Skip to content

Treatment of Chronic Low Back Pain: A Trial Comparing Traditional Back School and Individual Therapist-Assisted Exercise

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00256373
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2005-11-21
Start date
2001-01-31
Completion date
2005-11-30
Last updated
2006-04-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic Low Back Pain

Keywords

Low Back Pain, Dynamic Back-Muscle exercise Treatment, Interdisciplinary Treatment, Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire, SF-36, Low Back Pain Rating Scale

Brief summary

Rheumatologists are discussing, whether rehabilitation of patients with low back pain (LBP) can be improved. At present patients with LBP start treatment as soon as possible, this also applies for patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP) - pain lasting over 12 weeks. At Glostrup University Hospital department of Physical Medicine/rheumatology we use a method (method A) where an interdisciplinary team gives the patients a treatment composed of various topics. This includes among other things education, physical team training, exercises in swimming pool, stretching exercises, and occupational therapy. A different method (method B) originates from the Rehabilitation centre in Karlslunde led by Teddy Oefeldt. Here they focus strictly on dynamic training of muscles in the back and the buttocks. A therapist, who in the beginning partly carries the patient through the exercises, assists this training. In both methods, individually considerations are taken, but to a greater extend in method B. The treatment will extend over a three months period. A few earlier investigations have compared these two methods, but they have not been systematized to such a degree, that they gave any final conclusions. Therefore, we initialized an investigation including a larger number of patients, where the two methods are compared from the results the patients achieve after 3, 6, 12 and 24 months. 286 consecutive patients were included and randomized to one of the two methods. Those, who did not wish to participate in the investigation, were treated according to the department's normal procedure (Method A)

Interventions

PROCEDUREMod. functional restoration-Individ. dynamic back-muscle

Sponsors

Sygekassernes Helsefond
CollaboratorOTHER
Apotekerfonden af 1991
CollaboratorOTHER
Indenrigs- og sundhedsministeriet
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
University Hospital, Gentofte, Copenhagen
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Low Back Pain lasting more than 12 weeks with or with out pain radiating into the leg(s) 2. Age 18 - 60 years

Exclusion criteria

1. Serious spinal pathology 1. Malignancy 2. Osteoporosis, 3. Fresh vertebral fracture 4. Newly operation on the back 5. Stenosis of the lumbar spine 6. Unstable spondylolistesis 7. Infections in the back 2. Neurological dysfunction of the thoracic or abdominal muscles 3. Pregnancy/breastfeeding 4. Mental illness 5. Health conditions which prohibit intensive training. 6. Languish problems/ dyslexia

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Pain VAS

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Low Back Pain Rating Scale
Medicine use
Work situation
SF-36
Change in physical activity
Global assessment
Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire
Pension

Countries

Denmark

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026