Skip to content

Study of Lopinavir/Ritonavir Tablets Versus Soft Gel Capsules and Once Daily Versus Twice Daily Administration, When Coadministered With Nucleoside Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors in Antiretroviral Naive Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Infected Subjects

A Phase 3, Randomized, Open-label, Study of Lopinavir/Ritonavir Tablets Versus Soft Gel Capsules and Once Daily Versus Twice Daily Administration, When Coadministered With NRTIs in Antiretroviral Naive HIV-1 Infected Subjects

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00262522
Enrollment
664
Registered
2005-12-07
Start date
2005-11-30
Completion date
2008-07-31
Last updated
2012-02-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Human Immunodeficiency Virus Infections

Keywords

Human Immunodeficiency Virus Infections

Brief summary

The purpose of this study was to compare the safety and tolerability of the to-be-marketed lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) tablet formulation with the marketed soft gel capsule (SGC) formulation and to compare the safety, tolerability, and antiviral activity of once daily (QD) and twice daily (BID) dosing of the LPV/r tablet formulation in combination with select nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) in patients who have not previously received antiretroviral treatment.

Interventions

DRUGlopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) (tablet or capsule) with nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs)

LPV/r 800/200 mg once daily (QD) tablet + emtricitabine (FTC) 200 mg QD + tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) 300 mg QD

Sponsors

Abbott
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Subjects were human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) positive, antiretroviral naïve adults at least 18 years of age with \< 7 days of prior antiretroviral therapy. * Subjects had plasma HIV-1 ribonucleic acid (RNA) levels \>= 1,000 copies/mL at screening and were not acutely ill. * Female subjects were nonpregnant and nonlactating.

Exclusion criteria

* Subjects were excluded if screening laboratory analyses showed any of the following abnormal laboratory results: * Presence of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) * Hemoglobin \<= 8.0 g/dL * Absolute neutrophil count \<= 750 cells/microliter * Platelet count \<= 50,000 per mL * Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) or aspartate aminotransferase (AST) \>= 3.0 x Upper Limit of Normal (ULN) * Calculated creatinine clearance \< 50 mL/min

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Percentage of Subjects With Adverse Events of Diarrhea During the First 8 WeeksWeek 8
Percentage of Subjects With Plasma Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 (HIV-1) Ribonucleic Acid (RNA) Levels < 50 Copies/mL at Week 48Week 48

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Percentage of Subjects With Plasma Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 (HIV-1) Ribonucleic Acid (RNA) Levels < 50 Copies/mL at Week 96Week 96 (End of Study)
Mean Change From Baseline to Week 96 in CD4+ T Cell CountsWeek 96 (End of Study)

Countries

Australia, Belgium, Canada, Czechia, France, Germany, Greece, Ireland, Italy, Netherlands, Poland, Puerto Rico, Russia, Singapore, Spain, Switzerland, Taiwan, United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Subjects were enrolled at 131 sites in 19 countries.

Pre-assignment details

Of the 672 subjects randomized, 8 discontinued from the study prior to receiving study drug due to withdrawal of consent (3), acute illness (2), lost to follow-up (1), other (1), and required prohibited medication (1).

Participants by arm

ArmCount
LPV/r 800/200 mg QD Tablet
lopinavir/ritonavir 800/200 mg once daily (QD) tablet
167
LPV/r 800/200 mg QD SGC (Through Week 8)
lopinavir/ritonavir 800/200 mg once daily (QD) soft gel capsule (SGC)
166
LPV/r 400/100 mg BID Tablet
lopinavir/ritonavir 400/100 mg twice daily (BID) tablet
166
LPV/r 400/100 mg BID SGC (Through Week 8)
lopinavir/ritonavir 400/100 mg twice daily (BID) soft gel capsule (SGC)
165
Total664

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003
Study Start Through 48 WeeksAdverse Event160100
Study Start Through 48 WeeksDeath2010
Study Start Through 48 WeeksLost to Follow-up80140
Study Start Through 48 WeeksNoncompliance3080
Study Start Through 48 WeeksRelocated, Needed to take twice daily8070
Study Start Through 48 WeeksVirologic failure2040
Study Start Through 48 WeeksWithdrawal by Subject100110
Study Start Through 8 WeeksAdverse Event1231
Study Start Through 8 WeeksDeath1000
Study Start Through 8 WeeksLost to Follow-up1232
Study Start Through 8 WeeksNoncompliance0022
Study Start Through 8 WeeksWithdrawal by Subject1130
Study Start Through 96 WeeksAdverse Event200160
Study Start Through 96 WeeksDeath2020
Study Start Through 96 WeeksLost to Follow-up190180
Study Start Through 96 WeeksNoncompliance60110
Study Start Through 96 WeeksRelocated, Needed to take twice daily10090
Study Start Through 96 WeeksVirologic failure5080
Study Start Through 96 WeeksWithdrawal by Subject150130

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicLPV/r 800/200 mg QD TabletLPV/r 800/200 mg QD SGC (Through Week 8)LPV/r 400/100 mg BID TabletLPV/r 400/100 mg BID SGC (Through Week 8)Total
Age Continuous38.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.8
38.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.63
38.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.69
39.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.31
38.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.85
CD4+ T Cell Count209.9 cells/mm3
STANDARD_DEVIATION 125.1
222.6 cells/mm3
STANDARD_DEVIATION 127.37
226.4 cells/mm3
STANDARD_DEVIATION 136.64
202.9 cells/mm3
STANDARD_DEVIATION 139.57
215.5 cells/mm3
STANDARD_DEVIATION 132.34
Plasma HIV-1 RNA Level4.92 log10 copies/mL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.64
4.94 log10 copies/mL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.67
5.04 log10 copies/mL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.68
5.06 log10 copies/mL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.64
4.99 log10 copies/mL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.66
Sex: Female, Male
Female
36 Participants31 Participants39 Participants38 Participants144 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
131 Participants135 Participants127 Participants127 Participants520 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
292 / 333287 / 331
serious
Total, serious adverse events
37 / 33350 / 331

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Subjects With Adverse Events of Diarrhea During the First 8 Weeks

Time frame: Week 8

Population: All randomized subjects who received at least 1 dose of study drug.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
LPV/r 800/200 mg QD TabletPercentage of Subjects With Adverse Events of Diarrhea During the First 8 Weeks49.1 Percentage of Subjects
LPV/r 800/200 mg QD SGC (Through Week 8)Percentage of Subjects With Adverse Events of Diarrhea During the First 8 Weeks54.8 Percentage of Subjects
LPV/r 400/100 mg BID TabletPercentage of Subjects With Adverse Events of Diarrhea During the First 8 Weeks44.6 Percentage of Subjects
LPV/r 400/100 mg BID SGC (Through Week 8)Percentage of Subjects With Adverse Events of Diarrhea During the First 8 Weeks49.7 Percentage of Subjects
Comparison: Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel (CMH) test stratified by dosing regimen was used to assess the null hypothesis of no difference between the tablet and soft gel capsule (SGC). Sample size was 600 subjects (150 each in the 4 groups). Based on a projected 48% reporting treatment-emergent diarrhea in the QD arm and 32% in the BID arm within the SGC group, with a 12% reduction in the corresponding tablet groups, this sample size provided 80% power to determine a difference between the tablet and SGC.p-value: >0.1Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Primary

Percentage of Subjects With Plasma Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 (HIV-1) Ribonucleic Acid (RNA) Levels < 50 Copies/mL at Week 48

Time frame: Week 48

Population: Intent-to-treat noncompleters considered failures (ITT, NC=F); all randomized subjects who received at least 1 dose of study drug.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
LPV/r 800/200 mg QD TabletPercentage of Subjects With Plasma Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 (HIV-1) Ribonucleic Acid (RNA) Levels < 50 Copies/mL at Week 4877.2 Percentage of Subjects
LPV/r 400/100 mg BID TabletPercentage of Subjects With Plasma Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 (HIV-1) Ribonucleic Acid (RNA) Levels < 50 Copies/mL at Week 4875.8 Percentage of Subjects
Comparison: The null hypothesis was that the response rate for the once daily (QD) regimen was more than 12% lower than the response rate for the twice daily (BID) regimen. The planned sample size of 600 subjects (300 subjects in each of the QD and BID treatment regimens) provided over 90% power to reject the null hypothesis, i.e., to determine noninferiority based on the 12% margin.p-value: 0.71595% CI: [-5.1, 7.8]normal approx. to the binomial distr.
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline to Week 96 in CD4+ T Cell Counts

Time frame: Week 96 (End of Study)

Population: All randomized subjects who received at least 1 dose of study drug and who had CD4+ T cell counts available at both the Baseline Visit and Week 96.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LPV/r 800/200 mg QD TabletMean Change From Baseline to Week 96 in CD4+ T Cell Counts238.4 cells/microliterStandard Error 10.02
LPV/r 400/100 mg BID TabletMean Change From Baseline to Week 96 in CD4+ T Cell Counts254.0 cells/microliterStandard Error 10
p-value: 0.269ANOVA
Secondary

Percentage of Subjects With Plasma Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 (HIV-1) Ribonucleic Acid (RNA) Levels < 50 Copies/mL at Week 96

Time frame: Week 96 (End of Study)

Population: Intent-to-treat noncompleters considered failures (ITT, NC=F); all randomized subjects who received at least 1 dose of study drug.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
LPV/r 800/200 mg QD TabletPercentage of Subjects With Plasma Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 (HIV-1) Ribonucleic Acid (RNA) Levels < 50 Copies/mL at Week 9664.9 Percentage of Subjects
LPV/r 400/100 mg BID TabletPercentage of Subjects With Plasma Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 (HIV-1) Ribonucleic Acid (RNA) Levels < 50 Copies/mL at Week 9669.2 Percentage of Subjects
Comparison: The null hypothesis was that the response rate for the once daily (QD) regimen was more than 12% lower than the response rate for the twice daily (BID) regimen. The planned sample size of 600 subjects (300 subjects in each of the QD and BID treatment regimens) provided over 90% power to reject the null hypothesis, i.e., to determine noninferiority based on the 12% margin.p-value: 0.24995% CI: [-11.5, 2.8]normal approx. to the binomial distr.

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026