Skip to content

Bone Biopsy Study For Dialysis Patients With Secondary Hyperparathyroidism of End Stage Renal Disease

Bone Histomorphometry Assessment For Dialysis Patients With Secondary Hyperparathyroidism of End Stage Renal Disease

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00261950
Acronym
BONAFIDE
Enrollment
110
Registered
2005-12-06
Start date
2006-05-31
Completion date
2011-05-31
Last updated
2014-07-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Secondary Hyperparathyroidism

Keywords

Cinacalcet HCl, Cinacalcet, Amgen (AMG) 073, Sensipar, Mimpara, Calcimimetic

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effects of cinacalcet on markers of bone turnover in patients with kidney disease who are receiving dialysis.

Detailed description

Secondary hyperparathyroidism (HPT) is common in people with end stage renal disease (kidney disease). Patients with secondary HPT often have enlarged parathyroid glands in the neck and as a result often have elevated parathyroid hormone (PTH) levels . Patients with secondary HPT may have bone disease (osteodystrophy). Cinacalcet has been used to decrease PTH levels in patients with secondary HPT. Patients with secondary HPT may have bone disease (osteodystrophy). This bone disease may cause bone pain, fractures, and poor formation of red blood cells. The purpose of this study is to evaluate effects of cinacalcet on markers of bone turnover in patients with kidney disease who are receiving dialysis.

Interventions

DRUGSensipar (Cinacalcet HCl)

All enrolled subjects receive study medication at a starting dose of 30 mg cinacalcet once daily beginning on day 1. Possible sequential doses are 30 mg, 60mg, 90mg, 120mg, 180 mg taken once daily. During the study, dose adjustment (dose increase/decrease/withholding) is based upon iPTH, serum calcium, and subject safety information. Subjects swallowed tablets whole without biting or chewing. Subjects were dispensed investigational product every 4 weeks starting from Day 1 through to Week 48.

Sponsors

Amgen
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Subjects will be eligible for the study if they meet all of the following criteria: * One Intact Parathyroid Hormone (iPTH) determination obtained from the central laboratory must be \>/= 300 pg/mL. * One serum calcium determination obtained from the central laboratory must be \>/= 8.4 mg/dL (2.1 mmol/L). * One Bone Alkaline Phosphatase (BALP) determination obtained from the central laboratory must be \>/= 20.9 ng/mL. * Positive histologic confirmation of high bone turnover disease as assessed by the central bone histology center. * Treated with dialysis \>/= 1 month before the date of informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

Subjects will be ineligible for the study if they: * Have an unstable medical condition in the judgment of the investigator. * Are pregnant or nursing women. * Had a parathyroidectomy in the 3 months before the date of informed consent. * For subjects prescribed vitamin D, have received vitamin D therapy for less than 30 days before day 1 or required a change in vitamin D brand or dose level within 30 days before day 1. * Ever received therapy with Sensipar®/Mimpara®

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Change From Baseline to End of Study in Bone Formation Rate (BFR)Baseline to week 52

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percent Change From Baseline in Serum Calcium During the Efficacy Assessment Phase (EAP)Baseline to weeks 40-52
Percent Change From Baseline in Serum Phosphorus During the Efficacy Assessment Phase (EAP)Baseline to weeks 40-52
Percent Change From Baseline in Ca x P During the Efficacy Assessment Phase (EAP)Baseline to weeks 40-52
Percent Change From Baseline in Bone Specific Alkaline Phosphatase (BALP) at Week 52Baseline to week 52
Percent Change From Baseline in N - Telopeptide (NTx) at Week 52Baseline to week 52
Percent Change From Baseline in Tartrate Resistant Acid Phosphatase(TRAP) at Week 52Baseline to week 52
Change From Baseline to End of Study in Osteoblast Perimeter (Osteoblast Perimeter/Osteoid Perimeter)Baseline to week 52Osteoblast Perimeter was calculated as Osteoblast Perimeter/Osteoid Perimeter \* 100
Change From Baseline to End of Study in Osteoclast Perimeter (Osteoclast Perimeter/Eroded Perimeter)Baseline to week 52Osteoclast Perimeter was calculated as Osteoclast Perimeter/Eroded Perimeter \* 100
Change in Categorization From Baseline to End of Study in Fibrosis Area/Tissue AreaBaseline to week 52Categorisation at each timepoint was based on fibrosis area as a percentage of tissue area (Fibrosis Area/Tissue Area \* 100)
Change From Baseline to End of Study in Eroded Perimeter/Bone PerimeterBaseline to week 52Eroded Perimeter/Bone Perimeter was calculated as Eroded Perimeter/Bone Perimeter \* 100
Percent Change From Baseline in Osteocalcin (OC) at Week 52Baseline to week 52
Percent Change From Baseline in Parathyroid Hormone (PTH) During the Efficacy Assessment Phase (EAP)Baseline to weeks 40-52

Countries

Belgium, Czechia, Hungary, Italy, North Macedonia, Poland, Portugal, Spain, Switzerland, Turkey (Türkiye), United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

May 22 2006 is study initiation date and 13 May 2011 is study completion date.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Cinacalcet
cinacalcet hydrochloride. Participants received a starting dose of 30 mg cinacalcet daily (QD). Dose adjustments were based upon repeated measurements of intact parathyroid hormone, calcium serum concentrations, and participant safety information.
110
Total110

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyDeath6
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up2
Overall StudyOther1
Overall StudyPhysician Decision1
Overall StudyProtocol specified Criteria11
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject5

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicCinacalcet
Age, Continuous55.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.2
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black
10 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
9 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
91 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
40 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
70 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
84 / 110
serious
Total, serious adverse events
45 / 110

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline to End of Study in Bone Formation Rate (BFR)

Time frame: Baseline to week 52

Population: Enrolled subjects with bone biopsy at week 52

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
CinacalcetChange From Baseline to End of Study in Bone Formation Rate (BFR)-488 μm^2/mm^2/dayStandard Error 73
Secondary

Change From Baseline to End of Study in Eroded Perimeter/Bone Perimeter

Eroded Perimeter/Bone Perimeter was calculated as Eroded Perimeter/Bone Perimeter \* 100

Time frame: Baseline to week 52

Population: Enrolled subjects with eroded perimeter/bone perimeter at week 52

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
CinacalcetChange From Baseline to End of Study in Eroded Perimeter/Bone Perimeter-3.4 percentage of bone perimeterStandard Error 0.6
Secondary

Change From Baseline to End of Study in Osteoblast Perimeter (Osteoblast Perimeter/Osteoid Perimeter)

Osteoblast Perimeter was calculated as Osteoblast Perimeter/Osteoid Perimeter \* 100

Time frame: Baseline to week 52

Population: Enrolled subjects with Osteoblast Perimeter at week 52

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
CinacalcetChange From Baseline to End of Study in Osteoblast Perimeter (Osteoblast Perimeter/Osteoid Perimeter)-4.3 percentage of osteoid perimeterStandard Error 1.4
Secondary

Change From Baseline to End of Study in Osteoclast Perimeter (Osteoclast Perimeter/Eroded Perimeter)

Osteoclast Perimeter was calculated as Osteoclast Perimeter/Eroded Perimeter \* 100

Time frame: Baseline to week 52

Population: Enrolled subjects with Osteoclast Perimeter at week 52

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
CinacalcetChange From Baseline to End of Study in Osteoclast Perimeter (Osteoclast Perimeter/Eroded Perimeter)-2.7 percentage of eroded perimeterStandard Error 1.5
Secondary

Change in Categorization From Baseline to End of Study in Fibrosis Area/Tissue Area

Categorisation at each timepoint was based on fibrosis area as a percentage of tissue area (Fibrosis Area/Tissue Area \* 100)

Time frame: Baseline to week 52

Population: Enrolled subjects with Fibrosis Area/Tissue Area at week 52

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
CinacalcetChange in Categorization From Baseline to End of Study in Fibrosis Area/Tissue AreaBaseline ≥ 26% End of Study 6-10%1 participants
CinacalcetChange in Categorization From Baseline to End of Study in Fibrosis Area/Tissue AreaBaseline 0% End of Study 0%3 participants
CinacalcetChange in Categorization From Baseline to End of Study in Fibrosis Area/Tissue AreaBaseline 0% End of Study 1-5%3 participants
CinacalcetChange in Categorization From Baseline to End of Study in Fibrosis Area/Tissue AreaBaseline 0% End of Study 6-10%0 participants
CinacalcetChange in Categorization From Baseline to End of Study in Fibrosis Area/Tissue AreaBaseline 0% End of Study 11-25%0 participants
CinacalcetChange in Categorization From Baseline to End of Study in Fibrosis Area/Tissue AreaBaseline 0% End of Study ≥ 26%0 participants
CinacalcetChange in Categorization From Baseline to End of Study in Fibrosis Area/Tissue AreaBaseline 1-5% End of Study 0%17 participants
CinacalcetChange in Categorization From Baseline to End of Study in Fibrosis Area/Tissue AreaBaseline 1-5% End of Study 1-5%31 participants
CinacalcetChange in Categorization From Baseline to End of Study in Fibrosis Area/Tissue AreaBaseline 1-5% End of Study 6-10%2 participants
CinacalcetChange in Categorization From Baseline to End of Study in Fibrosis Area/Tissue AreaBaseline 1-5% End of Study 11-25%0 participants
CinacalcetChange in Categorization From Baseline to End of Study in Fibrosis Area/Tissue AreaBaseline 1-5% End of Study ≥ 26%0 participants
CinacalcetChange in Categorization From Baseline to End of Study in Fibrosis Area/Tissue AreaBaseline 6-10% End of Study 0%4 participants
CinacalcetChange in Categorization From Baseline to End of Study in Fibrosis Area/Tissue AreaBaseline 6-10% End of Study 1-5%7 participants
CinacalcetChange in Categorization From Baseline to End of Study in Fibrosis Area/Tissue AreaBaseline 6-10%% End of Study 6-10%5 participants
CinacalcetChange in Categorization From Baseline to End of Study in Fibrosis Area/Tissue AreaBaseline 6-10% End of Study 11-25%2 participants
CinacalcetChange in Categorization From Baseline to End of Study in Fibrosis Area/Tissue AreaBaseline 6-10% End of Study ≥ 26%0 participants
CinacalcetChange in Categorization From Baseline to End of Study in Fibrosis Area/Tissue AreaBaseline 11-25% End of Study 0%0 participants
CinacalcetChange in Categorization From Baseline to End of Study in Fibrosis Area/Tissue AreaBaseline 11-25% End of Study 1-5%0 participants
CinacalcetChange in Categorization From Baseline to End of Study in Fibrosis Area/Tissue AreaBaseline 11-25% End of Study 6-10%1 participants
CinacalcetChange in Categorization From Baseline to End of Study in Fibrosis Area/Tissue AreaBaseline 11-25% End of Study 11-25%0 participants
CinacalcetChange in Categorization From Baseline to End of Study in Fibrosis Area/Tissue AreaBaseline 11-25% End of Study ≥ 26%0 participants
CinacalcetChange in Categorization From Baseline to End of Study in Fibrosis Area/Tissue AreaBaseline ≥ 26% End of Study 0%0 participants
CinacalcetChange in Categorization From Baseline to End of Study in Fibrosis Area/Tissue AreaBaseline ≥ 26% End of Study 1-5%1 participants
CinacalcetChange in Categorization From Baseline to End of Study in Fibrosis Area/Tissue AreaBaseline ≥ 26% End of Study 11-25%0 participants
CinacalcetChange in Categorization From Baseline to End of Study in Fibrosis Area/Tissue AreaBaseline ≥ 26% End of Study ≥ 26%0 participants
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline in Bone Specific Alkaline Phosphatase (BALP) at Week 52

Time frame: Baseline to week 52

Population: Enrolled subjects with BALP at week 52

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
CinacalcetPercent Change From Baseline in Bone Specific Alkaline Phosphatase (BALP) at Week 526.6 percent changeStandard Error 12.7
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline in Ca x P During the Efficacy Assessment Phase (EAP)

Time frame: Baseline to weeks 40-52

Population: Enrolled subjects with Ca x P during the Efficacy Assessment Phase (EAP)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
CinacalcetPercent Change From Baseline in Ca x P During the Efficacy Assessment Phase (EAP)-6.9 percent changeStandard Error 3.1
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline in N - Telopeptide (NTx) at Week 52

Time frame: Baseline to week 52

Population: Enrolled subjects with NTx at week 52

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
CinacalcetPercent Change From Baseline in N - Telopeptide (NTx) at Week 52-14.0 percent changeStandard Error 14.7
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline in Osteocalcin (OC) at Week 52

Time frame: Baseline to week 52

Population: Enrolled subjects with osteocalcin (OC) at week 52

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
CinacalcetPercent Change From Baseline in Osteocalcin (OC) at Week 52-21.8 Percent changeStandard Error 6.2
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline in Parathyroid Hormone (PTH) During the Efficacy Assessment Phase (EAP)

Time frame: Baseline to weeks 40-52

Population: Enrolled subjects with PTH during the Efficacy Assessment Phase (EAP)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
CinacalcetPercent Change From Baseline in Parathyroid Hormone (PTH) During the Efficacy Assessment Phase (EAP)-41.6 percent changeStandard Error 4.4
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline in Serum Calcium During the Efficacy Assessment Phase (EAP)

Time frame: Baseline to weeks 40-52

Population: Enrolled subjects with serum calcium during the Efficacy Assessment Phase (EAP)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
CinacalcetPercent Change From Baseline in Serum Calcium During the Efficacy Assessment Phase (EAP)-6.5 percent changeStandard Error 1.1
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline in Serum Phosphorus During the Efficacy Assessment Phase (EAP)

Time frame: Baseline to weeks 40-52

Population: Enrolled subjects with serum phosphorus during the Efficacy Assessment Phase (EAP)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
CinacalcetPercent Change From Baseline in Serum Phosphorus During the Efficacy Assessment Phase (EAP)-1.1 percent changeStandard Error 2.9
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline in Tartrate Resistant Acid Phosphatase(TRAP) at Week 52

Time frame: Baseline to week 52

Population: Enrolled subjects with TRAP at week 52

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
CinacalcetPercent Change From Baseline in Tartrate Resistant Acid Phosphatase(TRAP) at Week 52-3.8 percent changeStandard Error 9.2

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026