msStandard Deviation 39.2
Implanted SubjectsICD/CRT-D Device Baseline Programming MeasurementsSense AV139 msStandard Deviation 40.8
Implanted SubjectsICD/CRT-D Device Baseline Programming MeasurementsFVT Detection Interval260 msStandard Deviation 24.6
Implanted SubjectsICD/CRT-D Device Baseline Programming MeasurementsVF Detection Interval314 msStandard Deviation 17.1
Implanted SubjectsICD/CRT-D Device Baseline Programming MeasurementsVT Detection Interval383 msStandard Deviation 25.2
Primary

Implantable Pulse Generator (IPG) Device Baseline Programming Frequencies.

Pacing mode is based on the NASPE/BPEG Generic (NBG) Pacemake coding which includes: I, the chambers paced (V= Ventricle, A=Atrium, D=Dual (A&V), O=None); II, the chambers sensed (V= Ventricle, A=Atrium, D=Dual (A&V), O=None); III, the mode of response (T=Triggered, I=Inhibited, D=Dual Triggered/Inhibited, O=None); IV, the programmable functions(R=Rate Modulated, C=Communicating, M=Multiprogrammable, P=Simple Programmable, O=None); V, the antitachycardia functions (O=None, P=Paced, S=Shocks, D=Dual (P&S)). In addition, MVP (managed ventricular pacing) is a mode that promotes AV conduction by reducing or eliminating unnecessary RV pacing but maintains dual chamber ventricular support in the event that AV conduction is lost.

Time frame: Baseline

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Implanted SubjectsImplantable Pulse Generator (IPG) Device Baseline Programming Frequencies.Pacing Mode, DDD/DDDR81 participants
Implanted SubjectsImplantable Pulse Generator (IPG) Device Baseline Programming Frequencies.Pacing Mode, DDI/DDIR4 participants
Implanted SubjectsImplantable Pulse Generator (IPG) Device Baseline Programming Frequencies.Pacing Mode, MVP_AAIR_DD380 participants
Implanted SubjectsImplantable Pulse Generator (IPG) Device Baseline Programming Frequencies.Pacing Mode, MVP_AAI_DDD148 participants
Implanted SubjectsImplantable Pulse Generator (IPG) Device Baseline Programming Frequencies.Pacing Mode, VVI/VVIR7 participants
Primary

Implanted Systems Frequencies

Frequencies of implanted systems were measured among patients who were implanted with a device (IPT, ICD or CRT-D).

Time frame: Baseline

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Implanted SubjectsImplanted Systems FrequenciesIntrinsic DR (7288)271 participants
Implanted SubjectsImplanted Systems FrequenciesEnRhythm (P1501DR)620 participants
Implanted SubjectsImplanted Systems FrequenciesEnTrust AT (D154ATG)820 participants
Implanted SubjectsImplanted Systems FrequenciesEnTrust VR (D154VRC)321 participants
Implanted SubjectsImplanted Systems FrequenciesInSync Sentry (7297)30 participants
Implanted SubjectsImplanted Systems FrequenciesInSync Sentry (7299)820 participants
Secondary

AV Block Status by Device Type at 6 and 12 Months.

Frequencies of subject with AV block over time between ICD and Implantable Pulse Generator(IPG) study participants.

Time frame: 12 months post enrollment

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)Dispersion
Implanted SubjectsAV Block Status by Device Type at 6 and 12 Months.6 Months: Subjects with MVP enabled, N441 participants 12.5
Implanted SubjectsAV Block Status by Device Type at 6 and 12 Months.6 Months: AV Block 1st degree103 participants
Implanted SubjectsAV Block Status by Device Type at 6 and 12 Months.6 Months: AV Block 2nd degree Type I11 participants
Implanted SubjectsAV Block Status by Device Type at 6 and 12 Months.6 Months: AV Block 2nd degree Type II19 participants
Implanted SubjectsAV Block Status by Device Type at 6 and 12 Months.6 Months: AV Block 3rd degree Intermittent39 participants
Implanted SubjectsAV Block Status by Device Type at 6 and 12 Months.6 Months: AV Block 3rd degree Persistent11 participants
Implanted SubjectsAV Block Status by Device Type at 6 and 12 Months.6 Months: None250 participants
Implanted SubjectsAV Block Status by Device Type at 6 and 12 Months.12 Months: Subjects with MVP enabled, N389 participants
Implanted SubjectsAV Block Status by Device Type at 6 and 12 Months.12 Months: AV Block 1st degree90 participants
Implanted SubjectsAV Block Status by Device Type at 6 and 12 Months.12 Months: AV Block 2nd degree Type I12 participants
Implanted SubjectsAV Block Status by Device Type at 6 and 12 Months.12 Months: AV Block 2nd degree Type II7 participants
Implanted SubjectsAV Block Status by Device Type at 6 and 12 Months.12 Months: AV Block 3rd degree Intermittent30 participants
Implanted SubjectsAV Block Status by Device Type at 6 and 12 Months.12 Months: AV Block 3rd degree Persistent14 participants
Implanted SubjectsAV Block Status by Device Type at 6 and 12 Months.12 Months: None216 participants
ICD (N=1029)AV Block Status by Device Type at 6 and 12 Months.12 Months: AV Block 2nd degree Type II7 participants
ICD (N=1029)AV Block Status by Device Type at 6 and 12 Months.6 Months: Subjects with MVP enabled, N815 participants
ICD (N=1029)AV Block Status by Device Type at 6 and 12 Months.12 Months: Subjects with MVP enabled, N732 participants
ICD (N=1029)AV Block Status by Device Type at 6 and 12 Months.6 Months: AV Block 1st degree167 participants
ICD (N=1029)AV Block Status by Device Type at 6 and 12 Months.12 Months: AV Block 3rd degree Persistent7 participants
ICD (N=1029)AV Block Status by Device Type at 6 and 12 Months.6 Months: AV Block 2nd degree Type I7 participants
ICD (N=1029)AV Block Status by Device Type at 6 and 12 Months.12 Months: AV Block 1st degree159 participants
ICD (N=1029)AV Block Status by Device Type at 6 and 12 Months.6 Months: AV Block 2nd degree Type II7 participants
ICD (N=1029)AV Block Status by Device Type at 6 and 12 Months.12 Months: AV Block 3rd degree Intermittent5 participants
ICD (N=1029)AV Block Status by Device Type at 6 and 12 Months.6 Months: AV Block 3rd degree Intermittent5 participants
ICD (N=1029)AV Block Status by Device Type at 6 and 12 Months.12 Months: AV Block 2nd degree Type I7 participants
ICD (N=1029)AV Block Status by Device Type at 6 and 12 Months.6 Months: AV Block 3rd degree Persistent5 participants
ICD (N=1029)AV Block Status by Device Type at 6 and 12 Months.12 Months: None523 participants
ICD (N=1029)AV Block Status by Device Type at 6 and 12 Months.6 Months: None603 participants
Secondary

AV Block Status by Severity of Historical AV Block

Frequencies of Subjects with AV Block Over Time by Severity of Historical AV Block

Time frame: 4 years post implant

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Implanted SubjectsAV Block Status by Severity of Historical AV Block24 Months: AV Block 2nd degree Type II0 participants
Implanted SubjectsAV Block Status by Severity of Historical AV Block6 Months: AV Block 3rd degree Intermittent2 participants
Implanted SubjectsAV Block Status by Severity of Historical AV Block24 Months: AV Block 3rd degree Intermittent1 participants
Implanted SubjectsAV Block Status by Severity of Historical AV Block12 Months: AV Block 2nd degree Type I0 participants
Implanted SubjectsAV Block Status by Severity of Historical AV Block24 Months: AV Block 3rd degree Persistent0 participants
Implanted SubjectsAV Block Status by Severity of Historical AV Block6 Months: AV Block 2nd degree Type I1 participants
Implanted SubjectsAV Block Status by Severity of Historical AV Block24 Months: None362 participants
Implanted SubjectsAV Block Status by Severity of Historical AV Block12 Months: AV Block 2nd degree Type II1 participants
Implanted SubjectsAV Block Status by Severity of Historical AV Block36 Months: Subjects with MVP enabled324 participants
Implanted SubjectsAV Block Status by Severity of Historical AV Block6 Months: AV Block 3rd degree Persistent3 participants
Implanted SubjectsAV Block Status by Severity of Historical AV Block36 Months: AV Block 1st degree58 participants
Implanted SubjectsAV Block Status by Severity of Historical AV Block12 Months: AV Block 3rd degree Intermittent5 participants
Implanted SubjectsAV Block Status by Severity of Historical AV Block36 Months: AV Block 2nd degree Type I1 participants
Implanted SubjectsAV Block Status by Severity of Historical AV Block6 Months: AV Block 1st degree49 participants
Implanted SubjectsAV Block Status by Severity of Historical AV Block36 Months: AV Block 2nd degree Type II0 participants
Implanted SubjectsAV Block Status by Severity of Historical AV Block12 Months: AV Block 3rd degree Persistent3 participants
Implanted SubjectsAV Block Status by Severity of Historical AV Block36 Months: AV Block 3rd degree Intermittent0 participants
Implanted SubjectsAV Block Status by Severity of Historical AV Block36 Months: AV Block 3rd degree Persistent0 participants
Implanted SubjectsAV Block Status by Severity of Historical AV Block6 Months: None818 participants
Implanted SubjectsAV Block Status by Severity of Historical AV Block36 Months: None253 participants
Implanted SubjectsAV Block Status by Severity of Historical AV Block12 Months: None689 participants
Implanted SubjectsAV Block Status by Severity of Historical AV Block48 Months: Subjects with MVP enabled269 participants
Implanted SubjectsAV Block Status by Severity of Historical AV Block6 Months: AV Block 2nd degree Type II1 participants
Implanted SubjectsAV Block Status by Severity of Historical AV Block48 Months: AV Block 1st degree59 participants
Implanted SubjectsAV Block Status by Severity of Historical AV Block24 Months: Subjects with MVP enabled426 participants
Implanted SubjectsAV Block Status by Severity of Historical AV Block48 Months: AV Block 2nd degree Type I0 participants
Implanted SubjectsAV Block Status by Severity of Historical AV Block12 Months: Subjects with MVP enabled786 participants
Implanted SubjectsAV Block Status by Severity of Historical AV Block48 Months: AV Block 2nd degree Type II0 participants
Implanted SubjectsAV Block Status by Severity of Historical AV Block24 Months: AV Block 1st degree51 participants
Implanted SubjectsAV Block Status by Severity of Historical AV Block48 Months: AV Block 3rd degree Intermittent0 participants
Implanted SubjectsAV Block Status by Severity of Historical AV Block6 Months: Subjects with MVP enabled883 participants
Implanted SubjectsAV Block Status by Severity of Historical AV Block48 Months: AV Block 3rd degree Persistent1 participants
Implanted SubjectsAV Block Status by Severity of Historical AV Block24 Months: AV Block 2nd degree Type I0 participants
Implanted SubjectsAV Block Status by Severity of Historical AV Block48 Months: None201 participants
Implanted SubjectsAV Block Status by Severity of Historical AV Block12 Months: AV Block 1st degree73 participants
ICD (N=1029)AV Block Status by Severity of Historical AV Block48 Months: None17 participants
ICD (N=1029)AV Block Status by Severity of Historical AV Block6 Months: Subjects with MVP enabled373 participants
ICD (N=1029)AV Block Status by Severity of Historical AV Block6 Months: AV Block 1st degree221 participants
ICD (N=1029)AV Block Status by Severity of Historical AV Block6 Months: AV Block 2nd degree Type I17 participants
ICD (N=1029)AV Block Status by Severity of Historical AV Block6 Months: AV Block 2nd degree Type II25 participants
ICD (N=1029)AV Block Status by Severity of Historical AV Block6 Months: AV Block 3rd degree Intermittent42 participants
ICD (N=1029)AV Block Status by Severity of Historical AV Block6 Months: AV Block 3rd degree Persistent13 participants
ICD (N=1029)AV Block Status by Severity of Historical AV Block6 Months: None35 participants
ICD (N=1029)AV Block Status by Severity of Historical AV Block12 Months: Subjects with MVP enabled335 participants
ICD (N=1029)AV Block Status by Severity of Historical AV Block12 Months: AV Block 1st degree176 participants
ICD (N=1029)AV Block Status by Severity of Historical AV Block12 Months: AV Block 2nd degree Type I19 participants
ICD (N=1029)AV Block Status by Severity of Historical AV Block12 Months: AV Block 2nd degree Type II13 participants
ICD (N=1029)AV Block Status by Severity of Historical AV Block12 Months: AV Block 3rd degree Intermittent30 participants
ICD (N=1029)AV Block Status by Severity of Historical AV Block12 Months: AV Block 3rd degree Persistent18 participants
ICD (N=1029)AV Block Status by Severity of Historical AV Block12 Months: None50 participants
ICD (N=1029)AV Block Status by Severity of Historical AV Block24 Months: Subjects with MVP enabled146 participants
ICD (N=1029)AV Block Status by Severity of Historical AV Block24 Months: AV Block 1st degree95 participants
ICD (N=1029)AV Block Status by Severity of Historical AV Block24 Months: AV Block 2nd degree Type I5 participants
ICD (N=1029)AV Block Status by Severity of Historical AV Block24 Months: AV Block 2nd degree Type II3 participants
ICD (N=1029)AV Block Status by Severity of Historical AV Block24 Months: AV Block 3rd degree Intermittent3 participants
ICD (N=1029)AV Block Status by Severity of Historical AV Block24 Months: AV Block 3rd degree Persistent2 participants
ICD (N=1029)AV Block Status by Severity of Historical AV Block24 Months: None24 participants
ICD (N=1029)AV Block Status by Severity of Historical AV Block36 Months: Subjects with MVP enabled105 participants
ICD (N=1029)AV Block Status by Severity of Historical AV Block36 Months: AV Block 1st degree69 participants
ICD (N=1029)AV Block Status by Severity of Historical AV Block36 Months: AV Block 2nd degree Type I3 participants
ICD (N=1029)AV Block Status by Severity of Historical AV Block36 Months: AV Block 2nd degree Type II2 participants
ICD (N=1029)AV Block Status by Severity of Historical AV Block36 Months: AV Block 3rd degree Persistent2 participants
ICD (N=1029)AV Block Status by Severity of Historical AV Block36 Months: None18 participants
ICD (N=1029)AV Block Status by Severity of Historical AV Block48 Months: Subjects with MVP enabled92 participants
ICD (N=1029)AV Block Status by Severity of Historical AV Block48 Months: AV Block 1st degree59 participants
ICD (N=1029)AV Block Status by Severity of Historical AV Block48 Months: AV Block 2nd degree Type I2 participants
ICD (N=1029)AV Block Status by Severity of Historical AV Block48 Months: AV Block 2nd degree Type II1 participants
ICD (N=1029)AV Block Status by Severity of Historical AV Block48 Months: AV Block 3rd degree Intermittent2 participants
ICD (N=1029)AV Block Status by Severity of Historical AV Block48 Months: AV Block 3rd degree Persistent2 participants
ICD (N=1029)AV Block Status by Severity of Historical AV Block36 Months: AV Block 3rd degree Intermittent3 participants
Secondary

Compare First Shock Rate Between Medtronic PainFREE Programming and SCD-HeFT Programming in Primary Prevention Study Participants.

First shock rate for VF and FVT zones was estimated using Kaplan-Meier method. OMNI PainFREE definition: programming combinations that result in ATP therapy for ventricular tachycardia (VT) at cycle lengths \<320 ms. Programming at cycle lengths ≥320 ms were not mandated. OMNI SCD-HeFT definition: programming combinations that result in shock therapy only for arrhythmias at cycle lengths of \<320 ms or faster and no therapy for arrhythmias at cycle lengths ≥320 ms.

Time frame: 4 years post implant

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Implanted SubjectsCompare First Shock Rate Between Medtronic PainFREE Programming and SCD-HeFT Programming in Primary Prevention Study Participants.48 months after implant0.20 rateStandard Deviation 0.014
Implanted SubjectsCompare First Shock Rate Between Medtronic PainFREE Programming and SCD-HeFT Programming in Primary Prevention Study Participants.At implant0 rateStandard Deviation 0
Implanted SubjectsCompare First Shock Rate Between Medtronic PainFREE Programming and SCD-HeFT Programming in Primary Prevention Study Participants.12 months after implant0.10 rateStandard Deviation 0.009
Implanted SubjectsCompare First Shock Rate Between Medtronic PainFREE Programming and SCD-HeFT Programming in Primary Prevention Study Participants.24 months after implant0.14 rateStandard Deviation 0.011
Implanted SubjectsCompare First Shock Rate Between Medtronic PainFREE Programming and SCD-HeFT Programming in Primary Prevention Study Participants.36 months after implant0.18 rateStandard Deviation 0.013
ICD (N=1029)Compare First Shock Rate Between Medtronic PainFREE Programming and SCD-HeFT Programming in Primary Prevention Study Participants.36 months after implant0.24 rateStandard Deviation 0.021
ICD (N=1029)Compare First Shock Rate Between Medtronic PainFREE Programming and SCD-HeFT Programming in Primary Prevention Study Participants.24 months after implant0.21 rateStandard Deviation 0.019
ICD (N=1029)Compare First Shock Rate Between Medtronic PainFREE Programming and SCD-HeFT Programming in Primary Prevention Study Participants.At implant0 rateStandard Deviation 0
ICD (N=1029)Compare First Shock Rate Between Medtronic PainFREE Programming and SCD-HeFT Programming in Primary Prevention Study Participants.48 months after implant0.27 rateStandard Deviation 0.023
ICD (N=1029)Compare First Shock Rate Between Medtronic PainFREE Programming and SCD-HeFT Programming in Primary Prevention Study Participants.12 months after implant0.15 rateStandard Deviation 0.017
Secondary

Frequencies of Subjects With OptiVol Trends and Disease Progression.

Estimate the correlation between OptiVol trends and disease progression. A subject's disease status was said to have progressed if: 1. The NYHA classification number increases (example: I to II), or 2. The LVEF decreases by at least 20% (relative difference) and by at least a 5% absolute difference, or 3. The subject expires A subject who crossed OptiVol threshold since last visit was regarded as 'crossed threshold'.

Time frame: 4 years post implant

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Implanted SubjectsFrequencies of Subjects With OptiVol Trends and Disease Progression.Disease Progressed, N97 participants
Implanted SubjectsFrequencies of Subjects With OptiVol Trends and Disease Progression.Crossed Threshold, N382 participants
ICD (N=1029)Frequencies of Subjects With OptiVol Trends and Disease Progression.Crossed Threshold, N327 participants
ICD (N=1029)Frequencies of Subjects With OptiVol Trends and Disease Progression.Disease Progressed, N95 participants
36-month Follow-upFrequencies of Subjects With OptiVol Trends and Disease Progression.Disease Progressed, N93 participants
36-month Follow-upFrequencies of Subjects With OptiVol Trends and Disease Progression.Crossed Threshold, N287 participants
48-month Follow-upFrequencies of Subjects With OptiVol Trends and Disease Progression.Disease Progressed, N84 participants
48-month Follow-upFrequencies of Subjects With OptiVol Trends and Disease Progression.Crossed Threshold, N224 participants
Secondary

Summary of ATP Episodes Within All Treated Episodes

Evaluate the utility of the Antitachycardia Pacing (ATP) During Charging feature of the device.

Time frame: 4 years post enrollment

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Implanted SubjectsSummary of ATP Episodes Within All Treated EpisodesNumber of episodes analyzed from 343 participants1584 Episodes
Implanted SubjectsSummary of ATP Episodes Within All Treated EpisodesEpisodes with ATP attempted1100 Episodes
Implanted SubjectsSummary of ATP Episodes Within All Treated EpisodesEpisodes with Sucessful ATP650 Episodes

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 20, 2026