Skip to content

Graft Patency in Beating Heart Vs. Conventional CABG Using Cardiac CT

Graft Patency Following Off-Pump CABG Vs. On-Pump CABG Using 64 MDCT Bypass Graft CT Angiography

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00259493
Enrollment
350
Registered
2005-11-29
Start date
2005-12-31
Completion date
2007-10-31
Last updated
2006-09-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Coronary Artery Disease Amenable to Bypass Graft Surgery

Keywords

Coronary Artery Disease, Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery, Off-pump CABG, Cardiac CT, Bypass Graft CT angiography

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to compare graft patency rates following coronary artery bypass graft surgery performed by beating heart vs. conventional techniques using cardiac CT scanning to evaluate the bypass grafts.

Detailed description

The issue of whether to perform conventional CABG or off-pump CABG continues to be the subject of debate. Controversy remains regarding the appropriateness of applying OPCAB to all patients as opposed to selected sub-populations. The main strategy of CABG is to obtain complete revascularization with the least morbidity and highest long-term patency rates. Current medical literature is conflicted regarding graft patency rates in OPCAB vs. conventional CABG. Data is also limited due to patient refusal for conventional angiography to assess grafts following surgery. Cardiac computed tomography (CT) offers a non-invasive method to assess graft patency that is 100% accurate for the diagnosis of graft patency vs. occlusion. This study is a prospective randomized controlled trial evaluating graft patency in on-pump vs. off-pump CABG using cardiac CT scanning. The study hypothesis is that graft patency rates will be equivalent between the two techniques.

Interventions

PROCEDUREOff-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery

Sponsors

Toshiba America Medical Systems, Inc.
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Trillium Health Centre
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Surgery indicated * Patient is hemodynamically stable * Isolated coronary artery surgery (no valve) * No contraindications to cardiopulmonary bypass * No previous surgery (not redo CABG)

Exclusion criteria

* critically ill patient with hemodynamic instability. * concomitant cardiac procedures. * inability to provide written informed consent. * prior severe reaction to contrast dye : * life-threatening anaphylactoid reactions * cardiac dysrhythmias and arrest * cardiovascular and pulmonary collapse * elevated serum creatinine (\>150 mmol/L). * contraindications to cardiopulmonary bypass. * Age \< 18 years .

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Graft patency as determined by bypass graft CT angiography at 3 months and 12 months following surgery

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Length of Hospital Stay
Blood Loss
Operative Time
Post-op Complications
Quality of Life Assessment

Countries

Canada

Contacts

Primary ContactKathy Ariss, BSc, RN
kariss@thc.on.ca416-400-4753

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026