Skip to content

Palladium-103 Seed Implant and Single Daily Dosing of Uroxatral Vs. Twice Daily Dosing of Flomax- A 3 Month Retrospective Efficacy Analysis

Palladium-103 Seed Implant and Single Daily Dosing of Uroxatral Vs Twice Daily Dosing of Flomax-A 3 Month Retrospective Efficacy Analysis

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00264017
Enrollment
60
Registered
2005-12-12
Start date
2005-11-30
Completion date
2005-11-30
Last updated
2005-12-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Prostate Cancer Patients Undergoing External Radiation and Seed Implantation

Brief summary

In the past ten years, newer drugs with more selective affinity for the alpha-receptor have been introduced. Alfuzosin (Uroxatral) and Tamulosin(Flomax are two second generation alpha-blockers. In the course of our clinical proctice, both drugs have been used routinely. This retrospective comparison is intended to be a priliminary comparison of their effectiveness and side effects.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Sanofi
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Dattoli Cancer Center and Brachytherapy Research Institute
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
DEFINED_POPULATION
Time perspective
RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
45 Years to 80 Years

Inclusion criteria

* Males age 45-80 years * Diagnosis of prostate cancer * Status post IMRT and Palladium-103 seed implantation and initiated alpha blocker therapy with alfuzosin10mg daily or tamulosin 0.4mg bid at time of seed implantation * Baseline AUA score\< or =12 * May be on antiandrogenand/or alpha reductase therapy * Patients receiving IMRT followed by Palladium-103 Brachytherapy implantation as the primary therapy for prostate cancer with curatives intent -

Exclusion criteria

* History of insulin-dependent diabetes * Uncontrolled hypertention * History of symptomtic hypotension (including syncope and dizziness) * Pre-existing obstructive uropathy based on history of BPH and or Acute Urinary Retention * Pre-existing prostatitis either continuous or intermittent * Concurrent use of any other anticholinergics * previous or concurrent usage of LHRH agonist

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026