Skip to content

Randomized Study of Not Giving Diphteria-tetanus-pertussis Vaccination With or After Measles Vaccination

Diphteria-tetanus-pertussis (DTP) Vaccination and Child Survival: Randomized Study of Not Providing DTP Vaccination Together With or After Measles Vaccination

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00244673
Enrollment
6534
Registered
2005-10-27
Start date
2005-10-31
Completion date
2011-12-31
Last updated
2012-02-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Adverse Events, Hospitalization, Mortality

Keywords

Vaccination, DTP, Child mortality, Sex, Non-specific effects

Brief summary

In non-randomized studies, routine childhood vaccinations have been observed to have non-targeted effects. Difteria-tetanus-pertussis (DTP) vaccine provided with or after measles vaccine (MV) is associated with increased mortality in areas with herd immunity to pertussis. We will examine in a randomised study of 6000 children the effect of not administering DTP simultaneously with or after MV on overall child mortality, hospitalization rates, and the immunological responses after vaccination. We will also examine potential sex-differential effects in the outcomes and interactions with other vaccines, other health interventions and season.

Detailed description

Background: Infectious diseases are the main cause of high child mortality in Africa. In several non-randomised studies, routine childhood vaccinations have been observed to have non-targeted effects. Live vaccines like measles vaccine (MV) seem to protect against overall mortality, whereas killed vaccines, like DTP, may have no beneficial effects, especially for girls. DTP provided with or after MV may be associated with increased mortality. The mechanisms behind these effects are unknown. Hypothesis: Not providing DTP together with or after MV is associated with a 35 % reduction in overall mortality and 23% reduction in hospitalizations. Objectives: To examine in a randomised study of 6000 children the effect of not administering DTP simultaneously with or after MV on 1. Overall child mortality 2. Hospitalization rates and major causes of hospitalization 3. The immunological profile after vaccination 4. Sex-differences in the above mentioned outcomes Methods: Surveillance system: BHP's demographic surveillance system in Bissau covers 6 districts with a population of 90,000; 3,500 children are born each year. Hospitalizations: There is only one pediatric ward in Bissau and all hospitalizations are identified in the BHP register. Vaccinations: Vaccinations are provided and registered at the 3 health centres in the study area. Intervention: In this study 6000 children are randomised as they come to receive DTP3 or DTP booster with or after measles vaccination (MV) at the local health centres. Children will be randomised to DTP3+OPV3 and MV versus OPV3 and MV or DTP4+OPV4 versus OPV4 (booster doses). Follow-up: The children will be followed until 4 years of age or end of study. 1. Adverse effects: In the first month after vaccination, 1000 children will be visited daily for three days and then weekly to register morbidity and consultations. 2. Hospitalizations: The children will be followed at the pediatric ward. 3. Mortality: Children will be followed by the routine surveillance system. Furthermore, all children will be visited yearly and finally when they reach four years of age. When a death is detected, a physician will conduct a verbal autopsy. Sample size: With a total of 7500 person-years of follow-up, we will be able to document a 35% reduction in mortality and a 23% reduction in hospitalizations. A subgroup of children will be examined for possible differences in immunological profile after vaccination. Ethical considerations: Herd immunity to pertussis should not be affected as, due to the intervention, more children is vaccinated.

Interventions

BIOLOGICALDTP3/4+OPV+MV versus OPV+MV or DTP4+OPV4 versus OPV4

Trial of not providing 3. and/or 4. DTP together with or after MV at 9 to 18 month of age.

Sponsors

Aarhus University Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Rigshospitalet, Denmark
CollaboratorOTHER
Bandim Health Project
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
9 Months to 4 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. The child should be missing DTP3 or DTP4 2. The child should have received DTP2 3. The child should have received MV already or receive MV on the day of enrolment

Exclusion criteria

Normally applied contraindications for receiving vaccinations, including high fever

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Adverse events 1 month after interventionDecember 2008
Mortality till 4 years of ageJune 2011
Hospitalisations till 4 years of ageJune 2011

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Immunological responsesJuly 2008
MorbidityJune 2011

Countries

Guinea-Bissau

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026