Skip to content

Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Pitavastatin and Pravastatin in Elderly Patients

Study Of Pitavastatin 1 Mg Vs. Pravastatin 10 Mg, Pitavastatin 2 Mg Vs. Pravastatin 20 Mg And Pitavastatin 4 Mg Vs. Pravastatin 40 Mg (Following Up-Titration) In Elderly Patients With Primary Hypercholesterolemia Or Combined Dyslipidemia

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00257686
Enrollment
962
Registered
2005-11-23
Start date
2005-09-30
Completion date
2006-05-31
Last updated
2010-03-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hypercholesterolemia or Combined Dyslipidemia

Keywords

Kowa, Hypercholesterolemia, combined, dyslipidemia, elderly, pitavastatin, NK-104

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety of pitavastatin with that of pravastatin in elderly patients

Detailed description

Following a wash-out dietary lead-in period, patients will receive either Preavastatin or Pitavastatin during 12 weeks, in order to establish the efficacy of pitavastatin in reducing cholesterol levels.

Interventions

DRUGPitavastatin
DRUGPravastatin

Sponsors

Kowa Research Europe
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
65 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Males and postmenopausal females (aged 65 years and older * Eligible, able to participate, have given informed consent * Must have been following a restrictive diet * Diagnosis of primary hypercholesterolemia or combined dyslipidemia * Serum CK must be less than or equal to 1.5 x ULRR at 2 of 3 permitted evaluations between Week -4 and -1 * Agree to be available

Exclusion criteria

* Homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia * Conditions which may cause secondary dyslipidemia * Uncontrolled diabetes mellitus (HbA1c \>8%). * Any condition which might significantly alter the absorption, distribution, metabolism, or excretion of any drug. * History of pancreatic injury or pancreatitis, or impaired pancreatic function/injury * Liver injury * Impaired renal function * Current obstruction of the urinary tract or difficulty in voiding due to mechanical as well as inflammatory conditions, which is likely to require intervention during the course of the study or is regarded as clinically meaningful * Serum CK \>5 x ULRR without clinical explanation * Uncontrolled hypothyroidism defined as TSH \>ULRR * Any severe acute illness or severe trauma in the last 3 months prior to Visit 1 * Major surgery, 3 months prior to Visit 1 * Significant CVD prior to randomization * Evidence of symptomatic heart failure, gross cardiac enlargement; significant heart block or cardiac arrhythmias. History of uncontrolled complex ventricular arrhythmias, uncontrolled atrial fibrillation/flutter or uncontrolled supraventricular tachycardias with a ventricular response rate of \> 100 beats per minute at rest. * Left ventricular ejection fraction \<0.25; * History of symptomatic cerebrovascular disease * Any other conditions at the discretion of the investigator * Known HIV infection * Poorly controlled or uncontrolled hypertension * Prior or current known muscular or neuromuscular disease of any type; * Neoplastic disease * Drug abuse or continuous consumption of more than 65 mL pure alcohol per day * Exposure to any investigational new drug within 30 days of study entry or ingestion of any drug known to be toxic to a major organ system * Current or recent use of supplements known to alter lipid metabolism * History of hypersensitivity to other HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors; * Concomitant medication not permitted * Resistant to lipid-lowering medications. Known hypersensitivity or intolerance to any lipid lowering agent * Excessive obesity * Any factor which makes regular clinic attendance in the morning impractical ---Signs of mental dysfunction or other factors likely to limit ability to cooperate with the study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percent Change From Baseline in LDL-CBaseline to 12 weeksPercent change from baseline in low density cholesterol (LDL-C)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percent Change From Baseline in TCBaseline to 12 weeksPercent change from baseline in total cholesterol (TC)

Countries

Denmark, Germany, Israel, Netherlands, United Kingdom

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Pitavastatin 1 mg
Pitavastatin 1 mg once daily
207
Pravastatin 10 mg
Pravastatin 10 mg once daily
103
Pitavastatin 2 mg
Pitavastatin 2 mg once daily
224
Pravastatin 20 mg
Pravastatin 20 mg once daily
96
Pitavastatin 4 mg
Pitavastatin 4 mg once daily
210
Pravastatin 40 mg
Pravastatin 40 mg once daily
102
Total942

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPravastatin 10 mgPitavastatin 2 mgPravastatin 20 mgPitavastatin 4 mgPravastatin 40 mgPitavastatin 1 mgTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
103 Participants224 Participants96 Participants210 Participants102 Participants207 Participants942 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age Continuous70.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.61
70.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.49
69.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.51
70.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.1
70.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.94
70.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.6
70.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.49
Sex: Female, Male
Female
54 Participants124 Participants48 Participants121 Participants42 Participants118 Participants507 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
49 Participants100 Participants48 Participants89 Participants60 Participants89 Participants435 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
EG004
affected / at risk
EG005
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
59 / —36 / —62 / —24 / —52 / —23 / —
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / —0 / —2 / —1 / —3 / —3 / —

Outcome results

Primary

Percent Change From Baseline in LDL-C

Percent change from baseline in low density cholesterol (LDL-C)

Time frame: Baseline to 12 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Pitavastatin 1 mgPercent Change From Baseline in LDL-C-31.43 Percent changeStandard Deviation 11.833
Pravastatin 10 mgPercent Change From Baseline in LDL-C-22.41 Percent changeStandard Deviation 14.051
Pitavastatin 2 mgPercent Change From Baseline in LDL-C-38.99 Percent changeStandard Deviation 13.069
Pravastatin 20 mgPercent Change From Baseline in LDL-C-28.83 Percent changeStandard Deviation 11.054
Pitavastatin 4 mgPercent Change From Baseline in LDL-C-44.31 Percent changeStandard Deviation 13.695
Pravastatin 40 mgPercent Change From Baseline in LDL-C-33.98 Percent changeStandard Deviation 14.299
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline in TC

Percent change from baseline in total cholesterol (TC)

Time frame: Baseline to 12 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Pitavastatin 1 mgPercent Change From Baseline in TC-22.19 Percent changeStandard Deviation 8.899
Pravastatin 10 mgPercent Change From Baseline in TC-15.34 Percent changeStandard Deviation 11.037
Pitavastatin 2 mgPercent Change From Baseline in TC-26.68 Percent changeStandard Deviation 9.429
Pravastatin 20 mgPercent Change From Baseline in TC-20.61 Percent changeStandard Deviation 8.426
Pitavastatin 4 mgPercent Change From Baseline in TC-30.75 Percent changeStandard Deviation 10.461
Pravastatin 40 mgPercent Change From Baseline in TC-24.07 Percent changeStandard Deviation 10.907

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026