Skip to content

Emergency Egress and Information System for Persons With Vision Loss

Emergency Egress and Information System for Persons With Vision Loss

Status
Terminated
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00262509
Enrollment
17
Registered
2005-12-06
Start date
2008-09-30
Completion date
2009-04-30
Last updated
2014-02-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Blindness

Keywords

Rehabilitation, Sensory Aid

Brief summary

The purpose of the research project is to develop and evaluate an emergency egress system for persons with visual impairment, which would use existing lighted exit signage to provide egress information at a distance of up to 100 feet.

Detailed description

The purpose of the proposed three-year research project is to develop and evaluate an emergency egress system for persons with visual impairment. This system would use existing lighted exit signage to provide egress information at a distance of up to 100 feet. The distance is the same as the required visibility distance of lighted exit signs for sighted persons. By offering egress information at an equivalent distance, the investigators hypothesize that people with visual impairment can approach the egress performance of sighted persons. The information transmitted will be equivalent to what a sighted person obtains, namely, the direction of the exit door. In addition, a description of the exit route will be provided including the distance to the exit door; lighting conditions, hazards and obstacles that will be encountered on the exit route; the distance down to the street; and where on the street they will be when they get out of the building. A receiver worn by the person will include a tiny optical array to sense the direction of each exit sign. The receiver will also translate the transmitted signal into a spoken message. A low-profile stereo bone conduction headset will indicate the direction to each exit sign along a path to the exit door. For people with some hearing loss, this same low-profile headset will be used to simulate a light tap to one side or other of the head to indicate direction. Such directional tapping output may also prove effective when loud alarms are blaring. The objectives are to: 1. develop Talking Exit Lights with a range of at least 100 feet, 2. write software for the user device to accurately indicate the direction of Talking Exit Lights and provide spoken messages, 3. optimize the user interface to make it easy and intuitive to use, 4. test the accuracy and reliability of the developed system in terms of transmission range and directional accuracy, and 5. conduct subject evaluations of the new system. Two versions of transmitting exit signs will be developed: 1. a retro-fit design for existing fluorescent light exit signs, and 2. a Light Emitting Diode (LED) design for the LED exit signs now going into newly constructed buildings. For the retro-fit version, Talking Lights, LLC, will modify the physical shape and size of their Talking Light digital ballast, making it a fully compatible replacement for existing exit sign ballasts. VA investigators will develop the LED version, designing and constructing a microprocessor-controlled system for storing and transmitting information using LEDs. Both designs will use secure power line communications to upload transmittal information to specific exit signs, each of which will have its own ID number. Finally, VA investigators will write software for the existing Talking Lights PocketPC receiver to interpret sensor signals, obtain sign location data, and convert this data into a stereo sound presentation of exit sign direction. This development will be accomplished via a Cooperative Research and Development Agreement (CRADA) with Talking Lights LLC, which holds a patent on an electronic ballast that converts standard fluorescent bulbs into digital information transmitters. The company will also provide a PocketPC receiver that decodes their proprietary transmission signal, and a 5-sensor optical array capable of picking up their signal over a 150-degree field. As part of this CRADA, Talking Lights will modify their ballast to match the form-factor of ballasts in exit signs. Further, they will release their proprietary encoder design to VA investigators so that the LED Exit Light design can be made fully compatible with the fluorescent light design. Once developed and optimized, investigators hypothesize a dramatic improvement in egress performance for all ages of two populations: 1. people with severe vision loss who use a white cane or dog for mobility, and 2. people with low vision who do not use a white cane or dog for mobility, yet have problems reading and locating exit signs. Results will be published and presented for review to the National Fire Prevention Agency (NFPA) for consideration as part of the Life Safety Code, and to the Building Officials and Code Administrators (BOCA) for consideration as part of the National Building Code. COMPARISONS: Egress using existing emergency exit signage.

Interventions

DEVICEEgress Badge

Egress Badge is worn by subjects who are asked to use the badge to exit the building. The badge indicates the direction of each exit sign on route to an exit.

Sponsors

US Department of Veterans Affairs
Lead SponsorFED

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Must Be Blind with no better vision than light perception * Must be able to walk the necessary distances, i.e., three hours of intermittent indoor walking * OMCT (Orientation-Memory Concentration Test) of 10 or less

Exclusion criteria

* Patients currently being treated at Atlanta VA Medical Center

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Time to Exit Building30 minutes total, 15 minutes for each of two timed trialsSubjects are walked into a building to a specific location and then asked to find their way out of the building. Time to Exit Building is measured. This is protocol is performed twice, and the times averaged to obtain the outcome measure.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Subjects were recruited from July through September, 2009. They were recruited from the VA Medical Center Eye Clinic and the Atlanta Center for Visual Impairment.

Pre-assignment details

17 participants recruited after 23 potential participants contacted by phone from our VA subject registry. Of the 23 contacted, 3 screened out as not meeting inclusion criteria, and 3 chose not to participate.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
First Baseline, Then Intervention
Baseline First: For two separate timed trials Blind Participants are walked into a building to different randomized locations, and then asked to find their way out of the building. Each Trial takes at most 15 minutes. Intervention Next: Blind Participants are trained for 15 minutes in the use of the egress badge, then in two separate timed trials are walked into a building to different randomized locations, and are asked to find their way out of the building. Each Trial takes at most 15 minutes.
8
First Intervention, Then Baseline
Intervention First: Blind Participants are trained for 15 minutes in the use of the egress badge, then in two separate timed trials are walked into a building to different randomized locations, and are asked to find their way out of the building. Each Trial takes at most 15 minutes. Baseline Next: For two separate timed trials Blind Participants are walked into a building to different randomized locations, and then asked to find their way out of the building. Each Trial takes at most 15 minutes.
9
Total17

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicFirst Intervention, Then BaselineFirst Baseline, Then InterventionTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
8 Participants8 Participants16 Participants
Age, Continuous52.75 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.07
47.78 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.72
50.12 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.27
Region of Enrollment
United States
9 participants8 participants17 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
4 Participants4 Participants8 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
5 Participants4 Participants9 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 170 / 17
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 170 / 17

Outcome results

Primary

Time to Exit Building

Subjects are walked into a building to a specific location and then asked to find their way out of the building. Time to Exit Building is measured. This is protocol is performed twice, and the times averaged to obtain the outcome measure.

Time frame: 30 minutes total, 15 minutes for each of two timed trials

Population: Total number of participants completing study

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
InterventionTime to Exit Building198 secondsStandard Deviation 47
BaselineTime to Exit Building165 secondsStandard Deviation 63

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026