Skip to content

Massage Therapy in Treating the Symptoms of Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Cancer

Body-Based Complementary Therapies for Patients With Cancer

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00253708
Enrollment
39
Registered
2005-11-15
Start date
2004-12-01
Completion date
2013-01-01
Last updated
2017-08-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cancer

Keywords

depression, nausea and vomiting, pain, psychosocial effects of cancer and its treatment, stage IIIA non-small cell lung cancer, stage IIIB non-small cell lung cancer, stage IV non-small cell lung cancer, extensive stage small cell lung cancer, stage III gastric cancer, stage III esophageal cancer, localized unresectable adult primary liver cancer, stage III colon cancer, stage IV renal cell cancer, stage IV bladder cancer, stage IV prostate cancer, stage IV breast cancer, stage IV ovarian epithelial cancer, advanced adult primary liver cancer, stage IV melanoma, stage IV ovarian germ cell tumor, ovarian sarcoma, ovarian stromal cancer, recurrent small cell lung cancer, recurrent adult primary liver cancer, recurrent colon cancer, recurrent esophageal cancer, recurrent gastric cancer, recurrent non-small cell lung cancer, recurrent bladder cancer, recurrent breast cancer, recurrent ovarian epithelial cancer, recurrent ovarian germ cell tumor, recurrent prostate cancer, recurrent renal cell cancer, recurrent melanoma

Brief summary

RATIONALE: Massage therapy may help relieve symptoms associated with cancer. It is not yet known which type of massage therapy is more effective in treating the symptoms of patients with cancer. PURPOSE: This randomized clinical trial is studying different types of massage therapy to compare how well they work in treating the symptoms of patients with locally advanced or metastatic cancer.

Detailed description

OBJECTIVES: * Compare the safety and tolerated dose (i.e., duration, techniques, and degree of pressure) of professional massage therapy vs professional simple presence (no touch) massage therapy vs usual care followed by caregiver massage therapy vs usual care in patients with locally advanced or metastatic cancer. * Correlate these therapies with pain, anxiety, depression, nausea, and shortness of breath in these patients. * Correlate these therapies with patient quality of life and caregiver anxiety and depression. * Determine the feasibility of teaching family caregivers how to provide massage therapy and the subsequent use of massage by the caregivers. * Determine the effects of caregiver massage therapy on patients and caregivers. * Determine the feasibility and acceptability among patients and massage therapists of a simple presence (no touch) massage therapy control group. OUTLINE: This is a randomized, controlled, pilot study. Patients are randomized to 1 of 3 treatment arms. * Arm I (professional massage therapy): Hospitalized patients are offered massage therapy by a licensed massage therapist for 15-45 minutes once daily for the duration of their hospital stay. Outpatient oncology clinic patients are offered home-based massage therapy by a licensed massage therapist for 15-45 minutes once daily for 3 days. * Arm II (usual care): Patients receive usual care for symptom management. * Arm III (professional simple presence \[no touch\] massage therapy): Hospitalized patients are offered simple presence (no touch) massage therapy comprising a room visit by a licensed massage therapist who places his/her hands 12 inches over the patient without direct touch for 15-45 minutes. Treatment is offered once daily for the duration of the hospital stay. Outpatient oncology clinic patients are offered home-based simple presence (no touch) massage therapy by a licensed massage therapist for 15-45 minutes once daily for 3 days. All patients are then randomized (a second time) to 1 of 2 treatment arms. * Arm I (caregiver massage therapy): Previously hospitalized patients are offered home-based caregiver massage therapy for 1 month. Outpatient oncology clinic patients are offered home-based caregiver massage therapy for 3 weeks. * Arm II (usual care): Patients receive usual care for symptom management. Hospitalized patients complete a questionnaire addressing symptoms, quality of life, satisfaction with symptom control, and time spent up or out of bed once daily on days 1-5, every 3 days while in the hospital, and then at 1 week, 2 weeks, and 1 month after discharge from the hospital. Outpatient oncology clinic patients complete a similar telephone questionnaire at baseline, 1 week, and then at 1 month. PROJECTED ACCRUAL: Approximately 100 patients will be accrued for this study.

Interventions

PROCEDUREmanagement of therapy complications
PROCEDUREmassage therapy
PROCEDUREpain therapy
PROCEDUREpsychosocial assessment and care
PROCEDUREquality-of-life assessment

Sponsors

National Cancer Institute (NCI)
CollaboratorNIH
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
DOUBLE (Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Intervention model description

The study was designed to assess the feasibility and effectiveness of massage for patients with cancer-related pain

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 120 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Solid cancer with evidence of metastases * Receiving treatment at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (BIDMC) * Must reside ≤ 25 miles from BIDMC

Exclusion criteria

* Patient to sick to be interviewed * Absence of severe symptoms * Participating in another trial * Language barrier * MD does not provide permission * Expired prior to consent process

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
PainFrom baseline to 1 week and from baseline to one month0=no pain to 10=most severe pain
AnxietyFrom baseline to 1 week and from baseline to 1 month0=no anxiety to 10=most severe anxiety
AlertnessFrom baseline to 1 week and from baseline to 1 month0=not at all alert to 10=most alert

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
SleepFrom baseline to 1 week and from baseline to 1 monthSleep (Richards-Campbell) 0 = best sleep to 50 = worst sleep
Quality of Life: Psychological Well-beingFrom baseline to 1 week and from baseline to 1 monthPsychological well-being over past 2 days (depressed, nervous/worried, sad, terrified of future) (0= always/extremely to 10= never/not at all; in other words: 0=negative/worst to 10= positive/best)
Quality of Life: McGill TotalFrom baseline to 1 week and from baseline to 1 monthQuality of Life (McGill Total); Mean of five sub-measures (but not overall) (0 = negative to 10 = positive)
Quality of Life: Physical Well-beingFrom baseline to 1 week and from baseline to 1 monthPhysical well-being over past 2 days (0= physically terrible to 10= physically well)

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Using oncology clinic electronic database, eligible patients were selected based on their clinical diagnosis (solid cancer with evidence of metastases) and whether they lived within 25 miles of the hospital. Patients were told that the authors were conducting a study of nonpharmacologic treatments intended to improve symptom management.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Massage
Patients received 3 massage therapy visits from massage therapists in initial week with a duration of 15-45 minutes.NOTE: Intervention 'management of therapy complications' has not been included in any Arm/Group Descriptions. Patients were intended to receive pain therapy, psychosocial assessment and care, and quality-of-life assessment management of therapy complications massage therapy pain therapy psychosocial assessment and care quality-of-life assessment
20
No-touch Control
Patients received 3 no-touch therapy visits from massage therapists who provided no-touch without healing intention.Patients were intended to receive pain therapy, psychosocial assessment and care, and quality-of-life assessment management of therapy complications massage therapy pain therapy psychosocial assessment and care quality-of-life assessment
10
Usual Care
Patients did not receive visits from massage therapists. Patients were intended to receive pain therapy, psychosocial assessment and care, and quality-of-life assessment
9
Total39

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicNo-touch ControlMassageUsual CareTotal
Age, Continuous54.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10
54.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12
55.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9
55.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11
Education: College grad or more6 Participants10 Participants5 Participants21 Participants
Employment: full-time or part-time5 Participants5 Participants4 Participants14 Participants
Household income: Not available/refused/don't know, <$50,000, >$50,000
<$50,000
2 Participants4 Participants1 Participants7 Participants
Household income: Not available/refused/don't know, <$50,000, >$50,000
>$50,000
5 Participants13 Participants7 Participants25 Participants
Household income: Not available/refused/don't know, <$50,000, >$50,000
Not available/refused/Don't know
3 Participants3 Participants1 Participants7 Participants
Living alone2 Participants3 Participants0 Participants5 Participants
Marital status: Married, Other
Married
6 Participants13 Participants8 Participants27 Participants
Marital status: Married, Other
Other
4 Participants7 Participants1 Participants12 Participants
Not admitted to hospital in the last 12 months6 Participants8 Participants4 Participants18 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Hispanic
1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
9 Participants19 Participants8 Participants36 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
9 Participants17 Participants6 Participants32 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
1 Participants3 Participants3 Participants7 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 200 / 101 / 9
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 200 / 100 / 9
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 200 / 100 / 9

Outcome results

Primary

Alertness

0=not at all alert to 10=most alert

Time frame: From baseline to 1 week and from baseline to 1 month

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
MassageAlertness1 week0 units on a scale
MassageAlertness1 month0 units on a scale
No-touch ControlAlertness1 week0 units on a scale
No-touch ControlAlertness1 month0 units on a scale
Usual CareAlertness1 week1 units on a scale
Usual CareAlertness1 month0 units on a scale
Primary

Anxiety

0=no anxiety to 10=most severe anxiety

Time frame: From baseline to 1 week and from baseline to 1 month

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
MassageAnxiety1 week0 units on a scale
MassageAnxiety1 month0 units on a scale
No-touch ControlAnxiety1 week0 units on a scale
No-touch ControlAnxiety1 month0 units on a scale
Usual CareAnxiety1 week0 units on a scale
Usual CareAnxiety1 month0 units on a scale
Primary

Pain

0=no pain to 10=most severe pain

Time frame: From baseline to 1 week and from baseline to one month

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
MassagePain1 week0 units on a scale
MassagePain1 month0 units on a scale
No-touch ControlPain1 week0 units on a scale
No-touch ControlPain1 month0 units on a scale
Usual CarePain1 week0 units on a scale
Usual CarePain1 month-2 units on a scale
Secondary

Quality of Life: McGill Total

Quality of Life (McGill Total); Mean of five sub-measures (but not overall) (0 = negative to 10 = positive)

Time frame: From baseline to 1 week and from baseline to 1 month

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
MassageQuality of Life: McGill Total1 week0.45 units on a scale
MassageQuality of Life: McGill Total1 month0 units on a scale
No-touch ControlQuality of Life: McGill Total1 week0 units on a scale
No-touch ControlQuality of Life: McGill Total1 month-0.18 units on a scale
Usual CareQuality of Life: McGill Total1 week0 units on a scale
Usual CareQuality of Life: McGill Total1 month0 units on a scale
Secondary

Quality of Life: Physical Well-being

Physical well-being over past 2 days (0= physically terrible to 10= physically well)

Time frame: From baseline to 1 week and from baseline to 1 month

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
MassageQuality of Life: Physical Well-being1 week1 units on a scale
MassageQuality of Life: Physical Well-being1 month0 units on a scale
No-touch ControlQuality of Life: Physical Well-being1 week-0.5 units on a scale
No-touch ControlQuality of Life: Physical Well-being1 month0 units on a scale
Usual CareQuality of Life: Physical Well-being1 week0 units on a scale
Usual CareQuality of Life: Physical Well-being1 month0 units on a scale
Secondary

Quality of Life: Psychological Well-being

Psychological well-being over past 2 days (depressed, nervous/worried, sad, terrified of future) (0= always/extremely to 10= never/not at all; in other words: 0=negative/worst to 10= positive/best)

Time frame: From baseline to 1 week and from baseline to 1 month

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
MassageQuality of Life: Psychological Well-being1 week1.125 units on a scale
MassageQuality of Life: Psychological Well-being1 month-0.125 units on a scale
No-touch ControlQuality of Life: Psychological Well-being1 week0.25 units on a scale
No-touch ControlQuality of Life: Psychological Well-being1 month0.25 units on a scale
Usual CareQuality of Life: Psychological Well-being1 week0 units on a scale
Usual CareQuality of Life: Psychological Well-being1 month0.75 units on a scale
Secondary

Sleep

Sleep (Richards-Campbell) 0 = best sleep to 50 = worst sleep

Time frame: From baseline to 1 week and from baseline to 1 month

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
MassageSleep1 week-3.5 units on a scale
MassageSleep1 month-4 units on a scale
No-touch ControlSleep1 week0 units on a scale
No-touch ControlSleep1 month0 units on a scale
Usual CareSleep1 week-0.5 units on a scale
Usual CareSleep1 month0 units on a scale

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026