Breast Cancer
Conditions
Brief summary
This is an open-label, multinational, randomized, multicenter trial designed to compare pegylated liposomal doxorubicin with capecitabine as first line chemotherapy of metastatic breast cancer. The primary objective of the study is to compare the time to disease progression, although overall response rates, overall survival, quality of life, time to treatment failure, and safety and tolerability will also be assessed.
Interventions
DRUGPegylated liposomal doxorubicin (SCH 200746)
pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (50 mg/m\^2 q 28 days) was administered intravenously until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity
DRUGCapecitabine
capecitabine (1250 mg/m\^2 BID x 14 days q 21 days) in tablets of 150 mg and 500 mg was administered orally, until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity
Sponsors
Essex Pharma GmbH
Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* Patients must be female. * Patients must have metastatic disease of a cytological or histological confirmed breast cancer. * Patients must be 18 years or older. * Patients should have evaluable disease (at least uni-dimensionally measurable lesion according to the RECIST criteria in at least one site that has not been irradiated), however, patients who only have non-measurable/evaluable disease are not excluded. Also patients with only bone metastasis are not excluded. * Patients must have an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) 0-2. * Patients must have a sufficient life expectancy to be treated with chemotherapy. * Patients must be willing and able to complete study questionnaires. * Patients must have adequate renal function as evidenced by serum creatinine \<=1.5 mg/dL, or a creatinine clearance of \>=45 mL/min (if serum creatinine is \> 1.5 mg/dL but \<= 1.8 mg/dL). * Patients must have adequate bone marrow function as evidenced by leukocyte count greater than 3.5 g/L, hemoglobin \>=9.0 g/dL, and platelet count \>=100x10\^9/L. * Patients must have adequate liver function as evidenced by bilirubin of \<=1.5 times the upper limits of normal (ULN) and alkaline phosphatase \<=3 times, ULN unless related to liver metastasis. * Patients must have Sodium and Potassium values within normal limits. * Patients whose clinical condition (co-morbidity) allows a treatment with monotherapy or who expressed their wish to be treated with monotherapy. * Patients must have signed an informed consent document indicating that they understand the purpose of and procedures required for the study and are willing to participate in the study.
Exclusion criteria
* History of receiving prior chemotherapy in the metastatic setting (Note: patients may have had hormonal therapy or chemotherapy in the adjuvant setting; patients may have received hormonal therapy in metastatic setting, patients may have received local radiotherapy). * Patients with positive estrogen- / progesterone-receptor status, where an endocrine therapy is indicated. However, patients progressing under hormonal therapy are not excluded. * Patients with known hypersensitivity to doxorubicinhydrochlorid or to any of the excipients OR known hypersensitivity to capecitabine or fluorouracil or to any of the excipients. * Patients with known DPD (dihydro pyrimidine dehydrogenase) deficiency. * Patients who are receiving a concomitant treatment with sorivudine or its chemically related analogues, such as brivudine. * Patients who are taking concomitant medications (except bisphosphonates) for metastatic disease, including hormonal therapy, radiation therapy, trastuzumab, or biologicals are also not permitted. * Patients with Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (Her-2/neu) overexpressing tumors with the most recent evaluation as the relevant result * immunologically Her2neu 3+ positive * Her2neu-2+ positive and ´Fluorescent in-situ hybridization (FISH)´ positive * History of treatment with capecitabine * History of treatment with anthracyclines in the adjuvant setting exceeding cumulative doses of anthracyclines by more than 360 mg/m\^2 doxorubicin (or equivalents, i.e. 600mg/m\^2 epirubicine). * Patients with anthracycline resistant disease are not permitted. Anthracycline resistance is defined as development of locally recurrent or metastatic disease while on adjuvant anthracycline therapy, or relapse less than 12 months after completion of anthracycline therapy. * Strong remission pressure that requires polychemotherapy with the exception of patients who are not suitable for a treatment with polychemotherapy or not accepting polychemotherapy. * Evidence of primary or metastatic malignancy involving the central nervous system unless previously treated and asymptomatic for 3 months or greater. * Patients with reduced liver functions (evidenced by bilirubin of above 1.5 times the upper limits of normal (ULN); alkaline phosphatase above 3 times ULN (except related to liver metastasis, in which case \<=5 x ULN). * Dyspnea on exertion. * History of cardiac disease, with New York Heart Association Class II or greater, or clinical evidence of congestive heart failure or myocardial infarct within less than six months or an left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) below 50%. * Woman with childbearing potential with insufficient contraception \[e.g. intra-uterine device (IUD) are regarded as sufficient\] during the study period and the six months following the last study drug application. All methods based on hormonal contraception are not permitted. * Existing pregnancy or lactation (note on pregnancy test). A negative pregnancy test for women of childbearing potential has to be in place prior randomization (Note: A pregnancy test has to be done for patients who are not postmenopausal. Postmenopausal is defined as those not having a menstrual period for 12 months in a row). * Existing doubts on ability and willingness of the subject for cooperation. * Participation of the subject at a clinical study within the last 30 days. * Participation of the subject in the same clinical study at an earlier date. * Concomitant participation in another study than the one described here. * Abuse of drugs, alcohol, or pharmaceuticals. * Any condition, whether medical or non-medical, that may interfere, in the opinion of the investigator, with aim of this study.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Time to Disease Progression (TTP) Using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) | From Day 1 (Cycle 1) until First Evidence/Diagnosis of Progressive Disease or Death | TTP was defined as the time from onset of treatment with study drug until first evidence/diagnosis of progressive disease or - in the absence of any diagnosis of progressive disease - until the participant´s death. Diagnosis of progressive disease was done according to RECIST (Version 1.0) and/or investigator assessment based on RECIST. RECIST criteria used changes in the largest diameter of target/non-target lesions. Target (measurable) lesions were up to a maximum of 5 per organ & \>20 mm by clinical imaging (\>=10 mm with spiral CT scan). Non-target lesions were all other lesions. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Participants With an Overall Response (Complete Response [CR] + Partial Response [PR]) Between PLD and Capecitabine Treatment Groups | From Day 1 (Cycle 1) until First Evidence/Diagnosis of Progressive Disease or Death | Overall responses by investigator assessment/RECIST criteria of participant responses; CR=disappearance of target/nontarget lesions + PR=30% decrease in longest diameter sum (noting baseline sum) of target lesions. RECIST used changes in the largest diameter of target/non-target lesions. Target lesions were up to a maximum of 5 per organ & \>20 mm by clinical imaging (\>=10 mm with spiral CT scan). Non-target lesions were all other lesions. Evaluation of progress was repeated every 3 months (+/-7 days) post first date of lesion measurements, in detection absence until the participant´s death. |
| Overall Survival Time in the PLD and Capecitabine Treatment Groups | From Day 1 (Cycle 1) until Death | Survival time was defined as duration time from onset of treatment with the study drug until death. |
| Time to Treatment Failure in the PLD and the Capecitabine Treatment Groups | From Day 1 (Cycle 1) until End of Treatment | Time to treatment failure was defined as the duration of time from the date of the first administration of the study drug to the date of discontinuation of the study drug for any reason. |
| Quality of Life (QoL) Measured by QoL Questionnaire (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) + Subjective Significance Questionnaire (SSQ)) | From Screening to Day 1 of every Treatment Cycle up to 12 Cycles | QoL questionnaire was an EORTC QLQ-C30 & SSQ integration. Scores on the SSQ scale ranged from 1 (very much worse) - 7 (very much better). SSQ consisted of 4 items which corresponded to core domains in the 30 Item EORTC QLQ-C30, such as improvement/deterioration in physical functioning, emotional functioning, social functioning, global QoL. Percentages were based on number of participants at each cycle & rounded to the nearest whole number. Early Withdrawal Questionnaires were obtained in 7-14 days of study drug final dose. |
Participant flow
Recruitment details
210 participants were enrolled with 105 participants randomized for treatment with PLD and 105 participants randomized for treatment with Capecitabine, of which 7 participants in the PLD group and 3 participants in the Capecitabine group were not treated.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin (PLD) PLD 50 mg/m\^2 was administered intravenously once every 28 days. Each cycle was repeated until progress or unacceptable toxicity. | 105 |
| Capecitabine Capecitabine 1250 mg/m\^2, in tablets of 150 mg and 500 mg, was administered orally twice daily (BID) for 14 consecutive days followed by a 7-day rest period. Each cycle was repeated every 21 days until progress or unacceptable toxicity. | 105 |
| Total | 210 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin (PLD) | Capecitabine | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 61.4 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.66 | 61.5 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.59 | 61.5 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.6 |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 105 Participants | 105 Participants | 210 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | — / — | — / — |
| other Total, other adverse events | 96 / 98 | 98 / 102 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 30 / 98 | 46 / 102 |
Outcome results
Primary
Time to Disease Progression (TTP) Using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST)
TTP was defined as the time from onset of treatment with study drug until first evidence/diagnosis of progressive disease or - in the absence of any diagnosis of progressive disease - until the participant´s death. Diagnosis of progressive disease was done according to RECIST (Version 1.0) and/or investigator assessment based on RECIST. RECIST criteria used changes in the largest diameter of target/non-target lesions. Target (measurable) lesions were up to a maximum of 5 per organ & \>20 mm by clinical imaging (\>=10 mm with spiral CT scan). Non-target lesions were all other lesions.
Time frame: From Day 1 (Cycle 1) until First Evidence/Diagnosis of Progressive Disease or Death
Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT): 7 in PLD group \& 3 participants in Capecitabine group were missing response assessments. TTP Population: included participants in view of major protocol violations/deviations, i.e. tumor-relevant inclusion/exclusion criteria, treatment compliance, tumor assessments by RECIST with maximum 4 month interval between assessments.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin (PLD) | Time to Disease Progression (TTP) Using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) | By Investigator Assessment (ITT) | 6.02 Months |
| Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin (PLD) | Time to Disease Progression (TTP) Using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) | By RECIST Criteria (ITT) | 6.58 Months |
| Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin (PLD) | Time to Disease Progression (TTP) Using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) | By Investigator Assessment (TTP N = 63, N = 59) | 5.85 Months |
| Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin (PLD) | Time to Disease Progression (TTP) Using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) | By RECIST Criteria (TTP N = 63, N = 59) | 6.02 Months |
| Capecitabine | Time to Disease Progression (TTP) Using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) | By RECIST Criteria (TTP N = 63, N = 59) | 6.05 Months |
| Capecitabine | Time to Disease Progression (TTP) Using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) | By Investigator Assessment (ITT) | 6.05 Months |
| Capecitabine | Time to Disease Progression (TTP) Using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) | By Investigator Assessment (TTP N = 63, N = 59) | 5.88 Months |
| Capecitabine | Time to Disease Progression (TTP) Using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) | By RECIST Criteria (ITT) | 7.10 Months |
Comparison: By Investigator Assessment of ITT Populationp-value: 0.668695% CI: [0.76, 1.54]Log Rank
Comparison: By RECIST Criteria of ITT Populationp-value: 0.447295% CI: [0.8, 1.65]Log Rank
Comparison: By Investigator Assessment of TTP Populationp-value: 0.550895% CI: [0.74, 1.77]Log Rank
Comparison: By RECIST Criteria of TTP Populationp-value: 0.408895% CI: [0.77, 1.89]Log Rank
Secondary
Number of Participants With an Overall Response (Complete Response [CR] + Partial Response [PR]) Between PLD and Capecitabine Treatment Groups
Overall responses by investigator assessment/RECIST criteria of participant responses; CR=disappearance of target/nontarget lesions + PR=30% decrease in longest diameter sum (noting baseline sum) of target lesions. RECIST used changes in the largest diameter of target/non-target lesions. Target lesions were up to a maximum of 5 per organ & \>20 mm by clinical imaging (\>=10 mm with spiral CT scan). Non-target lesions were all other lesions. Evaluation of progress was repeated every 3 months (+/-7 days) post first date of lesion measurements, in detection absence until the participant´s death.
Time frame: From Day 1 (Cycle 1) until First Evidence/Diagnosis of Progressive Disease or Death
Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population included all randomized participants.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin (PLD) | Number of Participants With an Overall Response (Complete Response [CR] + Partial Response [PR]) Between PLD and Capecitabine Treatment Groups | By Investigator Assessment - CR | 1 Participants |
| Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin (PLD) | Number of Participants With an Overall Response (Complete Response [CR] + Partial Response [PR]) Between PLD and Capecitabine Treatment Groups | By Investigator Assessment - PR | 5 Participants |
| Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin (PLD) | Number of Participants With an Overall Response (Complete Response [CR] + Partial Response [PR]) Between PLD and Capecitabine Treatment Groups | By Investigator Assessment Overall Response | 6 Participants |
| Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin (PLD) | Number of Participants With an Overall Response (Complete Response [CR] + Partial Response [PR]) Between PLD and Capecitabine Treatment Groups | By RECIST Criteria - CR | 1 Participants |
| Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin (PLD) | Number of Participants With an Overall Response (Complete Response [CR] + Partial Response [PR]) Between PLD and Capecitabine Treatment Groups | By RECIST Criteria - PR | 8 Participants |
| Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin (PLD) | Number of Participants With an Overall Response (Complete Response [CR] + Partial Response [PR]) Between PLD and Capecitabine Treatment Groups | By RECIST Criteria Overall Response | 9 Participants |
| Capecitabine | Number of Participants With an Overall Response (Complete Response [CR] + Partial Response [PR]) Between PLD and Capecitabine Treatment Groups | By RECIST Criteria - PR | 11 Participants |
| Capecitabine | Number of Participants With an Overall Response (Complete Response [CR] + Partial Response [PR]) Between PLD and Capecitabine Treatment Groups | By Investigator Assessment - CR | 0 Participants |
| Capecitabine | Number of Participants With an Overall Response (Complete Response [CR] + Partial Response [PR]) Between PLD and Capecitabine Treatment Groups | By RECIST Criteria - CR | 0 Participants |
| Capecitabine | Number of Participants With an Overall Response (Complete Response [CR] + Partial Response [PR]) Between PLD and Capecitabine Treatment Groups | By Investigator Assessment - PR | 12 Participants |
| Capecitabine | Number of Participants With an Overall Response (Complete Response [CR] + Partial Response [PR]) Between PLD and Capecitabine Treatment Groups | By RECIST Criteria Overall Response | 11 Participants |
| Capecitabine | Number of Participants With an Overall Response (Complete Response [CR] + Partial Response [PR]) Between PLD and Capecitabine Treatment Groups | By Investigator Assessment Overall Response | 12 Participants |
Comparison: By Investigator Assessmentp-value: 0.1726Chi-squared
Comparison: By RECIST Criteriap-value: 0.6541Chi-squared
Secondary
Overall Survival Time in the PLD and Capecitabine Treatment Groups
Survival time was defined as duration time from onset of treatment with the study drug until death.
Time frame: From Day 1 (Cycle 1) until Death
Population: ITT: 7 in PLD group and 3 participants in Capecitabine group were missing response assessments and therefore were not included in the analysis.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin (PLD) | Overall Survival Time in the PLD and Capecitabine Treatment Groups | 23.31 Months |
| Capecitabine | Overall Survival Time in the PLD and Capecitabine Treatment Groups | 26.79 Months |
p-value: 0.526595% CI: [0.79, 1.58]Log Rank
Secondary
Quality of Life (QoL) Measured by QoL Questionnaire (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) + Subjective Significance Questionnaire (SSQ))
QoL questionnaire was an EORTC QLQ-C30 & SSQ integration. Scores on the SSQ scale ranged from 1 (very much worse) - 7 (very much better). SSQ consisted of 4 items which corresponded to core domains in the 30 Item EORTC QLQ-C30, such as improvement/deterioration in physical functioning, emotional functioning, social functioning, global QoL. Percentages were based on number of participants at each cycle & rounded to the nearest whole number. Early Withdrawal Questionnaires were obtained in 7-14 days of study drug final dose.
Time frame: From Screening to Day 1 of every Treatment Cycle up to 12 Cycles
Population: ITT: included all randomized participants. There were only a few participants who completed more than 12 cycles due to the longer duration of each cycle.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin (PLD) | Quality of Life (QoL) Measured by QoL Questionnaire (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) + Subjective Significance Questionnaire (SSQ)) | Cycle 3 - A Little Worse | 13 Percentage of Participants |
| Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin (PLD) | Quality of Life (QoL) Measured by QoL Questionnaire (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) + Subjective Significance Questionnaire (SSQ)) | Cycle 6 - A Little Better | 14 Percentage of Participants |
| Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin (PLD) | Quality of Life (QoL) Measured by QoL Questionnaire (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) + Subjective Significance Questionnaire (SSQ)) | Cycle 1 - Moderately Better | 0 Percentage of Participants |
| Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin (PLD) | Quality of Life (QoL) Measured by QoL Questionnaire (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) + Subjective Significance Questionnaire (SSQ)) | Cycle 6 - Moderately Better | 5 Percentage of Participants |
| Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin (PLD) | Quality of Life (QoL) Measured by QoL Questionnaire (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) + Subjective Significance Questionnaire (SSQ)) | Cycle 3 - About the Same | 58 Percentage of Participants |
| Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin (PLD) | Quality of Life (QoL) Measured by QoL Questionnaire (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) + Subjective Significance Questionnaire (SSQ)) | Cycle 6 - Very Much Better | 2 Percentage of Participants |
| Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin (PLD) | Quality of Life (QoL) Measured by QoL Questionnaire (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) + Subjective Significance Questionnaire (SSQ)) | Screening - A Little Worse | 12 Percentage of Participants |
| Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin (PLD) | Quality of Life (QoL) Measured by QoL Questionnaire (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) + Subjective Significance Questionnaire (SSQ)) | Cycle 7 - Very Much Worse | 0 Percentage of Participants |
| Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin (PLD) | Quality of Life (QoL) Measured by QoL Questionnaire (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) + Subjective Significance Questionnaire (SSQ)) | Cycle 3 - A Little Better | 8 Percentage of Participants |
| Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin (PLD) | Quality of Life (QoL) Measured by QoL Questionnaire (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) + Subjective Significance Questionnaire (SSQ)) | Cycle 7 - Moderately Worse | 4 Percentage of Participants |
| Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin (PLD) | Quality of Life (QoL) Measured by QoL Questionnaire (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) + Subjective Significance Questionnaire (SSQ)) | Cycle 1 - Very Much Better | 0 Percentage of Participants |
| Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin (PLD) | Quality of Life (QoL) Measured by QoL Questionnaire (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) + Subjective Significance Questionnaire (SSQ)) | Cycle 7 - A Little Worse | 17 Percentage of Participants |
| Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin (PLD) | Quality of Life (QoL) Measured by QoL Questionnaire (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) + Subjective Significance Questionnaire (SSQ)) | Cycle 3 - Moderately Better | 4 Percentage of Participants |
| Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin (PLD) | Quality of Life (QoL) Measured by QoL Questionnaire (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) + Subjective Significance Questionnaire (SSQ)) | Cycle 7 - About the Same | 52 Percentage of Participants |
| Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin (PLD) | Quality of Life (QoL) Measured by QoL Questionnaire (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) + Subjective Significance Questionnaire (SSQ)) | Cycle 1 - Very Much Worse | 0 Percentage of Participants |
| Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin (PLD) | Quality of Life (QoL) Measured by QoL Questionnaire (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) + Subjective Significance Questionnaire (SSQ)) | Cycle 7 - A Little Better | 13 Percentage of Participants |
| Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin (PLD) | Quality of Life (QoL) Measured by QoL Questionnaire (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) + Subjective Significance Questionnaire (SSQ)) | Cycle 3 - Very Much Better | 0 Percentage of Participants |
| Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin (PLD) | Quality of Life (QoL) Measured by QoL Questionnaire (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) + Subjective Significance Questionnaire (SSQ)) | Cycle 7 - Moderately Better | 13 Percentage of Participants |
| Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin (PLD) | Quality of Life (QoL) Measured by QoL Questionnaire (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) + Subjective Significance Questionnaire (SSQ)) | Cycle 2 - Very Much Worse | 3 Percentage of Participants |
| Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin (PLD) | Quality of Life (QoL) Measured by QoL Questionnaire (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) + Subjective Significance Questionnaire (SSQ)) | Cycle 7 - Very Much Better | 0 Percentage of Participants |
| Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin (PLD) | Quality of Life (QoL) Measured by QoL Questionnaire (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) + Subjective Significance Questionnaire (SSQ)) | Cycle 4 - Very Much Worse | 4 Percentage of Participants |
| Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin (PLD) | Quality of Life (QoL) Measured by QoL Questionnaire (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) + Subjective Significance Questionnaire (SSQ)) | Cycle 8 - Very Much Worse | 0 Percentage of Participants |
| Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin (PLD) | Quality of Life (QoL) Measured by QoL Questionnaire (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) + Subjective Significance Questionnaire (SSQ)) | Screening - A Little Better | 4 Percentage of Participants |
| Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin (PLD) | Quality of Life (QoL) Measured by QoL Questionnaire (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) + Subjective Significance Questionnaire (SSQ)) | Cycle 8 - Moderately Worse | 13 Percentage of Participants |
| Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin (PLD) | Quality of Life (QoL) Measured by QoL Questionnaire (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) + Subjective Significance Questionnaire (SSQ)) | Cycle 4 - Moderately Worse | 11 Percentage of Participants |
| Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin (PLD) | Quality of Life (QoL) Measured by QoL Questionnaire (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) + Subjective Significance Questionnaire (SSQ)) | Cycle 8 - A Little Worse | 17 Percentage of Participants |
| Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin (PLD) | Quality of Life (QoL) Measured by QoL Questionnaire (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) + Subjective Significance Questionnaire (SSQ)) | Cycle 2 - Moderately Worse | 9 Percentage of Participants |
| Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin (PLD) | Quality of Life (QoL) Measured by QoL Questionnaire (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) + Subjective Significance Questionnaire (SSQ)) | Cycle 8 - About the Same | 57 Percentage of Participants |
| Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin (PLD) | Quality of Life (QoL) Measured by QoL Questionnaire (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) + Subjective Significance Questionnaire (SSQ)) | Cycle 4 - A Little Worse | 26 Percentage of Participants |
| Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin (PLD) | Quality of Life (QoL) Measured by QoL Questionnaire (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) + Subjective Significance Questionnaire (SSQ)) | Cycle 8 - A Little Better | 9 Percentage of Participants |
| Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin (PLD) | Quality of Life (QoL) Measured by QoL Questionnaire (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) + Subjective Significance Questionnaire (SSQ)) | Cycle 1 - Moderately Worse | 10 Percentage of Participants |
| Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin (PLD) | Quality of Life (QoL) Measured by QoL Questionnaire (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) + Subjective Significance Questionnaire (SSQ)) | Cycle 8 - Moderately Better | 0 Percentage of Participants |
| Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin (PLD) | Quality of Life (QoL) Measured by QoL Questionnaire (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) + Subjective Significance Questionnaire (SSQ)) | Cycle 4 - About the Same | 47 Percentage of Participants |
| Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin (PLD) | Quality of Life (QoL) Measured by QoL Questionnaire (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) + Subjective Significance Questionnaire (SSQ)) | Cycle 8 - Very Much Better | 4 Percentage of Participants |
| Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin (PLD) | Quality of Life (QoL) Measured by QoL Questionnaire (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) + Subjective Significance Questionnaire (SSQ)) | Cycle 2 - A Little Worse | 25 Percentage of Participants |
| Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin (PLD) | Quality of Life (QoL) Measured by QoL Questionnaire (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) + Subjective Significance Questionnaire (SSQ)) | Cycle 9 - Very Much Worse | 6 Percentage of Participants |
| Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin (PLD) | Quality of Life (QoL) Measured by QoL Questionnaire (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) + Subjective Significance Questionnaire (SSQ)) | Cycle 4 - A Little Better | 9 Percentage of Participants |
| Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin (PLD) | Quality of Life (QoL) Measured by QoL Questionnaire (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) + Subjective Significance Questionnaire (SSQ)) | Cycle 9 - Moderately Worse | 0 Percentage of Participants |
| Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin (PLD) | Quality of Life (QoL) Measured by QoL Questionnaire (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) + Subjective Significance Questionnaire (SSQ)) | Screening - Moderately Worse | 8 Percentage of Participants |
| Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin (PLD) | Quality of Life (QoL) Measured by QoL Questionnaire (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) + Subjective Significance Questionnaire (SSQ)) | Cycle 9 - A Little Worse | 25 Percentage of Participants |
| Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin (PLD) | Quality of Life (QoL) Measured by QoL Questionnaire (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) + Subjective Significance Questionnaire (SSQ)) | Cycle 4 - Moderately Better | 2 Percentage of Participants |
| Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin (PLD) | Quality of Life (QoL) Measured by QoL Questionnaire (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) + Subjective Significance Questionnaire (SSQ)) | Cycle 9 - About the Same | 50 Percentage of Participants |
| Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin (PLD) | Quality of Life (QoL) Measured by QoL Questionnaire (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) + Subjective Significance Questionnaire (SSQ)) | Cycle 2 - About the Same | 51 Percentage of Participants |
| Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin (PLD) | Quality of Life (QoL) Measured by QoL Questionnaire (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) + Subjective Significance Questionnaire (SSQ)) | Cycle 9 - A Little Better | 6 Percentage of Participants |
| Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin (PLD) | Quality of Life (QoL) Measured by QoL Questionnaire (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) + Subjective Significance Questionnaire (SSQ)) | Cycle 4 - Very Much Better | 0 Percentage of Participants |
| Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin (PLD) | Quality of Life (QoL) Measured by QoL Questionnaire (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) + Subjective Significance Questionnaire (SSQ)) | Cycle 9 - Moderately Better | 6 Percentage of Participants |
| Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin (PLD) | Quality of Life (QoL) Measured by QoL Questionnaire (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) + Subjective Significance Questionnaire (SSQ)) | Cycle 1 - A Little Worse | 22 Percentage of Participants |
| Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin (PLD) | Quality of Life (QoL) Measured by QoL Questionnaire (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) + Subjective Significance Questionnaire (SSQ)) | Cycle 9 - Very Much Better | 6 Percentage of Participants |
| Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin (PLD) | Quality of Life (QoL) Measured by QoL Questionnaire (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) + Subjective Significance Questionnaire (SSQ)) | Cycle 5 - Very Much Worse | 5 Percentage of Participants |
| Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin (PLD) | Quality of Life (QoL) Measured by QoL Questionnaire (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) + Subjective Significance Questionnaire (SSQ)) | Cycle 10 - Very Much Worse | 0 Percentage of Participants |
| Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin (PLD) | Quality of Life (QoL) Measured by QoL Questionnaire (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) + Subjective Significance Questionnaire (SSQ)) | Cycle 2 - A Little Better | 9 Percentage of Participants |
| Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin (PLD) | Quality of Life (QoL) Measured by QoL Questionnaire (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) + Subjective Significance Questionnaire (SSQ)) | Cycle 10 - Moderately Worse | 8 Percentage of Participants |
| Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin (PLD) | Quality of Life (QoL) Measured by QoL Questionnaire (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) + Subjective Significance Questionnaire (SSQ)) | Cycle 5 - Moderately Worse | 0 Percentage of Participants |
| Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin (PLD) | Quality of Life (QoL) Measured by QoL Questionnaire (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) + Subjective Significance Questionnaire (SSQ)) | Cycle 10 - A Little Worse | 17 Percentage of Participants |
| Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin (PLD) | Quality of Life (QoL) Measured by QoL Questionnaire (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) + Subjective Significance Questionnaire (SSQ)) | Screening - Moderately Better | 2 Percentage of Participants |
| Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin (PLD) | Quality of Life (QoL) Measured by QoL Questionnaire (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) + Subjective Significance Questionnaire (SSQ)) | Cycle 10 - About the Same | 67 Percentage of Participants |
| Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin (PLD) | Quality of Life (QoL) Measured by QoL Questionnaire (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) + Subjective Significance Questionnaire (SSQ)) | Cycle 5 - A Little Worse | 21 Percentage of Participants |
| Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin (PLD) | Quality of Life (QoL) Measured by QoL Questionnaire (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) + Subjective Significance Questionnaire (SSQ)) | Cycle 10 - A Little Better | 8 Percentage of Participants |
| Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin (PLD) | Quality of Life (QoL) Measured by QoL Questionnaire (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) + Subjective Significance Questionnaire (SSQ)) | Cycle 2 - Moderately Better | 1 Percentage of Participants |
| Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin (PLD) | Quality of Life (QoL) Measured by QoL Questionnaire (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) + Subjective Significance Questionnaire (SSQ)) | Cycle 10 - Moderately Better | 0 Percentage of Participants |
| Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin (PLD) | Quality of Life (QoL) Measured by QoL Questionnaire (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) + Subjective Significance Questionnaire (SSQ)) | Cycle 5 - About the Same | 40 Percentage of Participants |
| Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin (PLD) | Quality of Life (QoL) Measured by QoL Questionnaire (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) + Subjective Significance Questionnaire (SSQ)) | Cycle 10 - Very Much Better | 0 Percentage of Participants |
| Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin (PLD) | Quality of Life (QoL) Measured by QoL Questionnaire (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) + Subjective Significance Questionnaire (SSQ)) | Cycle 1 - About the Same | 63 Percentage of Participants |
| Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin (PLD) | Quality of Life (QoL) Measured by QoL Questionnaire (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) + Subjective Significance Questionnaire (SSQ)) | Cycle 11 - Very Much Worse | 0 Percentage of Participants |
| Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin (PLD) | Quality of Life (QoL) Measured by QoL Questionnaire (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) + Subjective Significance Questionnaire (SSQ)) | Cycle 5 - A Little Better | 19 Percentage of Participants |
| Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin (PLD) | Quality of Life (QoL) Measured by QoL Questionnaire (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) + Subjective Significance Questionnaire (SSQ)) | Cycle 11 - Moderately Worse | 11 Percentage of Participants |
| Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin (PLD) | Quality of Life (QoL) Measured by QoL Questionnaire (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) + Subjective Significance Questionnaire (SSQ)) | Cycle 2 - Very Much Better | 1 Percentage of Participants |
| Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin (PLD) | Quality of Life (QoL) Measured by QoL Questionnaire (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) + Subjective Significance Questionnaire (SSQ)) | Cycle 11 - A Little Worse | 0 Percentage of Participants |
| Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin (PLD) | Quality of Life (QoL) Measured by QoL Questionnaire (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) + Subjective Significance Questionnaire (SSQ)) | Cycle 5 - Moderately Better | 10 Percentage of Participants |
| Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin (PLD) | Quality of Life (QoL) Measured by QoL Questionnaire (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) + Subjective Significance Questionnaire (SSQ)) | Cycle 11 - About the Same | 67 Percentage of Participants |
| Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin (PLD) | Quality of Life (QoL) Measured by QoL Questionnaire (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) + Subjective Significance Questionnaire (SSQ)) | Screening - About the Same | 67 Percentage of Participants |
| Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin (PLD) | Quality of Life (QoL) Measured by QoL Questionnaire (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) + Subjective Significance Questionnaire (SSQ)) | Cycle 11 - A Little Better | 11 Percentage of Participants |
| Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin (PLD) | Quality of Life (QoL) Measured by QoL Questionnaire (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) + Subjective Significance Questionnaire (SSQ)) | Cycle 5 - Very Much Better | 5 Percentage of Participants |
| Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin (PLD) | Quality of Life (QoL) Measured by QoL Questionnaire (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) + Subjective Significance Questionnaire (SSQ)) | Cycle 11 - Moderately Better | 11 Percentage of Participants |
| Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin (PLD) | Quality of Life (QoL) Measured by QoL Questionnaire (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) + Subjective Significance Questionnaire (SSQ)) | Cycle 3 - Very Much Worse | 4 Percentage of Participants |
| Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin (PLD) | Quality of Life (QoL) Measured by QoL Questionnaire (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) + Subjective Significance Questionnaire (SSQ)) | Cycle 11 - Very Much Better | 0 Percentage of Participants |
| Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin (PLD) | Quality of Life (QoL) Measured by QoL Questionnaire (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) + Subjective Significance Questionnaire (SSQ)) | Cycle 6 - Very Much Worse | 5 Percentage of Participants |
| Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin (PLD) | Quality of Life (QoL) Measured by QoL Questionnaire (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) + Subjective Significance Questionnaire (SSQ)) | Cycle 12 - Very Much Worse | 0 Percentage of Participants |
| Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin (PLD) | Quality of Life (QoL) Measured by QoL Questionnaire (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) + Subjective Significance Questionnaire (SSQ)) | Cycle 1 - A Little Better | 5 Percentage of Participants |
| Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin (PLD) | Quality of Life (QoL) Measured by QoL Questionnaire (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) + Subjective Significance Questionnaire (SSQ)) | Cycle 12 - Moderately Worse | 0 Percentage of Participants |
| Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin (PLD) | Quality of Life (QoL) Measured by QoL Questionnaire (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) + Subjective Significance Questionnaire (SSQ)) | Cycle 6 - Moderately Worse | 7 Percentage of Participants |
| Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin (PLD) | Quality of Life (QoL) Measured by QoL Questionnaire (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) + Subjective Significance Questionnaire (SSQ)) | Cycle 12 - A Little Worse | 11 Percentage of Participants |
| Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin (PLD) | Quality of Life (QoL) Measured by QoL Questionnaire (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) + Subjective Significance Questionnaire (SSQ)) | Cycle 3 - Moderately Worse | 13 Percentage of Participants |
| Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin (PLD) | Quality of Life (QoL) Measured by QoL Questionnaire (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) + Subjective Significance Questionnaire (SSQ)) | Cycle 12 - About the Same | 78 Percentage of Participants |
| Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin (PLD) | Quality of Life (QoL) Measured by QoL Questionnaire (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) + Subjective Significance Questionnaire (SSQ)) | Cycle 6 - A Little Worse | 9 Percentage of Participants |
| Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin (PLD) | Quality of Life (QoL) Measured by QoL Questionnaire (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) + Subjective Significance Questionnaire (SSQ)) | Cycle 12 - A Little Better | 11 Percentage of Participants |
| Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin (PLD) | Quality of Life (QoL) Measured by QoL Questionnaire (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) + Subjective Significance Questionnaire (SSQ)) | Screening - Very Much Better | 2 Percentage of Participants |
| Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin (PLD) | Quality of Life (QoL) Measured by QoL Questionnaire (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) + Subjective Significance Questionnaire (SSQ)) | Cycle 12 - Moderately Better | 0 Percentage of Participants |
| Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin (PLD) | Quality of Life (QoL) Measured by QoL Questionnaire (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) + Subjective Significance Questionnaire (SSQ)) | Cycle 6 - About the Same | 58 Percentage of Participants |
| Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin (PLD) | Quality of Life (QoL) Measured by QoL Questionnaire (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) + Subjective Significance Questionnaire (SSQ)) | Cycle 12 - Very Much Better | 0 Percentage of Participants |
| Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin (PLD) | Quality of Life (QoL) Measured by QoL Questionnaire (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) + Subjective Significance Questionnaire (SSQ)) | Screening - Very Much Worse | 4 Percentage of Participants |
| Capecitabine | Quality of Life (QoL) Measured by QoL Questionnaire (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) + Subjective Significance Questionnaire (SSQ)) | Cycle 12 - Very Much Better | 4 Percentage of Participants |
| Capecitabine | Quality of Life (QoL) Measured by QoL Questionnaire (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) + Subjective Significance Questionnaire (SSQ)) | Screening - Very Much Worse | 14 Percentage of Participants |
| Capecitabine | Quality of Life (QoL) Measured by QoL Questionnaire (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) + Subjective Significance Questionnaire (SSQ)) | Screening - Moderately Worse | 14 Percentage of Participants |
| Capecitabine | Quality of Life (QoL) Measured by QoL Questionnaire (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) + Subjective Significance Questionnaire (SSQ)) | Screening - A Little Worse | 24 Percentage of Participants |
| Capecitabine | Quality of Life (QoL) Measured by QoL Questionnaire (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) + Subjective Significance Questionnaire (SSQ)) | Screening - About the Same | 41 Percentage of Participants |
| Capecitabine | Quality of Life (QoL) Measured by QoL Questionnaire (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) + Subjective Significance Questionnaire (SSQ)) | Screening - A Little Better | 0 Percentage of Participants |
| Capecitabine | Quality of Life (QoL) Measured by QoL Questionnaire (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) + Subjective Significance Questionnaire (SSQ)) | Screening - Moderately Better | 0 Percentage of Participants |
| Capecitabine | Quality of Life (QoL) Measured by QoL Questionnaire (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) + Subjective Significance Questionnaire (SSQ)) | Screening - Very Much Better | 7 Percentage of Participants |
| Capecitabine | Quality of Life (QoL) Measured by QoL Questionnaire (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) + Subjective Significance Questionnaire (SSQ)) | Cycle 1 - Very Much Worse | 9 Percentage of Participants |
| Capecitabine | Quality of Life (QoL) Measured by QoL Questionnaire (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) + Subjective Significance Questionnaire (SSQ)) | Cycle 1 - Moderately Worse | 9 Percentage of Participants |
| Capecitabine | Quality of Life (QoL) Measured by QoL Questionnaire (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) + Subjective Significance Questionnaire (SSQ)) | Cycle 1 - A Little Worse | 9 Percentage of Participants |
| Capecitabine | Quality of Life (QoL) Measured by QoL Questionnaire (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) + Subjective Significance Questionnaire (SSQ)) | Cycle 1 - About the Same | 65 Percentage of Participants |
| Capecitabine | Quality of Life (QoL) Measured by QoL Questionnaire (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) + Subjective Significance Questionnaire (SSQ)) | Cycle 1 - A Little Better | 2 Percentage of Participants |
| Capecitabine | Quality of Life (QoL) Measured by QoL Questionnaire (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) + Subjective Significance Questionnaire (SSQ)) | Cycle 1 - Moderately Better | 5 Percentage of Participants |
| Capecitabine | Quality of Life (QoL) Measured by QoL Questionnaire (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) + Subjective Significance Questionnaire (SSQ)) | Cycle 1 - Very Much Better | 0 Percentage of Participants |
| Capecitabine | Quality of Life (QoL) Measured by QoL Questionnaire (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) + Subjective Significance Questionnaire (SSQ)) | Cycle 2 - Very Much Worse | 11 Percentage of Participants |
| Capecitabine | Quality of Life (QoL) Measured by QoL Questionnaire (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) + Subjective Significance Questionnaire (SSQ)) | Cycle 2 - Moderately Worse | 8 Percentage of Participants |
| Capecitabine | Quality of Life (QoL) Measured by QoL Questionnaire (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) + Subjective Significance Questionnaire (SSQ)) | Cycle 2 - A Little Worse | 15 Percentage of Participants |
| Capecitabine | Quality of Life (QoL) Measured by QoL Questionnaire (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) + Subjective Significance Questionnaire (SSQ)) | Cycle 2 - About the Same | 50 Percentage of Participants |
| Capecitabine | Quality of Life (QoL) Measured by QoL Questionnaire (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) + Subjective Significance Questionnaire (SSQ)) | Cycle 2 - A Little Better | 9 Percentage of Participants |
| Capecitabine | Quality of Life (QoL) Measured by QoL Questionnaire (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) + Subjective Significance Questionnaire (SSQ)) | Cycle 2 - Moderately Better | 5 Percentage of Participants |
| Capecitabine | Quality of Life (QoL) Measured by QoL Questionnaire (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) + Subjective Significance Questionnaire (SSQ)) | Cycle 2 - Very Much Better | 3 Percentage of Participants |
| Capecitabine | Quality of Life (QoL) Measured by QoL Questionnaire (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) + Subjective Significance Questionnaire (SSQ)) | Cycle 3 - Very Much Worse | 3 Percentage of Participants |
| Capecitabine | Quality of Life (QoL) Measured by QoL Questionnaire (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) + Subjective Significance Questionnaire (SSQ)) | Cycle 3 - Moderately Worse | 13 Percentage of Participants |
| Capecitabine | Quality of Life (QoL) Measured by QoL Questionnaire (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) + Subjective Significance Questionnaire (SSQ)) | Cycle 3 - A Little Worse | 23 Percentage of Participants |
| Capecitabine | Quality of Life (QoL) Measured by QoL Questionnaire (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) + Subjective Significance Questionnaire (SSQ)) | Cycle 3 - About the Same | 48 Percentage of Participants |
| Capecitabine | Quality of Life (QoL) Measured by QoL Questionnaire (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) + Subjective Significance Questionnaire (SSQ)) | Cycle 3 - A Little Better | 10 Percentage of Participants |
| Capecitabine | Quality of Life (QoL) Measured by QoL Questionnaire (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) + Subjective Significance Questionnaire (SSQ)) | Cycle 3 - Moderately Better | 2 Percentage of Participants |
| Capecitabine | Quality of Life (QoL) Measured by QoL Questionnaire (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) + Subjective Significance Questionnaire (SSQ)) | Cycle 3 - Very Much Better | 0 Percentage of Participants |
| Capecitabine | Quality of Life (QoL) Measured by QoL Questionnaire (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) + Subjective Significance Questionnaire (SSQ)) | Cycle 4 - Very Much Worse | 6 Percentage of Participants |
| Capecitabine | Quality of Life (QoL) Measured by QoL Questionnaire (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) + Subjective Significance Questionnaire (SSQ)) | Cycle 4 - Moderately Worse | 12 Percentage of Participants |
| Capecitabine | Quality of Life (QoL) Measured by QoL Questionnaire (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) + Subjective Significance Questionnaire (SSQ)) | Cycle 4 - A Little Worse | 22 Percentage of Participants |
| Capecitabine | Quality of Life (QoL) Measured by QoL Questionnaire (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) + Subjective Significance Questionnaire (SSQ)) | Cycle 4 - About the Same | 55 Percentage of Participants |
| Capecitabine | Quality of Life (QoL) Measured by QoL Questionnaire (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) + Subjective Significance Questionnaire (SSQ)) | Cycle 4 - A Little Better | 2 Percentage of Participants |
| Capecitabine | Quality of Life (QoL) Measured by QoL Questionnaire (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) + Subjective Significance Questionnaire (SSQ)) | Cycle 4 - Moderately Better | 4 Percentage of Participants |
| Capecitabine | Quality of Life (QoL) Measured by QoL Questionnaire (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) + Subjective Significance Questionnaire (SSQ)) | Cycle 4 - Very Much Better | 0 Percentage of Participants |
| Capecitabine | Quality of Life (QoL) Measured by QoL Questionnaire (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) + Subjective Significance Questionnaire (SSQ)) | Cycle 5 - Very Much Worse | 0 Percentage of Participants |
| Capecitabine | Quality of Life (QoL) Measured by QoL Questionnaire (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) + Subjective Significance Questionnaire (SSQ)) | Cycle 5 - Moderately Worse | 2 Percentage of Participants |
| Capecitabine | Quality of Life (QoL) Measured by QoL Questionnaire (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) + Subjective Significance Questionnaire (SSQ)) | Cycle 5 - A Little Worse | 19 Percentage of Participants |
| Capecitabine | Quality of Life (QoL) Measured by QoL Questionnaire (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) + Subjective Significance Questionnaire (SSQ)) | Cycle 5 - About the Same | 62 Percentage of Participants |
| Capecitabine | Quality of Life (QoL) Measured by QoL Questionnaire (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) + Subjective Significance Questionnaire (SSQ)) | Cycle 5 - A Little Better | 14 Percentage of Participants |
| Capecitabine | Quality of Life (QoL) Measured by QoL Questionnaire (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) + Subjective Significance Questionnaire (SSQ)) | Cycle 5 - Moderately Better | 2 Percentage of Participants |
| Capecitabine | Quality of Life (QoL) Measured by QoL Questionnaire (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) + Subjective Significance Questionnaire (SSQ)) | Cycle 5 - Very Much Better | 0 Percentage of Participants |
| Capecitabine | Quality of Life (QoL) Measured by QoL Questionnaire (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) + Subjective Significance Questionnaire (SSQ)) | Cycle 6 - Very Much Worse | 3 Percentage of Participants |
| Capecitabine | Quality of Life (QoL) Measured by QoL Questionnaire (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) + Subjective Significance Questionnaire (SSQ)) | Cycle 6 - Moderately Worse | 6 Percentage of Participants |
| Capecitabine | Quality of Life (QoL) Measured by QoL Questionnaire (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) + Subjective Significance Questionnaire (SSQ)) | Cycle 6 - A Little Worse | 11 Percentage of Participants |
| Capecitabine | Quality of Life (QoL) Measured by QoL Questionnaire (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) + Subjective Significance Questionnaire (SSQ)) | Cycle 6 - About the Same | 60 Percentage of Participants |
| Capecitabine | Quality of Life (QoL) Measured by QoL Questionnaire (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) + Subjective Significance Questionnaire (SSQ)) | Cycle 6 - A Little Better | 14 Percentage of Participants |
| Capecitabine | Quality of Life (QoL) Measured by QoL Questionnaire (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) + Subjective Significance Questionnaire (SSQ)) | Cycle 6 - Moderately Better | 3 Percentage of Participants |
| Capecitabine | Quality of Life (QoL) Measured by QoL Questionnaire (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) + Subjective Significance Questionnaire (SSQ)) | Cycle 6 - Very Much Better | 3 Percentage of Participants |
| Capecitabine | Quality of Life (QoL) Measured by QoL Questionnaire (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) + Subjective Significance Questionnaire (SSQ)) | Cycle 7 - Very Much Worse | 3 Percentage of Participants |
| Capecitabine | Quality of Life (QoL) Measured by QoL Questionnaire (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) + Subjective Significance Questionnaire (SSQ)) | Cycle 7 - Moderately Worse | 3 Percentage of Participants |
| Capecitabine | Quality of Life (QoL) Measured by QoL Questionnaire (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) + Subjective Significance Questionnaire (SSQ)) | Cycle 7 - A Little Worse | 23 Percentage of Participants |
| Capecitabine | Quality of Life (QoL) Measured by QoL Questionnaire (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) + Subjective Significance Questionnaire (SSQ)) | Cycle 7 - About the Same | 42 Percentage of Participants |
| Capecitabine | Quality of Life (QoL) Measured by QoL Questionnaire (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) + Subjective Significance Questionnaire (SSQ)) | Cycle 7 - A Little Better | 6 Percentage of Participants |
| Capecitabine | Quality of Life (QoL) Measured by QoL Questionnaire (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) + Subjective Significance Questionnaire (SSQ)) | Cycle 7 - Moderately Better | 16 Percentage of Participants |
| Capecitabine | Quality of Life (QoL) Measured by QoL Questionnaire (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) + Subjective Significance Questionnaire (SSQ)) | Cycle 7 - Very Much Better | 6 Percentage of Participants |
| Capecitabine | Quality of Life (QoL) Measured by QoL Questionnaire (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) + Subjective Significance Questionnaire (SSQ)) | Cycle 8 - Very Much Worse | 3 Percentage of Participants |
| Capecitabine | Quality of Life (QoL) Measured by QoL Questionnaire (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) + Subjective Significance Questionnaire (SSQ)) | Cycle 8 - Moderately Worse | 6 Percentage of Participants |
| Capecitabine | Quality of Life (QoL) Measured by QoL Questionnaire (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) + Subjective Significance Questionnaire (SSQ)) | Cycle 8 - A Little Worse | 16 Percentage of Participants |
| Capecitabine | Quality of Life (QoL) Measured by QoL Questionnaire (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) + Subjective Significance Questionnaire (SSQ)) | Cycle 8 - About the Same | 61 Percentage of Participants |
| Capecitabine | Quality of Life (QoL) Measured by QoL Questionnaire (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) + Subjective Significance Questionnaire (SSQ)) | Cycle 8 - A Little Better | 6 Percentage of Participants |
| Capecitabine | Quality of Life (QoL) Measured by QoL Questionnaire (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) + Subjective Significance Questionnaire (SSQ)) | Cycle 8 - Moderately Better | 6 Percentage of Participants |
| Capecitabine | Quality of Life (QoL) Measured by QoL Questionnaire (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) + Subjective Significance Questionnaire (SSQ)) | Cycle 8 - Very Much Better | 0 Percentage of Participants |
| Capecitabine | Quality of Life (QoL) Measured by QoL Questionnaire (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) + Subjective Significance Questionnaire (SSQ)) | Cycle 9 - Very Much Worse | 0 Percentage of Participants |
| Capecitabine | Quality of Life (QoL) Measured by QoL Questionnaire (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) + Subjective Significance Questionnaire (SSQ)) | Cycle 9 - Moderately Worse | 3 Percentage of Participants |
| Capecitabine | Quality of Life (QoL) Measured by QoL Questionnaire (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) + Subjective Significance Questionnaire (SSQ)) | Cycle 9 - A Little Worse | 21 Percentage of Participants |
| Capecitabine | Quality of Life (QoL) Measured by QoL Questionnaire (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) + Subjective Significance Questionnaire (SSQ)) | Cycle 9 - About the Same | 55 Percentage of Participants |
| Capecitabine | Quality of Life (QoL) Measured by QoL Questionnaire (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) + Subjective Significance Questionnaire (SSQ)) | Cycle 9 - A Little Better | 10 Percentage of Participants |
| Capecitabine | Quality of Life (QoL) Measured by QoL Questionnaire (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) + Subjective Significance Questionnaire (SSQ)) | Cycle 9 - Moderately Better | 3 Percentage of Participants |
| Capecitabine | Quality of Life (QoL) Measured by QoL Questionnaire (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) + Subjective Significance Questionnaire (SSQ)) | Cycle 9 - Very Much Better | 7 Percentage of Participants |
| Capecitabine | Quality of Life (QoL) Measured by QoL Questionnaire (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) + Subjective Significance Questionnaire (SSQ)) | Cycle 10 - Very Much Worse | 4 Percentage of Participants |
| Capecitabine | Quality of Life (QoL) Measured by QoL Questionnaire (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) + Subjective Significance Questionnaire (SSQ)) | Cycle 10 - Moderately Worse | 8 Percentage of Participants |
| Capecitabine | Quality of Life (QoL) Measured by QoL Questionnaire (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) + Subjective Significance Questionnaire (SSQ)) | Cycle 10 - A Little Worse | 13 Percentage of Participants |
| Capecitabine | Quality of Life (QoL) Measured by QoL Questionnaire (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) + Subjective Significance Questionnaire (SSQ)) | Cycle 10 - About the Same | 50 Percentage of Participants |
| Capecitabine | Quality of Life (QoL) Measured by QoL Questionnaire (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) + Subjective Significance Questionnaire (SSQ)) | Cycle 10 - A Little Better | 13 Percentage of Participants |
| Capecitabine | Quality of Life (QoL) Measured by QoL Questionnaire (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) + Subjective Significance Questionnaire (SSQ)) | Cycle 10 - Moderately Better | 4 Percentage of Participants |
| Capecitabine | Quality of Life (QoL) Measured by QoL Questionnaire (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) + Subjective Significance Questionnaire (SSQ)) | Cycle 10 - Very Much Better | 8 Percentage of Participants |
| Capecitabine | Quality of Life (QoL) Measured by QoL Questionnaire (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) + Subjective Significance Questionnaire (SSQ)) | Cycle 11 - Very Much Worse | 0 Percentage of Participants |
| Capecitabine | Quality of Life (QoL) Measured by QoL Questionnaire (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) + Subjective Significance Questionnaire (SSQ)) | Cycle 11 - Moderately Worse | 9 Percentage of Participants |
| Capecitabine | Quality of Life (QoL) Measured by QoL Questionnaire (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) + Subjective Significance Questionnaire (SSQ)) | Cycle 11 - A Little Worse | 13 Percentage of Participants |
| Capecitabine | Quality of Life (QoL) Measured by QoL Questionnaire (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) + Subjective Significance Questionnaire (SSQ)) | Cycle 11 - About the Same | 39 Percentage of Participants |
| Capecitabine | Quality of Life (QoL) Measured by QoL Questionnaire (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) + Subjective Significance Questionnaire (SSQ)) | Cycle 11 - A Little Better | 13 Percentage of Participants |
| Capecitabine | Quality of Life (QoL) Measured by QoL Questionnaire (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) + Subjective Significance Questionnaire (SSQ)) | Cycle 11 - Moderately Better | 9 Percentage of Participants |
| Capecitabine | Quality of Life (QoL) Measured by QoL Questionnaire (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) + Subjective Significance Questionnaire (SSQ)) | Cycle 11 - Very Much Better | 17 Percentage of Participants |
| Capecitabine | Quality of Life (QoL) Measured by QoL Questionnaire (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) + Subjective Significance Questionnaire (SSQ)) | Cycle 12 - Very Much Worse | 4 Percentage of Participants |
| Capecitabine | Quality of Life (QoL) Measured by QoL Questionnaire (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) + Subjective Significance Questionnaire (SSQ)) | Cycle 12 - Moderately Worse | 8 Percentage of Participants |
| Capecitabine | Quality of Life (QoL) Measured by QoL Questionnaire (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) + Subjective Significance Questionnaire (SSQ)) | Cycle 12 - A Little Worse | 13 Percentage of Participants |
| Capecitabine | Quality of Life (QoL) Measured by QoL Questionnaire (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) + Subjective Significance Questionnaire (SSQ)) | Cycle 12 - About the Same | 50 Percentage of Participants |
| Capecitabine | Quality of Life (QoL) Measured by QoL Questionnaire (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) + Subjective Significance Questionnaire (SSQ)) | Cycle 12 - A Little Better | 13 Percentage of Participants |
| Capecitabine | Quality of Life (QoL) Measured by QoL Questionnaire (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) + Subjective Significance Questionnaire (SSQ)) | Cycle 12 - Moderately Better | 8 Percentage of Participants |
Secondary
Time to Treatment Failure in the PLD and the Capecitabine Treatment Groups
Time to treatment failure was defined as the duration of time from the date of the first administration of the study drug to the date of discontinuation of the study drug for any reason.
Time frame: From Day 1 (Cycle 1) until End of Treatment
Population: ITT: 7 in PLD group and 3 participants in Capecitabine group were missing response assessments and therefore were not included in the analysis.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin (PLD) | Time to Treatment Failure in the PLD and the Capecitabine Treatment Groups | 4.60 Months |
| Capecitabine | Time to Treatment Failure in the PLD and the Capecitabine Treatment Groups | 3.68 Months |
p-value: 0.0841Log Rank