Skip to content

Prospective Randomised Study of Doxorubicin in the Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma by Drug-Eluting Bead Embolisation

Prospective Randomised Study of Doxorubicin in the Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma by Drug-Eluting Bead Embolisation (PRECISION V)

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00261378
Acronym
PRECISIONV
Enrollment
212
Registered
2005-12-05
Start date
2005-11-30
Completion date
2008-01-31
Last updated
2021-07-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Primary Liver Cancer

Keywords

Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC)

Brief summary

The objective of this study is to assess the safety and efficacy of DC Bead™ delivered by intra-arterial embolisation for the treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Interventions

DEVICETransarterialchemoembolisation (TACE)
DEVICEDC Bead with Doxorubicin

Sponsors

Biocompatibles UK Ltd
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Boston Scientific Corporation
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients with a confirmed diagnosis of HCC according to the EASL criteria for diagnosis, see appendix 4 and staged according to the BCLC criteria. * Patient chooses to participate and has signed the informed consent document * Age above 18 years old * Patients with HCC not suitable for resection or percutaneous ablation according to the BCLC Staging classification, see Figure 2. * Patient is eligible for resection or percutaneous ablation but the treatment is unfeasible or the patient has declined. This decision must be documented in the patient's records. * Patient is eligible for chemoembolisation prior to transplantation and the expected transplant waiting time exceeds 6 months. * Patients who demonstrates recurrence following potentially curative treatment (resection and percutaneous ablation) who have clearly measurable disease according to RECIST or EASL * Patients with Performance Status ECOG 0 and 1 * Patients with well preserved liver function (Child-Pugh A and B) * Patients with bilobar disease who can be treated superselectively in a single session or both lobes able to be treated within 3 weeks.

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with another primary tumour, with the exception of conventional basal cell carcinoma or superficial bladder neoplasia * Patients previously treated with transarterial embolisation (with or without chemotherapy). * Patients previously treated with anthracyclines (ie doxorubicin). * Patients' whose only measurable disease is within an area of the liver previously subjected to radiotherapy. * Advanced liver disease: * Child-Pugh C, * active gastrointestinal bleeding, * encephalopathy or clinically relevant ascites. * Bilirubin levels \>3mg/dl * Advanced tumoural disease: * BCLC class C, (vascular invasion including segmental portal obstruction, extrahepatic spread or cancer-related symptoms= ECOG 2, 3 and 4) or * BCLC class D (WHO performance status 3 or 4, Okuda III stage) or * Diffuse HCC defined as \>50% tumour involvement of the whole liver * Any contraindication for doxorubicin administration: * serum bilirubin \>5mg/dL, * WBC \<3000 cells/mm3 * neutrophil \<1500 cells/mm3, * cardiac ejection fraction \<50 percent assessed by isotopic ventriculography, echocardiography or MRI * Any contraindication for hepatic embolisation procedures: * porto-systemic shunt, * hepatofugal blood flow; * impaired clotting tests (platelet count \<50000/mm3, prothrombin activity \<50 percent), * renal insufficiency/failure, serum creatinine \> 2mg/dl (177umol/l) * severe atheromatosis, * AST and/or ALT \>5x ULN or, when greater \>250U/l * Women who are pregnant or breast feeding * Allergy to contrast media * Contraindication to hepatic artery catheterisation, such as severe peripheral vascular disease precluding catheterisation * The availability of alternative therapies those, in the judgment of the physician (referring or treating), are more appropriate for the patient * Any co-morbid disease or condition or event that, in the investigator's judgment, would place the patient at undue risk, that would preclude the safe use of DC Bead™, or TACE * Patients who are contraindicated for MRI

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Objective response rate measured according to RECIST and EASL6 months

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Change in Alpha Fetal Protein (AFP) over time6 months
Time to hospital discharge6 months
Safety6 months
Other procedures or interventions required6 months
Toxicity6 month
Local Tumour Response6 months
Health care resource use6 months
Patient quality of life6 months
Time To Progression6 months
Cardiotoxicity6 months

Countries

Austria, France, Germany, Switzerland

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026