Schizophrenia
Conditions
Keywords
Adolescent Subjects With Schizophrenia
Brief summary
The purpose of this study is to determine if flexibly-dosed ziprasidone is safe and effective for the treatment of adolescents (ages 13-17) with schizophrenia
Detailed description
Termination Reason: On March 24, 2009, Pfizer Inc. stopped late stage Geodon pediatric clinical trials in schizophrenia (A1281134 - placebo controlled; A1281135 - open label). As recommended by the DSMB, these studies were stopped due to lack of efficacy. No safety concerns were identified.
Interventions
Placebo matching the oral ziprasidone capsules of 20 mg, 40 mg, 60 mg, and 80 mg strength or matching placebo. Subjects will be dosed daily for 6 weeks using a flexible dose design with a minimal dose range of 40mg twice a day (BID) to a maximum dose range of 80 mg BID. For subjects weighing \<45 kg, the doses will range from 20 mg BID to 40 mg BID.
Oral ziprasidone capsules of 20 mg, 40 mg, 60 mg, and 80 mg strength or matching placebo. Subjects will be dosed daily for 6 weeks using a flexible dose design with a minimal dose range of 40mg BID to a maximum dose range of 80 mg BID. For subjects weighing \<45 kg, the doses will range from 20 mg BID to 40 mg BID.
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th Edition (DSM-IV) criteria for schizophrenia: Current symptoms were to be present for at least 7 days before screening. * At the Screening and Baseline visits, subjects must have had a Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale - Anchored score ≥35 and a score of ≥4 on at least 1 of the following items: unusual thought content (i.e., delusions), hallucinations, suspiciousness, or conceptual disorganization. * Age 13 - 17 years
Exclusion criteria
* Imminent risk of suicide or homicide, as judged by the site investigator * Any history of serious or unstable medical illness, including risk for QT prolongation
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change From Baseline in Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale - Anchored (BPRS-A) Total Score at Week 6 | Baseline, Week 6 | BPRS-A: 18-item clinician rated scale to assess somatic concern, anxiety, emotional withdrawal, disorganization, hallucinatory behavior, guilt feelings, suspiciousness, disorientation, tension, mannerisms, posturing, grandiosity, depressive mood, hostility, motor retardation, uncooperativeness, unusual thought content, blunted affect, and excitement. Ratings anchored to improve consistency for a single rater over time or between raters. Items rated on 7-point scale 0 (not present) to 6 (extremely severe). Total score=sum of items (range 0 to 108); higher scores indicate increased pathology. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change From Baseline in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) - Total Score at Week 6 | Baseline, Week 6 | PANSS: 30-item clinician-rated scale to measure severity of psychopathology (16 items); positive scale (7 items); negative scale (7 items); summarized as positive score, negative score, and total score. Items scored on anchored Likert scale rated 1 (absent symptoms) to 7 (extreme); scores above 1 indicate clinical symptom is present; scores from 2 to 7 indicate increased severity. Total score range 30 to 210: higher score indicates greater severity. |
| Change From Baseline in PANSS: Positive and Negative Subscales at Week 6 | Baseline, Week 6 | PANSS: 30-item clinician-rated scale to measure severity of psychopathology (16 items); positive scale (7 items); negative scale (7 items); summarized as positive score, negative score, and total score. Items scored on anchored Likert scale rated 1 (absent symptoms) to 7 (extreme); scores above 1 indicate clinical symptom is present; scores from 2 to 7 indicate increased severity. Total score range 30 to 210: higher score indicates greater severity. |
| Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) Score at Week 6 | Baseline, Week 6 | CGI-I: single-item clinician rated scale used to assess the subject's improvement or worsening from baseline. Scores range from 1 (very much improved) to 4 (no change) to 7 (very much worse); higher score indicates more affected. |
| Change From Baseline in Children's Global Assessment Scale (CGAS) | Baseline, Week 2, Week 4, Week 6, Early termination (ET) | CGAS: clinician-rated global assessment item for children based on symptoms and social functioning in home, school, and community settings. Scores on this single item range from 1 to 100 (higher levels indicate greater health) with descriptive anchors for every 10-point interval. Scores above 70 on this scale are considered within the normal range; lower score indicates need for increased supervision. |
| Change From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ) | Baseline, Week 6, ET | CHQ: 50-item, 15 subscale parent or legal guardian assessed instrument of child's physical, emotional, social well-being, and relative burden of disease on the parents; rated on Likert-type scale: range 0 to 100; higher scores indicate a more positive health status. Global indicators for Physical Health and Psychosocial Health are weighted composites derived from subscale items using scoring algorithms (transformed scores); range 0 to 100: higher scores indicate more positive health status. |
| Change From Baseline in Children's Problem Behavior and Aggression Questionnaire (CPBAQ) Total Score | Baseline, Week 1 through Week 6 | CPBAQ: 19-item parent or legal guardian completed questionnaire to rate the child's verbal (such as yelling or cursing) and physical aggression (such a fighting with peers or being cruel to an animal) during the past week. Behavior was rated on a 4-point scale; range 0 (behavior did not occur or was not a problem) to 3 (behavior occurred a lot or was severe problem). Total score range 0 to 57; higher scores indicate a greater frequency and severity of aggression. |
| Change From Baseline in Child Depression Rating Scale - Revised (CDRS-R): Total Score | Baseline, Week 1 through Week 6 | CDRS-R: clinician-rated interview-based scale (with both child and parent or guardian) to assess 17 distinct symptom areas to derive an index of depression severity. Discrepancies between informants' responses were resolved by using most impaired rating given by valid informant. Rated on a 7-point scale; range from 1 (no impairment) to 7 (indicates greater impairment). Total score calculated as sum of the 17 items (range 1 to 119); higher score indicates greater impairment. |
| Change From Baseline in Child Depression Rating Scale - Revised (CDRS-R): Suicide Ideation Item 13 | Baseline, Week 1 through Week 6 | CDRS-R: clinician-rated interview-based scale (with both child and parent or guardian) to assess 17 distinct symptom areas to derive an index of depression severity. Discrepancies between informants' responses were resolved by using most impaired rating given by valid informant. Suicide Ideation (Item 13) detects changes in suicidality over time. Rated on a 7-point scale; range from 1 (no impairment) to 7 (indicates greater impairment). |
| Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impression of Severity (CGI-S) Score at Week 6 | Baseline, Week 6 | CGI-S: single-item clinician rated scale to rate the severity of a subject's illness over time. Scores range from 1 (normal, not at all ill) to 7 (among the most severely ill subjects); higher score indicates more affected. |
| Change From Baseline in CNS Vital Signs Cognitive Test Battery (Includes Sedation Item): Subscales | Baseline, Week 6, ET | A computerized subject-administered test battery with subtests for verbal and visual memory, processing speed, nonverbal reasoning, executive functioning, working memory, and sustained attention. A computerized 7-point sedation item (0 \[not sleepy\] to 10 \[very sleepy\]) was completed prior to test battery. The Neurocognitive index score was derived from subtest scores per an algorithm. The index score and subtest scores assessed the subject's changes in cognition. Scores were rated as above average (score \>109), average (90 to 109), below average (80 to 89), or well below average (70 to 79). |
| Change From Baseline in CNS Vital Signs Cognitive Test Battery: Neurocognitive Index | Baseline, Week 6, ET | A computerized subject-administered test battery with subtests for verbal and visual memory, processing speed, nonverbal reasoning, executive functioning, working memory, and sustained attention. A computerized 7-point sedation item (0 \[not sleepy\] to 10 \[very sleepy\]) was completed prior to test battery. The Neurocognitive index score was derived from subtest scores per an algorithm. The index score and subtest scores assessed the subject's changes in cognition. Scores were rated as above average (score \>109), average (90 to 109), below average (80 to 89), or well below average (70 to 79). |
| Change From Baseline in Movement Disorder Scales: Simpson-Angus Rating Scale (SARS) | Baseline, Week 1 through Week 6 | SARS: 10-item clinician rated instrument to assess parkinsonian symptoms (7 items) and related extrapyramidal side effects (3 items): gait, arm dropping, shoulder shaking, elbow rigidity, leg pendulousness, glabellar tap, tremor, and salivation. Head dropping (modified SARS item 7) substituted for head rotation. Anchored 5-point scale: range 0 (absence of condition, normal) to 4 (most extreme form of condition). Total score is sum of individual item scores (range 0 to 40); higher score indicates more affected. |
| Change From Baseline in Movement Disorder Scales: Barnes Akathisia Rating Scale (BAS) Global Clinical Assessment Item | Baseline, Week 1 through Week 6 | BAS: clinician rated scale to assess akathisia to determine the degree of subjective restlessness and distress associated with restlessness. First 3 items (Objective, Subjective, and Distress related to restlessness) rated on a 4-point scale with range 0 (no symptoms) to 3 (increased severity of symptoms). Item 4 Global Clinical Assessment of Akathisia rated on a 6-point scale range 0 (no symptoms) to 5 (increased severity of symptoms); higher score indicates increased severity. All rating are anchored. Only the Global Clinical Assessment of Akathisia was to be analyzed. |
| Change From Baseline in Movement Disorder Scales: Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) Movement Cluster Score | Baseline, Week 1 through Week 6 | AIMS: clinician rated 12-item scale to rate 7 body areas and global judgments on the severity of abnormal movements, incapacitation and subject's awareness of abnormal movements. Items 1 to 10 scored 0 (none) to 4 (severe) (total possible score 0 to 40; higher score indicates greater severity); items 11 to 14 are No or Yes response to dental status and sleep movements. Only the sum of the first 7 items to be analyzed (AIMS Movement Cluster score). Total score 0 to 28; higher score indicates greater severity. |
| Number of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School Situation | Baseline, Week 2, Week 6, ET | School placement questionnaire: parent or legal guardian assessed questionnaire to determine whether the child is currently enrolled in school (or planned to be enrolled if on school holiday like summer break), whether attending regularly if enrolled, and how well the child is doing overall in school. Questions were modified from those used in the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) funded Treatment of Early Onset Schizophrenia Spectrum (TEOSS) study. Results determine whether subjects are currently attending school and qualitatively describe how well they are doing in school. |
| Number of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School Attendance | Baseline, Week 2, Week 6, ET | School placement questionnaire: parent or legal guardian assessed questionnaire to determine whether the child is currently enrolled in school (or planned to be enrolled if on school holiday like summer break), whether attending regularly if enrolled, and how well the child is doing overall in school. Questions were modified from those used in the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) funded Treatment of Early Onset Schizophrenia Spectrum (TEOSS) study. Results determine whether subjects are currently attending school and qualitatively describe how well they are doing in school. |
| Number of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: Overall School Performance | Baseline, Week 2, Week 6, ET | School placement questionnaire: parent or legal guardian assessed questionnaire to determine whether the child is currently enrolled in school (or planned to be enrolled if on school holiday like summer break), whether attending regularly if enrolled, and how well the child is doing overall in school. Questions were modified from those used in the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) funded Treatment of Early Onset Schizophrenia Spectrum (TEOSS) study. Results determine whether subjects are currently attending school and qualitatively describe how well they are doing in school. |
| Change From Baseline in Child Depression Rating Scale - Revised (CDRS-R): Impaired Schoolwork Item 1 | Baseline, Week 2, Week 6 | Clinician-rated interview-based scale (with both child and parent or guardian) to assess 17 distinct symptom areas to derive an index of depression severity. Discrepancies between informants' responses resolved by using most impaired rating given by valid informant. Impaired Schoolwork (Item 1) assesses school function for the subgroup of subjects reported to be in school. Rated on a 7-point scale; range from 1 (no impairment) to 7 (indicates greater impairment). |
Countries
Colombia, Costa Rica, India, Malaysia, Peru, Russia, Singapore, Ukraine, United States
Participant flow
Recruitment details
A planned interim analysis resulted in recommendation from Data Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB) to terminate study due to futility per the interim analysis charter (p-value = 0.9840). Only one active subject in the study was affected by this decision.
Pre-assignment details
Screening visit followed by a 1 to 10 day period to allow for wash-out of exclusionary medications.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Ziprasidone Oral (PO) capsules administered twice daily (BID) with meals; titrated from a starting dose of 20 milligrams per day (mg/day) over 2 weeks with dose increases of 20 mg/day every second day up to a target dose range of 120 to 160 mg/day for subjects with body weight ≥ 45 kilograms (kg); target dose for subjects with body weight \< 45 kg is 60 to 80 mg/day. After titration dose is attained, flexible dosing range of 80 to 160 (if body weight ≥ 45 kg) or 40 to 80 mg/day (if body weight \< 45 kg) for duration of the study. | 193 |
| Placebo Placebo matching ziprasidone administration: PO capsules administered BID) with meals; titrated from a starting dose of 20 mg/day over 2 weeks with dose increases of 20 mg/day every second day up to a target dose range of 120 to 160 mg/day for subjects with body weight ≥ 45 kg; target dose for subjects with body weight \< 45 kg is 60 to 80 mg/day. After titration dose is attained, flexible dosing range of 80 to 160 (if body weight ≥ 45 kg) or 40 to 80 mg/day (if body weight \< 45 kg) for duration of the study. | 90 |
| Total | 283 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Adverse Event | 21 | 10 |
| Overall Study | Insufficient clinical response | 18 | 18 |
| Overall Study | Laboratory abnormality | 1 | 1 |
| Overall Study | Lost to Follow-up | 3 | 3 |
| Overall Study | Miscellaneous | 0 | 4 |
| Overall Study | Randomized but not treated | 0 | 1 |
| Overall Study | Study terminated by sponsor | 1 | 0 |
| Overall Study | Withdrawal by Subject | 14 | 2 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Ziprasidone | Total | Placebo |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 15.3 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.4 | 15.3 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.4 | 15.4 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.4 |
| Age, Customized >12 years and <13 years at start of treatment | 4 participants | 4 participants | 0 participants |
| Age, Customized Between 13 and 17 years | 189 participants | 279 participants | 90 participants |
| Ethnicity Hispanic / Latino | 21 participants | 30 participants | 9 participants |
| Ethnicity Not Hispanic / Latino | 172 participants | 253 participants | 81 participants |
| Height | 164.9 centimeters (cm) STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.1 | 165.8 centimeters (cm) STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.1 | 167.8 centimeters (cm) STANDARD_DEVIATION 10 |
| Race Asian | 38 particpants | 55 particpants | 17 particpants |
| Race Black | 17 particpants | 19 particpants | 2 particpants |
| Race Hispanic | 9 particpants | 12 particpants | 3 particpants |
| Race Other | 13 particpants | 21 particpants | 8 particpants |
| Race White | 116 particpants | 176 particpants | 60 particpants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 84 Participants | 112 Participants | 28 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 109 Participants | 171 Participants | 62 Participants |
| Tanner adolescent pubertal self-assessment: Breast (females) Missing (not answered) | 2 particpants | 2 particpants | 0 particpants |
| Tanner adolescent pubertal self-assessment: Breast (females) Not applicable | 109 particpants | 171 particpants | 62 particpants |
| Tanner adolescent pubertal self-assessment: Breast (females) Stage 1 | 0 particpants | 1 particpants | 1 particpants |
| Tanner adolescent pubertal self-assessment: Breast (females) Stage 2 | 6 particpants | 9 particpants | 3 particpants |
| Tanner adolescent pubertal self-assessment: Breast (females) Stage 3 | 16 particpants | 20 particpants | 4 particpants |
| Tanner adolescent pubertal self-assessment: Breast (females) Stage 4 | 35 particpants | 46 particpants | 11 particpants |
| Tanner adolescent pubertal self-assessment: Breast (females) Stage 5 | 25 particpants | 34 particpants | 9 particpants |
| Tanner adolescent pubertal self-assessment: Genitalia (males) Missing (not answered) | 2 participants | 2 participants | 0 participants |
| Tanner adolescent pubertal self-assessment: Genitalia (males) Not applicable | 82 participants | 110 participants | 28 participants |
| Tanner adolescent pubertal self-assessment: Genitalia (males) Stage 1 | 0 participants | 1 participants | 1 participants |
| Tanner adolescent pubertal self-assessment: Genitalia (males) Stage 2 | 9 participants | 12 participants | 3 participants |
| Tanner adolescent pubertal self-assessment: Genitalia (males) Stage 3 | 25 participants | 41 participants | 16 participants |
| Tanner adolescent pubertal self-assessment: Genitalia (males) Stage 4 | 57 participants | 83 participants | 26 participants |
| Tanner adolescent pubertal self-assessment: Genitalia (males) Stage 5 | 18 participants | 34 participants | 16 participants |
| Tanner adolescent pubertal self-assessment: Pubic hair (females and males) Missing (not answered) | 2 participants | 2 participants | 0 participants |
| Tanner adolescent pubertal self-assessment: Pubic hair (females and males) Stage 1 | 0 participants | 3 participants | 3 participants |
| Tanner adolescent pubertal self-assessment: Pubic hair (females and males) Stage 2 | 13 participants | 20 participants | 7 participants |
| Tanner adolescent pubertal self-assessment: Pubic hair (females and males) Stage 3 | 36 participants | 49 participants | 13 participants |
| Tanner adolescent pubertal self-assessment: Pubic hair (females and males) Stage 4 | 90 participants | 133 participants | 43 participants |
| Tanner adolescent pubertal self-assessment: Pubic hair (females and males) Stage 5 | 52 participants | 76 participants | 24 participants |
| Weight | 61.2 kilograms (kg) STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.5 | 62.2 kilograms (kg) STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.6 | 64.3 kilograms (kg) STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.7 |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | — / — | — / — |
| other Total, other adverse events | 110 / 193 | 27 / 90 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 9 / 193 | 1 / 90 |
Outcome results
Change From Baseline in Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale - Anchored (BPRS-A) Total Score at Week 6
BPRS-A: 18-item clinician rated scale to assess somatic concern, anxiety, emotional withdrawal, disorganization, hallucinatory behavior, guilt feelings, suspiciousness, disorientation, tension, mannerisms, posturing, grandiosity, depressive mood, hostility, motor retardation, uncooperativeness, unusual thought content, blunted affect, and excitement. Ratings anchored to improve consistency for a single rater over time or between raters. Items rated on 7-point scale 0 (not present) to 6 (extremely severe). Total score=sum of items (range 0 to 108); higher scores indicate increased pathology.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 6
Population: Intent to treat (ITT): all randomized subjects who had baseline measurements, took at least 1 dose of study medication, and had at least 1 post-baseline visit. N=number of subjects with analyzable data at post-baseline observation.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ziprasidone | Change From Baseline in Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale - Anchored (BPRS-A) Total Score at Week 6 | -14.16 scores on a scale | Standard Error 0.78 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale - Anchored (BPRS-A) Total Score at Week 6 | -12.35 scores on a scale | Standard Error 1.05 |
Change From Baseline in Child Depression Rating Scale - Revised (CDRS-R): Impaired Schoolwork Item 1
Clinician-rated interview-based scale (with both child and parent or guardian) to assess 17 distinct symptom areas to derive an index of depression severity. Discrepancies between informants' responses resolved by using most impaired rating given by valid informant. Impaired Schoolwork (Item 1) assesses school function for the subgroup of subjects reported to be in school. Rated on a 7-point scale; range from 1 (no impairment) to 7 (indicates greater impairment).
Time frame: Baseline, Week 2, Week 6
Population: ITT; N=number of subjects with analyzable data at baseline; (n)=number of subjects with analyzable data at post-baseline observation for ziprasidone and placebo, respectively. LOCF imputation used for Week 6 LOCF timepoint.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ziprasidone | Change From Baseline in Child Depression Rating Scale - Revised (CDRS-R): Impaired Schoolwork Item 1 | Week 2 (n=38, 15) | -0.3 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.9 |
| Ziprasidone | Change From Baseline in Child Depression Rating Scale - Revised (CDRS-R): Impaired Schoolwork Item 1 | Week 6 (n=30, 8) | -0.6 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.1 |
| Ziprasidone | Change From Baseline in Child Depression Rating Scale - Revised (CDRS-R): Impaired Schoolwork Item 1 | Week 6 [LOCF] (n=39, 15) | -0.6 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 1 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Child Depression Rating Scale - Revised (CDRS-R): Impaired Schoolwork Item 1 | Week 2 (n=38, 15) | -0.2 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.7 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Child Depression Rating Scale - Revised (CDRS-R): Impaired Schoolwork Item 1 | Week 6 (n=30, 8) | -0.1 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.4 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Child Depression Rating Scale - Revised (CDRS-R): Impaired Schoolwork Item 1 | Week 6 [LOCF] (n=39, 15) | -0.1 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.1 |
Change From Baseline in Child Depression Rating Scale - Revised (CDRS-R): Suicide Ideation Item 13
CDRS-R: clinician-rated interview-based scale (with both child and parent or guardian) to assess 17 distinct symptom areas to derive an index of depression severity. Discrepancies between informants' responses were resolved by using most impaired rating given by valid informant. Suicide Ideation (Item 13) detects changes in suicidality over time. Rated on a 7-point scale; range from 1 (no impairment) to 7 (indicates greater impairment).
Time frame: Baseline, Week 1 through Week 6
Population: ITT; N=number of subjects with analyzable data at baseline; (n)=number of subjects with analyzable data at post-baseline observation for ziprasidone and placebo, respectively. LOCF imputation used for Week 6 LOCF timepoint.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ziprasidone | Change From Baseline in Child Depression Rating Scale - Revised (CDRS-R): Suicide Ideation Item 13 | Week 1 (n=188, 86) | -0.1 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.4 |
| Ziprasidone | Change From Baseline in Child Depression Rating Scale - Revised (CDRS-R): Suicide Ideation Item 13 | Week 6 [LOCF] (n=189, 87) | 0.0 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.6 |
| Ziprasidone | Change From Baseline in Child Depression Rating Scale - Revised (CDRS-R): Suicide Ideation Item 13 | Week 5 (n=141, 54) | 0.0 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.4 |
| Ziprasidone | Change From Baseline in Child Depression Rating Scale - Revised (CDRS-R): Suicide Ideation Item 13 | Week 3 (n=165, 74) | -0.1 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.5 |
| Ziprasidone | Change From Baseline in Child Depression Rating Scale - Revised (CDRS-R): Suicide Ideation Item 13 | Week 6 (n=134, 52) | -0.0 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.3 |
| Ziprasidone | Change From Baseline in Child Depression Rating Scale - Revised (CDRS-R): Suicide Ideation Item 13 | Week 2 (n=182, 86) | -0.0 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.5 |
| Ziprasidone | Change From Baseline in Child Depression Rating Scale - Revised (CDRS-R): Suicide Ideation Item 13 | Week 4 (n=154, 63) | 0.0 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.5 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Child Depression Rating Scale - Revised (CDRS-R): Suicide Ideation Item 13 | Week 6 [LOCF] (n=189, 87) | -0.0 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.5 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Child Depression Rating Scale - Revised (CDRS-R): Suicide Ideation Item 13 | Week 2 (n=182, 86) | -0.1 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.5 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Child Depression Rating Scale - Revised (CDRS-R): Suicide Ideation Item 13 | Week 3 (n=165, 74) | -0.1 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.3 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Child Depression Rating Scale - Revised (CDRS-R): Suicide Ideation Item 13 | Week 4 (n=154, 63) | -0.1 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.5 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Child Depression Rating Scale - Revised (CDRS-R): Suicide Ideation Item 13 | Week 5 (n=141, 54) | -0.1 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.5 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Child Depression Rating Scale - Revised (CDRS-R): Suicide Ideation Item 13 | Week 6 (n=134, 52) | -0.1 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.4 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Child Depression Rating Scale - Revised (CDRS-R): Suicide Ideation Item 13 | Week 1 (n=188, 86) | -0.0 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.5 |
Change From Baseline in Child Depression Rating Scale - Revised (CDRS-R): Total Score
CDRS-R: clinician-rated interview-based scale (with both child and parent or guardian) to assess 17 distinct symptom areas to derive an index of depression severity. Discrepancies between informants' responses were resolved by using most impaired rating given by valid informant. Rated on a 7-point scale; range from 1 (no impairment) to 7 (indicates greater impairment). Total score calculated as sum of the 17 items (range 1 to 119); higher score indicates greater impairment.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 1 through Week 6
Population: ITT; N=number of subjects with analyzable data at baseline; (n)=number of subjects with analyzable data at post-baseline observation for ziprasidone and placebo, respectively. LOCF imputation used for Week 6 LOCF timepoint.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ziprasidone | Change From Baseline in Child Depression Rating Scale - Revised (CDRS-R): Total Score | Week 5 (n=135, 49) | -7.0 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 8.5 |
| Ziprasidone | Change From Baseline in Child Depression Rating Scale - Revised (CDRS-R): Total Score | Week 1 (n=179, 82) | -2.8 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 6.6 |
| Ziprasidone | Change From Baseline in Child Depression Rating Scale - Revised (CDRS-R): Total Score | Week 2 (n=174, 80) | -4.2 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.3 |
| Ziprasidone | Change From Baseline in Child Depression Rating Scale - Revised (CDRS-R): Total Score | Week 3 (n=157, 69) | -5.5 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.4 |
| Ziprasidone | Change From Baseline in Child Depression Rating Scale - Revised (CDRS-R): Total Score | Week 4 (n=148, 59) | -6.0 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.6 |
| Ziprasidone | Change From Baseline in Child Depression Rating Scale - Revised (CDRS-R): Total Score | Week 6 (n=126, 47) | -7.9 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.9 |
| Ziprasidone | Change From Baseline in Child Depression Rating Scale - Revised (CDRS-R): Total Score | Week 6 [LOCF] (n=178, 82) | -5.8 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 8.7 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Child Depression Rating Scale - Revised (CDRS-R): Total Score | Week 6 (n=126, 47) | -6.5 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 5.5 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Child Depression Rating Scale - Revised (CDRS-R): Total Score | Week 4 (n=148, 59) | -4.9 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 6.6 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Child Depression Rating Scale - Revised (CDRS-R): Total Score | Week 1 (n=179, 82) | -1.4 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 5.7 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Child Depression Rating Scale - Revised (CDRS-R): Total Score | Week 5 (n=135, 49) | -5.6 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 5.9 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Child Depression Rating Scale - Revised (CDRS-R): Total Score | Week 2 (n=174, 80) | -2.5 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 5.6 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Child Depression Rating Scale - Revised (CDRS-R): Total Score | Week 6 [LOCF] (n=178, 82) | -4.0 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.3 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Child Depression Rating Scale - Revised (CDRS-R): Total Score | Week 3 (n=157, 69) | -3.2 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 5.4 |
Change From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ)
CHQ: 50-item, 15 subscale parent or legal guardian assessed instrument of child's physical, emotional, social well-being, and relative burden of disease on the parents; rated on Likert-type scale: range 0 to 100; higher scores indicate a more positive health status. Global indicators for Physical Health and Psychosocial Health are weighted composites derived from subscale items using scoring algorithms (transformed scores); range 0 to 100: higher scores indicate more positive health status.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 6, ET
Population: ITT. ET includes observations from visits not within windowing criteria. LOCF imputation used for Week 6 LOCF timepoint.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ziprasidone | Change From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ) | Global behavior: Week 6 [LOCF] | 8.8 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 23.1 |
| Ziprasidone | Change From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ) | Mental health: Week 6 | 8.1 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 15.3 |
| Ziprasidone | Change From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ) | Bodily pain: Week 6 | 4.4 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 21.6 |
| Ziprasidone | Change From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ) | Mental health: ET | 1.3 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 17.9 |
| Ziprasidone | Change From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ) | Global health: Week 6 [LOCF] | 2.8 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 19.9 |
| Ziprasidone | Change From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ) | Mental health: Week 6 [LOCF] | 6.7 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 16.1 |
| Ziprasidone | Change From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ) | Bodily pain: ET | 4.7 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 23 |
| Ziprasidone | Change From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ) | Physical function: Week 6 | 5.6 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 19.7 |
| Ziprasidone | Change From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ) | Family cohesion: Week 6 | 1.9 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 21.3 |
| Ziprasidone | Change From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ) | Physical function: ET | -5.4 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 22.5 |
| Ziprasidone | Change From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ) | Bodily pain: Week 6 [LOCF] | 4.5 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 21.9 |
| Ziprasidone | Change From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ) | Physical function: Week 6 [LOCF] | 3.3 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 20.8 |
| Ziprasidone | Change From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ) | Global health: ET | -5.4 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 24 |
| Ziprasidone | Change From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ) | Behavior scale: Week 6 | 9.0 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 17.1 |
| Ziprasidone | Change From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ) | Behavior scale: ET | 7.6 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 15.2 |
| Ziprasidone | Change From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ) | Emotion, behavior: Week 6 | 16.2 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 29.8 |
| Ziprasidone | Change From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ) | Behavior scale: Week 6 [LOCF] | 8.7 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 16.7 |
| Ziprasidone | Change From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ) | Family cohesion: ET | -1.8 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 18.4 |
| Ziprasidone | Change From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ) | Emotion, behavior: ET | 4.0 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 43.1 |
| Ziprasidone | Change From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ) | Self-esteem: ET | 1.0 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 20.6 |
| Ziprasidone | Change From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ) | Self-esteem: Week 6 | 6.0 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 17.5 |
| Ziprasidone | Change From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ) | Self-esteem: Week 6 [LOCF] | 5.0 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 18.2 |
| Ziprasidone | Change From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ) | Emotion, behavior: Week 6 [LOCF] | 13.6 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 33.4 |
| Ziprasidone | Change From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ) | Family activities: Week 6 | 9.2 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 22.6 |
| Ziprasidone | Change From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ) | General health perception: Week 6 | 1.1 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 11.6 |
| Ziprasidone | Change From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ) | Family cohesion: Week 6 [LOCF] | 1.2 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 20.8 |
| Ziprasidone | Change From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ) | General health perception: ET | -2.2 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 12.3 |
| Ziprasidone | Change From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ) | Time impact on parent: Week 6 | 8.8 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 25.4 |
| Ziprasidone | Change From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ) | General health perception: Week 6 [LOCF] | 0.4 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 11.8 |
| Ziprasidone | Change From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ) | Global behavior: Week 6 | 9.4 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 23.6 |
| Ziprasidone | Change From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ) | Time impact on parent: ET | 2.0 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 25.8 |
| Ziprasidone | Change From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ) | Family activities: ET | 1.3 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 16.8 |
| Ziprasidone | Change From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ) | Physical health: Week 6 | 3.5 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 33.9 |
| Ziprasidone | Change From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ) | Family activities: Week 6 [LOCF] | 7.5 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 21.7 |
| Ziprasidone | Change From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ) | Change in health: Week 6 | 0.5 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.1 |
| Ziprasidone | Change From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ) | Time impact on parent: Week 6 [LOCF] | 7.4 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 25.5 |
| Ziprasidone | Change From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ) | Change in health: ET | -0.4 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 1 |
| Ziprasidone | Change From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ) | Change in health: Week 6 [LOCF] | 0.3 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.1 |
| Ziprasidone | Change From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ) | Global behavior: ET | 6.4 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 21.4 |
| Ziprasidone | Change From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ) | Physical health global subscale: Week 6 | 1.8 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 9.7 |
| Ziprasidone | Change From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ) | Emotional impact on parent: Week 6 | 8.9 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 21.6 |
| Ziprasidone | Change From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ) | Physical health global subscale: ET | -2.8 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 11.8 |
| Ziprasidone | Change From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ) | Physical health: ET | -6.5 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 32.9 |
| Ziprasidone | Change From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ) | Physical health global subscale: Week 6 [LOCF] | 0.9 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 10.3 |
| Ziprasidone | Change From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ) | Emotional impact on parent: ET | 3.5 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 21.2 |
| Ziprasidone | Change From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ) | Psychosocial health global subscale: Week 6 | 6.6 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 9.5 |
| Ziprasidone | Change From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ) | Physical health: Week 6 [LOCF] | 1.4 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 33.8 |
| Ziprasidone | Change From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ) | Psychosocial health global subscale: ET | 3.1 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 10.4 |
| Ziprasidone | Change From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ) | Emotional impact on parent: Week 6 [LOCF] | 7.7 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 21.6 |
| Ziprasidone | Change From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ) | Psychosocial health global subscale: Week 6 [LOCF] | 5.9 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 9.8 |
| Ziprasidone | Change From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ) | Global health: Week 6 | 5.0 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 18.2 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ) | Psychosocial health global subscale: Week 6 [LOCF] | 4.8 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 10 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ) | Global health: ET | -9.1 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 17.4 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ) | Behavior scale: Week 6 | 9.0 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 16.8 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ) | Family activities: Week 6 [LOCF] | 7.8 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 22 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ) | Change in health: ET | -0.1 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.8 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ) | Global health: Week 6 | 8.5 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 24.7 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ) | Global health: Week 6 [LOCF] | 1.4 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 23.7 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ) | Global behavior: Week 6 | 10.9 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 22.1 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ) | Global behavior: ET | -0.5 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 23 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ) | Global behavior: Week 6 [LOCF] | 6.5 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 23.1 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ) | Family cohesion: Week 6 | -0.8 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 19.7 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ) | Family cohesion: ET | -2.6 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 16.1 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ) | Family cohesion: Week 6 [LOCF] | -1.1 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 18.1 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ) | Physical health: Week 6 | 5.0 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 28 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ) | Physical health: ET | 3.2 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 23.3 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ) | Physical health: Week 6 [LOCF] | 4.8 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 26 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ) | Bodily pain: Week 6 | 8.0 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 19.4 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ) | Bodily pain: ET | 0.0 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 14.6 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ) | Bodily pain: Week 6 [LOCF] | 4.9 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 18.1 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ) | Emotion, behavior: Week 6 | 13.8 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 31.1 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ) | Emotion, behavior: ET | -2.5 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 22.7 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ) | Emotion, behavior: Week 6 [LOCF] | 7.8 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 29.2 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ) | Time impact on parent: Week 6 | 11.8 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 23.1 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ) | Time impact on parent: ET | 1.8 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 21.7 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ) | Time impact on parent: Week 6 [LOCF] | 8.0 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 23.1 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ) | Emotional impact on parent: Week 6 | 10.0 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 22.3 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ) | Emotional impact on parent: ET | 2.7 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 12.6 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ) | Emotional impact on parent: Week 6 [LOCF] | 7.4 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 19.4 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ) | Mental health: Week 6 | 12.6 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 18.2 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ) | Mental health: ET | -0.8 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 12 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ) | Mental health: Week 6 [LOCF] | 7.5 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 17.4 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ) | Physical function: Week 6 | 5.9 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 25.2 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ) | Physical function: ET | -0.2 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 17.7 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ) | Physical function: Week 6 [LOCF] | 3.7 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 22.8 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ) | Behavior scale: ET | 0.6 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 17.1 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ) | Behavior scale: Week 6 [LOCF] | 5.8 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 17.4 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ) | Self-esteem: Week 6 | 9.0 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 22.9 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ) | Self-esteem: ET | 1.3 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 14 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ) | Self-esteem: Week 6 [LOCF] | 6.4 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 20.2 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ) | General health perception: Week 6 | 3.3 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 11.7 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ) | General health perception: ET | -0.6 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 10.8 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ) | General health perception: Week 6 [LOCF] | 1.8 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 11.5 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ) | Family activities: Week 6 | 14.6 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 22.5 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ) | Family activities: ET | -4.6 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 16.5 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ) | Change in health: Week 6 | 0.6 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 1 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ) | Change in health: Week 6 [LOCF] | 0.3 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 1 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ) | Physical health global subscale: Week 6 | 2.4 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 9.8 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ) | Physical health global subscale: ET | 0.1 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 4.4 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ) | Physical health global subscale: Week 6 [LOCF] | 1.6 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 8.2 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ) | Psychosocial health global subscale: Week 6 | 7.7 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 11 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ) | Psychosocial health global subscale: ET | 0.0 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 5.7 |
Change From Baseline in Children's Global Assessment Scale (CGAS)
CGAS: clinician-rated global assessment item for children based on symptoms and social functioning in home, school, and community settings. Scores on this single item range from 1 to 100 (higher levels indicate greater health) with descriptive anchors for every 10-point interval. Scores above 70 on this scale are considered within the normal range; lower score indicates need for increased supervision.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 2, Week 4, Week 6, Early termination (ET)
Population: ITT; (n)=number of subjects with analyzable data at post-baseline observation for ziprasidone and placebo, respectively. ET includes observations from visits not within windowing criteria. Last observation carried forward \[LOCF\] imputation used for Week 6 LOCF timepoint.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ziprasidone | Change From Baseline in Children's Global Assessment Scale (CGAS) | Week 6 [LOCF] (n=185, 87) | 8.4 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 11.8 |
| Ziprasidone | Change From Baseline in Children's Global Assessment Scale (CGAS) | Week 2 (n=183, 86) | 4.7 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 8.7 |
| Ziprasidone | Change From Baseline in Children's Global Assessment Scale (CGAS) | Week 4 (n=155, 63) | 7.9 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 10.4 |
| Ziprasidone | Change From Baseline in Children's Global Assessment Scale (CGAS) | Week 6 (n=135, 52) | 10.9 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 11.8 |
| Ziprasidone | Change From Baseline in Children's Global Assessment Scale (CGAS) | ET (n=20, 15) | 1.3 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 10.1 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Children's Global Assessment Scale (CGAS) | ET (n=20, 15) | 1.7 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 8.9 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Children's Global Assessment Scale (CGAS) | Week 6 (n=135, 52) | 10.8 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 9.9 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Children's Global Assessment Scale (CGAS) | Week 2 (n=183, 86) | 2.6 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 5.8 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Children's Global Assessment Scale (CGAS) | Week 6 [LOCF] (n=185, 87) | 6.4 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 10.6 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Children's Global Assessment Scale (CGAS) | Week 4 (n=155, 63) | 6.2 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 8.9 |
Change From Baseline in Children's Problem Behavior and Aggression Questionnaire (CPBAQ) Total Score
CPBAQ: 19-item parent or legal guardian completed questionnaire to rate the child's verbal (such as yelling or cursing) and physical aggression (such a fighting with peers or being cruel to an animal) during the past week. Behavior was rated on a 4-point scale; range 0 (behavior did not occur or was not a problem) to 3 (behavior occurred a lot or was severe problem). Total score range 0 to 57; higher scores indicate a greater frequency and severity of aggression.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 1 through Week 6
Population: ITT; N=number of subjects with analyzable data at baseline; (n)= number of subjects with analyzable data at post-baseline observation for ziprasidone and placebo, respectively. LOCF imputation used for Week 6 LOCF timepoint.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ziprasidone | Change From Baseline in Children's Problem Behavior and Aggression Questionnaire (CPBAQ) Total Score | Week 1 (n=165, 69) | -2.4 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.1 |
| Ziprasidone | Change From Baseline in Children's Problem Behavior and Aggression Questionnaire (CPBAQ) Total Score | Week 5 (n=126, 44) | -3.1 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 7 |
| Ziprasidone | Change From Baseline in Children's Problem Behavior and Aggression Questionnaire (CPBAQ) Total Score | Week 2 (n=161, 71) | -2.5 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 8 |
| Ziprasidone | Change From Baseline in Children's Problem Behavior and Aggression Questionnaire (CPBAQ) Total Score | Week 6 (n=119, 42) | -3.0 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.4 |
| Ziprasidone | Change From Baseline in Children's Problem Behavior and Aggression Questionnaire (CPBAQ) Total Score | Week 4 (n=138, 51) | -2.7 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.4 |
| Ziprasidone | Change From Baseline in Children's Problem Behavior and Aggression Questionnaire (CPBAQ) Total Score | Week 6 [LOCF] (n=167, 71) | -2.3 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 8.2 |
| Ziprasidone | Change From Baseline in Children's Problem Behavior and Aggression Questionnaire (CPBAQ) Total Score | Week 3 (n=146, 64) | -3.0 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 6.7 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Children's Problem Behavior and Aggression Questionnaire (CPBAQ) Total Score | Week 6 [LOCF] (n=167, 71) | -0.3 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 8.8 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Children's Problem Behavior and Aggression Questionnaire (CPBAQ) Total Score | Week 1 (n=165, 69) | -1.3 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 5.8 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Children's Problem Behavior and Aggression Questionnaire (CPBAQ) Total Score | Week 2 (n=161, 71) | -1.0 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 6.2 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Children's Problem Behavior and Aggression Questionnaire (CPBAQ) Total Score | Week 3 (n=146, 64) | -0.7 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 5.7 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Children's Problem Behavior and Aggression Questionnaire (CPBAQ) Total Score | Week 4 (n=138, 51) | -1.0 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 6.5 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Children's Problem Behavior and Aggression Questionnaire (CPBAQ) Total Score | Week 5 (n=126, 44) | -0.8 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 8.3 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Children's Problem Behavior and Aggression Questionnaire (CPBAQ) Total Score | Week 6 (n=119, 42) | -1.9 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 6.7 |
Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impression of Severity (CGI-S) Score at Week 6
CGI-S: single-item clinician rated scale to rate the severity of a subject's illness over time. Scores range from 1 (normal, not at all ill) to 7 (among the most severely ill subjects); higher score indicates more affected.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 6
Population: ITT; N=number of subjects with analyzable data at post-baseline observation.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ziprasidone | Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impression of Severity (CGI-S) Score at Week 6 | -1.05 scores on a scale | Standard Error 0.08 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impression of Severity (CGI-S) Score at Week 6 | -0.84 scores on a scale | Standard Error 0.12 |
Change From Baseline in CNS Vital Signs Cognitive Test Battery (Includes Sedation Item): Subscales
A computerized subject-administered test battery with subtests for verbal and visual memory, processing speed, nonverbal reasoning, executive functioning, working memory, and sustained attention. A computerized 7-point sedation item (0 \[not sleepy\] to 10 \[very sleepy\]) was completed prior to test battery. The Neurocognitive index score was derived from subtest scores per an algorithm. The index score and subtest scores assessed the subject's changes in cognition. Scores were rated as above average (score \>109), average (90 to 109), below average (80 to 89), or well below average (70 to 79).
Time frame: Baseline, Week 6, ET
Population: ITT; N=number of subjects with analyzable data at baseline; (n)= number of subjects with analyzable data at post-baseline observation for ziprasidone and placebo, respectively. ET includes observations from visits not within windowing criteria. LOCF imputation used for Week 6 LOCF timepoint (last post-baseline non-missing visit).
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ziprasidone | Change From Baseline in CNS Vital Signs Cognitive Test Battery (Includes Sedation Item): Subscales | Sedation: ET (n=23, 26) | 0.0 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.3 |
| Ziprasidone | Change From Baseline in CNS Vital Signs Cognitive Test Battery (Includes Sedation Item): Subscales | Reasoning: Week 6 (n=122, 46) | 2.2 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 12 |
| Ziprasidone | Change From Baseline in CNS Vital Signs Cognitive Test Battery (Includes Sedation Item): Subscales | Visual Memory: Week 6 (n=124, 46) | 0.5 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 13.3 |
| Ziprasidone | Change From Baseline in CNS Vital Signs Cognitive Test Battery (Includes Sedation Item): Subscales | Reasoning: ET (n=23, 25) | 1.3 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 15.8 |
| Ziprasidone | Change From Baseline in CNS Vital Signs Cognitive Test Battery (Includes Sedation Item): Subscales | Verbal Memory: Week 6 (n=124, 47) | 1.3 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 12.1 |
| Ziprasidone | Change From Baseline in CNS Vital Signs Cognitive Test Battery (Includes Sedation Item): Subscales | Reasoning: Week 6 [LOCF] (n=145, 70) | 1.9 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 12.7 |
| Ziprasidone | Change From Baseline in CNS Vital Signs Cognitive Test Battery (Includes Sedation Item): Subscales | Visual Memory: ET (n=24, 26) | -3.8 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 10.2 |
| Ziprasidone | Change From Baseline in CNS Vital Signs Cognitive Test Battery (Includes Sedation Item): Subscales | Executive Functioning: Week 6 (n=123, 46) | 2.9 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 15.4 |
| Ziprasidone | Change From Baseline in CNS Vital Signs Cognitive Test Battery (Includes Sedation Item): Subscales | Sedation: Week 6 (n=124, 47) | 0.0 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.7 |
| Ziprasidone | Change From Baseline in CNS Vital Signs Cognitive Test Battery (Includes Sedation Item): Subscales | Executive Functioning: ET (n=23, 26) | -6.7 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 9.1 |
| Ziprasidone | Change From Baseline in CNS Vital Signs Cognitive Test Battery (Includes Sedation Item): Subscales | Visual Memory: Week 6 [LOCF] (n=148, 71) | -0.2 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 12.9 |
| Ziprasidone | Change From Baseline in CNS Vital Signs Cognitive Test Battery (Includes Sedation Item): Subscales | Executive Functioning: Week 6 [LOCF] (n=146, 71) | 1.4 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 14.9 |
| Ziprasidone | Change From Baseline in CNS Vital Signs Cognitive Test Battery (Includes Sedation Item): Subscales | Verbal Memory: ET (n=24, 25) | -2.3 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 13.9 |
| Ziprasidone | Change From Baseline in CNS Vital Signs Cognitive Test Battery (Includes Sedation Item): Subscales | Processing Speed: Week 6 (n=124, 46) | 1.3 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 13.5 |
| Ziprasidone | Change From Baseline in CNS Vital Signs Cognitive Test Battery (Includes Sedation Item): Subscales | Working Memory: ET (n=23, 24) | 3.2 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 13.5 |
| Ziprasidone | Change From Baseline in CNS Vital Signs Cognitive Test Battery (Includes Sedation Item): Subscales | Sedation: Week 6 [LOCF] (n=147, 72) | 0.0 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.8 |
| Ziprasidone | Change From Baseline in CNS Vital Signs Cognitive Test Battery (Includes Sedation Item): Subscales | Working Memory: Week 6 [LOCF] (n=143, 68) | 2.0 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 12.9 |
| Ziprasidone | Change From Baseline in CNS Vital Signs Cognitive Test Battery (Includes Sedation Item): Subscales | Processing Speed: ET (n=24, 25) | -10.6 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 34.5 |
| Ziprasidone | Change From Baseline in CNS Vital Signs Cognitive Test Battery (Includes Sedation Item): Subscales | Sustained Attention: Week 6 (n=120, 45) | 2.0 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 12.3 |
| Ziprasidone | Change From Baseline in CNS Vital Signs Cognitive Test Battery (Includes Sedation Item): Subscales | Verbal Memory: Week 6 [LOCF] (n=148, 71) | 0.7 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 12.4 |
| Ziprasidone | Change From Baseline in CNS Vital Signs Cognitive Test Battery (Includes Sedation Item): Subscales | Sustained Attention: ET (n=23, 24) | 0.5 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 13.5 |
| Ziprasidone | Change From Baseline in CNS Vital Signs Cognitive Test Battery (Includes Sedation Item): Subscales | Processing Speed: Week 6 [LOCF] (n=148, 70) | -0.6 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 18.9 |
| Ziprasidone | Change From Baseline in CNS Vital Signs Cognitive Test Battery (Includes Sedation Item): Subscales | Sustained Attention: Week 6 [LOCF] (n=143, 68) | 1.7 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 12.4 |
| Ziprasidone | Change From Baseline in CNS Vital Signs Cognitive Test Battery (Includes Sedation Item): Subscales | Working Memory: Week 6 (n=120, 45) | 1.9 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 12.9 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in CNS Vital Signs Cognitive Test Battery (Includes Sedation Item): Subscales | Sustained Attention: Week 6 [LOCF] (n=143, 68) | -0.9 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 12.6 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in CNS Vital Signs Cognitive Test Battery (Includes Sedation Item): Subscales | Sedation: Week 6 (n=124, 47) | -0.4 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.8 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in CNS Vital Signs Cognitive Test Battery (Includes Sedation Item): Subscales | Sedation: ET (n=23, 26) | 0.2 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.3 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in CNS Vital Signs Cognitive Test Battery (Includes Sedation Item): Subscales | Sedation: Week 6 [LOCF] (n=147, 72) | -0.2 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.7 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in CNS Vital Signs Cognitive Test Battery (Includes Sedation Item): Subscales | Verbal Memory: Week 6 (n=124, 47) | 0.5 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 14 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in CNS Vital Signs Cognitive Test Battery (Includes Sedation Item): Subscales | Verbal Memory: ET (n=24, 25) | -2.6 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 15.1 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in CNS Vital Signs Cognitive Test Battery (Includes Sedation Item): Subscales | Verbal Memory: Week 6 [LOCF] (n=148, 71) | -0.5 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 14.4 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in CNS Vital Signs Cognitive Test Battery (Includes Sedation Item): Subscales | Visual Memory: Week 6 (n=124, 46) | 2.0 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 14.5 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in CNS Vital Signs Cognitive Test Battery (Includes Sedation Item): Subscales | Visual Memory: ET (n=24, 26) | 0.4 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 14.2 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in CNS Vital Signs Cognitive Test Battery (Includes Sedation Item): Subscales | Visual Memory: Week 6 [LOCF] (n=148, 71) | 1.2 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 14.3 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in CNS Vital Signs Cognitive Test Battery (Includes Sedation Item): Subscales | Processing Speed: Week 6 (n=124, 46) | 1.0 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 12 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in CNS Vital Signs Cognitive Test Battery (Includes Sedation Item): Subscales | Processing Speed: ET (n=24, 25) | 0.5 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 5.4 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in CNS Vital Signs Cognitive Test Battery (Includes Sedation Item): Subscales | Processing Speed: Week 6 [LOCF] (n=148, 70) | 0.6 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 10.1 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in CNS Vital Signs Cognitive Test Battery (Includes Sedation Item): Subscales | Reasoning: Week 6 (n=122, 46) | -0.7 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 14.6 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in CNS Vital Signs Cognitive Test Battery (Includes Sedation Item): Subscales | Reasoning: ET (n=23, 25) | 3.3 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 14 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in CNS Vital Signs Cognitive Test Battery (Includes Sedation Item): Subscales | Reasoning: Week 6 [LOCF] (n=145, 70) | 0.7 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 14.1 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in CNS Vital Signs Cognitive Test Battery (Includes Sedation Item): Subscales | Executive Functioning: Week 6 (n=123, 46) | 2.7 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 18.2 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in CNS Vital Signs Cognitive Test Battery (Includes Sedation Item): Subscales | Executive Functioning: ET (n=23, 26) | 4.6 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 13.2 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in CNS Vital Signs Cognitive Test Battery (Includes Sedation Item): Subscales | Executive Functioning: Week 6 [LOCF] (n=146, 71) | 3.2 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 16.6 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in CNS Vital Signs Cognitive Test Battery (Includes Sedation Item): Subscales | Working Memory: Week 6 (n=120, 45) | 0.5 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 12.9 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in CNS Vital Signs Cognitive Test Battery (Includes Sedation Item): Subscales | Working Memory: ET (n=23, 24) | 3.7 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 11 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in CNS Vital Signs Cognitive Test Battery (Includes Sedation Item): Subscales | Working Memory: Week 6 [LOCF] (n=143, 68) | 1.3 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 12.2 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in CNS Vital Signs Cognitive Test Battery (Includes Sedation Item): Subscales | Sustained Attention: Week 6 (n=120, 45) | -1.6 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 13.1 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in CNS Vital Signs Cognitive Test Battery (Includes Sedation Item): Subscales | Sustained Attention: ET (n=23, 24) | 1.5 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 11.6 |
Change From Baseline in CNS Vital Signs Cognitive Test Battery: Neurocognitive Index
A computerized subject-administered test battery with subtests for verbal and visual memory, processing speed, nonverbal reasoning, executive functioning, working memory, and sustained attention. A computerized 7-point sedation item (0 \[not sleepy\] to 10 \[very sleepy\]) was completed prior to test battery. The Neurocognitive index score was derived from subtest scores per an algorithm. The index score and subtest scores assessed the subject's changes in cognition. Scores were rated as above average (score \>109), average (90 to 109), below average (80 to 89), or well below average (70 to 79).
Time frame: Baseline, Week 6, ET
Population: ITT; N=number of subjects with analyzable data at baseline; (n)= number of subjects with analyzable data at post-baseline observation for ziprasidone and placebo, respectively. ET includes observations from visits not within windowing criteria. LOCF imputation used for Week 6 LOCF timepoint (last post-baseline non-missing visit).
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ziprasidone | Change From Baseline in CNS Vital Signs Cognitive Test Battery: Neurocognitive Index | Neurocognitive Index: Week 6 (n=120, 45) | 1.8 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.1 |
| Ziprasidone | Change From Baseline in CNS Vital Signs Cognitive Test Battery: Neurocognitive Index | Neurocognitive Index: ET (n=23, 23) | -2.7 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.6 |
| Ziprasidone | Change From Baseline in CNS Vital Signs Cognitive Test Battery: Neurocognitive Index | Neurocognitive Index: Week 6 [LOCF] (n=143, 67) | 1.0 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.4 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in CNS Vital Signs Cognitive Test Battery: Neurocognitive Index | Neurocognitive Index: Week 6 (n=120, 45) | 0.8 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.5 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in CNS Vital Signs Cognitive Test Battery: Neurocognitive Index | Neurocognitive Index: ET (n=23, 23) | 2.2 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.2 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in CNS Vital Signs Cognitive Test Battery: Neurocognitive Index | Neurocognitive Index: Week 6 [LOCF] (n=143, 67) | 1.1 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.4 |
Change From Baseline in Movement Disorder Scales: Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) Movement Cluster Score
AIMS: clinician rated 12-item scale to rate 7 body areas and global judgments on the severity of abnormal movements, incapacitation and subject's awareness of abnormal movements. Items 1 to 10 scored 0 (none) to 4 (severe) (total possible score 0 to 40; higher score indicates greater severity); items 11 to 14 are No or Yes response to dental status and sleep movements. Only the sum of the first 7 items to be analyzed (AIMS Movement Cluster score). Total score 0 to 28; higher score indicates greater severity.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 1 through Week 6
Population: ITT; N=number of subjects with analyzable data at baseline; (n)=number of subjects with analyzable data at post-baseline observation for ziprasidone and placebo, respectively. LOCF imputation used for Week 6 LOCF timepoint.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ziprasidone | Change From Baseline in Movement Disorder Scales: Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) Movement Cluster Score | Week 3 (n=166, 74) | 0.1 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.3 |
| Ziprasidone | Change From Baseline in Movement Disorder Scales: Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) Movement Cluster Score | Week 5 (n=142, 54) | -0.1 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.7 |
| Ziprasidone | Change From Baseline in Movement Disorder Scales: Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) Movement Cluster Score | Week 2 (n=183, 86) | 0.1 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.6 |
| Ziprasidone | Change From Baseline in Movement Disorder Scales: Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) Movement Cluster Score | Week 6 (n=135, 52) | 0.0 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.6 |
| Ziprasidone | Change From Baseline in Movement Disorder Scales: Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) Movement Cluster Score | Week 4 (n=155, 63) | 0.1 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.8 |
| Ziprasidone | Change From Baseline in Movement Disorder Scales: Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) Movement Cluster Score | Week 6 [LOCF] (n=190, 87) | 0.0 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.8 |
| Ziprasidone | Change From Baseline in Movement Disorder Scales: Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) Movement Cluster Score | Week 1 (n=190, 86) | 0.2 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.6 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Movement Disorder Scales: Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) Movement Cluster Score | Week 6 [LOCF] (n=190, 87) | -0.0 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.7 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Movement Disorder Scales: Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) Movement Cluster Score | Week 1 (n=190, 86) | -0.0 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.4 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Movement Disorder Scales: Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) Movement Cluster Score | Week 2 (n=183, 86) | 0.0 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.6 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Movement Disorder Scales: Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) Movement Cluster Score | Week 3 (n=166, 74) | 0.1 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 1 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Movement Disorder Scales: Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) Movement Cluster Score | Week 4 (n=155, 63) | -0.0 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.8 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Movement Disorder Scales: Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) Movement Cluster Score | Week 5 (n=142, 54) | 0.0 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.4 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Movement Disorder Scales: Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) Movement Cluster Score | Week 6 (n=135, 52) | 0.0 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.5 |
Change From Baseline in Movement Disorder Scales: Barnes Akathisia Rating Scale (BAS) Global Clinical Assessment Item
BAS: clinician rated scale to assess akathisia to determine the degree of subjective restlessness and distress associated with restlessness. First 3 items (Objective, Subjective, and Distress related to restlessness) rated on a 4-point scale with range 0 (no symptoms) to 3 (increased severity of symptoms). Item 4 Global Clinical Assessment of Akathisia rated on a 6-point scale range 0 (no symptoms) to 5 (increased severity of symptoms); higher score indicates increased severity. All rating are anchored. Only the Global Clinical Assessment of Akathisia was to be analyzed.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 1 through Week 6
Population: ITT; N=number of subjects with analyzable data at baseline; (n)= number of subjects with analyzable data at post-baseline observation for ziprasidone and placebo, respectively. LOCF imputation used for Week 6 LOCF timepoint.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ziprasidone | Change From Baseline in Movement Disorder Scales: Barnes Akathisia Rating Scale (BAS) Global Clinical Assessment Item | Week 2 (n=183, 86) | 0.1 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.7 |
| Ziprasidone | Change From Baseline in Movement Disorder Scales: Barnes Akathisia Rating Scale (BAS) Global Clinical Assessment Item | Week 5 (n=142, 54) | 0.1 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.5 |
| Ziprasidone | Change From Baseline in Movement Disorder Scales: Barnes Akathisia Rating Scale (BAS) Global Clinical Assessment Item | Week 1 (n=190, 86) | 0.1 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.6 |
| Ziprasidone | Change From Baseline in Movement Disorder Scales: Barnes Akathisia Rating Scale (BAS) Global Clinical Assessment Item | Week 6 (n=135, 52) | 0.0 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.5 |
| Ziprasidone | Change From Baseline in Movement Disorder Scales: Barnes Akathisia Rating Scale (BAS) Global Clinical Assessment Item | Week 3 (n=166, 74) | 0.1 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.6 |
| Ziprasidone | Change From Baseline in Movement Disorder Scales: Barnes Akathisia Rating Scale (BAS) Global Clinical Assessment Item | Week 6 [LOCF] (n=190, 87) | 0.0 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.6 |
| Ziprasidone | Change From Baseline in Movement Disorder Scales: Barnes Akathisia Rating Scale (BAS) Global Clinical Assessment Item | Week 4 (n=155, 63) | 0.1 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.6 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Movement Disorder Scales: Barnes Akathisia Rating Scale (BAS) Global Clinical Assessment Item | Week 6 [LOCF] (n=190, 87) | 0.0 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.2 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Movement Disorder Scales: Barnes Akathisia Rating Scale (BAS) Global Clinical Assessment Item | Week 1 (n=190, 86) | 0.1 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.4 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Movement Disorder Scales: Barnes Akathisia Rating Scale (BAS) Global Clinical Assessment Item | Week 2 (n=183, 86) | 0.0 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.3 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Movement Disorder Scales: Barnes Akathisia Rating Scale (BAS) Global Clinical Assessment Item | Week 4 (n=155, 63) | -0.0 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.2 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Movement Disorder Scales: Barnes Akathisia Rating Scale (BAS) Global Clinical Assessment Item | Week 5 (n=142, 54) | 0.0 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.2 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Movement Disorder Scales: Barnes Akathisia Rating Scale (BAS) Global Clinical Assessment Item | Week 6 (n=135, 52) | 0.0 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.2 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Movement Disorder Scales: Barnes Akathisia Rating Scale (BAS) Global Clinical Assessment Item | Week 3 (n=166, 74) | 0.0 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.3 |
Change From Baseline in Movement Disorder Scales: Simpson-Angus Rating Scale (SARS)
SARS: 10-item clinician rated instrument to assess parkinsonian symptoms (7 items) and related extrapyramidal side effects (3 items): gait, arm dropping, shoulder shaking, elbow rigidity, leg pendulousness, glabellar tap, tremor, and salivation. Head dropping (modified SARS item 7) substituted for head rotation. Anchored 5-point scale: range 0 (absence of condition, normal) to 4 (most extreme form of condition). Total score is sum of individual item scores (range 0 to 40); higher score indicates more affected.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 1 through Week 6
Population: ITT; N=number of subjects with analyzable data at baseline; (n)= number of subjects with analyzable data at post-baseline observation for ziprasidone and placebo, respectively. LOCF imputation used for Week 6 LOCF timepoint.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ziprasidone | Change From Baseline in Movement Disorder Scales: Simpson-Angus Rating Scale (SARS) | Week 3 (n=165, 74) | 0.7 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.1 |
| Ziprasidone | Change From Baseline in Movement Disorder Scales: Simpson-Angus Rating Scale (SARS) | Week 5 (n=141, 54) | 0.2 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.4 |
| Ziprasidone | Change From Baseline in Movement Disorder Scales: Simpson-Angus Rating Scale (SARS) | Week 2 (n=182, 85) | 0.5 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.4 |
| Ziprasidone | Change From Baseline in Movement Disorder Scales: Simpson-Angus Rating Scale (SARS) | Week 6 (n=134, 52) | 0.2 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.5 |
| Ziprasidone | Change From Baseline in Movement Disorder Scales: Simpson-Angus Rating Scale (SARS) | Week 4 (n=154, 62) | 0.4 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.6 |
| Ziprasidone | Change From Baseline in Movement Disorder Scales: Simpson-Angus Rating Scale (SARS) | Week 6 [LOCF] (n=189, 86) | 0.3 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.5 |
| Ziprasidone | Change From Baseline in Movement Disorder Scales: Simpson-Angus Rating Scale (SARS) | Week 1 (n=189, 85) | 0.5 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.8 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Movement Disorder Scales: Simpson-Angus Rating Scale (SARS) | Week 6 [LOCF] (n=189, 86) | -0.1 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.6 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Movement Disorder Scales: Simpson-Angus Rating Scale (SARS) | Week 1 (n=189, 85) | 0.1 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.9 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Movement Disorder Scales: Simpson-Angus Rating Scale (SARS) | Week 2 (n=182, 85) | -0.0 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.5 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Movement Disorder Scales: Simpson-Angus Rating Scale (SARS) | Week 3 (n=165, 74) | 0.3 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.6 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Movement Disorder Scales: Simpson-Angus Rating Scale (SARS) | Week 4 (n=154, 62) | -0.0 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.6 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Movement Disorder Scales: Simpson-Angus Rating Scale (SARS) | Week 5 (n=141, 54) | -0.0 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 1 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Movement Disorder Scales: Simpson-Angus Rating Scale (SARS) | Week 6 (n=134, 52) | -0.2 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.8 |
Change From Baseline in PANSS: Positive and Negative Subscales at Week 6
PANSS: 30-item clinician-rated scale to measure severity of psychopathology (16 items); positive scale (7 items); negative scale (7 items); summarized as positive score, negative score, and total score. Items scored on anchored Likert scale rated 1 (absent symptoms) to 7 (extreme); scores above 1 indicate clinical symptom is present; scores from 2 to 7 indicate increased severity. Total score range 30 to 210: higher score indicates greater severity.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 6
Population: ITT; N=number of subjects with analyzable data at post-baseline observation.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ziprasidone | Change From Baseline in PANSS: Positive and Negative Subscales at Week 6 | Positive score | -7.22 scores on a scale | Standard Error 0.44 |
| Ziprasidone | Change From Baseline in PANSS: Positive and Negative Subscales at Week 6 | Negative score | -5.51 scores on a scale | Standard Error 0.43 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in PANSS: Positive and Negative Subscales at Week 6 | Positive score | -5.88 scores on a scale | Standard Error 0.56 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in PANSS: Positive and Negative Subscales at Week 6 | Negative score | -5.09 scores on a scale | Standard Error 0.51 |
Change From Baseline in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) - Total Score at Week 6
PANSS: 30-item clinician-rated scale to measure severity of psychopathology (16 items); positive scale (7 items); negative scale (7 items); summarized as positive score, negative score, and total score. Items scored on anchored Likert scale rated 1 (absent symptoms) to 7 (extreme); scores above 1 indicate clinical symptom is present; scores from 2 to 7 indicate increased severity. Total score range 30 to 210: higher score indicates greater severity.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 6
Population: ITT; N=number of subjects with analyzable data at post-baseline observation.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ziprasidone | Change From Baseline in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) - Total Score at Week 6 | -23.58 scores on a scale | Standard Error 1.42 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) - Total Score at Week 6 | -21.01 scores on a scale | Standard Error 1.73 |
Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) Score at Week 6
CGI-I: single-item clinician rated scale used to assess the subject's improvement or worsening from baseline. Scores range from 1 (very much improved) to 4 (no change) to 7 (very much worse); higher score indicates more affected.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 6
Population: ITT; N=number of subjects with analyzable data at post-baseline observation.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ziprasidone | Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) Score at Week 6 | 2.66 scores on a scale | Standard Error 0.09 |
| Placebo | Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) Score at Week 6 | 2.85 scores on a scale | Standard Error 0.12 |
Number of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: Overall School Performance
School placement questionnaire: parent or legal guardian assessed questionnaire to determine whether the child is currently enrolled in school (or planned to be enrolled if on school holiday like summer break), whether attending regularly if enrolled, and how well the child is doing overall in school. Questions were modified from those used in the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) funded Treatment of Early Onset Schizophrenia Spectrum (TEOSS) study. Results determine whether subjects are currently attending school and qualitatively describe how well they are doing in school.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 2, Week 6, ET
Population: ITT; N=number of subjects analyzable for School Placement Questionnaire; (n)=number of subjects with analyzable data at baseline and post-baseline observation for ziprasidone and placebo, respectively. ET includes observations from visits not within windowing criteria. LOCF imputation used for Week 6 LOCF timepoint.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ziprasidone | Number of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: Overall School Performance | Week 2: Excellent (n=60, 26) | 5 participants |
| Ziprasidone | Number of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: Overall School Performance | ET: Good (n=8, 7) | 0 participants |
| Ziprasidone | Number of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: Overall School Performance | Week 6 [LOCF]: Very poor (n=68, 28) | 6 participants |
| Ziprasidone | Number of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: Overall School Performance | Baseline: Good (n=64, 29) | 10 participants |
| Ziprasidone | Number of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: Overall School Performance | Baseline: Fair (n=64, 29) | 25 participants |
| Ziprasidone | Number of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: Overall School Performance | Baseline: Poor (n=64, 29) | 19 participants |
| Ziprasidone | Number of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: Overall School Performance | Baseline: Very poor (n=64, 29) | 6 participants |
| Ziprasidone | Number of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: Overall School Performance | Baseline: Excellent (n=64, 29) | 4 participants |
| Ziprasidone | Number of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: Overall School Performance | Week 2: Good (n=60, 26) | 12 participants |
| Ziprasidone | Number of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: Overall School Performance | Week 2: Fair (n=60, 26) | 20 participants |
| Ziprasidone | Number of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: Overall School Performance | Week 2: Poor (n=60, 26) | 17 participants |
| Ziprasidone | Number of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: Overall School Performance | Week 2: Very poor (n=60, 26) | 6 participants |
| Ziprasidone | Number of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: Overall School Performance | Week 6: Excellent (n=52, 21) | 4 participants |
| Ziprasidone | Number of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: Overall School Performance | Week 6: Good (n=52, 21) | 16 participants |
| Ziprasidone | Number of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: Overall School Performance | Week 6: Fair (n=52, 21) | 17 participants |
| Ziprasidone | Number of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: Overall School Performance | Week 6: Poor (n=52, 21) | 12 participants |
| Ziprasidone | Number of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: Overall School Performance | Week 6: Very poor (n=52, 21) | 3 participants |
| Ziprasidone | Number of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: Overall School Performance | ET: Excellent (n=8, 7) | 0 participants |
| Ziprasidone | Number of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: Overall School Performance | ET: Fair (n=8, 7) | 5 participants |
| Ziprasidone | Number of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: Overall School Performance | ET: Poor (n=8, 7) | 2 participants |
| Ziprasidone | Number of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: Overall School Performance | ET: Very poor (n=8, 7) | 1 participants |
| Ziprasidone | Number of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: Overall School Performance | Week 6 [LOCF]: Excellent (n=68, 28) | 4 participants |
| Ziprasidone | Number of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: Overall School Performance | Week 6 [LOCF]: Good (n=68, 28) | 18 participants |
| Ziprasidone | Number of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: Overall School Performance | Week 6 [LOCF]: Fair (n=68, 28) | 24 participants |
| Ziprasidone | Number of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: Overall School Performance | Week 6 [LOCF]: Poor (n=68, 28) | 16 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: Overall School Performance | Week 6: Good (n=52, 21) | 8 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: Overall School Performance | Week 6 [LOCF]: Poor (n=68, 28) | 2 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: Overall School Performance | Week 6: Fair (n=52, 21) | 11 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: Overall School Performance | Baseline: Excellent (n=64, 29) | 2 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: Overall School Performance | ET: Very poor (n=8, 7) | 2 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: Overall School Performance | Baseline: Good (n=64, 29) | 6 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: Overall School Performance | Week 6: Poor (n=52, 21) | 1 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: Overall School Performance | Baseline: Fair (n=64, 29) | 14 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: Overall School Performance | Week 6 [LOCF]: Fair (n=68, 28) | 14 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: Overall School Performance | Baseline: Poor (n=64, 29) | 3 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: Overall School Performance | Week 6: Very poor (n=52, 21) | 0 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: Overall School Performance | Baseline: Very poor (n=64, 29) | 4 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: Overall School Performance | Week 6 [LOCF]: Excellent (n=68, 28) | 1 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: Overall School Performance | Week 2: Excellent (n=60, 26) | 1 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: Overall School Performance | ET: Excellent (n=8, 7) | 0 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: Overall School Performance | Week 2: Good (n=60, 26) | 8 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: Overall School Performance | ET: Good (n=8, 7) | 1 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: Overall School Performance | Week 2: Fair (n=60, 26) | 10 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: Overall School Performance | Week 6 [LOCF]: Very poor (n=68, 28) | 2 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: Overall School Performance | Week 2: Poor (n=60, 26) | 5 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: Overall School Performance | ET: Fair (n=8, 7) | 3 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: Overall School Performance | Week 2: Very poor (n=60, 26) | 2 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: Overall School Performance | Week 6 [LOCF]: Good (n=68, 28) | 9 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: Overall School Performance | Week 6: Excellent (n=52, 21) | 1 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: Overall School Performance | ET: Poor (n=8, 7) | 1 participants |
Number of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School Attendance
School placement questionnaire: parent or legal guardian assessed questionnaire to determine whether the child is currently enrolled in school (or planned to be enrolled if on school holiday like summer break), whether attending regularly if enrolled, and how well the child is doing overall in school. Questions were modified from those used in the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) funded Treatment of Early Onset Schizophrenia Spectrum (TEOSS) study. Results determine whether subjects are currently attending school and qualitatively describe how well they are doing in school.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 2, Week 6, ET
Population: ITT; N=number of subjects analyzable for School Placement Questionnaire; (n)=number of subjects with analyzable data at baseline and post-baseline observation for ziprasidone and placebo, respectively. ET includes observations from visits not within windowing criteria. LOCF imputation used for Week 6 LOCF timepoint.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ziprasidone | Number of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School Attendance | Baseline: Only a few absences (n=88, 42) | 16 participants |
| Ziprasidone | Number of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School Attendance | Week 6: Did not attend (n=67, 24) | 13 participants |
| Ziprasidone | Number of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School Attendance | Week 2: Only a few absences (n=82, 36) | 14 participants |
| Ziprasidone | Number of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School Attendance | Week 6: Not applicable or vacation (n=67, 24) | 11 participants |
| Ziprasidone | Number of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School Attendance | Baseline: Did not attend (n=88, 42) | 26 participants |
| Ziprasidone | Number of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School Attendance | ET: No absences (n=12, 12) | 1 participants |
| Ziprasidone | Number of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School Attendance | Week 2: Frequent absences (n=82, 36) | 11 participants |
| Ziprasidone | Number of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School Attendance | ET: Only a few absences (n=12, 12) | 4 participants |
| Ziprasidone | Number of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School Attendance | Baseline: No absences (n=88, 42) | 20 participants |
| Ziprasidone | Number of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School Attendance | ET: Frequent absences (n=12, 12) | 2 participants |
| Ziprasidone | Number of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School Attendance | Week 2: Did not attend (n=82, 36) | 25 participants |
| Ziprasidone | Number of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School Attendance | ET: Did not attend (n=12, 12) | 4 participants |
| Ziprasidone | Number of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School Attendance | Baseline: Not applicable or vacation (n=88, 42) | 13 participants |
| Ziprasidone | Number of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School Attendance | ET: Not applicable or vacation (n=12, 12) | 1 participants |
| Ziprasidone | Number of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School Attendance | Week 2: Not applicable or vacation (n=82, 36) | 13 participants |
| Ziprasidone | Number of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School Attendance | Week 6 [LOCF]: No absences (n=89, 37) | 18 participants |
| Ziprasidone | Number of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School Attendance | Baseline: Frequent absences (n=88, 42) | 13 participants |
| Ziprasidone | Number of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School Attendance | Week 6 [LOCF]: Only a few absences (n=89, 37) | 26 participants |
| Ziprasidone | Number of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School Attendance | Week 6: No absences (n=67, 24) | 16 participants |
| Ziprasidone | Number of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School Attendance | Week 6 [LOCF]: Frequent absences (n=89, 37) | 11 participants |
| Ziprasidone | Number of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School Attendance | Week 2: No absences (n=82, 36) | 19 participants |
| Ziprasidone | Number of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School Attendance | Week 6 [LOCF]: Did not attend (n=89, 37) | 21 participants |
| Ziprasidone | Number of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School Attendance | Week 6: Frequent absences (n=67, 24) | 5 participants |
| Ziprasidone | Number of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School Attendance | Week 6[LOCF]: Not applicable or vacation(n=89,37) | 13 participants |
| Ziprasidone | Number of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School Attendance | Week 6: Only a few absences (n=67, 24) | 22 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School Attendance | Week 6[LOCF]: Not applicable or vacation(n=89,37) | 8 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School Attendance | Week 6: Only a few absences (n=67, 24) | 12 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School Attendance | Baseline: No absences (n=88, 42) | 7 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School Attendance | Baseline: Only a few absences (n=88, 42) | 15 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School Attendance | Baseline: Frequent absences (n=88, 42) | 2 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School Attendance | Baseline: Did not attend (n=88, 42) | 7 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School Attendance | Baseline: Not applicable or vacation (n=88, 42) | 11 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School Attendance | Week 2: No absences (n=82, 36) | 8 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School Attendance | Week 2: Only a few absences (n=82, 36) | 9 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School Attendance | Week 2: Frequent absences (n=82, 36) | 4 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School Attendance | Week 2: Did not attend (n=82, 36) | 8 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School Attendance | Week 2: Not applicable or vacation (n=82, 36) | 7 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School Attendance | Week 6: No absences (n=67, 24) | 8 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School Attendance | Week 6: Frequent absences (n=67, 24) | 0 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School Attendance | Week 6: Did not attend (n=67, 24) | 0 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School Attendance | Week 6: Not applicable or vacation (n=67, 24) | 4 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School Attendance | ET: No absences (n=12, 12) | 0 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School Attendance | ET: Only a few absences (n=12, 12) | 0 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School Attendance | ET: Frequent absences (n=12, 12) | 5 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School Attendance | ET: Did not attend (n=12, 12) | 4 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School Attendance | ET: Not applicable or vacation (n=12, 12) | 3 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School Attendance | Week 6 [LOCF]: No absences (n=89, 37) | 8 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School Attendance | Week 6 [LOCF]: Only a few absences (n=89, 37) | 13 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School Attendance | Week 6 [LOCF]: Frequent absences (n=89, 37) | 4 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School Attendance | Week 6 [LOCF]: Did not attend (n=89, 37) | 4 participants |
Number of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School Situation
School placement questionnaire: parent or legal guardian assessed questionnaire to determine whether the child is currently enrolled in school (or planned to be enrolled if on school holiday like summer break), whether attending regularly if enrolled, and how well the child is doing overall in school. Questions were modified from those used in the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) funded Treatment of Early Onset Schizophrenia Spectrum (TEOSS) study. Results determine whether subjects are currently attending school and qualitatively describe how well they are doing in school.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 2, Week 6, ET
Population: ITT; N=number of subjects analyzable for School Placement Questionnaire; (n)=number of subjects with analyzable data at baseline and post-baseline observation for ziprasidone and placebo, respectively. ET includes observations from visits not within windowing criteria. LOCF imputation used for Week 6 LOCF timepoint.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ziprasidone | Number of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School Situation | Baseline: Not enrolled or other (n=185, 85) | 25 participants |
| Ziprasidone | Number of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School Situation | Week 2: Enrolled or attend (n=179, 84) | 38 participants |
| Ziprasidone | Number of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School Situation | Week 6 [LOCF]: Not enrolled or other (n=183, 86) | 26 participants |
| Ziprasidone | Number of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School Situation | Baseline: Enrolled or attend (n=185, 85) | 40 participants |
| Ziprasidone | Number of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School Situation | Baseline: Not attend or mental illness (n=185, 85) | 62 participants |
| Ziprasidone | Number of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School Situation | Baseline: Not attend or other (n=185, 85) | 2 participants |
| Ziprasidone | Number of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School Situation | Baseline: Enrolled or vacation (n=185, 85) | 20 participants |
| Ziprasidone | Number of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School Situation | Baseline: Not enrolled or mental illness | 36 participants |
| Ziprasidone | Number of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School Situation | Week 2: Not attend or mental illness (n=179, 84) | 59 participants |
| Ziprasidone | Number of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School Situation | Week 2: Not attend or other (n=179, 84) | 3 participants |
| Ziprasidone | Number of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School Situation | Week 2: Enrolled or vacation (n=179, 84) | 20 participants |
| Ziprasidone | Number of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School Situation | Week 2: Not enrolled or mental illness (n=179, 84) | 36 participants |
| Ziprasidone | Number of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School Situation | Week 2: Not enrolled or other (n=179, 84) | 23 participants |
| Ziprasidone | Number of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School Situation | Week 6: Enrolled or attend (n=134, 51) | 38 participants |
| Ziprasidone | Number of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School Situation | Week 6: Not attend or mental illness (n=134, 51) | 36 participants |
| Ziprasidone | Number of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School Situation | Week 6: Not attend or other (n=134, 51) | 3 participants |
| Ziprasidone | Number of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School Situation | Week 6: Enrolled or vacation (n=134, 51) | 14 participants |
| Ziprasidone | Number of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School Situation | Week 6: Not enrolled or mental illness (n=134, 51) | 23 participants |
| Ziprasidone | Number of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School Situation | Week 6: Not enrolled or other (n=134, 51) | 20 participants |
| Ziprasidone | Number of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School Situation | ET: Enrolled or attend (n=32, 25) | 5 participants |
| Ziprasidone | Number of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School Situation | ET: Not attend or mental illness (n=32, 25) | 8 participants |
| Ziprasidone | Number of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School Situation | ET: Not attend or other (n=32, 25) | 0 participants |
| Ziprasidone | Number of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School Situation | ET: Enrolled or vacation (n=32, 25) | 5 participants |
| Ziprasidone | Number of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School Situation | ET: Not enrolled or mental illness (n=32, 25) | 10 participants |
| Ziprasidone | Number of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School Situation | ET: Not enrolled or other (n=32, 25) | 4 participants |
| Ziprasidone | Number of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School Situation | Week 6 [LOCF]: Enrolled or attend (n=183, 86) | 47 participants |
| Ziprasidone | Number of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School Situation | Week 6 [LOCF]: Not attend or mental illness | 50 participants |
| Ziprasidone | Number of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School Situation | Week 6 [LOCF]: Not attend or other (n=183, 86) | 3 participants |
| Ziprasidone | Number of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School Situation | Week 6 [LOCF]: Enrolled or vacation (n=183, 86) | 21 participants |
| Ziprasidone | Number of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School Situation | Week 6 [LOCF]: Not enrolled or mental illness | 36 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School Situation | Week 6: Not attend or mental illness (n=134, 51) | 7 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School Situation | ET: Enrolled or vacation (n=32, 25) | 4 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School Situation | ET: Not attend or mental illness (n=32, 25) | 14 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School Situation | Week 6 [LOCF]: Not attend or mental illness | 86 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School Situation | Week 6: Not attend or other (n=134, 51) | 0 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School Situation | Week 6 [LOCF]: Not enrolled or other (n=183, 86) | 12 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School Situation | Baseline: Enrolled or attend (n=185, 85) | 15 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School Situation | Week 6: Enrolled or vacation (n=134, 51) | 5 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School Situation | Baseline: Not attend or mental illness (n=185, 85) | 26 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School Situation | ET: Not enrolled or mental illness (n=32, 25) | 3 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School Situation | Baseline: Not attend or other (n=185, 85) | 0 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School Situation | Week 6: Not enrolled or mental illness (n=134, 51) | 11 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School Situation | Baseline: Enrolled or vacation (n=185, 85) | 19 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School Situation | Week 6 [LOCF]: Not attend or other (n=183, 86) | 1 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School Situation | Baseline: Not enrolled or mental illness | 12 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School Situation | Baseline: Not enrolled or other (n=185, 85) | 13 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School Situation | Week 2: Enrolled or attend (n=179, 84) | 20 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School Situation | Week 6: Not enrolled or other (n=134, 51) | 10 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School Situation | Week 2: Not attend or mental illness (n=179, 84) | 24 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School Situation | ET: Not enrolled or other (n=32, 25) | 1 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School Situation | Week 2: Not attend or other (n=179, 84) | 2 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School Situation | ET: Enrolled or attend (n=32, 25) | 3 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School Situation | Week 2: Enrolled or vacation (n=179, 84) | 11 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School Situation | Week 6 [LOCF]: Not enrolled or mental illness | 17 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School Situation | Week 2: Not enrolled or mental illness (n=179, 84) | 15 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School Situation | Week 6 [LOCF]: Enrolled or attend (n=183, 86) | 23 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School Situation | Week 2: Not enrolled or other (n=179, 84) | 12 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School Situation | ET: Not attend or other (n=32, 25) | 0 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School Situation | Week 6: Enrolled or attend (n=134, 51) | 18 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Subjects Per Response on the School Placement Questionnaire: School Situation | Week 6 [LOCF]: Enrolled or vacation (n=183, 86) | 10 participants |