Skip to content

Effectiveness of Three Manual Physical Therapy Techniques in a Subgroup of Patients With Low Back Pain

Comparison of the Effectiveness of Three Manual Physical Therapy Techniques in a Subgroup of Patients With Low Back Pain Who Satisfy a Clinical Prediction Rule: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00257998
Enrollment
240
Registered
2005-11-24
Start date
2005-11-30
Completion date
2007-10-31
Last updated
2007-11-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Low Back Pain

Brief summary

Recently a clinical prediction rule (CPR) has been developed and validated that accurately identifies patients with low back pain that are likely to benefit from a lumbo-pelvic manipulation. The studies that developed and validated the rule used the identical manipulation procedure. However, recent evidence suggests that different manual therapy techniques may result in the same outcome.Purpose: The purpose of this study is to investigate the effectiveness of three different manual therapy techniques in a subgroup of patient with low back pain that satisfy the CPR.

Interventions

PROCEDUREMobilization

manualtherapy techniques

Sponsors

University of Southern California
CollaboratorOTHER
Franklin Pierce University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Chief complaint of pain and/or numbness in the lumbar spine, buttock, and/or lower extremity 2. Oswestry disability score of at least 25% 3. Age greater than 18 years and less than 60 years 4. At least four out of five of the following criteria: 1. Duration of current episode \< 16 days (judged from the patient's self-report) 2. No symptoms extending distal to the knee (judged from the pain diagram) 3. FABQ-W score \<19 4. At least one hip with \>350 internal rotation range of motion (measured in prone) 5. Stiffness in the lumbar spine (judged from segmental mobility testing)

Exclusion criteria

1. Red flags noted in the participant's general medical screening questionnaire (i.e. tumor, metabolic diseases, RA, osteoporosis, prolonged history of steroid use, etc.) 2. Signs consistent with nerve root compression, this includes any one of the following: 1. Reproduction of low back or leg pain with straight leg raise at less than 450 2. Muscle weakness involving a major muscle group of the lower extremity 3. Diminished lower extremity muscle stretch reflex (Quadriceps or Achilles tendon) 4. Diminished or absent sensation to pinprick in any lower extremity dermatome 3. Prior surgery to the lumbar spine or buttock 4. Current pregnancy 5. Past medical history of osteoporosis or spinal compression fracture 6. Inability to comply with treatment schedule (weekly sessions for four weeks)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The Oswestry Disability Index, which will serve as the primary outcome measure.4 weeks, 6 months

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 6, 2026