Skip to content

A Phase II Clinical Trial of PXD101 in Patients With Recurrent or Refractory Cutaneous and Peripheral T-Cell Lymphomas

A Phase II Clinical Trial of PXD101 in Patients With Recurrent or Refractory Cutaneous and Peripheral T-Cell Lymphomas

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00274651
Acronym
PXD101-CLN-6
Enrollment
53
Registered
2006-01-11
Start date
2006-01-31
Completion date
2009-07-31
Last updated
2015-07-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma, Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma, Peripheral T-Cell Lymphoma

Keywords

CTCL, PTCL, lymphoma, Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma, Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphomas (CTCL), Peripheral T-Cell Lymphomas (PTCL), Other Types of Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma, belinostat

Brief summary

Open-label, non-randomized trial to assess the effectiveness of PXD101 in patients with recurrent or refractory cutaneous or peripheral and other types of T-cell lymphomas. PXD101 is a new, potent histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor. Patients are treated with belinostat(PXD101) 1000 mg/m2 on days 1-5 of a 21 day cycle.

Interventions

DRUGbelinostat

Sponsors

Valerio Therapeutics
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Male or female with age \> or = 18 years. * Histologically confirmed diagnosis of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL) or peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL) or other T-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). * Must have failed at least one line of prior systemic therapy. No limitation in number of prior therapies. CTCL patients who are refractory or intolerant to oral Targretin are also eligible. * The presence of measurable disease (defined as \> or = 1 cm with radiographic imaging) for PTCL or stage 1B or greater disease for CTCL and assessable by the severity-weighted assessment tool (SWAT). * Adequate bone marrow and hepatic function including the following: * Absolute neutrophil count \> or = 1,000 cells/mm3, platelets \> or = 40,000/mm3 * Total bilirubin \< or = 1.5 x upper normal limit or \< or = 3 x upper normal limit if hepatic involvement * AST (SGOT) (aspartate aminotransferase), ALT (SGPT) (alanine aminotransferase) \< or = 2.5 x upper normal limit (\< or = 5 x upper normal limit if hepatic involvement) * Hemoglobin \> or = 9.0 g/dL. * Serum potassium within normal range. * Karnofsky performance status \> or = 70%. * Estimated life expectancy \> 3 months. * Signed informed consent approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB).

Exclusion criteria

* Anti-cancer therapies within 4 weeks of first PXD101 administration should be excluded unless toxicity from prior anti-cancer therapy has resolved or returned to baseline and cancer disease status warrants. * Any use of investigational drugs within 4 weeks prior to study registration. * Major surgery within 4 weeks of study drug administration. * Prior allogeneic bone marrow transplant. * A diagnosis of adult T-cell lymphoma/leukemia (ATLL) or precursor T-lymphoblastic lymphoma. * Co-existing active infection or any co-existing medical condition likely to interfere with trial procedures. However, patients with progressing CTCL whose open skin lesions are frequently infected may not be excluded from this trial at the discretion of Investigators. * Clinically significant cardiovascular disease including unstable angina pectoris, uncontrolled hypertension, and congestive heart failure related to primary cardiac disease, a condition requiring anti-arrhythmic therapy, history of sustained ventricular tachycardia, history of ventricular fibrillation or Torsade de Pointes, bradycardia (HR\<50bpm) with or without a pacemaker, bifascicular block with a right bundle branch block and a left anterior block, ischemic or severe valvular heart disease, a myocardial infarction within 6 months or a left ventricular ejection fraction \< 40% (by echocardiogram \[ECHO\] or multigated acquisition scan \[MUGA\]) within 3 months of study enrolment. * A marked baseline prolongation of QT/QTc ((corrected) QT) interval, e.g., repeated demonstration of a QTc interval \> 450 milliseconds (msec). Long QT Syndrome; the required use of concomitant medication on belinostat infusion days that may cause Torsade de Pointes. * Renal insufficiency defined as a calculated creatinine clearance of \< 45 mL/min/1.73 m2. * A history of allergic reactions attributed to compounds of similar chemical or biological composition to PXD101 and L-arginine. * Clinically significant central nervous system disorders with altered mental status or psychiatric disorders precluding understanding of the informed consent process and/or completion of the necessary studies. * Patients requiring treatment for other malignant diseases or less than 5 years post-treatment completion for an invasive malignant disease (excluding non-melanotic skin cancers or cervical cancer in-situ). Patients with any history of melanoma should be excluded. * Pregnant or breast-feeding women, and women of childbearing age and potential, who are not willing to use effective contraception. Male patients and/or their fertile female partners who are not willing to use contraceptives during the trial. * Known infection with HIV, human T-cell leukemia virus type-1 (HTLV-1), hepatitis B or hepatitis C.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Objective Response Rate in Patients With Recurrent or Refractory Cutaneous T-cell Lymphoma (CTCL)throughout the study, or for a maximum of 2 yearsTumor response was assessed using Cheson (Cheson 2007) and SWAT criteria. The SWAT score represents the product of the percentage total body surface area (TBSA) involvement of each lesion type (patch, plaque, and tumor or ulceration), multiplied by a weighting factor.
Objective Response Rate in Patients With Recurrent or Refractory Peripheral T-cell Lymphoma (PTCL))throughout the study, or for a maximum of 2 yearsTumor response was assessed using the revised criteria of Cheson (Cheson 2007).Tumor assessments were done using conventional radiographic methods, e.g. CT or CT/PET.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Time to Progressionthroughout the study, or for a maximum of 2 yearsTime to progression was defined as the interval between the first date of treatment and the first notation of disease progression.
Time to Responsethroughout the study, or for a maximum of 2 yearsTime to response was defined as the interval between the first date of treatment and the first notation of response.
Duration of Responsethroughout the study, or for a maximum of 2 yearsDuration of response was defined as the time from first notation of response until the time of first notation of disease progression.

Countries

France, Germany, Israel, Thailand, United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
CTCL (ITT Population)
CTCL patients will receive 1000 mg/m2 of PXD101 IV belinostat: 1000 mg/m2 for 5 days every 21 days; IV
29
PTCL (ITT Population)
PTCL patients will receive 1000 mg/m2 of PXD101 IV belinostat: 1000 mg/m2 for 5 days every 21 days; IV
24
Total53

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event63
Overall StudyDeath13
Overall StudyLack of Efficacy136
Overall StudyPhysician Decision87
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject01

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicCTCL (ITT Population)PTCL (ITT Population)Total
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
17 Participants12 Participants29 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
12 Participants12 Participants24 Participants
Age, Continuous64.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.4
58.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.9
61.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.7
Region of Enrollment
France
2 participants0 participants2 participants
Region of Enrollment
Germany
1 participants0 participants1 participants
Region of Enrollment
Israel
2 participants1 participants3 participants
Region of Enrollment
Thailand
2 participants6 participants8 participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
22 participants17 participants39 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
15 Participants7 Participants22 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
14 Participants17 Participants31 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
29 / 2923 / 24
serious
Total, serious adverse events
7 / 298 / 24

Outcome results

Primary

Objective Response Rate in Patients With Recurrent or Refractory Cutaneous T-cell Lymphoma (CTCL)

Tumor response was assessed using Cheson (Cheson 2007) and SWAT criteria. The SWAT score represents the product of the percentage total body surface area (TBSA) involvement of each lesion type (patch, plaque, and tumor or ulceration), multiplied by a weighting factor.

Time frame: throughout the study, or for a maximum of 2 years

Population: At termination OR was noted in 1/13 patients (Simon Stage 1). With 29 patients in the CTCL arm the demand for expansion to Simon Stage 2 lacked 5 patients and the study was stopped. Instead OR was done as secondary efficacy analysis (ITT and PP (per protocol)) with OR calculated without accounting for Simon design and with 95% confidence intervals

Primary

Objective Response Rate in Patients With Recurrent or Refractory Peripheral T-cell Lymphoma (PTCL))

Tumor response was assessed using the revised criteria of Cheson (Cheson 2007).Tumor assessments were done using conventional radiographic methods, e.g. CT or CT/PET.

Time frame: throughout the study, or for a maximum of 2 years

Population: Primary efficacy analysis is based on the ITT analysis set, where the OR are calculated, and the proportion ± 80% CI (confidence interval) specified by Koyama \& Chen (2008) are presented

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Arm A (CTCL, ITT Population)Objective Response Rate in Patients With Recurrent or Refractory Peripheral T-cell Lymphoma (PTCL))25 percentage of patients with OR
Secondary

Duration of Response

Duration of response was defined as the time from first notation of response until the time of first notation of disease progression.

Time frame: throughout the study, or for a maximum of 2 years

Population: Duration of response (ITT population) was estimated by Kaplan-Meier method for CTCL/PTCL arms. 2 CTCL and 2 PTCL patients did not progress and were censored. Median duration of response and full range (days) are presented for 2 patients with CTCL and 4 patients with PTCL. The 2 CTCL patients being evaluable had response durations of 56 and 129 days

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Arm A (CTCL, ITT Population)Duration of Response83 Days
Arm B (PTCL, ITT Population)Duration of Response109 Days
Secondary

Time to Progression

Time to progression was defined as the interval between the first date of treatment and the first notation of disease progression.

Time frame: throughout the study, or for a maximum of 2 years

Population: Time to Progression (ITT population) was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method for CTCL and PTCL arms. As progression was not observed in six patients in Arm A and 10 patients in Arm B, a total of 37 patients progressed, and the the median time to progression and the full range (days) are presented.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Arm A (CTCL, ITT Population)Time to Progression43 Days
Arm B (PTCL, ITT Population)Time to Progression82 Days
Secondary

Time to Response

Time to response was defined as the interval between the first date of treatment and the first notation of response.

Time frame: throughout the study, or for a maximum of 2 years

Population: Time to response (ITT population) was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method for CTCL and PTCL arms. For 4 patients with CTCL and 6 patients with PTCL, response was recorded. The median time to response and the full range (days) are presented.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Arm A (CTCL, ITT Population)Time to Response40 Days
Arm B (PTCL, ITT Population)Time to Response100 Days
Post Hoc

Objective Response Rate in Patients With Recurrent or Refractory Cutaneous T-cell Lymphoma (CTCL)

Tumor response was assessed using Cheson (Cheson 2007) and SWAT criteria. The SWAT score represents the product of the percentage total body surface area (TBSA) involvement of each lesion type (patch, plaque, and tumor or ulceration), multiplied by a weighting factor.

Time frame: throughout the study, or for a maximum of 2 years

Population: At termination OR was noted in 1/13 patients (Simon Stage 1). With 29 patients in the CTCL arm the demand for expansion to Simon Stage 2 lacked 5 patients and the study was stopped. Instead OR was done as secondary efficacy analysis (ITT and PP (per protocol)) with OR calculated without accounting for Simon design and with 95% confidence intervals

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Arm A (CTCL, ITT Population)Objective Response Rate in Patients With Recurrent or Refractory Cutaneous T-cell Lymphoma (CTCL)4 participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 19, 2026