Skip to content

Comparison of Vasopressin and Other Pressors in Septic Shock

Comparative Prospective Study of Vasopressin and Catecholamine in Septic Shock

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00269685
Enrollment
20
Registered
2005-12-23
Start date
2000-07-31
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2006-05-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Shock, Septic

Keywords

Septic shock, catecholamine, vasopressin, tonometria, lactate

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the classical tactics in the treatment of septic shock (dopamine, noradrenalin and dobutamine) to the use of vasopressin as first choice pressor. Vasopressin seems to be an interesting alternative in the treatment of septic shock. To this date, available studies have showed that it could correct hyperkinetic syndrome and vasoplegia in septic shocks without noticeable side effect. It as been demonstrated that vasopressin improves renal function, as no effect on digestive organs and as no metabolic effect.

Interventions

DRUGvasopressin

Sponsors

Université de Sherbrooke
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Legally major patient presenting a septic shock. The time window between beginning of symptoms and onset of treatment is established at 12 hours. The patient must be intubated and mechanically ventilated. Patient presenting a mean arterial blood pressure of less than 60 mm Hg after adequate fluid resuscitation (at least 1 L of colloid or crystalloid) and 10 ug/Kg/min of dopamine. Patient presenting a cardiac index of at least 3 L/min/m2

Exclusion criteria

* Shock other than septic * cardiac hypokinesia * a pre-existing organic renal failure that needs hemodyalisis * oesophagal or gastric phatology that would lead to a naso-gastric tube contraindication

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
To compare the efficiency of vasopressine to the standard and usual treatment of septic shock on the reverse of the hemodynamic criterion of septic shock

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
To compare these two categories of treatment on:
tonometric parameters
renal function
in term of tolerance: metabolic effects (increase in lactate and glycaemia), cardiac effects (tachycardia being defined as a heart rate increase of 15%), increase of cardiac enzymes (troponine, CK, CK-MB), and cutanuous vasoconstriction.

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026