Skip to content

Efficacy of Cyclophosphamide Versus Methylprednisolone in Patients With Secondary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis

A Double-blind, Two-arm, Multicenter, Randomized Trial to Evaluate Efficacy of Cyclophosphamide Versus Methylprednisolone in Patients With Recent Secondary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis: P.R.OM.E.S.S Study

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00241254
Acronym
PROMESS
Enrollment
138
Registered
2005-10-18
Start date
2005-12-31
Completion date
2012-03-31
Last updated
2012-03-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Multiple Sclerosis, Chronic Progressive

Keywords

Multiple Sclerosis, Chronic Progressive, Cyclophosphamide, Methylprednisolone, Randomized Controlled Trials, Double-Blind Study

Brief summary

Preliminary not-controlled clinical studies of the efficacy of monthly intravenous cyclophosphamide administration in secondary progressive multiple sclerosis reported encouraging results, but no randomized controlled trial has been conducted so far. The primary objective of this trial is to evaluate the efficacy of IV cyclophosphamide as compared to IV methylprednisolone administered every 4 weeks during 1 year and every 8 weeks during 1 year, on the delay to confirmed disability deterioration as assessed by the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) in patients with secondary progressive multiple sclerosis. The secondary objectives are to evaluate safety, tolerability and efficacy at 2 years on the Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite (MSFC), the percentage of patients with disability deterioration (EDSS) and the number of relapses. An intention-to-treat statistical analysis will be carried out.

Detailed description

Background Preliminary not-controlled clinical studies of the efficacy of monthly intravenous cyclophosphamide administration in secondary progressive multiple sclerosis reported encouraging results, but no randomized controlled trial has been conducted so far. A slight efficacy of Methylprednisolone has been reported in this indication. Objectives The primary objective is to evaluate the efficacy of IV cyclophosphamide on the prevention of disability deterioration in patients with secondary progressive multiple sclerosis. The secondary objectives are to evaluate safety, tolerability and efficacy of IV cyclophosphamide on the Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite (MSFC) and the number of relapses. Study design Randomized double-blind two-arm controlled trial. Intervention Experimental group : IV cyclophosphamide infusion administered every 4 weeks during 1 year and every 8 weeks during 1 year. Control group : IV methylprednisolone infusion administered every 4 weeks during 1 year and every 8 weeks during 1 year. Outcomes Primary outcome : delay to disability deterioration as assessed by the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS: 0.5 or 1 point increase, depending on baseline score) evaluated every 4 weeks for one year, then every 8 weeks for one year. Secondary outcomes : proportion of patients with disability deterioration (EDSS: 0.5 or 1 point increase, depending on baseline score), Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite (MSFC) and the Z scores of MSFC three components, number of MS relapses, proportion of patients with adverse events and delay of occurrence of adverse events, quality of life questionnaires. * Quality of life questionnaires * Disability self-assessment questionnaires Main time of assessment : 2 years. Sample size 360 patients Statistical analysis Intention-to-treat analysis.

Interventions

DRUGCyclophosphamide (drug)

IV cyclophosphamide infusion administered every 4 weeks during 1 year and every 8 weeks during 1 year.

Control group : IV methylprednisolone infusion administered every 4 weeks during 1 year and every 8 weeks during 1 year.

Sponsors

Ministry of Health, France
CollaboratorOTHER_GOV
University Hospital, Bordeaux
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Multiple sclerosis (MS) subjects (Mc Donald et al criteria), * Aged 18 to 65 * Diagnosis of secondary progressive MS ( Lublin and Reingold criteria) * Progressive deterioration phase of at least 6 months and less than 4 years. * Reduction of walking capacity and increase EDSS not ascribed to consequence of relapses (at least 0.5 point) in the last 12 months * EDSS between 4.0 and 6.5 included * Female participating must use contraceptives while on study drug * Written informed consent * Patient protected by French social security system

Exclusion criteria

* Others diseases interfering with MS or treatment * Recent history (within the previous 2 years) of drug or alcohol abuse. * Patients with psychiatric illnesses who are unable to provide written, informed consent prior to any testing under this protocol * Hemorrhagic cystitis * Pregnant or lactating women * Known allergy at cyclophosphamide, corticoids and in particular methylprednisolone * Persistent infectious diseases * Patients with bladder permanent catheterization * Known history of cardiac arrhythmia after methylprednisolone intravenous treatment * Abnormal screening/baseline blood tests exceeding any of the limits defined below : Hb \< 9g/dl or Total white blood cell count less than 3 000/mm3 or lymphocytes count less than 900/ mm3 or Platelet count less than 125 000/mm3 * Gastric or duodenal ulcer in evolution * Gut diverticulosis * Diabetes mellitus * Known history of active hepatitis (ASAT \>3 X ULN) * Known history of renal failure (creatinine level \> 180 µmol/L) * Psychosis * Current or past (\< 3 months) participation in another drug trial * Prior use of cyclophosphamide, lymphoid irradiation, monoclonal antibodies anti CD4 or anti CD52 or anti-VLA-4 therapies, cladribine ou cyclosporine A * Other clinical types of MS : Secondary progressive phase evolving for more than 4 years ; Remittent type of MS without progression between relapses ; Primary progressive type of MS * Use of interferon beta, methotrexate or imurel in the month prior to study. * Treatment with intravenous monthly corticoids in the year prior to study. * Treatment with corticoids (3 to 5 days) in the 2 month prior to study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Delay to disability deterioration as assessed by the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS: 0.5 or 1 point increase, depending on baseline score)every 4 weeks for one year, then every 8 weeks for one year

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite (MSFC) and the Z scores of MSFC three componentsVisit number 1, 2, 13(at one year),19 (at two years) and 20 (last visit)
Number of MS relapsesall along the follow up period
Proportion of patients with disability deterioration (EDSS: 0.5 or 1 point increase, depending on baseline score)every month during one year then every two months during the 2nd year
Quality of life questionnairesvisit 2, 13(at one year) and 19 (at two years)
Disability self-assessment questionnairesvisite 2, 13 et 19
Proportion of patients with adverse events and delay of occurrence of adverse eventsall along the follow up period

Countries

France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 27, 2026