Skip to content

Study Evaluating the Safety of Etanercept in Rheumatoid Arthritis, Ankylosing Spondylitis and Psoriatic Arthritis

Open Label Study To Evaluate The Safety Profile And The Quality Of Life In Patients Receiving Etanercept For The Treatment Of Rheumatoid Arthritis, Ankylosing Spondylitis And Psoriatic Arthritis

Status
Terminated
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00273858
Enrollment
880
Registered
2006-01-09
Start date
2006-03-31
Completion date
2010-07-31
Last updated
2011-09-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Ankylosing Spondylitis, Arthritis, Psoriatic, Arthritis, Rheumatoid, Spondylitis, Ankylosing

Keywords

Rheumatoid Arthritis, Ankylosing Spondylitis, Psoriatic Arthritis

Brief summary

This is a Phase 4 open label, non-interventional, multi-center study to evaluate the safety of Enbrel (etanercept) treatment in patients receiving etanercept 25mg sc twice weekly or 50mg of etanercept once weekly. The improvement of health-related quality of life will also be evaluated.

Detailed description

Patients already prescribed to receive etanercept for the first time for treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis, Ankylosing Spondylitis or Psoriatic Arthritis according to the Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC). Patients have been recruited sequentially based on eligibility criteria up to the number limit assigned to each site.

Interventions

OTHERThere is no Intervention. The study is observational.

The study is observational and the prescription follows the SmPC of etanercept.

Sponsors

Wyeth is now a wholly owned subsidiary of Pfizer
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* 18 years of age or older at time of consent * Satisfies the 1987 ACR Revised Criteria for Rheumatoid Arthritis or has a diagnosis of ankylosing spondylitis or psoriatic arthritis, as determined by the doctor * Provides informed consent * Demonstrate a negative serum or urine pregnancy test prior to administration of etanercept. Sexually active women participating in the study must use a medically acceptable form of contraception. * Patients already prescribed etanercept according to approved labelling

Exclusion criteria

* Has hypersensitivity to etanercept * Has sepsis or risk of sepsis. Treatment with etanercept should not be initiated in patients with active infections (ie. hepatitis C, hepatitis B, active TBC) * Is pregnant or breast-feeding * Has significant concurrent medical diseases including, uncompensated congestive heart failure, myocardial infarction within 12 months, unstable angina pectoris, or history of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection, immunodeficiency syndromes, or central nervous system (CNS) demyelinating events suggestive of multiple sclerosis * Has a history of confirmed blood dyscrasias * Received any live (attenuated) vaccines within 4 weeks of screening visit

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)Baseline up to Month 24Any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug was considered an AE, without regard to possibility of causal relationship. An AE resulting in any of the following outcomes, or deemed to be significant for any other reason, was considered to be a SAE: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; a life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly.
Number of Participants Who Discontinued TreatmentBaseline up to Month 24
Number of Participants by Reasons for Discontinuation of TreatmentBaseline up to Month 24

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) at 24 MonthBaseline, Month 24HAQ is a measure of functional limitations. Participants were rated on 4 point scale with scores as 'normal' (no difficulty=0), 'adequate' (some difficulty= 1), 'limited' (much difficulty=2), and 'unable to do' (=3) based on degree of difficulty they experienced with 20 tasks grouped into 8 areas of dressing, rising, hygiene, reach, walking, eating, grip and activities. HAQ total scores were expressed as overall mean score ranging from 0 to 3: 0-0.25=normal functioning; 0.25-0.5=mild functional limitation; 0.5-1=moderate functional limitation; greater than 1=significant functional limitation.
Change From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PtGA) Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at 24 MonthBaseline, Month 24PtGA measured using a 100 mm VAS ranging from 0 = very good to 100 = very bad.
Change From Baseline in Physician Global Assessment (PGA) VAS at 24 MonthBaseline, Month 24PGA was measured on a 0 to 100 mm VAS, with 0 mm = no disease activity to 100 mm = worst disease activity possible.

Countries

Greece

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Etanercept
Etanercept administered subcutaneously (s.c.) at a dose of 25 milligram (mg) twice weekly or 50 mg once weekly for 24 months.
880
Total880

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyAdverse Event81
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up101
Overall StudyNot completed 24 month observation time334
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject21

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicEtanercept
Age Continuous52.0 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.6
Sex: Female, Male
Female
562 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
318 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
455 / 880
serious
Total, serious adverse events
36 / 880

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Participants by Reasons for Discontinuation of Treatment

Time frame: Baseline up to Month 24

Population: Safety population included all participants who received at least one dose of etanercept.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
EtanerceptNumber of Participants by Reasons for Discontinuation of TreatmentLost to follow-up101 Participants
EtanerceptNumber of Participants by Reasons for Discontinuation of TreatmentWithdrawal by participants21 Participants
EtanerceptNumber of Participants by Reasons for Discontinuation of TreatmentAEs60 Participants
EtanerceptNumber of Participants by Reasons for Discontinuation of TreatmentSAEs21 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants Who Discontinued Treatment

Time frame: Baseline up to Month 24

Population: Safety population included all participants who received at least one dose of etanercept.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
EtanerceptNumber of Participants Who Discontinued Treatment203 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

Any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug was considered an AE, without regard to possibility of causal relationship. An AE resulting in any of the following outcomes, or deemed to be significant for any other reason, was considered to be a SAE: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; a life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly.

Time frame: Baseline up to Month 24

Population: Safety population included all participants who received at least one dose of etanercept.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
EtanerceptNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)AEs455 Participants
EtanerceptNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)SAEs36 Participants
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) at 24 Month

HAQ is a measure of functional limitations. Participants were rated on 4 point scale with scores as 'normal' (no difficulty=0), 'adequate' (some difficulty= 1), 'limited' (much difficulty=2), and 'unable to do' (=3) based on degree of difficulty they experienced with 20 tasks grouped into 8 areas of dressing, rising, hygiene, reach, walking, eating, grip and activities. HAQ total scores were expressed as overall mean score ranging from 0 to 3: 0-0.25=normal functioning; 0.25-0.5=mild functional limitation; 0.5-1=moderate functional limitation; greater than 1=significant functional limitation.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 24

Population: Data was not analyzed as the usage of the questionnaire was not considered to be part of usual clinical practice at the time of the study and thus was not to be used in the framework of a non-interventional trial.

Secondary

Change From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PtGA) Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at 24 Month

PtGA measured using a 100 mm VAS ranging from 0 = very good to 100 = very bad.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 24

Population: Data was not analyzed as the usage of the scale was not considered to be part of usual clinical practice at the time of the study and thus was not to be used in the framework of a non-interventional trial.

Secondary

Change From Baseline in Physician Global Assessment (PGA) VAS at 24 Month

PGA was measured on a 0 to 100 mm VAS, with 0 mm = no disease activity to 100 mm = worst disease activity possible.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 24

Population: Data was not analyzed as the usage of the scale was not considered to be part of usual clinical practice at the time of the study and thus was not to be used in the framework of a non-interventional trial.

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026