Skip to content

A Study Comparing Swallowed Flovent and Placebo in Patients With Eosinophilic Disorders

Effect of Swallowed Fluticasone Propionate on Eosinophilic Esophagitis; A Prospective, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00266578
Enrollment
30
Registered
2005-12-19
Start date
2002-10-31
Completion date
2012-10-31
Last updated
2013-04-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Eosinophilic Esophagitis

Keywords

Eosinophilic Esophagitis

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is assessing the efficacy of swallowed Flovent® vs. placebo for the treatment of eosinophilic esophagitis (EE).

Interventions

DRUGFluticasone Propionate

Flovent vs. placebo daily for 3 months

Sponsors

Marc Rothenberg
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
3 Years to 30 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Signed informed consent for study by parent or guardian. Assent will be obtained from all minors 11 years of age and older. * Age older than or equal to 3 years and younger than or equal to 30 years * Endoscopic findings consistent with EE (edema, furrowing, exudates, rings) * Histological findings to include proliferation of basal layer and peak eosinophil density ≥24 per high power field (400x). This degree of tissue eosinophilia has been shown to correlate well with poor-responsiveness to acid suppression therapy, suggesting it is a primary eosinophilic disease and not secondary to GERD\[11\]. * Allergy evaluation including skin-prick testing with multiple food antigens to insure elimination diet is not indicated. * If allergic to specific foods, option to be on a minimum 3 months of elimination diet without detectable resolution by repeat endoscopy with biopsies demonstrating no improvement to disease. * Patients enrolled at CCHMC will be under the direct care of Dr. Putnam or any of the other staff gastroenterologists at this institution who will supervise endoscopic procedures. Patients may also be enrolled at institutions other than CCHMC, but the diagnosis of EE must be validated by an expert pathologist in EE at CCHMC (Margaret Collins, MD). * 20 additional patients without EE will be enrolled as unaffected controls for purposes of comparison with patients with EE. Enrollment pool will comprise patients undergoing routine upper endoscopy and having no identifiable pathology.

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with history of poor tolerance to FP, patients unable to cooperate with use of MDI, pregnant females, patients inhaling any corticosteroid for asthma, and patients with concurrent or recent (within 3 months) use of systemic steroids.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Histologic remission5 yearsHistologic remission,defined by a peak eosinophil count of less than/equal to 1 eosinophil in all 400 fields in both the proximal and distal esophagus.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Furrowing, Epithelial hyperplasia, clinical symptoms5 yearsSecondary outcome measures included presence of endoscopic furrowing, presence of epithelial hyperplasia, and presence of clinical symptoms.

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026