Skip to content

Safety And Efficacy Of Ziprasidone In Adolescents With Schizophrenia

Six Week, Double-Blind, Placebo Controlled Phase III Trial Evaluating The Efficacy, Safety And Pharmacokinetics Of Flexible Doses Of Oral Ziprasidone In Adolescent Subjects With Schizophrenia

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00257192
Enrollment
284
Registered
2005-11-22
Start date
2006-04-30
Completion date
2009-03-31
Last updated
2021-03-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Schizophrenia

Keywords

Adolescent Subjects With Schizophrenia

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to determine if flexibly-dosed ziprasidone is safe and effective for the treatment of adolescents (ages 13-17) with schizophrenia

Detailed description

Termination Reason: On March 24, 2009, Pfizer Inc. stopped late stage Geodon pediatric clinical trials in schizophrenia (A1281134 - placebo controlled; A1281135 - open label). As recommended by the DSMB, these studies were stopped due to lack of efficacy. No safety concerns were identified.

Interventions

DRUGplacebo

Placebo matching the oral ziprasidone capsules of 20 mg, 40 mg, 60 mg, and 80 mg strength or matching placebo. Subjects will be dosed daily for 6 weeks using a flexible dose design with a minimal dose range of 40mg twice a day (BID) to a maximum dose range of 80 mg BID. For subjects weighing \<45 kg, the doses will range from 20 mg BID to 40 mg BID.

Oral ziprasidone capsules of 20 mg, 40 mg, 60 mg, and 80 mg strength or matching placebo. Subjects will be dosed daily for 6 weeks using a flexible dose design with a minimal dose range of 40mg BID to a maximum dose range of 80 mg BID. For subjects weighing \<45 kg, the doses will range from 20 mg BID to 40 mg BID.

Sponsors

Pfizer's Upjohn has merged with Mylan to form Viatris Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
13 Years to 17 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th Edition (DSM-IV) criteria for schizophrenia: Current symptoms were to be present for at least 7 days before screening. * At the Screening and Baseline visits, subjects must have had a Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale - Anchored score ≥35 and a score of ≥4 on at least 1 of the following items: unusual thought content (i.e., delusions), hallucinations, suspiciousness, or conceptual disorganization. * Age 13 - 17 years

Exclusion criteria

* Imminent risk of suicide or homicide, as judged by the site investigator * Any history of serious or unstable medical illness, including risk for QT prolongation

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale - Anchored (BPRS-A) Total Score at Week 6Baseline, Week 6BPRS-A: 18-item clinician rated scale to assess somatic concern, anxiety, emotional withdrawal, disorganization, hallucinatory behavior, guilt feelings, suspiciousness, disorientation, tension, mannerisms, posturing, grandiosity, depressive mood, hostility, motor retardation, uncooperativeness, unusual thought content, blunted affect, and excitement. Ratings anchored to improve consistency for a single rater over time or between raters. Items rated on 7-point scale 0 (not present) to 6 (extremely severe). Total score=sum of items (range 0 to 108); higher scores indicate increased pathology.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) - Total Score at Week 6Baseline, Week 6PANSS: 30-item clinician-rated scale to measure severity of psychopathology (16 items); positive scale (7 items); negative scale (7 items); summarized as positive score, negative score, and total score. Items scored on anchored Likert scale rated 1 (absent symptoms) to 7 (extreme); scores above 1 indicate clinical symptom is present; scores from 2 to 7 indicate increased severity. Total score range 30 to 210: higher score indicates greater severity.
Change From Baseline in PANSS: Positive and Negative Subscales at Week 6Baseline, Week 6PANSS: 30-item clinician-rated scale to measure severity of psychopathology (16 items); positive scale (7 items); negative scale (7 items); summarized as positive score, negative score, and total score. Items scored on anchored Likert scale rated 1 (absent symptoms) to 7 (extreme); scores above 1 indicate clinical symptom is present; scores from 2 to 7 indicate increased severity. Total score range 30 to 210: higher score indicates greater severity.
Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) Score at Week 6Baseline, Week 6CGI-I: single-item clinician rated scale used to assess the subject's improvement or worsening from baseline. Scores range from 1 (very much improved) to 4 (no change) to 7 (very much worse); higher score indicates more affected.
Change From Baseline in Children's Global Assessment Scale (CGAS)Baseline, Week 2, Week 4, Week 6, Early termination (ET)CGAS: clinician-rated global assessment item for children based on symptoms and social functioning in home, school, and community settings. Scores on this single item range from 1 to 100 (higher levels indicate greater health) with descriptive anchors for every 10-point interval. Scores above 70 on this scale are considered within the normal range; lower score indicates need for increased supervision.
Change From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ)Baseline, Week 6, ETCHQ: 50-item, 15 subscale parent or legal guardian assessed instrument of child's physical, emotional, social well-being, and relative burden of disease on the parents; rated on Likert-type scale: range 0 to 100; higher scores indicate a more positive health status. Global indicators for Physical Health and Psychosocial Health are weighted composites derived from subscale items using scoring algorithms (transformed scores); range 0 to 100: higher scores indicate more positive health status.
Change From Baseline in Children's Problem Behavior and Aggression Questionnaire (CPBAQ) Total ScoreBaseline, Week 1 through Week 6CPBAQ: 19-item parent or legal guardian completed questionnaire to rate the child's verbal (such as yelling or cursing) and physical aggression (such a fighting with peers or being cruel to an animal) during the past week. Behavior was rated on a 4-point scale; range 0 (behavior did not occur or was not a problem) to 3 (behavior occurred a lot or was severe problem). Total score range 0 to 57; higher scores indicate a greater frequency and severity of aggression.
Change From Baseline in Child Depression Rating Scale - Revised (CDRS-R): Total ScoreBaseline, Week 1 through Week 6CDRS-R: clinician-rated interview-based scale (with both child and parent or guardian) to assess 17 distinct symptom areas to derive an index of depression severity. Discrepancies between informants' responses were resolved by using most impaired rating given by valid informant. Rated on a 7-point scale; range from 1 (no impairment) to 7 (indicates greater impairment). Total score calculated as sum of the 17 items (range 1 to 119); higher score indicates greater impairment.
Change From Baseline in Child Depression Rating Scale - Revised (CDRS-R): Suicide Ideation Item 13Baseline, Week 1 through Week 6CDRS-R: clinician-rated interview-based scale (with both child and parent or guardian) to assess 17 distinct symptom areas to derive an index of depression severity. Discrepancies between informants' responses were resolved by using most impaired rating given by valid informant. Suicide Ideation (Item 13) detects changes in suicidality over time. Rated on a 7-point scale; range from 1 (no impairment) to 7 (indicates greater impairment).
Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impression of Severity (CGI-S) Score at Week 6Baseline, Week 6CGI-S: single-item clinician rated scale to rate the severity of a subject's illness over time. Scores range from 1 (normal, not at all ill) to 7 (among the most severely ill subjects); higher score indicates more affected.
Change From Baseline in CNS Vital Signs Cognitive Test Battery (Includes Sedation Item): SubscalesBaseline, Week 6, ETA computerized subject-administered test battery with subtests for verbal and visual memory, processing speed, nonverbal reasoning, executive functioning, working memory, and sustained attention. A computerized 7-point sedation item (0 \[not sleepy\] to 10 \[very sleepy\]) was completed prior to test battery. The Neurocognitive index score was derived from subtest scores per an algorithm. The index score and subtest scores assessed the subject's changes in cognition. Scores were rated as above average (score \>109), average (90 to 109), below average (80 to 89), or well below average (70 to 79).
Change From Baseline in CNS Vital Signs Cognitive Test Battery: Neurocognitive IndexBaseline, Week 6, ETA computerized subject-administered test battery with subtests for verbal and visual memory, processing speed, nonverbal reasoning, executive functioning, working memory, and sustained attention. A computerized 7-point sedation item (0 \[not sleepy\] to 10 \[very sleepy\]) was completed prior to test battery. The Neurocognitive index score was derived from subtest scores per an algorithm. The index score and subtest scores assessed the subject's changes in cognition. Scores were rated as above average (score \>109), average (90 to 109), below average (80 to 89), or well below average (70 to 79).
Change From Baseline in Movement Disorder Scales: Simpson-Angus Rating Scale (SARS)Baseline, Week 1 through Week 6SARS: 10-item clinician rated instrument to assess parkinsonian symptoms (7 items) and related extrapyramidal side effects (3 items): gait, arm dropping, shoulder shaking, elbow rigidity, leg pendulousness, glabellar tap, tremor, and salivation. Head dropping (modified SARS item 7) substituted for head rotation. Anchored 5-point scale: range 0 (absence of condition, normal) to 4 (most extreme form of condition). Total score is sum of individual item scores (range 0 to 40); higher score indicates more affected.
Change From Baseline in Movement Disorder Scales: Barnes Akathisia Rating Scale (BAS) Global Clinical Assessment ItemBaseline, Week 1 through Week 6BAS: clinician rated scale to assess akathisia to determine the degree of subjective restlessness and distress associated with restlessness. First 3 items (Objective, Subjective, and Distress related to restlessness) rated on a 4-point scale with range 0 (no symptoms) to 3 (increased severity of symptoms). Item 4 Global Clinical Assessment of Akathisia rated on a 6-point scale range 0 (no symptoms) to 5 (increased severity of symptoms); higher score indicates increased severity. All rating are anchored. Only the Global Clinical Assessment of Akathisia was to be analyzed.
Change From Baseline in Movement Disorder Scales: Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) Movement Cluster ScoreBaseline, Week 1 through Week 6AIMS: clinician rated 12-item scale to rate 7 body areas and global judgments on the severity of abnormal movements, incapacitation and subject's awareness of abnormal movements. Items 1 to 10 scored 0 (none) to 4 (severe) (total possible score 0 to 40; higher score indicates greater severity); items 11 to 14 are No or Yes response to dental status and sleep movements. Only the sum of the first 7 items to be analyzed (AIMS Movement Cluster score). Total score 0 to 28; higher score indicates greater severity.
Number of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School SituationBaseline, Week 2, Week 6, ETSchool placement questionnaire: parent or legal guardian assessed questionnaire to determine whether the child is currently enrolled in school (or planned to be enrolled if on school holiday like summer break), whether attending regularly if enrolled, and how well the child is doing overall in school. Questions were modified from those used in the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) funded Treatment of Early Onset Schizophrenia Spectrum (TEOSS) study. Results determine whether subjects are currently attending school and qualitatively describe how well they are doing in school.
Number of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School AttendanceBaseline, Week 2, Week 6, ETSchool placement questionnaire: parent or legal guardian assessed questionnaire to determine whether the child is currently enrolled in school (or planned to be enrolled if on school holiday like summer break), whether attending regularly if enrolled, and how well the child is doing overall in school. Questions were modified from those used in the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) funded Treatment of Early Onset Schizophrenia Spectrum (TEOSS) study. Results determine whether subjects are currently attending school and qualitatively describe how well they are doing in school.
Number of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: Overall School PerformanceBaseline, Week 2, Week 6, ETSchool placement questionnaire: parent or legal guardian assessed questionnaire to determine whether the child is currently enrolled in school (or planned to be enrolled if on school holiday like summer break), whether attending regularly if enrolled, and how well the child is doing overall in school. Questions were modified from those used in the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) funded Treatment of Early Onset Schizophrenia Spectrum (TEOSS) study. Results determine whether subjects are currently attending school and qualitatively describe how well they are doing in school.
Change From Baseline in Child Depression Rating Scale - Revised (CDRS-R): Impaired Schoolwork Item 1Baseline, Week 2, Week 6Clinician-rated interview-based scale (with both child and parent or guardian) to assess 17 distinct symptom areas to derive an index of depression severity. Discrepancies between informants' responses resolved by using most impaired rating given by valid informant. Impaired Schoolwork (Item 1) assesses school function for the subgroup of subjects reported to be in school. Rated on a 7-point scale; range from 1 (no impairment) to 7 (indicates greater impairment).

Countries

Colombia, Costa Rica, India, Malaysia, Peru, Russia, Singapore, Ukraine, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

A planned interim analysis resulted in recommendation from Data Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB) to terminate study due to futility per the interim analysis charter (p-value = 0.9840). Only one active subject in the study was affected by this decision.

Pre-assignment details

Screening visit followed by a 1 to 10 day period to allow for wash-out of exclusionary medications.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Ziprasidone
Oral (PO) capsules administered twice daily (BID) with meals; titrated from a starting dose of 20 milligrams per day (mg/day) over 2 weeks with dose increases of 20 mg/day every second day up to a target dose range of 120 to 160 mg/day for subjects with body weight ≥ 45 kilograms (kg); target dose for subjects with body weight \< 45 kg is 60 to 80 mg/day. After titration dose is attained, flexible dosing range of 80 to 160 (if body weight ≥ 45 kg) or 40 to 80 mg/day (if body weight \< 45 kg) for duration of the study.
193
Placebo
Placebo matching ziprasidone administration: PO capsules administered BID) with meals; titrated from a starting dose of 20 mg/day over 2 weeks with dose increases of 20 mg/day every second day up to a target dose range of 120 to 160 mg/day for subjects with body weight ≥ 45 kg; target dose for subjects with body weight \< 45 kg is 60 to 80 mg/day. After titration dose is attained, flexible dosing range of 80 to 160 (if body weight ≥ 45 kg) or 40 to 80 mg/day (if body weight \< 45 kg) for duration of the study.
90
Total283

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event2110
Overall StudyInsufficient clinical response1818
Overall StudyLaboratory abnormality11
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up33
Overall StudyMiscellaneous04
Overall StudyRandomized but not treated01
Overall StudyStudy terminated by sponsor10
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject142

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicZiprasidoneTotalPlacebo
Age, Continuous15.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.4
15.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.4
15.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.4
Age, Customized
>12 years and <13 years at start of treatment
4 participants4 participants0 participants
Age, Customized
Between 13 and 17 years
189 participants279 participants90 participants
Ethnicity
Hispanic / Latino
21 participants30 participants9 participants
Ethnicity
Not Hispanic / Latino
172 participants253 participants81 participants
Height164.9 centimeters (cm)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.1
165.8 centimeters (cm)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.1
167.8 centimeters (cm)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10
Race
Asian
38 particpants55 particpants17 particpants
Race
Black
17 particpants19 particpants2 particpants
Race
Hispanic
9 particpants12 particpants3 particpants
Race
Other
13 particpants21 particpants8 particpants
Race
White
116 particpants176 particpants60 particpants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
84 Participants112 Participants28 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
109 Participants171 Participants62 Participants
Tanner adolescent pubertal self-assessment: Breast (females)
Missing (not answered)
2 particpants2 particpants0 particpants
Tanner adolescent pubertal self-assessment: Breast (females)
Not applicable
109 particpants171 particpants62 particpants
Tanner adolescent pubertal self-assessment: Breast (females)
Stage 1
0 particpants1 particpants1 particpants
Tanner adolescent pubertal self-assessment: Breast (females)
Stage 2
6 particpants9 particpants3 particpants
Tanner adolescent pubertal self-assessment: Breast (females)
Stage 3
16 particpants20 particpants4 particpants
Tanner adolescent pubertal self-assessment: Breast (females)
Stage 4
35 particpants46 particpants11 particpants
Tanner adolescent pubertal self-assessment: Breast (females)
Stage 5
25 particpants34 particpants9 particpants
Tanner adolescent pubertal self-assessment: Genitalia (males)
Missing (not answered)
2 participants2 participants0 participants
Tanner adolescent pubertal self-assessment: Genitalia (males)
Not applicable
82 participants110 participants28 participants
Tanner adolescent pubertal self-assessment: Genitalia (males)
Stage 1
0 participants1 participants1 participants
Tanner adolescent pubertal self-assessment: Genitalia (males)
Stage 2
9 participants12 participants3 participants
Tanner adolescent pubertal self-assessment: Genitalia (males)
Stage 3
25 participants41 participants16 participants
Tanner adolescent pubertal self-assessment: Genitalia (males)
Stage 4
57 participants83 participants26 participants
Tanner adolescent pubertal self-assessment: Genitalia (males)
Stage 5
18 participants34 participants16 participants
Tanner adolescent pubertal self-assessment: Pubic hair (females and males)
Missing (not answered)
2 participants2 participants0 participants
Tanner adolescent pubertal self-assessment: Pubic hair (females and males)
Stage 1
0 participants3 participants3 participants
Tanner adolescent pubertal self-assessment: Pubic hair (females and males)
Stage 2
13 participants20 participants7 participants
Tanner adolescent pubertal self-assessment: Pubic hair (females and males)
Stage 3
36 participants49 participants13 participants
Tanner adolescent pubertal self-assessment: Pubic hair (females and males)
Stage 4
90 participants133 participants43 participants
Tanner adolescent pubertal self-assessment: Pubic hair (females and males)
Stage 5
52 participants76 participants24 participants
Weight61.2 kilograms (kg)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.5
62.2 kilograms (kg)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.6
64.3 kilograms (kg)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.7

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
110 / 19327 / 90
serious
Total, serious adverse events
9 / 1931 / 90

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline in Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale - Anchored (BPRS-A) Total Score at Week 6

BPRS-A: 18-item clinician rated scale to assess somatic concern, anxiety, emotional withdrawal, disorganization, hallucinatory behavior, guilt feelings, suspiciousness, disorientation, tension, mannerisms, posturing, grandiosity, depressive mood, hostility, motor retardation, uncooperativeness, unusual thought content, blunted affect, and excitement. Ratings anchored to improve consistency for a single rater over time or between raters. Items rated on 7-point scale 0 (not present) to 6 (extremely severe). Total score=sum of items (range 0 to 108); higher scores indicate increased pathology.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 6

Population: Intent to treat (ITT): all randomized subjects who had baseline measurements, took at least 1 dose of study medication, and had at least 1 post-baseline visit. N=number of subjects with analyzable data at post-baseline observation.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
ZiprasidoneChange From Baseline in Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale - Anchored (BPRS-A) Total Score at Week 6-14.16 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.78
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale - Anchored (BPRS-A) Total Score at Week 6-12.35 scores on a scaleStandard Error 1.05
Comparison: Sample size for 85% power 2-tailed 0.05 significance level based on expected difference of -5 with average within-group standard deviation=13 was 276 subjects (2 to 1 ratio of enrollment: 184 ziprasidone, 92 placebo). Interim analysis at 60 percent (%) enrollment (ITT population): may stop trial early for efficacy (2-sided p-value less than (\<) 0.0124) or for futility (2-sided p-value greater than (\>) 0.4772; The final analysis is to employ a 2-sided p-value \<0.0462.p-value: 0.15395% CI: [-4.28, 0.67]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Child Depression Rating Scale - Revised (CDRS-R): Impaired Schoolwork Item 1

Clinician-rated interview-based scale (with both child and parent or guardian) to assess 17 distinct symptom areas to derive an index of depression severity. Discrepancies between informants' responses resolved by using most impaired rating given by valid informant. Impaired Schoolwork (Item 1) assesses school function for the subgroup of subjects reported to be in school. Rated on a 7-point scale; range from 1 (no impairment) to 7 (indicates greater impairment).

Time frame: Baseline, Week 2, Week 6

Population: ITT; N=number of subjects with analyzable data at baseline; (n)=number of subjects with analyzable data at post-baseline observation for ziprasidone and placebo, respectively. LOCF imputation used for Week 6 LOCF timepoint.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ZiprasidoneChange From Baseline in Child Depression Rating Scale - Revised (CDRS-R): Impaired Schoolwork Item 1Week 2 (n=38, 15)-0.3 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.9
ZiprasidoneChange From Baseline in Child Depression Rating Scale - Revised (CDRS-R): Impaired Schoolwork Item 1Week 6 (n=30, 8)-0.6 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.1
ZiprasidoneChange From Baseline in Child Depression Rating Scale - Revised (CDRS-R): Impaired Schoolwork Item 1Week 6 [LOCF] (n=39, 15)-0.6 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Child Depression Rating Scale - Revised (CDRS-R): Impaired Schoolwork Item 1Week 2 (n=38, 15)-0.2 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Child Depression Rating Scale - Revised (CDRS-R): Impaired Schoolwork Item 1Week 6 (n=30, 8)-0.1 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.4
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Child Depression Rating Scale - Revised (CDRS-R): Impaired Schoolwork Item 1Week 6 [LOCF] (n=39, 15)-0.1 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.1
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Child Depression Rating Scale - Revised (CDRS-R): Suicide Ideation Item 13

CDRS-R: clinician-rated interview-based scale (with both child and parent or guardian) to assess 17 distinct symptom areas to derive an index of depression severity. Discrepancies between informants' responses were resolved by using most impaired rating given by valid informant. Suicide Ideation (Item 13) detects changes in suicidality over time. Rated on a 7-point scale; range from 1 (no impairment) to 7 (indicates greater impairment).

Time frame: Baseline, Week 1 through Week 6

Population: ITT; N=number of subjects with analyzable data at baseline; (n)=number of subjects with analyzable data at post-baseline observation for ziprasidone and placebo, respectively. LOCF imputation used for Week 6 LOCF timepoint.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ZiprasidoneChange From Baseline in Child Depression Rating Scale - Revised (CDRS-R): Suicide Ideation Item 13Week 1 (n=188, 86)-0.1 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.4
ZiprasidoneChange From Baseline in Child Depression Rating Scale - Revised (CDRS-R): Suicide Ideation Item 13Week 6 [LOCF] (n=189, 87)0.0 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.6
ZiprasidoneChange From Baseline in Child Depression Rating Scale - Revised (CDRS-R): Suicide Ideation Item 13Week 5 (n=141, 54)0.0 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.4
ZiprasidoneChange From Baseline in Child Depression Rating Scale - Revised (CDRS-R): Suicide Ideation Item 13Week 3 (n=165, 74)-0.1 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.5
ZiprasidoneChange From Baseline in Child Depression Rating Scale - Revised (CDRS-R): Suicide Ideation Item 13Week 6 (n=134, 52)-0.0 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.3
ZiprasidoneChange From Baseline in Child Depression Rating Scale - Revised (CDRS-R): Suicide Ideation Item 13Week 2 (n=182, 86)-0.0 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.5
ZiprasidoneChange From Baseline in Child Depression Rating Scale - Revised (CDRS-R): Suicide Ideation Item 13Week 4 (n=154, 63)0.0 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.5
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Child Depression Rating Scale - Revised (CDRS-R): Suicide Ideation Item 13Week 6 [LOCF] (n=189, 87)-0.0 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.5
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Child Depression Rating Scale - Revised (CDRS-R): Suicide Ideation Item 13Week 2 (n=182, 86)-0.1 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.5
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Child Depression Rating Scale - Revised (CDRS-R): Suicide Ideation Item 13Week 3 (n=165, 74)-0.1 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.3
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Child Depression Rating Scale - Revised (CDRS-R): Suicide Ideation Item 13Week 4 (n=154, 63)-0.1 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.5
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Child Depression Rating Scale - Revised (CDRS-R): Suicide Ideation Item 13Week 5 (n=141, 54)-0.1 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.5
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Child Depression Rating Scale - Revised (CDRS-R): Suicide Ideation Item 13Week 6 (n=134, 52)-0.1 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.4
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Child Depression Rating Scale - Revised (CDRS-R): Suicide Ideation Item 13Week 1 (n=188, 86)-0.0 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.5
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Child Depression Rating Scale - Revised (CDRS-R): Total Score

CDRS-R: clinician-rated interview-based scale (with both child and parent or guardian) to assess 17 distinct symptom areas to derive an index of depression severity. Discrepancies between informants' responses were resolved by using most impaired rating given by valid informant. Rated on a 7-point scale; range from 1 (no impairment) to 7 (indicates greater impairment). Total score calculated as sum of the 17 items (range 1 to 119); higher score indicates greater impairment.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 1 through Week 6

Population: ITT; N=number of subjects with analyzable data at baseline; (n)=number of subjects with analyzable data at post-baseline observation for ziprasidone and placebo, respectively. LOCF imputation used for Week 6 LOCF timepoint.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ZiprasidoneChange From Baseline in Child Depression Rating Scale - Revised (CDRS-R): Total ScoreWeek 5 (n=135, 49)-7.0 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.5
ZiprasidoneChange From Baseline in Child Depression Rating Scale - Revised (CDRS-R): Total ScoreWeek 1 (n=179, 82)-2.8 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.6
ZiprasidoneChange From Baseline in Child Depression Rating Scale - Revised (CDRS-R): Total ScoreWeek 2 (n=174, 80)-4.2 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.3
ZiprasidoneChange From Baseline in Child Depression Rating Scale - Revised (CDRS-R): Total ScoreWeek 3 (n=157, 69)-5.5 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.4
ZiprasidoneChange From Baseline in Child Depression Rating Scale - Revised (CDRS-R): Total ScoreWeek 4 (n=148, 59)-6.0 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.6
ZiprasidoneChange From Baseline in Child Depression Rating Scale - Revised (CDRS-R): Total ScoreWeek 6 (n=126, 47)-7.9 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.9
ZiprasidoneChange From Baseline in Child Depression Rating Scale - Revised (CDRS-R): Total ScoreWeek 6 [LOCF] (n=178, 82)-5.8 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.7
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Child Depression Rating Scale - Revised (CDRS-R): Total ScoreWeek 6 (n=126, 47)-6.5 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.5
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Child Depression Rating Scale - Revised (CDRS-R): Total ScoreWeek 4 (n=148, 59)-4.9 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.6
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Child Depression Rating Scale - Revised (CDRS-R): Total ScoreWeek 1 (n=179, 82)-1.4 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.7
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Child Depression Rating Scale - Revised (CDRS-R): Total ScoreWeek 5 (n=135, 49)-5.6 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.9
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Child Depression Rating Scale - Revised (CDRS-R): Total ScoreWeek 2 (n=174, 80)-2.5 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.6
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Child Depression Rating Scale - Revised (CDRS-R): Total ScoreWeek 6 [LOCF] (n=178, 82)-4.0 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.3
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Child Depression Rating Scale - Revised (CDRS-R): Total ScoreWeek 3 (n=157, 69)-3.2 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.4
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ)

CHQ: 50-item, 15 subscale parent or legal guardian assessed instrument of child's physical, emotional, social well-being, and relative burden of disease on the parents; rated on Likert-type scale: range 0 to 100; higher scores indicate a more positive health status. Global indicators for Physical Health and Psychosocial Health are weighted composites derived from subscale items using scoring algorithms (transformed scores); range 0 to 100: higher scores indicate more positive health status.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 6, ET

Population: ITT. ET includes observations from visits not within windowing criteria. LOCF imputation used for Week 6 LOCF timepoint.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ZiprasidoneChange From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ)Global behavior: Week 6 [LOCF]8.8 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.1
ZiprasidoneChange From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ)Mental health: Week 68.1 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.3
ZiprasidoneChange From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ)Bodily pain: Week 64.4 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.6
ZiprasidoneChange From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ)Mental health: ET1.3 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.9
ZiprasidoneChange From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ)Global health: Week 6 [LOCF]2.8 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.9
ZiprasidoneChange From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ)Mental health: Week 6 [LOCF]6.7 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.1
ZiprasidoneChange From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ)Bodily pain: ET4.7 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 23
ZiprasidoneChange From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ)Physical function: Week 65.6 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.7
ZiprasidoneChange From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ)Family cohesion: Week 61.9 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.3
ZiprasidoneChange From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ)Physical function: ET-5.4 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.5
ZiprasidoneChange From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ)Bodily pain: Week 6 [LOCF]4.5 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.9
ZiprasidoneChange From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ)Physical function: Week 6 [LOCF]3.3 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.8
ZiprasidoneChange From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ)Global health: ET-5.4 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 24
ZiprasidoneChange From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ)Behavior scale: Week 69.0 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.1
ZiprasidoneChange From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ)Behavior scale: ET7.6 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.2
ZiprasidoneChange From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ)Emotion, behavior: Week 616.2 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 29.8
ZiprasidoneChange From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ)Behavior scale: Week 6 [LOCF]8.7 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.7
ZiprasidoneChange From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ)Family cohesion: ET-1.8 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.4
ZiprasidoneChange From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ)Emotion, behavior: ET4.0 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 43.1
ZiprasidoneChange From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ)Self-esteem: ET1.0 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.6
ZiprasidoneChange From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ)Self-esteem: Week 66.0 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.5
ZiprasidoneChange From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ)Self-esteem: Week 6 [LOCF]5.0 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.2
ZiprasidoneChange From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ)Emotion, behavior: Week 6 [LOCF]13.6 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 33.4
ZiprasidoneChange From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ)Family activities: Week 69.2 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.6
ZiprasidoneChange From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ)General health perception: Week 61.1 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.6
ZiprasidoneChange From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ)Family cohesion: Week 6 [LOCF]1.2 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.8
ZiprasidoneChange From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ)General health perception: ET-2.2 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.3
ZiprasidoneChange From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ)Time impact on parent: Week 68.8 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.4
ZiprasidoneChange From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ)General health perception: Week 6 [LOCF]0.4 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.8
ZiprasidoneChange From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ)Global behavior: Week 69.4 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.6
ZiprasidoneChange From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ)Time impact on parent: ET2.0 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.8
ZiprasidoneChange From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ)Family activities: ET1.3 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.8
ZiprasidoneChange From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ)Physical health: Week 63.5 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 33.9
ZiprasidoneChange From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ)Family activities: Week 6 [LOCF]7.5 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.7
ZiprasidoneChange From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ)Change in health: Week 60.5 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.1
ZiprasidoneChange From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ)Time impact on parent: Week 6 [LOCF]7.4 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.5
ZiprasidoneChange From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ)Change in health: ET-0.4 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1
ZiprasidoneChange From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ)Change in health: Week 6 [LOCF]0.3 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.1
ZiprasidoneChange From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ)Global behavior: ET6.4 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.4
ZiprasidoneChange From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ)Physical health global subscale: Week 61.8 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.7
ZiprasidoneChange From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ)Emotional impact on parent: Week 68.9 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.6
ZiprasidoneChange From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ)Physical health global subscale: ET-2.8 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.8
ZiprasidoneChange From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ)Physical health: ET-6.5 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 32.9
ZiprasidoneChange From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ)Physical health global subscale: Week 6 [LOCF]0.9 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.3
ZiprasidoneChange From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ)Emotional impact on parent: ET3.5 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.2
ZiprasidoneChange From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ)Psychosocial health global subscale: Week 66.6 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.5
ZiprasidoneChange From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ)Physical health: Week 6 [LOCF]1.4 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 33.8
ZiprasidoneChange From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ)Psychosocial health global subscale: ET3.1 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.4
ZiprasidoneChange From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ)Emotional impact on parent: Week 6 [LOCF]7.7 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.6
ZiprasidoneChange From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ)Psychosocial health global subscale: Week 6 [LOCF]5.9 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.8
ZiprasidoneChange From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ)Global health: Week 65.0 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.2
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ)Psychosocial health global subscale: Week 6 [LOCF]4.8 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 10
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ)Global health: ET-9.1 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.4
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ)Behavior scale: Week 69.0 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.8
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ)Family activities: Week 6 [LOCF]7.8 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 22
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ)Change in health: ET-0.1 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.8
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ)Global health: Week 68.5 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.7
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ)Global health: Week 6 [LOCF]1.4 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.7
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ)Global behavior: Week 610.9 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.1
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ)Global behavior: ET-0.5 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 23
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ)Global behavior: Week 6 [LOCF]6.5 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.1
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ)Family cohesion: Week 6-0.8 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.7
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ)Family cohesion: ET-2.6 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.1
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ)Family cohesion: Week 6 [LOCF]-1.1 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.1
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ)Physical health: Week 65.0 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 28
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ)Physical health: ET3.2 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.3
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ)Physical health: Week 6 [LOCF]4.8 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 26
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ)Bodily pain: Week 68.0 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.4
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ)Bodily pain: ET0.0 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.6
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ)Bodily pain: Week 6 [LOCF]4.9 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.1
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ)Emotion, behavior: Week 613.8 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 31.1
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ)Emotion, behavior: ET-2.5 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.7
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ)Emotion, behavior: Week 6 [LOCF]7.8 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 29.2
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ)Time impact on parent: Week 611.8 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.1
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ)Time impact on parent: ET1.8 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.7
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ)Time impact on parent: Week 6 [LOCF]8.0 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.1
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ)Emotional impact on parent: Week 610.0 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.3
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ)Emotional impact on parent: ET2.7 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.6
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ)Emotional impact on parent: Week 6 [LOCF]7.4 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.4
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ)Mental health: Week 612.6 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.2
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ)Mental health: ET-0.8 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 12
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ)Mental health: Week 6 [LOCF]7.5 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.4
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ)Physical function: Week 65.9 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.2
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ)Physical function: ET-0.2 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.7
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ)Physical function: Week 6 [LOCF]3.7 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.8
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ)Behavior scale: ET0.6 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.1
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ)Behavior scale: Week 6 [LOCF]5.8 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.4
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ)Self-esteem: Week 69.0 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.9
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ)Self-esteem: ET1.3 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 14
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ)Self-esteem: Week 6 [LOCF]6.4 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.2
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ)General health perception: Week 63.3 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.7
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ)General health perception: ET-0.6 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.8
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ)General health perception: Week 6 [LOCF]1.8 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.5
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ)Family activities: Week 614.6 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.5
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ)Family activities: ET-4.6 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.5
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ)Change in health: Week 60.6 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ)Change in health: Week 6 [LOCF]0.3 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ)Physical health global subscale: Week 62.4 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.8
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ)Physical health global subscale: ET0.1 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.4
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ)Physical health global subscale: Week 6 [LOCF]1.6 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.2
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ)Psychosocial health global subscale: Week 67.7 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 11
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ)Psychosocial health global subscale: ET0.0 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.7
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Children's Global Assessment Scale (CGAS)

CGAS: clinician-rated global assessment item for children based on symptoms and social functioning in home, school, and community settings. Scores on this single item range from 1 to 100 (higher levels indicate greater health) with descriptive anchors for every 10-point interval. Scores above 70 on this scale are considered within the normal range; lower score indicates need for increased supervision.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 2, Week 4, Week 6, Early termination (ET)

Population: ITT; (n)=number of subjects with analyzable data at post-baseline observation for ziprasidone and placebo, respectively. ET includes observations from visits not within windowing criteria. Last observation carried forward \[LOCF\] imputation used for Week 6 LOCF timepoint.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ZiprasidoneChange From Baseline in Children's Global Assessment Scale (CGAS)Week 6 [LOCF] (n=185, 87)8.4 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.8
ZiprasidoneChange From Baseline in Children's Global Assessment Scale (CGAS)Week 2 (n=183, 86)4.7 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.7
ZiprasidoneChange From Baseline in Children's Global Assessment Scale (CGAS)Week 4 (n=155, 63)7.9 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.4
ZiprasidoneChange From Baseline in Children's Global Assessment Scale (CGAS)Week 6 (n=135, 52)10.9 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.8
ZiprasidoneChange From Baseline in Children's Global Assessment Scale (CGAS)ET (n=20, 15)1.3 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.1
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Children's Global Assessment Scale (CGAS)ET (n=20, 15)1.7 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.9
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Children's Global Assessment Scale (CGAS)Week 6 (n=135, 52)10.8 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.9
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Children's Global Assessment Scale (CGAS)Week 2 (n=183, 86)2.6 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.8
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Children's Global Assessment Scale (CGAS)Week 6 [LOCF] (n=185, 87)6.4 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.6
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Children's Global Assessment Scale (CGAS)Week 4 (n=155, 63)6.2 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.9
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Children's Problem Behavior and Aggression Questionnaire (CPBAQ) Total Score

CPBAQ: 19-item parent or legal guardian completed questionnaire to rate the child's verbal (such as yelling or cursing) and physical aggression (such a fighting with peers or being cruel to an animal) during the past week. Behavior was rated on a 4-point scale; range 0 (behavior did not occur or was not a problem) to 3 (behavior occurred a lot or was severe problem). Total score range 0 to 57; higher scores indicate a greater frequency and severity of aggression.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 1 through Week 6

Population: ITT; N=number of subjects with analyzable data at baseline; (n)= number of subjects with analyzable data at post-baseline observation for ziprasidone and placebo, respectively. LOCF imputation used for Week 6 LOCF timepoint.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ZiprasidoneChange From Baseline in Children's Problem Behavior and Aggression Questionnaire (CPBAQ) Total ScoreWeek 1 (n=165, 69)-2.4 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.1
ZiprasidoneChange From Baseline in Children's Problem Behavior and Aggression Questionnaire (CPBAQ) Total ScoreWeek 5 (n=126, 44)-3.1 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 7
ZiprasidoneChange From Baseline in Children's Problem Behavior and Aggression Questionnaire (CPBAQ) Total ScoreWeek 2 (n=161, 71)-2.5 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 8
ZiprasidoneChange From Baseline in Children's Problem Behavior and Aggression Questionnaire (CPBAQ) Total ScoreWeek 6 (n=119, 42)-3.0 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.4
ZiprasidoneChange From Baseline in Children's Problem Behavior and Aggression Questionnaire (CPBAQ) Total ScoreWeek 4 (n=138, 51)-2.7 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.4
ZiprasidoneChange From Baseline in Children's Problem Behavior and Aggression Questionnaire (CPBAQ) Total ScoreWeek 6 [LOCF] (n=167, 71)-2.3 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.2
ZiprasidoneChange From Baseline in Children's Problem Behavior and Aggression Questionnaire (CPBAQ) Total ScoreWeek 3 (n=146, 64)-3.0 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.7
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Children's Problem Behavior and Aggression Questionnaire (CPBAQ) Total ScoreWeek 6 [LOCF] (n=167, 71)-0.3 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.8
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Children's Problem Behavior and Aggression Questionnaire (CPBAQ) Total ScoreWeek 1 (n=165, 69)-1.3 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.8
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Children's Problem Behavior and Aggression Questionnaire (CPBAQ) Total ScoreWeek 2 (n=161, 71)-1.0 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.2
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Children's Problem Behavior and Aggression Questionnaire (CPBAQ) Total ScoreWeek 3 (n=146, 64)-0.7 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.7
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Children's Problem Behavior and Aggression Questionnaire (CPBAQ) Total ScoreWeek 4 (n=138, 51)-1.0 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.5
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Children's Problem Behavior and Aggression Questionnaire (CPBAQ) Total ScoreWeek 5 (n=126, 44)-0.8 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.3
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Children's Problem Behavior and Aggression Questionnaire (CPBAQ) Total ScoreWeek 6 (n=119, 42)-1.9 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.7
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impression of Severity (CGI-S) Score at Week 6

CGI-S: single-item clinician rated scale to rate the severity of a subject's illness over time. Scores range from 1 (normal, not at all ill) to 7 (among the most severely ill subjects); higher score indicates more affected.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 6

Population: ITT; N=number of subjects with analyzable data at post-baseline observation.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
ZiprasidoneChange From Baseline in Clinical Global Impression of Severity (CGI-S) Score at Week 6-1.05 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.08
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Clinical Global Impression of Severity (CGI-S) Score at Week 6-0.84 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.12
Comparison: Difference from placebop-value: 0.128995% CI: [-0.48, 0.06]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in CNS Vital Signs Cognitive Test Battery (Includes Sedation Item): Subscales

A computerized subject-administered test battery with subtests for verbal and visual memory, processing speed, nonverbal reasoning, executive functioning, working memory, and sustained attention. A computerized 7-point sedation item (0 \[not sleepy\] to 10 \[very sleepy\]) was completed prior to test battery. The Neurocognitive index score was derived from subtest scores per an algorithm. The index score and subtest scores assessed the subject's changes in cognition. Scores were rated as above average (score \>109), average (90 to 109), below average (80 to 89), or well below average (70 to 79).

Time frame: Baseline, Week 6, ET

Population: ITT; N=number of subjects with analyzable data at baseline; (n)= number of subjects with analyzable data at post-baseline observation for ziprasidone and placebo, respectively. ET includes observations from visits not within windowing criteria. LOCF imputation used for Week 6 LOCF timepoint (last post-baseline non-missing visit).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ZiprasidoneChange From Baseline in CNS Vital Signs Cognitive Test Battery (Includes Sedation Item): SubscalesSedation: ET (n=23, 26)0.0 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.3
ZiprasidoneChange From Baseline in CNS Vital Signs Cognitive Test Battery (Includes Sedation Item): SubscalesReasoning: Week 6 (n=122, 46)2.2 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 12
ZiprasidoneChange From Baseline in CNS Vital Signs Cognitive Test Battery (Includes Sedation Item): SubscalesVisual Memory: Week 6 (n=124, 46)0.5 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.3
ZiprasidoneChange From Baseline in CNS Vital Signs Cognitive Test Battery (Includes Sedation Item): SubscalesReasoning: ET (n=23, 25)1.3 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.8
ZiprasidoneChange From Baseline in CNS Vital Signs Cognitive Test Battery (Includes Sedation Item): SubscalesVerbal Memory: Week 6 (n=124, 47)1.3 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.1
ZiprasidoneChange From Baseline in CNS Vital Signs Cognitive Test Battery (Includes Sedation Item): SubscalesReasoning: Week 6 [LOCF] (n=145, 70)1.9 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.7
ZiprasidoneChange From Baseline in CNS Vital Signs Cognitive Test Battery (Includes Sedation Item): SubscalesVisual Memory: ET (n=24, 26)-3.8 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.2
ZiprasidoneChange From Baseline in CNS Vital Signs Cognitive Test Battery (Includes Sedation Item): SubscalesExecutive Functioning: Week 6 (n=123, 46)2.9 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.4
ZiprasidoneChange From Baseline in CNS Vital Signs Cognitive Test Battery (Includes Sedation Item): SubscalesSedation: Week 6 (n=124, 47)0.0 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.7
ZiprasidoneChange From Baseline in CNS Vital Signs Cognitive Test Battery (Includes Sedation Item): SubscalesExecutive Functioning: ET (n=23, 26)-6.7 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.1
ZiprasidoneChange From Baseline in CNS Vital Signs Cognitive Test Battery (Includes Sedation Item): SubscalesVisual Memory: Week 6 [LOCF] (n=148, 71)-0.2 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.9
ZiprasidoneChange From Baseline in CNS Vital Signs Cognitive Test Battery (Includes Sedation Item): SubscalesExecutive Functioning: Week 6 [LOCF] (n=146, 71)1.4 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.9
ZiprasidoneChange From Baseline in CNS Vital Signs Cognitive Test Battery (Includes Sedation Item): SubscalesVerbal Memory: ET (n=24, 25)-2.3 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.9
ZiprasidoneChange From Baseline in CNS Vital Signs Cognitive Test Battery (Includes Sedation Item): SubscalesProcessing Speed: Week 6 (n=124, 46)1.3 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.5
ZiprasidoneChange From Baseline in CNS Vital Signs Cognitive Test Battery (Includes Sedation Item): SubscalesWorking Memory: ET (n=23, 24)3.2 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.5
ZiprasidoneChange From Baseline in CNS Vital Signs Cognitive Test Battery (Includes Sedation Item): SubscalesSedation: Week 6 [LOCF] (n=147, 72)0.0 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.8
ZiprasidoneChange From Baseline in CNS Vital Signs Cognitive Test Battery (Includes Sedation Item): SubscalesWorking Memory: Week 6 [LOCF] (n=143, 68)2.0 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.9
ZiprasidoneChange From Baseline in CNS Vital Signs Cognitive Test Battery (Includes Sedation Item): SubscalesProcessing Speed: ET (n=24, 25)-10.6 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 34.5
ZiprasidoneChange From Baseline in CNS Vital Signs Cognitive Test Battery (Includes Sedation Item): SubscalesSustained Attention: Week 6 (n=120, 45)2.0 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.3
ZiprasidoneChange From Baseline in CNS Vital Signs Cognitive Test Battery (Includes Sedation Item): SubscalesVerbal Memory: Week 6 [LOCF] (n=148, 71)0.7 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.4
ZiprasidoneChange From Baseline in CNS Vital Signs Cognitive Test Battery (Includes Sedation Item): SubscalesSustained Attention: ET (n=23, 24)0.5 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.5
ZiprasidoneChange From Baseline in CNS Vital Signs Cognitive Test Battery (Includes Sedation Item): SubscalesProcessing Speed: Week 6 [LOCF] (n=148, 70)-0.6 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.9
ZiprasidoneChange From Baseline in CNS Vital Signs Cognitive Test Battery (Includes Sedation Item): SubscalesSustained Attention: Week 6 [LOCF] (n=143, 68)1.7 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.4
ZiprasidoneChange From Baseline in CNS Vital Signs Cognitive Test Battery (Includes Sedation Item): SubscalesWorking Memory: Week 6 (n=120, 45)1.9 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.9
PlaceboChange From Baseline in CNS Vital Signs Cognitive Test Battery (Includes Sedation Item): SubscalesSustained Attention: Week 6 [LOCF] (n=143, 68)-0.9 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.6
PlaceboChange From Baseline in CNS Vital Signs Cognitive Test Battery (Includes Sedation Item): SubscalesSedation: Week 6 (n=124, 47)-0.4 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.8
PlaceboChange From Baseline in CNS Vital Signs Cognitive Test Battery (Includes Sedation Item): SubscalesSedation: ET (n=23, 26)0.2 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.3
PlaceboChange From Baseline in CNS Vital Signs Cognitive Test Battery (Includes Sedation Item): SubscalesSedation: Week 6 [LOCF] (n=147, 72)-0.2 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.7
PlaceboChange From Baseline in CNS Vital Signs Cognitive Test Battery (Includes Sedation Item): SubscalesVerbal Memory: Week 6 (n=124, 47)0.5 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 14
PlaceboChange From Baseline in CNS Vital Signs Cognitive Test Battery (Includes Sedation Item): SubscalesVerbal Memory: ET (n=24, 25)-2.6 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.1
PlaceboChange From Baseline in CNS Vital Signs Cognitive Test Battery (Includes Sedation Item): SubscalesVerbal Memory: Week 6 [LOCF] (n=148, 71)-0.5 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.4
PlaceboChange From Baseline in CNS Vital Signs Cognitive Test Battery (Includes Sedation Item): SubscalesVisual Memory: Week 6 (n=124, 46)2.0 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.5
PlaceboChange From Baseline in CNS Vital Signs Cognitive Test Battery (Includes Sedation Item): SubscalesVisual Memory: ET (n=24, 26)0.4 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.2
PlaceboChange From Baseline in CNS Vital Signs Cognitive Test Battery (Includes Sedation Item): SubscalesVisual Memory: Week 6 [LOCF] (n=148, 71)1.2 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.3
PlaceboChange From Baseline in CNS Vital Signs Cognitive Test Battery (Includes Sedation Item): SubscalesProcessing Speed: Week 6 (n=124, 46)1.0 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 12
PlaceboChange From Baseline in CNS Vital Signs Cognitive Test Battery (Includes Sedation Item): SubscalesProcessing Speed: ET (n=24, 25)0.5 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.4
PlaceboChange From Baseline in CNS Vital Signs Cognitive Test Battery (Includes Sedation Item): SubscalesProcessing Speed: Week 6 [LOCF] (n=148, 70)0.6 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.1
PlaceboChange From Baseline in CNS Vital Signs Cognitive Test Battery (Includes Sedation Item): SubscalesReasoning: Week 6 (n=122, 46)-0.7 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.6
PlaceboChange From Baseline in CNS Vital Signs Cognitive Test Battery (Includes Sedation Item): SubscalesReasoning: ET (n=23, 25)3.3 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 14
PlaceboChange From Baseline in CNS Vital Signs Cognitive Test Battery (Includes Sedation Item): SubscalesReasoning: Week 6 [LOCF] (n=145, 70)0.7 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.1
PlaceboChange From Baseline in CNS Vital Signs Cognitive Test Battery (Includes Sedation Item): SubscalesExecutive Functioning: Week 6 (n=123, 46)2.7 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.2
PlaceboChange From Baseline in CNS Vital Signs Cognitive Test Battery (Includes Sedation Item): SubscalesExecutive Functioning: ET (n=23, 26)4.6 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.2
PlaceboChange From Baseline in CNS Vital Signs Cognitive Test Battery (Includes Sedation Item): SubscalesExecutive Functioning: Week 6 [LOCF] (n=146, 71)3.2 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.6
PlaceboChange From Baseline in CNS Vital Signs Cognitive Test Battery (Includes Sedation Item): SubscalesWorking Memory: Week 6 (n=120, 45)0.5 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.9
PlaceboChange From Baseline in CNS Vital Signs Cognitive Test Battery (Includes Sedation Item): SubscalesWorking Memory: ET (n=23, 24)3.7 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 11
PlaceboChange From Baseline in CNS Vital Signs Cognitive Test Battery (Includes Sedation Item): SubscalesWorking Memory: Week 6 [LOCF] (n=143, 68)1.3 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.2
PlaceboChange From Baseline in CNS Vital Signs Cognitive Test Battery (Includes Sedation Item): SubscalesSustained Attention: Week 6 (n=120, 45)-1.6 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.1
PlaceboChange From Baseline in CNS Vital Signs Cognitive Test Battery (Includes Sedation Item): SubscalesSustained Attention: ET (n=23, 24)1.5 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.6
Secondary

Change From Baseline in CNS Vital Signs Cognitive Test Battery: Neurocognitive Index

A computerized subject-administered test battery with subtests for verbal and visual memory, processing speed, nonverbal reasoning, executive functioning, working memory, and sustained attention. A computerized 7-point sedation item (0 \[not sleepy\] to 10 \[very sleepy\]) was completed prior to test battery. The Neurocognitive index score was derived from subtest scores per an algorithm. The index score and subtest scores assessed the subject's changes in cognition. Scores were rated as above average (score \>109), average (90 to 109), below average (80 to 89), or well below average (70 to 79).

Time frame: Baseline, Week 6, ET

Population: ITT; N=number of subjects with analyzable data at baseline; (n)= number of subjects with analyzable data at post-baseline observation for ziprasidone and placebo, respectively. ET includes observations from visits not within windowing criteria. LOCF imputation used for Week 6 LOCF timepoint (last post-baseline non-missing visit).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ZiprasidoneChange From Baseline in CNS Vital Signs Cognitive Test Battery: Neurocognitive IndexNeurocognitive Index: Week 6 (n=120, 45)1.8 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.1
ZiprasidoneChange From Baseline in CNS Vital Signs Cognitive Test Battery: Neurocognitive IndexNeurocognitive Index: ET (n=23, 23)-2.7 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.6
ZiprasidoneChange From Baseline in CNS Vital Signs Cognitive Test Battery: Neurocognitive IndexNeurocognitive Index: Week 6 [LOCF] (n=143, 67)1.0 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.4
PlaceboChange From Baseline in CNS Vital Signs Cognitive Test Battery: Neurocognitive IndexNeurocognitive Index: Week 6 (n=120, 45)0.8 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.5
PlaceboChange From Baseline in CNS Vital Signs Cognitive Test Battery: Neurocognitive IndexNeurocognitive Index: ET (n=23, 23)2.2 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.2
PlaceboChange From Baseline in CNS Vital Signs Cognitive Test Battery: Neurocognitive IndexNeurocognitive Index: Week 6 [LOCF] (n=143, 67)1.1 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.4
Comparison: Neurocognitive Index score at Week 6: difference from placebop-value: 0.261395% CI: [-1.01, 3.69]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Movement Disorder Scales: Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) Movement Cluster Score

AIMS: clinician rated 12-item scale to rate 7 body areas and global judgments on the severity of abnormal movements, incapacitation and subject's awareness of abnormal movements. Items 1 to 10 scored 0 (none) to 4 (severe) (total possible score 0 to 40; higher score indicates greater severity); items 11 to 14 are No or Yes response to dental status and sleep movements. Only the sum of the first 7 items to be analyzed (AIMS Movement Cluster score). Total score 0 to 28; higher score indicates greater severity.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 1 through Week 6

Population: ITT; N=number of subjects with analyzable data at baseline; (n)=number of subjects with analyzable data at post-baseline observation for ziprasidone and placebo, respectively. LOCF imputation used for Week 6 LOCF timepoint.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ZiprasidoneChange From Baseline in Movement Disorder Scales: Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) Movement Cluster ScoreWeek 3 (n=166, 74)0.1 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.3
ZiprasidoneChange From Baseline in Movement Disorder Scales: Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) Movement Cluster ScoreWeek 5 (n=142, 54)-0.1 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
ZiprasidoneChange From Baseline in Movement Disorder Scales: Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) Movement Cluster ScoreWeek 2 (n=183, 86)0.1 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.6
ZiprasidoneChange From Baseline in Movement Disorder Scales: Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) Movement Cluster ScoreWeek 6 (n=135, 52)0.0 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.6
ZiprasidoneChange From Baseline in Movement Disorder Scales: Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) Movement Cluster ScoreWeek 4 (n=155, 63)0.1 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.8
ZiprasidoneChange From Baseline in Movement Disorder Scales: Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) Movement Cluster ScoreWeek 6 [LOCF] (n=190, 87)0.0 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.8
ZiprasidoneChange From Baseline in Movement Disorder Scales: Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) Movement Cluster ScoreWeek 1 (n=190, 86)0.2 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.6
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Movement Disorder Scales: Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) Movement Cluster ScoreWeek 6 [LOCF] (n=190, 87)-0.0 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Movement Disorder Scales: Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) Movement Cluster ScoreWeek 1 (n=190, 86)-0.0 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.4
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Movement Disorder Scales: Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) Movement Cluster ScoreWeek 2 (n=183, 86)0.0 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.6
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Movement Disorder Scales: Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) Movement Cluster ScoreWeek 3 (n=166, 74)0.1 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Movement Disorder Scales: Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) Movement Cluster ScoreWeek 4 (n=155, 63)-0.0 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.8
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Movement Disorder Scales: Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) Movement Cluster ScoreWeek 5 (n=142, 54)0.0 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.4
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Movement Disorder Scales: Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) Movement Cluster ScoreWeek 6 (n=135, 52)0.0 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.5
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Movement Disorder Scales: Barnes Akathisia Rating Scale (BAS) Global Clinical Assessment Item

BAS: clinician rated scale to assess akathisia to determine the degree of subjective restlessness and distress associated with restlessness. First 3 items (Objective, Subjective, and Distress related to restlessness) rated on a 4-point scale with range 0 (no symptoms) to 3 (increased severity of symptoms). Item 4 Global Clinical Assessment of Akathisia rated on a 6-point scale range 0 (no symptoms) to 5 (increased severity of symptoms); higher score indicates increased severity. All rating are anchored. Only the Global Clinical Assessment of Akathisia was to be analyzed.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 1 through Week 6

Population: ITT; N=number of subjects with analyzable data at baseline; (n)= number of subjects with analyzable data at post-baseline observation for ziprasidone and placebo, respectively. LOCF imputation used for Week 6 LOCF timepoint.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ZiprasidoneChange From Baseline in Movement Disorder Scales: Barnes Akathisia Rating Scale (BAS) Global Clinical Assessment ItemWeek 2 (n=183, 86)0.1 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
ZiprasidoneChange From Baseline in Movement Disorder Scales: Barnes Akathisia Rating Scale (BAS) Global Clinical Assessment ItemWeek 5 (n=142, 54)0.1 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.5
ZiprasidoneChange From Baseline in Movement Disorder Scales: Barnes Akathisia Rating Scale (BAS) Global Clinical Assessment ItemWeek 1 (n=190, 86)0.1 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.6
ZiprasidoneChange From Baseline in Movement Disorder Scales: Barnes Akathisia Rating Scale (BAS) Global Clinical Assessment ItemWeek 6 (n=135, 52)0.0 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.5
ZiprasidoneChange From Baseline in Movement Disorder Scales: Barnes Akathisia Rating Scale (BAS) Global Clinical Assessment ItemWeek 3 (n=166, 74)0.1 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.6
ZiprasidoneChange From Baseline in Movement Disorder Scales: Barnes Akathisia Rating Scale (BAS) Global Clinical Assessment ItemWeek 6 [LOCF] (n=190, 87)0.0 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.6
ZiprasidoneChange From Baseline in Movement Disorder Scales: Barnes Akathisia Rating Scale (BAS) Global Clinical Assessment ItemWeek 4 (n=155, 63)0.1 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.6
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Movement Disorder Scales: Barnes Akathisia Rating Scale (BAS) Global Clinical Assessment ItemWeek 6 [LOCF] (n=190, 87)0.0 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.2
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Movement Disorder Scales: Barnes Akathisia Rating Scale (BAS) Global Clinical Assessment ItemWeek 1 (n=190, 86)0.1 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.4
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Movement Disorder Scales: Barnes Akathisia Rating Scale (BAS) Global Clinical Assessment ItemWeek 2 (n=183, 86)0.0 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.3
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Movement Disorder Scales: Barnes Akathisia Rating Scale (BAS) Global Clinical Assessment ItemWeek 4 (n=155, 63)-0.0 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.2
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Movement Disorder Scales: Barnes Akathisia Rating Scale (BAS) Global Clinical Assessment ItemWeek 5 (n=142, 54)0.0 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.2
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Movement Disorder Scales: Barnes Akathisia Rating Scale (BAS) Global Clinical Assessment ItemWeek 6 (n=135, 52)0.0 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.2
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Movement Disorder Scales: Barnes Akathisia Rating Scale (BAS) Global Clinical Assessment ItemWeek 3 (n=166, 74)0.0 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.3
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Movement Disorder Scales: Simpson-Angus Rating Scale (SARS)

SARS: 10-item clinician rated instrument to assess parkinsonian symptoms (7 items) and related extrapyramidal side effects (3 items): gait, arm dropping, shoulder shaking, elbow rigidity, leg pendulousness, glabellar tap, tremor, and salivation. Head dropping (modified SARS item 7) substituted for head rotation. Anchored 5-point scale: range 0 (absence of condition, normal) to 4 (most extreme form of condition). Total score is sum of individual item scores (range 0 to 40); higher score indicates more affected.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 1 through Week 6

Population: ITT; N=number of subjects with analyzable data at baseline; (n)= number of subjects with analyzable data at post-baseline observation for ziprasidone and placebo, respectively. LOCF imputation used for Week 6 LOCF timepoint.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ZiprasidoneChange From Baseline in Movement Disorder Scales: Simpson-Angus Rating Scale (SARS)Week 3 (n=165, 74)0.7 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.1
ZiprasidoneChange From Baseline in Movement Disorder Scales: Simpson-Angus Rating Scale (SARS)Week 5 (n=141, 54)0.2 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.4
ZiprasidoneChange From Baseline in Movement Disorder Scales: Simpson-Angus Rating Scale (SARS)Week 2 (n=182, 85)0.5 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.4
ZiprasidoneChange From Baseline in Movement Disorder Scales: Simpson-Angus Rating Scale (SARS)Week 6 (n=134, 52)0.2 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.5
ZiprasidoneChange From Baseline in Movement Disorder Scales: Simpson-Angus Rating Scale (SARS)Week 4 (n=154, 62)0.4 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.6
ZiprasidoneChange From Baseline in Movement Disorder Scales: Simpson-Angus Rating Scale (SARS)Week 6 [LOCF] (n=189, 86)0.3 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.5
ZiprasidoneChange From Baseline in Movement Disorder Scales: Simpson-Angus Rating Scale (SARS)Week 1 (n=189, 85)0.5 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.8
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Movement Disorder Scales: Simpson-Angus Rating Scale (SARS)Week 6 [LOCF] (n=189, 86)-0.1 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.6
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Movement Disorder Scales: Simpson-Angus Rating Scale (SARS)Week 1 (n=189, 85)0.1 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.9
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Movement Disorder Scales: Simpson-Angus Rating Scale (SARS)Week 2 (n=182, 85)-0.0 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.5
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Movement Disorder Scales: Simpson-Angus Rating Scale (SARS)Week 3 (n=165, 74)0.3 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.6
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Movement Disorder Scales: Simpson-Angus Rating Scale (SARS)Week 4 (n=154, 62)-0.0 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.6
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Movement Disorder Scales: Simpson-Angus Rating Scale (SARS)Week 5 (n=141, 54)-0.0 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Movement Disorder Scales: Simpson-Angus Rating Scale (SARS)Week 6 (n=134, 52)-0.2 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.8
Secondary

Change From Baseline in PANSS: Positive and Negative Subscales at Week 6

PANSS: 30-item clinician-rated scale to measure severity of psychopathology (16 items); positive scale (7 items); negative scale (7 items); summarized as positive score, negative score, and total score. Items scored on anchored Likert scale rated 1 (absent symptoms) to 7 (extreme); scores above 1 indicate clinical symptom is present; scores from 2 to 7 indicate increased severity. Total score range 30 to 210: higher score indicates greater severity.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 6

Population: ITT; N=number of subjects with analyzable data at post-baseline observation.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
ZiprasidoneChange From Baseline in PANSS: Positive and Negative Subscales at Week 6Positive score-7.22 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.44
ZiprasidoneChange From Baseline in PANSS: Positive and Negative Subscales at Week 6Negative score-5.51 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.43
PlaceboChange From Baseline in PANSS: Positive and Negative Subscales at Week 6Positive score-5.88 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.56
PlaceboChange From Baseline in PANSS: Positive and Negative Subscales at Week 6Negative score-5.09 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.51
Comparison: Positive score: difference from placebop-value: 0.041295% CI: [-2.61, -0.05]ANCOVA
Comparison: Negative score: difference from placebop-value: 0.466195% CI: [-1.57, 0.72]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) - Total Score at Week 6

PANSS: 30-item clinician-rated scale to measure severity of psychopathology (16 items); positive scale (7 items); negative scale (7 items); summarized as positive score, negative score, and total score. Items scored on anchored Likert scale rated 1 (absent symptoms) to 7 (extreme); scores above 1 indicate clinical symptom is present; scores from 2 to 7 indicate increased severity. Total score range 30 to 210: higher score indicates greater severity.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 6

Population: ITT; N=number of subjects with analyzable data at post-baseline observation.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
ZiprasidoneChange From Baseline in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) - Total Score at Week 6-23.58 scores on a scaleStandard Error 1.42
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) - Total Score at Week 6-21.01 scores on a scaleStandard Error 1.73
Comparison: Total score: difference from placebop-value: 0.198795% CI: [-6.5, 1.36]ANCOVA
Secondary

Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) Score at Week 6

CGI-I: single-item clinician rated scale used to assess the subject's improvement or worsening from baseline. Scores range from 1 (very much improved) to 4 (no change) to 7 (very much worse); higher score indicates more affected.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 6

Population: ITT; N=number of subjects with analyzable data at post-baseline observation.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
ZiprasidoneClinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) Score at Week 62.66 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.09
PlaceboClinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) Score at Week 62.85 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.12
Comparison: Difference from placebop-value: 0.18295% CI: [-0.47, 0.09]ANOVA
Secondary

Number of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: Overall School Performance

School placement questionnaire: parent or legal guardian assessed questionnaire to determine whether the child is currently enrolled in school (or planned to be enrolled if on school holiday like summer break), whether attending regularly if enrolled, and how well the child is doing overall in school. Questions were modified from those used in the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) funded Treatment of Early Onset Schizophrenia Spectrum (TEOSS) study. Results determine whether subjects are currently attending school and qualitatively describe how well they are doing in school.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 2, Week 6, ET

Population: ITT; N=number of subjects analyzable for School Placement Questionnaire; (n)=number of subjects with analyzable data at baseline and post-baseline observation for ziprasidone and placebo, respectively. ET includes observations from visits not within windowing criteria. LOCF imputation used for Week 6 LOCF timepoint.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
ZiprasidoneNumber of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: Overall School PerformanceWeek 2: Excellent (n=60, 26)5 participants
ZiprasidoneNumber of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: Overall School PerformanceET: Good (n=8, 7)0 participants
ZiprasidoneNumber of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: Overall School PerformanceWeek 6 [LOCF]: Very poor (n=68, 28)6 participants
ZiprasidoneNumber of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: Overall School PerformanceBaseline: Good (n=64, 29)10 participants
ZiprasidoneNumber of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: Overall School PerformanceBaseline: Fair (n=64, 29)25 participants
ZiprasidoneNumber of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: Overall School PerformanceBaseline: Poor (n=64, 29)19 participants
ZiprasidoneNumber of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: Overall School PerformanceBaseline: Very poor (n=64, 29)6 participants
ZiprasidoneNumber of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: Overall School PerformanceBaseline: Excellent (n=64, 29)4 participants
ZiprasidoneNumber of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: Overall School PerformanceWeek 2: Good (n=60, 26)12 participants
ZiprasidoneNumber of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: Overall School PerformanceWeek 2: Fair (n=60, 26)20 participants
ZiprasidoneNumber of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: Overall School PerformanceWeek 2: Poor (n=60, 26)17 participants
ZiprasidoneNumber of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: Overall School PerformanceWeek 2: Very poor (n=60, 26)6 participants
ZiprasidoneNumber of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: Overall School PerformanceWeek 6: Excellent (n=52, 21)4 participants
ZiprasidoneNumber of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: Overall School PerformanceWeek 6: Good (n=52, 21)16 participants
ZiprasidoneNumber of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: Overall School PerformanceWeek 6: Fair (n=52, 21)17 participants
ZiprasidoneNumber of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: Overall School PerformanceWeek 6: Poor (n=52, 21)12 participants
ZiprasidoneNumber of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: Overall School PerformanceWeek 6: Very poor (n=52, 21)3 participants
ZiprasidoneNumber of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: Overall School PerformanceET: Excellent (n=8, 7)0 participants
ZiprasidoneNumber of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: Overall School PerformanceET: Fair (n=8, 7)5 participants
ZiprasidoneNumber of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: Overall School PerformanceET: Poor (n=8, 7)2 participants
ZiprasidoneNumber of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: Overall School PerformanceET: Very poor (n=8, 7)1 participants
ZiprasidoneNumber of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: Overall School PerformanceWeek 6 [LOCF]: Excellent (n=68, 28)4 participants
ZiprasidoneNumber of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: Overall School PerformanceWeek 6 [LOCF]: Good (n=68, 28)18 participants
ZiprasidoneNumber of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: Overall School PerformanceWeek 6 [LOCF]: Fair (n=68, 28)24 participants
ZiprasidoneNumber of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: Overall School PerformanceWeek 6 [LOCF]: Poor (n=68, 28)16 participants
PlaceboNumber of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: Overall School PerformanceWeek 6: Good (n=52, 21)8 participants
PlaceboNumber of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: Overall School PerformanceWeek 6 [LOCF]: Poor (n=68, 28)2 participants
PlaceboNumber of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: Overall School PerformanceWeek 6: Fair (n=52, 21)11 participants
PlaceboNumber of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: Overall School PerformanceBaseline: Excellent (n=64, 29)2 participants
PlaceboNumber of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: Overall School PerformanceET: Very poor (n=8, 7)2 participants
PlaceboNumber of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: Overall School PerformanceBaseline: Good (n=64, 29)6 participants
PlaceboNumber of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: Overall School PerformanceWeek 6: Poor (n=52, 21)1 participants
PlaceboNumber of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: Overall School PerformanceBaseline: Fair (n=64, 29)14 participants
PlaceboNumber of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: Overall School PerformanceWeek 6 [LOCF]: Fair (n=68, 28)14 participants
PlaceboNumber of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: Overall School PerformanceBaseline: Poor (n=64, 29)3 participants
PlaceboNumber of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: Overall School PerformanceWeek 6: Very poor (n=52, 21)0 participants
PlaceboNumber of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: Overall School PerformanceBaseline: Very poor (n=64, 29)4 participants
PlaceboNumber of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: Overall School PerformanceWeek 6 [LOCF]: Excellent (n=68, 28)1 participants
PlaceboNumber of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: Overall School PerformanceWeek 2: Excellent (n=60, 26)1 participants
PlaceboNumber of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: Overall School PerformanceET: Excellent (n=8, 7)0 participants
PlaceboNumber of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: Overall School PerformanceWeek 2: Good (n=60, 26)8 participants
PlaceboNumber of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: Overall School PerformanceET: Good (n=8, 7)1 participants
PlaceboNumber of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: Overall School PerformanceWeek 2: Fair (n=60, 26)10 participants
PlaceboNumber of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: Overall School PerformanceWeek 6 [LOCF]: Very poor (n=68, 28)2 participants
PlaceboNumber of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: Overall School PerformanceWeek 2: Poor (n=60, 26)5 participants
PlaceboNumber of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: Overall School PerformanceET: Fair (n=8, 7)3 participants
PlaceboNumber of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: Overall School PerformanceWeek 2: Very poor (n=60, 26)2 participants
PlaceboNumber of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: Overall School PerformanceWeek 6 [LOCF]: Good (n=68, 28)9 participants
PlaceboNumber of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: Overall School PerformanceWeek 6: Excellent (n=52, 21)1 participants
PlaceboNumber of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: Overall School PerformanceET: Poor (n=8, 7)1 participants
Secondary

Number of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School Attendance

School placement questionnaire: parent or legal guardian assessed questionnaire to determine whether the child is currently enrolled in school (or planned to be enrolled if on school holiday like summer break), whether attending regularly if enrolled, and how well the child is doing overall in school. Questions were modified from those used in the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) funded Treatment of Early Onset Schizophrenia Spectrum (TEOSS) study. Results determine whether subjects are currently attending school and qualitatively describe how well they are doing in school.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 2, Week 6, ET

Population: ITT; N=number of subjects analyzable for School Placement Questionnaire; (n)=number of subjects with analyzable data at baseline and post-baseline observation for ziprasidone and placebo, respectively. ET includes observations from visits not within windowing criteria. LOCF imputation used for Week 6 LOCF timepoint.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
ZiprasidoneNumber of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School AttendanceBaseline: Only a few absences (n=88, 42)16 participants
ZiprasidoneNumber of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School AttendanceWeek 6: Did not attend (n=67, 24)13 participants
ZiprasidoneNumber of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School AttendanceWeek 2: Only a few absences (n=82, 36)14 participants
ZiprasidoneNumber of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School AttendanceWeek 6: Not applicable or vacation (n=67, 24)11 participants
ZiprasidoneNumber of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School AttendanceBaseline: Did not attend (n=88, 42)26 participants
ZiprasidoneNumber of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School AttendanceET: No absences (n=12, 12)1 participants
ZiprasidoneNumber of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School AttendanceWeek 2: Frequent absences (n=82, 36)11 participants
ZiprasidoneNumber of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School AttendanceET: Only a few absences (n=12, 12)4 participants
ZiprasidoneNumber of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School AttendanceBaseline: No absences (n=88, 42)20 participants
ZiprasidoneNumber of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School AttendanceET: Frequent absences (n=12, 12)2 participants
ZiprasidoneNumber of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School AttendanceWeek 2: Did not attend (n=82, 36)25 participants
ZiprasidoneNumber of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School AttendanceET: Did not attend (n=12, 12)4 participants
ZiprasidoneNumber of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School AttendanceBaseline: Not applicable or vacation (n=88, 42)13 participants
ZiprasidoneNumber of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School AttendanceET: Not applicable or vacation (n=12, 12)1 participants
ZiprasidoneNumber of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School AttendanceWeek 2: Not applicable or vacation (n=82, 36)13 participants
ZiprasidoneNumber of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School AttendanceWeek 6 [LOCF]: No absences (n=89, 37)18 participants
ZiprasidoneNumber of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School AttendanceBaseline: Frequent absences (n=88, 42)13 participants
ZiprasidoneNumber of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School AttendanceWeek 6 [LOCF]: Only a few absences (n=89, 37)26 participants
ZiprasidoneNumber of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School AttendanceWeek 6: No absences (n=67, 24)16 participants
ZiprasidoneNumber of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School AttendanceWeek 6 [LOCF]: Frequent absences (n=89, 37)11 participants
ZiprasidoneNumber of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School AttendanceWeek 2: No absences (n=82, 36)19 participants
ZiprasidoneNumber of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School AttendanceWeek 6 [LOCF]: Did not attend (n=89, 37)21 participants
ZiprasidoneNumber of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School AttendanceWeek 6: Frequent absences (n=67, 24)5 participants
ZiprasidoneNumber of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School AttendanceWeek 6[LOCF]: Not applicable or vacation(n=89,37)13 participants
ZiprasidoneNumber of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School AttendanceWeek 6: Only a few absences (n=67, 24)22 participants
PlaceboNumber of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School AttendanceWeek 6[LOCF]: Not applicable or vacation(n=89,37)8 participants
PlaceboNumber of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School AttendanceWeek 6: Only a few absences (n=67, 24)12 participants
PlaceboNumber of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School AttendanceBaseline: No absences (n=88, 42)7 participants
PlaceboNumber of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School AttendanceBaseline: Only a few absences (n=88, 42)15 participants
PlaceboNumber of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School AttendanceBaseline: Frequent absences (n=88, 42)2 participants
PlaceboNumber of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School AttendanceBaseline: Did not attend (n=88, 42)7 participants
PlaceboNumber of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School AttendanceBaseline: Not applicable or vacation (n=88, 42)11 participants
PlaceboNumber of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School AttendanceWeek 2: No absences (n=82, 36)8 participants
PlaceboNumber of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School AttendanceWeek 2: Only a few absences (n=82, 36)9 participants
PlaceboNumber of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School AttendanceWeek 2: Frequent absences (n=82, 36)4 participants
PlaceboNumber of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School AttendanceWeek 2: Did not attend (n=82, 36)8 participants
PlaceboNumber of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School AttendanceWeek 2: Not applicable or vacation (n=82, 36)7 participants
PlaceboNumber of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School AttendanceWeek 6: No absences (n=67, 24)8 participants
PlaceboNumber of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School AttendanceWeek 6: Frequent absences (n=67, 24)0 participants
PlaceboNumber of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School AttendanceWeek 6: Did not attend (n=67, 24)0 participants
PlaceboNumber of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School AttendanceWeek 6: Not applicable or vacation (n=67, 24)4 participants
PlaceboNumber of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School AttendanceET: No absences (n=12, 12)0 participants
PlaceboNumber of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School AttendanceET: Only a few absences (n=12, 12)0 participants
PlaceboNumber of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School AttendanceET: Frequent absences (n=12, 12)5 participants
PlaceboNumber of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School AttendanceET: Did not attend (n=12, 12)4 participants
PlaceboNumber of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School AttendanceET: Not applicable or vacation (n=12, 12)3 participants
PlaceboNumber of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School AttendanceWeek 6 [LOCF]: No absences (n=89, 37)8 participants
PlaceboNumber of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School AttendanceWeek 6 [LOCF]: Only a few absences (n=89, 37)13 participants
PlaceboNumber of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School AttendanceWeek 6 [LOCF]: Frequent absences (n=89, 37)4 participants
PlaceboNumber of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School AttendanceWeek 6 [LOCF]: Did not attend (n=89, 37)4 participants
Secondary

Number of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School Situation

School placement questionnaire: parent or legal guardian assessed questionnaire to determine whether the child is currently enrolled in school (or planned to be enrolled if on school holiday like summer break), whether attending regularly if enrolled, and how well the child is doing overall in school. Questions were modified from those used in the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) funded Treatment of Early Onset Schizophrenia Spectrum (TEOSS) study. Results determine whether subjects are currently attending school and qualitatively describe how well they are doing in school.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 2, Week 6, ET

Population: ITT; N=number of subjects analyzable for School Placement Questionnaire; (n)=number of subjects with analyzable data at baseline and post-baseline observation for ziprasidone and placebo, respectively. ET includes observations from visits not within windowing criteria. LOCF imputation used for Week 6 LOCF timepoint.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
ZiprasidoneNumber of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School SituationBaseline: Not enrolled or other (n=185, 85)25 participants
ZiprasidoneNumber of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School SituationWeek 2: Enrolled or attend (n=179, 84)38 participants
ZiprasidoneNumber of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School SituationWeek 6 [LOCF]: Not enrolled or other (n=183, 86)26 participants
ZiprasidoneNumber of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School SituationBaseline: Enrolled or attend (n=185, 85)40 participants
ZiprasidoneNumber of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School SituationBaseline: Not attend or mental illness (n=185, 85)62 participants
ZiprasidoneNumber of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School SituationBaseline: Not attend or other (n=185, 85)2 participants
ZiprasidoneNumber of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School SituationBaseline: Enrolled or vacation (n=185, 85)20 participants
ZiprasidoneNumber of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School SituationBaseline: Not enrolled or mental illness36 participants
ZiprasidoneNumber of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School SituationWeek 2: Not attend or mental illness (n=179, 84)59 participants
ZiprasidoneNumber of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School SituationWeek 2: Not attend or other (n=179, 84)3 participants
ZiprasidoneNumber of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School SituationWeek 2: Enrolled or vacation (n=179, 84)20 participants
ZiprasidoneNumber of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School SituationWeek 2: Not enrolled or mental illness (n=179, 84)36 participants
ZiprasidoneNumber of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School SituationWeek 2: Not enrolled or other (n=179, 84)23 participants
ZiprasidoneNumber of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School SituationWeek 6: Enrolled or attend (n=134, 51)38 participants
ZiprasidoneNumber of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School SituationWeek 6: Not attend or mental illness (n=134, 51)36 participants
ZiprasidoneNumber of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School SituationWeek 6: Not attend or other (n=134, 51)3 participants
ZiprasidoneNumber of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School SituationWeek 6: Enrolled or vacation (n=134, 51)14 participants
ZiprasidoneNumber of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School SituationWeek 6: Not enrolled or mental illness (n=134, 51)23 participants
ZiprasidoneNumber of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School SituationWeek 6: Not enrolled or other (n=134, 51)20 participants
ZiprasidoneNumber of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School SituationET: Enrolled or attend (n=32, 25)5 participants
ZiprasidoneNumber of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School SituationET: Not attend or mental illness (n=32, 25)8 participants
ZiprasidoneNumber of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School SituationET: Not attend or other (n=32, 25)0 participants
ZiprasidoneNumber of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School SituationET: Enrolled or vacation (n=32, 25)5 participants
ZiprasidoneNumber of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School SituationET: Not enrolled or mental illness (n=32, 25)10 participants
ZiprasidoneNumber of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School SituationET: Not enrolled or other (n=32, 25)4 participants
ZiprasidoneNumber of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School SituationWeek 6 [LOCF]: Enrolled or attend (n=183, 86)47 participants
ZiprasidoneNumber of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School SituationWeek 6 [LOCF]: Not attend or mental illness50 participants
ZiprasidoneNumber of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School SituationWeek 6 [LOCF]: Not attend or other (n=183, 86)3 participants
ZiprasidoneNumber of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School SituationWeek 6 [LOCF]: Enrolled or vacation (n=183, 86)21 participants
ZiprasidoneNumber of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School SituationWeek 6 [LOCF]: Not enrolled or mental illness36 participants
PlaceboNumber of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School SituationWeek 6: Not attend or mental illness (n=134, 51)7 participants
PlaceboNumber of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School SituationET: Enrolled or vacation (n=32, 25)4 participants
PlaceboNumber of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School SituationET: Not attend or mental illness (n=32, 25)14 participants
PlaceboNumber of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School SituationWeek 6 [LOCF]: Not attend or mental illness86 participants
PlaceboNumber of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School SituationWeek 6: Not attend or other (n=134, 51)0 participants
PlaceboNumber of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School SituationWeek 6 [LOCF]: Not enrolled or other (n=183, 86)12 participants
PlaceboNumber of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School SituationBaseline: Enrolled or attend (n=185, 85)15 participants
PlaceboNumber of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School SituationWeek 6: Enrolled or vacation (n=134, 51)5 participants
PlaceboNumber of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School SituationBaseline: Not attend or mental illness (n=185, 85)26 participants
PlaceboNumber of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School SituationET: Not enrolled or mental illness (n=32, 25)3 participants
PlaceboNumber of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School SituationBaseline: Not attend or other (n=185, 85)0 participants
PlaceboNumber of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School SituationWeek 6: Not enrolled or mental illness (n=134, 51)11 participants
PlaceboNumber of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School SituationBaseline: Enrolled or vacation (n=185, 85)19 participants
PlaceboNumber of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School SituationWeek 6 [LOCF]: Not attend or other (n=183, 86)1 participants
PlaceboNumber of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School SituationBaseline: Not enrolled or mental illness12 participants
PlaceboNumber of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School SituationBaseline: Not enrolled or other (n=185, 85)13 participants
PlaceboNumber of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School SituationWeek 2: Enrolled or attend (n=179, 84)20 participants
PlaceboNumber of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School SituationWeek 6: Not enrolled or other (n=134, 51)10 participants
PlaceboNumber of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School SituationWeek 2: Not attend or mental illness (n=179, 84)24 participants
PlaceboNumber of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School SituationET: Not enrolled or other (n=32, 25)1 participants
PlaceboNumber of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School SituationWeek 2: Not attend or other (n=179, 84)2 participants
PlaceboNumber of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School SituationET: Enrolled or attend (n=32, 25)3 participants
PlaceboNumber of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School SituationWeek 2: Enrolled or vacation (n=179, 84)11 participants
PlaceboNumber of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School SituationWeek 6 [LOCF]: Not enrolled or mental illness17 participants
PlaceboNumber of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School SituationWeek 2: Not enrolled or mental illness (n=179, 84)15 participants
PlaceboNumber of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School SituationWeek 6 [LOCF]: Enrolled or attend (n=183, 86)23 participants
PlaceboNumber of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School SituationWeek 2: Not enrolled or other (n=179, 84)12 participants
PlaceboNumber of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School SituationET: Not attend or other (n=32, 25)0 participants
PlaceboNumber of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School SituationWeek 6: Enrolled or attend (n=134, 51)18 participants
PlaceboNumber of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School SituationWeek 6 [LOCF]: Enrolled or vacation (n=183, 86)10 participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 10, 2026