Skip to content

A Comparison of Dalteparin and Tinzaparin for Prevention of Blood Clots in Hemodialysis Patients on Oral Anticoagulants Having Surgery

Tinzaparin Versus Dalteparin for Perioperative Thromboembolic Prophylaxis in Patients With Dialysis Dependent Renal Disease- A Canadian Multicentre Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00260988
Enrollment
29
Registered
2005-12-02
Start date
2003-10-31
Completion date
2008-11-30
Last updated
2014-09-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hemodialysis, Thromboembolism

Keywords

Prophylaxis, Thromboembolic disease, End stage renal disease, Hemodialysis, Pharmacokinetics, Low Molecular Weight Heparin, Innohep, Tinzaparin, Fragmin, Dalteparin, Anti Xa, INR, Oral anticoagulation, warfarin, Coumadin

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to better understand if either dalteparin or tinzaparin is a better drug to use in dialysis patients on blood thinners who are at high risk of developing blood clots and need surgery.

Detailed description

A prospective multicenter randomised trial involving 60 consecutive eligible and consenting patients from teaching hospitals in Canada. Patients will be randomised to either tinzaparin or dalteparin to investigate the pharmacokinetics of both low molecular weight heparins (LMWH) perioperatively in a special population, namely end stage renal disease (ESRD) dialysis patients. To date although there exists evidence to suggest tinzaparin may be safe in patients on hemodialysis, LMWHs as a group have not been investigated in the perioperative setting in these patients. This protocol has been developed so that the pharmacokinetic behaviour of tinzaparin and dalteparin can be compared but also so that the duration off warfarin is minimised. Therapeutic doses of LMWH are administered pre-procedure during as much time of the period as possible that oral anticoagulation is sub-therapeutic.

Interventions

200 IU/Kg/Day administered subcutaneously for three days prior to but not including the day of the surgery

175 IU/kg/Day administered subcutaneously for three days prior to but not including the day of the surgery

Sponsors

LEO Pharma
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Ottawa Hospital Research Institute
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Informed consent * Patients aged \>= 18 with end stage renal disease requiring chronic hemodialysis (HD) three times a week and clinically stable on HD for 4 weeks (x 4 wks) * Patients requiring active oral anticoagulation for prosthetic heart valves, recent deep vein thrombosis \>= 1 month, or patients with atrial fibrillation and a major risk factor (previous transient ischemic attack \[TIA\] or stroke, high blood pressure, diabetes, aged \>= 75, moderate/severe left ventricle dysfunction) who require elective non-cardiac surgery or an invasive procedure with reversal of their anticoagulant therapy.

Exclusion criteria

* Evidence of active bleeding prior to stopping warfarin * Hemoglobin \<= 90 or platelet count \<= 100x10\^9/L * Uncontrolled hypertension or stroke within 6 months of study commencement * Spinal or neurosurgery * Eye surgery (excluding cataract surgery) * Life expectancy less than 3 months * Patients requiring cardiac surgery * Presence of active duodenal ulcer

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Primary outcome will be the comparison of the pharmacokinetic profiles of dalteparin and tinzaparin in patients on hemodialysis in the setting of perioperative anticoagulation for thromboembolic prophylaxis. Specifically pre-dialysis anti-Xa levels postPre-dialysis following the third dose of LMWHAnti-Xa levels were drawn pre-dialysis (at a timepoint that was within 20-24hrs post- LMWH dose) and post- dialysis

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The frequency of surgery cancellationCumulatively collected at end of studyWe will collect data on reasons why surgeries were cancelled in this patient population
Bleeding complicationsAny reported and elicited bleeding event will be captured throughout the study period

Countries

Canada

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026