Skip to content

Phase 2 Study of Gemcitabine or Gemcitabine + Enzastaurin in Participants With Advanced or Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer

A Randomized, Open-Label Phase 2 Study of 2 Regimens, Gemcitabine Plus Enzastaurin and Single-Agent Gemcitabine, in Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00267020
Enrollment
130
Registered
2005-12-20
Start date
2005-12-31
Completion date
2008-05-31
Last updated
2020-08-31

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pancreatic Neoplasm

Brief summary

The purpose of this research study is to determine the effects and toxicity of gemcitabine alone or gemcitabine plus enzastaurin in participants with pancreatic cancer.

Interventions

DRUGenzastaurin

1200 milligrams (mg) loading dose then 500 mg, orally, daily, six 28-day cycles

DRUGgemcitabine

1000 milligrams/square meter (mg/m\^2), intravenously on Days 1, 8 and 15 per cycle, six 28-day cycles

Sponsors

Eli Lilly and Company
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Diagnosis of adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. * Pretreatment tumor specimen must be available. * No prior chemotherapy immunotherapy, biological therapy, or hormonal therapy for pancreatic cancer, including 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) with radiation therapy. * Prior radiation allowed. * Ability to stop some types of anti-seizure medicines within 14 days of enrollment.

Exclusion criteria

* Endocrine pancreatic tumor or ampullary cancer. * Central Nervous System (CNS) metastases. * Inability to swallow tablets. * 10% or greater weight loss over the 6 weeks before study entry.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Overall Survival (OS)Randomization to the date of death from any cause up to 27.7 monthsOS was the duration from randomization to death. OS was censored at the last contact for participants who were alive, at the cut-off date.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Progression Free Survival (PFS)Randomization to measured PD or death from any cause up to 21.6 monthsPFS was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the first date of documented progressive disease (PD) or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. PFS was censored at the date of the last assessment visit for participants who were still alive at data cut-off and who had not had documented progressive disease. Participants who started a new treatment before progression were censored as of the date of the start of new treatment.
Duration of ResponseTime of response to PD or death from any cause up to 19.9 monthsThe duration of a complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) was defined, using the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST v1.0) criteria, as the time from first objective status assessment of CR or PR to the first time of disease progression or death as a result of any cause. Using the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST V1.0) criteria, CR was defined as the disappearance of all tumor lesions. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter (LD) of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of LD. Duration of response was censored at the date of the last assessment visit for responders who were still alive at data cut-off and had no documented progressive disease (PD).
Change in Scores From Baseline (Improved, Stable or Worsened) to End of Study in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Hepatobiliary Version 4 ( FACT-Hep v.4) (Quality of Life (QOL))Baseline through end of study up to 27.7 monthsFACT-Hep consists of 45 items in five subscales (1) physical well-being (PWB) score rage 0 -28; (2) social well-being (SWB) score range 0-28; (3) emotional well-being (EWB) score range 0-24; (4) functional well-being (FWB) score range 0-28; and (5) the hepatobiliary cancer subscale (HCS) Score range 0-72. The Trial Outcomes Index (TOI) is the sum of the PWB, FWB and Hep subscales with a scores range of 0 to 128. The Total FACT-Hep score was the sum of all questions with a scores range of 0 to 180. The Total FACT-G score was the sum of the 27 questions in the PWB, SFWB, EWB and FWB with a scores range of 0 to 108. The FACT-Hep Symptoms Index with 8 key questions and scores range of 0 to 32 from the Hep Subscale. Higher score in sub-score or total score indicates better QOL and better health state. Participants were classified as Improved if they had positive change from baseline, Worsened if they had negative change from baseline, and Stable otherwise.
Percentage of Participants With Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR) (Response Rate)Randomization to measured progressive disease (PD) up to 19.9 monthsResponse rate was defined as percentage of responders (best study response recorded as CR or PR) from the qualified number of participants for tumor response analysis. Response defined using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST, v1.0) criteria: CR was disappearance of all target lesions for at least 4 weeks. PR was at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter (LD) of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of LD. Percentage of participants was calculated as: (The number of responders with CR or PR/ The number of participants qualified for tumor response analysis) × 100.
Relationship of Steady-state Drug Levels to Best Overall Response of Complete Response (CR), Partial Response (PR), or Stable Disease (SD) (Disease Control)Beginning of treatment up to 27.7 monthsThe overall disease control rate was calculated as percent of participants with overall response of complete response (CR), partial response (PR) or stable disease (SD) over number of per-protocol population. Using the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST v1.0) criteria, CR: disappearance of all target and non-target lesions; PR: as at least a 30% decrease in sum of longest diameter (LD) of target lesions; progressive disease (PD) was defined as at least 20% increase in sum of LD of target lesions; SD: small changes that did not meet above criteria. Participants were categorized into 2 groups based on their steady state drug levels of Enzastaurin (total analyte=enzastaurin + LSN326020 \[metabolite\]): participants below the median and participants above the median \[2754.521 nanomoles per liter (nmol/l)\]. The steady state drug levels and clinical outcomes were not evaluated for the Gemcitabine only group.
Carbohydrate Antigen 19-9 (CA 19-9) Concentration in the BloodCycles 1 to 6, and post-treatment (up to 27.7 months)CA19-9 is a tumor biomarker which was measured in the blood to assess the effect of treatment with enzastaurin.
Number of Participants Experiencing Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and Adverse Events (AEs) (Toxicity)Baseline through study completion (Up To 27.7 Months)Clinically significant events were defined as SAEs and other non-serious adverse events (AEs). Participants who died due to progressive disease (PD), AEs while on treatment or died during the 30 day post-treatment are included. A summary of SAEs and other non-serious AEs regardless of causality is located in the Reported Adverse Events module.
Relationship of Steady-State Drug Levels to Clinical Outcomes of Overall Survival (OS)Randomization to date of death from any cause up to 27.7 monthsOS was the duration from randomization to death from any cause. For participants who were alive at data cut-off, OS was censored at the last contact. Participants were categorized into 2 groups based on their steady state drug levels of Enzastaurin (total analyte=enzastaurin + LSN326020 \[metabolite\]): those participants below the median and those participants above the median \[2786.042 nanomoles per /liter (nmol/l)\]. The steady state drug levels and clinical outcomes were not evaluated for the Gemcitabine only treatment group.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

Participant flow reports those participants who discontinued from study drug.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Enzastaurin+Gemcitabine
Enzastaurin: 1200 milligrams (mg) administered orally (as three 400-mg doses) after a meal on Day 1, then 500 mg orally, daily (as five 100-mg tablets) after lunch on Days 2 to 28 in Cycle 1, then 500 mg orally, daily (as five 100-mg tablets) after lunch on Days 1 to 28 in Cycle 2 and later. Gemcitabine: 1000 milligrams/square meter (mg/m\^2) administered intravenously on Days 1, 8 and 15 of each 28-day cycle.
86
Gemcitabine
Gemcitabine: 1000 mg/m\^2 administered intravenously on Days 1, 8 and 15 of each 28-day cycle.
44
Total130

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event225
Overall StudyDeath21
Overall StudyDisease Progression3925
Overall StudyOther12
Overall StudyPhysician Decision32
Overall StudySponsor Request10
Overall StudyUnrelated Complication11
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject177

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicEnzastaurin+GemcitabineGemcitabineTotal
Age, Continuous68.3 years64.1 years67.6 years
Body Surface Area (BSA)1.8 square meter (m^2)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.24
1.9 square meter (m^2)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.21
1.8 square meter (m^2)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.23
Current Stage
Stage IIB
1 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Current Stage
Stage III
7 Participants5 Participants12 Participants
Current Stage
Stage IV
78 Participants38 Participants116 Participants
Diagnosis Stage
Stage IIA
3 Participants0 Participants3 Participants
Diagnosis Stage
Stage IIB
4 Participants2 Participants6 Participants
Diagnosis Stage
Stage III
7 Participants7 Participants14 Participants
Diagnosis Stage
Stage IV
72 Participants35 Participants107 Participants
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status
0 - Fully Active
36 Participants16 Participants52 Participants
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status
1 - Ambulatory, Restricted Strenuous Activity
43 Participants25 Participants68 Participants
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status
2 - Ambulatory, No Work Activities
7 Participants3 Participants10 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
9 Participants3 Participants12 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
77 Participants41 Participants118 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
1 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
7 Participants5 Participants12 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Hispanic
9 Participants3 Participants12 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
69 Participants35 Participants104 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
86 Participants44 Participants130 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
40 Participants12 Participants52 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
46 Participants32 Participants78 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
80 / 8238 / 39
serious
Total, serious adverse events
49 / 8223 / 39

Outcome results

Primary

Overall Survival (OS)

OS was the duration from randomization to death. OS was censored at the last contact for participants who were alive, at the cut-off date.

Time frame: Randomization to the date of death from any cause up to 27.7 months

Population: Intent-to -treat (ITT) population: All randomized participants. Participants censored: Enzastaurin+Gemcitabine = 17; Gemcitabine = 11.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Enzastaurin+GemcitabineOverall Survival (OS)5.6 months
GemcitabineOverall Survival (OS)5.1 months
Secondary

Carbohydrate Antigen 19-9 (CA 19-9) Concentration in the Blood

CA19-9 is a tumor biomarker which was measured in the blood to assess the effect of treatment with enzastaurin.

Time frame: Cycles 1 to 6, and post-treatment (up to 27.7 months)

Population: Safety population: All randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Enzastaurin+GemcitabineCarbohydrate Antigen 19-9 (CA 19-9) Concentration in the BloodCycle 131708.5 kilo units/liter (kU/L)Standard Deviation 134178
Enzastaurin+GemcitabineCarbohydrate Antigen 19-9 (CA 19-9) Concentration in the BloodCycle 212828.4 kilo units/liter (kU/L)Standard Deviation 33051.54
Enzastaurin+GemcitabineCarbohydrate Antigen 19-9 (CA 19-9) Concentration in the BloodCycle 324709.5 kilo units/liter (kU/L)Standard Deviation 114098.2
Enzastaurin+GemcitabineCarbohydrate Antigen 19-9 (CA 19-9) Concentration in the BloodCycle 437261.0 kilo units/liter (kU/L)Standard Deviation 168939.81
Enzastaurin+GemcitabineCarbohydrate Antigen 19-9 (CA 19-9) Concentration in the BloodCycle 5392.3 kilo units/liter (kU/L)Standard Deviation 744.91
Enzastaurin+GemcitabineCarbohydrate Antigen 19-9 (CA 19-9) Concentration in the BloodCycle 6600.9 kilo units/liter (kU/L)Standard Deviation 1268.9
Enzastaurin+GemcitabineCarbohydrate Antigen 19-9 (CA 19-9) Concentration in the BloodPost-treatment 1st visit19420.5 kilo units/liter (kU/L)Standard Deviation 45867.95
Enzastaurin+GemcitabineCarbohydrate Antigen 19-9 (CA 19-9) Concentration in the BloodPost-treatment 2nd visit19557.7 kilo units/liter (kU/L)Standard Deviation 32615.58
GemcitabineCarbohydrate Antigen 19-9 (CA 19-9) Concentration in the BloodPost-treatment 2nd visit93955.9 kilo units/liter (kU/L)Standard Deviation 176684.42
GemcitabineCarbohydrate Antigen 19-9 (CA 19-9) Concentration in the BloodCycle 112038.6 kilo units/liter (kU/L)Standard Deviation 26659.5
GemcitabineCarbohydrate Antigen 19-9 (CA 19-9) Concentration in the BloodCycle 5403.1 kilo units/liter (kU/L)Standard Deviation 541.91
GemcitabineCarbohydrate Antigen 19-9 (CA 19-9) Concentration in the BloodCycle 240764.9 kilo units/liter (kU/L)Standard Deviation 143995.67
GemcitabineCarbohydrate Antigen 19-9 (CA 19-9) Concentration in the BloodPost-treatment 1st visit11351.3 kilo units/liter (kU/L)Standard Deviation 23890.66
GemcitabineCarbohydrate Antigen 19-9 (CA 19-9) Concentration in the BloodCycle 31573.0 kilo units/liter (kU/L)Standard Deviation 2811.74
GemcitabineCarbohydrate Antigen 19-9 (CA 19-9) Concentration in the BloodCycle 6938.5 kilo units/liter (kU/L)Standard Deviation 1542.34
GemcitabineCarbohydrate Antigen 19-9 (CA 19-9) Concentration in the BloodCycle 41102.7 kilo units/liter (kU/L)Standard Deviation 1547.67
Secondary

Change in Scores From Baseline (Improved, Stable or Worsened) to End of Study in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Hepatobiliary Version 4 ( FACT-Hep v.4) (Quality of Life (QOL))

FACT-Hep consists of 45 items in five subscales (1) physical well-being (PWB) score rage 0 -28; (2) social well-being (SWB) score range 0-28; (3) emotional well-being (EWB) score range 0-24; (4) functional well-being (FWB) score range 0-28; and (5) the hepatobiliary cancer subscale (HCS) Score range 0-72. The Trial Outcomes Index (TOI) is the sum of the PWB, FWB and Hep subscales with a scores range of 0 to 128. The Total FACT-Hep score was the sum of all questions with a scores range of 0 to 180. The Total FACT-G score was the sum of the 27 questions in the PWB, SFWB, EWB and FWB with a scores range of 0 to 108. The FACT-Hep Symptoms Index with 8 key questions and scores range of 0 to 32 from the Hep Subscale. Higher score in sub-score or total score indicates better QOL and better health state. Participants were classified as Improved if they had positive change from baseline, Worsened if they had negative change from baseline, and Stable otherwise.

Time frame: Baseline through end of study up to 27.7 months

Population: All randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had data for FACT-Hep questionnaire.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Enzastaurin+GemcitabineChange in Scores From Baseline (Improved, Stable or Worsened) to End of Study in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Hepatobiliary Version 4 ( FACT-Hep v.4) (Quality of Life (QOL))Physical well-being- Stable0.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.16
Enzastaurin+GemcitabineChange in Scores From Baseline (Improved, Stable or Worsened) to End of Study in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Hepatobiliary Version 4 ( FACT-Hep v.4) (Quality of Life (QOL))Total FACT-Hep score- Improved30.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.81
Enzastaurin+GemcitabineChange in Scores From Baseline (Improved, Stable or Worsened) to End of Study in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Hepatobiliary Version 4 ( FACT-Hep v.4) (Quality of Life (QOL))Functional well-being- Worsened-10.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.37
Enzastaurin+GemcitabineChange in Scores From Baseline (Improved, Stable or Worsened) to End of Study in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Hepatobiliary Version 4 ( FACT-Hep v.4) (Quality of Life (QOL))Total FACT-Hep score- Stable-1.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.65
Enzastaurin+GemcitabineChange in Scores From Baseline (Improved, Stable or Worsened) to End of Study in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Hepatobiliary Version 4 ( FACT-Hep v.4) (Quality of Life (QOL))Social well-being- Worsened-6.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.8
Enzastaurin+GemcitabineChange in Scores From Baseline (Improved, Stable or Worsened) to End of Study in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Hepatobiliary Version 4 ( FACT-Hep v.4) (Quality of Life (QOL))Total FACT-G-score- Improved19.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.63
Enzastaurin+GemcitabineChange in Scores From Baseline (Improved, Stable or Worsened) to End of Study in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Hepatobiliary Version 4 ( FACT-Hep v.4) (Quality of Life (QOL))Physical well-being- Improved7.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.48
Enzastaurin+GemcitabineChange in Scores From Baseline (Improved, Stable or Worsened) to End of Study in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Hepatobiliary Version 4 ( FACT-Hep v.4) (Quality of Life (QOL))Total FACT-G-score- Stable-0.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.56
Enzastaurin+GemcitabineChange in Scores From Baseline (Improved, Stable or Worsened) to End of Study in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Hepatobiliary Version 4 ( FACT-Hep v.4) (Quality of Life (QOL))Social well-being- Improved3.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.64
Enzastaurin+GemcitabineChange in Scores From Baseline (Improved, Stable or Worsened) to End of Study in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Hepatobiliary Version 4 ( FACT-Hep v.4) (Quality of Life (QOL))Total FACT-G-score- Worsened-20.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.59
Enzastaurin+GemcitabineChange in Scores From Baseline (Improved, Stable or Worsened) to End of Study in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Hepatobiliary Version 4 ( FACT-Hep v.4) (Quality of Life (QOL))Hepatobiliary cancer subscale- Stable0.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3
Enzastaurin+GemcitabineChange in Scores From Baseline (Improved, Stable or Worsened) to End of Study in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Hepatobiliary Version 4 ( FACT-Hep v.4) (Quality of Life (QOL))Emotional well-being- Improved6.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.76
Enzastaurin+GemcitabineChange in Scores From Baseline (Improved, Stable or Worsened) to End of Study in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Hepatobiliary Version 4 ( FACT-Hep v.4) (Quality of Life (QOL))FACT Hep Symptoms Index- Stable0.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.45
Enzastaurin+GemcitabineChange in Scores From Baseline (Improved, Stable or Worsened) to End of Study in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Hepatobiliary Version 4 ( FACT-Hep v.4) (Quality of Life (QOL))Physical well-being- Worsened-10.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.08
Enzastaurin+GemcitabineChange in Scores From Baseline (Improved, Stable or Worsened) to End of Study in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Hepatobiliary Version 4 ( FACT-Hep v.4) (Quality of Life (QOL))FACT Hep Symptoms Index- Worsened-7.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.31
Enzastaurin+GemcitabineChange in Scores From Baseline (Improved, Stable or Worsened) to End of Study in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Hepatobiliary Version 4 ( FACT-Hep v.4) (Quality of Life (QOL))Total Outcome Index- Improved21.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.2
Enzastaurin+GemcitabineChange in Scores From Baseline (Improved, Stable or Worsened) to End of Study in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Hepatobiliary Version 4 ( FACT-Hep v.4) (Quality of Life (QOL))FACT Hep Symptoms Index- Improved7.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.95
Enzastaurin+GemcitabineChange in Scores From Baseline (Improved, Stable or Worsened) to End of Study in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Hepatobiliary Version 4 ( FACT-Hep v.4) (Quality of Life (QOL))Emotional well-being- Worsened-5.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.57
Enzastaurin+GemcitabineChange in Scores From Baseline (Improved, Stable or Worsened) to End of Study in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Hepatobiliary Version 4 ( FACT-Hep v.4) (Quality of Life (QOL))Emotional well-being- Stable0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.29
Enzastaurin+GemcitabineChange in Scores From Baseline (Improved, Stable or Worsened) to End of Study in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Hepatobiliary Version 4 ( FACT-Hep v.4) (Quality of Life (QOL))Total outcome index- Stable-1.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.4
Enzastaurin+GemcitabineChange in Scores From Baseline (Improved, Stable or Worsened) to End of Study in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Hepatobiliary Version 4 ( FACT-Hep v.4) (Quality of Life (QOL))Social well-being- Stable0.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.06
Enzastaurin+GemcitabineChange in Scores From Baseline (Improved, Stable or Worsened) to End of Study in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Hepatobiliary Version 4 ( FACT-Hep v.4) (Quality of Life (QOL))Functional well-being- Improved6.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.63
Enzastaurin+GemcitabineChange in Scores From Baseline (Improved, Stable or Worsened) to End of Study in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Hepatobiliary Version 4 ( FACT-Hep v.4) (Quality of Life (QOL))Functional well-being- Stable-0.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.4
Enzastaurin+GemcitabineChange in Scores From Baseline (Improved, Stable or Worsened) to End of Study in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Hepatobiliary Version 4 ( FACT-Hep v.4) (Quality of Life (QOL))Hepatobiliary cancer subscale- Improved12.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.67
Enzastaurin+GemcitabineChange in Scores From Baseline (Improved, Stable or Worsened) to End of Study in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Hepatobiliary Version 4 ( FACT-Hep v.4) (Quality of Life (QOL))Hepatobiliary cancer subscale- Worsened-14.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.7
Enzastaurin+GemcitabineChange in Scores From Baseline (Improved, Stable or Worsened) to End of Study in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Hepatobiliary Version 4 ( FACT-Hep v.4) (Quality of Life (QOL))Total outcome index- Worsened-35.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.03
Enzastaurin+GemcitabineChange in Scores From Baseline (Improved, Stable or Worsened) to End of Study in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Hepatobiliary Version 4 ( FACT-Hep v.4) (Quality of Life (QOL))Total FACT-Hep score- Worsened-37.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.71
GemcitabineChange in Scores From Baseline (Improved, Stable or Worsened) to End of Study in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Hepatobiliary Version 4 ( FACT-Hep v.4) (Quality of Life (QOL))Total FACT-G-score- Improved24.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.95
GemcitabineChange in Scores From Baseline (Improved, Stable or Worsened) to End of Study in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Hepatobiliary Version 4 ( FACT-Hep v.4) (Quality of Life (QOL))Physical well-being- Improved6.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.71
GemcitabineChange in Scores From Baseline (Improved, Stable or Worsened) to End of Study in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Hepatobiliary Version 4 ( FACT-Hep v.4) (Quality of Life (QOL))Physical well-being- Worsened-7.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.96
GemcitabineChange in Scores From Baseline (Improved, Stable or Worsened) to End of Study in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Hepatobiliary Version 4 ( FACT-Hep v.4) (Quality of Life (QOL))Social well-being- Improved4.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.1
GemcitabineChange in Scores From Baseline (Improved, Stable or Worsened) to End of Study in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Hepatobiliary Version 4 ( FACT-Hep v.4) (Quality of Life (QOL))Social well-being- Stable-0.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.21
GemcitabineChange in Scores From Baseline (Improved, Stable or Worsened) to End of Study in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Hepatobiliary Version 4 ( FACT-Hep v.4) (Quality of Life (QOL))Social well-being- Worsened-5.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.66
GemcitabineChange in Scores From Baseline (Improved, Stable or Worsened) to End of Study in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Hepatobiliary Version 4 ( FACT-Hep v.4) (Quality of Life (QOL))Emotional well-being- Improved6.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.79
GemcitabineChange in Scores From Baseline (Improved, Stable or Worsened) to End of Study in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Hepatobiliary Version 4 ( FACT-Hep v.4) (Quality of Life (QOL))Functional well-being- Improved6.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.73
GemcitabineChange in Scores From Baseline (Improved, Stable or Worsened) to End of Study in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Hepatobiliary Version 4 ( FACT-Hep v.4) (Quality of Life (QOL))Functional well-being- Stable-1.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.9
GemcitabineChange in Scores From Baseline (Improved, Stable or Worsened) to End of Study in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Hepatobiliary Version 4 ( FACT-Hep v.4) (Quality of Life (QOL))Functional well-being- Worsened-8.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.42
GemcitabineChange in Scores From Baseline (Improved, Stable or Worsened) to End of Study in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Hepatobiliary Version 4 ( FACT-Hep v.4) (Quality of Life (QOL))Hepatobiliary cancer subscale- Improved12.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.2
GemcitabineChange in Scores From Baseline (Improved, Stable or Worsened) to End of Study in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Hepatobiliary Version 4 ( FACT-Hep v.4) (Quality of Life (QOL))Hepatobiliary cancer subscale- Stable0.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.78
GemcitabineChange in Scores From Baseline (Improved, Stable or Worsened) to End of Study in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Hepatobiliary Version 4 ( FACT-Hep v.4) (Quality of Life (QOL))Hepatobiliary cancer subscale- Worsened-10.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.32
GemcitabineChange in Scores From Baseline (Improved, Stable or Worsened) to End of Study in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Hepatobiliary Version 4 ( FACT-Hep v.4) (Quality of Life (QOL))Total Outcome Index- Improved19.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.49
GemcitabineChange in Scores From Baseline (Improved, Stable or Worsened) to End of Study in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Hepatobiliary Version 4 ( FACT-Hep v.4) (Quality of Life (QOL))Total outcome index- Stable-1.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.76
GemcitabineChange in Scores From Baseline (Improved, Stable or Worsened) to End of Study in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Hepatobiliary Version 4 ( FACT-Hep v.4) (Quality of Life (QOL))Total outcome index- Worsened-23.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.88
GemcitabineChange in Scores From Baseline (Improved, Stable or Worsened) to End of Study in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Hepatobiliary Version 4 ( FACT-Hep v.4) (Quality of Life (QOL))Total FACT-Hep score- Improved27.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.91
GemcitabineChange in Scores From Baseline (Improved, Stable or Worsened) to End of Study in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Hepatobiliary Version 4 ( FACT-Hep v.4) (Quality of Life (QOL))Total FACT-Hep score- Worsened-26.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.26
GemcitabineChange in Scores From Baseline (Improved, Stable or Worsened) to End of Study in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Hepatobiliary Version 4 ( FACT-Hep v.4) (Quality of Life (QOL))Total FACT-G-score- Stable-0.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.17
GemcitabineChange in Scores From Baseline (Improved, Stable or Worsened) to End of Study in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Hepatobiliary Version 4 ( FACT-Hep v.4) (Quality of Life (QOL))Total FACT-G-score- Worsened-21.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.75
GemcitabineChange in Scores From Baseline (Improved, Stable or Worsened) to End of Study in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Hepatobiliary Version 4 ( FACT-Hep v.4) (Quality of Life (QOL))FACT Hep Symptoms Index- Improved6.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.5
GemcitabineChange in Scores From Baseline (Improved, Stable or Worsened) to End of Study in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Hepatobiliary Version 4 ( FACT-Hep v.4) (Quality of Life (QOL))FACT Hep Symptoms Index- Stable0.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.85
GemcitabineChange in Scores From Baseline (Improved, Stable or Worsened) to End of Study in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Hepatobiliary Version 4 ( FACT-Hep v.4) (Quality of Life (QOL))FACT Hep Symptoms Index- Worsened-7.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.16
GemcitabineChange in Scores From Baseline (Improved, Stable or Worsened) to End of Study in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Hepatobiliary Version 4 ( FACT-Hep v.4) (Quality of Life (QOL))Physical well-being- Stable0.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.8
GemcitabineChange in Scores From Baseline (Improved, Stable or Worsened) to End of Study in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Hepatobiliary Version 4 ( FACT-Hep v.4) (Quality of Life (QOL))Emotional well-being- Stable-0.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.36
GemcitabineChange in Scores From Baseline (Improved, Stable or Worsened) to End of Study in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Hepatobiliary Version 4 ( FACT-Hep v.4) (Quality of Life (QOL))Emotional well-being- Worsened-8.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.15
GemcitabineChange in Scores From Baseline (Improved, Stable or Worsened) to End of Study in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Hepatobiliary Version 4 ( FACT-Hep v.4) (Quality of Life (QOL))Total FACT-Hep score- Stable0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.19
Secondary

Duration of Response

The duration of a complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) was defined, using the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST v1.0) criteria, as the time from first objective status assessment of CR or PR to the first time of disease progression or death as a result of any cause. Using the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST V1.0) criteria, CR was defined as the disappearance of all tumor lesions. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter (LD) of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of LD. Duration of response was censored at the date of the last assessment visit for responders who were still alive at data cut-off and had no documented progressive disease (PD).

Time frame: Time of response to PD or death from any cause up to 19.9 months

Population: Participants in the Per Protocol population with a CR or PR: With histological or cytological diagnosis of locally advanced adenocarcinoma of the pancreas; no concurrent systemic chemotherapy; presence of measurable disease at baseline; and treatment with at least 1 dose of study drug. Censored: Enzastaurin+Gemcitabine = 1; Gemcitabine = 0.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Enzastaurin+GemcitabineDuration of Response4.6 months
GemcitabineDuration of Response9.2 months
Secondary

Number of Participants Experiencing Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and Adverse Events (AEs) (Toxicity)

Clinically significant events were defined as SAEs and other non-serious adverse events (AEs). Participants who died due to progressive disease (PD), AEs while on treatment or died during the 30 day post-treatment are included. A summary of SAEs and other non-serious AEs regardless of causality is located in the Reported Adverse Events module.

Time frame: Baseline through study completion (Up To 27.7 Months)

Population: Safety population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Enzastaurin+GemcitabineNumber of Participants Experiencing Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and Adverse Events (AEs) (Toxicity)SAEs49 Participants
Enzastaurin+GemcitabineNumber of Participants Experiencing Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and Adverse Events (AEs) (Toxicity)Deaths due to AEs4 Participants
Enzastaurin+GemcitabineNumber of Participants Experiencing Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and Adverse Events (AEs) (Toxicity)Deaths due to PD3 Participants
Enzastaurin+GemcitabineNumber of Participants Experiencing Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and Adverse Events (AEs) (Toxicity)Deaths within 30-days after treatment3 Participants
Enzastaurin+GemcitabineNumber of Participants Experiencing Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and Adverse Events (AEs) (Toxicity)Non-serious AEs80 Participants
GemcitabineNumber of Participants Experiencing Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and Adverse Events (AEs) (Toxicity)Deaths within 30-days after treatment1 Participants
GemcitabineNumber of Participants Experiencing Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and Adverse Events (AEs) (Toxicity)Non-serious AEs38 Participants
GemcitabineNumber of Participants Experiencing Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and Adverse Events (AEs) (Toxicity)SAEs23 Participants
GemcitabineNumber of Participants Experiencing Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and Adverse Events (AEs) (Toxicity)Deaths due to PD1 Participants
GemcitabineNumber of Participants Experiencing Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and Adverse Events (AEs) (Toxicity)Deaths due to AEs1 Participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR) (Response Rate)

Response rate was defined as percentage of responders (best study response recorded as CR or PR) from the qualified number of participants for tumor response analysis. Response defined using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST, v1.0) criteria: CR was disappearance of all target lesions for at least 4 weeks. PR was at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter (LD) of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of LD. Percentage of participants was calculated as: (The number of responders with CR or PR/ The number of participants qualified for tumor response analysis) × 100.

Time frame: Randomization to measured progressive disease (PD) up to 19.9 months

Population: Per Protocol Population: Randomized participants who had: 1) histological or cytological diagnosis of locally advanced (Stage II, III) or metastatic (Stage IV) adenocarcinoma of the pancreas; 2) no concurrent systemic chemotherapy; 3) presence of measurable disease at baseline; and 4) received at least 1 dose of study drug.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Enzastaurin+GemcitabinePercentage of Participants With Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR) (Response Rate)CR1.2 percentage of participants
Enzastaurin+GemcitabinePercentage of Participants With Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR) (Response Rate)PR7.4 percentage of participants
GemcitabinePercentage of Participants With Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR) (Response Rate)CR0 percentage of participants
GemcitabinePercentage of Participants With Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR) (Response Rate)PR5.3 percentage of participants
Secondary

Progression Free Survival (PFS)

PFS was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the first date of documented progressive disease (PD) or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. PFS was censored at the date of the last assessment visit for participants who were still alive at data cut-off and who had not had documented progressive disease. Participants who started a new treatment before progression were censored as of the date of the start of new treatment.

Time frame: Randomization to measured PD or death from any cause up to 21.6 months

Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population: All randomized participants. Participants censored: Enzastaurin+Gemcitabine = 21; Gemcitabine = 10.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Enzastaurin+GemcitabineProgression Free Survival (PFS)3.4 months
GemcitabineProgression Free Survival (PFS)3.0 months
Secondary

Relationship of Steady-state Drug Levels to Best Overall Response of Complete Response (CR), Partial Response (PR), or Stable Disease (SD) (Disease Control)

The overall disease control rate was calculated as percent of participants with overall response of complete response (CR), partial response (PR) or stable disease (SD) over number of per-protocol population. Using the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST v1.0) criteria, CR: disappearance of all target and non-target lesions; PR: as at least a 30% decrease in sum of longest diameter (LD) of target lesions; progressive disease (PD) was defined as at least 20% increase in sum of LD of target lesions; SD: small changes that did not meet above criteria. Participants were categorized into 2 groups based on their steady state drug levels of Enzastaurin (total analyte=enzastaurin + LSN326020 \[metabolite\]): participants below the median and participants above the median \[2754.521 nanomoles per liter (nmol/l)\]. The steady state drug levels and clinical outcomes were not evaluated for the Gemcitabine only group.

Time frame: Beginning of treatment up to 27.7 months

Population: Randomized participants who had: 1) Histological or cytological diagnosis of locally advanced (Stage II, III) or metastatic (Stage IV) adenocarcinoma of the pancreas; 2) no concurrent systemic chemotherapy; 3) presence of measurable disease at baseline; and 4) received at least 1 dose of study drug and had data for overall response.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Enzastaurin+GemcitabineRelationship of Steady-state Drug Levels to Best Overall Response of Complete Response (CR), Partial Response (PR), or Stable Disease (SD) (Disease Control)CR (Below median)3.6 percentage of participants
Enzastaurin+GemcitabineRelationship of Steady-state Drug Levels to Best Overall Response of Complete Response (CR), Partial Response (PR), or Stable Disease (SD) (Disease Control)CR (Above median)0.0 percentage of participants
Enzastaurin+GemcitabineRelationship of Steady-state Drug Levels to Best Overall Response of Complete Response (CR), Partial Response (PR), or Stable Disease (SD) (Disease Control)PR (Above median)3.6 percentage of participants
Enzastaurin+GemcitabineRelationship of Steady-state Drug Levels to Best Overall Response of Complete Response (CR), Partial Response (PR), or Stable Disease (SD) (Disease Control)SD (Below median)57.1 percentage of participants
Enzastaurin+GemcitabineRelationship of Steady-state Drug Levels to Best Overall Response of Complete Response (CR), Partial Response (PR), or Stable Disease (SD) (Disease Control)SD (Above median)39.3 percentage of participants
Enzastaurin+GemcitabineRelationship of Steady-state Drug Levels to Best Overall Response of Complete Response (CR), Partial Response (PR), or Stable Disease (SD) (Disease Control)PD (Below median)14.3 percentage of participants
Enzastaurin+GemcitabineRelationship of Steady-state Drug Levels to Best Overall Response of Complete Response (CR), Partial Response (PR), or Stable Disease (SD) (Disease Control)PD (Above median)32.1 percentage of participants
Enzastaurin+GemcitabineRelationship of Steady-state Drug Levels to Best Overall Response of Complete Response (CR), Partial Response (PR), or Stable Disease (SD) (Disease Control)Disease Control (Above median)42.9 percentage of participants
Enzastaurin+GemcitabineRelationship of Steady-state Drug Levels to Best Overall Response of Complete Response (CR), Partial Response (PR), or Stable Disease (SD) (Disease Control)PR (Below median)17.9 percentage of participants
Enzastaurin+GemcitabineRelationship of Steady-state Drug Levels to Best Overall Response of Complete Response (CR), Partial Response (PR), or Stable Disease (SD) (Disease Control)Disease Control (Below median)78.6 percentage of participants
Secondary

Relationship of Steady-State Drug Levels to Clinical Outcomes of Overall Survival (OS)

OS was the duration from randomization to death from any cause. For participants who were alive at data cut-off, OS was censored at the last contact. Participants were categorized into 2 groups based on their steady state drug levels of Enzastaurin (total analyte=enzastaurin + LSN326020 \[metabolite\]): those participants below the median and those participants above the median \[2786.042 nanomoles per /liter (nmol/l)\]. The steady state drug levels and clinical outcomes were not evaluated for the Gemcitabine only treatment group.

Time frame: Randomization to date of death from any cause up to 27.7 months

Population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. Participants censored: Below median = 4; Above median =4.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Enzastaurin+GemcitabineRelationship of Steady-State Drug Levels to Clinical Outcomes of Overall Survival (OS)Below median7.2 months
Enzastaurin+GemcitabineRelationship of Steady-State Drug Levels to Clinical Outcomes of Overall Survival (OS)Above median5.6 months

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026