Skip to content

Integrated Biomarker And Imaging Study - 2

An International, Multicenter, Randomized, Placebo-controlled, Parallel-group, 1 Year Treatment, Integrated Biomarkers and Imaging Study in Subjects With Angiographically Documented Coronary Heart Disease (CHD) to Examine the Effects of the Novel Lipoprotein-associated Phospholipase A2 (Lp-PLA2) Inhibitor SB-480848 on Intermediate Cardiovascular Endpoints, Patient Safety and Tolerability

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00268996
Enrollment
336
Registered
2005-12-23
Start date
2005-11-10
Completion date
2007-08-28
Last updated
2018-03-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Atherosclerosis

Keywords

Coronary artery disease, Lipoprotein-associated Phospholipase A2, palpography, hs-CRP, endothelial function, intravascular ultrasound

Brief summary

IBIS-2 is a study using SB-480848 versus placebo in subjects with angiographically documented coronary heart disease. Endpoints include coronary imaging, endothelial function, biomarkers, safety and tolerability.

Detailed description

Integrated Biomarker and Imaging Study -2 (IBIS-2): An International, Multicenter, Randomized, Placebo-controlled, Parallel-group, 1 Year Treatment, Integrated Biomarkers and Imaging Study in Subjects with Angiographically Documented Coronary Heart Disease (CHD) to Examine the Effects of the Novel Lipoprotein-associated Phospholipase A2 (Lp-PLA2) inhibitor SB-480848 on Intermediate Cardiovascular Endpoints, Patient Safety and Tolerability.

Interventions

SB-480848 is available as enteric-coated, free-base micronized tablet

DRUGSB-480848 matching placebo

Placebo is available as enteric-coated, free-base micronized tablet

Sponsors

GlaxoSmithKline
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Successful PCI (Percutaneous Coronary Intervention) or uncomplicated diagnostic catheterization * Suitable non-intervened coronary artery with IVUS * Antiplatelet therapy

Exclusion criteria

* Clinical instability * Previous CABG (Coronary Artery By-pass Graft) surgery * Planned major surgery * Recent stroke * Abnormal QTc * Renal or hepatic impairment * Uncontrolled hypertension * Use of corticosteroids * Class III or IV heart failure * Asthma

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean Circulating High Sensitivity C- Reactive Protein (Hs-CRP) Levels at Week 52.Week 52hs-CRP is a pentameric protein that is rapidly upregulated in response to inflammation and tissue damage and assessed as circulating biomarkers associated with atherosclerosis and cardiovascular risk. Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) data was reported. Only data from 3 months onwards was carried forward. hs-CRP has a skewed distribution and values were log transformed before analysis. The statistics was calculated on the log transformed data and back transformed. The adjusted geometric means of hs-CRP levels at Week 52 were reported. The levels were analyzed using analysis of co-variance (ANCOVA), with Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) status, pooled country and treatment included as covariates.
Change From Baseline in the Density of Rotterdam Classification (ROC) Grade III/IV Strain Spots/10 Millimeter (mm) Within the Region of Interest (ROI) on IVUS Grey Scale Based Palpography at the End of Week 52.Baseline and Week 52The ROC grade III/IV strain spots per 10 millimetre (mm) within the ROI on intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) grey scale based palpography were assessed and change from Baseline at end of 52 was reported. Change from Baseline was calculated as the density of spots at the end of study minus the density of spots recorded at Baseline. If either value was considered missing then the change from Baseline value was missing for the participant. Between treatment group comparisons of change from Baseline were analyzed using ANCOVA adjusting for ACS status, pooled country, Baseline value, matched segment length and treatment. Adjusted means and associated standard errors for each treatment group were presented. The baseline value for each participant was defined as the last value prior to the first dose of study drug.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Plaque Volume as IVUS-Grey Scale Assessments at Week 52Baseline and Week 52Change from Baseline was calculated for each IVUS grey scale assessment recorded at the end of study. The Baseline value for each participant was defined as the last value prior to the first dose of study drug. Change from Baseline was calculated as plaque volume at Week 52 minus Baseline value. The data was analyzed using ANCOVA, with ACS status, pooled country, Baseline value, matched segment length and treatment included as covariates.
Change From Baseline in Percent Obstruction Volume as IVUS-Grey Scale Assessments at Week 52Baseline and Week 52Change from Baseline in percent obstruction volume was calculated for each IVUS grey scale assessment recorded. Percent obstruction volume was calculated as (Plaque volume/ Vessel volume \*100). The Baseline value for each participant was defined as the last value prior to the first dose of study drug. Change from Baseline was calculated as plaque volume at Week 52 minus Baseline value. The data was analyzed using ANCOVA, with ACS status, pooled country, baseline value, matched segment length and treatment included as covariates.
Change From Baseline in Necrotic Core Volume as Intravenous Ultrasound-Virtual Histology (IVUS-VH) Assessments at Week 52Baseline and Week 52Change from Baseline was calculated for each IVUS-VH assessment recorded at the end of study. The necrotic core volume was calculated as mean necrotic area multiplied by mean of Baseline and follow-up length. Change from Baseline was calculated as plaque volume at Week 52 minus Baseline value. The data was analyzed using ANCOVA, with ACS status, pooled country, Baseline value, matched segment length and treatment included as covariates. The Baseline value for each participant was defined as the last value prior to the first dose of study drug. Change from Baseline in necrotic core volume as IVUS-VH assessments at Week 52 was reported.
Change From Baseline in Necrotic Core as a Percent of IVUS-VH Plaque at the End of Week 52.Baseline and Week 52Change from baseline was calculated for each IVUS-VH assessment recorded at the end of study. The baseline value for each participant was defined as the last value prior to the first dose of study drug. Change from baseline in percent necrotic core was calculated as percent necrotic core at Week 52 minus baseline value. The data was analyzed using ANCOVA, with ACS status, pooled country, baseline value, matched segment length and treatment included as covariates. Change from Baseline in necrotic core as a percent of IVUS-VH plaque at the end of week 52 was reported.
Mean Interlukin 6 (IL-6) Levels as Circulating Biomarkers Associated With Inflammatory Burden at Week 26 and Week 52Week 26 and Week 52Blood was collected at baseline, Week 4, 13, 26 and 52 for evaluation of biomarkers. Mean IL-6 levels as circulating biomarkers associated with inflammatory burden at Week 26 and Week 52 were assessed and reported. LOCF data was reported. Only data from 3 months onwards was carried forward. IL-6 had a skewed distribution and values were log transformed before analysis. The statistics was calculated on the log transformed data and back transformed. The adjusted geometric means of IL-6 levels at Week 26 and 52 were reported. The levels were analyzed using ANCOVA, with ACS status, pooled country and treatment included as covariates.
Mean Intercellular Adhesion Molecule-1 (ICAM-1) Levels as Circulating Biomarkers Associated With Inflammatory Burden at Week 26 and Week 52Week 26 and Week 52Blood was collected at baseline, Week 4, 13, 26 and 52 for evaluation of biomarkers. Mean ICAM-1 levels as circulating biomarkers associated with inflammatory burden at Week 26 and Week 52 were assessed and reported. LOCF data was reported. Only data from 3 months onwards was carried forward. ICAM-1 had a skewed distribution and values were log transformed before analysis. The statistics was calculated on the log transformed data and back transformed. The adjusted geometric means of ICAM-1 levels at Week 26 and 52 were reported. The levels were analyzed using ANCOVA, with ACS status, pooled country and treatment included as covariates.
Mean Myeloperoxidase (MPO) Levels as Circulating Biomarkers Associated With Inflammatory Burden at Week 26 and Week 52Week 26 and Week 52Blood was collected at baseline, Week 4, 13, 26 and 52 for evaluation of biomarkers. Mean MPO levels as circulating biomarkers associated with inflammatory burden at Week 26 and Week 52 were assessed and reported. LOCF data was reported. Only data from 3 months onwards was carried forward. MPO had a skewed distribution and values were log transformed before analysis. The statistics was calculated on the log transformed data and back transformed. The adjusted geometric means of MPO levels at Week 26 and 52 were reported. The levels were analyzed using ANCOVA, with ACS status, pooled country and treatment included as covariates.
Circulating Hs-CRP at the End of Week 26.Week 26hs-CRP is a pentameric protein that is rapidly upregulated in response to inflammation and tissue damage and assessed as circulating biomarkers associated with atherosclerosis and cardiovascular risk. LOCF data was reported. Only data from 3 months onwards was carried forward. hs-CRP has a skewed distribution and values were log transformed before analysis. The statistics was calculated on the log transformed data and back transformed. The adjusted geometric means of hs-CRP levels at Week 26 were reported. The levels were analyzed using ANCOVA, with ACS status, pooled country and treatment included as covariates.
Mean Matrix Metaloproteinases-9 (MMP-9) Levels as Circulating Biomarkers Associated With Plaque Instability at Week 26 and Week 52.Week 26 and Week 52Blood was collected at baseline, Week 4, 13, 26 and 52 for evaluation of biomarkers. Mean MMP-9 levels as circulating biomarkers associated with plaque instability at Week 26 and Week 52 were assessed and reported. LOCF data was reported. Only data from 3 months onwards was carried forward MMP-9 had a skewed distribution and values were log transformed before analysis. The statistics was calculated on the log transformed data and back transformed. The adjusted geometric means of MMP-9 levels at Week 26 and 52 were reported. The levels were analyzed using ANCOVA, with ACS status, pooled country and treatment included as covariates.
Mean Levels of Oxidised Phospholipids/ Apolipoprotein B100 (oxPL/apoB) Ratio as Target Circulating Biomarkers at the End of Week 26 and Week 52.Week 26 and Week 52Blood was collected at baseline, Week 4, 13, 26 and 52 for evaluation of biomarkers. Mean OXPL/LAPO B levels as circulating biomarkers associated with Lp-PLA2 target-related biomarkers at Week 26 and Week 52 were assessed and reported. LOCF data was reported. Only data from 3 months onwards was carried forward. OXPL/LAPO B had a skewed distribution and values were log transformed before analysis. The statistics was calculated on the log transformed data and back transformed. The adjusted geometric means of OXPL/LAPO B levels at Week 26 and 52 were reported. The levels were analyzed using ANCOVA, with ACS status, pooled country and treatment included as covariates.
Mean Levels of Oxidized Non-esterified Fatty Acids (Ox-NEFA) as Target Circulating Biomarkers at the End of Week 26 and Week 52Week 26 and Week 52Mean ox-NEFA levels as circulating biomarkers associated with Lp-PLA2 target-related biomarkers at Week 26 and Week 52 was planned to be assessed. However, the parameter data were not collected for this endpoint.
Change From Baseline in Vessel Volume and Lumen Volume as IVUS-Grey Scale Assessments at Week 52.Baseline and Week 52Change from baseline in vessel volume and lumen volume calculated for each IVUS grey scale assessment recorded. Vessel volume (i.e., coronary remodelling) defined by the leading edge of echogenic adventitia/external elastic membrane (EEM) and calculated as, mean vessel area multiplied mean of vessel length at Baseline and Follow-up. Lumen volume was circumscribed by the leading edge of intima/plaque and calculated as mean lumen area multiplied by mean lumen length at Baseline and Follow-up. The baseline value for each participant was defined as the last value prior to the first dose of study drug. Change from baseline was calculated as vessel volume or lumen volume at Week 52 minus baseline value.
Change From Baseline in Mean Plaque Area, Mean Vessel Area, and Mean Lumen Area as IVUS-Grey Scale Assessments at Week 52.Baseline and Week 52Change from baseline in was mean plaque area, mean vessel area, and mean lumen area were derived from IVUS system at each IVUS grey scale assessment recorded. The baseline value for each participant was defined as the last value prior to the first dose of study drug. Change from baseline was calculated as mean area of the parameter (plaque/vessel/lumen) at Week 52 minus baseline value. The data was reported based on observed cases. Data analyzed using ANCOVA, with ACS status, pooled country, baseline value, matched segment length and treatment included as covariates.
Change From Baseline in Fibrous Tissue Volume and Fibro-fatty Volume as IVUS-VH Assessments at Week 52Baseline and Week 52Change from baseline in fibrous tissue volume and fibro-fatty volume were derived from IVUS system at each IVUS grey scale assessment recorded. Fibrous tissue volume was calculated as mean fibro-fatty area multiplied by mean of Baseline and Follow-up length. Fibro-fatty volume was calculated as mean fibrous area multiplied by mean of Baseline and Follow-up length. The baseline value for each participant was defined as the last value prior to the first dose of study drug. Change from baseline was calculated as mean Fibrous tissue volume or Fibro-fatty volume at Week 52 minus baseline value. The data was reported based on observed cases. Data analyzed using ANCOVA, with ACS status, pooled country, baseline value , matched segment length and treatment included as covariates.
Change From Baseline in Fibrous Tissue and Fibro-fatty as a Percent of IVUS-VH Plaque as IVUS-VH Assessments at Week 52Baseline and Week 52Fibro-fatty as percentage of VH plaque and Fibrous tissue as percentage of VH plaque were derived from IVUS-VH system. The baseline value for each participant was defined as the last value prior to the first dose of study drug. Change from baseline was calculated as Fibro-fatty as percentage of VH plaque or Fibrous tissue as percentage of VH plaque at Week 52 minus baseline value. The data was reported based on observed cases. Data analyzed using ANCOVA, with ACS status, pooled country, baseline value , matched segment length and treatment included as covariates.
Mean sCD40L Levels as Circulating Biomarkers Associated With Inflammatory Burden at Week 26 and Week 52Week 26 and Week 52Blood was collected at baseline, Week 4, 13, 26 and 52 for evaluation of biomarkers. Mean sCD40L levels as circulating biomarker associated with inflammatory burden at Week 26 and Week 52 were assessed and reported. sCD40L had a skewed distribution and values were log transformed before analysis. The statistics was calculated on the log transformed data and back transformed. The adjusted geometric means of sCD40L levels at Week 26 and 52 were reported. The levels were analyzed using ANCOVA, with ACS status, pooled country and treatment included as covariates.
Mean Lipoprotein Phospholipase A2 (Lp-PLA2) Activity at the End of Week 26 and Week 52Week 26 and Week 52Lp-PLA2 is a calcium-independent phospholipase A2 enzyme associated with low density lipoprotein (LDL) in plasma. Blood samples were collected at baseline and at Week 4, 13, 26, and 52 and Lp-PLA2 activity was determined. Percentage inhibition of Lp-PLA2 activity relative to baseline was calculated as, percent inhibition = (\[baseline value - post baseline value\] x 100) / baseline value. The baseline value for each participant was defined as the last value prior to the first dose of study drug.

Countries

Austria, Belgium, Czechia, Denmark, France, Germany, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Spain, Switzerland

Participant flow

Recruitment details

The study was conducted in participants with angiographically documented coronary artery disease (CHD) at 23 sites in 10 countries. The study was initiated on 10 November 2005 and completed on 28 August 2007.

Pre-assignment details

There were 451 participants screened for enrollment of whom 121 failed screening. A total of 330 participants were randomized to receive treatment. Among the randomized participants, 4 from placebo arm and 3 from darapladib arm did not receive study drug. The remaining 323 participants received at least one dose of study drug.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Placebo
Eligible participants received the matching placebo for 52 weeks. Participants were instructed to administer one tablet (swallowed intact and not chewed) in the morning each day with food.
151
Darapladib 160 mg EC Tablet
Eligible participants received darapladib 160 mg EC tablet once daily for 52 weeks. Participants were instructed to administer one tablet (swallowed intact and not chewed) in the morning each day with food.
172
Total323

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event117
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up31
Overall StudyNon-compliance10
Overall StudyOther11
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject511

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicDarapladib 160 mg EC TabletTotalPlacebo
Age, Continuous59.4 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.81
58.4 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.36
57.3 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.86
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
1 Participants3 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants3 Participants3 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
171 Participants317 Participants146 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
32 Participants57 Participants25 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
140 Participants266 Participants126 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 1510 / 172
other
Total, other adverse events
37 / 15159 / 172
serious
Total, serious adverse events
45 / 15146 / 172

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline in the Density of Rotterdam Classification (ROC) Grade III/IV Strain Spots/10 Millimeter (mm) Within the Region of Interest (ROI) on IVUS Grey Scale Based Palpography at the End of Week 52.

The ROC grade III/IV strain spots per 10 millimetre (mm) within the ROI on intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) grey scale based palpography were assessed and change from Baseline at end of 52 was reported. Change from Baseline was calculated as the density of spots at the end of study minus the density of spots recorded at Baseline. If either value was considered missing then the change from Baseline value was missing for the participant. Between treatment group comparisons of change from Baseline were analyzed using ANCOVA adjusting for ACS status, pooled country, Baseline value, matched segment length and treatment. Adjusted means and associated standard errors for each treatment group were presented. The baseline value for each participant was defined as the last value prior to the first dose of study drug.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 52

Population: The imaging evaluable population was comprised of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug, with an evaluable baseline and end of treatment imaging assessment at 6 months (Day 154) or later. The participants available at the time of assessment were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Density of Rotterdam Classification (ROC) Grade III/IV Strain Spots/10 Millimeter (mm) Within the Region of Interest (ROI) on IVUS Grey Scale Based Palpography at the End of Week 52.0.003 Spots/10 mmStandard Error 0.048
Darapladib 160 mg EC TabletChange From Baseline in the Density of Rotterdam Classification (ROC) Grade III/IV Strain Spots/10 Millimeter (mm) Within the Region of Interest (ROI) on IVUS Grey Scale Based Palpography at the End of Week 52.-0.079 Spots/10 mmStandard Error 0.045
p-value: 0.2295% CI: [-0.214, 0.049]ANCOVA
Primary

Mean Circulating High Sensitivity C- Reactive Protein (Hs-CRP) Levels at Week 52.

hs-CRP is a pentameric protein that is rapidly upregulated in response to inflammation and tissue damage and assessed as circulating biomarkers associated with atherosclerosis and cardiovascular risk. Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) data was reported. Only data from 3 months onwards was carried forward. hs-CRP has a skewed distribution and values were log transformed before analysis. The statistics was calculated on the log transformed data and back transformed. The adjusted geometric means of hs-CRP levels at Week 52 were reported. The levels were analyzed using analysis of co-variance (ANCOVA), with Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) status, pooled country and treatment included as covariates.

Time frame: Week 52

Population: The biomarker evaluable population was comprised of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug, with an evaluable biomarker assessment at 3 months (Day 77) or later.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)
PlaceboMean Circulating High Sensitivity C- Reactive Protein (Hs-CRP) Levels at Week 52.1.034 mg per litre (mg/L)
Darapladib 160 mg EC TabletMean Circulating High Sensitivity C- Reactive Protein (Hs-CRP) Levels at Week 52.0.913 mg per litre (mg/L)
p-value: 0.34895% CI: [-31.995, 14.607]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Fibrous Tissue and Fibro-fatty as a Percent of IVUS-VH Plaque as IVUS-VH Assessments at Week 52

Fibro-fatty as percentage of VH plaque and Fibrous tissue as percentage of VH plaque were derived from IVUS-VH system. The baseline value for each participant was defined as the last value prior to the first dose of study drug. Change from baseline was calculated as Fibro-fatty as percentage of VH plaque or Fibrous tissue as percentage of VH plaque at Week 52 minus baseline value. The data was reported based on observed cases. Data analyzed using ANCOVA, with ACS status, pooled country, baseline value , matched segment length and treatment included as covariates.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 52

Population: Imaging evaluable population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Fibrous Tissue and Fibro-fatty as a Percent of IVUS-VH Plaque as IVUS-VH Assessments at Week 52Fibrous tissue as percentage of VH plaque-4.007 Percentage of VHStandard Error 0.631
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Fibrous Tissue and Fibro-fatty as a Percent of IVUS-VH Plaque as IVUS-VH Assessments at Week 52Fibro-fatty as percentage of VH plaque-0.782 Percentage of VHStandard Error 0.881
Darapladib 160 mg EC TabletChange From Baseline in Fibrous Tissue and Fibro-fatty as a Percent of IVUS-VH Plaque as IVUS-VH Assessments at Week 52Fibrous tissue as percentage of VH plaque-2.007 Percentage of VHStandard Error 0.582
Darapladib 160 mg EC TabletChange From Baseline in Fibrous Tissue and Fibro-fatty as a Percent of IVUS-VH Plaque as IVUS-VH Assessments at Week 52Fibro-fatty as percentage of VH plaque-0.043 Percentage of VHStandard Error 0.813
Comparison: Placebo vs Darapladib 160 mg EC tablet: Fibrous tissue as % of VH plaquep-value: 0.02195% CI: [0.299, 3.701]ANOVA
Comparison: Placebo vs Darapladib 160 mg EC tablet: Fibro-fatty as percentage of VH plaquep-value: 0.5495% CI: [-1.635, 3.114]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Fibrous Tissue Volume and Fibro-fatty Volume as IVUS-VH Assessments at Week 52

Change from baseline in fibrous tissue volume and fibro-fatty volume were derived from IVUS system at each IVUS grey scale assessment recorded. Fibrous tissue volume was calculated as mean fibro-fatty area multiplied by mean of Baseline and Follow-up length. Fibro-fatty volume was calculated as mean fibrous area multiplied by mean of Baseline and Follow-up length. The baseline value for each participant was defined as the last value prior to the first dose of study drug. Change from baseline was calculated as mean Fibrous tissue volume or Fibro-fatty volume at Week 52 minus baseline value. The data was reported based on observed cases. Data analyzed using ANCOVA, with ACS status, pooled country, baseline value , matched segment length and treatment included as covariates.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 52

Population: Imaging evaluable population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Fibrous Tissue Volume and Fibro-fatty Volume as IVUS-VH Assessments at Week 52Fibrous tissue volume-6.985 mm^3Standard Error 2.312
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Fibrous Tissue Volume and Fibro-fatty Volume as IVUS-VH Assessments at Week 52Fibro-fatty volume-3.342 mm^3Standard Error 1.734
Darapladib 160 mg EC TabletChange From Baseline in Fibrous Tissue Volume and Fibro-fatty Volume as IVUS-VH Assessments at Week 52Fibro-fatty volume-1.415 mm^3Standard Error 1.6
Darapladib 160 mg EC TabletChange From Baseline in Fibrous Tissue Volume and Fibro-fatty Volume as IVUS-VH Assessments at Week 52Fibrous tissue volume-7.569 mm^3Standard Error 2.133
Comparison: Placebo vs Darapladib 160 mg EC tablet: Fibrous tissue volumep-value: 0.85495% CI: [-6.819, 5.65]ANCOVA
Comparison: Placebo vs Darapladib 160 mg EC tablet: Fibro-fatty volumep-value: 0.41895% CI: [-2.748, 6.6]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Mean Plaque Area, Mean Vessel Area, and Mean Lumen Area as IVUS-Grey Scale Assessments at Week 52.

Change from baseline in was mean plaque area, mean vessel area, and mean lumen area were derived from IVUS system at each IVUS grey scale assessment recorded. The baseline value for each participant was defined as the last value prior to the first dose of study drug. Change from baseline was calculated as mean area of the parameter (plaque/vessel/lumen) at Week 52 minus baseline value. The data was reported based on observed cases. Data analyzed using ANCOVA, with ACS status, pooled country, baseline value, matched segment length and treatment included as covariates.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 52

Population: Imaging evaluable population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Mean Plaque Area, Mean Vessel Area, and Mean Lumen Area as IVUS-Grey Scale Assessments at Week 52.Mean plaque area-0.112 mm2Standard Error 0.056
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Mean Plaque Area, Mean Vessel Area, and Mean Lumen Area as IVUS-Grey Scale Assessments at Week 52.Mean vessel area-0.242 mm2Standard Error 0.115
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Mean Plaque Area, Mean Vessel Area, and Mean Lumen Area as IVUS-Grey Scale Assessments at Week 52.Mean lumen area-0.130 mm2Standard Error 0.112
Darapladib 160 mg EC TabletChange From Baseline in Mean Plaque Area, Mean Vessel Area, and Mean Lumen Area as IVUS-Grey Scale Assessments at Week 52.Mean plaque area-0.124 mm2Standard Error 0.05
Darapladib 160 mg EC TabletChange From Baseline in Mean Plaque Area, Mean Vessel Area, and Mean Lumen Area as IVUS-Grey Scale Assessments at Week 52.Mean vessel area-0.194 mm2Standard Error 0.104
Darapladib 160 mg EC TabletChange From Baseline in Mean Plaque Area, Mean Vessel Area, and Mean Lumen Area as IVUS-Grey Scale Assessments at Week 52.Mean lumen area-0.069 mm2Standard Error 0.101
Comparison: Placebo vs Darapladib 160 mg EC tablet: Mean vessel areap-value: 0.87395% CI: [-0.16, 0.136]ANCOVA
Comparison: Placebo vs Darapladib 160 mg EC tablet: Mean vessel areap-value: 0.75695% CI: [-0.258, 0.354]ANCOVA
Comparison: Placebo vs Darapladib 160 mg EC tablet: Mean lumen areap-value: 0.68795% CI: [-0.237, 0.36]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Necrotic Core as a Percent of IVUS-VH Plaque at the End of Week 52.

Change from baseline was calculated for each IVUS-VH assessment recorded at the end of study. The baseline value for each participant was defined as the last value prior to the first dose of study drug. Change from baseline in percent necrotic core was calculated as percent necrotic core at Week 52 minus baseline value. The data was analyzed using ANCOVA, with ACS status, pooled country, baseline value, matched segment length and treatment included as covariates. Change from Baseline in necrotic core as a percent of IVUS-VH plaque at the end of week 52 was reported.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 52

Population: Imaging evaluable population

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Necrotic Core as a Percent of IVUS-VH Plaque at the End of Week 52.2.502 Percent Necrotic coreStandard Error 0.722
Darapladib 160 mg EC TabletChange From Baseline in Necrotic Core as a Percent of IVUS-VH Plaque at the End of Week 52.0.535 Percent Necrotic coreStandard Error 0.666
p-value: 0.04795% CI: [-3.912, -0.022]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Necrotic Core Volume as Intravenous Ultrasound-Virtual Histology (IVUS-VH) Assessments at Week 52

Change from Baseline was calculated for each IVUS-VH assessment recorded at the end of study. The necrotic core volume was calculated as mean necrotic area multiplied by mean of Baseline and follow-up length. Change from Baseline was calculated as plaque volume at Week 52 minus Baseline value. The data was analyzed using ANCOVA, with ACS status, pooled country, Baseline value, matched segment length and treatment included as covariates. The Baseline value for each participant was defined as the last value prior to the first dose of study drug. Change from Baseline in necrotic core volume as IVUS-VH assessments at Week 52 was reported.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 52

Population: Imaging evaluable population. Only those participants with data available at the indicated time points were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Necrotic Core Volume as Intravenous Ultrasound-Virtual Histology (IVUS-VH) Assessments at Week 524.633 mm^3Standard Error 1.491
Darapladib 160 mg EC TabletChange From Baseline in Necrotic Core Volume as Intravenous Ultrasound-Virtual Histology (IVUS-VH) Assessments at Week 52-0.531 mm^3Standard Error 1.376
p-value: 0.01295% CI: [-9.185, -1.145]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Percent Obstruction Volume as IVUS-Grey Scale Assessments at Week 52

Change from Baseline in percent obstruction volume was calculated for each IVUS grey scale assessment recorded. Percent obstruction volume was calculated as (Plaque volume/ Vessel volume \*100). The Baseline value for each participant was defined as the last value prior to the first dose of study drug. Change from Baseline was calculated as plaque volume at Week 52 minus Baseline value. The data was analyzed using ANCOVA, with ACS status, pooled country, baseline value, matched segment length and treatment included as covariates.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 52

Population: Imaging evaluable population

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Percent Obstruction Volume as IVUS-Grey Scale Assessments at Week 520.007 Percentage of mm^3Standard Error 0.354
Darapladib 160 mg EC TabletChange From Baseline in Percent Obstruction Volume as IVUS-Grey Scale Assessments at Week 52-0.054 Percentage of mm^3Standard Error 0.321
p-value: 0.89895% CI: [-1.009, 0.886]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Plaque Volume as IVUS-Grey Scale Assessments at Week 52

Change from Baseline was calculated for each IVUS grey scale assessment recorded at the end of study. The Baseline value for each participant was defined as the last value prior to the first dose of study drug. Change from Baseline was calculated as plaque volume at Week 52 minus Baseline value. The data was analyzed using ANCOVA, with ACS status, pooled country, Baseline value, matched segment length and treatment included as covariates.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 52

Population: Imaging evaluable population

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Plaque Volume as IVUS-Grey Scale Assessments at Week 52-5.126 Cubic millimetre (mm^3)Standard Error 2.715
Darapladib 160 mg EC TabletChange From Baseline in Plaque Volume as IVUS-Grey Scale Assessments at Week 52-4.873 Cubic millimetre (mm^3)Standard Error 2.464
p-value: 0.94595% CI: [-6.998, 7.504]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Vessel Volume and Lumen Volume as IVUS-Grey Scale Assessments at Week 52.

Change from baseline in vessel volume and lumen volume calculated for each IVUS grey scale assessment recorded. Vessel volume (i.e., coronary remodelling) defined by the leading edge of echogenic adventitia/external elastic membrane (EEM) and calculated as, mean vessel area multiplied mean of vessel length at Baseline and Follow-up. Lumen volume was circumscribed by the leading edge of intima/plaque and calculated as mean lumen area multiplied by mean lumen length at Baseline and Follow-up. The baseline value for each participant was defined as the last value prior to the first dose of study drug. Change from baseline was calculated as vessel volume or lumen volume at Week 52 minus baseline value.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 52

Population: Imaging evaluable population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Vessel Volume and Lumen Volume as IVUS-Grey Scale Assessments at Week 52.Vessel volume-11.211 mm^3Standard Error 5.4
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Vessel Volume and Lumen Volume as IVUS-Grey Scale Assessments at Week 52.Lumen volume-6.693 mm^3Standard Error 5.16
Darapladib 160 mg EC TabletChange From Baseline in Vessel Volume and Lumen Volume as IVUS-Grey Scale Assessments at Week 52.Vessel volume-9.453 mm^3Standard Error 4.901
Darapladib 160 mg EC TabletChange From Baseline in Vessel Volume and Lumen Volume as IVUS-Grey Scale Assessments at Week 52.Lumen volume-4.066 mm^3Standard Error 4.682
Comparison: For vessel volumep-value: 0.81195% CI: [-12.675, 16.192]ANCOVA
Comparison: For lumen volumep-value: 0.70895% CI: [-11.171, 16.425]ANCOVA
Secondary

Circulating Hs-CRP at the End of Week 26.

hs-CRP is a pentameric protein that is rapidly upregulated in response to inflammation and tissue damage and assessed as circulating biomarkers associated with atherosclerosis and cardiovascular risk. LOCF data was reported. Only data from 3 months onwards was carried forward. hs-CRP has a skewed distribution and values were log transformed before analysis. The statistics was calculated on the log transformed data and back transformed. The adjusted geometric means of hs-CRP levels at Week 26 were reported. The levels were analyzed using ANCOVA, with ACS status, pooled country and treatment included as covariates.

Time frame: Week 26

Population: Biomarker evaluable population

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)
PlaceboCirculating Hs-CRP at the End of Week 26.0.924 mg/L
Darapladib 160 mg EC TabletCirculating Hs-CRP at the End of Week 26.0.960 mg/L
p-value: 0.75195% CI: [-18.331, 32.379]ANCOVA
Secondary

Mean Intercellular Adhesion Molecule-1 (ICAM-1) Levels as Circulating Biomarkers Associated With Inflammatory Burden at Week 26 and Week 52

Blood was collected at baseline, Week 4, 13, 26 and 52 for evaluation of biomarkers. Mean ICAM-1 levels as circulating biomarkers associated with inflammatory burden at Week 26 and Week 52 were assessed and reported. LOCF data was reported. Only data from 3 months onwards was carried forward. ICAM-1 had a skewed distribution and values were log transformed before analysis. The statistics was calculated on the log transformed data and back transformed. The adjusted geometric means of ICAM-1 levels at Week 26 and 52 were reported. The levels were analyzed using ANCOVA, with ACS status, pooled country and treatment included as covariates.

Time frame: Week 26 and Week 52

Population: Biomarker evaluable population.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)
PlaceboMean Intercellular Adhesion Molecule-1 (ICAM-1) Levels as Circulating Biomarkers Associated With Inflammatory Burden at Week 26 and Week 52Week 26 (LOCF)269.444 nanogram per millilitre (ng/mL)
PlaceboMean Intercellular Adhesion Molecule-1 (ICAM-1) Levels as Circulating Biomarkers Associated With Inflammatory Burden at Week 26 and Week 52Week 52 (LOCF)277.947 nanogram per millilitre (ng/mL)
Darapladib 160 mg EC TabletMean Intercellular Adhesion Molecule-1 (ICAM-1) Levels as Circulating Biomarkers Associated With Inflammatory Burden at Week 26 and Week 52Week 26 (LOCF)266.447 nanogram per millilitre (ng/mL)
Darapladib 160 mg EC TabletMean Intercellular Adhesion Molecule-1 (ICAM-1) Levels as Circulating Biomarkers Associated With Inflammatory Burden at Week 26 and Week 52Week 52 (LOCF)268.950 nanogram per millilitre (ng/mL)
Comparison: Placebo vs Darapladib 160 mg EC tablet once daily at Week 26 (LOCF)p-value: 0.68795% CI: [-6.363, 4.433]ANCOVA
p-value: 0.2995% CI: [-8.976, 2.865]ANOVA
Secondary

Mean Interlukin 6 (IL-6) Levels as Circulating Biomarkers Associated With Inflammatory Burden at Week 26 and Week 52

Blood was collected at baseline, Week 4, 13, 26 and 52 for evaluation of biomarkers. Mean IL-6 levels as circulating biomarkers associated with inflammatory burden at Week 26 and Week 52 were assessed and reported. LOCF data was reported. Only data from 3 months onwards was carried forward. IL-6 had a skewed distribution and values were log transformed before analysis. The statistics was calculated on the log transformed data and back transformed. The adjusted geometric means of IL-6 levels at Week 26 and 52 were reported. The levels were analyzed using ANCOVA, with ACS status, pooled country and treatment included as covariates.

Time frame: Week 26 and Week 52

Population: Biomarker evaluable population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)
PlaceboMean Interlukin 6 (IL-6) Levels as Circulating Biomarkers Associated With Inflammatory Burden at Week 26 and Week 52Week 26 LOCF1.851 Nanograms per litre (ng/L)
PlaceboMean Interlukin 6 (IL-6) Levels as Circulating Biomarkers Associated With Inflammatory Burden at Week 26 and Week 52Week 52 LOCF2.019 Nanograms per litre (ng/L)
Darapladib 160 mg EC TabletMean Interlukin 6 (IL-6) Levels as Circulating Biomarkers Associated With Inflammatory Burden at Week 26 and Week 52Week 26 LOCF1.979 Nanograms per litre (ng/L)
Darapladib 160 mg EC TabletMean Interlukin 6 (IL-6) Levels as Circulating Biomarkers Associated With Inflammatory Burden at Week 26 and Week 52Week 52 LOCF2.267 Nanograms per litre (ng/L)
Comparison: Week 26 (LOCF): Comparison between Placebo vs Darapladib 160 mg EC tabletp-value: 0.48795% CI: [-11.568, 29.364]ANCOVA
Comparison: Week 52 (LOCF): Comparison between Placebo Vs Darapladib 160 mg EC tabletp-value: 0.24795% CI: [-7.725, 36.562]ANCOVA
Secondary

Mean Levels of Oxidised Phospholipids/ Apolipoprotein B100 (oxPL/apoB) Ratio as Target Circulating Biomarkers at the End of Week 26 and Week 52.

Blood was collected at baseline, Week 4, 13, 26 and 52 for evaluation of biomarkers. Mean OXPL/LAPO B levels as circulating biomarkers associated with Lp-PLA2 target-related biomarkers at Week 26 and Week 52 were assessed and reported. LOCF data was reported. Only data from 3 months onwards was carried forward. OXPL/LAPO B had a skewed distribution and values were log transformed before analysis. The statistics was calculated on the log transformed data and back transformed. The adjusted geometric means of OXPL/LAPO B levels at Week 26 and 52 were reported. The levels were analyzed using ANCOVA, with ACS status, pooled country and treatment included as covariates.

Time frame: Week 26 and Week 52

Population: Biomarker evaluable population.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)
PlaceboMean Levels of Oxidised Phospholipids/ Apolipoprotein B100 (oxPL/apoB) Ratio as Target Circulating Biomarkers at the End of Week 26 and Week 52.Week 26 LOCF3114.718 Relative light units (RLU)
PlaceboMean Levels of Oxidised Phospholipids/ Apolipoprotein B100 (oxPL/apoB) Ratio as Target Circulating Biomarkers at the End of Week 26 and Week 52.Week 52 LOCF2711.118 Relative light units (RLU)
Darapladib 160 mg EC TabletMean Levels of Oxidised Phospholipids/ Apolipoprotein B100 (oxPL/apoB) Ratio as Target Circulating Biomarkers at the End of Week 26 and Week 52.Week 26 LOCF3106.872 Relative light units (RLU)
Darapladib 160 mg EC TabletMean Levels of Oxidised Phospholipids/ Apolipoprotein B100 (oxPL/apoB) Ratio as Target Circulating Biomarkers at the End of Week 26 and Week 52.Week 52 LOCF2478.376 Relative light units (RLU)
Comparison: Placebo vs Darapladib 160 mg EC tablet once daily at Week 26 (LOCF)p-value: 0.9895% CI: [-18.151, 21.561]ANCOVA
Comparison: Placebo vs Darapladib 160 mg EC tablet once daily at Week 52 (LOCF)p-value: 0.66395% CI: [-39.007, 37.012]ANCOVA
Secondary

Mean Levels of Oxidized Non-esterified Fatty Acids (Ox-NEFA) as Target Circulating Biomarkers at the End of Week 26 and Week 52

Mean ox-NEFA levels as circulating biomarkers associated with Lp-PLA2 target-related biomarkers at Week 26 and Week 52 was planned to be assessed. However, the parameter data were not collected for this endpoint.

Time frame: Week 26 and Week 52

Population: Biomarker evaluable population

Secondary

Mean Lipoprotein Phospholipase A2 (Lp-PLA2) Activity at the End of Week 26 and Week 52

Lp-PLA2 is a calcium-independent phospholipase A2 enzyme associated with low density lipoprotein (LDL) in plasma. Blood samples were collected at baseline and at Week 4, 13, 26, and 52 and Lp-PLA2 activity was determined. Percentage inhibition of Lp-PLA2 activity relative to baseline was calculated as, percent inhibition = (\[baseline value - post baseline value\] x 100) / baseline value. The baseline value for each participant was defined as the last value prior to the first dose of study drug.

Time frame: Week 26 and Week 52

Population: The biomarker evaluable population was comprised of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug, with an evaluable biomarker assessment at 3 months (Day 77) or later.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)
PlaceboMean Lipoprotein Phospholipase A2 (Lp-PLA2) Activity at the End of Week 26 and Week 52Week 26 LOCF151.412 micromole per minute per Litre
PlaceboMean Lipoprotein Phospholipase A2 (Lp-PLA2) Activity at the End of Week 26 and Week 52Week 52 LOCF152.061 micromole per minute per Litre
Darapladib 160 mg EC TabletMean Lipoprotein Phospholipase A2 (Lp-PLA2) Activity at the End of Week 26 and Week 52Week 52 LOCF61.850 micromole per minute per Litre
Darapladib 160 mg EC TabletMean Lipoprotein Phospholipase A2 (Lp-PLA2) Activity at the End of Week 26 and Week 52Week 26 LOCF59.449 micromole per minute per Litre
Comparison: Placebo vs Darapladib 160 mg EC tablet at Week 26 (LOCF)p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-63.486, -57.78]ANCOVA
Comparison: Placebo vs Darapladib 160 mg EC tablet at Week 52 (LOCF)p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-62.21, -56.222]ANCOVA
Secondary

Mean Matrix Metaloproteinases-9 (MMP-9) Levels as Circulating Biomarkers Associated With Plaque Instability at Week 26 and Week 52.

Blood was collected at baseline, Week 4, 13, 26 and 52 for evaluation of biomarkers. Mean MMP-9 levels as circulating biomarkers associated with plaque instability at Week 26 and Week 52 were assessed and reported. LOCF data was reported. Only data from 3 months onwards was carried forward MMP-9 had a skewed distribution and values were log transformed before analysis. The statistics was calculated on the log transformed data and back transformed. The adjusted geometric means of MMP-9 levels at Week 26 and 52 were reported. The levels were analyzed using ANCOVA, with ACS status, pooled country and treatment included as covariates.

Time frame: Week 26 and Week 52

Population: Biomarker evaluable population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)
PlaceboMean Matrix Metaloproteinases-9 (MMP-9) Levels as Circulating Biomarkers Associated With Plaque Instability at Week 26 and Week 52.Week 26 LOCF481.581 microgram per litre (mcg/L)
PlaceboMean Matrix Metaloproteinases-9 (MMP-9) Levels as Circulating Biomarkers Associated With Plaque Instability at Week 26 and Week 52.Week 52 LOCF488.998 microgram per litre (mcg/L)
Darapladib 160 mg EC TabletMean Matrix Metaloproteinases-9 (MMP-9) Levels as Circulating Biomarkers Associated With Plaque Instability at Week 26 and Week 52.Week 26 LOCF471.477 microgram per litre (mcg/L)
Darapladib 160 mg EC TabletMean Matrix Metaloproteinases-9 (MMP-9) Levels as Circulating Biomarkers Associated With Plaque Instability at Week 26 and Week 52.Week 52 LOCF498.709 microgram per litre (mcg/L)
Comparison: Placebo vs Darapladib 160 mg EC tablet once daily at Week 26 (LOCF)p-value: 0.7995% CI: [-16.303, 14.517]ANCOVA
Comparison: Placebo vs Darapladib 160 mg EC tablet once daily at Week 52 (LOCF)p-value: 0.81895% CI: [-13.807, 20.673]ANCOVA
Secondary

Mean Myeloperoxidase (MPO) Levels as Circulating Biomarkers Associated With Inflammatory Burden at Week 26 and Week 52

Blood was collected at baseline, Week 4, 13, 26 and 52 for evaluation of biomarkers. Mean MPO levels as circulating biomarkers associated with inflammatory burden at Week 26 and Week 52 were assessed and reported. LOCF data was reported. Only data from 3 months onwards was carried forward. MPO had a skewed distribution and values were log transformed before analysis. The statistics was calculated on the log transformed data and back transformed. The adjusted geometric means of MPO levels at Week 26 and 52 were reported. The levels were analyzed using ANCOVA, with ACS status, pooled country and treatment included as covariates.

Time frame: Week 26 and Week 52

Population: Biomarker evaluable population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)
PlaceboMean Myeloperoxidase (MPO) Levels as Circulating Biomarkers Associated With Inflammatory Burden at Week 26 and Week 52Week 26 (LOCF)324.534 picomole per litre (pmol/L)
PlaceboMean Myeloperoxidase (MPO) Levels as Circulating Biomarkers Associated With Inflammatory Burden at Week 26 and Week 52Week 52 (LOCF)370.999 picomole per litre (pmol/L)
Darapladib 160 mg EC TabletMean Myeloperoxidase (MPO) Levels as Circulating Biomarkers Associated With Inflammatory Burden at Week 26 and Week 52Week 26 (LOCF)378.811 picomole per litre (pmol/L)
Darapladib 160 mg EC TabletMean Myeloperoxidase (MPO) Levels as Circulating Biomarkers Associated With Inflammatory Burden at Week 26 and Week 52Week 52 (LOCF)405.339 picomole per litre (pmol/L)
Comparison: Placebo vs Darapladib 160 mg EC tablet once daily at Week 26 (LOCF)p-value: 0.02295% CI: [2.232, 33.271]ANCOVA
Comparison: Placebo vs Darapladib 160 mg EC tablet once daily at Week 52 (LOCF)p-value: 0.25295% CI: [-6.136, 27.172]ANCOVA
Secondary

Mean sCD40L Levels as Circulating Biomarkers Associated With Inflammatory Burden at Week 26 and Week 52

Blood was collected at baseline, Week 4, 13, 26 and 52 for evaluation of biomarkers. Mean sCD40L levels as circulating biomarker associated with inflammatory burden at Week 26 and Week 52 were assessed and reported. sCD40L had a skewed distribution and values were log transformed before analysis. The statistics was calculated on the log transformed data and back transformed. The adjusted geometric means of sCD40L levels at Week 26 and 52 were reported. The levels were analyzed using ANCOVA, with ACS status, pooled country and treatment included as covariates.

Time frame: Week 26 and Week 52

Population: Safety Population comprised of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Only those participants with data available at the indicated time points were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
PlaceboMean sCD40L Levels as Circulating Biomarkers Associated With Inflammatory Burden at Week 26 and Week 52Week 26178.738 pg/ml
PlaceboMean sCD40L Levels as Circulating Biomarkers Associated With Inflammatory Burden at Week 26 and Week 52Week 52183.449 pg/ml
Darapladib 160 mg EC TabletMean sCD40L Levels as Circulating Biomarkers Associated With Inflammatory Burden at Week 26 and Week 52Week 26206.351 pg/ml
Darapladib 160 mg EC TabletMean sCD40L Levels as Circulating Biomarkers Associated With Inflammatory Burden at Week 26 and Week 52Week 52254.200 pg/ml
Comparison: Placebo vs Darapladib 160 mg EC tablet once daily at Week 26p-value: 0.19695% CI: [-7.204, 43.632]ANCOVA
Comparison: Placebo vs Darapladib 160 mg EC tablet once daily at Week 52p-value: 0.02495% CI: [4.355, 83.997]ANCOVA

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026