Skip to content

Evaluation of Surgisis Gold Graft for Incision Reinforcement After Open Bariatric Surgery

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00274625
Enrollment
402
Registered
2006-01-11
Start date
2005-08-31
Completion date
2012-09-30
Last updated
2014-11-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hernia, Obesity

Keywords

Biomaterials, Bariatric Surgery, Hernia, Prevention of, Obesity, Bypass Surgery, Incisional Hernia, Ventral Hernia

Brief summary

The primary objective is to compare the effectiveness of the Surgisis Gold Graft to suture closure alone in preventing an incisional hernia after open bariatric surgery.

Detailed description

This will be a prospective, randomized clinical trial comparing outcomes of use of a sublay of Surgisis Gold Graft for tissue reinforcement, as compared to suture closure alone in evaluating incidence of incisional hernias. Prior to undergoing open bariatric surgery, patients will be randomized to receive either Surgisis Gold Graft or suture closure alone. Subjects will be seen for follow-up visits at six weeks, three months, six months, one year and two years post-operatively. Patients may see their primary care physician for the one and two follow-up visits.

Interventions

DEVICESurgisis Gold Graft

Surgisis Gold Graft is placed as an underlay following open bariatric surgery.

PROCEDUREControl

Incision is closed without the placement of a graft material (standard of care control)

Sponsors

Cook Biotech Incorporated
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
MED Institute, Incorporated
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Cook Group Incorporated
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Planned operative approach via upper midline incision with goal of weight loss * 18 years of age or older * Body mass index (BMI) \>= 30 kg/m2 * Documented history of non-surgical attempts at weight loss * Patients undergoing reoperation for a failed previous bariatric procedure are eligible provided the operation is being performed for weight loss and provided at the time of reoperation there is no incisional hernia * Patients with small, non-incarcerated, previously unrepaired umbilical hernias are acceptable provided the hernia defect is no greater than 2.5 cm in diameter

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with pre-existing midline abdominal wall incisional hernia or diastasis rectus * Patients undergoing repeat bariatric surgery for complications of a previous bariatric procedure * Patients with a previous upper midline incision found to have an incisional hernia * Patients with connective tissue disorders known to predispose to hernia formation * Active infection at the time of proposed surgery * Sensitivity or religious objections to porcine products

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Incisional Hernia2 yearsAn obvious defect or interruption of the fascia in the area of the incision that was palpable on clinical examination and/or visible by a cross-sectional imaging modality.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Surgisis Gold
Surgisis Gold Graft is placed as an underlay following open bariatric surgery.
185
Suture Closure
Control : Incision is closed without the placement of a graft material (standard of care control)
195
Total380

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyExcluded from analysis148
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up4654

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicSurgisis GoldSuture ClosureTotal
Age, Continuous44.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.6
45.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.1
44.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.4
BMI (Body mass index)48.2 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.2
48.2 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.7
48.2 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.9
Sex: Female, Male
Female
146 Participants156 Participants302 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
39 Participants39 Participants78 Participants
Weight138 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 30
143 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 34
140.6 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 32.2

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
87 / 18562 / 195
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 1850 / 195

Outcome results

Primary

Incisional Hernia

An obvious defect or interruption of the fascia in the area of the incision that was palpable on clinical examination and/or visible by a cross-sectional imaging modality.

Time frame: 2 years

Population: 14 patients in Surgisis Gold group and 8 patients in Suture Closure group were excluded from the analysis, because prior to procedure, either they were found not to meet the inclusion/exclusion criteria, or they chose not to participate.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Surgisis GoldIncisional Hernia32 participants
Suture ClosureIncisional Hernia38 participants
p-value: 0.6Fisher Exact

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026