Skip to content

A Randomized Trial of Vaccine Adherence in Young Injection Drug Users

A Randomized Trial of Vaccine Adherence in Young IDU

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00244374
Acronym
UFO VAX
Enrollment
546
Registered
2005-10-26
Start date
2004-08-31
Completion date
2008-06-30
Last updated
2013-09-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Medication Adherence, Substance Abuse, Intravenous, Risk Behavior, Hepatitis A, Hepatitis B, Hepatitis C

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the effects of (a) immunization setting and (b) outreach worker support on young injection drug users' (IDU) adherence to a multiple dose immunization schedule with a combined hepatitis A virus (HAV) inactivated and hepatitis B virus (HBV) recombinant vaccine.

Detailed description

This is a research trial consisting of a cross-sectional screening study and a prospective cohort study (randomized, 2x2 factorial design). The primary aim of the study is to evaluate the effects of immunization setting and outreach worker support on young IDU's adherence to a multiple dose immunization schedule with a combined HAV and HBV vaccine. Secondarily, the study will 1) explore the feasibility of a remote immunization network and web-based vaccine registry to improve immunization coverage of transient young IDU, 2) examine the effect of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in vaccine effectiveness, and 3) assess behavior change and vaccine attitudes in young IDU participating in a preventive vaccine trial. Subjects in the screening study complete an interview, receive counseling and testing for HIV, HAV, HBV and HCV, and return in one week for test results and risk reduction counseling. Subjects eligible for the cohort study receive their first immunizations at enrollment and then are randomized to receive subsequent vaccines at either a set of syringe exchange programs (SEP) or at a public health adult immunization clinic (AIC). Subjects also are randomized to receive vaccine reminders from an outreach worker or no outreach worker support. Each subject receives a total of 4 immunizations over 6 months. Follow up visits include interviews, counseling, and viral testing. Study participation is for 12 months.

Interventions

BIOLOGICALHepatitis A & B vaccine

Each subject will receive a total of 4 immunizations over 6 months on a 0-1-2-6 month schedule. At the initial visit, subjects\>18 years of age will receive the Twinrix vaccine and subjects\<18 years of age will receive the Engerix-B vaccine. Cohort subjects\>18 years found to have HAV antibody at screening will receive Engerix-B for their remaining 3 immunizations. All subjects will receive: an immunization record with the first vaccine dose entered and the dates the next doses are due; helpful hints for remembering vaccine appointments; and written instructions on where and how to get immunized outside of SF.

BEHAVIORALOutreach

Outreach worker vaccine adherence support: Half of cohort subjects will be assigned to outreach worker vaccine adherence support and will meet with their outreach workers from Haight Ashbury Youth Outreach Team (HAYOT) and Glide Health Services on the day of vaccine cohort study enrollment. Intensive vaccination tracking and in-person outreach support will begin one week before the second and third vaccine doses are due, and again two weeks before the fourth dose is due.

BEHAVIORALAIC

The Adult Immunization Clinic (AIC) is a public low-cost vaccine clinic located centrally at 101 Grove Street in the lobby of the San Francisco Department of Public Health (SFDPH). The clinic is open from Monday-Friday 9 a.m. to 4 p.m. Nurses at the AIC will be available 40 hours/week to administer free immunizations to study subjects.

BEHAVIORALSEP

Subjects randomized to a set of syringe exchange programs for administration of viral hepatitis immunizations at Month 1, 2, 6. Research nurses will provide 16 hours/week of vaccine administration services at SEPs well attended by young IDU. The San Francisco Needle Exchange (SFNE) serves primarily youth and young adults on Mondays, Wednesdays, and Fridays from 5-7 p.m. in an indoor location in the Haight-Ashbury district. A study nurse will be at SFNE for a total of 6 hours per week. HIV Prevention Project (HPP) sites also operate for 2 hrs each (Tues, Thu, Fri, Sat). Medical services are provided either in a clinic setting at indoor sites (6th Street) or at outdoor sites (Hemlock Alley, Duboce). A study nurse will attend each of these 5 weekly sites for a total of 10 hours/week.

Sponsors

National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)
CollaboratorNIH
University of California, San Francisco
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
FACTORIAL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
14 Years to 29 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

(screening study): * age 14-29 at screening * injected drugs in the prior 30 days

Exclusion criteria

(screening study): * Prior positive HIV antibody test * Prior HBV immunization Inclusion Criteria (vaccine cohort): * participated in the screening study * tested negative for HIV-1 antibody and HBV markers in the screening study * returned for screening test results within 30 days of testing

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Vaccine Series Completion12 monthsThe primary outcome was the completion of the four-dose vaccine series in a 12 month period.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
HIV Vaccine Trial WillingnessBaselineWe assessed knowledge about vaccine trials and willingness to participate in preventive HIV vaccine trials by asking the question: How willing would you be to join a study of a vaccine to prevent HIV infection, if the study were to start tomorrow?. Willingness was measured on a 4-point response scale, ranging from 1 (Definitely not willing) to 4 (Definitely willing).
HIV Vaccine Trial KnowledgeBaselineParticipants were asked if they agreed or disagreed with or were unsure of each of eight statements about HIV vaccine trial concepts from the HIV Network for Prevention Trials (HIVNET). 1. Preventive HIV vaccine studies enroll people who are HIV-positive and HIV-negative. 2. Some participants in HIV vaccine studies will get a real vaccine, and some will get a placebo (an inactive substance). 3. Only vaccines known to be at least 50% effective at preventing HIV are tested in HIV vaccine studies. 4. Once a large scale HIV vaccine study begins, we can be sure the vaccine is completely safe. 5. Participants are told whether they got the HIV vaccine or the placebo at the end of HIV vaccine studies. 6. HIV vaccines will never affect a person's HIV test results. 7. An HIV vaccine can infect a person with HIV disease. 8. People in vaccine studies know whether or not they got the placebo because only the vaccines cause side effects.
Hepatitis B Surface Antibody Seroconversion After 3 Vaccine Doses12 monthsTo examine the effect of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection on vaccine effectiveness, we compared anti-HBs (antibody to the hepatitis B surface antigen) seroconversion after three vaccine doses between anti-HCV (antibody to the hepatitis C virus) positive and anti-HCV negative participants.
Viral Transmission Risk Behavior Association With TravelBaselineIn a cross-sectional analysis of 355 subjects enrolled between 2004 and 2006, we estimate the associations between travel in the 3 months prior to baseline and behaviors occurring in the 30 days prior to baseline, such as drug and alcohol and sexual behaviors, that may facilitate the spread of viral infections.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Between 08/31/2004 and 11/30/2007, street-based outreach workers distributed study invitation cards to potential subjects in neighborhoods of San Francisco where young injection drug users (IDU) are known to congregate. Initial Contact form included self-reported age, IDU in last 30 days, hepatitis B immunization and HIV-positive status.

Pre-assignment details

1304 persons completed initial contact form; 645 were eligible and 546 opted to participate in the cross-sectional study. The vaccine adherence cohort (n=167) included participants enrolled prior to 3/31/2007 who met additional eligibility criteria.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
All Participants
Participants in pre-randomization cross-sectional study
546
Total546

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003FG004
Evaluation for Vaccine Adherence CohortDeclined to participate in cohort120000
Evaluation for Vaccine Adherence CohortDid not return for screening test result340000
Evaluation for Vaccine Adherence CohortEvidence of hepatitis B immunization1720000
Evaluation for Vaccine Adherence CohortReturned for results after enroll window40000
Evaluation for Vaccine Adherence CohortUnable/unwilling to complete enrollment510000
Pre-Randomization Cross-sectional StudyDid not complete baseline procedures1050000
Pre-Randomization Cross-sectional StudyDid not respond to willingness questions140000
Pre-Randomization Cross-sectional StudyInterviewer lack confidence in responses10000
Pre-Randomization Cross-sectional StudyTechnical difficulty loss of data170000

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicAll Participants
Age, Customized
Age 0 - 14 years
0 Participants
Age, Customized
Age 15 - 29 years
546 Participants
Age, Customized
Age >= 30 years
0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
52 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
460 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
34 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
10 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
7 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
11 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
63 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
61 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
392 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
546 participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Female
149 Participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Male
395 Participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Unknown/Other/Not Reported
2 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 470 / 430 / 360 / 41
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 470 / 430 / 360 / 41

Outcome results

Primary

Vaccine Series Completion

The primary outcome was the completion of the four-dose vaccine series in a 12 month period.

Time frame: 12 months

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
AIC OnlyVaccine Series CompletionCompleted <4 vaccine doses31 participants
AIC OnlyVaccine Series CompletionCompleted 4 vaccine doses16 participants
AIC + OutreachVaccine Series CompletionCompleted 4 vaccine doses20 participants
AIC + OutreachVaccine Series CompletionCompleted <4 vaccine doses23 participants
SEP OnlyVaccine Series CompletionCompleted 4 vaccine doses8 participants
SEP OnlyVaccine Series CompletionCompleted <4 vaccine doses28 participants
SEP + OutreachVaccine Series CompletionCompleted <4 vaccine doses31 participants
SEP + OutreachVaccine Series CompletionCompleted 4 vaccine doses10 participants
Secondary

Hepatitis B Surface Antibody Seroconversion After 3 Vaccine Doses

To examine the effect of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection on vaccine effectiveness, we compared anti-HBs (antibody to the hepatitis B surface antigen) seroconversion after three vaccine doses between anti-HCV (antibody to the hepatitis C virus) positive and anti-HCV negative participants.

Time frame: 12 months

Population: 139 participants who completed 3 vaccine doses were included in the analysis. Enrollment for this aim continued after enrollment into the 12-month vaccine adherence trial closed; an additional 51 persons were found eligible and enrolled.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
AIC OnlyHepatitis B Surface Antibody Seroconversion After 3 Vaccine Dosesanti-HBs positive20 Participants
AIC OnlyHepatitis B Surface Antibody Seroconversion After 3 Vaccine Dosesanti-HBs negative11 Participants
AIC + OutreachHepatitis B Surface Antibody Seroconversion After 3 Vaccine Dosesanti-HBs positive90 Participants
AIC + OutreachHepatitis B Surface Antibody Seroconversion After 3 Vaccine Dosesanti-HBs negative18 Participants
Secondary

HIV Vaccine Trial Knowledge

Participants were asked if they agreed or disagreed with or were unsure of each of eight statements about HIV vaccine trial concepts from the HIV Network for Prevention Trials (HIVNET). 1. Preventive HIV vaccine studies enroll people who are HIV-positive and HIV-negative. 2. Some participants in HIV vaccine studies will get a real vaccine, and some will get a placebo (an inactive substance). 3. Only vaccines known to be at least 50% effective at preventing HIV are tested in HIV vaccine studies. 4. Once a large scale HIV vaccine study begins, we can be sure the vaccine is completely safe. 5. Participants are told whether they got the HIV vaccine or the placebo at the end of HIV vaccine studies. 6. HIV vaccines will never affect a person's HIV test results. 7. An HIV vaccine can infect a person with HIV disease. 8. People in vaccine studies know whether or not they got the placebo because only the vaccines cause side effects.

Time frame: Baseline

Population: Per the Participant Flow, 409 participants in the cross-sectional study had complete and valid baseline data

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
AIC OnlyHIV Vaccine Trial Knowledge5-8 Correct answers94 Participants
AIC OnlyHIV Vaccine Trial Knowledge0-4 Correct answers315 Participants
Secondary

HIV Vaccine Trial Willingness

We assessed knowledge about vaccine trials and willingness to participate in preventive HIV vaccine trials by asking the question: How willing would you be to join a study of a vaccine to prevent HIV infection, if the study were to start tomorrow?. Willingness was measured on a 4-point response scale, ranging from 1 (Definitely not willing) to 4 (Definitely willing).

Time frame: Baseline

Population: Per the Participant Flow, 409 participants in the cross-sectional study had complete and valid baseline data

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
AIC OnlyHIV Vaccine Trial Willingness1=Definitely not willing24 Participants
AIC OnlyHIV Vaccine Trial Willingness2=Probably not willing68 Participants
AIC OnlyHIV Vaccine Trial Willingness3=Probably willing170 Participants
AIC OnlyHIV Vaccine Trial Willingness4=Definitely willing147 Participants
Secondary

Viral Transmission Risk Behavior Association With Travel

In a cross-sectional analysis of 355 subjects enrolled between 2004 and 2006, we estimate the associations between travel in the 3 months prior to baseline and behaviors occurring in the 30 days prior to baseline, such as drug and alcohol and sexual behaviors, that may facilitate the spread of viral infections.

Time frame: Baseline

Population: Cross-sectional analysis of 355 subjects enrolled between 2004 and 2006

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
AIC OnlyViral Transmission Risk Behavior Association With TravelUsed (injected/snorted/smoked) heroin83.7 percentage of participants
AIC OnlyViral Transmission Risk Behavior Association With TravelUsed (injected/snorted/smoked) powder cocaine55.7 percentage of participants
AIC OnlyViral Transmission Risk Behavior Association With TravelUsed (injected/snorted/smoked) crack cocaine56.5 percentage of participants
AIC OnlyViral Transmission Risk Behavior Association With TravelUsed (injected/snorted/smoked) methamphetamine67.4 percentage of participants
AIC OnlyViral Transmission Risk Behavior Association With TravelMore than one of the above (poly-substance use)87.2 percentage of participants
AIC OnlyViral Transmission Risk Behavior Association With TravelHeavy drinking (>14, >21 per week; women, men)52.3 percentage of participants
AIC OnlyViral Transmission Risk Behavior Association With TravelDrank until blacked out36.8 percentage of participants
AIC OnlyViral Transmission Risk Behavior Association With TravelInjected daily, past 30 days23.5 percentage of participants
AIC OnlyViral Transmission Risk Behavior Association With TravelNumber of injecting partners >=559.7 percentage of participants
AIC OnlyViral Transmission Risk Behavior Association With TravelLent a needle/syringe53.3 percentage of participants
AIC OnlyViral Transmission Risk Behavior Association With TravelInjected with someone else's used needle/syringe52.3 percentage of participants
AIC OnlyViral Transmission Risk Behavior Association With TravelPooled money to buy drugs86.4 percentage of participants
AIC OnlyViral Transmission Risk Behavior Association With TravelShared cooker/spoon to prepare drugs67.0 percentage of participants
AIC OnlyViral Transmission Risk Behavior Association With TravelSyringe was backloaded62.7 percentage of participants
AIC OnlyViral Transmission Risk Behavior Association With TravelDid someone's rinse42.5 percentage of participants
AIC OnlyViral Transmission Risk Behavior Association With TravelMedian number of sexual partners >=258.4 percentage of participants
AIC OnlyViral Transmission Risk Behavior Association With TravelTraded sex for money or drugs11.3 percentage of participants
AIC OnlyViral Transmission Risk Behavior Association With Travel>90% condom use if sexually active24.3 percentage of participants
AIC + OutreachViral Transmission Risk Behavior Association With TravelSyringe was backloaded47.4 percentage of participants
AIC + OutreachViral Transmission Risk Behavior Association With TravelUsed (injected/snorted/smoked) heroin76.1 percentage of participants
AIC + OutreachViral Transmission Risk Behavior Association With TravelLent a needle/syringe46.3 percentage of participants
AIC + OutreachViral Transmission Risk Behavior Association With TravelUsed (injected/snorted/smoked) powder cocaine41.0 percentage of participants
AIC + OutreachViral Transmission Risk Behavior Association With Travel>90% condom use if sexually active22.5 percentage of participants
AIC + OutreachViral Transmission Risk Behavior Association With TravelUsed (injected/snorted/smoked) crack cocaine45.5 percentage of participants
AIC + OutreachViral Transmission Risk Behavior Association With TravelInjected with someone else's used needle/syringe37.8 percentage of participants
AIC + OutreachViral Transmission Risk Behavior Association With TravelUsed (injected/snorted/smoked) methamphetamine78.4 percentage of participants
AIC + OutreachViral Transmission Risk Behavior Association With TravelDid someone's rinse34.3 percentage of participants
AIC + OutreachViral Transmission Risk Behavior Association With TravelMore than one of the above (poly-substance use)76.3 percentage of participants
AIC + OutreachViral Transmission Risk Behavior Association With TravelPooled money to buy drugs66.2 percentage of participants
AIC + OutreachViral Transmission Risk Behavior Association With TravelHeavy drinking (>14, >21 per week; women, men)13.7 percentage of participants
AIC + OutreachViral Transmission Risk Behavior Association With TravelTraded sex for money or drugs11.9 percentage of participants
AIC + OutreachViral Transmission Risk Behavior Association With TravelDrank until blacked out13.7 percentage of participants
AIC + OutreachViral Transmission Risk Behavior Association With TravelShared cooker/spoon to prepare drugs48.1 percentage of participants
AIC + OutreachViral Transmission Risk Behavior Association With TravelInjected daily, past 30 days33.6 percentage of participants
AIC + OutreachViral Transmission Risk Behavior Association With TravelMedian number of sexual partners >=238.1 percentage of participants
AIC + OutreachViral Transmission Risk Behavior Association With TravelNumber of injecting partners >=541.1 percentage of participants
Comparison: Adjusted odds with 95% confidence intervals for travel as a risk factor for each behavior.p-value: 0.0595% CI: [0.8, 2.44]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Adjusted odds with 95% confidence intervals for travel as a risk factor for each behavior.p-value: 0.0195% CI: [1.12, 2.76]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Adjusted odds with 95% confidence intervals for travel as a risk factor for each behavior.p-value: 0.0395% CI: [0.35, 0.98]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Adjusted odds with 95% confidence intervals for travel as a risk factor for each behavior.p-value: <0.0195% CI: [1.11, 3.59]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Adjusted odds with 95% confidence intervals for travel as a risk factor for each behavior.p-value: 0.0595% CI: [1, 2.44]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Adjusted odds with 95% confidence intervals for travel as a risk factor for each behavior.p-value: <0.0195% CI: [3.84, 12.28]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Adjusted odds with 95% confidence intervals for travel as a risk factor for each behavior.p-value: <0.0195% CI: [2.02, 6.5]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Adjusted odds with 95% confidence intervals for travel as a risk factor for each behavior.p-value: 0.0495% CI: [0.33, 0.93]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Adjusted odds with 95% confidence intervals for travel as a risk factor for each behavior.p-value: <0.0195% CI: [1.37, 3.4]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Adjusted odds with 95% confidence interval for travel in the prior 3 months as a risk factor for having Lent a needle/syringe in the past 30 daysp-value: 0.1995% CI: [0.81, 1.97]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Adjusted odds ratio with 95 % confidence interval for travel in prior 3 months as a risk factor for having injected with someone else's used needle/syringe in the past 30 daysp-value: <0.0195% CI: [1.01, 2.55]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Adjusted odds with 95% confidence interval for travel in the prior 3 months as a risk factor for having Pooled money to buy drugs in the past 30 daysp-value: <0.0195% CI: [1.79, 5.27]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Adjusted odds ratios with 95% confidence interval for travel in prior 3 months as risk factor for risk behaviorsp-value: <0.0195% CI: [1.34, 3.32]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Adjusted odds with 95 % confidence interval for travel as a risk factor for risk behaviorsp-value: <0.0195% CI: [1.19, 2.95]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Adjusted odds with 95% confidence interval for travel in prior 3 months as a risk factor for risk behavior in past 30 daysp-value: 0.1395% CI: [0.83, 2.1]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Adjusted odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals for travel in prior 3 months as a risk factor for risk behaviors in past 30 daysp-value: <0.0195% CI: [1.4, 3.49]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Adjusted odds and 95% confidence interval for travel in prior 3 months as a risk factor for risk behaviors in past 30 daysp-value: 0.8695% CI: [0.45, 1.85]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Adjusted odds and 95% confidence interval for travel in prior 3 months as a risk factor for engaging in risk behavior during the past 30 daysp-value: 0.7395% CI: [0.59, 2.02]Regression, Logistic

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026