Skip to content

Evaluation of Women's Experience With EVRA (Norelgestromin + Ethinyl Estradiol) Transdermal Contraceptive Patch Compared With Previous Methods of Contraception.

An Open Label, Multicentre Study of the EVRA (Norelgestromin + Ethinyl Estradiol) Transdermal Contraceptive Patch in Europe: Evaluation of Women's Experience With EVRA� and Comparison With Previously Used Methods of Contraception.

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00261482
Enrollment
778
Registered
2005-12-05
Start date
2003-07-31
Completion date
2004-12-31
Last updated
2010-11-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Contraception, Female Contraception

Keywords

contraception, female contraception, hormonal contraception, transdermal contraception, EVRA, estrogen, progestin, ethinyl estradiol, norelgestromin

Brief summary

The purpose of the study is to evaluate user experience with the EVRA® Contraceptive Transdermal Patch; specifically, user satisfaction with the EVRA® Patch, and if applicable, user preference of the EVRA® Patch compared with the previous method of contraception. The study also evaluates contraceptive efficacy, safety and user compliance.

Detailed description

EVRA is the first transdermal contraceptive patch to receive approval by Health Canada and Marketing Authorization throughout the European Union. This is an open-label, single-arm, multicenter clinical study with a treatment duration of 24 weeks (6 treatment cycles of 4 weeks). Four clinic visits are scheduled: a screening Visit 1, in which subjects are asked to complete a set of questions about satisfaction with the current method of contraception, and questions about overall health status. Visits 2, 3, and 4 follow after Cycles 1, 3, and 6, respectively of EVRA treatment. At Visits 3 and 4, the subjects are asked to answer questions about satisfaction with EVRA, and about overall health status. At Visit 4 (final study visit) the subjects are asked to compare EVRA with previously used contraceptive methods. Compliance is assessed at all visits by returned boxes of study medication and a review of Diary Cards where subjects recorded the dates and sites of patch application, and details of any patch detachment. The study will generate the first large-scale, European dataset on women's experience with EVRA, including satisfaction, safety, efficacy, and compliance. These data will be compared with subjects' experience with previously used methods of contraception. Each EVRA patch, containing 6 mg NGMN and 600 ug EE, and delivering 150 microgram NGMN and 20 ug EE over 24 hours for 7 days, is worn for 1 week and replaced for 3 consecutive weeks. The fourth week is patch-free. Subjects can wear EVRA on 1 of 4 areas: buttock, abdomen, upper torso, or upper arm.

Interventions

Sponsors

Janssen Pharmaceutica N.V., Belgium
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 45 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Regular menstrual cycles * sexually active and at risk of pregnancy * nonpregnant * normal Pap smear

Exclusion criteria

* Presently have or at risk of venous thrombosis or arterial thrombosis * migraines with focal aura * severe hypertension * diabetes mellitus * hereditary dyslipoproteinemia * carcinoma of breast, endometrium or other estrogen-dependent neoplasia * substance abuse * skin conditions * concurrent use of hormone-containing medication * smoking women over 35 years of age.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Level of satisfaction with EVRA after 3 and 6 cycles of use. Comparisons are made between EVRA satisfaction level and that with the previous primary contraceptive method.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Efficacy is determined using the Pearl Index and the life table analysis (gross cumulative probability of pregnancy). Safety is evaluated throughout the study.

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026