Skip to content

Efficacy and Safety of Dexlansoprazole MR and Lansoprazole on Healing of Erosive Esophagitis

A Phase 3 Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of TAK-390MR (60 mg Once- Daily [QD] and 90 mg QD) and an Active Comparator, Lansoprazole (30 mg QD) on Healing of Erosive Esophagitis

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00251693
Enrollment
2038
Registered
2005-11-10
Start date
2005-12-31
Completion date
2007-01-31
Last updated
2012-02-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Esophagitis, Peptic, Esophagitis, Reflux

Keywords

Erosive Esophagitis

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy and safety of 8 weeks of once-daily (QD) treatment with dexlansoprazole modified release (MR) 60 mg or 90 mg or lansoprazole 30 mg in healing subjects with endoscopically proven erosive esophagitis.

Detailed description

This is a Phase 3, randomized, double-blind, multi-center, active-controlled, 3-arm study with an 8-week treatment period. This study will compare the efficacy of dexlansoprazole MR (60 mg QD and 90 mg QD) with that of lansoprazole (30 mg) when administered orally as a single daily dose in the morning, before breakfast. The study is designed to evaluate healing of erosive esophagitis and the effect of the therapy on relieving gastroesophageal reflux disease-related symptoms. The study consists of two periods, a screening period (maximum 21 days) and a treatment period, which will last 8 weeks.

Interventions

Dexlansoprazole MR 60 mg, capsules, orally, once daily (QD) for up to 8 weeks.

DRUGLansoprazole

Lansoprazole 30 mg, capsules, orally, once daily for up to 8 weeks.

Sponsors

Takeda
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Subject must have endoscopically confirmed erosive esophagitis as defined by the Los Angeles (LA) Classification Grading System (A-D)

Exclusion criteria

* Subject has a positive Campylobacter-like organisms (CLO) test for Helicobacter (H.) pylori. * Use of prescription or non-prescription proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), histamine (H2) receptor antagonists or sucralfate, drugs with significant anticholinergic effects, misoprostol or prokinetics * Use of antacids \[except for study supplied Gelusil®\] * Need for continuous anticoagulant therapy (blood thinners) * Endoscopic Barrett's esophagus and/or definite dysplastic changes in the esophagus * History of dilatation of esophageal strictures, other than Schatzki's ring (a ring of mucosal tissue near the lower esophageal sphincter) * Current or historical evidence of Zollinger-Ellison syndrome or other hypersecretory condition. * History of gastric, duodenal or esophageal surgery except simple oversew of an ulcer. * Acute upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage within 4 weeks of the screening endoscopy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Subjects With Complete Healing of Erosive Esophagitis (EE) by Week 8 as Assessed by Endoscopy - Crude Rate Analysis.8 WeeksPercentage of subjects with complete healing of EE as assessed by endoscopy was analyzed for change in LA Esophagitis Classification grades A, B, C, or D to healed. Healed is defined as anything that is less than the criterion for Grade A (greater than or equal to 1 mucosal break and less than 5 mm). If it doesn't meet the A criterion, it's counted as healed.
Percentage of Subjects With Complete Healing of Erosive Esophagitis by Week 8 as Assessed by Endoscopy - Life Table Method.8 weeksPercentage of subjects with complete healing of EE as assessed by endoscopy was analyzed for change in LA Esophagitis Classification grades A, B, C, or D to healed. Healed is defined as anything that is less than the criterion for Grade A. If it doesn't meet the A criterion, it's counted as healed.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Subjects With Baseline Erosive Esophagitis Grade C or D Combined Who Have Complete Healing of Erosive Esophagitis by Week 8 as Assessed by Endoscopy - Crude Rate Analysis.8 WeeksPercentage of subjects with baseline EE grade C or D combined who have complete healing of erosive esophagitis as assessed by endoscopy for Change in LA Esophagitis Classification Grades C and D to healed. Healed is defined as anything that is less than the criterion for Grade A. If it doesn't meet the A criterion, it's counted as healed.
Percentage of Subjects With Baseline Erosive Esophagitis Grade C or D Combined Who Have Complete Healing of Erosive Esophagitis by Week 8 as Assessed by Endoscopy - Life Table Method.8 WeeksPercentage of subjects with baseline EE grade C or D combined who have complete healing of EE as assessed by endoscopy for Change in LA Esophagitis Classification Grades C and D to healed. Healed is defined as anything that is less than the criterion for Grade A. If it doesn't meet the A criterion, it's counted as healed.
Percentage of Subjects With Complete Healing of Erosive Esophagitis by Week 4 as Assessed by Endoscopy - Crude Rate Analyses.4 WeeksPercentage of subjects with complete healing of EE as assessed by endoscopy was analyzed for change in LA Esophagitis Classification grades A, B, C, or D to healed. Healed is defined as anything that is less than the criterion for Grade A. If it doesn't meet the A criterion, it's counted as healed.
Percentage of Subjects With Complete Healing of Erosive Esophagitis by Week 4 as Assessed by Endoscopy - Life Table Method.4 WeeksPercentage of subjects with complete healing of EE as assessed by endoscopy was analyzed for change in LA Esophagitis Classification grades A, B, C, or D to healed. Healed is defined as anything that is less than the criterion for Grade A. If it doesn't meet the A criterion, it's counted as healed.

Countries

Australia, Bulgaria, Canada, Czechia, Germany, Hungary, India, Latvia, Lithuania, New Zealand, Peru, Poland, Slovakia, South Africa, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Subjects were enrolled at 95 sites in the United States (US) and 55 ex-US sites from 02 December 2005 to 30 January 2007.

Pre-assignment details

Subjects recorded day and nighttime heartburn symptoms and rescue medications for a screening period of up to 21 days. Subjects with endoscopically-proven erosive esophagitis (EE) at screening were enrolled in Dexlansoprazole Modified Release (MR) or Lansoprazole once daily (QD) treatment group.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Dexlansoprazole MR 60 mg QD
Dexlansoprazole MR 60 mg, capsules, orally, once daily for up to 8 weeks.
680
Dexlansoprazole MR 90 mg QD
Dexlansoprazole MR 90 mg, capsules, orally, once daily for up to 8 weeks.
668
Lansoprazole 30 mg QD
Lansoprazole 30 mg, capsules, orally, once daily for up to 8 weeks.
690
Total2,038

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Overall StudyAbnormal laboratory findings001
Overall StudyAdverse Event1799
Overall StudyInclusion/exclusion criteria not met538
Overall StudyLack of Efficacy010
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up1278
Overall StudyNoncompliant002
Overall StudyPossible Barrett's esophagus352
Overall StudyProtocol Violation202
Overall StudySubject request/subject unavailable120
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject111714

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotalLansoprazole 30 mg QDDexlansoprazole MR 90 mg QDDexlansoprazole MR 60 mg QD
Age Continuous47.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.79
47.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.74
47.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.93
47.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.71
Age, Customized
<45 Years
833 participants288 participants276 participants269 participants
Age, Customized
45 Years to <65 Years
1009 participants332 participants328 participants349 participants
Age, Customized
>=65 Years
196 participants70 participants64 participants62 participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
166 Participants54 Participants52 Participants60 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
1872 Participants636 Participants616 Participants620 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Los Angeles (LA) Classification Grade for Erosive Esophagitis (EE)
A: ≥1 mucosal break <5mm
709 Paricipants231 Paricipants242 Paricipants236 Paricipants
Los Angeles (LA) Classification Grade for Erosive Esophagitis (EE)
B: ≥1 mucosal break ≥5mm
728 Paricipants248 Paricipants233 Paricipants247 Paricipants
Los Angeles (LA) Classification Grade for Erosive Esophagitis (EE)
C: ≥1 mucosal break and <75% of the circumference
481 Paricipants170 Paricipants148 Paricipants163 Paricipants
Los Angeles (LA) Classification Grade for Erosive Esophagitis (EE)
D: ≥1 mucosal break and ≥75% of the circumference
118 Paricipants40 Paricipants45 Paricipants33 Paricipants
Los Angeles (LA) Classification Grade for Erosive Esophagitis (EE)
Not Applicable
2 Paricipants1 Paricipants0 Paricipants1 Paricipants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
17 Participants7 Participants4 Participants6 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
93 Participants33 Participants33 Participants27 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
92 Participants27 Participants33 Participants32 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
42 Participants17 Participants15 Participants10 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
2 Participants1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
9 Participants4 Participants3 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
1783 Participants601 Participants580 Participants602 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
927 Participants325 Participants302 Participants300 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
1111 Participants365 Participants366 Participants380 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
63 / 68053 / 66850 / 690
serious
Total, serious adverse events
5 / 6802 / 6686 / 690

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Subjects With Complete Healing of Erosive Esophagitis by Week 8 as Assessed by Endoscopy - Life Table Method.

Percentage of subjects with complete healing of EE as assessed by endoscopy was analyzed for change in LA Esophagitis Classification grades A, B, C, or D to healed. Healed is defined as anything that is less than the criterion for Grade A. If it doesn't meet the A criterion, it's counted as healed.

Time frame: 8 weeks

Population: In addition to the ITT subjects who had at least 1 post-baseline endoscopy, Life Table Method included the ITT subjects without any post-baseline endoscopy within 7 days of the last day of study drug as censored.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Dexlansoprazole MR 60 mg QDPercentage of Subjects With Complete Healing of Erosive Esophagitis by Week 8 as Assessed by Endoscopy - Life Table Method.92.3 Percentage of subjects
Dexlansoprazole MR 90 mg QDPercentage of Subjects With Complete Healing of Erosive Esophagitis by Week 8 as Assessed by Endoscopy - Life Table Method.92.2 Percentage of subjects
Lansoprazole 30 mg QDPercentage of Subjects With Complete Healing of Erosive Esophagitis by Week 8 as Assessed by Endoscopy - Life Table Method.86.1 Percentage of subjects
p-value: 0.0695% CI: [2.3, 10.11]Log Rank
p-value: 0.02995% CI: [2.16, 10]Log Rank
p-value: 0.707Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Primary

Percentage of Subjects With Complete Healing of Erosive Esophagitis (EE) by Week 8 as Assessed by Endoscopy - Crude Rate Analysis.

Percentage of subjects with complete healing of EE as assessed by endoscopy was analyzed for change in LA Esophagitis Classification grades A, B, C, or D to healed. Healed is defined as anything that is less than the criterion for Grade A (greater than or equal to 1 mucosal break and less than 5 mm). If it doesn't meet the A criterion, it's counted as healed.

Time frame: 8 Weeks

Population: Crude rate analyses were performed on the ITT subjects who had at least 1 post-baseline endoscopy assessment performed within 7 days of the last day of study drug.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Dexlansoprazole MR 60 mg QDPercentage of Subjects With Complete Healing of Erosive Esophagitis (EE) by Week 8 as Assessed by Endoscopy - Crude Rate Analysis.85.3 Percentage of subjects
Dexlansoprazole MR 90 mg QDPercentage of Subjects With Complete Healing of Erosive Esophagitis (EE) by Week 8 as Assessed by Endoscopy - Crude Rate Analysis.85.8 Percentage of subjects
Lansoprazole 30 mg QDPercentage of Subjects With Complete Healing of Erosive Esophagitis (EE) by Week 8 as Assessed by Endoscopy - Crude Rate Analysis.79.0 Percentage of subjects
p-value: 0.00495% CI: [2.17, 10.48]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
p-value: 0.00195% CI: [2.7, 10.98]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
p-value: 0.727Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Percentage of Subjects With Baseline Erosive Esophagitis Grade C or D Combined Who Have Complete Healing of Erosive Esophagitis by Week 8 as Assessed by Endoscopy - Crude Rate Analysis.

Percentage of subjects with baseline EE grade C or D combined who have complete healing of erosive esophagitis as assessed by endoscopy for Change in LA Esophagitis Classification Grades C and D to healed. Healed is defined as anything that is less than the criterion for Grade A. If it doesn't meet the A criterion, it's counted as healed.

Time frame: 8 Weeks

Population: Crude rate analyses were performed on the ITT subjects who had at least 1 post-baseline endoscopy assessment performed within 7 days of the last day of study drug.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Dexlansoprazole MR 60 mg QDPercentage of Subjects With Baseline Erosive Esophagitis Grade C or D Combined Who Have Complete Healing of Erosive Esophagitis by Week 8 as Assessed by Endoscopy - Crude Rate Analysis.79.7 percentage of subjects
Dexlansoprazole MR 90 mg QDPercentage of Subjects With Baseline Erosive Esophagitis Grade C or D Combined Who Have Complete Healing of Erosive Esophagitis by Week 8 as Assessed by Endoscopy - Crude Rate Analysis.74.1 percentage of subjects
Lansoprazole 30 mg QDPercentage of Subjects With Baseline Erosive Esophagitis Grade C or D Combined Who Have Complete Healing of Erosive Esophagitis by Week 8 as Assessed by Endoscopy - Crude Rate Analysis.65.0 percentage of subjects
p-value: 0.002Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
p-value: 0.045Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
p-value: 0.245Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Percentage of Subjects With Baseline Erosive Esophagitis Grade C or D Combined Who Have Complete Healing of Erosive Esophagitis by Week 8 as Assessed by Endoscopy - Life Table Method.

Percentage of subjects with baseline EE grade C or D combined who have complete healing of EE as assessed by endoscopy for Change in LA Esophagitis Classification Grades C and D to healed. Healed is defined as anything that is less than the criterion for Grade A. If it doesn't meet the A criterion, it's counted as healed.

Time frame: 8 Weeks

Population: In addition to the ITT subjects who had at least 1 post-baseline endoscopy, Life Table Method included the ITT subjects without any post-baseline endoscopy within 7 days of the last day of study drug as censored.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Dexlansoprazole MR 60 mg QDPercentage of Subjects With Baseline Erosive Esophagitis Grade C or D Combined Who Have Complete Healing of Erosive Esophagitis by Week 8 as Assessed by Endoscopy - Life Table Method.88.9 percentage of subjects
Dexlansoprazole MR 90 mg QDPercentage of Subjects With Baseline Erosive Esophagitis Grade C or D Combined Who Have Complete Healing of Erosive Esophagitis by Week 8 as Assessed by Endoscopy - Life Table Method.83.8 percentage of subjects
Lansoprazole 30 mg QDPercentage of Subjects With Baseline Erosive Esophagitis Grade C or D Combined Who Have Complete Healing of Erosive Esophagitis by Week 8 as Assessed by Endoscopy - Life Table Method.74.5 percentage of subjects
p-value: 0.011Log Rank
p-value: 0.017Log Rank
p-value: 0.927Log Rank
Secondary

Percentage of Subjects With Complete Healing of Erosive Esophagitis by Week 4 as Assessed by Endoscopy - Crude Rate Analyses.

Percentage of subjects with complete healing of EE as assessed by endoscopy was analyzed for change in LA Esophagitis Classification grades A, B, C, or D to healed. Healed is defined as anything that is less than the criterion for Grade A. If it doesn't meet the A criterion, it's counted as healed.

Time frame: 4 Weeks

Population: Crude rate analyses were performed on the ITT subjects who had at least 1 post-baseline endoscopy assessment performed within 7 days of the last day of study drug.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Dexlansoprazole MR 60 mg QDPercentage of Subjects With Complete Healing of Erosive Esophagitis by Week 4 as Assessed by Endoscopy - Crude Rate Analyses.66.2 Percentage of subjects
Dexlansoprazole MR 90 mg QDPercentage of Subjects With Complete Healing of Erosive Esophagitis by Week 4 as Assessed by Endoscopy - Crude Rate Analyses.68.8 Percentage of subjects
Lansoprazole 30 mg QDPercentage of Subjects With Complete Healing of Erosive Esophagitis by Week 4 as Assessed by Endoscopy - Crude Rate Analyses.64.8 Percentage of subjects
p-value: 0.705Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
p-value: 0.146Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
p-value: 0.283Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Percentage of Subjects With Complete Healing of Erosive Esophagitis by Week 4 as Assessed by Endoscopy - Life Table Method.

Percentage of subjects with complete healing of EE as assessed by endoscopy was analyzed for change in LA Esophagitis Classification grades A, B, C, or D to healed. Healed is defined as anything that is less than the criterion for Grade A. If it doesn't meet the A criterion, it's counted as healed.

Time frame: 4 Weeks

Population: In addition to the ITT subjects who had at least 1 post-baseline endoscopy, Life Table Method included the ITT subjects without any post-baseline endoscopy within 7 days of the last day of study drug as censored.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Dexlansoprazole MR 60 mg QDPercentage of Subjects With Complete Healing of Erosive Esophagitis by Week 4 as Assessed by Endoscopy - Life Table Method.77.0 Percentage of subjects
Dexlansoprazole MR 90 mg QDPercentage of Subjects With Complete Healing of Erosive Esophagitis by Week 4 as Assessed by Endoscopy - Life Table Method.78.8 Percentage of subjects
Lansoprazole 30 mg QDPercentage of Subjects With Complete Healing of Erosive Esophagitis by Week 4 as Assessed by Endoscopy - Life Table Method.76.5 Percentage of subjects
p-value: 0.896Log Rank
p-value: 0.241Log Rank
p-value: 0.211Log Rank

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026