Skip to content

Mechanisms of Dyspnea Relief During Exercise in COPD Patients Following Treatment With Tiotropium (Spiriva)

Randomised, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Cross-Over Study to Examine the Effects of Tiotropium on Lung Hyperinflation, Respiratory Mechanics and Dyspnea During Exercise in Patients With COPD

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00274027
Enrollment
19
Registered
2006-01-10
Start date
2001-01-31
Completion date
2003-03-31
Last updated
2013-11-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive

Brief summary

To explore the mechanisms of dyspnea relief during exercise in patients with COPD following treatment with tiotropium bromide (Spiriva)

Detailed description

This was a single-centre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over study. The duration of subject participation was 9 weeks. There was an initial screening period of up to 2 weeks. The first screening visit consisted of medical history, clinical assessment, chronic dyspnea evaluation, complete pulmonary function testing, and a symptom-limited maximal incremental cycle exercise test. A second visit during the screening period was intended as a training of the subject to the procedures to be performed in the study, with specific focus on familiarisation with the constant work rate exercise test. The screening period was followed by 2 x 7 day treatment periods (1 x tiotropium and 1 x placebo), separated by a 4 week washout period. On the last day of each treatment period, the subject visited the clinic to complete a series of trial related procedures, including lung function measurements and a constant work rate exercise test at 75% Wcap to symptom limitation. Testing consisted of pulmonary function testing, dyspnea evaluation, and symptom-limited constant-load cycle exercise tests with measurements of cardiopulmonary parameters, symptom intensity and pulmonary mechanics. \\ Study Hypothesis: Dynamic hyperinflation restricts volume expansion during exercise and is suspected as a primary mechanism of dyspnea. The dissociation between drive or muscular effort to breathe and the mechanical response to increased volume (as reflected by an increased Pes/PImax: VT/predicted VC ratio) correlates well with the intensity of inspiratory difficulty during exercise in COPD. It was hypothesised that reduced Borg ratings at a standardized exercise level after tiotropium would correlate strongly with reduced restricted volume expansion during exercise (i.e., increased VT/IC and EILV/TLC ratios, and decreased IC and IRV). In other words, dyspnea and its predominant qualitative dimensions (i.e., inspiratory difficulty) result from patients being forced by DH to breathe at a high lung volume, at or above predicted TLC. Comparison(s): tiotropium bromide (Spiriva) vs. placebo

Interventions

DRUGtiotropium bromide

Sponsors

Boehringer Ingelheim
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
40 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) with FEV1 \< 70% predicted and FRC \> 120% predicted, a cigarette smoking history \> 20 pack-years, and moderate to severe chronic dyspnea

Exclusion criteria

patients with a history of asthma, allergic rhinitis or atopy; patients who participated in a rehabilitation program for COPD within 6 weeks prior to screening

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Borg dyspnea rating at a standardized exercise time (DyspneaSTD) during a constant work rate exercise challenge to symptom limitation at 75% maximal work capacityup to 7 weeks

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Endurance timeup to 7 weeks
Borg leg discomfortup to 7 weeks
Qualitative aspects of dyspneaup to 7 weeks
Locus of sensory limitation7 weeks

Countries

Canada

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026