Skip to content

MINERVA: MINimizE Right Ventricular Pacing to Prevent Atrial Fibrillation and Heart Failure

MINERVA: MINimizE Right Ventricular Pacing to Prevent Atrial Fibrillation and Heart Failure

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00262119
Enrollment
1300
Registered
2005-12-06
Start date
2006-02-28
Completion date
2013-04-30
Last updated
2025-07-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Atrial Fibrillation, Heart Failure, Congestive

Keywords

Physiological pacing, Antitachycardia pacing therapies

Brief summary

The aim of this study is to test the impact of the managed ventricular pacing (MVP) mode and atrial preventive and antitachycardia pacing therapies on the reduction of a composite clinical outcome composed of any death, permanent atrial fibrillation, and cardiovascular hospitalizations.

Detailed description

Kristensen et al. reported that AAIR pacing reduces atrial fibrillation (AF) development compared to DDDR pacing in sinus node disfunction patients. Several authors have shown that, in patients with intact AV conduction, unnecessary chronic RV pacing can cause detrimental effects such as AF, left ventricular (LV) dysfunction and congestive heart failure. These findings arose the hypothesis that the non-physiologic nature of ventricular pacing may result in electrophysiological and LV remodeling changes that have potentially deleterious long-term effects. The MVP mode, present in the Medtronic pacemaker EnRhythm, provides atrial based pacing with ventricular backup. It operates in true AAI(R) mode, it provides ventricular backup in case of a single conduction loss and converts to DDD(R) mode in case of persistent loss of AV conduction. Aim of this study is to test the impact of the MVP pacing mode and atrial preventive and antitachycardia pacing therapies on the reduction of a composite clinical outcome composed by any death, permanent AF, cardiovascular hospitalizations.

Interventions

DEVICEPacemaker Medtronic EnRhythm

Pacemaker specific programming

Sponsors

Medtronic Cardiac Rhythm and Heart Failure
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Class I/Class II indications for dual chamber pacing * Previous implant of an EnRhythm dual chamber implantable pulse generator (IPG) since maximum 2 weeks * History of atrial arrhythmias (at least one electrocardiogram \[ECG\] or Holter documented episodes in the last 12 months)

Exclusion criteria

* Less than 18 years of age * Pregnancy * Unwilling or unable to give informed consent or to commit to follow-up schedule * Medical conditions that preclude protocol required testing or limit study participation * Enrolled or intend to participate in another clinical trial during the course of this study * A life expectancy of less than 2 years * Patient is a candidate for an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) or cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) device implant * Anticipated major cardiac surgery within the course of this study * Permanent III degree AV-block or history of AV node ablation * History of permanent AF (as defined below) * AF ablation (left pulmonary veins) or other cardiac surgery \< 3 months * Prior implant of defibrillator device or pacemaker (apart from EnRhythm IPG implanted within two weeks) * Uncontrolled hyperthyroidism

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Composite Endpoint Composed by Death for Any Cause, Cardiovascular Hospitalization or Permanent AF at 2 Years2 yearsThe outcome measurement is the 2 years incidence, calculated by Kaplan Meier survival analysis, of the composite endpoint composed by death for any cause, cardiovascular hospitalization or permanent AF.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Development of Atrioventricular (AV) Block and Pacemaker Dependency2 years
Predictors of Stroke, Transient Ischemic Attack (TIA) and Arterial Embolism2 years
Echocardiogram Data About Left Ventricular Fractional Shortening and Ejection Fraction and Left Atrium Dilatation2 years
Subjects' Symptoms2 years
Heart Failure Medications2 years
Cumulative Percentage of Ventricular Pacing2 years
Cardiovascular Death2 years
Any Hospitalization2 years
Adverse Events2 years
Death for All Causes at 2 Years2 yearsIncidence, estimated via Kaplan Meier survival analysis, of death for any cause at 2 years
Incidence of Permanent Atrial Fibrillation at 2 Years2 yearsIncidence, estimated via Kaplan Meier survival analysis, of permanent atrial fibrillation at 2 years
Incidence of Cardiovascular Hospitalizations at 2 Years2 yearsIncidence, estimated via Kaplan Meier survival analysis, of cardiovascular hospitalizations at 2 years
Burden of Composite Clinical Endpoint2 years
Persistent Atrial Fibrillation (AF)2 years
Clinical Outcome in All the Patients With MVP ON Between Patients With Optimized AV-delay and Patients Without Optimized AV-delay2 years
Time to Development of the Composite Endpoint Between All Randomized Subjects in the Three Arms in Subgroups of Patients2 years
Frequency, Type, and Associated Cost of Health Care Utilization and Utility2 years
Atrial Fibrillation Burden2 years

Countries

Italy

Participant flow

Recruitment details

The recruitment period was between February 2006 and April 2010. Patients were enrolled in cardiology departments.

Pre-assignment details

A total of 1300 patients were enrolled in the study. Enrollment was followed by a 1-month run-in period. Patients with ventricular pacing ≥ 95% on device check in the run-in period were excluded from the study. At the end of the run-in period, randomization was performed. In all, 1166 patients were randomized and followed up.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Control Group
PM programming according to actual clinical practice Pacemaker Medtronic EnRhythm: Pacemaker specific programming
385
MVP Only
PM programming according to actual clinical practice + MVP algorithm ON Pacemaker Medtronic EnRhythm: Pacemaker specific programming
398
DDDRP
PM programming according to actual clinical practice + MVP algorithm ON + Atrial fibrillation therapies ON Pacemaker Medtronic EnRhythm: Pacemaker specific programming
383
Total1,166

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Overall StudyDeath201916
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up385142

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicMVP OnlyTotalControl GroupDDDRP
Age, Continuous74 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9
74 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9
73 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9
74 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9
Region of Enrollment
Austria
14 participants44 participants15 participants15 participants
Region of Enrollment
France
1 participants2 participants0 participants1 participants
Region of Enrollment
Germany
5 participants16 participants8 participants3 participants
Region of Enrollment
Greece
25 participants73 participants23 participants25 participants
Region of Enrollment
Hong Kong
1 participants3 participants1 participants1 participants
Region of Enrollment
Israel
7 participants22 participants7 participants8 participants
Region of Enrollment
Italy
211 participants616 participants203 participants202 participants
Region of Enrollment
Kuwait
4 participants9 participants2 participants3 participants
Region of Enrollment
Netherlands
43 participants123 participants41 participants39 participants
Region of Enrollment
Portugal
44 participants131 participants43 participants44 participants
Region of Enrollment
Russian Federation
11 participants30 participants10 participants9 participants
Region of Enrollment
Slovakia
5 participants16 participants5 participants6 participants
Region of Enrollment
Spain
18 participants51 participants16 participants17 participants
Region of Enrollment
Switzerland
7 participants23 participants9 participants7 participants
Region of Enrollment
Taiwan
2 participants7 participants2 participants3 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
188 Participants578 Participants180 Participants210 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
210 Participants588 Participants205 Participants173 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 3850 / 3980 / 383
serious
Total, serious adverse events
180 / 385165 / 398169 / 383

Outcome results

Primary

Composite Endpoint Composed by Death for Any Cause, Cardiovascular Hospitalization or Permanent AF at 2 Years

The outcome measurement is the 2 years incidence, calculated by Kaplan Meier survival analysis, of the composite endpoint composed by death for any cause, cardiovascular hospitalization or permanent AF.

Time frame: 2 years

Population: Analysis was intention to treat therefore all randomized patients were considered in the analyses

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Control GroupComposite Endpoint Composed by Death for Any Cause, Cardiovascular Hospitalization or Permanent AF at 2 Years28.0 percentage of participants
MVP OnlyComposite Endpoint Composed by Death for Any Cause, Cardiovascular Hospitalization or Permanent AF at 2 Years23.1 percentage of participants
DDDRPComposite Endpoint Composed by Death for Any Cause, Cardiovascular Hospitalization or Permanent AF at 2 Years21.5 percentage of participants
Secondary

Adverse Events

Time frame: 2 years

Secondary

Any Hospitalization

Time frame: 2 years

Secondary

Atrial Fibrillation Burden

Time frame: 2 years

Secondary

Burden of Composite Clinical Endpoint

Time frame: 2 years

Secondary

Cardiovascular Death

Time frame: 2 years

Secondary

Clinical Outcome in All the Patients With MVP ON Between Patients With Optimized AV-delay and Patients Without Optimized AV-delay

Time frame: 2 years

Secondary

Cumulative Percentage of Ventricular Pacing

Time frame: 2 years

Secondary

Death for All Causes at 2 Years

Incidence, estimated via Kaplan Meier survival analysis, of death for any cause at 2 years

Time frame: 2 years

Population: The analysis was intention to treat therefore all randomized patients were included in the analysis

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Control GroupDeath for All Causes at 2 Years5.6 percentage of participants
MVP OnlyDeath for All Causes at 2 Years5.1 percentage of participants
DDDRPDeath for All Causes at 2 Years4.6 percentage of participants
Secondary

Development of Atrioventricular (AV) Block and Pacemaker Dependency

Time frame: 2 years

Secondary

Echocardiogram Data About Left Ventricular Fractional Shortening and Ejection Fraction and Left Atrium Dilatation

Time frame: 2 years

Secondary

Frequency, Type, and Associated Cost of Health Care Utilization and Utility

Time frame: 2 years

Secondary

Heart Failure Medications

Time frame: 2 years

Secondary

Incidence of Cardiovascular Hospitalizations at 2 Years

Incidence, estimated via Kaplan Meier survival analysis, of cardiovascular hospitalizations at 2 years

Time frame: 2 years

Population: Analysis was intention to treat therefore all randomized patients were analysed

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Control GroupIncidence of Cardiovascular Hospitalizations at 2 Years16.8 percentage of participants
MVP OnlyIncidence of Cardiovascular Hospitalizations at 2 Years13.7 percentage of participants
DDDRPIncidence of Cardiovascular Hospitalizations at 2 Years15.2 percentage of participants
Secondary

Incidence of Permanent Atrial Fibrillation at 2 Years

Incidence, estimated via Kaplan Meier survival analysis, of permanent atrial fibrillation at 2 years

Time frame: 2 years

Population: The analysis was intention to treat therefore all randomized patients were analysed

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Control GroupIncidence of Permanent Atrial Fibrillation at 2 Years9.2 percentage of participants
MVP OnlyIncidence of Permanent Atrial Fibrillation at 2 Years7.7 percentage of participants
DDDRPIncidence of Permanent Atrial Fibrillation at 2 Years3.8 percentage of participants
Secondary

Persistent Atrial Fibrillation (AF)

Time frame: 2 years

Secondary

Predictors of Stroke, Transient Ischemic Attack (TIA) and Arterial Embolism

Time frame: 2 years

Secondary

Subjects' Symptoms

Time frame: 2 years

Secondary

Time to Development of the Composite Endpoint Between All Randomized Subjects in the Three Arms in Subgroups of Patients

Time frame: 2 years

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 8, 2026