Skip to content

Effects of a 9-months Treatment of SPIRIVA on Health Related Quality of Life in Patients With COPD

Effect of a 9-month Treatment of SPIRIVA® on Health Related Quality of Life in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. Validation of a New HRQoL Questionnaire Appropriate to Common Daily Practice. (TIPHON Study)

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00274053
Enrollment
555
Registered
2006-01-10
Start date
2002-04-30
Completion date
2004-04-30
Last updated
2013-11-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to investigate the effect of a 9-month treatment of tiotropium (SPIRIVA®) 18 mcg once daily on Health Related Quality of Life and lung function in patients with a Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.

Detailed description

This was a multicentre, randomised, double blind, parallel group, placebo-controlled, 9 month study. It was designed to determine the effect of inhaled tiotropium treatment on quality of life in patients with COPD. Following an initial 2-week screening period, patients were randomized to either tiotropium or placebo at Visit 2. Patients returned to the clinic at month 3 (Visit 3), 6 (Visit 4), and 9 (Visit 5) for the conclusion of the trial. The patients received treatment daily for 9 months. Quality of life was measured on each visit by using the Saint george's respiratory Questionnaire. Additionally a short form questionnaire was developped for that study (Visual Simplified Respiratory Questionnaire). Lung function was also measured at each visit by spirometry. Study Hypothesis: The primary objective of this study is to compare the efficacy of Tiotropium and placebo on improving HRQoL evaluated by the percentage of SGRQ responders. The null hypothesis is that there is no difference in the effect on HRQoL assessed by the percentage of SGRQ responders between the two treatment groups. The alternative hypothesis is that there is a difference in effect on HRQoL assessed by the percentage of SGRQ responders between tiotropium and placebo. The test will be performed at the alpha = 0.05 level of significance. Comparison(s): Tiotropium 18 mcg once daily vs Placebo

Interventions

DRUGtiotropium

Sponsors

Boehringer Ingelheim
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
40 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Diagnosis of COPD and matching the following criteria: * Baseline 20 % \< FEV1 \< 70 % of European Community of Coal and Steel (ECCS) predicted values . * Baseline FEV1/SVC\< 70 %. Smoking history \> 10 pack-years (p.y.). A p.y. was defined as the equivalent of smoking one pack of cigarettes per day for one year.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
responder rate on SGRQ questionnaire (% of patients improved by more than 4 points)

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
changes in SGRQ scores, VSRQ scores, spirometric parameters (FEV1, FVC, FIV1, SVC, IC) ; incidence, severity and duration of acute exacerbations, PGE

Countries

France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026