Skip to content

Inhalation of Liposomal Amphotericin B to Prevent Invasive Aspergillosis

Nebulized Liposomal Amphotericin B (Ambisome) Versus Nebulized Placebo for the Prophylaxis of Invasive Pulmonary Aspergillosis in Haematological Patients With Prolonged Neutropenia. A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00263315
Enrollment
320
Registered
2005-12-08
Start date
2000-01-31
Completion date
2006-05-31
Last updated
2006-08-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Aspergillosis

Keywords

aspergillosis, mycosis, neutropenia, primary prevention, hematologic diseases, amphotericin B, AmBisome, liposomal amphotericin B

Brief summary

A Phase II/III randomized double-blind study comparing the safety and the efficacy of a weekly administration of 25 mg nebulized AmBisome with nebulized placebo solution to prevent invasive pulmonary aspergillosis in neutropenic hemato-oncologic patients.

Detailed description

The morbidity, mortality and costs of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis (IPA) in neutropenic patients are high. An effective intervention to prevent IPA would therefore be welcome. The incidence of IPA in neutropenic hematology patients in our institution was recently estimated to be 5-10%. Currently, only HEPA filtration is routinely used for the prevention of IPA. In 1988, Schmitt et al. showed a significant delayed mortality in rat model of IPA when rats were treated with aerosolized conventional amphotericin-B (amB) two days before infection (1). Conventional amB may interfere with surfactant function in the lungs. In contrast, liposomal amphotericin-B contains phospholipids that are structurally related to surfactant and inhibits natural surfactant function only slightly. Furthermore, in rats, mean concentrations of AmB in lungs were 3.7 times higher at day one and almost 6 times higher at day seven after a single dose treatment with aerosolized liposomal amB when compared with conventional AmB (2). Only one non-placebo controlled randomized clinical trial evaluated the prophylactic use of inhalation therapy with conventional amB for the prevention of IPA and a non-significant 43% reduction was observed (3). We postulate that the weekly inhalation of liposomal AmB in neutropenic hematology patients can prevent IPA. In this randomised placebo controlled clinical trial we compare the safety and efficacy of the administration of nebulized liposomal AmB (2x/week) with placebo for the prevention of IPA in haematological patients with an expected duration of neutropenia of \>10d. To demonstrate a reduction in incidence of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis from 7% to 1%, a total of 170 neutropenic episodes in each arm will be included (power 80%, two-tailed alfa=0.05). The primary efficacy endpoint is the cumulative percentage of patients developing a proven or probable IPA. Per protocol serum galactomannan levels are monitored 2x/week and a HR-CT of the lungs will be performed for unexplained fever (\>5d) unresponsive to broad-spectrum antibiotic therapy. EORTC/MSG criteria are used for diagnosis of IPA. The primary safety endpoint is a premature discontinuation of the study drug for \>1week due to intolerance.

Interventions

DRUGnebulised liposomal amphotericin B

Sponsors

Gilead Sciences
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Nexstar Pharmaceuticals
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Erasmus Medical Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
DOUBLE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Male or female hospitalized patients aged \> 18 yr 2. The patient has a hematologic malignancy or will receive a bone-marrow transplant 3. The patient starts with a course of chemotherapy within 4 days or is already neutropenic at admission 4. The expected duration of severe neutropenia (PMN\<0.5x10\*9/L) following study entry is \> 10 days 5. The patient is receiving oral antibiotic prophylaxis and fluconazole 6. Written informed consent has been obtained

Exclusion criteria

1. The patient shows evidence of a pulmonary fungal infection or a fungal sinusitis at trial entry 2. The concomitant use of systemic anti-aspergillus treatment such as itraconazole or any intravenous formulation of amphotericin B at study entry 3. Known hypersensitivity to amphotericin B 4. Any evidence of pneumonia or pneumonitis at trial entry 5. Any impossibility to use a nebulizer properly 6. Expected survival \< 3 months at entry 7. Pregnancy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
SAFETY: Discontinuation for >1week due to intolerance
EFFICACY: Proven/probable invasive pulmonary aspergillosis

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Any probably or definitely related AE by type and severity (CTC grade > 2)
Requirement of pre-medication to tolerate nebulization of the study drug
Spirometric changes after inhalation
EFFICACY STUDY:
SAFETY STUDY:
A confirmed positive serum galactomannan concentration of 0.5 ng/ml or more
The use of systemic antifungal drugs (days) during the neutropenic episodes
The number of days of fever of unknown origin during neutropenia
Mortality due to a pulmonary fungal infection
Proven, probable or possible invasive pulmonary aspergillosis
A probably or definitely related AE of the respiratory tract (CTC grade > 2)

Countries

Netherlands

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026