Skip to content

Efficacy and Safety of Dexlansoprazole MR and Lansoprazole on Healing of Erosive Esophagitis

A Phase 3 Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of TAK-390MR (60 mg Once-daily [QD] and 90 mg QD) and an Active Comparator, Lansoprazole (30 mg QD) on Healing of Erosive Esophagitis

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00251719
Enrollment
2054
Registered
2005-11-10
Start date
2005-12-31
Completion date
2007-01-31
Last updated
2012-02-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Esophagitis, Peptic, Esophagitis, Reflux

Keywords

Erosive Esophagitis

Brief summary

This is a study to assess the efficacy and safety of 8 weeks of treatment with Dexlansoprazole modified release (MR)(60 mg daily and 90 mg daily) compared to Lansoprazole (30 mg daily) in healing subjects with endoscopically proven erosive esophagitis.

Detailed description

This is a Phase 3, randomized, double-blind, multi-center, active-controlled, 3-arm study with an 8 week treatment period. This study will compare the efficacy of Dexlansoprazole MR (60 mg and 90 mg) with that of Lansoprazole (30 mg) when administered orally as a single daily dose in the morning, before breakfast. The study is designed to evaluate healing of erosive esophagitis and the effect of the therapy on relieving gastroesophageal reflux disease related symptoms. The study consists of two periods, a screening period (maximum 21 days) and a treatment period, which will last up to 8 weeks.

Interventions

Dexlansoprazole MR 60 mg, capsules, orally, once daily (QD) for up to 8 weeks.

DRUGLansoprazole

Lansoprazole 30 mg, capsules, orally, once daily for up to 8 weeks.

Sponsors

Takeda
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Subject must have endoscopically confirmed erosive esophagitis as defined by the Los Angeles (LA) Classification Grading System (A-D).

Exclusion criteria

* Subject has a positive Campylobacter-like organisms (CLO) test for Helicobacter (H.) pylori. * Use of prescription or non-prescription proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), histamine (H2) receptor antagonists or sucralfate, drugs with significant anticholinergic effects, misoprostol or prokinetics * Use of antacids \[except for study supplied Gelusil®\] * Need for continuous anticoagulant therapy (Blood Thinners) * Endoscopic Barrett's esophagus and/or definite dysplastic changes in the esophagus * History of dilatation of esophageal strictures, other than Schatzki's ring (a ring of mucosal tissue near the lower esophageal sphincter) * Current or historical evidence of Zollinger-Ellison syndrome or other hypersecretory condition * History of gastric, duodenal or esophageal surgery except simple oversew of an ulcer * Acute upper gastrointestinal (UGI) hemorrhage within 4 weeks of the Screening endoscopy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Subjects With Complete Healing of Erosive Esophagitis by Week 8 as Assessed by Endoscopy - Crude Rate Analysis.8 WeeksPercentage of subjects with complete healing of EE as assessed by endoscopy. Change in LA Esophagitis Classification grades A, B, C, D to healed was measured. Healed is defined as anything that is less than the criterion for Grade A (greater than or equal to 1 mucosal break and less than 5 mm). If it doesn't meet the A criterion, it's counted as healed.
Percentage of Subjects With Complete Healing of Erosive Esophagitis by Week 8 as Assessed by Endoscopy - Life Table Method8 WeeksPercentage of subjects with complete healing of EE as assessed by endoscopy. Change in LA Esophagitis Classification grades A, B, C, D to healed was measured. Healed is defined as anything that is less than the criterion for Grade A. If it doesn't meet the A criterion, it's counted as healed.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Subjects With Baseline Erosive Esophagitis Grade C or D Combined Who Have Complete Healing of Erosive Esophagitis by Week 8 as Assessed by Endoscopy - Crude Rate Analysis.Week 8Percentage of subjects with baseline EE grade C or D combined who have complete healing of EE as assessed by endoscopy. Change in LA Classification grades C or D to healed was measured. Healed is defined as anything that is less than the criterion for Grade A. If it doesn't meet the A criterion, it's counted as healed.
Percentage of Subjects With Baseline Erosive Esophagitis Grade C or D Combined Who Have Complete Healing of Erosive Esophagitis by Week 8 as Assessed by Endoscopy - Life Table Method.8 WeeksPercentage of subjects with baseline EE grade C or D combined who have complete healing of EE as assessed by endoscopy. Change in LA Esophagitis Classification grades C or D to healed was measured. Healed is defined as anything that is less than the criterion for Grade A. If it doesn't meet the A criterion, it's counted as healed.
Percentage of Subjects With Complete Healing of Erosive Esophagitis by Week 4 as Assessed by Endoscopy - Crude Rate Analysis.4 WeeksPercentage of subjects with complete healing of EE as assessed by endoscopy. Change in LA Esophagitis Classification grades A, B, C, D to healed was measured. Healed is defined as anything that is less than the criterion for Grade A. If it doesn't meet the A criterion, it's counted as healed.
Percentage of Subjects With Complete Healing of Erosive Esophagitis by Week 4 as Assessed by Endoscopy - Life Table Method4 WeeksPercentage of subjects with complete healing of EE as assessed by endoscopy. Change in LA Esophagitis Classification grades A, B, C, D to healed was measured. Healed is defined as anything that is less than the criterion for Grade A. If it doesn't meet the A criterion, it's counted as healed.

Countries

Australia, Bulgaria, Canada, Colombia, Czechia, Germany, India, Latvia, Lithuania, New Zealand, Peru, Poland, Russia, Slovakia, South Africa, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Subjects were enrolled at 93 sites in the US and 63 ex-US sites from 16 December 2005 to 22 January 2007.

Pre-assignment details

Subjects recorded day and nighttime heartburn symptoms and rescue medications for a screening period of up to 21 days. Subjects with endoscopically-proven erosive esophagitis (EE) at screening were enrolled in Dexlansoprazole Modified Release (MR) or Lansoprazole once daily (QD) treatment group.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Dexlansoprazole MR 60 mg QD
Dexlansoprazole MR 60 mg, capsules, orally, once daily for up to 8 weeks.
694
Dexlansoprazole MR 90 mg QD
Dexlansoprazole MR 90 mg, capsules, orally, once daily for up to 8 weeks.
687
Lansoprazole 30 mg QD
Lansoprazole 30 mg, capsules, orally, once daily for up to 8 weeks.
673
Total2,054

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Overall StudyAdverse Event1487
Overall StudyBarrett's esophagus220
Overall StudyInclusion/exclusion criteria not met1262
Overall StudyInvestigator decision110
Overall StudyLack of Efficacy210
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up5118
Overall StudyNoncompliance231
Overall StudyProtocol Violation111
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject141211

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotalLansoprazole 30 mg QDDexlansoprazole MR 90 mg QDDexlansoprazole MR 60 mg QD
Age Continuous47.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.66
47.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.65
47.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.8
48.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.53
Age, Customized
< 45 Years
842 participants294 participants293 participants255 participants
Age, Customized
45 Years to < 65 Years
972 participants314 participants310 participants348 participants
Age, Customized
>= 65 Years
240 participants65 participants84 participants91 participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
192 Participants58 Participants67 Participants67 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
1862 Participants615 Participants620 Participants627 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
LA Classification Grade
A: ≥1 mucosal break <5 mm
727 participant222 participant271 participant234 participant
LA Classification Grade
B: ≥1 mucosal break ≥5 mm
735 participant257 participant221 participant257 participant
LA Classification Grade
C: ≥1 mucosal break and <75% of the circumference
458 participant150 participant152 participant156 participant
LA Classification Grade
D: ≥1 mucosal break and ≥75% of the circumference
132 participant44 participant42 participant46 participant
LA Classification Grade
NA
2 participant0 participant1 participant1 participant
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
25 Participants7 Participants12 Participants6 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
90 Participants25 Participants32 Participants33 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
96 Participants32 Participants30 Participants34 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
68 Participants24 Participants23 Participants21 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
2 Participants0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
3 Participants1 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
1770 Participants584 Participants588 Participants598 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
963 Participants311 Participants335 Participants317 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
1091 Participants362 Participants352 Participants377 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
30 / 69431 / 68723 / 673
serious
Total, serious adverse events
4 / 6944 / 6872 / 673

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Subjects With Complete Healing of Erosive Esophagitis by Week 8 as Assessed by Endoscopy - Crude Rate Analysis.

Percentage of subjects with complete healing of EE as assessed by endoscopy. Change in LA Esophagitis Classification grades A, B, C, D to healed was measured. Healed is defined as anything that is less than the criterion for Grade A (greater than or equal to 1 mucosal break and less than 5 mm). If it doesn't meet the A criterion, it's counted as healed.

Time frame: 8 Weeks

Population: Crude rate analysis were performed on the ITT subjects who had at least 1 post-baseline endoscopy assessment that was performed within 7 days of the last day of study drug.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Dexlansoprazole MR 60 mg QDPercentage of Subjects With Complete Healing of Erosive Esophagitis by Week 8 as Assessed by Endoscopy - Crude Rate Analysis.86.9 percentage of subjects
Dexlansoprazole MR 90 mg QDPercentage of Subjects With Complete Healing of Erosive Esophagitis by Week 8 as Assessed by Endoscopy - Crude Rate Analysis.89.4 percentage of subjects
Lansoprazole 30 mg QDPercentage of Subjects With Complete Healing of Erosive Esophagitis by Week 8 as Assessed by Endoscopy - Crude Rate Analysis.84.6 percentage of subjects
p-value: 0.23495% CI: [-1.45, 6.14]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
p-value: 0.01995% CI: [1.2, 8.5]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
p-value: 0.22Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Primary

Percentage of Subjects With Complete Healing of Erosive Esophagitis by Week 8 as Assessed by Endoscopy - Life Table Method

Percentage of subjects with complete healing of EE as assessed by endoscopy. Change in LA Esophagitis Classification grades A, B, C, D to healed was measured. Healed is defined as anything that is less than the criterion for Grade A. If it doesn't meet the A criterion, it's counted as healed.

Time frame: 8 Weeks

Population: In addition to the ITT subjects who had at least 1 post-baseline endoscopy, Life Table Method included the ITT subjects without any post-baseline endoscopy within 7 days of the last day of study drug as censored.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Dexlansoprazole MR 60 mg QDPercentage of Subjects With Complete Healing of Erosive Esophagitis by Week 8 as Assessed by Endoscopy - Life Table Method93.1 percentage of subjects
Dexlansoprazole MR 90 mg QDPercentage of Subjects With Complete Healing of Erosive Esophagitis by Week 8 as Assessed by Endoscopy - Life Table Method94.9 percentage of subjects
Lansoprazole 30 mg QDPercentage of Subjects With Complete Healing of Erosive Esophagitis by Week 8 as Assessed by Endoscopy - Life Table Method91.5 percentage of subjects
p-value: 0.16795% CI: [-1.65, 4.96]Log Rank
p-value: 0.0395% CI: [0.27, 6.5]Log Rank
p-value: 0.413Log Rank
Secondary

Percentage of Subjects With Baseline Erosive Esophagitis Grade C or D Combined Who Have Complete Healing of Erosive Esophagitis by Week 8 as Assessed by Endoscopy - Crude Rate Analysis.

Percentage of subjects with baseline EE grade C or D combined who have complete healing of EE as assessed by endoscopy. Change in LA Classification grades C or D to healed was measured. Healed is defined as anything that is less than the criterion for Grade A. If it doesn't meet the A criterion, it's counted as healed.

Time frame: Week 8

Population: Crude rate analyses were performed on the ITT subjects who had at least 1 post-baseline endoscopy assessment performed within 7 days of the last day of study drug.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Dexlansoprazole MR 60 mg QDPercentage of Subjects With Baseline Erosive Esophagitis Grade C or D Combined Who Have Complete Healing of Erosive Esophagitis by Week 8 as Assessed by Endoscopy - Crude Rate Analysis.77.8 percentage of subjects
Dexlansoprazole MR 90 mg QDPercentage of Subjects With Baseline Erosive Esophagitis Grade C or D Combined Who Have Complete Healing of Erosive Esophagitis by Week 8 as Assessed by Endoscopy - Crude Rate Analysis.86.3 percentage of subjects
Lansoprazole 30 mg QDPercentage of Subjects With Baseline Erosive Esophagitis Grade C or D Combined Who Have Complete Healing of Erosive Esophagitis by Week 8 as Assessed by Endoscopy - Crude Rate Analysis.78.9 percentage of subjects
p-value: 0.768Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
p-value: 0.064Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
p-value: 0.034Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Percentage of Subjects With Baseline Erosive Esophagitis Grade C or D Combined Who Have Complete Healing of Erosive Esophagitis by Week 8 as Assessed by Endoscopy - Life Table Method.

Percentage of subjects with baseline EE grade C or D combined who have complete healing of EE as assessed by endoscopy. Change in LA Esophagitis Classification grades C or D to healed was measured. Healed is defined as anything that is less than the criterion for Grade A. If it doesn't meet the A criterion, it's counted as healed.

Time frame: 8 Weeks

Population: In addition to the ITT subjects who had at least 1 post-baseline endoscopy, Life Table Method included the ITT subjects without any post-baseline endoscopy within 7 days of the last day of study drug as censored.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Dexlansoprazole MR 60 mg QDPercentage of Subjects With Baseline Erosive Esophagitis Grade C or D Combined Who Have Complete Healing of Erosive Esophagitis by Week 8 as Assessed by Endoscopy - Life Table Method.87.6 percentage of subjects
Dexlansoprazole MR 90 mg QDPercentage of Subjects With Baseline Erosive Esophagitis Grade C or D Combined Who Have Complete Healing of Erosive Esophagitis by Week 8 as Assessed by Endoscopy - Life Table Method.93.3 percentage of subjects
Lansoprazole 30 mg QDPercentage of Subjects With Baseline Erosive Esophagitis Grade C or D Combined Who Have Complete Healing of Erosive Esophagitis by Week 8 as Assessed by Endoscopy - Life Table Method.87.7 percentage of subjects
p-value: 0.727Log Rank
p-value: 0.064Log Rank
p-value: 0.174Log Rank
Secondary

Percentage of Subjects With Complete Healing of Erosive Esophagitis by Week 4 as Assessed by Endoscopy - Crude Rate Analysis.

Percentage of subjects with complete healing of EE as assessed by endoscopy. Change in LA Esophagitis Classification grades A, B, C, D to healed was measured. Healed is defined as anything that is less than the criterion for Grade A. If it doesn't meet the A criterion, it's counted as healed.

Time frame: 4 Weeks

Population: Crude rate analyses were performed on the ITT subjects who had at least 1 post-baseline endoscopy assessment performed within 7 days of the last day of study drug.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Dexlansoprazole MR 60 mg QDPercentage of Subjects With Complete Healing of Erosive Esophagitis by Week 4 as Assessed by Endoscopy - Crude Rate Analysis.69.7 percentage of subjects
Dexlansoprazole MR 90 mg QDPercentage of Subjects With Complete Healing of Erosive Esophagitis by Week 4 as Assessed by Endoscopy - Crude Rate Analysis.70.6 percentage of subjects
Lansoprazole 30 mg QDPercentage of Subjects With Complete Healing of Erosive Esophagitis by Week 4 as Assessed by Endoscopy - Crude Rate Analysis.65.4 percentage of subjects
p-value: 0.1Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
p-value: 0.125Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
p-value: 0.993Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Percentage of Subjects With Complete Healing of Erosive Esophagitis by Week 4 as Assessed by Endoscopy - Life Table Method

Percentage of subjects with complete healing of EE as assessed by endoscopy. Change in LA Esophagitis Classification grades A, B, C, D to healed was measured. Healed is defined as anything that is less than the criterion for Grade A. If it doesn't meet the A criterion, it's counted as healed.

Time frame: 4 Weeks

Population: In addition to the ITT subjects who had at least 1 post-baseline endoscopy, Life Table Method included the ITT subjects without any post-baseline endoscopy within 7 days of the last day of study drug as censored.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Dexlansoprazole MR 60 mg QDPercentage of Subjects With Complete Healing of Erosive Esophagitis by Week 4 as Assessed by Endoscopy - Life Table Method80.1 percentage of subjects
Dexlansoprazole MR 90 mg QDPercentage of Subjects With Complete Healing of Erosive Esophagitis by Week 4 as Assessed by Endoscopy - Life Table Method80.4 percentage of subjects
Lansoprazole 30 mg QDPercentage of Subjects With Complete Healing of Erosive Esophagitis by Week 4 as Assessed by Endoscopy - Life Table Method77.0 percentage of subjects
p-value: 0.117Log Rank
p-value: 0.124Log Rank
p-value: 0.949Log Rank

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026