Skip to content

Ultrasound as a Diagnostic Tool for Occult Hip Fractures

A Prospective Study of the Specificity and Sensitivity of Ultrasound in Diagnosing Occult Hip Fractures

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00274196
Enrollment
30
Registered
2006-01-10
Start date
2006-02-28
Completion date
2008-06-30
Last updated
2007-11-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Occult Fractures

Keywords

fractures, occult, hip, ultrasound examination, MRI, sensitivity, specificity

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to measure the sensitivity and specificity of ultrasound exam of the hip in diagnosing occult hip fractures.

Detailed description

Introduction: Most hip fractures are diagnosed by history, physical examination and confirmed by plain radiographs. When initial X-rays are negative or equivocal, and there is a clinical suspicion of occult hip fracture, additional diagnostic tests are necessary such as MRI which is expensive and in many hospitals less available, or bone scan which needs to be delayed 48-72 hours from injury to be indicative. Ultrasound examination has been shown to be an accurate measurement to diagnose occult fractures in the ankle and is a relatively easy, available, non-expansive examination. We propose the use of bedside ultrasound examination of the hip as a screening tool for occult hip fractures. Objective: To measure the sensitivity and specificity of ultrasound exam of the hip in diagnosing or ruling out occult hip fractures. Materials and methods: We will include all patients 40 years and older with a painful hip after an injury, and with normal hip X-rays. Each patient will undergo two hip ultrasounds by two different examiners. Afterwards, the patients will undergo MRI of the hip. The MRI will serve as the gold standard for treatment decisions. The results of the ultrasound will be compared to the MRI to evaluate its sensitivity and specificity.

Interventions

PROCEDUREultrasound examination

a single time 10 minutes procedure within the first week after the injury

PROCEDUREMRI scan

a single time 30 minutes procedure, performed always after the ultrasound scan

Sponsors

Hadassah Medical Organization
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
40 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients aged 40 years or older, with suspected hip fracture but normal plain X-rays

Exclusion criteria

* Patients younger than 40 years and with contra-indications for MRI scan

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Comparison between ultrasound exam and MRI (sensitivity and specificity)2008

Countries

Israel

Contacts

Primary ContactCharles Milgrom, MD
charles.milgrom@ekmd.huji.ac.il00 972 50 7874401
Backup ContactOri Safran, MD
oris@hadassah.org.il00 972 50 7874705

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026