Skip to content

Lapatinib for Brain Metastases In ErbB2-Positive Breast Cancer

A Phase II Study of Lapatinib for Brain Metastases in Subjects With ErbB2-Positive Breast Cancer Following Trastuzumab-based Systemic Therapy and Cranial Radiotherapy

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00263588
Enrollment
242
Registered
2005-12-09
Start date
2005-12-02
Completion date
2018-03-15
Last updated
2019-12-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Neoplasms, Breast

Keywords

breast cancer, brain metastases, ErbB2 positive, HER2 positive, neoplasms, cancer, lapatinib, LAP016A2202, LAP016A, CLAP016A2202, GW572016

Brief summary

Determine how safe and effective lapatinib is when used to treat patients with ErbB2 overexpressing breast cancer that has spread to the brain and is still progressing there even after radiation treatment using WBRT (whole brain radiotherapy) or SRS (stereotactic radiosurgery) to the brain. Lapatinib is an oral drug that will be taken every day. Tests for safety and efficacy will be performed every 4 weeks or 8 weeks (depending on the test) during the course of the study.

Interventions

DRUGlapatinib

tyrosine kinase inhibitor

Sponsors

Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Signed Informed Consent * ErbB2(HER2)overexpressing breast cancer. * Brain lesion(s) which are progressing. * Prior treatment of brain metastases with Whole Brain Radiotherapy (WBR)and/or Stereotactic Radiosurgery (SRS). * Prior treatment with trastuzumab (Herceptin), either alone or in combination with chemotherapy. * Cardiac ejection fraction(LVEF)within the institutional range of normal as measured by Echocardiogram. * Able to swallow an oral medication. * Adequate kidney and liver function. * Adequate bone marrow function.

Exclusion criteria

* Pregnant or lactating females. * Conditions that would effect the absorption of an oral drug. * History of immediate or delayed hypersensitivity reaction to gadolinium contrast agents. * Pre-existing severe cerebral vascular disease, such as stroke involving a major vessel. * Serious medical or psychiatric disorder that would interfere with the patient's safety or informed consent.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The Number of Participants With Central Nervous System (CNS) Best Overall Responsetime from baseline to data cutoff (25 Sept 2007); approximately 2 yearsSummary of CNS Objective Response (Lapatinib Monotherapy - MITT Population) Response to lapatinib in patients with progressive brain metastases from ErbB2-overexpressing breast cancer. The primary indicator of drug efficacy was CNS objective response rate. A CNS objective response was defined as either a Complete response (CR) or Partial response (PR), as assessed by volumetric analysis of brain Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), provided there was no progression of systemic disease outside of the CNS, increasing steroid requirements, or worsening of Neurological signs and symptoms (NSS) A CNS objective response rate was defined as a 50% volumetric reduction in sum of CNS target lesions, with no new or progressive CNS or non-CNS lesions, no increases in tumor-related steroid requirements and no worsening of neurological signs or symptoms
The Percentage of Participants With Central Nervous System (CNS) Objective Response Rate - Response Rate (CR + PR)time from baseline to data cutoff (25 Sept 2007); approximately 2 yearsSummary of CNS Objective Response (the Complete Response + Partial Response)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Duration of Central Nervous System (CNS) Objective Responsetime from baseline to data cutoff (25 Sept 2007); approximately 2 yearsThe duration of CNS objective response, defined as the time from first CNS Objective response until tumor progression at any site or death due to any cause. A CNS objective response was defined as either a Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR), as assessed by volumetric analysis of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), provided there was no progression of systemic disease outside of the CNS, increasing steroid requirements, or worsening of tumor-related neurological signs or symptoms.
Percentage of Patients With CNS Disease Control (Complete Response, Partial Response or Stable Disease) at 6 Months of Lapatinib Therapyfrom Start of lapatinib to 6 monthsThe CNS disease control rate, defined as the percentage of subjects with CR, PR or stable disease at Week 24
Time to Progression (TTP) at Any Sitetime from baseline to data cutoff (25 Sept 2007); approximately 2 yearsSummary of Kaplan-Meier Estimates for Progression Free Survival at Any Site
Percentage of Participants With Improvement in Neurological Signs and Symptoms (NSS) Measured Using the Neurological Examination Worksheettime from baseline to data cutoff (25 Sept 2007); approximately 2 yearsPhysician-reported NSS worksheet is derived from 13 AEs and measured by NCI CTCAE v3.0 grouped into 7 categories: level of consciousness, neurological symptoms, cranial nerves, language, strength, sensation, & ataxia. Improvement of NSS required: Decrease by 1 or more grades from baseline of any tumor-related NSS, with confirmation at least 4 wks later, No development or worsening in any tumor-related NSS during interval, No radiographic evidence of CNS progression (assessed by volumetric MRI) or systemic (non-CNS) progression (assessed by RECIST) during interval, Stable or decreasing steroids during interval as defined by GSK equivalent doses of an alternative corticosteroid or a dose increase for non-tumor related reasons didn't constitute a steroid increase. Improvement in any non-tumor associated NSS didn't constitute improvement in NSS. Neurological exam, using Neurological Examination Worksheet was assessed at baseline & each 4 wks. Categories below are not mutually exclusive.
Summary of Site of First Progressiontime from baseline to data cutoff (25 Sept 2007); approximately 2 yearsbaseline to time of disease progression or death
Primary Cause of Deathtime from baseline to data cutoff (25 Sept 2007); approximately 2 yearsSummary of Overall All-cause mortality (Main Study and Extension)
Overall Survival (OS)time from baseline to data cutoff (25 Sept 2007); approximately 2 yearsOverall survival (OS) defined as the time from initiation of investigational product to death due to any cause.
Percentage of Subjects With a CNS Objective Response or Improvement in Baseline Neurological Signs and Symptoms (NSS)baseline and weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48Summary of Proportion of Subjects with a CNS Objective Response or Improvement in Baseline NSS

Countries

Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Greece, India, Italy, Japan, Poland, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Taiwan, United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

The Intent-to-Treat (ITT) Population: all subjects who received at least one dose of study medication Modified ITT (MITT) Population: all subjects who received at least four doses (750 mg lapatinib twice daily for two days) of study medication and who had measurable brain metastases (≥1 cm in diameter) at baseline assessment

Pre-assignment details

Main phase: ITT 95 in Cohort A, 147 in Cohort B. MITT, 94 in Cohort A, and 143 subjects in Cohort B Optional open-label extension phase: 51 subjects. Long-term follow up (LTFU) Protocol amendment added on 15-Apr-2013

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Cohorts A
Overall - Main Study and Extension Phase - 750 mg lapatinib administered orally twice daily Cohort A subjects had Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0-1, and one or two prior trastuzumab-containing regimens, in total, for treatment of breast cancer in adjuvant and/or metastatic settings.
95
Cohort B
750mg lapatinib administered orally twice daily. Cohort B subjects had ECOG performance status 2 and/or more than 2 prior trastuzumab-containing regimens for treatment of breast cancer in the adjuvant and/or metastatic settings.
147
Total242

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyDeath5490
Overall Studydisease progression, coma, 1 unknown1011
Overall StudyInvestigator decision715
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up710
Overall StudyProtocol Violation01
Overall StudySponsor terminated study01
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject34

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicCohorts ACohort BTotal
Age, Continuous50.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.33
49.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.73
49.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.53
Age, Customized
18-64 years
242
85 Participants135 Participants220 Participants
Age, Customized
<18 years
242
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Customized
65-84 years
242
10 Participants11 Participants21 Participants
Age, Customized
>85 years
242
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
African American/African
3 Participants4 Participants7 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
American Indian/Alaskan Native
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asia - East
1 Participants4 Participants5 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian - Central/South
0 Participants3 Participants3 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian - Japanese
6 Participants0 Participants6 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian - South-East Asian
1 Participants2 Participants3 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Mixed race
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Unknown
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White - Arabic/North African
0 Participants2 Participants2 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White - White/ Caucasian/European
83 Participants129 Participants212 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
94 Participants147 Participants241 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
78 / 95128 / 147
other
Total, other adverse events
90 / 95131 / 147
serious
Total, serious adverse events
36 / 9552 / 147

Outcome results

Primary

The Number of Participants With Central Nervous System (CNS) Best Overall Response

Summary of CNS Objective Response (Lapatinib Monotherapy - MITT Population) Response to lapatinib in patients with progressive brain metastases from ErbB2-overexpressing breast cancer. The primary indicator of drug efficacy was CNS objective response rate. A CNS objective response was defined as either a Complete response (CR) or Partial response (PR), as assessed by volumetric analysis of brain Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), provided there was no progression of systemic disease outside of the CNS, increasing steroid requirements, or worsening of Neurological signs and symptoms (NSS) A CNS objective response rate was defined as a 50% volumetric reduction in sum of CNS target lesions, with no new or progressive CNS or non-CNS lesions, no increases in tumor-related steroid requirements and no worsening of neurological signs or symptoms

Time frame: time from baseline to data cutoff (25 Sept 2007); approximately 2 years

Population: Modified ITT (MITT) Population is defined as all subjects who received at least four doses (750 mg lapatinib 2x daily for 2 days) of study medication and who had measurable brain metastases (greater than or equal to 1cm in diameter) at baseline assessment. MITT was the primary population for analysis of efficacy data in lapatinib monotherapy arm.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Cohort AThe Number of Participants With Central Nervous System (CNS) Best Overall ResponsePartial response (PR)6 Participants
Cohort AThe Number of Participants With Central Nervous System (CNS) Best Overall ResponseProgressive disease (PD)40 Participants
Cohort AThe Number of Participants With Central Nervous System (CNS) Best Overall ResponseStable disease (SD)40 Participants
Cohort AThe Number of Participants With Central Nervous System (CNS) Best Overall ResponseUnknown8 Participants
Cohort AThe Number of Participants With Central Nervous System (CNS) Best Overall ResponseComplete response (CR)0 Participants
Cohort BThe Number of Participants With Central Nervous System (CNS) Best Overall ResponseUnknown18 Participants
Cohort BThe Number of Participants With Central Nervous System (CNS) Best Overall ResponseComplete response (CR)0 Participants
Cohort BThe Number of Participants With Central Nervous System (CNS) Best Overall ResponsePartial response (PR)9 Participants
Cohort BThe Number of Participants With Central Nervous System (CNS) Best Overall ResponseStable disease (SD)46 Participants
Cohort BThe Number of Participants With Central Nervous System (CNS) Best Overall ResponseProgressive disease (PD)70 Participants
Primary

The Percentage of Participants With Central Nervous System (CNS) Objective Response Rate - Response Rate (CR + PR)

Summary of CNS Objective Response (the Complete Response + Partial Response)

Time frame: time from baseline to data cutoff (25 Sept 2007); approximately 2 years

Population: Modified ITT (MITT) Population is defined as all subjects who received at least four doses (750 mg lapatinib 2x daily for 2 days) of study medication and who had measurable brain metastases (greater than or equal to 1cm in diameter) at baseline assessment. MITT was the primary population for analysis of efficacy data in lapatinib monotherapy arm.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Cohort AThe Percentage of Participants With Central Nervous System (CNS) Objective Response Rate - Response Rate (CR + PR)6 percentage of participants
Cohort BThe Percentage of Participants With Central Nervous System (CNS) Objective Response Rate - Response Rate (CR + PR)6 percentage of participants
Secondary

Duration of Central Nervous System (CNS) Objective Response

The duration of CNS objective response, defined as the time from first CNS Objective response until tumor progression at any site or death due to any cause. A CNS objective response was defined as either a Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR), as assessed by volumetric analysis of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), provided there was no progression of systemic disease outside of the CNS, increasing steroid requirements, or worsening of tumor-related neurological signs or symptoms.

Time frame: time from baseline to data cutoff (25 Sept 2007); approximately 2 years

Population: Lapatinib monotherapy MITT

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Cohort ADuration of Central Nervous System (CNS) Objective Response2.43 months
Cohort BDuration of Central Nervous System (CNS) Objective Response1.58 months
Secondary

Overall Survival (OS)

Overall survival (OS) defined as the time from initiation of investigational product to death due to any cause.

Time frame: time from baseline to data cutoff (25 Sept 2007); approximately 2 years

Population: Lapatinib Monotherapy MITT

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Cohort AOverall Survival (OS)10.78 months
Cohort BOverall Survival (OS)5.82 months
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Improvement in Neurological Signs and Symptoms (NSS) Measured Using the Neurological Examination Worksheet

Physician-reported NSS worksheet is derived from 13 AEs and measured by NCI CTCAE v3.0 grouped into 7 categories: level of consciousness, neurological symptoms, cranial nerves, language, strength, sensation, & ataxia. Improvement of NSS required: Decrease by 1 or more grades from baseline of any tumor-related NSS, with confirmation at least 4 wks later, No development or worsening in any tumor-related NSS during interval, No radiographic evidence of CNS progression (assessed by volumetric MRI) or systemic (non-CNS) progression (assessed by RECIST) during interval, Stable or decreasing steroids during interval as defined by GSK equivalent doses of an alternative corticosteroid or a dose increase for non-tumor related reasons didn't constitute a steroid increase. Improvement in any non-tumor associated NSS didn't constitute improvement in NSS. Neurological exam, using Neurological Examination Worksheet was assessed at baseline & each 4 wks. Categories below are not mutually exclusive.

Time frame: time from baseline to data cutoff (25 Sept 2007); approximately 2 years

Population: MITT population~Analysis was performed on combined cohorts in order to have a sufficient sample size to analyze association of CNS Volumetric Change from Baseline and NSS Improvement

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Cohort APercentage of Participants With Improvement in Neurological Signs and Symptoms (NSS) Measured Using the Neurological Examination WorksheetSubjects with NSS improvement24 Participants
Cohort APercentage of Participants With Improvement in Neurological Signs and Symptoms (NSS) Measured Using the Neurological Examination Worksheet>=20% volumetric reduction of lesion8 Participants
Cohort APercentage of Participants With Improvement in Neurological Signs and Symptoms (NSS) Measured Using the Neurological Examination Worksheetany volumetric reduction of lesion14 Participants
Cohort APercentage of Participants With Improvement in Neurological Signs and Symptoms (NSS) Measured Using the Neurological Examination Worksheetvolumetric increase or withdrew9 Participants
Secondary

Percentage of Patients With CNS Disease Control (Complete Response, Partial Response or Stable Disease) at 6 Months of Lapatinib Therapy

The CNS disease control rate, defined as the percentage of subjects with CR, PR or stable disease at Week 24

Time frame: from Start of lapatinib to 6 months

Population: MITT

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Cohort APercentage of Patients With CNS Disease Control (Complete Response, Partial Response or Stable Disease) at 6 Months of Lapatinib Therapy9 percentage of participants
Cohort BPercentage of Patients With CNS Disease Control (Complete Response, Partial Response or Stable Disease) at 6 Months of Lapatinib Therapy2 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Subjects With a CNS Objective Response or Improvement in Baseline Neurological Signs and Symptoms (NSS)

Summary of Proportion of Subjects with a CNS Objective Response or Improvement in Baseline NSS

Time frame: baseline and weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48

Population: MITT

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Cohort APercentage of Subjects With a CNS Objective Response or Improvement in Baseline Neurological Signs and Symptoms (NSS)week 823 percentage of participants
Cohort APercentage of Subjects With a CNS Objective Response or Improvement in Baseline Neurological Signs and Symptoms (NSS)week 162 percentage of participants
Cohort APercentage of Subjects With a CNS Objective Response or Improvement in Baseline Neurological Signs and Symptoms (NSS)week 248 percentage of participants
Cohort APercentage of Subjects With a CNS Objective Response or Improvement in Baseline Neurological Signs and Symptoms (NSS)week 3217 percentage of participants
Cohort APercentage of Subjects With a CNS Objective Response or Improvement in Baseline Neurological Signs and Symptoms (NSS)week 400.0 percentage of participants
Cohort APercentage of Subjects With a CNS Objective Response or Improvement in Baseline Neurological Signs and Symptoms (NSS)week 480.0 percentage of participants
Cohort BPercentage of Subjects With a CNS Objective Response or Improvement in Baseline Neurological Signs and Symptoms (NSS)week 400.0 percentage of participants
Cohort BPercentage of Subjects With a CNS Objective Response or Improvement in Baseline Neurological Signs and Symptoms (NSS)week 814 percentage of participants
Cohort BPercentage of Subjects With a CNS Objective Response or Improvement in Baseline Neurological Signs and Symptoms (NSS)week 320.0 percentage of participants
Cohort BPercentage of Subjects With a CNS Objective Response or Improvement in Baseline Neurological Signs and Symptoms (NSS)week 168 percentage of participants
Cohort BPercentage of Subjects With a CNS Objective Response or Improvement in Baseline Neurological Signs and Symptoms (NSS)week 480.0 percentage of participants
Cohort BPercentage of Subjects With a CNS Objective Response or Improvement in Baseline Neurological Signs and Symptoms (NSS)week 2411 percentage of participants
Secondary

Primary Cause of Death

Summary of Overall All-cause mortality (Main Study and Extension)

Time frame: time from baseline to data cutoff (25 Sept 2007); approximately 2 years

Population: ITT

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Cohort APrimary Cause of DeathOther4 Participants
Cohort APrimary Cause of DeathDisease under study74 Participants
Cohort BPrimary Cause of DeathDisease under study124 Participants
Cohort BPrimary Cause of DeathOther4 Participants
Secondary

Summary of Site of First Progression

baseline to time of disease progression or death

Time frame: time from baseline to data cutoff (25 Sept 2007); approximately 2 years

Population: MITT

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Cohort ASummary of Site of First ProgressionCNS progression69 Participants
Cohort ASummary of Site of First ProgressionNon-CNS prgression1 Participants
Cohort ASummary of Site of First ProgressionCNS and Non-CNS progression12 Participants
Cohort BSummary of Site of First ProgressionCNS progression72 Participants
Cohort BSummary of Site of First ProgressionNon-CNS prgression10 Participants
Cohort BSummary of Site of First ProgressionCNS and Non-CNS progression36 Participants
Secondary

Time to Progression (TTP) at Any Site

Summary of Kaplan-Meier Estimates for Progression Free Survival at Any Site

Time frame: time from baseline to data cutoff (25 Sept 2007); approximately 2 years

Population: Lapatinib Monotherapy MITT

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Cohort ATime to Progression (TTP) at Any Site2.60 months
Cohort BTime to Progression (TTP) at Any Site1.87 months

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026