Skip to content

Spinal Anesthesia With Articaine and Lidocaine for Outpatient Surgery.

Spinal Anesthesia With Articaine and Lidocaine for Outpatient Surgery: A Double Blind Randomized Clinical Trial.

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00247741
Enrollment
80
Registered
2005-11-02
Start date
2005-11-30
Completion date
2006-05-31
Last updated
2013-12-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Spinal Anesthesia

Keywords

spinal anesthesia, lidocaine, articaine, intrathecal

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to compare two short-acting local anesthetics, articaine and lidocaine, for spinal anesthesia in day-case surgery. The onset time of the sensory- and motor block, recovery time until discharge and complications will be studied.

Detailed description

The ideal spinal anesthesia in day-case surgery is characterized by a short onset of sensory and motor blockade, and a rapid recovery after the operation. Short-acting local-anesthetics are used frequently in this setting. Lidocaine is one of the agents that is used most frequently. It has been associated with an increased incidence of Transient Neurological Symptoms (TNS). Articaine is another agent that is being used more often and is said to act faster and shorter than lidocaine. We will compare spinal anesthesia with lidocaine and articaine in a randomized double-blind clinical trial. Endpoint are: * onset of sensory and motor block * recovery from sensory and motor block * time to micturition * patient satisfaction * complications

Interventions

DRUGspinal administration of lidocaine

Sponsors

St. Antonius Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age \> 18 years * ASA I-III * Patients planned for a short surgical procedure on lower extremities or lower abdomen. * Procedure in day-case setting * Procedure under spinal anesthesia * Informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* Contra-indications spinal anesthesia * History of allergic reactions on amide-type local anesthetics * Pregnancy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Onset time (sec) of sensory and motor blockade (after administration of drug)
Recovery time (min) from sensory and motor blockade
Spread of sensory blockade (30 min after administration of drug, dermatomal level)

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Hemodynamic stability (lowest systolic blood pressure, vasopressor therapy)
Complications
Patient satisfaction

Countries

Netherlands

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026