Atherosclerosis
Conditions
Keywords
Coronary artery disease, Lipoprotein-associated Phospholipase A2, palpography, hs-CRP, endothelial function, intravascular ultrasound
Brief summary
IBIS-2 is a study using SB-480848 versus placebo in subjects with angiographically documented coronary heart disease. Endpoints include coronary imaging, endothelial function, biomarkers, safety and tolerability.
Detailed description
Integrated Biomarker and Imaging Study -2 (IBIS-2): An International, Multicenter, Randomized, Placebo-controlled, Parallel-group, 1 Year Treatment, Integrated Biomarkers and Imaging Study in Subjects with Angiographically Documented Coronary Heart Disease (CHD) to Examine the Effects of the Novel Lipoprotein-associated Phospholipase A2 (Lp-PLA2) inhibitor SB-480848 on Intermediate Cardiovascular Endpoints, Patient Safety and Tolerability.
Interventions
SB-480848 is available as enteric-coated, free-base micronized tablet
Placebo is available as enteric-coated, free-base micronized tablet
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Successful PCI (Percutaneous Coronary Intervention) or uncomplicated diagnostic catheterization * Suitable non-intervened coronary artery with IVUS * Antiplatelet therapy
Exclusion criteria
* Clinical instability * Previous CABG (Coronary Artery By-pass Graft) surgery * Planned major surgery * Recent stroke * Abnormal QTc * Renal or hepatic impairment * Uncontrolled hypertension * Use of corticosteroids * Class III or IV heart failure * Asthma
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Mean Circulating High Sensitivity C- Reactive Protein (Hs-CRP) Levels at Week 52. | Week 52 | hs-CRP is a pentameric protein that is rapidly upregulated in response to inflammation and tissue damage and assessed as circulating biomarkers associated with atherosclerosis and cardiovascular risk. Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) data was reported. Only data from 3 months onwards was carried forward. hs-CRP has a skewed distribution and values were log transformed before analysis. The statistics was calculated on the log transformed data and back transformed. The adjusted geometric means of hs-CRP levels at Week 52 were reported. The levels were analyzed using analysis of co-variance (ANCOVA), with Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) status, pooled country and treatment included as covariates. |
| Change From Baseline in the Density of Rotterdam Classification (ROC) Grade III/IV Strain Spots/10 Millimeter (mm) Within the Region of Interest (ROI) on IVUS Grey Scale Based Palpography at the End of Week 52. | Baseline and Week 52 | The ROC grade III/IV strain spots per 10 millimetre (mm) within the ROI on intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) grey scale based palpography were assessed and change from Baseline at end of 52 was reported. Change from Baseline was calculated as the density of spots at the end of study minus the density of spots recorded at Baseline. If either value was considered missing then the change from Baseline value was missing for the participant. Between treatment group comparisons of change from Baseline were analyzed using ANCOVA adjusting for ACS status, pooled country, Baseline value, matched segment length and treatment. Adjusted means and associated standard errors for each treatment group were presented. The baseline value for each participant was defined as the last value prior to the first dose of study drug. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change From Baseline in Plaque Volume as IVUS-Grey Scale Assessments at Week 52 | Baseline and Week 52 | Change from Baseline was calculated for each IVUS grey scale assessment recorded at the end of study. The Baseline value for each participant was defined as the last value prior to the first dose of study drug. Change from Baseline was calculated as plaque volume at Week 52 minus Baseline value. The data was analyzed using ANCOVA, with ACS status, pooled country, Baseline value, matched segment length and treatment included as covariates. |
| Change From Baseline in Percent Obstruction Volume as IVUS-Grey Scale Assessments at Week 52 | Baseline and Week 52 | Change from Baseline in percent obstruction volume was calculated for each IVUS grey scale assessment recorded. Percent obstruction volume was calculated as (Plaque volume/ Vessel volume \*100). The Baseline value for each participant was defined as the last value prior to the first dose of study drug. Change from Baseline was calculated as plaque volume at Week 52 minus Baseline value. The data was analyzed using ANCOVA, with ACS status, pooled country, baseline value, matched segment length and treatment included as covariates. |
| Change From Baseline in Necrotic Core Volume as Intravenous Ultrasound-Virtual Histology (IVUS-VH) Assessments at Week 52 | Baseline and Week 52 | Change from Baseline was calculated for each IVUS-VH assessment recorded at the end of study. The necrotic core volume was calculated as mean necrotic area multiplied by mean of Baseline and follow-up length. Change from Baseline was calculated as plaque volume at Week 52 minus Baseline value. The data was analyzed using ANCOVA, with ACS status, pooled country, Baseline value, matched segment length and treatment included as covariates. The Baseline value for each participant was defined as the last value prior to the first dose of study drug. Change from Baseline in necrotic core volume as IVUS-VH assessments at Week 52 was reported. |
| Change From Baseline in Necrotic Core as a Percent of IVUS-VH Plaque at the End of Week 52. | Baseline and Week 52 | Change from baseline was calculated for each IVUS-VH assessment recorded at the end of study. The baseline value for each participant was defined as the last value prior to the first dose of study drug. Change from baseline in percent necrotic core was calculated as percent necrotic core at Week 52 minus baseline value. The data was analyzed using ANCOVA, with ACS status, pooled country, baseline value, matched segment length and treatment included as covariates. Change from Baseline in necrotic core as a percent of IVUS-VH plaque at the end of week 52 was reported. |
| Mean Interlukin 6 (IL-6) Levels as Circulating Biomarkers Associated With Inflammatory Burden at Week 26 and Week 52 | Week 26 and Week 52 | Blood was collected at baseline, Week 4, 13, 26 and 52 for evaluation of biomarkers. Mean IL-6 levels as circulating biomarkers associated with inflammatory burden at Week 26 and Week 52 were assessed and reported. LOCF data was reported. Only data from 3 months onwards was carried forward. IL-6 had a skewed distribution and values were log transformed before analysis. The statistics was calculated on the log transformed data and back transformed. The adjusted geometric means of IL-6 levels at Week 26 and 52 were reported. The levels were analyzed using ANCOVA, with ACS status, pooled country and treatment included as covariates. |
| Mean Intercellular Adhesion Molecule-1 (ICAM-1) Levels as Circulating Biomarkers Associated With Inflammatory Burden at Week 26 and Week 52 | Week 26 and Week 52 | Blood was collected at baseline, Week 4, 13, 26 and 52 for evaluation of biomarkers. Mean ICAM-1 levels as circulating biomarkers associated with inflammatory burden at Week 26 and Week 52 were assessed and reported. LOCF data was reported. Only data from 3 months onwards was carried forward. ICAM-1 had a skewed distribution and values were log transformed before analysis. The statistics was calculated on the log transformed data and back transformed. The adjusted geometric means of ICAM-1 levels at Week 26 and 52 were reported. The levels were analyzed using ANCOVA, with ACS status, pooled country and treatment included as covariates. |
| Mean Myeloperoxidase (MPO) Levels as Circulating Biomarkers Associated With Inflammatory Burden at Week 26 and Week 52 | Week 26 and Week 52 | Blood was collected at baseline, Week 4, 13, 26 and 52 for evaluation of biomarkers. Mean MPO levels as circulating biomarkers associated with inflammatory burden at Week 26 and Week 52 were assessed and reported. LOCF data was reported. Only data from 3 months onwards was carried forward. MPO had a skewed distribution and values were log transformed before analysis. The statistics was calculated on the log transformed data and back transformed. The adjusted geometric means of MPO levels at Week 26 and 52 were reported. The levels were analyzed using ANCOVA, with ACS status, pooled country and treatment included as covariates. |
| Circulating Hs-CRP at the End of Week 26. | Week 26 | hs-CRP is a pentameric protein that is rapidly upregulated in response to inflammation and tissue damage and assessed as circulating biomarkers associated with atherosclerosis and cardiovascular risk. LOCF data was reported. Only data from 3 months onwards was carried forward. hs-CRP has a skewed distribution and values were log transformed before analysis. The statistics was calculated on the log transformed data and back transformed. The adjusted geometric means of hs-CRP levels at Week 26 were reported. The levels were analyzed using ANCOVA, with ACS status, pooled country and treatment included as covariates. |
| Mean Matrix Metaloproteinases-9 (MMP-9) Levels as Circulating Biomarkers Associated With Plaque Instability at Week 26 and Week 52. | Week 26 and Week 52 | Blood was collected at baseline, Week 4, 13, 26 and 52 for evaluation of biomarkers. Mean MMP-9 levels as circulating biomarkers associated with plaque instability at Week 26 and Week 52 were assessed and reported. LOCF data was reported. Only data from 3 months onwards was carried forward MMP-9 had a skewed distribution and values were log transformed before analysis. The statistics was calculated on the log transformed data and back transformed. The adjusted geometric means of MMP-9 levels at Week 26 and 52 were reported. The levels were analyzed using ANCOVA, with ACS status, pooled country and treatment included as covariates. |
| Mean Levels of Oxidised Phospholipids/ Apolipoprotein B100 (oxPL/apoB) Ratio as Target Circulating Biomarkers at the End of Week 26 and Week 52. | Week 26 and Week 52 | Blood was collected at baseline, Week 4, 13, 26 and 52 for evaluation of biomarkers. Mean OXPL/LAPO B levels as circulating biomarkers associated with Lp-PLA2 target-related biomarkers at Week 26 and Week 52 were assessed and reported. LOCF data was reported. Only data from 3 months onwards was carried forward. OXPL/LAPO B had a skewed distribution and values were log transformed before analysis. The statistics was calculated on the log transformed data and back transformed. The adjusted geometric means of OXPL/LAPO B levels at Week 26 and 52 were reported. The levels were analyzed using ANCOVA, with ACS status, pooled country and treatment included as covariates. |
| Mean Levels of Oxidized Non-esterified Fatty Acids (Ox-NEFA) as Target Circulating Biomarkers at the End of Week 26 and Week 52 | Week 26 and Week 52 | Mean ox-NEFA levels as circulating biomarkers associated with Lp-PLA2 target-related biomarkers at Week 26 and Week 52 was planned to be assessed. However, the parameter data were not collected for this endpoint. |
| Change From Baseline in Vessel Volume and Lumen Volume as IVUS-Grey Scale Assessments at Week 52. | Baseline and Week 52 | Change from baseline in vessel volume and lumen volume calculated for each IVUS grey scale assessment recorded. Vessel volume (i.e., coronary remodelling) defined by the leading edge of echogenic adventitia/external elastic membrane (EEM) and calculated as, mean vessel area multiplied mean of vessel length at Baseline and Follow-up. Lumen volume was circumscribed by the leading edge of intima/plaque and calculated as mean lumen area multiplied by mean lumen length at Baseline and Follow-up. The baseline value for each participant was defined as the last value prior to the first dose of study drug. Change from baseline was calculated as vessel volume or lumen volume at Week 52 minus baseline value. |
| Change From Baseline in Mean Plaque Area, Mean Vessel Area, and Mean Lumen Area as IVUS-Grey Scale Assessments at Week 52. | Baseline and Week 52 | Change from baseline in was mean plaque area, mean vessel area, and mean lumen area were derived from IVUS system at each IVUS grey scale assessment recorded. The baseline value for each participant was defined as the last value prior to the first dose of study drug. Change from baseline was calculated as mean area of the parameter (plaque/vessel/lumen) at Week 52 minus baseline value. The data was reported based on observed cases. Data analyzed using ANCOVA, with ACS status, pooled country, baseline value, matched segment length and treatment included as covariates. |
| Change From Baseline in Fibrous Tissue Volume and Fibro-fatty Volume as IVUS-VH Assessments at Week 52 | Baseline and Week 52 | Change from baseline in fibrous tissue volume and fibro-fatty volume were derived from IVUS system at each IVUS grey scale assessment recorded. Fibrous tissue volume was calculated as mean fibro-fatty area multiplied by mean of Baseline and Follow-up length. Fibro-fatty volume was calculated as mean fibrous area multiplied by mean of Baseline and Follow-up length. The baseline value for each participant was defined as the last value prior to the first dose of study drug. Change from baseline was calculated as mean Fibrous tissue volume or Fibro-fatty volume at Week 52 minus baseline value. The data was reported based on observed cases. Data analyzed using ANCOVA, with ACS status, pooled country, baseline value , matched segment length and treatment included as covariates. |
| Change From Baseline in Fibrous Tissue and Fibro-fatty as a Percent of IVUS-VH Plaque as IVUS-VH Assessments at Week 52 | Baseline and Week 52 | Fibro-fatty as percentage of VH plaque and Fibrous tissue as percentage of VH plaque were derived from IVUS-VH system. The baseline value for each participant was defined as the last value prior to the first dose of study drug. Change from baseline was calculated as Fibro-fatty as percentage of VH plaque or Fibrous tissue as percentage of VH plaque at Week 52 minus baseline value. The data was reported based on observed cases. Data analyzed using ANCOVA, with ACS status, pooled country, baseline value , matched segment length and treatment included as covariates. |
| Mean sCD40L Levels as Circulating Biomarkers Associated With Inflammatory Burden at Week 26 and Week 52 | Week 26 and Week 52 | Blood was collected at baseline, Week 4, 13, 26 and 52 for evaluation of biomarkers. Mean sCD40L levels as circulating biomarker associated with inflammatory burden at Week 26 and Week 52 were assessed and reported. sCD40L had a skewed distribution and values were log transformed before analysis. The statistics was calculated on the log transformed data and back transformed. The adjusted geometric means of sCD40L levels at Week 26 and 52 were reported. The levels were analyzed using ANCOVA, with ACS status, pooled country and treatment included as covariates. |
| Mean Lipoprotein Phospholipase A2 (Lp-PLA2) Activity at the End of Week 26 and Week 52 | Week 26 and Week 52 | Lp-PLA2 is a calcium-independent phospholipase A2 enzyme associated with low density lipoprotein (LDL) in plasma. Blood samples were collected at baseline and at Week 4, 13, 26, and 52 and Lp-PLA2 activity was determined. Percentage inhibition of Lp-PLA2 activity relative to baseline was calculated as, percent inhibition = (\[baseline value - post baseline value\] x 100) / baseline value. The baseline value for each participant was defined as the last value prior to the first dose of study drug. |
Countries
Austria, Belgium, Czechia, Denmark, France, Germany, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Spain, Switzerland
Participant flow
Recruitment details
The study was conducted in participants with angiographically documented coronary artery disease (CHD) at 23 sites in 10 countries. The study was initiated on 10 November 2005 and completed on 28 August 2007.
Pre-assignment details
There were 451 participants screened for enrollment of whom 121 failed screening. A total of 330 participants were randomized to receive treatment. Among the randomized participants, 4 from placebo arm and 3 from darapladib arm did not receive study drug. The remaining 323 participants received at least one dose of study drug.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Placebo Eligible participants received the matching placebo for 52 weeks. Participants were instructed to administer one tablet (swallowed intact and not chewed) in the morning each day with food. | 151 |
| Darapladib 160 mg EC Tablet Eligible participants received darapladib 160 mg EC tablet once daily for 52 weeks. Participants were instructed to administer one tablet (swallowed intact and not chewed) in the morning each day with food. | 172 |
| Total | 323 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Adverse Event | 11 | 7 |
| Overall Study | Lost to Follow-up | 3 | 1 |
| Overall Study | Non-compliance | 1 | 0 |
| Overall Study | Other | 1 | 1 |
| Overall Study | Withdrawal by Subject | 5 | 11 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Darapladib 160 mg EC Tablet | Total | Placebo |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 59.4 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.81 | 58.4 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.36 | 57.3 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.86 |
| Race (NIH/OMB) American Indian or Alaska Native | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Asian | 1 Participants | 3 Participants | 2 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Black or African American | 0 Participants | 3 Participants | 3 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) More than one race | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) White | 171 Participants | 317 Participants | 146 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 32 Participants | 57 Participants | 25 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 140 Participants | 266 Participants | 126 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 0 / 151 | 0 / 172 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 37 / 151 | 59 / 172 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 45 / 151 | 46 / 172 |
Outcome results
Change From Baseline in the Density of Rotterdam Classification (ROC) Grade III/IV Strain Spots/10 Millimeter (mm) Within the Region of Interest (ROI) on IVUS Grey Scale Based Palpography at the End of Week 52.
The ROC grade III/IV strain spots per 10 millimetre (mm) within the ROI on intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) grey scale based palpography were assessed and change from Baseline at end of 52 was reported. Change from Baseline was calculated as the density of spots at the end of study minus the density of spots recorded at Baseline. If either value was considered missing then the change from Baseline value was missing for the participant. Between treatment group comparisons of change from Baseline were analyzed using ANCOVA adjusting for ACS status, pooled country, Baseline value, matched segment length and treatment. Adjusted means and associated standard errors for each treatment group were presented. The baseline value for each participant was defined as the last value prior to the first dose of study drug.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 52
Population: The imaging evaluable population was comprised of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug, with an evaluable baseline and end of treatment imaging assessment at 6 months (Day 154) or later. The participants available at the time of assessment were included in the analysis.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in the Density of Rotterdam Classification (ROC) Grade III/IV Strain Spots/10 Millimeter (mm) Within the Region of Interest (ROI) on IVUS Grey Scale Based Palpography at the End of Week 52. | 0.003 Spots/10 mm | Standard Error 0.048 |
| Darapladib 160 mg EC Tablet | Change From Baseline in the Density of Rotterdam Classification (ROC) Grade III/IV Strain Spots/10 Millimeter (mm) Within the Region of Interest (ROI) on IVUS Grey Scale Based Palpography at the End of Week 52. | -0.079 Spots/10 mm | Standard Error 0.045 |
Mean Circulating High Sensitivity C- Reactive Protein (Hs-CRP) Levels at Week 52.
hs-CRP is a pentameric protein that is rapidly upregulated in response to inflammation and tissue damage and assessed as circulating biomarkers associated with atherosclerosis and cardiovascular risk. Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) data was reported. Only data from 3 months onwards was carried forward. hs-CRP has a skewed distribution and values were log transformed before analysis. The statistics was calculated on the log transformed data and back transformed. The adjusted geometric means of hs-CRP levels at Week 52 were reported. The levels were analyzed using analysis of co-variance (ANCOVA), with Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) status, pooled country and treatment included as covariates.
Time frame: Week 52
Population: The biomarker evaluable population was comprised of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug, with an evaluable biomarker assessment at 3 months (Day 77) or later.
| Arm | Measure | Value (GEOMETRIC_MEAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Mean Circulating High Sensitivity C- Reactive Protein (Hs-CRP) Levels at Week 52. | 1.034 mg per litre (mg/L) |
| Darapladib 160 mg EC Tablet | Mean Circulating High Sensitivity C- Reactive Protein (Hs-CRP) Levels at Week 52. | 0.913 mg per litre (mg/L) |
Change From Baseline in Fibrous Tissue and Fibro-fatty as a Percent of IVUS-VH Plaque as IVUS-VH Assessments at Week 52
Fibro-fatty as percentage of VH plaque and Fibrous tissue as percentage of VH plaque were derived from IVUS-VH system. The baseline value for each participant was defined as the last value prior to the first dose of study drug. Change from baseline was calculated as Fibro-fatty as percentage of VH plaque or Fibrous tissue as percentage of VH plaque at Week 52 minus baseline value. The data was reported based on observed cases. Data analyzed using ANCOVA, with ACS status, pooled country, baseline value , matched segment length and treatment included as covariates.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 52
Population: Imaging evaluable population
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Fibrous Tissue and Fibro-fatty as a Percent of IVUS-VH Plaque as IVUS-VH Assessments at Week 52 | Fibrous tissue as percentage of VH plaque | -4.007 Percentage of VH | Standard Error 0.631 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Fibrous Tissue and Fibro-fatty as a Percent of IVUS-VH Plaque as IVUS-VH Assessments at Week 52 | Fibro-fatty as percentage of VH plaque | -0.782 Percentage of VH | Standard Error 0.881 |
| Darapladib 160 mg EC Tablet | Change From Baseline in Fibrous Tissue and Fibro-fatty as a Percent of IVUS-VH Plaque as IVUS-VH Assessments at Week 52 | Fibrous tissue as percentage of VH plaque | -2.007 Percentage of VH | Standard Error 0.582 |
| Darapladib 160 mg EC Tablet | Change From Baseline in Fibrous Tissue and Fibro-fatty as a Percent of IVUS-VH Plaque as IVUS-VH Assessments at Week 52 | Fibro-fatty as percentage of VH plaque | -0.043 Percentage of VH | Standard Error 0.813 |
Change From Baseline in Fibrous Tissue Volume and Fibro-fatty Volume as IVUS-VH Assessments at Week 52
Change from baseline in fibrous tissue volume and fibro-fatty volume were derived from IVUS system at each IVUS grey scale assessment recorded. Fibrous tissue volume was calculated as mean fibro-fatty area multiplied by mean of Baseline and Follow-up length. Fibro-fatty volume was calculated as mean fibrous area multiplied by mean of Baseline and Follow-up length. The baseline value for each participant was defined as the last value prior to the first dose of study drug. Change from baseline was calculated as mean Fibrous tissue volume or Fibro-fatty volume at Week 52 minus baseline value. The data was reported based on observed cases. Data analyzed using ANCOVA, with ACS status, pooled country, baseline value , matched segment length and treatment included as covariates.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 52
Population: Imaging evaluable population
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Fibrous Tissue Volume and Fibro-fatty Volume as IVUS-VH Assessments at Week 52 | Fibrous tissue volume | -6.985 mm^3 | Standard Error 2.312 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Fibrous Tissue Volume and Fibro-fatty Volume as IVUS-VH Assessments at Week 52 | Fibro-fatty volume | -3.342 mm^3 | Standard Error 1.734 |
| Darapladib 160 mg EC Tablet | Change From Baseline in Fibrous Tissue Volume and Fibro-fatty Volume as IVUS-VH Assessments at Week 52 | Fibro-fatty volume | -1.415 mm^3 | Standard Error 1.6 |
| Darapladib 160 mg EC Tablet | Change From Baseline in Fibrous Tissue Volume and Fibro-fatty Volume as IVUS-VH Assessments at Week 52 | Fibrous tissue volume | -7.569 mm^3 | Standard Error 2.133 |
Change From Baseline in Mean Plaque Area, Mean Vessel Area, and Mean Lumen Area as IVUS-Grey Scale Assessments at Week 52.
Change from baseline in was mean plaque area, mean vessel area, and mean lumen area were derived from IVUS system at each IVUS grey scale assessment recorded. The baseline value for each participant was defined as the last value prior to the first dose of study drug. Change from baseline was calculated as mean area of the parameter (plaque/vessel/lumen) at Week 52 minus baseline value. The data was reported based on observed cases. Data analyzed using ANCOVA, with ACS status, pooled country, baseline value, matched segment length and treatment included as covariates.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 52
Population: Imaging evaluable population
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Mean Plaque Area, Mean Vessel Area, and Mean Lumen Area as IVUS-Grey Scale Assessments at Week 52. | Mean plaque area | -0.112 mm2 | Standard Error 0.056 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Mean Plaque Area, Mean Vessel Area, and Mean Lumen Area as IVUS-Grey Scale Assessments at Week 52. | Mean vessel area | -0.242 mm2 | Standard Error 0.115 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Mean Plaque Area, Mean Vessel Area, and Mean Lumen Area as IVUS-Grey Scale Assessments at Week 52. | Mean lumen area | -0.130 mm2 | Standard Error 0.112 |
| Darapladib 160 mg EC Tablet | Change From Baseline in Mean Plaque Area, Mean Vessel Area, and Mean Lumen Area as IVUS-Grey Scale Assessments at Week 52. | Mean plaque area | -0.124 mm2 | Standard Error 0.05 |
| Darapladib 160 mg EC Tablet | Change From Baseline in Mean Plaque Area, Mean Vessel Area, and Mean Lumen Area as IVUS-Grey Scale Assessments at Week 52. | Mean vessel area | -0.194 mm2 | Standard Error 0.104 |
| Darapladib 160 mg EC Tablet | Change From Baseline in Mean Plaque Area, Mean Vessel Area, and Mean Lumen Area as IVUS-Grey Scale Assessments at Week 52. | Mean lumen area | -0.069 mm2 | Standard Error 0.101 |
Change From Baseline in Necrotic Core as a Percent of IVUS-VH Plaque at the End of Week 52.
Change from baseline was calculated for each IVUS-VH assessment recorded at the end of study. The baseline value for each participant was defined as the last value prior to the first dose of study drug. Change from baseline in percent necrotic core was calculated as percent necrotic core at Week 52 minus baseline value. The data was analyzed using ANCOVA, with ACS status, pooled country, baseline value, matched segment length and treatment included as covariates. Change from Baseline in necrotic core as a percent of IVUS-VH plaque at the end of week 52 was reported.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 52
Population: Imaging evaluable population
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Necrotic Core as a Percent of IVUS-VH Plaque at the End of Week 52. | 2.502 Percent Necrotic core | Standard Error 0.722 |
| Darapladib 160 mg EC Tablet | Change From Baseline in Necrotic Core as a Percent of IVUS-VH Plaque at the End of Week 52. | 0.535 Percent Necrotic core | Standard Error 0.666 |
Change From Baseline in Necrotic Core Volume as Intravenous Ultrasound-Virtual Histology (IVUS-VH) Assessments at Week 52
Change from Baseline was calculated for each IVUS-VH assessment recorded at the end of study. The necrotic core volume was calculated as mean necrotic area multiplied by mean of Baseline and follow-up length. Change from Baseline was calculated as plaque volume at Week 52 minus Baseline value. The data was analyzed using ANCOVA, with ACS status, pooled country, Baseline value, matched segment length and treatment included as covariates. The Baseline value for each participant was defined as the last value prior to the first dose of study drug. Change from Baseline in necrotic core volume as IVUS-VH assessments at Week 52 was reported.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 52
Population: Imaging evaluable population. Only those participants with data available at the indicated time points were analyzed.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Necrotic Core Volume as Intravenous Ultrasound-Virtual Histology (IVUS-VH) Assessments at Week 52 | 4.633 mm^3 | Standard Error 1.491 |
| Darapladib 160 mg EC Tablet | Change From Baseline in Necrotic Core Volume as Intravenous Ultrasound-Virtual Histology (IVUS-VH) Assessments at Week 52 | -0.531 mm^3 | Standard Error 1.376 |
Change From Baseline in Percent Obstruction Volume as IVUS-Grey Scale Assessments at Week 52
Change from Baseline in percent obstruction volume was calculated for each IVUS grey scale assessment recorded. Percent obstruction volume was calculated as (Plaque volume/ Vessel volume \*100). The Baseline value for each participant was defined as the last value prior to the first dose of study drug. Change from Baseline was calculated as plaque volume at Week 52 minus Baseline value. The data was analyzed using ANCOVA, with ACS status, pooled country, baseline value, matched segment length and treatment included as covariates.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 52
Population: Imaging evaluable population
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Percent Obstruction Volume as IVUS-Grey Scale Assessments at Week 52 | 0.007 Percentage of mm^3 | Standard Error 0.354 |
| Darapladib 160 mg EC Tablet | Change From Baseline in Percent Obstruction Volume as IVUS-Grey Scale Assessments at Week 52 | -0.054 Percentage of mm^3 | Standard Error 0.321 |
Change From Baseline in Plaque Volume as IVUS-Grey Scale Assessments at Week 52
Change from Baseline was calculated for each IVUS grey scale assessment recorded at the end of study. The Baseline value for each participant was defined as the last value prior to the first dose of study drug. Change from Baseline was calculated as plaque volume at Week 52 minus Baseline value. The data was analyzed using ANCOVA, with ACS status, pooled country, Baseline value, matched segment length and treatment included as covariates.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 52
Population: Imaging evaluable population
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Plaque Volume as IVUS-Grey Scale Assessments at Week 52 | -5.126 Cubic millimetre (mm^3) | Standard Error 2.715 |
| Darapladib 160 mg EC Tablet | Change From Baseline in Plaque Volume as IVUS-Grey Scale Assessments at Week 52 | -4.873 Cubic millimetre (mm^3) | Standard Error 2.464 |
Change From Baseline in Vessel Volume and Lumen Volume as IVUS-Grey Scale Assessments at Week 52.
Change from baseline in vessel volume and lumen volume calculated for each IVUS grey scale assessment recorded. Vessel volume (i.e., coronary remodelling) defined by the leading edge of echogenic adventitia/external elastic membrane (EEM) and calculated as, mean vessel area multiplied mean of vessel length at Baseline and Follow-up. Lumen volume was circumscribed by the leading edge of intima/plaque and calculated as mean lumen area multiplied by mean lumen length at Baseline and Follow-up. The baseline value for each participant was defined as the last value prior to the first dose of study drug. Change from baseline was calculated as vessel volume or lumen volume at Week 52 minus baseline value.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 52
Population: Imaging evaluable population
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Vessel Volume and Lumen Volume as IVUS-Grey Scale Assessments at Week 52. | Vessel volume | -11.211 mm^3 | Standard Error 5.4 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Vessel Volume and Lumen Volume as IVUS-Grey Scale Assessments at Week 52. | Lumen volume | -6.693 mm^3 | Standard Error 5.16 |
| Darapladib 160 mg EC Tablet | Change From Baseline in Vessel Volume and Lumen Volume as IVUS-Grey Scale Assessments at Week 52. | Vessel volume | -9.453 mm^3 | Standard Error 4.901 |
| Darapladib 160 mg EC Tablet | Change From Baseline in Vessel Volume and Lumen Volume as IVUS-Grey Scale Assessments at Week 52. | Lumen volume | -4.066 mm^3 | Standard Error 4.682 |
Circulating Hs-CRP at the End of Week 26.
hs-CRP is a pentameric protein that is rapidly upregulated in response to inflammation and tissue damage and assessed as circulating biomarkers associated with atherosclerosis and cardiovascular risk. LOCF data was reported. Only data from 3 months onwards was carried forward. hs-CRP has a skewed distribution and values were log transformed before analysis. The statistics was calculated on the log transformed data and back transformed. The adjusted geometric means of hs-CRP levels at Week 26 were reported. The levels were analyzed using ANCOVA, with ACS status, pooled country and treatment included as covariates.
Time frame: Week 26
Population: Biomarker evaluable population
| Arm | Measure | Value (GEOMETRIC_MEAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Circulating Hs-CRP at the End of Week 26. | 0.924 mg/L |
| Darapladib 160 mg EC Tablet | Circulating Hs-CRP at the End of Week 26. | 0.960 mg/L |
Mean Intercellular Adhesion Molecule-1 (ICAM-1) Levels as Circulating Biomarkers Associated With Inflammatory Burden at Week 26 and Week 52
Blood was collected at baseline, Week 4, 13, 26 and 52 for evaluation of biomarkers. Mean ICAM-1 levels as circulating biomarkers associated with inflammatory burden at Week 26 and Week 52 were assessed and reported. LOCF data was reported. Only data from 3 months onwards was carried forward. ICAM-1 had a skewed distribution and values were log transformed before analysis. The statistics was calculated on the log transformed data and back transformed. The adjusted geometric means of ICAM-1 levels at Week 26 and 52 were reported. The levels were analyzed using ANCOVA, with ACS status, pooled country and treatment included as covariates.
Time frame: Week 26 and Week 52
Population: Biomarker evaluable population.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (GEOMETRIC_MEAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Mean Intercellular Adhesion Molecule-1 (ICAM-1) Levels as Circulating Biomarkers Associated With Inflammatory Burden at Week 26 and Week 52 | Week 26 (LOCF) | 269.444 nanogram per millilitre (ng/mL) |
| Placebo | Mean Intercellular Adhesion Molecule-1 (ICAM-1) Levels as Circulating Biomarkers Associated With Inflammatory Burden at Week 26 and Week 52 | Week 52 (LOCF) | 277.947 nanogram per millilitre (ng/mL) |
| Darapladib 160 mg EC Tablet | Mean Intercellular Adhesion Molecule-1 (ICAM-1) Levels as Circulating Biomarkers Associated With Inflammatory Burden at Week 26 and Week 52 | Week 26 (LOCF) | 266.447 nanogram per millilitre (ng/mL) |
| Darapladib 160 mg EC Tablet | Mean Intercellular Adhesion Molecule-1 (ICAM-1) Levels as Circulating Biomarkers Associated With Inflammatory Burden at Week 26 and Week 52 | Week 52 (LOCF) | 268.950 nanogram per millilitre (ng/mL) |
Mean Interlukin 6 (IL-6) Levels as Circulating Biomarkers Associated With Inflammatory Burden at Week 26 and Week 52
Blood was collected at baseline, Week 4, 13, 26 and 52 for evaluation of biomarkers. Mean IL-6 levels as circulating biomarkers associated with inflammatory burden at Week 26 and Week 52 were assessed and reported. LOCF data was reported. Only data from 3 months onwards was carried forward. IL-6 had a skewed distribution and values were log transformed before analysis. The statistics was calculated on the log transformed data and back transformed. The adjusted geometric means of IL-6 levels at Week 26 and 52 were reported. The levels were analyzed using ANCOVA, with ACS status, pooled country and treatment included as covariates.
Time frame: Week 26 and Week 52
Population: Biomarker evaluable population
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (GEOMETRIC_MEAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Mean Interlukin 6 (IL-6) Levels as Circulating Biomarkers Associated With Inflammatory Burden at Week 26 and Week 52 | Week 26 LOCF | 1.851 Nanograms per litre (ng/L) |
| Placebo | Mean Interlukin 6 (IL-6) Levels as Circulating Biomarkers Associated With Inflammatory Burden at Week 26 and Week 52 | Week 52 LOCF | 2.019 Nanograms per litre (ng/L) |
| Darapladib 160 mg EC Tablet | Mean Interlukin 6 (IL-6) Levels as Circulating Biomarkers Associated With Inflammatory Burden at Week 26 and Week 52 | Week 26 LOCF | 1.979 Nanograms per litre (ng/L) |
| Darapladib 160 mg EC Tablet | Mean Interlukin 6 (IL-6) Levels as Circulating Biomarkers Associated With Inflammatory Burden at Week 26 and Week 52 | Week 52 LOCF | 2.267 Nanograms per litre (ng/L) |
Mean Levels of Oxidised Phospholipids/ Apolipoprotein B100 (oxPL/apoB) Ratio as Target Circulating Biomarkers at the End of Week 26 and Week 52.
Blood was collected at baseline, Week 4, 13, 26 and 52 for evaluation of biomarkers. Mean OXPL/LAPO B levels as circulating biomarkers associated with Lp-PLA2 target-related biomarkers at Week 26 and Week 52 were assessed and reported. LOCF data was reported. Only data from 3 months onwards was carried forward. OXPL/LAPO B had a skewed distribution and values were log transformed before analysis. The statistics was calculated on the log transformed data and back transformed. The adjusted geometric means of OXPL/LAPO B levels at Week 26 and 52 were reported. The levels were analyzed using ANCOVA, with ACS status, pooled country and treatment included as covariates.
Time frame: Week 26 and Week 52
Population: Biomarker evaluable population.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (GEOMETRIC_MEAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Mean Levels of Oxidised Phospholipids/ Apolipoprotein B100 (oxPL/apoB) Ratio as Target Circulating Biomarkers at the End of Week 26 and Week 52. | Week 26 LOCF | 3114.718 Relative light units (RLU) |
| Placebo | Mean Levels of Oxidised Phospholipids/ Apolipoprotein B100 (oxPL/apoB) Ratio as Target Circulating Biomarkers at the End of Week 26 and Week 52. | Week 52 LOCF | 2711.118 Relative light units (RLU) |
| Darapladib 160 mg EC Tablet | Mean Levels of Oxidised Phospholipids/ Apolipoprotein B100 (oxPL/apoB) Ratio as Target Circulating Biomarkers at the End of Week 26 and Week 52. | Week 26 LOCF | 3106.872 Relative light units (RLU) |
| Darapladib 160 mg EC Tablet | Mean Levels of Oxidised Phospholipids/ Apolipoprotein B100 (oxPL/apoB) Ratio as Target Circulating Biomarkers at the End of Week 26 and Week 52. | Week 52 LOCF | 2478.376 Relative light units (RLU) |
Mean Levels of Oxidized Non-esterified Fatty Acids (Ox-NEFA) as Target Circulating Biomarkers at the End of Week 26 and Week 52
Mean ox-NEFA levels as circulating biomarkers associated with Lp-PLA2 target-related biomarkers at Week 26 and Week 52 was planned to be assessed. However, the parameter data were not collected for this endpoint.
Time frame: Week 26 and Week 52
Population: Biomarker evaluable population
Mean Lipoprotein Phospholipase A2 (Lp-PLA2) Activity at the End of Week 26 and Week 52
Lp-PLA2 is a calcium-independent phospholipase A2 enzyme associated with low density lipoprotein (LDL) in plasma. Blood samples were collected at baseline and at Week 4, 13, 26, and 52 and Lp-PLA2 activity was determined. Percentage inhibition of Lp-PLA2 activity relative to baseline was calculated as, percent inhibition = (\[baseline value - post baseline value\] x 100) / baseline value. The baseline value for each participant was defined as the last value prior to the first dose of study drug.
Time frame: Week 26 and Week 52
Population: The biomarker evaluable population was comprised of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug, with an evaluable biomarker assessment at 3 months (Day 77) or later.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (GEOMETRIC_MEAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Mean Lipoprotein Phospholipase A2 (Lp-PLA2) Activity at the End of Week 26 and Week 52 | Week 26 LOCF | 151.412 micromole per minute per Litre |
| Placebo | Mean Lipoprotein Phospholipase A2 (Lp-PLA2) Activity at the End of Week 26 and Week 52 | Week 52 LOCF | 152.061 micromole per minute per Litre |
| Darapladib 160 mg EC Tablet | Mean Lipoprotein Phospholipase A2 (Lp-PLA2) Activity at the End of Week 26 and Week 52 | Week 52 LOCF | 61.850 micromole per minute per Litre |
| Darapladib 160 mg EC Tablet | Mean Lipoprotein Phospholipase A2 (Lp-PLA2) Activity at the End of Week 26 and Week 52 | Week 26 LOCF | 59.449 micromole per minute per Litre |
Mean Matrix Metaloproteinases-9 (MMP-9) Levels as Circulating Biomarkers Associated With Plaque Instability at Week 26 and Week 52.
Blood was collected at baseline, Week 4, 13, 26 and 52 for evaluation of biomarkers. Mean MMP-9 levels as circulating biomarkers associated with plaque instability at Week 26 and Week 52 were assessed and reported. LOCF data was reported. Only data from 3 months onwards was carried forward MMP-9 had a skewed distribution and values were log transformed before analysis. The statistics was calculated on the log transformed data and back transformed. The adjusted geometric means of MMP-9 levels at Week 26 and 52 were reported. The levels were analyzed using ANCOVA, with ACS status, pooled country and treatment included as covariates.
Time frame: Week 26 and Week 52
Population: Biomarker evaluable population
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (GEOMETRIC_MEAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Mean Matrix Metaloproteinases-9 (MMP-9) Levels as Circulating Biomarkers Associated With Plaque Instability at Week 26 and Week 52. | Week 26 LOCF | 481.581 microgram per litre (mcg/L) |
| Placebo | Mean Matrix Metaloproteinases-9 (MMP-9) Levels as Circulating Biomarkers Associated With Plaque Instability at Week 26 and Week 52. | Week 52 LOCF | 488.998 microgram per litre (mcg/L) |
| Darapladib 160 mg EC Tablet | Mean Matrix Metaloproteinases-9 (MMP-9) Levels as Circulating Biomarkers Associated With Plaque Instability at Week 26 and Week 52. | Week 26 LOCF | 471.477 microgram per litre (mcg/L) |
| Darapladib 160 mg EC Tablet | Mean Matrix Metaloproteinases-9 (MMP-9) Levels as Circulating Biomarkers Associated With Plaque Instability at Week 26 and Week 52. | Week 52 LOCF | 498.709 microgram per litre (mcg/L) |
Mean Myeloperoxidase (MPO) Levels as Circulating Biomarkers Associated With Inflammatory Burden at Week 26 and Week 52
Blood was collected at baseline, Week 4, 13, 26 and 52 for evaluation of biomarkers. Mean MPO levels as circulating biomarkers associated with inflammatory burden at Week 26 and Week 52 were assessed and reported. LOCF data was reported. Only data from 3 months onwards was carried forward. MPO had a skewed distribution and values were log transformed before analysis. The statistics was calculated on the log transformed data and back transformed. The adjusted geometric means of MPO levels at Week 26 and 52 were reported. The levels were analyzed using ANCOVA, with ACS status, pooled country and treatment included as covariates.
Time frame: Week 26 and Week 52
Population: Biomarker evaluable population
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (GEOMETRIC_MEAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Mean Myeloperoxidase (MPO) Levels as Circulating Biomarkers Associated With Inflammatory Burden at Week 26 and Week 52 | Week 26 (LOCF) | 324.534 picomole per litre (pmol/L) |
| Placebo | Mean Myeloperoxidase (MPO) Levels as Circulating Biomarkers Associated With Inflammatory Burden at Week 26 and Week 52 | Week 52 (LOCF) | 370.999 picomole per litre (pmol/L) |
| Darapladib 160 mg EC Tablet | Mean Myeloperoxidase (MPO) Levels as Circulating Biomarkers Associated With Inflammatory Burden at Week 26 and Week 52 | Week 26 (LOCF) | 378.811 picomole per litre (pmol/L) |
| Darapladib 160 mg EC Tablet | Mean Myeloperoxidase (MPO) Levels as Circulating Biomarkers Associated With Inflammatory Burden at Week 26 and Week 52 | Week 52 (LOCF) | 405.339 picomole per litre (pmol/L) |
Mean sCD40L Levels as Circulating Biomarkers Associated With Inflammatory Burden at Week 26 and Week 52
Blood was collected at baseline, Week 4, 13, 26 and 52 for evaluation of biomarkers. Mean sCD40L levels as circulating biomarker associated with inflammatory burden at Week 26 and Week 52 were assessed and reported. sCD40L had a skewed distribution and values were log transformed before analysis. The statistics was calculated on the log transformed data and back transformed. The adjusted geometric means of sCD40L levels at Week 26 and 52 were reported. The levels were analyzed using ANCOVA, with ACS status, pooled country and treatment included as covariates.
Time frame: Week 26 and Week 52
Population: Safety Population comprised of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Only those participants with data available at the indicated time points were analyzed.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Mean sCD40L Levels as Circulating Biomarkers Associated With Inflammatory Burden at Week 26 and Week 52 | Week 26 | 178.738 pg/ml |
| Placebo | Mean sCD40L Levels as Circulating Biomarkers Associated With Inflammatory Burden at Week 26 and Week 52 | Week 52 | 183.449 pg/ml |
| Darapladib 160 mg EC Tablet | Mean sCD40L Levels as Circulating Biomarkers Associated With Inflammatory Burden at Week 26 and Week 52 | Week 26 | 206.351 pg/ml |
| Darapladib 160 mg EC Tablet | Mean sCD40L Levels as Circulating Biomarkers Associated With Inflammatory Burden at Week 26 and Week 52 | Week 52 | 254.200 pg/ml |