Skip to content

Brain Imaging Study Of Rosiglitazone Efficacy And Safety In Alzheimer's Disease

Effects of Avandia on Cognition and Cerebral Glucose Utilisation in Subjects With Mild to Moderate Alzheimer's Disease (AD).

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00265148
Enrollment
80
Registered
2005-12-14
Start date
2004-05-18
Completion date
2008-07-10
Last updated
2020-11-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Alzheimer's Disease

Keywords

rosiglitazone, cognition, cerebral glucose metabolism, positron emission tomography (PET), Alzheimer's Disease

Brief summary

This is a placebo-controlled study evaluating the effects of rosiglitazone on functional brain activity and cognition in patients with mild to moderate Alzheimer's Disease (AD).

Interventions

DRUGRosiglitazone

Extended Release Tablets

OTHERPlacebo

Placebo dummy to match

Sponsors

GlaxoSmithKline
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
50 Years to 85 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Is male, or if female meets one or more of the following criteria: * Post-menopausal females defined as menopause is defined as\>6months without menstrual period with an appropriate clinical profile, e.g. age appropriate, history of vasomotor symptoms. However if indicated this should be confirmed by oestradiol and FSH levels consistent with menopause (according to local laboratory ranges). Women who are on HRT treatment, and have not been confirmed as post-menopausal should be advised to use contraception.(See Appendix 4)Pre-menopausal females with a documented (medical report verification) hysterectomy and/or bilateral oophorectomy only when the reproductive status of the woman has been confirmed by follow up hormone level assessment. * Meets the National Institute of Neurological and Communicative Diseases and Stroke/Alzheimer's Disease and Related Disorders Association (NINCDS-ADRDA) criteria for Alzheimer's disease, regardless of date of diagnosis relative to study entry date. (See Appendix 5) Has an Alzheimer's disease status of mild to moderate, as classified by a Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) score of 16-26 inclusive at screening. Is aged \>/= 50 to \</= 85 years Prior and current use of medication corresponds with criteria listed in Appendix 3. * Has the ability to comply with requirements of cognitive and other testing. * Has a permanent caregiver who is willing to attend all visits, oversee the subject's compliance with protocol-specified procedures and study medication, and report on subject's status. (Subjects living alone or in a nursing home are not eligible). * Has provided full written informed consent prior to the performance of any protocol-specified procedure; or if unable to provide informed consent due to cognitive status, provision of informed consent by cognitively intact legally acceptable representative (Where this is in accordance with local laws, regulations and ethics committee policy.) Caregiver has provided full written informed consent prior to the performance of any protocol-specified procedure.

Exclusion criteria

* Is unsuitable for MRI scanning as assessed by local pre-MRI questionnaire (GSK to review.) * Has a history of or suffers from claustrophobia. * Is unable to lie comfortably on a bed inside a PET camera with their head in the field of view for at least 60 minutes as assessed by physical examination and medical history (e.g. back pain, arthritis). * Has a history or presence of other neurological or other medical conditions that may influence the outcome or analysis of the PET scan results. Examples of such conditions include, but are not limited to stroke, traumatic brain injury, epilepsy or space occupying lesions. * History of Type I or Type II diabetes mellitus. * Fasting plasma glucose level\>126mg/dL (\>7.0mmol/L) or HbA1c\>6.2%. * History or clinical/laboratory evidence of moderate congestive heart failure defined by the New York Heart Association criteria (class I-IV)(See Appendix 6). Ejection fraction\</=40% determined by echocardiogram, or any other abnormality on echocardiography which in the view of the investigator required further investigation or intervention, or significant abnormalities on screening ECG (in accordance with the definitions below). Significant ECG abnormalities for the purposes of this study. Detection of any of the following abnormalities renders the subject ineligible for the study: 1. ECG heart rate \<50 and \>100 bpm 2. Any previously unrecognised sustained or paroxysmal arrhythmia requiring further intervention e.g. anticoagulation, cardioversion, anti-arrhythmic agent, further investigation etc. 3. PR interval \>0.3 s, 2nd or 3rd degree heart block, symptomatic bifascicular block, trifascicular block. 4. Multifocal ventricular ectopy. 5. Ventricular bigemini or couplets, triplets etc. ECG abnormalities permitted at entry to this study. A subject will not be rendered ineligible by the presence of any of the following abnormalities: 1. AF with a heart rate \<=90 in subjects receiving appropriate anti-platelet or anticoagulant therapy. 2. 1st degree heart block (PR\<=0.3 s). 3. Subjects with a paced rhythm (further information required if subject has an implantable Cardiac Defibrillator). 4. Atrial ectopic beats. 5. Unifocal ventricular ectopic beats. 6. Left or right bundle branch block. 7. Asymptomatice bifascicular block. 8. Left ventricular hypertrophy. 9. Q waves present suggesting previous MI. 10. Repolarisation abnormalities History of new cardiovascular event within the last 6 months (i.e. intervention, percutaneous coronary intervention, vascular surgery, acute coronary syndrome \[non Q-wave myocardial infarction, Q-wave myocardial infarction, unstable angina) or significant arrhythmia; or major intervention (e.g. cardiac surgery or angiography plus stenting) scheduled. * History or clinical laboratory evidence of cerebrovascular disease (stroke, transient ischaemic attack, haemorrhage), or diagnosis of possible, probable or definite vascular dementia in accordance with National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, and Association Internationale pour la Recherche et l'Enseignement en Neurosciences (NINDS-AIREN) criteria (See Appendix 8). * History or evidence of any other CNS disorder that could be interpreted as a cause of dementia: e.g. structural abnormality, epilepsy, infectious or inflammatory/demyelinating CNS conditions, Parkinson's disease. Significant peripheral oedema at the time of screening as assessed by Clinical Evaluation of Oedema and/or Signs of Congestive Heart Failure (Appendix 14) * History of major psychiatric illness such as schizophrenia or bipolar affective disorder, or current depression (score on Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) depression questions \>7, See Appendix 9). Systolic blood pressure \>165 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure \>95 mmHG whilst receiving optimal antihypertensive therapy according to local practice. Clinically significant anaemia (i.e.haemoglobin \<11g/dL for males or \<10 g/dL for females) or presence of haemoglobinopathies which would prevent accurate assessment of HbA1c. Renal dysfunction, defined as creatinine clearance \<30 ml/min (calculated from serum creatinine using the Cockcroft-Gault formula, See Appendix 10). ALT, AST, total bilirubin, or alkaline phosphatase \>2.5 times the upper limit of normal laboratory range, or history of severe hepatobiliary disease (e.g. hepatitis B or C, or cirrhosis (Childs-Pugh classes B/C)) without enzyme elevation. * Fasting triglycerides \>12mmol/L Abnormal/positive result within the past 12 months or at screening for any of the following tests: vitamin B12 (\</=200pg/mL), syphilis serology, thyroid stimulating hormone. * History or presence of gastro-intestinal, hepatic or renal disease or other condition known to interfere with absorption, distribution, metabolism or excretion of drugs. any clinically relevant abnormality, medical or psychiatric condition, which, in the opinion of the investigator, makes the subject unsuitable for inclusion in the study. * Has donated \>/= ml of blood within the past 2 months. Use of any other investigational agent within 30 days or 5 half-lives (whichever is longer) prior to the screening visit. History of alcohol abuse, or of drug abuse within the past 6 months (or has tested positive for drugs of abuse at screening). Subject is unable (with assistance, if appropriate) to take study medication as prescribed throughout the study. * History of non-compliance with prescribed medication, or risk of non-compliance with study medication or procedures. Subject is an immediate family member or employee of the participating investigator or of any of the participating site staff. Shows any neurological abnormality by MRI, which in the opinion of the Principal Investigator would introduce additional risk factors, study procedures or effect endpoint data. MRI scanning will only be conducted on subjects who satisfy all other eligibility criteria. * History of bone marrow transplant Exhibits screening/baseline results not consistent with AD e.g. radiological findings, or results on cognitive tests. Use of tacrine within 30 days prior to the screening visit.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline (Day 1) in Global and Regional Indices of Cerebral Metabolic Rate of Glucose (CMRglu) at Month 12Baseline (Day 1) and Month 12Global CMRGlu index was related to grey matter of brain. Regional CMRGlu index was related to assessment of different regions of brain namely posterior cingulate gyrus, frontal lobe, parietal lobe, posterior temporal lobe, cerebellum, and medial temporal lobe. Evaluation of medial temporal lobe CMRGlu included assessment of medial anterior temporal lobe, paraHippocampal Ambiens gyrus, amygdala, and hippocampus. The regional CMRGlu index is directly proportional to the true metabolic rate of glucose. Baseline was defined as Day 1 of the 12 months treatment period. Change from Baseline is the value at indicated time point minus the Baseline value. Data has been presented for arithmetic mean; however, statistical analysis has been presented for adjusted or least square (LS) mean.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline (Day 1) in Delayed Free Recall Words at Months 1, 6, and 12 by Buschke Selective Reminding (BSR) TestBaseline (Day 1), and Months 1, 6, and 12The BSR test included evaluating short-term memory of a participant to remember a list of unrelated words, to learn the words over 8 trials and to remember these words over 8 trials, and to remember these words during a 20 minute delay. The number of words recalled in delayed free recalls were analyzed. Other parameters analyzed included number recalled Trial 1 immediate, number recalled Trial 8 immediate, total number for all 8 immediate trials, and total number of uncued words recalled. Higher number of words recalled indicated better short term memory and positive treatment differences in these number of words recalled were indicative of superiority of drug over placebo. Baseline measurement was performed on Day 1. Change from Baseline is the value at indicated time point minus the Baseline value. Statistical analysis is presented for difference of means.
Change From Baseline (Day 1) in Delayed Free Recall Items Over Period by Stroop Colour Word Interference (SCWI) at Months 1, 6 and 12Baseline (Day 1), Months1, 6, and 12It is a measure of change from Baseline (Day 1) in clinical scale of AD status. A 3-card version test includes all card containing 50 items each. Participants were asked to complete all items and time in seconds was recorded. Participants first read color words printed in black, then named the printed color of the colored patches, and finally named the printed color of the colored words. The word condition was used to verify that participants were able to read colored words and time to perform color condition was considered as ' control'. The dependent variable was the time to complete the interference condition and the test could have presented in pencil and paper or on screen, both the ways. Change from Baseline is the value at indicated time point minus the Baseline value. Statistical analysis is presented for difference of means.
Change From Baseline (Day 1) in Simplified Spatial Paired Associate Learning (SSPAL) Response Over PeriodBaseline (Day 1), Months 1, 6, and 12Change from Baseline = value at the indicated time point minus the Baseline(Day1) value. SSPAL is a cognitive test that involves object-location memory and learning. It is used to examine cognitive deficits in AD. Participants were asked to sit 50 cm away from screen and different pictures (target and distracter) were shown on a monitor. Responses were acquired from response box. Participants were informed by visual feedback whether the response was correct or incorrect and the accuracy was collected automatically. SSPAL responses were captured as new accuracy and global accuracy. New accuracy was defined as proportion of accurate responses per participant for recall of any new item (picture). Global accuracy was defined as proportion of accurate responses per participant for recall of all new items and their displayed locations (i.e. right or left position on the screen). The possible range for new and global accuracy is 0(worst) to 1(best). Higher values indicate better performance.
Change From Baseline (Day 1) in Accuracy by Choice Reaction Time (CRT) Test Over PeriodBaseline (Day 1) and up to 12 monthsA motor reaction task was presented 4 runs of 50 trials each. In each trial, presentation of a central crosshair for 200 milliseconds (ms) was followed by display of a grey square for 800 ms. The square appeared in two of five possible positions relative to the crosshair (leftmost or rightmost). When the grey square became white, the participant was trained to press the a button. In each trial of the Simple Reaction Time Task, presentation of a central crosshair for 200 ms was followed by display of one square for 800 ms. For both simple and choice versions of the task, trial duration was 4000 ms maximum. The participant was immediately informed (by color changes of the white square) whether the response to each trial was correct or incorrect, and accuracy and reaction time (RT) are automatically calculated. Change from Baseline is the value at indicated time point minus the Baseline value.
Change From Baseline in Cognitive Test by Simple Reaction Time (SRT) Method Over PeriodBaseline (Day 1) and up to 12 monthsA motor reaction task was presented 4 runs of 50 trials each. In each trial, presentation of a central crosshair for 200 milliseconds (ms) was followed by display of a grey square for 800 ms. The square appeared in two of five possible positions relative to the crosshair (leftmost or rightmost). When the grey square became white, the participant was trained to press the a button. In each trial of the Simple Reaction Time Task, presentation of a central crosshair for 200 ms was followed by display of one square for 800 ms. For both simple and choice versions of the task, trial duration was 4000 ms maximum. The participant was immediately informed (by color changes of the white square) whether the response to each trial was correct or incorrect, and accuracy and reaction time (RT) are automatically calculated. Baseline measurement was performed on Day 1. Change from Baseline is the value at indicated time point minus the Baseline value.
Change From Baseline in Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale - Cognitive Scale (ADAS-COG) Total Score Over PeriodBaseline (Day 1), and Months 1, 6, and 12Change from Baseline is the value at indicated time point minus the Baseline value. ADAS-COG is a 13 item, 11 questionnaire assessment of range of cognitive abilities including memory, comprehension, orientation in time and place, and spontaneous speech. The scale ranges from 0 to 70, with negative changes from Baseline indicating the improvement and positive changes indicating worsening of condition. Arithmetic means are presented as raw data; however, statistical analysis is based on LS means.
Change From Baseline in Clinician Based Impression of Change-plus (CBIC +) Score Over PeriodBaseline (Day 1) and Months 1, 6, and 12The CBIC+ assessment for global functioning consists of a 7 point rating scale of severity and change with 1 indicating marked improvement and 7 indicating marked worsening. This scale was used to analyze clinically relevant effect. This was supposed to be performed by an independent investigator who is not a part of the ongoing study. Change from Baseline is the value at indicated time point minus the Baseline value. This scale was used to decide clinical status of AD. Arithmetic means are presented as raw data; however, statistical analysis has been presented for LS means.
Change From Baseline in Neuropsychiatric Inventory Score Over PeriodBaseline (Day 1), Months 1, 6 and 12The NPI assesses the frequency and severity of behavioral disturbances in dementia across 10 domains. The total NPI score was calculated by adding all individual domains cores. The scale ranges from 0 to 120 , 0 indicating no / least burden and 120 indicating maximum burden. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement. Baseline measurement was performed on Day 1. Change from Baseline is the value at indicated time point minus the Baseline value.
Change From Baseline in Mini-mental State Examination (MMSE) Score Over PeriodBaseline (Day 1), and up to Month 12The MMSE consists of 11 categories of orientation, memory (recent and immediate), concentration, language, and praxis. The scale ranges from 0 to 30 with lower scores indicating greater cognitive impairment. Negative changes from Baseline indicate improvement and positive changes indicate increasing symptoms. Change from Baseline is the value at indicated time point minus the Baseline value.
Change From Baseline in Normalized Brain Volume Over PeriodBaseline (Day 1), Month 6 and Month 12Normalized brain volume is a function of global changes in brain structure. Reduction in brain volume is indicative of reduction in Grey matter and thus the AD stage. The method used was structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Change from Baseline is the value at indicated time point minus the Baseline value. Arithmetic means have been presented; however, statistical analysis is based upon the least square (LS) means.
Percent Change From Baseline in Brain Volume Over PeriodBaseline (Day 1), Month 6, and Month 12Percent volume change of brain is a function of global changes in brain structure. Reduction in brain volume is indicative of reduction in Grey matter and thus the AD stage. The method used was structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Baseline value was recorded on Day 1. Change from Baseline is the value at indicated time point minus the Baseline value. Arithmetic means have been presented; however, statistical analysis is based upon the LS means.
Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose at Month 12Baseline (Day 1) and Month 12Fasting plasma glucose are indicative of Glucose metabolism. Baseline measurement was performed on Day 1. Change from Baseline is the value at indicated time point minus the Baseline value.
Change From Baseline (Day 1) in CMRGlu Indices at Months 1 and 6Baseline (Day 1), Months 1, and 6Global CMRGlu index was related to grey matter of brain. Baseline measurement was performed on Day 1. Change from Baseline is the value at indicated time point minus the Baseline value.
Change From Baseline in Lipid (Cholesterol) and Apo-lipoprotein Levels at Month 12Baseline (Day 1) and Month 12Lipid (cholesterol) and apo-lipoprotein (A and B) are biomarkers of glucose metabolism in blood. The method used for analyzes was positron emission tomography (PET) using radiolabelled \[18F\] -fluoro-deoxy-glucose (FDG). Baseline measurement was performed on Day 1. Change from baseline is the value at indicated time point minus the Baseline value.
Change From Baseline in Inflammatory Biomarkers (CD40, C-reactive Protein [CRP] , Interleukin [ IL ]-6, and Tumor Necrosing Factor [TNF]-Alpha)Baseline (Day 1) and Month 12The inflammatory biomarkers namely CD40, C-reactive protein (CRP) , interleukin (IL)-6, and tumor necrosing factor (TNF)-alpha) were analyzed. Baseline measurement was performed on Day 1. Change from Baseline is the value at indicated time point minus the Baseline value.
Change From Baseline in Insulin Sensitivity Measured by Homeostasis Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance (HOMA IR)Baseline (Day 1) and Month 12This is a measure of assessing insulin sensitivity. HOMA IR was calculated by multiplying fasting insulin by fasting plasma glucose and dividing the multiplied digit by 22.5. All samples were collected under fasting condition. Baseline measurement was performed on Day 1. Change from Baseline is the value at indicated time point minus the Baseline value.
Number of Participants by Apo-lipoprotein -e (APOE Epsilon)-4 Allele SubtypeUp to 12 monthsParticipants were categorized into two major types namely those with APOE4 genotype and without APOE4 genotype. Further, 6 subtypes/ alleles of APOE4 gene (as mentioned in the categories below) were analyzed. Participants were also classified as having 0 or 1 or 2 copies of this gene.
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)Up to 12 monthsAdverse event (AE) is an unfavorable change in the health of a participant, including abnormal laboratory findings, that happens during a clinical study or within a certain time period after the study has ended. This change may or may not be caused by the intervention being studied. Serious adverse event (SAE) is an adverse event that results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or extends a current hospital stay, results in an ongoing or significant incapacity or interferes substantially with normal life functions, or causes a congenital anomaly or birth defect. Medical events that do not result in death, are not life-threatening, or do not require hospitalization may be considered serious adverse events if they put the participant in danger or require medical or surgical intervention to prevent one of the results listed above.
Number of Participants With Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) Outside the Concern Range at Month 12At Month 12Number of participants with SBP or DBP outside the defined range of clinical concern were collectively presented for any time on-treatment period. SBP of \<90 millimeters of mercury (mmHg) and \>140 mmHg was considered as of clinical concern. DBP of \<50 and \>90 mmHg was considered as of clinical concern. Increase in SBP from Baseline of \>=40 mmHg and Decrease of \>=30 mmHg was also recorded. Increase in DBP from Baseline of \>=30 mmHg and Decrease of \>=20 mmHg was also recorded.
Number of Participants With Heart Rate/ Pulse Rate Outside the Concern Range at Month 12At Month 12Heart rate was measured in supine position. Number of participants with any time on-treatment values of heart rate values outside the clinical concern were presented. Heart rate values of \>100 or \<50 were considered as of clinical concern. Increase in heart rate from Baseline of \>=30 beats per minute (bpm) and decrease in heart rate from Baseline of \>=30 bpm was also recorded and presented.
Number of Participants With Abnormal 12-lead Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters at Screening and Follow-upAt screening (within 1 month of Day 1) and follow-up period (within 2 weeks of final dose [12 months])Two screening visits were arranged within 30 days of Day 1 of screening period and within 7 to 10 days of Day 1 of screening period. Follow-up period was arranged within 14 days of the last dose (post 12 months) of the study drug. Data for only the participants with abnormal ECG values has been presented.
Number of Participants With Body Weight and Height Outside the Clinical Concern at Month 12At Month 12Body weight and height are the parameters of physical examination. Body weight is also a measure of fluid retention. Body weight increase or decrease of \>= 7 % was considered as of clinical concern. Since there would be no or negligible (insignificant) change in height of a participant, no data has been presented for change from Baseline in height of participants after exposure to the study drug.
Global and Regional CMRglu Index by APOE Epsilon-4 Allele Subtype at 12 MonthAt Month 12The CMRglu was analyzed based on the APOE Epsilon-4 gene allele, whether it was present (positive) or was missing (negative) among the participants. The data has been presented for Month 12. Data has been presented for arithmetic mean; however, statistical analysis presented is based on LS means.
Number of Participants With Hematological Data of Potential Clinical Concern (PCC) at End of Treatment (Month 12)At Month 12Participants were analyzed for any abnormality in basophils, eosinophils, hemoglobin, lymphocytes, monocytes, neutrophils, segmented neutrophils, platelets, red blood cells, and white blood cells with data outside the respective reference ranges. The values higher (H) or lower (L) than the reference range were analyzed at each month. The parameter has not been presented for participants who did not have any abnormality.
Number of Participants With Clinical Chemistry Data of PCC at End of the Treatment (Month 12)At Month 12Participants were analyzed for any abnormality in albumin, alanine aminotransferases, alkaline phosphatase, apolipoprotein A, apolipoprotein B, aspartate aminotransferases, Vitamin B12, direct bilirubin, indirect bilirubin, total bilirubin, cholesterol, creatinine, C-reactive protein, serum glucose, and non-fasting glucose, with data of PCC range. The values higher (H) or lower (L) than the reference range were analyzed at each month. The parameter has not been presented for participants who did not have any abnormality.
Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin [HbA1C] at Month 12Baseline (Day 1) and Month 12HbA1c levels are measure of glucose metabolism in body. Baseline value measurement was performed on Day 1. Change from Baseline is the value at indicated time point minus the Baseline value.

Countries

Canada, United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

This study was conducted from 18 May 2004 to 10 July 2008 at centers across Canada, the United States (US), and the United Kingdom (UK). A total of 80 participants with mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease were planned to be enrolled.

Pre-assignment details

A total of 135 participants were screened of which 80 participants were randomized, during which they received oral Rosiglitazone-extended (RSG-XR) release 4 milligrams (mg) once daily. Intent- to-treat (ITT) population included 78 participants who had more than or equal to 1 efficacy, pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamics, or genetic assessment.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Placebo
Eligible participants received unit oral dose of visually matching Placebo 4 milligrams (mg) for one month. Participants received escalated dose of 8 mg matching placebo for next 12 months and were followed-up to 30 days.
39
Rosiglitazone
Eligible participants received unit oral rosiglitazone extended release (RSG XR) 4 mg for one month with or without food. Participants received escalated dose of rosiglitazone-XR for next 12 months and were followed-up to 30 days.
39
Total78

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event22
Overall StudyIncreasing frailty01
Overall StudyLack of Efficacy02
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up01
Overall StudyPhysician Decision10
Overall StudyProtocol Violation32
Overall StudySubject chose to change of the dose10
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject21

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPlaceboRosiglitazoneTotal
Age, Continuous70.2 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.28
72.5 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.6
71.4 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.45
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
American hispanic
1 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other Caucasiann/ Japanese
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White/Caucasian
37 Participants37 Participants74 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
19 Participants17 Participants36 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
20 Participants22 Participants42 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 400 / 40
other
Total, other adverse events
32 / 4033 / 40
serious
Total, serious adverse events
6 / 404 / 40

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline (Day 1) in Global and Regional Indices of Cerebral Metabolic Rate of Glucose (CMRglu) at Month 12

Global CMRGlu index was related to grey matter of brain. Regional CMRGlu index was related to assessment of different regions of brain namely posterior cingulate gyrus, frontal lobe, parietal lobe, posterior temporal lobe, cerebellum, and medial temporal lobe. Evaluation of medial temporal lobe CMRGlu included assessment of medial anterior temporal lobe, paraHippocampal Ambiens gyrus, amygdala, and hippocampus. The regional CMRGlu index is directly proportional to the true metabolic rate of glucose. Baseline was defined as Day 1 of the 12 months treatment period. Change from Baseline is the value at indicated time point minus the Baseline value. Data has been presented for arithmetic mean; however, statistical analysis has been presented for adjusted or least square (LS) mean.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Month 12

Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population included all participants from all subjects population who had at least one or more than one post-baseline pharmacodynamic (PD) or biomarker, efficacy, or pharmacogenetic (PGx) assessment. Only those participants available at the time of assessment were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline (Day 1) in Global and Regional Indices of Cerebral Metabolic Rate of Glucose (CMRglu) at Month 12Frontal lobe-0.3087 Milligrams per cubic centimeter(mg/cm^3)Standard Deviation 0.55631
PlaceboChange From Baseline (Day 1) in Global and Regional Indices of Cerebral Metabolic Rate of Glucose (CMRglu) at Month 12Posterior temporal lobe-0.2771 Milligrams per cubic centimeter(mg/cm^3)Standard Deviation 0.40458
PlaceboChange From Baseline (Day 1) in Global and Regional Indices of Cerebral Metabolic Rate of Glucose (CMRglu) at Month 12Posterior cingulate gyrus-0.3143 Milligrams per cubic centimeter(mg/cm^3)Standard Deviation 0.57567
PlaceboChange From Baseline (Day 1) in Global and Regional Indices of Cerebral Metabolic Rate of Glucose (CMRglu) at Month 12Cerebellum-0.2523 Milligrams per cubic centimeter(mg/cm^3)Standard Deviation 0.4673
PlaceboChange From Baseline (Day 1) in Global and Regional Indices of Cerebral Metabolic Rate of Glucose (CMRglu) at Month 12Parietal lobe-0.3081 Milligrams per cubic centimeter(mg/cm^3)Standard Deviation 0.50596
PlaceboChange From Baseline (Day 1) in Global and Regional Indices of Cerebral Metabolic Rate of Glucose (CMRglu) at Month 12Medial temporal lobe-0.1950 Milligrams per cubic centimeter(mg/cm^3)Standard Deviation 0.3336
PlaceboChange From Baseline (Day 1) in Global and Regional Indices of Cerebral Metabolic Rate of Glucose (CMRglu) at Month 12Grey matter-0.2793 Milligrams per cubic centimeter(mg/cm^3)Standard Deviation 0.48541
RosiglitazoneChange From Baseline (Day 1) in Global and Regional Indices of Cerebral Metabolic Rate of Glucose (CMRglu) at Month 12Medial temporal lobe-0.0349 Milligrams per cubic centimeter(mg/cm^3)Standard Deviation 0.32429
RosiglitazoneChange From Baseline (Day 1) in Global and Regional Indices of Cerebral Metabolic Rate of Glucose (CMRglu) at Month 12Grey matter-0.0887 Milligrams per cubic centimeter(mg/cm^3)Standard Deviation 0.34985
RosiglitazoneChange From Baseline (Day 1) in Global and Regional Indices of Cerebral Metabolic Rate of Glucose (CMRglu) at Month 12Posterior cingulate gyrus-0.0786 Milligrams per cubic centimeter(mg/cm^3)Standard Deviation 0.36019
RosiglitazoneChange From Baseline (Day 1) in Global and Regional Indices of Cerebral Metabolic Rate of Glucose (CMRglu) at Month 12Frontal lobe-0.1131 Milligrams per cubic centimeter(mg/cm^3)Standard Deviation 0.36876
RosiglitazoneChange From Baseline (Day 1) in Global and Regional Indices of Cerebral Metabolic Rate of Glucose (CMRglu) at Month 12Parietal lobe-0.1175 Milligrams per cubic centimeter(mg/cm^3)Standard Deviation 0.33335
RosiglitazoneChange From Baseline (Day 1) in Global and Regional Indices of Cerebral Metabolic Rate of Glucose (CMRglu) at Month 12Posterior temporal lobe-0.1122 Milligrams per cubic centimeter(mg/cm^3)Standard Deviation 0.32346
RosiglitazoneChange From Baseline (Day 1) in Global and Regional Indices of Cerebral Metabolic Rate of Glucose (CMRglu) at Month 12Cerebellum-0.0248 Milligrams per cubic centimeter(mg/cm^3)Standard Deviation 0.38874
Comparison: For Grey matterp-value: 0.169595% CI: [-0.0583, 0.3251]Mixed model for repeated measures
Comparison: For posterior cingulate Gyrusp-value: 0.105795% CI: [-0.038, 0.388]Mixed model for repeated measures
Comparison: For Frontal lobep-value: 0.183395% CI: [-0.0691, 0.3543]Mixed model for repeated measures
Comparison: For parietal lobep-value: 0.164495% CI: [-0.0574, 0.3307]Mixed model for repeated measures
Comparison: For Posterior temporal lobep-value: 0.150995% CI: [-0.0471, 0.2989]Mixed model for repeated measures
Comparison: For cerebellump-value: 0.204195% CI: [-0.0747, 0.3424]Mixed model for repeated measures
Comparison: For medial temporal lobep-value: 0.144595% CI: [-0.0385, 0.2572]Mixed model for repeated measures
Secondary

Change From Baseline (Day 1) in Accuracy by Choice Reaction Time (CRT) Test Over Period

A motor reaction task was presented 4 runs of 50 trials each. In each trial, presentation of a central crosshair for 200 milliseconds (ms) was followed by display of a grey square for 800 ms. The square appeared in two of five possible positions relative to the crosshair (leftmost or rightmost). When the grey square became white, the participant was trained to press the a button. In each trial of the Simple Reaction Time Task, presentation of a central crosshair for 200 ms was followed by display of one square for 800 ms. For both simple and choice versions of the task, trial duration was 4000 ms maximum. The participant was immediately informed (by color changes of the white square) whether the response to each trial was correct or incorrect, and accuracy and reaction time (RT) are automatically calculated. Change from Baseline is the value at indicated time point minus the Baseline value.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and up to 12 months

Population: ITT population. Only those participants available at the time of assessment were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline (Day 1) in Accuracy by Choice Reaction Time (CRT) Test Over PeriodAccuracy, Left, Month 1-0.0 Percent accuracyStandard Deviation 0.04
PlaceboChange From Baseline (Day 1) in Accuracy by Choice Reaction Time (CRT) Test Over PeriodAccuracy, Left, Month 6-0.1 Percent accuracyStandard Deviation 0.16
PlaceboChange From Baseline (Day 1) in Accuracy by Choice Reaction Time (CRT) Test Over PeriodAccuracy, Left, Month 12-0.1 Percent accuracyStandard Deviation 0.14
PlaceboChange From Baseline (Day 1) in Accuracy by Choice Reaction Time (CRT) Test Over PeriodAccuracy, Right, Month 10.0 Percent accuracyStandard Deviation 0.02
PlaceboChange From Baseline (Day 1) in Accuracy by Choice Reaction Time (CRT) Test Over PeriodAccuracy, Right, Month 6-0.0 Percent accuracyStandard Deviation 0.02
PlaceboChange From Baseline (Day 1) in Accuracy by Choice Reaction Time (CRT) Test Over PeriodAccuracy, Right, Month 12-0.0 Percent accuracyStandard Deviation 0.13
RosiglitazoneChange From Baseline (Day 1) in Accuracy by Choice Reaction Time (CRT) Test Over PeriodAccuracy, Right, Month 60.0 Percent accuracyStandard Deviation 0.15
RosiglitazoneChange From Baseline (Day 1) in Accuracy by Choice Reaction Time (CRT) Test Over PeriodAccuracy, Left, Month 10.0 Percent accuracyStandard Deviation 0.15
RosiglitazoneChange From Baseline (Day 1) in Accuracy by Choice Reaction Time (CRT) Test Over PeriodAccuracy, Right, Month 10.0 Percent accuracyStandard Deviation 0.15
RosiglitazoneChange From Baseline (Day 1) in Accuracy by Choice Reaction Time (CRT) Test Over PeriodAccuracy, Left, Month 60.0 Percent accuracyStandard Deviation 0.14
RosiglitazoneChange From Baseline (Day 1) in Accuracy by Choice Reaction Time (CRT) Test Over PeriodAccuracy, Right, Month 120.0 Percent accuracyStandard Deviation 0.14
RosiglitazoneChange From Baseline (Day 1) in Accuracy by Choice Reaction Time (CRT) Test Over PeriodAccuracy, Left, Month 120.0 Percent accuracyStandard Deviation 0.12
Secondary

Change From Baseline (Day 1) in CMRGlu Indices at Months 1 and 6

Global CMRGlu index was related to grey matter of brain. Baseline measurement was performed on Day 1. Change from Baseline is the value at indicated time point minus the Baseline value.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1), Months 1, and 6

Population: ITT population. Only those participants available at the time of assessment were analyzed

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline (Day 1) in CMRGlu Indices at Months 1 and 6Month 1-0.1049 mg/cm^3Standard Deviation 0.39301
PlaceboChange From Baseline (Day 1) in CMRGlu Indices at Months 1 and 6Month 6-0.1556 mg/cm^3Standard Deviation 0.36397
RosiglitazoneChange From Baseline (Day 1) in CMRGlu Indices at Months 1 and 6Month 10.0475 mg/cm^3Standard Deviation 0.46904
RosiglitazoneChange From Baseline (Day 1) in CMRGlu Indices at Months 1 and 6Month 6-0.0269 mg/cm^3Standard Deviation 0.35311
Comparison: At Month 1p-value: 0.225195% CI: [-0.0763, 0.3185]Mixed model for repeated measures
Comparison: For Month 6p-value: 0.249795% CI: [-0.0643, 0.243]Mixed model for repeated measures
Secondary

Change From Baseline (Day 1) in Delayed Free Recall Items Over Period by Stroop Colour Word Interference (SCWI) at Months 1, 6 and 12

It is a measure of change from Baseline (Day 1) in clinical scale of AD status. A 3-card version test includes all card containing 50 items each. Participants were asked to complete all items and time in seconds was recorded. Participants first read color words printed in black, then named the printed color of the colored patches, and finally named the printed color of the colored words. The word condition was used to verify that participants were able to read colored words and time to perform color condition was considered as ' control'. The dependent variable was the time to complete the interference condition and the test could have presented in pencil and paper or on screen, both the ways. Change from Baseline is the value at indicated time point minus the Baseline value. Statistical analysis is presented for difference of means.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1), Months1, 6, and 12

Population: ITT population. Only the participants available at the time of assessment were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline (Day 1) in Delayed Free Recall Items Over Period by Stroop Colour Word Interference (SCWI) at Months 1, 6 and 12Month 1-0.0 MillisecondsStandard Deviation 0.88
PlaceboChange From Baseline (Day 1) in Delayed Free Recall Items Over Period by Stroop Colour Word Interference (SCWI) at Months 1, 6 and 12Month 60.1 MillisecondsStandard Deviation 0.97
PlaceboChange From Baseline (Day 1) in Delayed Free Recall Items Over Period by Stroop Colour Word Interference (SCWI) at Months 1, 6 and 12Month 120.5 MillisecondsStandard Deviation 1.09
RosiglitazoneChange From Baseline (Day 1) in Delayed Free Recall Items Over Period by Stroop Colour Word Interference (SCWI) at Months 1, 6 and 12Month 1-0.4 MillisecondsStandard Deviation 1.33
RosiglitazoneChange From Baseline (Day 1) in Delayed Free Recall Items Over Period by Stroop Colour Word Interference (SCWI) at Months 1, 6 and 12Month 6-0.2 MillisecondsStandard Deviation 1.06
RosiglitazoneChange From Baseline (Day 1) in Delayed Free Recall Items Over Period by Stroop Colour Word Interference (SCWI) at Months 1, 6 and 12Month 12-0.3 MillisecondsStandard Deviation 1.78
Comparison: For Month 1p-value: 0.704595% CI: [-0.44, 0.3]Repetaed measure mixed model
Comparison: For Month 6p-value: 0.818195% CI: [-0.4, 0.32]Repeated measure mixed model
Comparison: AT Month 12p-value: 0.768895% CI: [-0.71, 0.53]Repeated measure mixed model
Comparison: Overallp-value: 0.68195% CI: [-0.4, 0.26]Repeated measure mixed model
Secondary

Change From Baseline (Day 1) in Delayed Free Recall Words at Months 1, 6, and 12 by Buschke Selective Reminding (BSR) Test

The BSR test included evaluating short-term memory of a participant to remember a list of unrelated words, to learn the words over 8 trials and to remember these words over 8 trials, and to remember these words during a 20 minute delay. The number of words recalled in delayed free recalls were analyzed. Other parameters analyzed included number recalled Trial 1 immediate, number recalled Trial 8 immediate, total number for all 8 immediate trials, and total number of uncued words recalled. Higher number of words recalled indicated better short term memory and positive treatment differences in these number of words recalled were indicative of superiority of drug over placebo. Baseline measurement was performed on Day 1. Change from Baseline is the value at indicated time point minus the Baseline value. Statistical analysis is presented for difference of means.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1), and Months 1, 6, and 12

Population: ITT population. Only the participants available at the time of assessment were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline (Day 1) in Delayed Free Recall Words at Months 1, 6, and 12 by Buschke Selective Reminding (BSR) TestTrial 1 immediate, Month 6-0.2 Number of words recalledStandard Deviation 1.69
PlaceboChange From Baseline (Day 1) in Delayed Free Recall Words at Months 1, 6, and 12 by Buschke Selective Reminding (BSR) TestTrial 8 immediate, Month 12-0.9 Number of words recalledStandard Deviation 1.32
PlaceboChange From Baseline (Day 1) in Delayed Free Recall Words at Months 1, 6, and 12 by Buschke Selective Reminding (BSR) TestDelayed free recall, Month 6-0.1 Number of words recalledStandard Deviation 1.56
PlaceboChange From Baseline (Day 1) in Delayed Free Recall Words at Months 1, 6, and 12 by Buschke Selective Reminding (BSR) TestFor all 8 immediate trial, Month 1-1.4 Number of words recalledStandard Deviation 7.27
PlaceboChange From Baseline (Day 1) in Delayed Free Recall Words at Months 1, 6, and 12 by Buschke Selective Reminding (BSR) TestTrial 1 immediate, Month 12-0.6 Number of words recalledStandard Deviation 1.32
PlaceboChange From Baseline (Day 1) in Delayed Free Recall Words at Months 1, 6, and 12 by Buschke Selective Reminding (BSR) TestFor all 8 immediate trial, Month 6-3.0 Number of words recalledStandard Deviation 7.31
PlaceboChange From Baseline (Day 1) in Delayed Free Recall Words at Months 1, 6, and 12 by Buschke Selective Reminding (BSR) TestTrial 1 immediate, Month 10.2 Number of words recalledStandard Deviation 1.3
PlaceboChange From Baseline (Day 1) in Delayed Free Recall Words at Months 1, 6, and 12 by Buschke Selective Reminding (BSR) TestFor all 8 immediate trial, Month 12-5.8 Number of words recalledStandard Deviation 7.95
PlaceboChange From Baseline (Day 1) in Delayed Free Recall Words at Months 1, 6, and 12 by Buschke Selective Reminding (BSR) TestTrial 8 immediate, Month 1-0.2 Number of words recalledStandard Deviation 1.82
PlaceboChange From Baseline (Day 1) in Delayed Free Recall Words at Months 1, 6, and 12 by Buschke Selective Reminding (BSR) TestUncued words recalled, Month 1-1.7 Number of words recalledStandard Deviation 8.56
PlaceboChange From Baseline (Day 1) in Delayed Free Recall Words at Months 1, 6, and 12 by Buschke Selective Reminding (BSR) TestDelayed free recall, Month 12-0.4 Number of words recalledStandard Deviation 1.32
PlaceboChange From Baseline (Day 1) in Delayed Free Recall Words at Months 1, 6, and 12 by Buschke Selective Reminding (BSR) TestUncued words recalled, Month 6-3.2 Number of words recalledStandard Deviation 7.92
PlaceboChange From Baseline (Day 1) in Delayed Free Recall Words at Months 1, 6, and 12 by Buschke Selective Reminding (BSR) TestTrial 8 immediate, Month 6-0.3 Number of words recalledStandard Deviation 1.29
PlaceboChange From Baseline (Day 1) in Delayed Free Recall Words at Months 1, 6, and 12 by Buschke Selective Reminding (BSR) TestUncued words recalled, Month 12-7.0 Number of words recalledStandard Deviation 9.91
PlaceboChange From Baseline (Day 1) in Delayed Free Recall Words at Months 1, 6, and 12 by Buschke Selective Reminding (BSR) TestDelayed free recall, Month 10.1 Number of words recalledStandard Deviation 1.72
RosiglitazoneChange From Baseline (Day 1) in Delayed Free Recall Words at Months 1, 6, and 12 by Buschke Selective Reminding (BSR) TestUncued words recalled, Month 12-2.0 Number of words recalledStandard Deviation 8.59
RosiglitazoneChange From Baseline (Day 1) in Delayed Free Recall Words at Months 1, 6, and 12 by Buschke Selective Reminding (BSR) TestDelayed free recall, Month 10.2 Number of words recalledStandard Deviation 1.23
RosiglitazoneChange From Baseline (Day 1) in Delayed Free Recall Words at Months 1, 6, and 12 by Buschke Selective Reminding (BSR) TestDelayed free recall, Month 60.0 Number of words recalledStandard Deviation 1.21
RosiglitazoneChange From Baseline (Day 1) in Delayed Free Recall Words at Months 1, 6, and 12 by Buschke Selective Reminding (BSR) TestDelayed free recall, Month 12-0.4 Number of words recalledStandard Deviation 1.53
RosiglitazoneChange From Baseline (Day 1) in Delayed Free Recall Words at Months 1, 6, and 12 by Buschke Selective Reminding (BSR) TestTrial 1 immediate, Month 1-0.1 Number of words recalledStandard Deviation 1.13
RosiglitazoneChange From Baseline (Day 1) in Delayed Free Recall Words at Months 1, 6, and 12 by Buschke Selective Reminding (BSR) TestTrial 1 immediate, Month 6-0.1 Number of words recalledStandard Deviation 1.42
RosiglitazoneChange From Baseline (Day 1) in Delayed Free Recall Words at Months 1, 6, and 12 by Buschke Selective Reminding (BSR) TestTrial 1 immediate, Month 12-0.5 Number of words recalledStandard Deviation 1.27
RosiglitazoneChange From Baseline (Day 1) in Delayed Free Recall Words at Months 1, 6, and 12 by Buschke Selective Reminding (BSR) TestTrial 8 immediate, Month 10.0 Number of words recalledStandard Deviation 1.45
RosiglitazoneChange From Baseline (Day 1) in Delayed Free Recall Words at Months 1, 6, and 12 by Buschke Selective Reminding (BSR) TestTrial 8 immediate, Month 6-0.2 Number of words recalledStandard Deviation 1.21
RosiglitazoneChange From Baseline (Day 1) in Delayed Free Recall Words at Months 1, 6, and 12 by Buschke Selective Reminding (BSR) TestTrial 8 immediate, Month 12-0.2 Number of words recalledStandard Deviation 1.03
RosiglitazoneChange From Baseline (Day 1) in Delayed Free Recall Words at Months 1, 6, and 12 by Buschke Selective Reminding (BSR) TestFor all 8 immediate trial, Month 10.9 Number of words recalledStandard Deviation 5.51
RosiglitazoneChange From Baseline (Day 1) in Delayed Free Recall Words at Months 1, 6, and 12 by Buschke Selective Reminding (BSR) TestFor all 8 immediate trial, Month 60.4 Number of words recalledStandard Deviation 5.85
RosiglitazoneChange From Baseline (Day 1) in Delayed Free Recall Words at Months 1, 6, and 12 by Buschke Selective Reminding (BSR) TestFor all 8 immediate trial, Month 12-0.9 Number of words recalledStandard Deviation 5.27
RosiglitazoneChange From Baseline (Day 1) in Delayed Free Recall Words at Months 1, 6, and 12 by Buschke Selective Reminding (BSR) TestUncued words recalled, Month 10.9 Number of words recalledStandard Deviation 5.43
RosiglitazoneChange From Baseline (Day 1) in Delayed Free Recall Words at Months 1, 6, and 12 by Buschke Selective Reminding (BSR) TestUncued words recalled, Month 60.9 Number of words recalledStandard Deviation 7.55
Comparison: For BSR test , Month 1p-value: 0.761895% CI: [-0.59, 0.8]Repeated measure mixed model
Comparison: For BSR test, Month 6p-value: 0.83595% CI: [-0.53, 0.66]Repeated measure mixed model
Comparison: For BSR test, Month 12p-value: 0.673595% CI: [-0.78, 0.51]Repeated measure mixed model
Secondary

Change From Baseline (Day 1) in Simplified Spatial Paired Associate Learning (SSPAL) Response Over Period

Change from Baseline = value at the indicated time point minus the Baseline(Day1) value. SSPAL is a cognitive test that involves object-location memory and learning. It is used to examine cognitive deficits in AD. Participants were asked to sit 50 cm away from screen and different pictures (target and distracter) were shown on a monitor. Responses were acquired from response box. Participants were informed by visual feedback whether the response was correct or incorrect and the accuracy was collected automatically. SSPAL responses were captured as new accuracy and global accuracy. New accuracy was defined as proportion of accurate responses per participant for recall of any new item (picture). Global accuracy was defined as proportion of accurate responses per participant for recall of all new items and their displayed locations (i.e. right or left position on the screen). The possible range for new and global accuracy is 0(worst) to 1(best). Higher values indicate better performance.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1), Months 1, 6, and 12

Population: ITT population. Only those participants available at the time of assessment were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline (Day 1) in Simplified Spatial Paired Associate Learning (SSPAL) Response Over PeriodGlobal accuracy, Month 6-0.0 Proportion of accurate responsesStandard Deviation 0.14
PlaceboChange From Baseline (Day 1) in Simplified Spatial Paired Associate Learning (SSPAL) Response Over PeriodNew accuracy, Month 10.1 Proportion of accurate responsesStandard Deviation 0.22
PlaceboChange From Baseline (Day 1) in Simplified Spatial Paired Associate Learning (SSPAL) Response Over PeriodNew accuracy, Month 60.0 Proportion of accurate responsesStandard Deviation 0.19
PlaceboChange From Baseline (Day 1) in Simplified Spatial Paired Associate Learning (SSPAL) Response Over PeriodGlobal accuracy, Month 1-0.0 Proportion of accurate responsesStandard Deviation 0.16
PlaceboChange From Baseline (Day 1) in Simplified Spatial Paired Associate Learning (SSPAL) Response Over PeriodNew accuracy, Month 12-0.0 Proportion of accurate responsesStandard Deviation 0.22
PlaceboChange From Baseline (Day 1) in Simplified Spatial Paired Associate Learning (SSPAL) Response Over PeriodGlobal accuracy, Month 12-0.0 Proportion of accurate responsesStandard Deviation 0.15
RosiglitazoneChange From Baseline (Day 1) in Simplified Spatial Paired Associate Learning (SSPAL) Response Over PeriodNew accuracy, Month 12-0.1 Proportion of accurate responsesStandard Deviation 0.22
RosiglitazoneChange From Baseline (Day 1) in Simplified Spatial Paired Associate Learning (SSPAL) Response Over PeriodGlobal accuracy, Month 10.0 Proportion of accurate responsesStandard Deviation 0.06
RosiglitazoneChange From Baseline (Day 1) in Simplified Spatial Paired Associate Learning (SSPAL) Response Over PeriodGlobal accuracy, Month 6-0.0 Proportion of accurate responsesStandard Deviation 0.12
RosiglitazoneChange From Baseline (Day 1) in Simplified Spatial Paired Associate Learning (SSPAL) Response Over PeriodGlobal accuracy, Month 120.0 Proportion of accurate responsesStandard Deviation 0.12
RosiglitazoneChange From Baseline (Day 1) in Simplified Spatial Paired Associate Learning (SSPAL) Response Over PeriodNew accuracy, Month 6-0.0 Proportion of accurate responsesStandard Deviation 0.29
RosiglitazoneChange From Baseline (Day 1) in Simplified Spatial Paired Associate Learning (SSPAL) Response Over PeriodNew accuracy, Month 10.0 Proportion of accurate responsesStandard Deviation 0.17
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale - Cognitive Scale (ADAS-COG) Total Score Over Period

Change from Baseline is the value at indicated time point minus the Baseline value. ADAS-COG is a 13 item, 11 questionnaire assessment of range of cognitive abilities including memory, comprehension, orientation in time and place, and spontaneous speech. The scale ranges from 0 to 70, with negative changes from Baseline indicating the improvement and positive changes indicating worsening of condition. Arithmetic means are presented as raw data; however, statistical analysis is based on LS means.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1), and Months 1, 6, and 12

Population: ITT population. Only the participants available at the time of assessment were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale - Cognitive Scale (ADAS-COG) Total Score Over PeriodMonth 1-0. Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.38
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale - Cognitive Scale (ADAS-COG) Total Score Over PeriodMonth 61.7 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.73
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale - Cognitive Scale (ADAS-COG) Total Score Over PeriodMonth 125.7 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.52
RosiglitazoneChange From Baseline in Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale - Cognitive Scale (ADAS-COG) Total Score Over PeriodMonth 1-0.5 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.84
RosiglitazoneChange From Baseline in Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale - Cognitive Scale (ADAS-COG) Total Score Over PeriodMonth 63.2 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.58
RosiglitazoneChange From Baseline in Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale - Cognitive Scale (ADAS-COG) Total Score Over PeriodMonth 126.6 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.8
Comparison: At Month 1p-value: 0.859395% CI: [-2.38, 1.99]Repeated measure mixed model
Comparison: At Month 6p-value: 0.320195% CI: [-1.43, 4.32]Repeated measure mixed model
Comparison: At Month 12p-value: 0.262795% CI: [-1.68, 6.04]Repeated measure mixed model
Comparison: For overall periodp-value: 0.363395% CI: [-1.35, 3.64]Repeated measure mixed model
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Clinician Based Impression of Change-plus (CBIC +) Score Over Period

The CBIC+ assessment for global functioning consists of a 7 point rating scale of severity and change with 1 indicating marked improvement and 7 indicating marked worsening. This scale was used to analyze clinically relevant effect. This was supposed to be performed by an independent investigator who is not a part of the ongoing study. Change from Baseline is the value at indicated time point minus the Baseline value. This scale was used to decide clinical status of AD. Arithmetic means are presented as raw data; however, statistical analysis has been presented for LS means.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Months 1, 6, and 12

Population: ITT population. Only the participants available at the time of assessment were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Clinician Based Impression of Change-plus (CBIC +) Score Over PeriodMonth 13.9 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.08
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Clinician Based Impression of Change-plus (CBIC +) Score Over PeriodMonth 64.7 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.93
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Clinician Based Impression of Change-plus (CBIC +) Score Over PeriodMonth 124.9 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.03
RosiglitazoneChange From Baseline in Clinician Based Impression of Change-plus (CBIC +) Score Over PeriodMonth 124.8 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.38
RosiglitazoneChange From Baseline in Clinician Based Impression of Change-plus (CBIC +) Score Over PeriodMonth 13.9 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.95
RosiglitazoneChange From Baseline in Clinician Based Impression of Change-plus (CBIC +) Score Over PeriodMonth 64.5 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.22
Comparison: For overall periodp-value: 0.564795% CI: [-0.48, 0.26]Repetaed measure mixed model
Comparison: For Month 1p-value: 0.993595% CI: [-0.46, 0.46]Repeated measure mixed model
Comparison: At Month 6p-value: 0.379495% CI: [-0.72, 0.28]Repeated measure mixed model
Comparison: At Month 12p-value: 0.735795% CI: [-0.7, 0.49]Repeated measure mixed model
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Cognitive Test by Simple Reaction Time (SRT) Method Over Period

A motor reaction task was presented 4 runs of 50 trials each. In each trial, presentation of a central crosshair for 200 milliseconds (ms) was followed by display of a grey square for 800 ms. The square appeared in two of five possible positions relative to the crosshair (leftmost or rightmost). When the grey square became white, the participant was trained to press the a button. In each trial of the Simple Reaction Time Task, presentation of a central crosshair for 200 ms was followed by display of one square for 800 ms. For both simple and choice versions of the task, trial duration was 4000 ms maximum. The participant was immediately informed (by color changes of the white square) whether the response to each trial was correct or incorrect, and accuracy and reaction time (RT) are automatically calculated. Baseline measurement was performed on Day 1. Change from Baseline is the value at indicated time point minus the Baseline value.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and up to 12 months

Population: ITT population. Only those participants available at the time of assessment were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Cognitive Test by Simple Reaction Time (SRT) Method Over PeriodMonth 1-17.1 MillisecondsStandard Deviation 161.7
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Cognitive Test by Simple Reaction Time (SRT) Method Over PeriodMonth 637.8 MillisecondsStandard Deviation 170.67
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Cognitive Test by Simple Reaction Time (SRT) Method Over PeriodMonth 12177.7 MillisecondsStandard Deviation 359.91
RosiglitazoneChange From Baseline in Cognitive Test by Simple Reaction Time (SRT) Method Over PeriodMonth 136.5 MillisecondsStandard Deviation 162.72
RosiglitazoneChange From Baseline in Cognitive Test by Simple Reaction Time (SRT) Method Over PeriodMonth 659.3 MillisecondsStandard Deviation 158.32
RosiglitazoneChange From Baseline in Cognitive Test by Simple Reaction Time (SRT) Method Over PeriodMonth 1276.4 MillisecondsStandard Deviation 179.78
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose at Month 12

Fasting plasma glucose are indicative of Glucose metabolism. Baseline measurement was performed on Day 1. Change from Baseline is the value at indicated time point minus the Baseline value.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Month 12

Population: ITT population. Only the participants available at the time of assessment were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose at Month 120.2556 Millimoles per LiterStandard Deviation 0.99974
RosiglitazoneChange From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose at Month 12-0.1750 Millimoles per LiterStandard Deviation 0.4881
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin [HbA1C] at Month 12

HbA1c levels are measure of glucose metabolism in body. Baseline value measurement was performed on Day 1. Change from Baseline is the value at indicated time point minus the Baseline value.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Month 12

Population: ITT population. Only those participants available at the time of assessment were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin [HbA1C] at Month 120.0625 Percentage of HbA1cStandard Deviation 0.43533
RosiglitazoneChange From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin [HbA1C] at Month 120.3871 Percentage of HbA1cStandard Deviation 0.49514
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Inflammatory Biomarkers (CD40, C-reactive Protein [CRP] , Interleukin [ IL ]-6, and Tumor Necrosing Factor [TNF]-Alpha)

The inflammatory biomarkers namely CD40, C-reactive protein (CRP) , interleukin (IL)-6, and tumor necrosing factor (TNF)-alpha) were analyzed. Baseline measurement was performed on Day 1. Change from Baseline is the value at indicated time point minus the Baseline value.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Month 12

Population: ITT population. Only those participants available at the time of assessment were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Inflammatory Biomarkers (CD40, C-reactive Protein [CRP] , Interleukin [ IL ]-6, and Tumor Necrosing Factor [TNF]-Alpha)CD40-236.79 Nanograms per LiterStandard Deviation 2500.3
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Inflammatory Biomarkers (CD40, C-reactive Protein [CRP] , Interleukin [ IL ]-6, and Tumor Necrosing Factor [TNF]-Alpha)CRP0.8161 Nanograms per LiterStandard Deviation 5.94099
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Inflammatory Biomarkers (CD40, C-reactive Protein [CRP] , Interleukin [ IL ]-6, and Tumor Necrosing Factor [TNF]-Alpha)IL-66.3390 Nanograms per LiterStandard Deviation 22.5103
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Inflammatory Biomarkers (CD40, C-reactive Protein [CRP] , Interleukin [ IL ]-6, and Tumor Necrosing Factor [TNF]-Alpha)TNF-alpha16.7893 Nanograms per LiterStandard Deviation 53.0817
RosiglitazoneChange From Baseline in Inflammatory Biomarkers (CD40, C-reactive Protein [CRP] , Interleukin [ IL ]-6, and Tumor Necrosing Factor [TNF]-Alpha)TNF-alpha3.8407 Nanograms per LiterStandard Deviation 15.997
RosiglitazoneChange From Baseline in Inflammatory Biomarkers (CD40, C-reactive Protein [CRP] , Interleukin [ IL ]-6, and Tumor Necrosing Factor [TNF]-Alpha)CD40130.543 Nanograms per LiterStandard Deviation 2580.16
RosiglitazoneChange From Baseline in Inflammatory Biomarkers (CD40, C-reactive Protein [CRP] , Interleukin [ IL ]-6, and Tumor Necrosing Factor [TNF]-Alpha)IL-62.6370 Nanograms per LiterStandard Deviation 11.1159
RosiglitazoneChange From Baseline in Inflammatory Biomarkers (CD40, C-reactive Protein [CRP] , Interleukin [ IL ]-6, and Tumor Necrosing Factor [TNF]-Alpha)CRP-1.4800 Nanograms per LiterStandard Deviation 4.63565
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Insulin Sensitivity Measured by Homeostasis Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance (HOMA IR)

This is a measure of assessing insulin sensitivity. HOMA IR was calculated by multiplying fasting insulin by fasting plasma glucose and dividing the multiplied digit by 22.5. All samples were collected under fasting condition. Baseline measurement was performed on Day 1. Change from Baseline is the value at indicated time point minus the Baseline value.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Month 12

Population: ITT population. Only those participants available at the time of assessment were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Insulin Sensitivity Measured by Homeostasis Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance (HOMA IR)-0.2703 HOMA IR scoreStandard Deviation 12.6037
RosiglitazoneChange From Baseline in Insulin Sensitivity Measured by Homeostasis Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance (HOMA IR)-5.9910 HOMA IR scoreStandard Deviation 9.79511
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Lipid (Cholesterol) and Apo-lipoprotein Levels at Month 12

Lipid (cholesterol) and apo-lipoprotein (A and B) are biomarkers of glucose metabolism in blood. The method used for analyzes was positron emission tomography (PET) using radiolabelled \[18F\] -fluoro-deoxy-glucose (FDG). Baseline measurement was performed on Day 1. Change from baseline is the value at indicated time point minus the Baseline value.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Month 12

Population: ITT population. Only those participants available at the time of assessment were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Lipid (Cholesterol) and Apo-lipoprotein Levels at Month 12Apolipoprotein A-0.0478 Grams per LiterStandard Deviation 0.29284
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Lipid (Cholesterol) and Apo-lipoprotein Levels at Month 12Apolipoprotein B-0.0191 Grams per LiterStandard Deviation 0.18714
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Lipid (Cholesterol) and Apo-lipoprotein Levels at Month 12Cholesterol-0.2556 Grams per LiterStandard Deviation 0.69756
RosiglitazoneChange From Baseline in Lipid (Cholesterol) and Apo-lipoprotein Levels at Month 12Apolipoprotein A-0.2058 Grams per LiterStandard Deviation 0.27424
RosiglitazoneChange From Baseline in Lipid (Cholesterol) and Apo-lipoprotein Levels at Month 12Apolipoprotein B-0.0006 Grams per LiterStandard Deviation 0.2507
RosiglitazoneChange From Baseline in Lipid (Cholesterol) and Apo-lipoprotein Levels at Month 12Cholesterol0.1340 Grams per LiterStandard Deviation 1.09229
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Mini-mental State Examination (MMSE) Score Over Period

The MMSE consists of 11 categories of orientation, memory (recent and immediate), concentration, language, and praxis. The scale ranges from 0 to 30 with lower scores indicating greater cognitive impairment. Negative changes from Baseline indicate improvement and positive changes indicate increasing symptoms. Change from Baseline is the value at indicated time point minus the Baseline value.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1), and up to Month 12

Population: ITT population. Only those participants available at the time of assessment were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Mini-mental State Examination (MMSE) Score Over Period-3.3 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.09
RosiglitazoneChange From Baseline in Mini-mental State Examination (MMSE) Score Over Period-2.6 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.27
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Neuropsychiatric Inventory Score Over Period

The NPI assesses the frequency and severity of behavioral disturbances in dementia across 10 domains. The total NPI score was calculated by adding all individual domains cores. The scale ranges from 0 to 120 , 0 indicating no / least burden and 120 indicating maximum burden. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement. Baseline measurement was performed on Day 1. Change from Baseline is the value at indicated time point minus the Baseline value.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1), Months 1, 6 and 12

Population: ITT population. Only the participants available at the time of assessment were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Neuropsychiatric Inventory Score Over PeriodMonth 1-1.6 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.3
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Neuropsychiatric Inventory Score Over PeriodMonth 62.1 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.63
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Neuropsychiatric Inventory Score Over PeriodMonth 120.9 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.39
RosiglitazoneChange From Baseline in Neuropsychiatric Inventory Score Over PeriodMonth 1-2.6 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.82
RosiglitazoneChange From Baseline in Neuropsychiatric Inventory Score Over PeriodMonth 6-0.8 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.59
RosiglitazoneChange From Baseline in Neuropsychiatric Inventory Score Over PeriodMonth 121.8 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.84
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Normalized Brain Volume Over Period

Normalized brain volume is a function of global changes in brain structure. Reduction in brain volume is indicative of reduction in Grey matter and thus the AD stage. The method used was structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Change from Baseline is the value at indicated time point minus the Baseline value. Arithmetic means have been presented; however, statistical analysis is based upon the least square (LS) means.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1), Month 6 and Month 12

Population: ITT population. Only those participants available at the time of assessment were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Normalized Brain Volume Over PeriodMonth 6-4553.1 Cubic millimeterStandard Deviation 43069.12
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Normalized Brain Volume Over PeriodMonth 12-16599.9 Cubic millimeterStandard Deviation 47173.85
RosiglitazoneChange From Baseline in Normalized Brain Volume Over PeriodMonth 6-15995.6 Cubic millimeterStandard Deviation 41075.95
RosiglitazoneChange From Baseline in Normalized Brain Volume Over PeriodMonth 12-13929.6 Cubic millimeterStandard Deviation 31031.06
Comparison: At Month 6p-value: 0.629995% CI: [-255515.6, 15572.4]Repeated measure mixed model
Comparison: At Month 12p-value: 0.218495% CI: [-7450.6, 31896.5]Repeated measure mixed model
Secondary

Global and Regional CMRglu Index by APOE Epsilon-4 Allele Subtype at 12 Month

The CMRglu was analyzed based on the APOE Epsilon-4 gene allele, whether it was present (positive) or was missing (negative) among the participants. The data has been presented for Month 12. Data has been presented for arithmetic mean; however, statistical analysis presented is based on LS means.

Time frame: At Month 12

Population: PGx ITT population included all participants in ITT population who had evaluable PGx data (who consented to genotyping, provided an identified blood sample for genotyping and were successfully genotyped for at least one of the genetic markers under study. Only the participants available at the time of assessment were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboGlobal and Regional CMRglu Index by APOE Epsilon-4 Allele Subtype at 12 MonthParietal lobe, APOE positive-0.2919 milligrams per cubic centimeterStandard Deviation 0.60832
PlaceboGlobal and Regional CMRglu Index by APOE Epsilon-4 Allele Subtype at 12 MonthGrey matter, APOE negative-0.1577 milligrams per cubic centimeterStandard Deviation 0.06551
PlaceboGlobal and Regional CMRglu Index by APOE Epsilon-4 Allele Subtype at 12 MonthGrey matter, APOE positive-0.2649 milligrams per cubic centimeterStandard Deviation 0.58442
PlaceboGlobal and Regional CMRglu Index by APOE Epsilon-4 Allele Subtype at 12 MonthPosterior cingulate gyrus, APOE negative-0.2655 milligrams per cubic centimeterStandard Deviation 0.11854
PlaceboGlobal and Regional CMRglu Index by APOE Epsilon-4 Allele Subtype at 12 MonthPosterior temporal lobe, APOE positive-0.2722 milligrams per cubic centimeterStandard Deviation 0.48425
PlaceboGlobal and Regional CMRglu Index by APOE Epsilon-4 Allele Subtype at 12 MonthFrontal lobe, APOE positive-0.2939 milligrams per cubic centimeterStandard Deviation 0.66878
PlaceboGlobal and Regional CMRglu Index by APOE Epsilon-4 Allele Subtype at 12 MonthParietal lobe, APOE negative-0.1549 milligrams per cubic centimeterStandard Deviation 0.08056
PlaceboGlobal and Regional CMRglu Index by APOE Epsilon-4 Allele Subtype at 12 MonthCerebellum, APOE positive-0.2280 milligrams per cubic centimeterStandard Deviation 0.54477
PlaceboGlobal and Regional CMRglu Index by APOE Epsilon-4 Allele Subtype at 12 MonthPosterior temporal lobe, APOE negative-0.1391 milligrams per cubic centimeterStandard Deviation 0.1166
PlaceboGlobal and Regional CMRglu Index by APOE Epsilon-4 Allele Subtype at 12 MonthPosterior cingulate gyrus, APOE positive-0.2728 milligrams per cubic centimeterStandard Deviation 0.69449
PlaceboGlobal and Regional CMRglu Index by APOE Epsilon-4 Allele Subtype at 12 MonthCerebellum, APOE negative-0.1732 milligrams per cubic centimeterStandard Deviation 0.05698
PlaceboGlobal and Regional CMRglu Index by APOE Epsilon-4 Allele Subtype at 12 MonthMedial temporal lobe, APOE positive-0.1647 milligrams per cubic centimeterStandard Deviation 0.398
PlaceboGlobal and Regional CMRglu Index by APOE Epsilon-4 Allele Subtype at 12 MonthMedial temporal lobe, APOE negative-0.1134 milligrams per cubic centimeterStandard Deviation 0.06707
PlaceboGlobal and Regional CMRglu Index by APOE Epsilon-4 Allele Subtype at 12 MonthFrontal lobe, APOE negative-0.1967 milligrams per cubic centimeterStandard Deviation 0.09081
RosiglitazoneGlobal and Regional CMRglu Index by APOE Epsilon-4 Allele Subtype at 12 MonthMedial temporal lobe, APOE negative0.0026 milligrams per cubic centimeterStandard Deviation 0.14382
RosiglitazoneGlobal and Regional CMRglu Index by APOE Epsilon-4 Allele Subtype at 12 MonthGrey matter, APOE positive-0.0903 milligrams per cubic centimeterStandard Deviation 0.4427
RosiglitazoneGlobal and Regional CMRglu Index by APOE Epsilon-4 Allele Subtype at 12 MonthPosterior cingulate gyrus, APOE positive-0.0987 milligrams per cubic centimeterStandard Deviation 0.43553
RosiglitazoneGlobal and Regional CMRglu Index by APOE Epsilon-4 Allele Subtype at 12 MonthFrontal lobe, APOE positive-0.1046 milligrams per cubic centimeterStandard Deviation 0.45385
RosiglitazoneGlobal and Regional CMRglu Index by APOE Epsilon-4 Allele Subtype at 12 MonthParietal lobe, APOE positive-0.1404 milligrams per cubic centimeterStandard Deviation 0.42635
RosiglitazoneGlobal and Regional CMRglu Index by APOE Epsilon-4 Allele Subtype at 12 MonthPosterior temporal lobe, APOE positive-0.1175 milligrams per cubic centimeterStandard Deviation 0.42617
RosiglitazoneGlobal and Regional CMRglu Index by APOE Epsilon-4 Allele Subtype at 12 MonthCerebellum, APOE positive-0.0375 milligrams per cubic centimeterStandard Deviation 0.4915
RosiglitazoneGlobal and Regional CMRglu Index by APOE Epsilon-4 Allele Subtype at 12 MonthMedial temporal lobe, APOE positive-0.0004 milligrams per cubic centimeterStandard Deviation 0.43929
RosiglitazoneGlobal and Regional CMRglu Index by APOE Epsilon-4 Allele Subtype at 12 MonthGrey matter, APOE negative-0.0107 milligrams per cubic centimeterStandard Deviation 0.16654
RosiglitazoneGlobal and Regional CMRglu Index by APOE Epsilon-4 Allele Subtype at 12 MonthPosterior cingulate gyrus, APOE negative0.0141 milligrams per cubic centimeterStandard Deviation 0.17927
RosiglitazoneGlobal and Regional CMRglu Index by APOE Epsilon-4 Allele Subtype at 12 MonthFrontal lobe, APOE negative-0.0323 milligrams per cubic centimeterStandard Deviation 0.17438
RosiglitazoneGlobal and Regional CMRglu Index by APOE Epsilon-4 Allele Subtype at 12 MonthParietal lobe, APOE negative-0.0362 milligrams per cubic centimeterStandard Deviation 0.17425
RosiglitazoneGlobal and Regional CMRglu Index by APOE Epsilon-4 Allele Subtype at 12 MonthPosterior temporal lobe, APOE negative-0.0443 milligrams per cubic centimeterStandard Deviation 0.16786
RosiglitazoneGlobal and Regional CMRglu Index by APOE Epsilon-4 Allele Subtype at 12 MonthCerebellum, APOE negative0.0742 milligrams per cubic centimeterStandard Deviation 0.1523
Comparison: For Grey matter, APOE Epsilon-4 status positivep-value: 0.2895% CI: [-0.0967, 0.3275]Repeated measure mixed model
Comparison: For Grey matter, APOE Epsilon-4 status negativep-value: 0.415995% CI: [-0.1931, 0.4605]Repeated measure mixed model
Comparison: For posterior cingulate gyrus, APOE Epsilon-4 status positivep-value: 0.215895% CI: [-0.0897, 0.3878]Repeated measure mixed model
Comparison: For posterior cingulate gyrus, APOE Epsilon-4 status negativep-value: 0.208795% CI: [-0.135, 0.6042]Repeated measure mixed model
Comparison: For Frontal lobe, APOE Epsilon-4 status positivep-value: 0.306495% CI: [-0.1162, 0.3628]Repeated measure mixed model
Comparison: For Frontal lobe APOE Epsilon-4 status negativep-value: 0.3595% CI: [-0.1952, 0.542]Repeated measure mixed model
Comparison: For parietal lobe, APOE Epsilon-4 status positivep-value: 0.248795% CI: [-0.0937, 0.3538]Repeated measure mixed model
Comparison: For parietal lobe, APOE Epsilon-4 status negativep-value: 0.552195% CI: [-0.244, 0.4516]Repeated measure mixed model
Comparison: For posterior temporal lobe, APOE Epsilon-4 status positivep-value: 0.17695% CI: [-0.064, 0.3409]Repeated measure mixed model
Comparison: For posterior temporal lobe, APOE Epsilon-4 status negativep-value: 0.595295% CI: [-0.2303, 0.3978]Repeated measure mixed model
Comparison: For Cerebellum, APOE Epsilon-4 status positivep-value: 0.402595% CI: [-0.1169, 0.2863]Repeated measure mixed model
Comparison: For Cerebellum, APOE Epsilon-4 status negativep-value: 0.308195% CI: [-0.1458, 0.453]Repeated measure mixed model95
Comparison: For medial temporal lobe, APOE Epsilon-4 status positivep-value: 0.296495% CI: [-0.0758, 0.2436]Repeated measure mixed model
Comparison: For medial temporal lobe, APOE Epsilon-4 status negativep-value: 0.210195% CI: [-0.0892, 0.3963]Repeated measure mixed model
Secondary

Number of Participants by Apo-lipoprotein -e (APOE Epsilon)-4 Allele Subtype

Participants were categorized into two major types namely those with APOE4 genotype and without APOE4 genotype. Further, 6 subtypes/ alleles of APOE4 gene (as mentioned in the categories below) were analyzed. Participants were also classified as having 0 or 1 or 2 copies of this gene.

Time frame: Up to 12 months

Population: PGx population included all ITT participants with evaluable PGx data (had consented to genotyping, provided and identified blood sample for genotyping and were successfully genotyped for at least one of the genetic markers under study). Only those participants available at time of assessment were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PlaceboNumber of Participants by Apo-lipoprotein -e (APOE Epsilon)-4 Allele SubtypeWith E3E4 allele17 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants by Apo-lipoprotein -e (APOE Epsilon)-4 Allele SubtypeWith E2E3 allele1 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants by Apo-lipoprotein -e (APOE Epsilon)-4 Allele SubtypeWith E4E4 allele7 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants by Apo-lipoprotein -e (APOE Epsilon)-4 Allele SubtypeWith E2E2 allele0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants by Apo-lipoprotein -e (APOE Epsilon)-4 Allele SubtypeWith E2E4 allele0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants by Apo-lipoprotein -e (APOE Epsilon)-4 Allele Subtype2 copies of APOE4 gene7 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants by Apo-lipoprotein -e (APOE Epsilon)-4 Allele SubtypeWithout APOE4 gene6 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants by Apo-lipoprotein -e (APOE Epsilon)-4 Allele Subtype1 copies of APOE4 gene17 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants by Apo-lipoprotein -e (APOE Epsilon)-4 Allele SubtypeWith E3E3 allele5 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants by Apo-lipoprotein -e (APOE Epsilon)-4 Allele Subtype0 copies of APOE4 gene6 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants by Apo-lipoprotein -e (APOE Epsilon)-4 Allele SubtypeWith APOE4 gene24 Participants
RosiglitazoneNumber of Participants by Apo-lipoprotein -e (APOE Epsilon)-4 Allele Subtype0 copies of APOE4 gene14 Participants
RosiglitazoneNumber of Participants by Apo-lipoprotein -e (APOE Epsilon)-4 Allele SubtypeWith APOE4 gene15 Participants
RosiglitazoneNumber of Participants by Apo-lipoprotein -e (APOE Epsilon)-4 Allele SubtypeWithout APOE4 gene14 Participants
RosiglitazoneNumber of Participants by Apo-lipoprotein -e (APOE Epsilon)-4 Allele SubtypeWith E4E4 allele6 Participants
RosiglitazoneNumber of Participants by Apo-lipoprotein -e (APOE Epsilon)-4 Allele SubtypeWith E3E4 allele8 Participants
RosiglitazoneNumber of Participants by Apo-lipoprotein -e (APOE Epsilon)-4 Allele SubtypeWith E2E4 allele1 Participants
RosiglitazoneNumber of Participants by Apo-lipoprotein -e (APOE Epsilon)-4 Allele SubtypeWith E3E3 allele12 Participants
RosiglitazoneNumber of Participants by Apo-lipoprotein -e (APOE Epsilon)-4 Allele SubtypeWith E2E3 allele1 Participants
RosiglitazoneNumber of Participants by Apo-lipoprotein -e (APOE Epsilon)-4 Allele SubtypeWith E2E2 allele1 Participants
RosiglitazoneNumber of Participants by Apo-lipoprotein -e (APOE Epsilon)-4 Allele Subtype2 copies of APOE4 gene6 Participants
RosiglitazoneNumber of Participants by Apo-lipoprotein -e (APOE Epsilon)-4 Allele Subtype1 copies of APOE4 gene9 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Abnormal 12-lead Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters at Screening and Follow-up

Two screening visits were arranged within 30 days of Day 1 of screening period and within 7 to 10 days of Day 1 of screening period. Follow-up period was arranged within 14 days of the last dose (post 12 months) of the study drug. Data for only the participants with abnormal ECG values has been presented.

Time frame: At screening (within 1 month of Day 1) and follow-up period (within 2 weeks of final dose [12 months])

Population: All subjects population.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormal 12-lead Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters at Screening and Follow-upAt screening18 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormal 12-lead Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters at Screening and Follow-upAt follow-up5 Participants
RosiglitazoneNumber of Participants With Abnormal 12-lead Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters at Screening and Follow-upAt screening18 Participants
RosiglitazoneNumber of Participants With Abnormal 12-lead Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters at Screening and Follow-upAt follow-up10 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

Adverse event (AE) is an unfavorable change in the health of a participant, including abnormal laboratory findings, that happens during a clinical study or within a certain time period after the study has ended. This change may or may not be caused by the intervention being studied. Serious adverse event (SAE) is an adverse event that results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or extends a current hospital stay, results in an ongoing or significant incapacity or interferes substantially with normal life functions, or causes a congenital anomaly or birth defect. Medical events that do not result in death, are not life-threatening, or do not require hospitalization may be considered serious adverse events if they put the participant in danger or require medical or surgical intervention to prevent one of the results listed above.

Time frame: Up to 12 months

Population: All subjects population included all randomized subjects who receive at least one dose of study drug.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)Any AE32 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)Any SAE6 Participants
RosiglitazoneNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)Any AE33 Participants
RosiglitazoneNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)Any SAE4 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Body Weight and Height Outside the Clinical Concern at Month 12

Body weight and height are the parameters of physical examination. Body weight is also a measure of fluid retention. Body weight increase or decrease of \>= 7 % was considered as of clinical concern. Since there would be no or negligible (insignificant) change in height of a participant, no data has been presented for change from Baseline in height of participants after exposure to the study drug.

Time frame: At Month 12

Population: All subjects population. Only those participants available at the time of assessment were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Body Weight and Height Outside the Clinical Concern at Month 12Decrease from Baseline >=7%2 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Body Weight and Height Outside the Clinical Concern at Month 12Increase from Baseline >=7%2 Participants
RosiglitazoneNumber of Participants With Body Weight and Height Outside the Clinical Concern at Month 12Increase from Baseline >=7%5 Participants
RosiglitazoneNumber of Participants With Body Weight and Height Outside the Clinical Concern at Month 12Decrease from Baseline >=7%2 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Clinical Chemistry Data of PCC at End of the Treatment (Month 12)

Participants were analyzed for any abnormality in albumin, alanine aminotransferases, alkaline phosphatase, apolipoprotein A, apolipoprotein B, aspartate aminotransferases, Vitamin B12, direct bilirubin, indirect bilirubin, total bilirubin, cholesterol, creatinine, C-reactive protein, serum glucose, and non-fasting glucose, with data of PCC range. The values higher (H) or lower (L) than the reference range were analyzed at each month. The parameter has not been presented for participants who did not have any abnormality.

Time frame: At Month 12

Population: All subjects population. Only the participants available at the time of assessment were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Clinical Chemistry Data of PCC at End of the Treatment (Month 12)Direct bilirubin, H1 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Clinical Chemistry Data of PCC at End of the Treatment (Month 12)Cholesterol, H1 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Clinical Chemistry Data of PCC at End of the Treatment (Month 12)Glucose, H1 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Clinical Chemistry Data of PCC at End of the Treatment (Month 12)Low density lipoprotein cholesterol, H2 Participants
RosiglitazoneNumber of Participants With Clinical Chemistry Data of PCC at End of the Treatment (Month 12)Low density lipoprotein cholesterol, H5 Participants
RosiglitazoneNumber of Participants With Clinical Chemistry Data of PCC at End of the Treatment (Month 12)Direct bilirubin, H0 Participants
RosiglitazoneNumber of Participants With Clinical Chemistry Data of PCC at End of the Treatment (Month 12)Glucose, H0 Participants
RosiglitazoneNumber of Participants With Clinical Chemistry Data of PCC at End of the Treatment (Month 12)Cholesterol, H0 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Heart Rate/ Pulse Rate Outside the Concern Range at Month 12

Heart rate was measured in supine position. Number of participants with any time on-treatment values of heart rate values outside the clinical concern were presented. Heart rate values of \>100 or \<50 were considered as of clinical concern. Increase in heart rate from Baseline of \>=30 beats per minute (bpm) and decrease in heart rate from Baseline of \>=30 bpm was also recorded and presented.

Time frame: At Month 12

Population: All subjects population. Only those participants available at the time of assessment were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Heart Rate/ Pulse Rate Outside the Concern Range at Month 12Heart rate >100 or <504 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Heart Rate/ Pulse Rate Outside the Concern Range at Month 12Increase in heart rate from Baseline of >=302 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Heart Rate/ Pulse Rate Outside the Concern Range at Month 12Dncrease in heart rate from Baseline of >=300 Participants
RosiglitazoneNumber of Participants With Heart Rate/ Pulse Rate Outside the Concern Range at Month 12Heart rate >100 or <503 Participants
RosiglitazoneNumber of Participants With Heart Rate/ Pulse Rate Outside the Concern Range at Month 12Increase in heart rate from Baseline of >=304 Participants
RosiglitazoneNumber of Participants With Heart Rate/ Pulse Rate Outside the Concern Range at Month 12Dncrease in heart rate from Baseline of >=300 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Hematological Data of Potential Clinical Concern (PCC) at End of Treatment (Month 12)

Participants were analyzed for any abnormality in basophils, eosinophils, hemoglobin, lymphocytes, monocytes, neutrophils, segmented neutrophils, platelets, red blood cells, and white blood cells with data outside the respective reference ranges. The values higher (H) or lower (L) than the reference range were analyzed at each month. The parameter has not been presented for participants who did not have any abnormality.

Time frame: At Month 12

Population: All subjects population. Only the participants available at the time of assessment were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Hematological Data of Potential Clinical Concern (PCC) at End of Treatment (Month 12)Neutrophils, Month 12, L0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Hematological Data of Potential Clinical Concern (PCC) at End of Treatment (Month 12)White cells, Month 12, L1 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Hematological Data of Potential Clinical Concern (PCC) at End of Treatment (Month 12)Platelets, Month 12, L0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Hematological Data of Potential Clinical Concern (PCC) at End of Treatment (Month 12)Lymphoctes percentage, Month 12, L1 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Hematological Data of Potential Clinical Concern (PCC) at End of Treatment (Month 12)Hemoglobin, Month 12, L0 Participants
RosiglitazoneNumber of Participants With Hematological Data of Potential Clinical Concern (PCC) at End of Treatment (Month 12)Lymphoctes percentage, Month 12, L0 Participants
RosiglitazoneNumber of Participants With Hematological Data of Potential Clinical Concern (PCC) at End of Treatment (Month 12)Hemoglobin, Month 12, L1 Participants
RosiglitazoneNumber of Participants With Hematological Data of Potential Clinical Concern (PCC) at End of Treatment (Month 12)Neutrophils, Month 12, L1 Participants
RosiglitazoneNumber of Participants With Hematological Data of Potential Clinical Concern (PCC) at End of Treatment (Month 12)Platelets, Month 12, L1 Participants
RosiglitazoneNumber of Participants With Hematological Data of Potential Clinical Concern (PCC) at End of Treatment (Month 12)White cells, Month 12, L1 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) Outside the Concern Range at Month 12

Number of participants with SBP or DBP outside the defined range of clinical concern were collectively presented for any time on-treatment period. SBP of \<90 millimeters of mercury (mmHg) and \>140 mmHg was considered as of clinical concern. DBP of \<50 and \>90 mmHg was considered as of clinical concern. Increase in SBP from Baseline of \>=40 mmHg and Decrease of \>=30 mmHg was also recorded. Increase in DBP from Baseline of \>=30 mmHg and Decrease of \>=20 mmHg was also recorded.

Time frame: At Month 12

Population: All subjects population. Only the participants available at the time of assessment were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) Outside the Concern Range at Month 12SBP, >140 or <9020 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) Outside the Concern Range at Month 12SBP, Increase from Baseline>=401 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) Outside the Concern Range at Month 12SBP, Decrease from Baseline>=3012 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) Outside the Concern Range at Month 12DBP, >90 or <505 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) Outside the Concern Range at Month 12DBP, Increase from Baseline>=301 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) Outside the Concern Range at Month 12DBP, Decrease from Baseline>=203 Participants
RosiglitazoneNumber of Participants With Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) Outside the Concern Range at Month 12DBP, Increase from Baseline>=301 Participants
RosiglitazoneNumber of Participants With Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) Outside the Concern Range at Month 12SBP, >140 or <9023 Participants
RosiglitazoneNumber of Participants With Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) Outside the Concern Range at Month 12DBP, >90 or <502 Participants
RosiglitazoneNumber of Participants With Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) Outside the Concern Range at Month 12SBP, Increase from Baseline>=403 Participants
RosiglitazoneNumber of Participants With Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) Outside the Concern Range at Month 12DBP, Decrease from Baseline>=207 Participants
RosiglitazoneNumber of Participants With Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) Outside the Concern Range at Month 12SBP, Decrease from Baseline>=3013 Participants
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline in Brain Volume Over Period

Percent volume change of brain is a function of global changes in brain structure. Reduction in brain volume is indicative of reduction in Grey matter and thus the AD stage. The method used was structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Baseline value was recorded on Day 1. Change from Baseline is the value at indicated time point minus the Baseline value. Arithmetic means have been presented; however, statistical analysis is based upon the LS means.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1), Month 6, and Month 12

Population: ITT population. Only those participants available at the time of assessment were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline in Brain Volume Over PeriodMonth 6-0.9 Percent changeStandard Deviation 0.62
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline in Brain Volume Over PeriodMonth 12-2.4 Percent changeStandard Deviation 1.4
RosiglitazonePercent Change From Baseline in Brain Volume Over PeriodMonth 6-1.4 Percent changeStandard Deviation 0.94
RosiglitazonePercent Change From Baseline in Brain Volume Over PeriodMonth 12-2.6 Percent changeStandard Deviation 1.48
Comparison: For Month 6p-value: 0.012995% CI: [-1, -0.1]Repeated measure mixed model
Comparison: For Month 12p-value: 0.560795% CI: [-1, 0.6]Repeated measure mixed model

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026