Skip to content

BaSES Trial: Basel Starch Evaluation in Sepsis

Basel Study for Evaluation of Starch (130;0.4) Infusion in Septic Patients: BaSES (130;0.4) Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00273728
Acronym
BaSES
Enrollment
231
Registered
2006-01-09
Start date
2005-05-31
Completion date
2011-05-31
Last updated
2011-08-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Sepsis, Septic Shock, Severe Sepsis

Keywords

Hydroxyethyl Starch, shock, septic, infusion, intravenous, mortality

Brief summary

Background: In patients with severe sepsis and septic shock early aggressive volume replacement reduced mortality. Standard infusion therapy consists of crystalloid infusions. The role of modern, low molecular weight, starch preparations and their influence on the course of disease is not determined yet. Hypothesis: The purpose of this study is to determine wether initial infusion therapy with Hydroxyethylstarch and Ringer's lactate reduces in septic patients reduces Intensive Care Unit and hospital length of stay without impairment of renal function Design: Double-blind, randomized, controlled monocentric study Setting: Intensive Care Units of a University Hospital Patients: 240 consecutive patients with sepsis, severe sepsis and septic shock Intervention: Volume therapy with Ringer's lactate and saline or hydroxy-ethyl starch (MW 130, substitution 0.4) in the first five days of intensive care treatment. Parameter: * Intensive Care length of stay * Hospital length of stay * Mortality * Kidney function Statistics: Mann-Whitney test for non-parametric data like intensive care length of stay. Unpaired t-Test for kidney function parameters. Study withdrawal: Significant impairment of kidney function parameters in the hydroxy-ethyl starch group

Interventions

DRUGhydroxy-ethyl starch (MW 130; 0.4) vs. normal saline

hydroxy-ethyl starch together with ringer's lactate versus physiologic saline together with saline

Sponsors

Fresenius AG
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients with suspected or proven infection and 2 of the following 6 criteria: * Body temperature \<36 or \>38.3° celsius * Heart rate \> 90 beats/min * Tachypnea \> 20/min or a arterial pCO2 below 4.25 kPa * White blood cell count higher than 12.000 or below 4.000 or more than 10% immature forms * Systolic blood pressure \<90 mmHg or mean arterial pressure \< 65 mmHg * Altered mental state or oliguria

Exclusion criteria

* Pregnancy * Age below 18 * Allergy against Hydroxyethyl starch * Chronic renal insufficiency

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Intensive Care length of staytime to discharge from the Intensive care unit
Hospital length of staytime to discharge from the hospital
Mortalityintesive care, hospital and one year mortality

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Kidney functionat intensive care discharge and after one year
Lung functionduring intensive care

Countries

Switzerland

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 29, 2026